Both the Buzzard and the Goshawk nested mainly in pines. The mean clutch size in the former was 2.8, in the latter 3.6 eggs per breeding pair. There were statistically significant differences in clutch sizes in the Buzzard in particular breeding seasons. The mean number of hatchlings was 2.3 in the Buzzard and 2.6 in the Goshawk. Brood losses were similar in both raptors — 19% in the Goshawk and 24% in the Buzzard. The breeding success (the ratio of the number of fledglings to the clutch size) in the Buzzard was highest in clutches of 3 and 4 eggs, whereas in the Goshawk a similar level of success was achieved with smaller clutches (2 or 3 eggs). Only in the case of the Buzzard there were significant differences in clutch sizes and numbers of fledglings in the various years. In this species the mean number of fledglings was positively correlated with the rodent availability index in a given year. There was no such relationship between the abundance of prey items found in Goshawk nests and the number of fledglings. The correlation between the number of newly-fledged Buzzards and Goshawks in a given year could have been due to diet overlap between the two species.
G. E. Austin
,
D. C. Houston
1997. The breeding performance of the buzzard Buteo buteo in Argyll, Scotland and a comparison with other areas in Britain. Bird Study 44: 146–154. Google Scholar
N. T. J. Bailey
1950. Statistical methods in biology. English Universities Press. London. Google Scholar
S. Cramp
(ed.). 1982. Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. The birds of Western Palearctic. Vol., II. Oxford University Press. Oxford. Google Scholar
T. Drazny
,
A. Adamski
1996. The number, reproduction and food of Goshawks Accipiter gentilis in Central Silesia (SW Poland). Populationsökologie von Greifvögel- und Eulen 3: 207–219. Google Scholar
W. Dudziński
1988. Wintering ground of the partridge. In: Common Partridge Inter. Symp. Polish Hunting Association. Warsaw, pp.165–183. Google Scholar
W. Fisher
1980. Die Habichte. Neue Brehm-Bücherei. A. Ziemsen Verlag. Wittenberg Lutherstadt. Google Scholar
J. Goszczyński
1985. [The effect of structural differentiation of ecological landscape on the predator-prey interaction]. Wyd. SGGW-AR. Warszawa. Google Scholar
J. Goszczyński
1991. The food habits of buzzards and goshawks during the nesting periods. In:
S. Csányi,
J. Ernhaft
(eds). Trans, of 20th Congr. of the Int. Union of Game Biologist. Part 1. University of Agricultural Sciences. Gödölö, pp. 387–390. Google Scholar
J. Goszczyński
1997. Density and productivity of common buzzard Buteo buteo and goshawks Accipiter gentilis populations in Rogów, Central Poland. Acta Ornithol. 32:149–155. Google Scholar
J. Goszczyński
,
T. Piłatowski
1986. Diet of the common buzzards (Buteo buteo) and goshawks (Accipiter gentilis) in the nesting period. Ekol. Pol. 34: 655–667. Google Scholar
A. Kostrzewa
1991. Interspecific interference competition in three European raptor species. Ethology, Ecology & Evolution 3: 127–143. Google Scholar
A. Kostrzewa
,
R. Kostrzewa
1990. The relationship of spring and summer weather with density and breeding performance of the Buzzard Buteo buteo, Goshawk Accipiter gentilis and Kestrel Falco tinnunculus.
Ibis 132: 550–559. Google Scholar
A. Kostrzewa
,
G. Speer
,
Dewitz W. von
,
H. Weiser
2000. Zur Populationsökologie des Habichts (Accipiter gentilis) in der Niederrheinischen Bucht (1981–1998). Charadrius 36: 80–93. Google Scholar
T. Mebs
1964. Zur Biologie und Populationsdynamik des Mausebussards (Buteo buteo). J. Ornithol. 105: 247–306. Google Scholar
R. Möeckel,
G. Dietmar
1987. Die Reproductionsrate des Habichts Accipiter gentilis (L.) im Westerzgebirgein den Jahren 1974–83. In:
M. Stubbe
(ed.). Populationsökologie von Greifvögel- und Eulenarten. Halle (Saale), pp. 217–232. Google Scholar
B. Olech
1991. [Protection of birds of prey in Kampinoski National Park. Status and recommendations]. Ochrona Przyr. 49: 65–79. Google Scholar
B. Olech
1997. Diet of the Goshawk Accipiter gentilis in Kampinoski National Park (Central Poland). Acta Ornithol. 32:191–200. Google Scholar
B. Olech
1998. Population dynamics and breeding performance of the Goshawk Accipiter gentilis in Central Poland in 1982–1994. In:
R. D. Chancelor,
B. -U. Meyburg,
J. J. Ferrero
(eds). Holarctic Birds of Prey, pp. 101–109. Google Scholar
V. Selås
1997. Influence of prey availability on re-establishment of Goshawk Accipiter gentilis nesting territories. Ornis Fenn. 74: 113–120. Google Scholar
S. Sulkava,
K. Huhtala,
R. Tornberg
1994. Regulation of Goshawk Accipiter gentilis breeding in Western Finland over the last 30 years. In:
B. -U. Meyburg,
R. D. Chancellor
(eds). Raptor Conservation Today. WWGBP/The Pica Press. Berlin, pp. 67–76. Google Scholar
R. Tornberg
1997. Prey selection of the Goshawks Accipiter gentilis during the breeding seasons: The role of prey profitability and vulnerability. Ornis Fenn. 74:15–28. Google Scholar
R. Tornberg
,
S. Sulkava
1991.The effect of changing tetraonid population on the nutrition and breeding success of the Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis L.) in northern Finland. Aquilo Ser. Zool. 28: 23–33. Google Scholar
L. Tomiałojć
1990. [Birds of Poland — their distribution and abundance]. PWN, Warszawa. Google Scholar
M. Wasilewski
1990. Population dynamics of pheasants near Rogów, Central Poland. Ekol. Pol. 34: 669–680. Google Scholar
Acta Ornithologica
Vol. 36 • No. 2
December 2001
Vol. 36 • No. 2
December 2001
Accipiter gentilis
brood size
Buteo buteo
clutch size
Common Buzzard
goshawk
variability of breeding
