Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2003 Repeatability of Egg Dimensions within the Clutches of Bearded Tit Panurus biarmicus
Adrian Surmacki, Janusz Stępniewski, Piotr Zduniak
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The variation in size and shape of Bearded Tit eggs was investigated in the Wielkopolska Region of western Poland in 1988–1992 and 1997–2000. The mean clutch size was 5.47 (95% CL: 5.25–5.70, n = 99), and differed markedly from year to year. Coefficients of variations for the mean egg characteristics in a clutch ranged from 1.91 (breadth) to 4.90 (volume). No significant correlation between egg length and breadth was found. Repeatability estimates were 0.50, 0.48, 0.50, 0.47 for length, breadth, volume and elongation index, respectively. The results suggest a relatively low heritability of egg dimensions in the population studied.

REFERENCES

1.

J. Bańbura 1996. [Intrapopulation variability of egg measurements in the Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica]. Wyd. UŁ., Łódź. Google Scholar

2.

J. Bańbura , P. Zieliński 1990. Within-clutch repeatability of egg dimensions in the Black-headed Gull Larus ridibundus. J. Ornithol. 131: 305–310. Google Scholar

3.

J. Bańbura , P. Zieliński 1998. An analysis of egg-size repeatability in Barn Swallows Hirundo rustica. Ardeola 45: 183–192. Google Scholar

4.

Z. Barta , T. Szekely 1997. The optimal shape of avian eggs. Funct. Ecol. 11: 656–662. Google Scholar

5.

W. A. Becker 1992. Manual of Quantitative Genetics. Academic Enterprises, Pullman, Washington. Google Scholar

6.

P. T. Boag, A. J. van Noordwijk 1987. Quantitative genetics. In: P. A. Buckley , F. Cooke (eds). Avian genetics. Academic Press, London, pp. 45–78. Google Scholar

7.

P. Chylarecki 1993. Decomposing selection on avian egg size. Proc. IVth Congr. Europ. Soc. Evol. Biol., Montpellier, p. 82. Google Scholar

8.

P. Chylarecki , L. Kuczyński , M. Vorgin , P. Tryjanowski 1997. Geographical variation in egg measurements of the Lapwing Vanellus vanellus. Acta Ornithol. 32: 137–148. Google Scholar

9.

S. Cramp 1998. The complete Birds of Western Palearctic on CD-ROM. Oxford Univ. Press. Google Scholar

10.

A. Dyrcz , W. Zdunek 1996. [Potential food resources and nestling food in the Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus and Reed Warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus at Milicz fish-ponds]. Ptaki Śląska 11: 123–132. Google Scholar

11.

D. S. Falconer, T. C. F. Mackay 1995. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longmann, Harlow. Google Scholar

12.

P. Hendricks 1991. Repeatability of size and shape of American Pipit eggs. Can. J. Zool. 69: 2624–2628. Google Scholar

13.

D. F. Hoyt 1979. Practical methods for estimating volume and fresh weight of birds eggs. Auk 96: 73–77. Google Scholar

14.

A. Järvinen , M. Pryl 1989. Egg dimensions of the Great Tit Parus major in southern Finland. Ornis Fenn. 66: 69–74. Google Scholar

15.

L. Jerzak , M. Bocheński , L. Kuczyński , P. Tryjanowski 2000. Repeatability of size and shape of eggs in the urban Magpie Pica pica (Passeriformes: Corvidae) population. Acta zool. Cracov. 43: 165–169. Google Scholar

16.

S. Kuźniak , G. Lorek 1993. [Birds of Wonieść Reservoir and surrounding areas (Western Poland)]. Prace Zakł. Biol, i Ekol. Ptaków UAM 2. Google Scholar

17.

C. M. Lessells , P. T. Boag 1987. Unrepeatable repeatabiles: a common mistake. Auk 104: 116–121. Google Scholar

18.

M. Ojanen 1983. Significance of variation in egg traits in birds, with special reference to Passerines. Acta Univ. Oulu 154 A, Biol. 20: 1–61. Google Scholar

19.

M. Ojanen , M. Orell , R. A. Vaisanen 1979. Role of heredity in egg size variation in the Great Tit Parus major and Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Ornis Scand. 10: 22–28. Google Scholar

20.

J. Potti 1993. Environmental, ontogenetic, and genetic variation in egg size of Pied Flycatchers. Can. J. Zool. 71: 1534–1542. Google Scholar

21.

L. Schifferli 1973. The effects of egg weight on the subsequent growth of nestling Great Tits Parus major. Ibis 138: 2–15. Google Scholar

22.

R. R. Sokal , F. J. Rohlf 1995. Biometry. Freeman, New York. Google Scholar

23.

J. Stępniewski 1995. Ausgewählte Aspecte der Brutbiologie der Bartmeise Panurus biarmicus: Beobachtungen am Loniweskie-See in West-Polen. Vogelwelt 116: 263–272. Google Scholar

24.

P. Tryjanowski , L. Kuczyński , M. Antczak , M. Skoracki , M. Hromada 2001. Within-clutch repeatability of egg dimensions in the jackdaw Corvus monedula: a study based on a museum collection. Biologia, Bratislava 56: 211–215. Google Scholar

25.

A. J. Van Noordvijk 1987. Quantitative ecological genetics of great tits. In: F. Cooke, P. A. Buckley (eds). Avian genetics. Academic Press, London, pp. 363–380. Google Scholar

26.

A. J. Van Noordwijk , L. C. P. Keizer , J. H. van Balen , W. Scharloo 1981. Genetic variation in egg dimensions in natural populations of Great Tit. Genetica 55: 221–232. Google Scholar

27.

H. Wawrzyniak , G. Sohns 1986. Die Bartmeise. Die Neue BrehmBücherei. A. Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenberg Lutherstadt. Google Scholar

28.

T. D. Williams 1994. Intraspecific variation in egg size and egg composition in birds: effects on offspring fitness. Biol. Rev. 68: 35–59. Google Scholar

29.

J. H. Zar 1999. Biostatistical analysis. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, New Yersey. Google Scholar

30.

P. Zduniak , M. Antczak 2003. Repeatability and within-clutch Variation in egg dimensions in a Hooded Crow Corvus corone cornix population. Biol. Lett. 40: 37–42. Google Scholar
Adrian Surmacki, Janusz Stępniewski, and Piotr Zduniak "Repeatability of Egg Dimensions within the Clutches of Bearded Tit Panurus biarmicus," Acta Ornithologica 38(2), 123-127, (1 December 2003). https://doi.org/10.3161/068.038.0209
Received: 1 October 2003; Accepted: 1 November 2003; Published: 1 December 2003
KEYWORDS
Bearded Tit
Biometry
clutch size
egg size
Panurus biarmicus
repeatability of egg dimensions
Back to Top