Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2005 Effects of Forest Management on Three-toed Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus Distribution in the Białowieża Forest (NE Poland): Conservation Implications
Tomasz Wesołowski, Dorota czeszczewik, Patryk Rowiński
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Distribution of Three-toed Woodpeckers and that of dead wood were mapped in two fragments of the Białowieża National Park (BNP) differing in their management history — primeval (old-growth stands of natural origin, no human intervention) and logged (as the former but subject to 80 years of commercial forestry). Data were collected during the breeding seasons 1999–2001. In the end of April 2000, the whole BNP was systematically searched; playbacks of drumming were used to enhance detection of birds. Presence/absence of Three-toed Woodpeckers and of dead wood (standing and downed Norway spruces and snags of other trees) were recorded within each forest sub-compartments (ca. 28 ha). Data from censuses done in smaller plots in 1975–1999 showed that in the primeval forest the woodpeckers bred twice more frequently in swampy and coniferous forests than in the oak-hornbeam habitat. These preferred habitat types covered larger areas in the logged fragment than in the primeval part (66% vs. 41%). Yet despite this, Three-toed Woodpeckers were recorded there over twice less frequently (14% of 176 sub-compartments) than in the primeval (36% of 164 sub-compartments) part. These differences followed sharp contrasts in the dead wood availability; all but one sub-compartments in the primeval fragment contained some form of dead wood, whereas dead spruces were missing in almost 30% of sub-compartments in the logged part. This was the effect of continuous “sanitary” logging, purposeful removal of dying and dead spruces from the Forest. To restore Three-toed Woodpecker habitats it is necessary to ban removal of dead spruces in the managed part of BNP. However, the BNP area is too small, to assure the long-term survival of the Białowieża Forest population. To achieve this, it is necessary to resign from removal of dying and dead spruces in the whole Polish part of the Białowieża Forest (600 km2). This would create breeding habitat for a maximum 260–320 pairs.

REFERENCES

1.

M. Amcoff , P. Eriksson 1996. Occurrence of three-toed woodpecker Picoides tridactylus at the scales of forest stand and landscape. Ornis Svec. 6: 107–119. Google Scholar

2.

Anonymous 1995. [Report on the status of the Białowieża Forest]. Regionalna Dyrekcja Lasów Państwowych, Białystok. Google Scholar

3.

Anonymous 1996. STATISTICA for Windows, Tulsa. Google Scholar

4.

A. Bobiec 2002. Living stands and dead wood in the Białowieża forest: suggestions for restoration management. Forest Ecol. Manage. 165: 125–140. Google Scholar

5.

A. Bobiec , der Burgt H. van , K. Meijer , C. Zuyderduyn 2000. Rich deciduous forests in Białowieża as a dynamic mosaic of developmental phases: premises for nature conservation and restoration management. Forest Ecol. Manage. 130: 159–175. Google Scholar

6.

R. Bütler , R. Schlaepfer 2001. Three-toed Woodpeckers as an alternative to bark beetle control by traps. In: P. Pechacek , W. d'Oleire-Oltmanns (eds). International Woodpecker Symposium. Nationalpark Berchtesgaden Forschungsbericht 48: 13–26. Google Scholar

7.

S. Cramp (ed.). 1985. The birds of the Western Palearctic. Vol. IV Oxford Univ. Press. Google Scholar

8.

J. B. Faliński 1986. Vegetation dynamics in temperate forests (Ecological studies in Białowieża Forest). W. Junk Publ., Dordrecht. Google Scholar

9.

U. N. Glutz von Blotzheim , K. M. Bauer 1980. Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Vol. IX. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Wiesbaden. Google Scholar

10.

J. Gutowski , A. Bobiec , P. Pawlaczyk , K. Zub 2004. [Second life of a tree]. WWF Polska, Warszawa. Google Scholar

11.

I. Hanski , M. Walsh 2004. How much, how to? — Practical tools for forest conservation. BirdLife European Forest Task Force, Helsinki. Google Scholar

12.

P. Pechacek 2004. Spacing behaviour of Eurasian Three-toed Woodpeckers (Piciodes tridactylus) during the breeding season in Germany. Auk 121: 58–67. Google Scholar

13.

K. Ruge 1997. Three-toed Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus. In: E. J. M. Hagemeijer , M. J. Blair (eds). The EBCC atlas of European breeding birds. T & AD Poyser, London, pp. 450–459. Google Scholar

14.

W. Scherzinger 1995. Naturschutz im Wald. Ulmer Verlag, Stuttgart. Google Scholar

15.

J. Siitonen 2001. Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organism: Fennoscadian boreal forests as an example. Ecol. Bull. 49: 11–41. Google Scholar

16.

M. E. Soulé 1987. Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge Univ. Press. Google Scholar

17.

L. Tomiałojć , T. Stawarczyk 2003. [The avifauna of Poland. Distribution, numbers and trends]. Vol. II. PTPP “pro Natura”, Wrocław. Google Scholar

18.

L. Tomiałojć , T. Wesołowski 1990. Bird communities of the primaeval temperate forest of Białowieża, Poland. In: A. Keast (ed.). Biogeography and ecology of forest bird communities. SPB Academic Publishing, Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 141–165. Google Scholar

19.

L. Tomiałojć , T. Wesołowski 1994. Die Stabilität der Vogelgemeinschaft in einem Urwald der gemässigten Zone: Ergebnisse einer 15jährigen Studie aus dem Nationalpark von Białowieża (Polen). Orn. Beob. 91: 73–110. Google Scholar

20.

L. Tomiałojć , T. Wesołowski 1996. Structure of a primaeval forest bird community during 1970s and 1990s (Białowieża National Park, Poland). Acta Ornithol. 31: 133–154. Google Scholar

21.

L. Tomiałojć , T. Wesołowski 2004. Diversity of the Białowieża Forest avifauna in space and time. J. Ornithol. 145: 81–92. Google Scholar

22.

L. Tomiałojć , T. Wesołowski , W. Walankiewicz 1984. Breeding bird community of a primaeval temperate forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland). Acta Ornithol. 20: 241–310. Google Scholar

23.

W. Walankiewicz 2002. The number and composition of snags in the pine-spruce stands of the Bialowieza National Park, Poland. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR 181: 489–500. Google Scholar

24.

W. Walankiewicz , D. Czeszczewik , C. Mitrus , E. Bida 2002. [Snag importance for woodpeckers in deciduous stands of the Białowieża Forest]. Notatki Ornitol. 43: 61–71. Google Scholar

25.

T. Wesołowski 2005. Picoides tridactylus (L., 1758). In: M. Gromadzki (ed.). [Guidelines for species and habitat conservation. Birds, part II]. Ministerstwo Środowiska, Warszawa. pp. 280–283. Google Scholar

26.

T. Wesołowski , D. Czeszczewik , C. Mitrus , P. Rowiński 2003. [Birds of the Białowieża National Park]. Notatki Ornitol. 44: 1–31. Google Scholar

27.

T. Wesołowski , L. Tomiałojć 1986. The breeding ecology of woodpeckers in a temperate primaeval forest — preliminary data. Acta Ornithol. 22: 1–22. Google Scholar

28.

T. Wesołowski , L. Tomiałojc , C. Mitrus , P. Rowiński , D. Czeszczewik 2002. Breeding bird community of a primeval temperate forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland) at the end of XXth century. Acta Ornithol. 37: 27–45. Google Scholar
Tomasz Wesołowski, Dorota czeszczewik, and Patryk Rowiński "Effects of Forest Management on Three-toed Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus Distribution in the Białowieża Forest (NE Poland): Conservation Implications," Acta Ornithologica 40(1), 53-60, (1 July 2005). https://doi.org/10.3161/068.040.0111
Received: 1 February 2005; Accepted: 1 May 2005; Published: 1 July 2005
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
conservation of endangered species
dead wood
Picoides tridactylus
primeval forest
snags
Three-toed Woodpecker
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top