Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2008 Two New Carboniferous Fertile Sphenophylls and their Spores from the Czech Republic
Author Affiliations +

Two new species of sphenophyllalean strobili with in situ spores are proposed from the Radnice Basin of the western and central Bohemian Carboniferous continental basins of the Czech Republic. Bowmanites brasensis sp. nov. from Břasy (Matylda Mine) and B. pseudoaquensis sp. nov. from Ovčín locality are determined mainly on the basis of their spores, which are about 100 µm in diameter. The thick-walled exine of the miospores is laevigate or sometimes very finely scabrate on the proximal contact area. Spores resemble the dispersed species Punctatisporites obesus. Cones of B. brasensis and B. pseudoaquensis are organically connected with stems having prominent blade leaves and represent a new group of sphenophyllalean strobili.


The majority of Carboniferous sphenophylls and their spores are stratigraphically important fossils. Some also have palaeoecological importance and can be used in palaeoenvironmental reconstructions. Carboniferous sphenophylls have been classified based on sterile parts of plants (mainly leaves) for many years. Several authors have proposed a large number of sphenophyllalean species, even though heterophylly is widespread. The systematics of “leafy” sphenophyllalean taxa consists of several species that are probably synonymous. Most sphenophyllalean cones with different modes of preservation (petrifactions and compressions) have been assigned only to the genus Bowmanites. The main criterion for their classification is the morphology/anatomy of the cones, the significance of their in situ spores having been ignored for many years. This contrasts with modern concepts of the classification of fossil reproductive organs where in situ spores are as important in taxonomic diagnoses and descriptions as their parent plants (e.g., Thomas 1970; Bek and Opluštil 2004, 2006). Authors following this concept have developed a new approach to the classification of Carboniferous sphenophyllalean fructifications based on a combination of morphological/anatomical features of the cones and their in situ spores (e.g., Bek 1998, 2004; Libertín and Bek 2003, 2006; Bek et al. in press). This new systematics represents a more natural classification and recognises seven groups (e.g., Libertín and Bek 2006) characterised by different cones and in situ spores. The current paper adds to our knowledge of a new group of sphenophyllalean plants. Studies of several specimens of compression strobili of Bowmanites brasensis sp. nov. and B. pseudoaquensis sp. nov. and slides with their in situ spores reveal a new type of sphenophyllalean spore.

Institutional abbreviation.

  • NMP, National Museum, Prague, Czech Republic;

  • WBMP, West Bohemian Museum in Pilsen.

History of research

Parent plants of Punctatisporites obesus-producing spores belong to the genus Sphenophyllum which was erected by Brongniart (1822) to formally accommodate fossil plants formerly included in Sphenophyllites. Presl (1838) was probably the first to describe a compression specimen of a sphenophyllalean cone, as Rotularia marsileafolia. Binney (1871) proposed the name Bowmanites for structureless fragments of sphenophyllalean cones, while Seward (1898) erected Sphenophyllostachys for cones of Sphenophyllum.

Sternberg (1823) described the sphenophyllalean plants Rotularia and Volkmannia from the Carboniferous of the Czech Republic. Bek (1998) and Bek and Opluštil (1998) were the first to describe in situ sphenophyllalean spores from the Czech Republic. There are two approaches for the subdivision and classification of sphenophyllalean cones. The first divides them into three groups (Jugati, Conferti, and Simplices) based on the number and position of sporangia on each sporangiophore (Hoskins and Cross 1943). The second approach was suggested by Remy (1955), who proposed four new cone genera of sphenophylls, Koinostachys, Aspidiostachys, Tristachya, and Anastachys, based on similar criteria with special attention to the number of sporangia. However, he also included some non-sphenophyllalean taxa (e.g., Anastachys). Both of these divisions united parent plants that produced monolete, trilete, and trilete operculate (vestispores and Pteroretis) spores in one group or one genus.

Fig. 1.

A. Geological profile of the Radnice Basin. B. Sketech map of the Czech Republic. C. Position of the Radnice Basin among other basins of the central and western Bohemian continental basins of the Czech Republic. D. Sketech map of the Radnice Basin with localities mentioned in the text.


Localities, material, and methods

The specimens WBMP-F 82, NMP-E 6124 (1484 in Bek and Opluštil 1998), and NMP-E 6293 are from Ovčín opencast mine while specimens WBMP-F 03760, WBMP-F 01334, and WBMP-F 00188 came from Břasy, Matylda Mine (both Radnice Basin, Czech Republic). The geographic positions of these localities are shown in Fig. 1. Digital photomicrographs and negatives of spores are stored in the Institute of Geology, Academy of Sciences v.v.i., Prague, whereas digital photographs of the cones and slides with spores are in the NMP. Spores were recovered by dissolving small portions of sporangia in 35 % hydrofluoric acid for 24 h and in nitric acid (40%) for 24–40 h, then cleared in KOH (5%) for 1 h. All spores were mounted in glycerine jelly for direct microscopic study. Some spores were examined with a CAMECA SX100 scanning electron microscope. Photomicrographs were taken using an Olympus C330s digital camera and a BX51 light microscope. The terms used for the descriptions of the in situ spores are the same as those in the latest edition of the Glossary of pollen and spore terminology (Punt et al. 2007). In situ spores were classified according to the system for dispersed spores suggested by Potonié and Kremp (1954, 1955), Dettmann (1963), and Smith and Butterworth (1967).

Systematic palaeontology

Order Sphenophyllales Seward, 1898
Family Sphenophyllaceae H. Potonié, 1893
Genus Bowmanites Binney, 1871

  • Type species: Bowmanites cambrensis Binney, 1871

  • Type locality: Pontypool, South Wales, Bensham, Seam, Jarrow; Viséan.

  • Bowmanites brasensis sp. nov.
    Figs. 2, 3.

  • Etymology: After Břasy, the type locality.

  • Type material: Holotype: NMP-E 6293; paratypes: WBMP-F 03760, WBMP-F 01334, and WBMP-F 00188.

  • Type locality: Břasy (Matylda Mine), Radnice Basin, Czech Republic.

  • Type horizon: Base of the Whetstone volcanic horizon, directly overlying the Lower Radnice Coal, Radnice Member, Radnice Basin, Kladno Formation, Lower Bolsovian, Pennsylvanian, Carboniferous.

  • Material.—Specimens NMP-E 6293, WBMP-F 03760, WBMP-F01334 and WBMP-F 00188 from the Břasy (Matylda Mine) locality.

  • Diagnosis.—Monopodially branched sterile stems with internodes. Leaves divided into three or four lobes with sharp tips. Six leaves in whorls. Strobili borne terminally. Circular sporangia. The surface of sporangia grooved, terminal sporangia among the axis and sterile bracts. Trilete circular to subcircular spores. Rays of trilete mark three-quarters of the radius. Exine 3–6 µm thick.

  • Description.—Shoots are branched monopodially (Fig. 2C, E) and from 0.5 to 4 mm wide but thicker at the nodes. The internodes are 2–5 mm long. The narrow, elongate leaves can be divided into three or four segments, each with a prominent sharp tip (Fig. 2A, D). Leaves are arranged in verticills (Fig. 2E), up to six, deeply divided along single vein. The length of lobes is 2–5 mm. Reproductive organs are terminally borne (Figs. 2B, 3A). The strobili are 40–60 mm long and their width, including bracts, is 5–6 mm. The cone axis is relatively narrow, approximately 0.5 mm wide (Fig. 3D). Circular sporangia 1 mm in diameter (Figs. 2B, 3B–D) are connected to the cone axis by sporangiophores about 0.2 mm long (Fig. 3B, C). The surface of the sporangia is prominently grooved. Sporangiophores with terminal sporangia lie between the axis and sterile bracts (Fig. 3D). Sterile bracts are 4–5 mm long, hook-shaped, prominently deflected at the area with sporangiophores. Trilete spores are circular to subcircular 88(96)106 µm in diameter. Inner body 75(88)100 µm in diameter. The spores are three-dimensionally preserved (Fig. 3E–H). The outer exine layer, probably exospore, is almost always broken or is not preserved (Fig. 3E–H). Its thickness is 3–6 µm (Fig. 3I). Almost all spores are, therefore, preserved as isolated circular trilete inner bodies about 88 µm on average.

  • Discussion.—All the spores are closely similar and are comparable to the dispersed species Punctatisporites obesus.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Radnice Member, Lower Bolsovian, Carboniferous, the Radnice Basin, Czech Republic.

  • Bowmanites pseudoaquensis sp. nov.
    Figs. 46.

  • 1998 Sphenophyllostachys aquensis (Remy) Boureau 1964; Bek 1998: 87–90, pl. 83.

  • 1998 Sphenophyllostachys aquensis (Remy) Boureau 1964; Bek and Opluštil 1998: 149–150, pl. 4: 8–10.

  • Etymology: The morphology of the holotype closely resembles cones of Sphenophyllostachys aquensis.

  • Holotype: NMP-E 6124.

  • Type locality: Ovčín opencast mine, near Radnice, Radnice Basin, Czech Republic.

  • Type horizon: Base of the Whetstone volcanic horizon, directly overlying the Lower Radnice Coal, Radnice Member, Kladno Formation, the Radnice Basin, lower Bolsovian, Pennsylvanian; Carboniferous.

  • Material.—Holotype (NMP-E 6124), and specimen NMP-E 6293 from Ovčín opencast mine, Radnice Basin.

  • Diagnosis.—Twelve lanceolate leaves per whorl. Tips of leaves pointed. Circular sporangia, sterile bracts arch-like bend apically. Subcircular to circular trilete spores. Thick-walled exine laevigate to finely scabrate.

  • Description.—Stems are monopodially branched, 1–2 mm wide with internodes 2–8 mm long and 1–3 mm wide (Fig. 6A, B, D). Leaves are 4–8 mm with narrow lanceolate margins (Fig. 6 C) and arranged in whorls (Fig. 4A, B2). Cones are 200 mm long and 4–5 mm wide and possess an apex with sterile leaves. Circular sporangia are about 1.5–2 mm in diameter (Figs. 4A3, 5A, G, 6E). Sporangia occur between the axis of the cone and sterile bract on reduced sporangiophores (Fig. 5A, G). The surface of sporangia is finely rugose. Sterile bracts are hook-shaped; the apical margins are slightly wider at the end with rounded tips. Sterile stems are 1.0–2.5 mm in diameter.

    Trilete spores are 110(121)150 µm in diameter (Fig. 5B–F). Circular to subcircular amb, simple laesurae, 1/2–2/3 of the radius. Exine laevigate to finely scabrate at the proximal contact area, 5–9 µm thick (Fig. 5B–F).

    Remarks.—All the spores are closely similar and can be identified as Punctatisporites cf. obesus because the sculpture of the exine is sometimes very finely scabrate (Fig. 5E, F) and not laevigate as given in original diagnosis of P. obesus (Potonié and Kremp 1954).

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Radnice Member, Kladno Formation, Lower Bolsovian, Radnice Basin, Czech Republic.

  • Discussion of the spores

    Dispersed Punctatisporites .—The dispersed spore genus Punctatisporites consists of several different spore types. Some species possess a relatively thin (e.g., P. minutus) or thicker exine (e.g., P. breviornatus). The exine of some species is laevigate (e.g., P. calvus), microgranulate (e.g., P. irrasus), vermiculate (e.g., P. vermiculatus), echinate-spinate (e.g., P. decorus), infrareticulate (P. nervatus), setate (P. setulosus) or possesses a ridge (P. sinuatus). The smallest spores of Punctatisporites are only about 14 µm in diameter, while the largest can reach 140 µm in diameter. Punctatisporites was proposed by Ibrahim (1933) and emended by Potonié and Kremp (1954) for spores with a variable exine sculpture (laevigate, punctate, microreticulate or microgranulate). For example, Guennel (1958) considered that all species with a sculptured exine (like P. punctatus, the type species of the genus) should be separated taxonomically. Punctatisporites today consists of several miospore morphotypes and it is evident that the genus is highly heterogenous and represents an artificial taxon. This presumption is supported by the extremely long stratigraphic ranges of the morphologically simplest spores. The first rare records of spores of this type are from the Silurian, more frequently occuring in the Devonian and becoming more abundant in the Carboniferous (Bek 1998).

    Fig. 2.

    Carboniferous (Bolsovian) fertile sphenophyll Bowmanites brasensis sp. nov., NMP-E 6352, Matylda Mine, Břasy, Radnice Basin, Kladno Formation, Radnice Member. A. Stem with leaves divided twice and three times. B. Cone and stem. C. Monopodially branched stem with leaves. D. Detail of twice divided leaves. E. Monopodially branched stem with leaves arranged in verticils.


    Fig. 3.

    Carboniferous (Bolsovian) fertile sphenophyll Bowmanites brasensis sp. nov., WBMP-F 03760 Matylda Mine, Břasy, Radnice Basin, Kladno Formation, Radnice Member. A. General view of the cone. B. Detail showing the position of sporangia with in situ spores (arrows) on the sporangiophore. C. Detail of in situ spores (arrows) in sporangia. Note the length of the sporangiophore. D. Position of sporangia between sterile bracts and the axis of a cone. E. Central body of a spore of Punctatisporites obesus-type; lateral view. F, G. Central bodies of spores of Punctatisporites obesus-type. Note the trilete mark and labrum. H. Central body of a spore of Punctatisporites obesus-type; distal view. I. Spore with exospore assigned to the dispersed species Punctatisporites obesus (Loose) Potonié and Kremp, 1954; proximal view.


    Fig. 4.

    Carboniferous (Bolsovian) fertile sphenophyll Bowmanites pseudoaquensis sp. nov., Ovčín opencast mine, Radnice Basin, Kladno Formation, Radnice Member. A. NMP-E 6123, general view of sterile stems with leaves arranged in verticils (A1); detail showing lanceolate leaves (A2); detail of nine lanceolate leaves arranged in verticils (A3). B. NMP-E 6124; cone with sterile apex (B1); detail of leafy stem (B2).


    Fig. 5.

    Carboniferous (Bolsovian) fertile sphenophyll Bowmanites pseudoaquensis sp. nov., NMP-E 6124, Ovčín opencast mine, Radnice Basin, Kladno Formation, Radnice Member (A, G) and their spores of of Punctatisporites obesus-type (B–F). A. Detail showing the position of sporangia. Note that one sporangium occurs per sporangiophore between the sterile bract and the axis of a cone. B, D. Spores of Punctatisporites obesus-type; distal surfaces, SEM micrographs. C, E, F. Spore of Punctatisporites obesus-type. Proximal views. Note finely scabrate sculpture on the proximal surface (E, F) and slightly developed labrum. G. Detail of sub-terminally located sporangium on shortened sporangiophore.


    Fig. 6.

    Carboniferous (Bolsovian) fertile sphenophyll Bowmanites pseudoaquensis sp. nov., NMP-E 6358, holotype, Ovčín opencast mine, Radnice Basin, Kladno Formation, Radnice Member. A. General view of the holotype showing sterile axis, leaves and several cones. B. Leaves on the central axis. C. Detail of the leaf tips. D. Leaves on the central axis. E. Terminal position of the cone.


    Some dispersed Punctatisporites species are more or less similar to P. obesus, like P. limbatus, P. labiatus, P. pseudobesus, P. edgarensis, or P. bifurcatus. Laevigatisporites laevigatus and the Permian genus Callumispora may be also be similar.

    In situ Punctatisporites.—In situ spores of the Punctatisporites-type have been described from fructifications of plant species of different stratigraphic ages and taxonomic positions. The oldest in situ record of similar simple spores was published by Hoeg (1967) from a Devonian member of the Trimerophytophytina. Boureau (1964) mentioned in situ spores of the Calamospora—Punctatisporites-type from a sphenopsid cone (Cheirostrobus pettycurensis). The most abundant Punctatisporites-producing plants were ferns and fern-like plants, mainly genera like Corynepteris, Stauropteris, Pecopteris, Scolecopteris, Asterotheca, and Radstockia (Balme 1995; Bek 1998). Similar in situ spores are reported also from parent plants of Triassic—Jurassic (Potonié 1962), Cretaceous (Krassilov 1982) and even Eocene (Balme 1995) age. Dispersed species of Punctatisporites are far more numerous than those reported in situ. Some spores of the Punctatisporites-type may even represent ontogenetic stages of marattialean microspores of the Cyclogranisporites—Verrucosisporites-type (Zodrow et al. 2006).

    Table 1.

    Comparison of measurements of Bowmanites brasensis sp. nov., Bowmanites pseudoaquensis sp. nov., and Sphenophyllostachys aquensis Remy, 1955.



    The strobili of Bowmanites brasensis and B. pseudoaquensis are morphologically similar to Sphenophyllostachys aquensis Remy, 1955 (see Table 1) but differ mainly in their spore contents. In situ spores isolated from the type specimen of S. aquensis by Remy (1955) are laevigate, thin-walled and correspond with the dispersed genus Calamospora, while in situ spores of B. brasensis and B. pseudoaquensis are thick-walled and are assigned to a different spore genus, Punctatisporites.

    In situ spores of both of the new Bohemian species correspond to the dispersed species Punctatisporites obesus. In situ spores isolated from the specimen assigned to B. pseudoaquensis (former S. aquensis) by Bek and Opluštil (1998) differ slightly in total diameter (120 µm on average) compared with spores of Bowmanites brasensis. It is evident that the Bohemian specimens, early wrongly assigned to S. aquensis by Bek and Opluštil (1998), differ from the holotype of S. aquensis and represent a new species.

    The cone morphologies of Bowmanites pseudoaquensis, B. brasensis, and S. aquensis are only roughly similar. Sterile bracts of Bowmanites brasensis are distinctly dichotomously divided, but bracts of B. pseudoaquensis and S. aquensis are simple and lanceolate. The angle between the axis of the cone and bracts of S. aquensis is larger than in B. pseudoaquensis. Bracts of S. aquensis possess a prominent S-like shape, while bracts of B pseudoaquensis are straighter and those of B. brasensis curve apically two-thirds of their length from the point of attachment. Sporangiophores of B. pseudoaquensis and S. aquensis are relatively short, undivided and their sporangia are borne terminally. Sporangiophores of B. brasensis are relatively long (2 mm) and bear sub-terminal sporangia (Fig. 3C). Sphenophyllostachys aquensis is reported (Remy 1955) from the Duckmantian of Germany (Schacht Adolf locality) whereas Bohemian specimens are from the Bolsovian (Whetstone horizon) of the Radnice Basin.

    There is no evidence of heterophylly comparable to that reported in Sphenophyllum tenerrimum and S. myriophyllum. The general habit is similar to S. trichomatosum, but B. brasensis does not possess trichome bases of the stem.

    Similar laevigate, thick-walled spores have never been reported in situ from any Carboniferous fructifications.

    Division of Punctatisporites spores into natural groups would be facilitated by a good knowledge of their parent plants and/or an accurate grouping of morphologically similar spore types into a few new independent spore groups/genera (according to their sculpture, diameter and exine thickness). This is needed because Punctatisporites is probably the most variable Carboniferous dispersed spore genus known.

    It is possible to divide Carboniferous sphenophylls into seven groups based on their in situ spore types and different morphologies and anatomies of the cones (Libertín and Bek 2006). Spores isolated from Bowmanites brasensis and B. pseudoaquensis do not correspond with any members of these groups and represent a new group of Carboniferous sphenophyllalean plants. Their special position is based mainly on their in situ spores. This suggests that the previous classifications of sphenophyllalean cones given by Hoskins and Cross (1943) and Remy (1955) need basic revision because these classifications group together plants that produce different spores (e.g., monolete versus trilete) and overlook the significance of in situ spores. We are currently working on a new classification of Carboniferous fertile specimens of sphenophylls. This revision will be based not only on the morphology of the cones, but also on their in situ spores, underlining the necessity of collaboration between palaeobotanists and palynologists.


    We acknowledge financial support from the Grant Agency of the Academy of Sciences v.v.i. of the Czech Republic (projects A 3013902 and A 3001130503). Special thanks are due to Jiřina Dašková (Laboratory of Paleobiology and Palaeoecology, Institute of Geology v.v.i., Academy of Science, Prague, Czech Republic) and Duncan McLean (University of Sheffield, UK).


    1. B.A. Balme 1995. Fossil in situ spores and pollen grains: An annotated catalogue. Review of Paleobotany and Palynology 87: 81–323. Google Scholar

    2. J. Bek 1998. Spore Populations of Some Plants of Groups Lycophyta, Sphenophyta, Pteridophyta and Progymnospermophyta from Carboniferous Limnic Basins of the Czech Republic. 505 pp. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Institute of Geology, Academy of Science, Prague. Google Scholar

    3. J. Bek 2004. Carboniferous sphenophyllalean spores and their parent plants. Abstracts of 2004 Central European Meeting IGCP 469, 9. Freiberg. Google Scholar

    4. J. Bek , M. Libertin , B. Owens , D. McLean , and M. Oliwkiewicz-Miklasińska (in press). The first compression Pteroretis-producing cones, Pennsylvanian of the Czech Republic. Review of Palaeobotany and PalynologyGoogle Scholar

    5. J. Bek and S. Opluštil 1998. Some lycopsid, sphenopsid and pteropsid fructifications and their miospores from the Upper Carboniferous basins of the Bohemian Massif. Palaeontographica B 248: 127–161. Google Scholar

    6. J. Bek and S. Opluštil 2004. Palaeoecological constraints of some Lepidostrobus cones and their parent plants from the Late Palaeozoic continental basins of the Czech Republic. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 131: 49–89. Google Scholar

    7. J. Bek and S. Opluštil 2006. Six rare Lepidostrobus species from the Pennsylvanian of the Czech Republic and their bearing on the classification of lycospores. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 139: 211–236. Google Scholar

    8. E.W. Binney 1871. Observations on the structure of the fossil plant found in the Carboniferous strata, Part 2. Lepidostrobus and some allied cones. Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society 1871: 33–62. Google Scholar

    9. E. Boureau 1964. Traité de Paléobotanique, III, Sphenophyta, Noeggerathiophyta. 544 pp. Masson et Cie, Paris. Google Scholar

    10. A. Brongniart 1822. Sur la classification et la distribution des végétaux fossiles en général, et sur ceux des terrains de sédiment supérieur en particulier. Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle 8: 203–348. Google Scholar

    11. M.E. Dettmann 1963. Upper Mesozoic microfloras from south-eastern Australia. Proceedings of Royal Society of Victoria 77: 1–148. Google Scholar

    12. G.K. Guennel 1958. Miospore analysis of the Pottsville coals of Indiana. Bulletin of Indiana Department of Conservation, Geological Survey 13: 1–101. Google Scholar

    13. O.A. Hoeg 1967. Psilophyta, In : E. Boureau (ed.), Traité de Paléobotanique, II, Bryophyta, Psilophyta, Lycophyta , 362–399. Masson et Cie, Paris. Google Scholar

    14. J.H. Hoskins and A.T. Cross 1943. Monograph of the Paleozoic cone genus Bowmanites (Sphenophyllales). American Midland Naturalist 30: 47–148. Google Scholar

    15. A.C. Ibrahim 1933. Spore forms of the Ägir Horizon of the Ruhr Basin. 46 pp. Trilstch. Würzburg. Google Scholar

    16. V.A. Krassilov 1982. Early Cretaceous flora of Mongolia. Palaeontographica B 181: 1–43. Google Scholar

    17. M. Libertín and J. Bek 2003. The revision of sphenophyllalean cones and their spores from the Pennsylvanian continental basis of the Czech Republic. Abstracts of the XVth International Congress on Carboniferous and Permian Stratigraphy, 335. Leiden. Google Scholar

    18. M. Libertín and J. Bek 2006. Proposal of the new classification of Palaeozoic sphenophyllalean cones. Abstracts of the XIIth European Palaeobotany Palynology Conference, 82. Prague. Google Scholar

    19. H. Potonié 1893. Über die Sphenophyllaceen. Naturwissenschafen Wochenschriften 8: 219–220. Google Scholar

    20. R. Potonié 1962. Synopsis der Sporae in situ. Beihafte der Geologische Jahrbuch 52: 1–204. Google Scholar

    21. R. Potonié and G. Kremp 1954. Die Gattungen der Palaözoischen Sporae dispersae und ihre Stratigraphie. Geologische Jahrbuch 69: 111–193. Google Scholar

    22. R. Potonié and G. Kremp 1955. Die Sporae dispersae des Ruhrkarbons ihre Morphographie und Stratigraphie mit Ausblicken auf Arten anderer Gebiete und Zeitabschnitte. Teil I. Palaeontographica B 98: 1–136. Google Scholar

    23. K. Presl 1838. Versuch einer geognostichen botanischen Darstellung der Flore der Vorwelt. Vol. 2, 7/8. 39 pp. Tentamen, Leipzig. Google Scholar

    24. W. Punt , P.P. Hoen , S. Blackmore , S. Nilsson , and A. LeThomas 2007. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 143: 1–81. Google Scholar

    25. W. Remy 1955. Untersuchungen von kohlig erhaltenen fertilen und strilen Sphenophyllen und Formen unsicherer systematischer Stellung. Abhandlungen Deutschen Akademie Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Klasse für Chemie and Biologie 1: 5–40. Google Scholar

    26. A.C. Seward 1898. Fossil Plants. Vol. 1. 245 pp. Cambridge University Press, London. Google Scholar

    27. A.H.V. Smith and M.A. Butterworth 1967. Miospores in the coal seams of the Carboniferous of Great Britain. Special Papers in Palaeontology 1: 1–324. Google Scholar

    28. K. Sternberg 1823. Versuch einer geognostichen botanischen Darstellung der Flore der Vorwelt. 39 pp. Tentamen, Leipzig. Google Scholar

    29. B.A. Thomas 1970. A new specimen of Lepidostrobus binneyanus from the Westphalian Bof Yorkshire. Pollen et Spores 12: 217–234. Google Scholar

    30. E.L. Zodrow , Z. Šimůnek , Ch.J. Cleal , J. Bek , and J. Pšenička 2006. Taxonomic revision of the Palaeozoic marattialean fern Acitheca Schimper. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 138: 239–280. Google Scholar

    Milan Libertín, Jiří Bek, and Jana Drábková "Two New Carboniferous Fertile Sphenophylls and their Spores from the Czech Republic," Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 53(4), (1 December 2008).
    Published: 1 December 2008
    10 PAGES

    Back to Top