Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2012 Large Theropod Dinosaur Footprint Associations in Western Gondwana: Behavioural and Palaeogeographic Implications
Karen Moreno, Silvina de Valais, Nicolás Blanco, Andrew J. Tomlinson, Javier Jacay, Jorge O. Calvo
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

In modern terrestrial ecosystems, the population size of large predators is low, and a similar pattern has usually been assumed for dinosaurs. However, fossil finds of monospecific, large theropod accumulations suggest that population dynamics were more complex. Here, we report two Early Cretaceous tracksites dominated by large theropod footprints, in Querulpa Chico (Peru) and Chacarilla (Chile). The two sites correspond to distinct depositional environments—tidal basin/delta (Querulpa Chico) and meandering river (Chacarilla)—with both subject to extensive arid or semiarid palaeoclimatic conditions. Although most trackways show no preferred orientation, a clear relationship between two trackmakers is observed in one instance. This observation, coupled with the high abundance of trackways belonging to distinct large theropods, and the exclusion of tracks of other animals, suggests some degree of grouping behaviour. The presence of freshwater sources in a dry climate and perhaps social behaviour such as pair bonding may have promoted interactions between large carnivores. Further, the occurrence of these two tracksites confirms that large theropod dinosaurs, possibly spinosaurids and/or carcharodontosaurids, existed on the western margin of Gondwana as early as the earliest Cretaceous.

Introduction

In general, population densities of large, carnivorous animals are expected to be low in any terrestrial environment, especially for animals with high metabolic rates (Colinvaux 1978). Indeed, if large predators were abundant, they would need such large amounts of prey biomass that any given ecosystem could not be maintained for long. Their feeding reserves (mainly primary consumers: herbivores) would be reduced and they would be driven to extinction. This is why trophic webs are often represented as pyramids with predators at the top, primary consumers (potential prey items) at intermediate levels, and primary producers at the base (e.g., Gotelli 2008). Many assumptions have been made on how faunal equilibrium constrains variables such as population growth, climate, geography, and behaviour. One example is the sustainability of predatory packs compared to isolated hunters (Farlow 1993), in which large carnivorous animals are unlikely to hunt as packs because the resources demanded would negatively impact the population size of the prey and require a larger home range for the pack.

Non-avian theropod dinosaurs, which were presumably predatory, may have exhibited similar ecological dynamics. Cretaceous theropods include the largest (up to 14 m long) terrestrial predators of all time, such as Carcharodontosaurus (Stromer 1931), Spinosaurus (Stromer 1915, 1934; Sereno et al. 1996), Giganotosaurus (Coria and Salgado 1995; Calvo and Coria 1998), Mapusaurus (Coria and Currie 2006), and Tyrannotitan (Novas et al. 2005). Such extremely large carnivorous dinosaurs have been found nearly worldwide, and palaeoecological inferences for them are diverse and often contradictory, mainly because of the lack of modern analogues. Even though potential prey animals for these large theropods were abundant (sauropod and ornithopod dinosaurs, pterosaurs, fish, etc.), statistical estimates based on fossil bones indicate low abundances of these carnivore dinosaurs in most Mesozoic faunas (e.g., White et al. 1998). However, rare, almost monospecific bone accumulations of large theropods suggest that at least some of these animals were probably gregarious (Currie 1998; Porfiri et al. 2007; Currie and Eberth 2010), contradicting initial assumptions of faunal equilibrium. To explain this disparity, scavenging, rather than predation, has been hypothesized as a food-gathering strategy for the theropods (Ruxton and Houston 2003).

Fig. 1.

Location of the large theropod trackbeds: track 1 indicates the Querulpa Chico locality while track 2 indicates the Chacarilla locality.

f01_73.jpg

Dinosaur tracksite data provide useful complementary constraints on the problem of population density and behaviour of large predators (e.g., Lockley and Hunt 1995). Vertebrate footprints are abundant in the fossil record, more than body fossils, because they are generated repeatedly during the daily activities of an animal. Also, footprints cannot be transported or significantly reworked, and therefore they capture behaviours in environments in which the trackmakers lived. Dinosaur herding or other group behaviours have been inferred from several tracksites worldwide. However, the majority of these findings pertain to sauropods, basal iguanodontians and hadrosaurids (e.g., Ostrom 1972; Thulborn and Wade 1984; Farlow et al. 1989; Lockley et al. 1994; Lockley and Hunt 1995; Farlow and Chapman 1997; Lockley 1998; Day et al. 2002; Lockley et al. 2002). Almost defined pack structures of small and medium theropods have also been observed (e.g., Ostrom 1972; Lockley and Matsukawa 1999; Rogers 2002, Barco et al. 2006, Li et. al 2007). Recent morphological analyses of skulls indicate that a large number of these small-medium theropod families may have been herbivorous (Zanno and Makovicky 2011), which would have favoured gregarious behaviour. In contrast, large theropod footprints (anteroposterior length >0.3 m) and trackways are usually sparse in comparison with ichnites from any other dinosaur (e.g., Alonso and Marquillas 1986; Calvo 1991; Leonardi and Spezzamonte 1994; Lockley and Hunt 1994; Thulborn 2001; Mossman et al. 2003; Leonardi and Santos 2004; Boutakiout et al. 2009). Yet, theropod trackways are occasionally found associated with herbivorous dinosaur trackways with a configuration that suggests hunters following preys (Bird 1985; Farlow et al. 1989, Lockley and Hunt 1995).

To document further the behaviour of large theropod dinosaurs, we describe in this contribution two South American tracksites located in Querulpa Chico (Peru) and about 500 km away in Chacarilla (Chile) (Fig. 1). The two sites are estimated to date from the Early Cretaceous. As we discuss below, our observations reveal some level of grouping behaviour for large theropod dinosaurs. Moreover, the occurrence of these two tracksites confirms previous evidence for a geographic distribution of large theropod dinosaurs on the western margin of Gondwana (Moreno et al. 2004). In the absence of bones in the fossil record, these tracksites are the sole indication for the presence in this region of spinosaurids and carcharodontosaurids, the potential trackmakers known in South America during the Cretaceous (e.g., Coria and Salgado 1995; Kellner and Campos 1996; Coria and Currie 2002, 2006; Candeiro et al. 2004; Novas et al. 2005; Medeiros 2006; Salgado et al. 2009).

Institutional abbreviations.—MUSM, Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Departamento de Paleontología, Lima, Peru; SGOPV, Museo Nacional de Historia Natural Santiago, Chile; SNGM, Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería (SERNAGEOMIN), Santiago, Chile.

Geological setting

During the Early and Middle Jurassic, the deposition of marine sequences in northern Chile (Tarapacá Basin) and southern Peru (Arequipa Basin) was controlled by post-rift thermal subsidence and global sea-level fluctuations (Ardill et al. 1998). In contrast, during the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous, the Pacific plate converged and subducted against the western margin of Gondwana (Coira et al. 1982; Ramos and Kay 1991; Mpodozis and Allmendinger 1992). This event caused regional uplift in the southern Andes and back-arc basin extension of the northern and central Andes (Eppinger and Rosenfeld 1996; Ardill et al. 1998). As a result of this tectonic evolution, northern Chile and southern Peru experienced a widespread marine regression near the end of the Jurassic, followed by deposition of continental red-bed sequences during the Early Cretaceous (Rutland 1971; Bogdanic 1990). It was during this last phase of basin sedimentation that the large theropod trackways investigated in this study were recorded.

Fig. 2.

Schematic Mesozoic chronostratigraphy for the Hualhuani and Chacarilla formations, with the expected relative positions of the track-bearing strata.

f02_73.jpg

Querulpa Chico tracksite, Peru.—The Querulpa Chico tracksite is located about 70 km northwest of the city of Arequipa, southern Peru (Fig. 1). The track-bearing beds belong to the sedimentary Hualhuani Formation, which is among the uppermost units of the Yura Group (e.g., Sempere et al. 2004). The 1500 m-thick Hualhuani Formation is dominated by cross-bedded quartzose sandstones and shales (Guizado 1968; Rodriguez et al. 2005). These sediments were deposited along a beach that included both extensive tidal flats and deltaic environments (Jacay et al. 2006). The Hualhuani Formation unconformably overlies the Gramadal Formation, which is Tithonian (Late Jurassic) in age (Benavides 1962). Since it is overlain by the Murco Formation, which is late Early Cretaceous in age (Jenks 1948; Rodriguez et al. 2005), the Hualhuani Formation is most likely Neocomian, i.e., Early Cretaceous (e.g., Sempere et al. 2004; Jacay et al. 2006). The strata at the tracksite are oriented 70° NE and tilted 36° SE as a consequence of north-northwestward tectonic deformation. There are three track-bearing levels within a 20 m-thick sequence in the lower part of the unit. As shown in Fig. 2, preliminary data about the local palaeoenvironment are indicative of a tidal basin (Jacay et al. 2006).

Chacarilla tracksite, Chile.—The Chacarilla tracksite investigated here is one of several tracksites located in the Chacarilla Formation in an eponymous canyon about 40 km southeast of the town of Pica (Galli and Dingman 1962; Fig. 1). Galli and Dingman (1962) referred to this particular tracksite as their “second locality” with theropod and ornithopod footprints. Rubilar-Rogers et al. (2008) recently described in detail the theropod tracks from this site and referred to it as “Chacarilla III”. The Chacarilla Formation is entirely sedimentary with a minimum exposed thickness of 1100 m. It is divided in two unnamed units: a lower marine unit (Oxfordian; Galli and Dingman 1962), and an upper continental unit, in which the dinosaur footprints are recorded. This last unit is overlain by clastic sedimentary and volcanic rocks of the Cerro Empexa Formation (Late Cretaceous—Paleocene; Galli and Dingman 1962; Tomlinson et al. 2001) in an angular unconformity. The continental unit is intruded by Cenomanian-age dikes and plutons (99–94 Ma; Hammerschmidt et al. 1992). In addition, an unpublished Ar40/Ar39 plateau age on hornblende from an andesite lava, of 114.3 ± 2.0 Ma (2-sigma), taken at the sedimentary sequence of Cuesta de Montecristo Sequence (unpublished data, AJT) which conformably overlies Chacarilla-correlative, continental red-beds northeast of Antofagasta (Moreno et al. 2004), suggests that the Chacarilla Formation is not younger than Aptian. Combined, these observations indicate an age range of Late Jurassic to late Early Cretaceous for the entire Chacarilla Formation. The track-bearing beds are located near the top of the formation. They constitute a 140-m thick layer of interbedded shale and red sandstone (Fig. 2), which were deposited in point bars and floodplains of a meandering river environment (Blanco et al. 2000). Given the presence of large ornithopod footprints, the track-bearing unit has been assigned a maximum Early Cretaceous age (Blanco et al. 2000). The dinosaur footprints are in mudstone of the floodplain facies and occur along with plant remains and rooted stump casts. Sedimentary structures in this unit, such as complex channels, indicate palaeoflow toward the west-southwest.

Material and methods

All tracks from the Querulpa Chico and Chacarilla localities are preserved as negative epichnia (concave impressions). We took the following in situ measurements: pace and stride length, pace angulation, trackway direction, and footprint anteroposterior length and mediolateral width (Fig. 3, Table 1). In addition, we made latex molds and plaster casts of the best-preserved footprints. A cast of a Peruvian footprint is stored in MUSM (MUSM 1679); casts of the Chilean footprints are stored at SERNAGEOMIN (SNGM-311 to 317) and at SGOPV (SGOPV 1042 to 1047). The theropod identities of the trackmakers were established using traits that distinguish theropod from ornithopod tracks as outlined by Thulborn (1990) and Farlow and Chapman (1997).

Theropod dinosaur footprints.—Typically tridactyl, mesaxonic, with the impression of digit III considerably larger than either digit II or IV; digits divergent; presence of claw marks with sharp edges that are medially directed for digits II and III and laterally directed for digit IV; presence of an indentation along the medial margin of the footprint (at the base of digit II). Occasionally, theropod footprints exhibit tarsometatarsal impressions, which elongate the posterior margin of the ichnites, and/or hallux (digit I) impressions as a narrow mark at the base of digit II.

Large ornithopod dinosaur footprints.—Tridactyl, mesaxonic, with the lengths of digits II, III, and IV only slightly different; wide digits with rounded ends; digits converge praximally into a broad metatarsophalangeal impression (“heel pad”). Ornithopod ichnites are similar in anteroposterior and mediolateral dimensions, and their general shapes resemble a clover.

Description of the theropod dinosaur footprints

Querulpa Chico tracksite, Peru.—Eleven trackways, labelled A to K, comprising at least 67 footprints are exposed in the main trackbed (Figs. 4, 5; Table 1). Seven of the trackways (A, B, D–G, and I) consist of large theropod footprints, most of them well preserved. Footprints in these trackways are tridactyl or tetradactyl and mesaxonic, with length and width ranging between 51–65 cm and 41–54 cm, respectively. When present, hallux impressions are laterally directed. Almost all digits bear claw marks but lack clear digital pad impressions. The stride length ranges between 230 and 297 cm while the pace angulation varies between 133° and 166°. The other four trackways (C, H, J, and K) consist of smaller tridactyl theropod footprints, most of which are poorly preserved; a notable exception is footprint C4 (Fig. 5). These footprints are almost as wide as long (25–28 cm long and 26–28 cm wide). Although, the absence of morphological details precludes a confident description of the tracks, it is clear that they belong to theropod dinosaurs given the presence of claw marks and the fact that digit III is about 20–30% longer than digit II and IV. The average divarication angle between digits II and IV is 62°, ranging from 46° to 77°, which is also typical of theropods. The trackways are relatively narrow and have high pace angulations (166–173°); the stride length varies between 210 and 285 cm. Eight of the eleven trackways exhibit a preferred east-west orientation. Trackways B, C, D, and E head eastward and trackways F, H, I, and K head westward. In contrast, trackways A and G head south and trackway J heads north.

Fig. 3.

Measurements taken in situ on footprints and trackways. Anteroposterior track length: distance between the distal tip of digit III and the proximal boundary of the sole; mediolateral track width: distance between the distal tip of lateral digits measured perpendicular to the track axis; pace angle: angle formed by the two segments joining three consecutive tracks; pace, distance between two consecutive tracks; stride length: distance between two consecutive tracks on the same side (left or right) of the trackway.

f03_73.jpg

There are variations in footprint morphology between different trackways, but also within the same trackway due to differences in substrate consistency (Jackson et al. 2010), pedal kinematics, and timing between the passings of trackmakers. For example, in trackway A, the longest trackway (12 footprints), the first eight footprints (A1–A8) are deeper than the subsequent footprints and have hallux impressions. Footprints A1–A4 have wide digit impressions, while footprints A5–A8 have digit impressions about a third narrower. The remaining A9–A12 footprints are tridactyl and display wide, posterior imprints (Figs. 4, 5). Track overprinting indicates that trackway A was later crossed by trackway D, which is also composed of footprints with hallux impressions. Trackway D displays long, deep tarsometatarsal impressions (Figs. 4, 5), a feature that is absent from the other trackways. Trackway F, which was registered later (based on track overprinting), is composed of shallow and narrow tridactyl footprints (Figs. 4, 5). The presence of displacement rims on some of the footprints (Fig. 5) indicates that the trackbed was one of the closest layers to the surface on which the animals walked (Allen 1997; Gatesy 2003). However, further confirmation of the layer as actual track surface is lacking due to the absence of other key indicators, such as skin impressions or sediment ejections.

Table 1.

Measurements of theropod footprints and trackways from Querulpa Chico and Chacarilla. Hip height calculated as 4.5 and 4.9 times the footprint length for small and large theropods, respectively (Thulborn, 1989). Speed estimated according to Alexander (1976): speed (km/h) = 2.817 × (stride in m) 1.67 × (hip height in m)-1.17. N, the number of footprints in the trackway; SD, standard deviation.

t01_73.gif

We estimated the speed of theropod locomotion using the equation by Alexander (1976) derived from observations of modern animals and the conversion factor between foot length and hip height recommended by Thulborn (1989) for theropods. The results of the calculation shown in Table 1 indicate that large theropods were probably walking (3 to 5 km/h), while small theropods were moving about 2–3 times faster (8 to 14 km/h).

Chacarilla tracksite, Chile.—The fourteen trackways of the Chacarilla III tracksite consist of 76 individual footprints (Fig. 6). Two of the trackways (numbered 1 and 7) consist of large ornithopod footprints (average footprint length 39 cm and average width 32 cm). Two other trackways (17 and 18) consist of small theropod footprints (<25 cm long). The other ten trackways (3–6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16) were made by large theropods (footprint length >30 cm). The large theropod tracks are tri- and tetradactyl, mesaxonic, and have length and width between 31–65 cm and 21–46 cm, respectively. As with the theropod tracks from Peru, nearly all digit impressions possess claw marks, but they lack clear impressions of digital pads. The stride length varies between 230–307 cm, a range that is similar to the one derived for large theropods in the Querulpa Chico tracksite. The pace angle is 179 ± 2°, which is about 10% higher than the average pace angle for large theropods in the Peruvian site. This slight difference may be linked to the fact that the large theropods of the Chacarilla site were, on average, slightly smaller animals (hip 20% shorter) and were walking faster (4–7 km/h; Table 1).

Fig. 4.

Querulpa Chico tracksite, Peru. A. Panoramic photograph of the Querulpa Chico tracksite. B. Schematic map of the trackway directions and their relative positions. C. Distribution of the trackways in the main Querulpa Chico trackbed. A–K refer to particular trackways, and the associated numbers to the individual prints in the trackways.

f04_73.jpg

Fig. 5.

Photographs of Early Cretaceous theropod footprints from the Querulpa Chico tracksite, Peru. A–I refer to the individual trackways in Fig. 4, and the number to the particular print in the trackway. Arrows point to hallux impressions. Scale bars 0.5 m.

f05_73.jpg

Most of the trackways show no preferred orientation, with the exception of trackways 3 and 4, which are parallel and about 0.8 m away from one another. Interestingly, these two trackways exhibit similar pace lengths and footprint morphologies (Table 1; Fig. 6). In both trackways, the impression of digit III constitutes about 50% of the total footprint length. As shown in Fig. 6, both trackways were later crossed perpendicularly by three other trackways (1, 2, 5). Dinoturbation of the track surface is high in some areas (Fig. 6) and sediment consistency of the trackbed appears to have varied over time. For example, trackway 15, which consists of deep footprints, was later crossed by the shallower trackways 16 and 17. The continuity of trackways is also occasionally broken by multiple intersections of trackways (e.g., trackway 6). Some footprints were altered by overprinting, such as the second footprint of trackway 13, which overlapped and modified the edge of the second footprint of trackway 12. Ripple marks are present not only all across the trackbed, but also inside some of the footprints. This indicates that moving water was present during and/or after the incursions of the trackmakers. This observation, together with the presence of displacement rims, suggests that the trackbed was the actual layer on which dinosaurs walked or a layer located right beneath it.

Fig. 6.

Early Cretaceous Chacarilla tracksite, Chile. A. Line drawing and photographs of the Chacarilla theropod tracksite, showing orientations and distribution of trackways. B. Schematic map of trackways 3 and 4, crossed perpendicularly by trackways 1, 5 and 2 (unidentified trackway). Scale bars in A 5 m.

f06_73.jpg

Discussion

The relatively high abundance of trackways of large theropods in Querulpa Chico and Chacarilla suggests that these dinosaurs had overlapping home ranges in the surrounding areas of each site. The morphological differences among footprints and trackways indicate that the tracks cannot be attributed to just one individual repeatedly visiting the site. Although uncertainties remain concerning the time interval over which the trackways were recorded, our study pinpoints the likelihood that distinct large carnivores frequently visited the studied areas. The inferred frequency seems unlikely for single hunters with exclusive territorial behaviour. It is, however, difficult to relate observed trackways to grouping behaviour. Indeed, the trackways investigated here do not display typical patterns of gregariousness such as those observed for herds of herbivorous dinosaurs: parallel trackways, approximately constant distances between trackways, same direction of movements (e.g., Ostrom 1972; Lockley et al. 2002). Instead, the orientation of the large theropod trackways appears mostly random, suggesting limited interactions between the trackmakers. However, strong relationships between trackways have been observed in one instance, i.e., between trackways 3 and 4 of the Chacarilla III locality (Fig. 6). The geometry of these two trackways supports pairing of two equally large theropods. Overall, our observations indicate that trackmakers were either solitary hunters with no exclusive territoriality or disorganized groups of gregarious individuals attached to one territory. Supporting evidence for the second hypothesis comes from recent skeletal and footprint studies in Argentina (Porfiri et al. 2007), North America (Varriccio et al. 2008; Currie and Eberth 2010), and Africa (Lingham-Soliar et al. 2003).

Fluctuating water levels in the tidal basin environment of the Querulpa Chico tracksite and inundation events in the floodplain environment of the Chacarilla tracksite likely facilitated the preservation of the footprints, and probably provided a preferential habitat for these animals. Palaeoclimatic studies indicate that southern Peru and northern Chile experienced arid to semiarid conditions at least since the Late Jurassic (Hartley et al. 2005) and that a wet-summer climatic belt was limited to areas further north (Philippe et al. 2003). It is likely that the presence of water in these dry areas would have attracted the fauna. This way, climatic and perhaps geographical constraints may have favoured interactions between non-gregarious large theropods. Although many of the other tracksites displaying large theropod footprints were recorded in similar depositional environments worldwide, none shows a high density of large theropod trackways (e.g., Alonso and Marquillas 1986; Calvo 1991; Leonardi and Spezzamonte 1994; Lockley and Hunt 1994; Thulborn 2001; Moreno and Pino 2002; Moreno and Benton 2005; Mossman et al. 2003; Mateus and Milàn 2010). Interestingly, climatic conditions corresponding to these other tracksites range from subtropical to temperate, hence not as arid as the conditions at Querulpa Chico and Chacarilla. This comparison further suggests a possible link between climate and the observed concentration of theropods.

Large (>0.3 m long) theropod dinosaur footprints are known from several Late Jurassic—Cretaceous localities in South America, including Argentina (e.g., Alonso and Marquillas 1986; Calvo 1991; Calvo and Mazzetta 2004), Brazil (e.g., Leonardi and Spezzamonte 1994; Leonardi and Santos 2004), Chile (Moreno et al. 2004; Rubilar-Rogers et al. 2008), and recently in Bolivia (Apesteguía and Gallina 2011) (see also reviews by Leonardi 1994 and Weishampel et al. 2004). The Peruvian Querulpa Chico trackways now expand that list. Moreover, our observations from the Querulpa Chico and Chacarilla tracksites confirms a previous report by Moreno et al. (2004) from a tracksite located near Calama 270 km south of Chacarilla that large theropods were living on the western border of the Gondwana supercontinent during the Late Jurassic—Early Cretaceous period. The Querulpa Chico site, therefore, expands the geographic distribution of large theropods almost 800 km to the north. In the absence of bone remains in the fossil record, the Querulpa Chico, Chacarilla and Calama tracksites are the sole indication for the presence in western Gondwana of large theropod dinosaurs.

Large carnivorous dinosaurs in South America with sizes comparable to those of the Peruvian and Chilean trackmakers, as estimated from the footprint length (hip height up to 3 m), pertain to spinosaurids and carcharodontosaurids, for which bone remains are known from the Aptian to the Santonian of Argentina and Brazil (e.g., Coria and Salgado 1995; Kellner and Campos 1996; Coria and Currie 2002, 2006; Candeiro et al. 2004; Novas et al. 2005; Medeiros 2006; Salgado et al. 2009). We should mention that known abelisauroids from the Early Cretaceous have feet smaller than 0.3 m and therefore could not have produced the large footprints recorded in the Querulpa Chico, Chacarilla and Calama tracksites (e.g., Coria et al. 2002, Calvo et al. 2004). Because these three tracksites are slightly older than the bone record of spinosaurids and carcharodontosaurids, they suggest an earlier arrival of such large theropods in western Gondwana. This confirms previous hypotheses of Apesteguía and Gallina (2011) and Rauhut (2004). Therefore, the Querulpa Chico, Chacarilla and Calama tracksites are together with the Berriasian—Barremian tracksites from Northestern Brazil (e.g., Leonardi and Spezzamonte 1994; Leonardi and Santos 2004) the oldest sites in South America evidencing the presence of large theropods. This observation contrasts with findings from Africa, where large theropods were already present during the Middle and Late Jurassic (e.g., Lingham-Soliar et al. 2003; Belvedere et al. 2010, Wagensommer et al. 2010).

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Antonio “Tuco” Díaz (SERNAGEOMIN), David Hone (Institute of Vertebrate Palaeontology and Paleoanthropology, Beijing, China), Oswaldo Victor Martinez Cancapa (Querulpa, Peru), David Rubilar-Rogers (SGOPV), Victor Ruiz Cárcamo (Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile), Pablo de la Vera (Museo de la Universidad de San Augustin, Arequipa, Peru) and the residents of Querulpa and the Colca Valley for their support during fieldwork. Careful reviews by Anthony Martin (Emory University, Atlanta, USA), an anonymous reviewer, and comments from Alexandre Corgne (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse, France) helped improve the manuscript. Research and fieldwork were supported by the Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería (SERNAGEOMIN, Chile), The Jurassic Foundation (Canada), and the Alumni Foundation of the University of Bristol (UK).

References

1.

R.M. Alexander 1976. Estimates of speed of dinosaurs. Nature 261: 129–130. Google Scholar

2.

J.R.L. Allen 1997. Subfossil mammalian tracks (Flandrian) in the Severn Estuary, SW Britain: mechanics of formation, preservation and distribution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 352: 381–518. Google Scholar

3.

R.N. Alonso and R.A. Marquillas 1986. New localities with dinosaur footprints and first finding of bird footprints from the Yacoraite Formation (Maastrichtian), North Argentina. Abstracts of the 4th Argentinian Congress of Paleontology and Biostratigraphy , 33–41. Mendoza. Google Scholar

4.

S. Apesteguía and P. Gallina 2011. Tunasniyoj, a dinosaur tracksite from the Jurassic—Cretaceous boundary of Bolivia. Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences 83: 261–277. Google Scholar

5.

J. Ardill , S. Flint , G. Chong , and H. Wilke 1998. Sequence stratigraphy of the Mesozoic Domeyko Basin, northern Chile. Journal of the Geological Society of London 155: 71–88. Google Scholar

6.

J.L. Barco , J.I. Canudo , and J.I. Ruiz-Omeñaca 2006. New data on Therangospodus oncalensis from the Berriasian Fuentesalvo tracksite (Villar del Río, Soria, Spain): an example of gregarious behaviour in theropod dinosaurs. Ichnos 13: 237–248. Google Scholar

7.

M. Belvedere , P. Mietto , and S. Ishigaki 2010. A Late Jurassic diverse ichnocoenosis from the siliciclastic Iouaridene Formation (Central High Atlas, Morocco). Geological Quarterly 54: 367–380. Google Scholar

8.

V. Benavides 1962. Pre-tertiary stratigraphy of the Arequipa region. Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica del Perú 75: 5–63. Google Scholar

9.

R.T. Bird 1985. Bones for Barnum Brown: Adventures of a Dinosaur Hunter. 225 pp. Texas Christian University Press, Fort Worth. Google Scholar

10.

N. Blanco , A.J. Tomlinson , K. Moreno , and D. Rubilar 2000. Stratigraphic importance of the dinosaur ichnites from the Chacarilla Formaiton (Jurassic—Early Cretaceous), Tarapacá region, Chile. Abstracts of the IX Geological Chilean Congress , 441–445. Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería, Sede Puerto Varas. Google Scholar

11.

T. Bogdanic 1990. Cretaceous and Early Tertiary continental sedimentation in a context of subduction-related magmatism in the Chilean Precordillera (21°–23°S). Berliner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen A 123: 117. Google Scholar

12.

M. Boutakiout , M. Hadri , J. Nouri , I. Díaz-Martínez , and F. Pérez-Lorente 2009. Gigantic theropod footprints from Upper Jurassic trackways (Iouaridène syncline, Marocco). Revista Española de Paleontología 24: 31–16. Google Scholar

13.

J.O. Calvo 1991. Dinosaur footprints from the Río Limay Formation (Albian—Cenomanian), Picún Leufú, Neuquén Province, Argentina (Ornithischia—Saurischia: Sauropoda—Theropoda). Ameghiniana 28: 241–258. Google Scholar

14.

J.O. Calvo and R. Coria 1998. New specimen of Giganotosaurus carolinii (Coria & Salgado, 1995), supports it as the largest theropod ever found. Gaia 15: 117–122. Google Scholar

15.

J.O. Calvo and G.V. Mazzetta 2004. New findings of dinosaur tracks at the Río Limay Formation (Albian—Cenomanian), Picún Leufú, Neuquén, Argentina. Ameghiniana 41: 545–554. Google Scholar

16.

J.O. Calvo , D. Rubilar , and K. Moreno 2004. A new Abelisauridae (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from northwest Patagonia. Ameghiniana 41: 555–563. Google Scholar

17.

C.R.A. Candeiro , C.T. Abranches , E.A. Abrantes , L.S. Avilla , V.C. Martins , A.L. Moreira , S.R. Torres , and L.P. Bergqvist 2004. Dinosaurs remains from western São Paulo state, Brazil (Bauru Basin, Adamantina Formation, Upper Cretaceous). Journal of South American Earth Sciences 18: 1–10. Google Scholar

18.

B. Coira , J. Davidson , C. Mpodozis and V. Ramos 1982. Tectonic and magmatic evolution of the Andes of Northern Argentina and Chile. Earth Science Reviews 18: 303–332. Google Scholar

19.

P. Colinvaux 1978. Why Big Fierce Animals are Rare: an Ecologist's Perspective. 256 pp. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Google Scholar

20.

R.A. Coria and P.J. Currie 2002. The braincase of Giganotosaurus carolinii (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the upper cretaceous of Argentina. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 22: 802–811. Google Scholar

21.

R.A. Coria and P.J. Currie 2006. A new carcharodontosaurid (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Upper Cretaceous of Argentina. Geodiversitas 28: 71–118. Google Scholar

22.

R.A. Coria and L. Salgado 1995. A new giant carnivorous dinosaur from the Cretaceous of Patagonia. Nature 377: 224–226. Google Scholar

23.

R.A. Coria , L.M. Chiappe , and L. Dingus 2002. A new close relative of Carnotaurus sastrei Bonaparte 1985 (Theropoda: Abelisauridae) from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 22: 460–465. Google Scholar

24.

P.J. Currie 1998. Possible evidence of gregarious behaviour in tyrannosaurids. Gaia 15: 271–277. Google Scholar

25.

P.J. Currie and D.A. Eberth 2010. On gregarious behaviour in Albertosaurus. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 47: 1277–1289. Google Scholar

26.

J.J. Day , P. Upchurch , D.B. Norman , A.S. Gale , and H.P. Powell 2002. Sauropod trackways, evolution and behaviour. Science 296: 1659. Google Scholar

27.

K.J. Eppinger and U. Rosenfeld 1996. Western margin and provenance of sediments of the Neuquén Basin (Argentina) in the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous. Tectonophysics 259: 229–244. Google Scholar

28.

J.O. Farlow 1993. On the rareness of big, fierce animals: speculations about body sizes, population densities, and geographic ranges of predatory mammals and large carnivorous dinosaurs. American Journal of Science 293-A:167–199. Google Scholar

29.

J.O. Farlow and R.E. Chapman 1997. The scientific study of dinosaur footprints. In : J.O. Farlow and M.K. Brett-Surman (eds.), The Complete Dinosaur , 519–553. Indiana University Press, Bloomington. Google Scholar

30.

J.O. Farlow , J.G. Pittman , and M.J. Hawthorne 1989. Brontopodus birdi, Lower Cretaceous sauropod footprints from the U. S. gulf coastal plain. In : D.D. Gillette and M.G. Lockley (eds.), Dinosaur Tracks and Traces , 371–394. Cambridge University Press, New York. Google Scholar

31.

C. Galli and R. Dingman 1962. The Pica-Alca-Matilla-Chacarilla quadrangle. Geological map of Chile. Scale 1:50,000. 125 pp. Instituto de Investigaciones Geológicas, Santiago. Google Scholar

32.

S.M. Gatesy 2003. Direct and indirect track features: what sediment did a dinosaur touch? Ichnos 10: 91–98. Google Scholar

33.

N.J. Gotelli 2008. A Primer of Ecology. 4th Edition. 290 pp. Sinauer Associates Press, Sunderland. Google Scholar

34.

J.J. Guizado 1968. Geology of the Aplao quadrangle. 50 pp. Ministerio de Obras Publicas, Servicio de Geología y Minería, Lima, Peru. Google Scholar

35.

K. Hammerschmidt , R. Döbel , and H. Friedrichsen 1992. Implication of 40Ar/39Ar dating of Early Tertiary volcanic rocks from the north-Chilean Precordillera. Tectonophysics 202: 55–81. Google Scholar

36.

A.J. Hartley , G. Chong , J. Houston , and A.E. Mather 2005. 150 million years of climatic stability: evidence from the Atacama Desert, northern Chile. Journal of the Geological Society of London 162: 421–424. Google Scholar

37.

J. Jacay , L. Bulot , K. Moreno , and T. Sempere 2006. Sedimentological aspects during the Jurassic—Cretaceous (Yura Group) in the area of the Majes Valley (Arequipa). Extended abstracts of the XIII Peruvian Congress of Geology , 543–546. Lima. Google Scholar

38.

S.J. Jackson , M.A. Whyte , and M. Romano 2010. Range of experimental dinosaur (Hypsilophodon foxii) footprints due to variation in sand consistency: How wet was the track? Ichnos 17: 197–214. Google Scholar

39.

W. Jenks 1948. Geology of the Arequipa region, 1/200.000 scale. Boletín del Instituto Geológico del Perú 9: 1–104. Google Scholar

40.

A.W.A. Kellner and D.D.A. Campos 1996. First Early Cretaceous theropod dinosaur from Brazil with comments on Spinosauridae. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen 199: 151–166. Google Scholar

41.

G. Leonardi 1994. Annotated Atlas of South American Tetrapod Footprints (Devonian to Holocene) with Appendix on Mexico and Central America. 248 pp. Companhia de Pesquisa de Recursos Minerais, Rio de Janeiro. Google Scholar

42.

G. Leonardi and M. Spezzamonte 1994. New tracksites (Dinosauria: Theropoda and Ornithopoda) from the Lower Cretaceous of the Ceará, Brazil. Studi Trentini di Scienze Naturali-Acta Geologica 69: 61–70. Google Scholar

43.

G. Leonardi and M.F.C.F. Santos 2004. New dinosaur tracksites from the Sousa Lower Cretaceous basin (Paraíba, Brazil). Studi Trentini di Scienze Naturali—Acta Geologica 81: 5–21. Google Scholar

44.

Li R ., M.G. Lockley , P.J. Makovicky , M. Matsukawa , M.A. Norell , J.D. Harris , and M. Liu 2007. Behavioural and faunal implications of Early Cretaceous deinonychosaur trackways from China. Naturwissenschaften 95: 185–191. Google Scholar

45.

T. Lingham-Soliar , T. Broderick , and A. Ait Kaci Ahmed 2003. Closely associated theropod trackways from the Jurassic of Zimbabwe. Naturwissenschaften 90: 572–576. Google Scholar

46.

M.G. Lockley 1998. The vertebrate track record. Nature 396: 429–432. Google Scholar

47.

M.G. Lockley and A.P. Hunt 1994. A track of the giant theropod dinosaur Tyrannosaurus from close to the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary, northern New Mexico. Ichnos 3: 213–218. Google Scholar

48.

M.G. Lockley and A.P. Hunt 1995. Dinosaur Tracks and Other Fossil Footprints of the Western United States. 338 pp. Columbia University Press, New York. Google Scholar

49.

M.G. Lockley and M. Matsukawa 1999. Some observations on trackway evidence for gregarious behaviour among small bipedal dinosaurs. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 150: 25–31. Google Scholar

50.

M.G. Lockley , C.A. Meyer , and V.F. Santos 1994. Trackway evidence for a herd of juvenile sauropods from the Late Jurassic of Portugal. Gaia 10: 43–48. Google Scholar

51.

M.G. Lockley , A.S. Schulp , C.A. Meyer , G. Leonardi , and D. Kerumba 2002. Titanosaurid trackways from the Upper Cretaceous of Bolivia: evidence for large manus, wide-gauge locomotion and gregarious behaviour. Cretaceous Research 23: 383–400. Google Scholar

52.

O. Mateus and J. Milàn 2010. A diverse Upper Jurassic dinosaur ichnofauna from central-west Portugal. Lethaia 43: 245–257. Google Scholar

53.

M.A. Medeiros 2006. Large theropod teeth from the Eocenomanian of Northeastern Brazil and the occurrence of Spinosauridae. Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia 9: 333–338. Google Scholar

54.

K. Moreno and M. Pino 2002. Dinosaur footprints in the Banos del Flaco Formation (Tithonian—Upper Jurassic), VI Region, Chile: paleoethology and paleoenvironment. Revista Geológica de Chile 29: 151–165. Google Scholar

55.

K. Moreno and M.J. Benton 2005. Occurrence of sauropod dinosaur tracks in the Upper Jurassic of Chile (redescription of Iguanodonichnus frenki). Journal of South American Earth Sciences 20: 253–257. Google Scholar

56.

K. Moreno , N. Blanco , and A. Tomlinson 2004. New dinosaur footprints from the Upper Jurassic of northern Chile. Ameghiniana 41: 535–544. Google Scholar

57.

D.J. Mossman , R. Brüning , and H.P. Powell 2003. Anatomy of a Jurassic theropod trackway from Ardley, Oxfordshire, U.K. Ichnos 10: 195–207. Google Scholar

58.

C. Mpodozis and R. Allmendinger 1992. Large scale Cretaceous extension in northern Chile (Puquios-Sierra de Fraga, 27° S): implications for the tectonic evolution of the Andes. Revista Geológica de Chile 19: 167–198. Google Scholar

59.

F.E. Novas , S. de Valais , P. Vickers-Rich , and T. Rich 2005. A large Cretaceous theropod from Patagonia, Argentina, and the evolution of carcharodontosaurids. Naturwissenschaften 92: 226–230. Google Scholar

60.

J.H. Ostrom 1972. Were some dinosaurs gregarious? Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 11: 287–301. Google Scholar

61.

M. Philippe , G. Cuny , E. Jaillard , G. Barale , B. Gomez , M. Ouaja , F. Thévenard , M. Thiébaut , and P. Von Sengbush 2003. The paleoxylological record of Metapodocarpoxylon libanoticum (Edwards) Dupéron-Laudoueneix et Pons and the Gondwana Late Jurassic—Early Cretaceous Continental biogeography. Journal of Biogeography 30: 389–400. Google Scholar

62.

J.D. Porfiri , D. dos Santos , and J.O. Calvo 2007. New information on Megaraptor namunhuaiquii (Theropoda: Tetanurae), Patagonia: considerations on paleoecological aspects. Arquivos do Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro 65: 545–550. Google Scholar

63.

V. Ramos and S.M. Kay 1991. Triassic rifting and associated basalt in the Cuyo Basin, central Argentina. In : R.S. Harmond and C.W. Rapela (eds.), Andean Magmatism and its Tectonic Setting , 79–91. Geological Society of America, Boulder. Google Scholar

64.

O.W.M. Rauhut 2004. Provenance and anatomy of Genyodectes serus, a large-toothed ceratosaur (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from Patagonia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 24: 894–902. Google Scholar

65.

R. Rodriguez , E. Cuéllar , and T. Sempere 2005. Stratigraphy of the northeastern edge of the Mesozoic Arequipa Basin, southern Perú. Extended Abstracts 6th International Symposium on Andean Geodynamics , 612–615. Barcelona. Google Scholar

66.

J.V.I. Rogers 2002. Theropod dinosaur trackways in the Lower Cretaceous (Albian) Glen Rose Formation, Kinney County, Texas. Texas Journal of Science 54: 133–142. Google Scholar

67.

R.W.R. Rutland 1971. Andean orogeny and sea-floor spreading. Nature 233: 252–255. Google Scholar

68.

D. Rubilar-Rogers , K. Moreno , N. Blanco , and J. Calvo 2008. Theropod dinosaur trackway from the Lower Cretaceous of the Chacarilla Formation, Chile. Revista Geológica de Chile 35: 175–184. Google Scholar

69.

G.D. Ruxton and D.C. Houston 2003. Could Tyrannosaurus rex have been a scavenger rather than a predator? An energetics approach. Proceedings of Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 270: 1471–2954. Google Scholar

70.

L. Salgado , J.I. Canudo , A.C. Garrido , J.I. Ruiz-Omeñaca , R.A. García , M.S. de la Fuente , J.L. Barco , and R. Bollati 2009. Upper Cretaceous vertebrates from El Anfiteatro area, Rio Negro, Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 30: 767–784. Google Scholar

71.

T. Sempere , J. Jacay , A. Pino , H. Bertrand , V. Carlotto , M. Fornari , R. García , M. Jiménez , A. Marzoli , C.A. Meyer , S. Rosas , and P. Soler 2004. Lithospheric stretching during the Late Paleozoic—Middle Cretaceous interval in Peru and Bolivia. In : J. Jacay and T. Sempere (eds.), Nuevas contribuciones del IRD y sus contrapartes al conocimiento geológico del sur del Perú , Vol. 5, 45–79. Sociedad Geológica del Perú, Publicación Especial, Lima. Google Scholar

72.

P.C. Sereno , D.B. Dutheil , M. Iarochene , H.C.E. Larsson , G. Lyon , P.M. Magwene , C.A. Sidor , D.J. Varricchio , and J.A. Wilson 1996. Predatory dinosaurs from the Sahara and Late Cretaceous faunal differentiation. Science 272: 986–991. Google Scholar

73.

E. Stromer 1915. Results of the research travel of Prof. E. Stromers in West Egypt. II. Vertebrate remains from the Bahariye period (lower Cenomanian). 3. The original theropod Spinosaurus aegyptiacus nov. gen., nov. spec. Abhandlungen der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse 28: 1–28. Google Scholar

74.

E. Stromer 1931. Vertebrate remains from the Bahariye period (lower Cenomanian). 10. A skeleton of Carcharodontosaurus nov. gen. Abhandlungen der Koniglich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse 9: 1–23. Google Scholar

75.

E. Stromer 1934. Results of the research travel of Prof. E. Stromers in West Egypt. II. Vertebrate remains from the Bahariye period (lower Cenomanian). 13. Dinosauria. Abhandlungen der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse 22:1–79. Google Scholar

76.

R.A. Thulborn 1989. The gaits of dinosaurs. In : D.D. Gillette and M.G. Lockley (eds.), Dinosaur Tracks and Traces , 39–50. Cambridge University Press, New York. Google Scholar

77.

T. Thulborn 1990. Dinosaur Tracks. 409 pp. Chapman and Hall, London. Google Scholar

78.

R.A. Thulborn 2001. History and nomenclature of the theropod dinosaur tracks Bueckeburgichnus and Megalosauripus. Ichnos 8: 207–222. Google Scholar

79.

R.A. Thulborn and M. Wade 1984. Dinosaur trackways in the Winton Formation (Mid-Cretaceous) of Queensland. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 21: 413–517. Google Scholar

80.

A.J. Tomlinson , M.W. Martin , N. Blanco , and C. Pérez de Arce 2001. U-Pb and K-Ar geochronology from the Cerro Empexa Formation, 1 st and 2nd Regions, Precordillera, northern Chile. Extended Abstracts of the III South American Symposium on Isotope Geology, 632–635. Sociedad Geológica de Chile, Santiago. Google Scholar

81.

D.J. Varricchio , P.C. Sereno , X.-J. Zhao , T. Lin , J.A. Wilson , and G.H. Lyon 2008. Mud-trapped herd captures evidence of distinctive dinosaur sociality. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 53: 567–578. Google Scholar

82.

A. Wagensommer , M. Latiano , and U. Nicosia 2010. First Report of Dinosaur Footprints from Madagascar: Two Tracksites from the Middle Jurassic Bemaraha Formation. Ichnos: An International Journal for Plant and Animal Traces 17: 127–136. Google Scholar

83.

D.B. Weishampel , P.M. Barrett , R. Coria , J. Le Loeuff , X. Xing , Z. Xijin , A. Sahni , E.M.P. Gomani , and C.R. Noto 2004. Dinosaur distribution. In : D.B. Weishampel , P. Dodson , and H. Osmolska (eds.), The Dinosauria , 517–606. University of California Press, Berkeley. Google Scholar

84.

P.D. White , D.E. Fastovsky , and P.M. Sheehan 1998. Taphonomy and suggested structure of the dinosaurian assemblage of the Hell Creek Formation (Maastrichtian), eastern Montana and western North Dakota. Palaios 13: 41–51. Google Scholar

85.

L.E. Zanno and P.J. Makovicky 2011. Herbivorous ecomorphology and specialization patterns in theropod dinosaur evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 232–237. Google Scholar
Karen Moreno, Silvina de Valais, Nicolás Blanco, Andrew J. Tomlinson, Javier Jacay, and Jorge O. Calvo "Large Theropod Dinosaur Footprint Associations in Western Gondwana: Behavioural and Palaeogeographic Implications," Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 57(1), 73-83, (1 March 2012). https://doi.org/10.4202/app.2010.0119
Received: 21 November 2011; Accepted: 4 April 2011; Published: 1 March 2012
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top