Translator Disclaimer
29 February 2016 Diversity of Cingulate Xenarthrans in the Middle—Late Eocene of Northwestern Argentina
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The study of Paleogene mammals of intermediate and low latitudes has increased in the last decades and has been clearly demonstrated their importance in the comprehension of the evolution and faunistic changes outside Patagonia. The study of these faunas permits establishing new comparisons among contemporaneous faunistic associations, completing the distributional patterns, and evaluating evolutionary changes in the lineages in relation to climatic conditions prevailing in each of the different regions. In this work we study the diversity of Dasypodidae recovered from the Geste Formation (Northwestern Argentina). Bearing levels of Geste Formation were referred alternatively to a Barrancan subage of Casamayoran SALMA (middle Eocene, Lutetian—Bartonian) or a Mustersan SALMA (middle—late Eocene, Bartonian— Priabonian) on faunistic comparations with their equivalent in Patagonia, although absolute isotopic data indicates ca. 37–35 Ma (late Eocene, Priabonian). We described the following taxa of Dasypodidae: (i) Dasypodinae Astegotheriini: cf. Astegotherium sp., ?Prostegotherium sp., Parastegosimpsonia cf. P. peruana; (ii) Dasypodinae indet.; (iii) Euphractinae Euphractini: Parutaetus punaensis sp. nov.; (iv) Dasypodidae incertae sedis: Pucatherium parvum, Punatherium catamarcensis gen. et sp. nov. In comparison with other beds bearing Eocene cingulate faunas from Northwestern Argentina, Geste Formation presents the greatest diversity of dasypodids. This association is consistent with a late Eocene age and shows a taxonomic and biogeographic relevant features given by a unique specific composition: (i) it differs from that known for contemporaneous faunas from Southern latitudes and younger associations from more tropical areas; (ii) it includes genera with close affinities to those distant areas; (iii) it presents unique taxa typical from Eocene units exposed at Northwestern Argentina. This highlights the evolutionary and biogeographic meaning of the cingulate of the Geste Formation and supports the idea that the faunistic regionalization probably obeyed to latitudinal than to temporal factors.

Introduction

Even though the most ancient cingulates come from the early Eocene outcrops of Itaboraí (Brazil, Itaboraian SALMA) (Oliveira and Berqvist 1998; Berqvist et al. 2004; Woodburne et al. 2014), the group is well-known from Riochican (early Eocene; Simpson 1948; Gelfo et al. 2010; Goin et al. in press) deposits exposed in the Southern Cone of South America (Patagonia, Argentina). Since then, the group was persistently recorded in almost all the Cenozoic South American faunistic associations (Carlini et al. 2010; Ciancio et al. 2013a).

In recent decades, the interest in the study of Paleogene mammals of intermediate and low latitudes has increased continuously because the significance in the comprehension of the evolution and faunistic changes outside Patagonia, has been clearly demonstrated (Carlini et al. 1997; Shockey et al. 2004; Reguero et al. 2008; García-López and Powell 2011; Antoine et al. 2012; Ciancio et al. 2013b; García-López and Babot 2015). The study of these faunas permits establishing new comparisons among contemporaneous faunistic associations, completing the distributional patterns, and evaluating evolutionary changes in the lineages in relation to the climatic conditions prevailing in each of the different regions (Carlini et al. 1997, 2006; Ciancio et al. 2013a).

Fig. 1.

A, B. Location of the studied area in South America. C. Map of Northwestern Argentina showing the main middle and middle—late Eocene fossil-bearing localities: 1, Antofagasta de la Sierra; 2, Quebrada El Paso; 3, Luracatao valley; 4, Cerro Tin Tin; 5, El Aguilar; 6, Estancia Pampa Grande—El Simbolar; 7, Juramento River.

f01_575.jpg

In Northwestern Argentina the fossil mammal-bearing Paleogene units are widely distributed, mainly in Salta, Jujuy, and Catamarca provinces. The geologic units most extensively prospected and richest in terms of the fossil content are those formed during the Eocene (56.0–33.6 Ma, Ypresian—Priabonian; Cohen et al. 2013) (Powell et al. 2011 and references therein).

Up to now, the Paleogene xenarthran record in this region is restricted to the following Eocene geologic units: (i) Geste Formation exposed at Antofagasta de la Sierra (Catamarca Province) and Quebrada El Paso, near Pozuelos salt flat (Salta Province); (ii) Quebrada de los Colorados Formation exposed at Luracatao valley and Cerro Tin Tin (Salta Province); (iii) Casa Grande Formation exposed at Sierra Aguilar (Jujuy Province); and (iv) Lumbrera Formation exposed at Pampa Grande and Juramento River (Salta Province) (Fig. 1).

Among these units, one of the most interesting is the Geste Formation, mainly by the diversity and abundance of small to medium-size fossil vertebrate, especially mammals. The age of the fossil-bearing levels was recently isotopically dated and assigned to the late Eocene, although also has been proposed a middle Eocene age based on biochronological data (see Discussion). Initially the faunal associations were partially studied, being the most significant works those referred to the entire vertebrate assemblage (López 1997), and other restricted to particular groups, such as metatherians (Goin et al. 1998) and notoungulates (Bond and López 1995; López and Bond 1995; Reguero et al. 2008). In the last years, new paleontological prospections at the Geste Formation resulted in the discovery of new notoungulates (García-López and Babot 2015) and metatherians (Babot and García-López 2014). However, to date, no specific and detailed work on the diversity of xenarthrans were performed in this region.

In the Geste Formation, xenarthrans include only dasypodids, which are mainly represented by isolated osteoderms, although a petrosal assigned to Dasypodinae was recently described (Babot et al. 2012). Most taxa previously recognized were assigned to Astegotheriini (Dasypodinae); among them, cf. Astegotherium sp. and Prostegotherium sp. (Alonso et al. 1988), a new species assigned doubtfully to Astegotheriini (not formally described; Vizcaíno 1994), Astegotheriini indet. (Lopez 1997), and Prostegotherium notostylopianum, Prostegotherium sp., and Astegotherium sp. (Powell et al. 2011; Herrera 2013). Powell et al. (2011) mentioned the presence of cf. Utaetus (Euphractinae), and recently Herrera et al. (2012) described Pucatherium parvum, an indeterminate Dasypodidae.

In this work we study the diversity of Dasypodidae recovered from the Geste Formation levels exposed in Antofagasta de la Sierra (Catamarca Province) and Quebrada El Paso (vicinities of Pozuelos salt flat, Salta Province) (Fig. 1). In addition, we compare this association with that known for other South American Paleogene faunas and discuss its relevance in the resolution of the age of the Geste Formation. We also provide additional geological data of this unit, including a detailed stratigraphic profile of the fossil vertebrate-bearing horizons exposed at Antofagasta de la Sierra, and the geographical distribution of the formation in Catamarca and Salta Provinces.

Institutional abbreviations.—MHAS, Museo del Hombre de Antofagasta de la Sierra, Antofagasta de la Sierra, Catamarca, Argentina; MLP, Museo de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo de La Plata, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina; PVL, Colección de Paleontología de Vertebrados Lillo, Tucumán, Argentina.

Other abbreviations.—SALMA, South American Land Mam mal Age.

Geological setting

Turner (1960) recognized the Pastos Grandes Group as a lithostratigraphic unit including Geste, Pozuelos, and Sijes formations. The Geste Formation is broadly distributed in different basins of the NW Argentina (Fig. 2) as the Salar de Pastos Grandes (Blasco et al. 1996; DeCelles et al. 2007), Salar de Arizaro (Zappettini and Blasco 2001; Jordan and Mpodozis 2006), Salar de Antofalla (Kraemer et al. 1999; Carrapa et al. 2005; Seggiaro 2007), Salar del Hombre Muerto (Hongn and Seggiaro 2001) and in the surrounding areas of Antofagasta de la Sierra (Jordan and Alonso 1987). The distribution of this formation is mainly along NS areas close to the Eastern margin of the Puna Plateau, coinciding with the predominant Andean direction (e.g., Cumbres del Macón and Cordones del Gallego and Pozuelos ranges, Salta; Carachipampa and Incahuasi valleys and Sierra de Filo Colorado, Catamarca).

The Geste Formation type section of Pastos Grandes basin (Turner 1961, 1964) comprises mainly coarsening upward sandstone, conglomerate and subordinate shale deposited on a fluvial and alluvial fan environment. This unit covers unconformable different Paleozoic basements along the spatially separated basins where it outcrops: Copalayo or Coquena Formation in Pastos Grandes basin (Upper Ordovician; Alonso 1992; Blasco and Zappettini 1996), Falda Ciénaga Formation in Antofagasta de la Sierra and Cordón del Gallego (Ordovician; Aceñolaza et al. 1976; Hongn and Seggiaro 2001), Coquena Formation in Sierra de Calalaste (Upper Ordovician; Blasco and Zappettini 1996), and Patquía de la Cuesta Formation (Permian; Seggiaro 2007) in surrounding areas of the Antofalla volcano.

In the Pastos Grandes basin, in outcrops located on the eastern flank of the Sierra de Copalayo (Salta), the Geste Formation was divided by Alonso (1992) in three members: lower, middle, and upper. The fossil-bearing level was restricted to the middle member which differed from the others by its typical reddish colour and the lithology (mainly composed by sandstone and mudstone, with low participation of conglomerate sets). This author also proposed a stratigraphic correlation between the Geste Formation fossiliferous level exposed at Sierra de Copalayo and those of Antofagasta de la Sierra (Catamarca), based on the geological (lithology and fossil content) and physical (colour) similarity. DeCelles et al. (2007) and Carrapa and DeCelles (2008) used the same division, and proposed radiometric Paleogene depositional ages for the Geste Formation in the Pastos Grandes basin.

In Antofagasta de la Sierra the fossil-bearing level (Fig. 1, 2) is outcropping in the northern and southeastern areas of the town (Alonso 1992; Goin et al. 1998). The base of this member is not exposed and the top is unconformable covered by Pliocene ignimbrite from the Cerro Galán volcanic complex. Fine to medium micaceous reddish sandstone are intercalated with coarse conglomerate-sandstone matrix and subordinate mudstone. The succession thickness is approximately 600 m and has a coarsening upward trend (Fig. 3). The sandstone beds have primary structures developed as low-angle trough cross-stratification at the base, the conglomerates are present in lenticular beds with planar cross-bedding, and the mudstone have a diffuse interne bedding structure. Sedimentological features indicate that this member was deposited in a braided fluvial environment with minor floodplains that is geologically comparable with the middle member exposed at the the Salar de Pastos Grandes (Alonso 1992). Based on the high content of psamitic material, and the high degree of fragmentation and disarticulation of the fossil material we infer a high-energy fluvial environment.

Fig. 2.

Distribution of Geste Formation in different basins of the Northwestern Argentina. The distribution of this formation is mainly along N-S areas close to the Eastern margin of the Puna Plateau, coinciding with the predominant Andean direction. 1, Salar de Atacama; 2, Salar del Rincón; 3, Salar de Arizaro; 4, Salar de Pocitos; 5, Salar del Hombre Muerto; 6, Salar de Antofalla; SC, San Antonio de los Cobres; PG, Santa Rosa de los Pastos Grandes; P, La Poma; An, Angasto; Af, Antofagasta de la Sierra.

f02_575.jpg

Material and methods

The materials here studied include isolated osteoderms which were recovered at Antofagasta de la Sierra (Catamarca Province, Argentina; 26°03′43″ S, 67°24′27″ W) and Quebrada El Paso, near the Salar of Pozuelos (Salta Province; 24°39′16.08″ S, 66°45′4.83″ W). This collection is composed by pieces gathered during paleontological prospections conducted between 1980 and 1993 (MLP) and recent fieldworks carried out since 2007 (MHAS).

The dasypodid osteoderms are elements frequently preserved in the fossil record; since the discovery of the earliest known records of the group, these pieces were consistently collected in almost all the South American fossil mammal faunas. The morphology of the osteoderms has a high diagnostic value for taxonomic determinations (Scillato-Yané 1982; Vizcaíno 1994; Carlini and Scillato-Yané 1996; Fernicola and Vizcaíno 2008; Carlini et al. 2010). However, this value is subject to the comparison of the elements corresponding to homologous regions of the carapace. Therefore, it is necessary to identify the intra and interspecific variability in the morphologic pattern of the osteoderms at the different portions of the carapace. In order to minimize misinterpretations, we examined this variation on the carapace or associated groups of osteoderms of some extinct and extant armadillo taxa.

Fig. 3.

Generalized lithostratigraphic profile of the Geste Formation exposed at Antofagasta de la Sierra, Catamarca, Argentina. Numbers indicate the bedding: strike/dip. Abbreviations: St, siltstone; S, sandstone; C, conglomerate; f, fine; m, medium; c, coarse.

f03_575.jpg

Measurements of these and other specimens were taken using manual calipers. Osteoderms terminology follows Krmpotic et al. (2009), Ciancio et al. (2013a), and Francia and Ciancio (2013).

Systematic paleontology

Order Cingulata Illiger, 1811
Family Dasypodidae Gray, 1821
Subfamily Dasypodinae Gray, 1821
Tribe Astegotheriini Ameghino, 1906
Genus Astegotherium Ameghino, 1902

  • Type species: Astegotherium dichotomus Ameghino, 1902; Patagonia Argentina, middle Eocene.

  • cf. Astegotherium sp.

  • Fig. 4A.

  • Material.—MHAS 067, fixed osteoderm from Quebrada El Paso, near the Pozuelos salt flat, Los Andes Department, Salta Province, Argentina; middle member of the Geste Formation (sensu Alonso 1992); middle—late Eocene.

  • Description.—This small osteoderm is similar in size to those of the living Dasypus hybridus or D. septencinctus. The osteoderm has a smooth surface and a lageniform principal figure with an elevated medial keel. There are an anterior and two anterolateral peripheral figures. The lateral border is smooth and slightly concave. On the posterior edge, there are two small piliferous foramina. Unlike other astegotheriins, Astegotherium have very few (or no) foramina surrounding the central figure. The differences of the osteoderm here described with those of the only species formally described for this genus, Astegotherium dichotomus, are the sulcus delimiting the principal and peripheral figures well defined, the posterior border straight (not bevel-shaped), the relative thickness, and the smaller size of the osteoderm.

  • Measurements.—6.8 mm long, 5.8 mm wide, and 3 mm thick.

  • Remarks.—Astegotherium represents a taxon frequently recorded in Eocene beds of Patagonia. The only species formally described is Astegotherium dichotomus Ameghino, 1902 from the early Casamayoran (Vacan subage of the Casamayoran SALMA, middle Eocene; Ciancio et al. 2013a, 2014), although a probably new species was mentioned from early—middle Eocene levels exposed at Laguna Fría (Tejedor et al. 2009).

  • Fig. 4.

    Dasypodines from the middle member of the Geste Formation, middle—late Eocene, Northwestern Argentina. A. cf. Astegotherium sp., fixed osteoderm, MHAS 067; Quebrada El Paso, near the Pozuelos salt flat, Los Andes Department, Salta Province. B, C.?Prostegotherium sp., movable osteoderms, MHAS 024 (B) and PVL 6567 (C); Antofagasta de la Sierra, Catamarca Province. DF. Parastegosimpsonia cf. P. peruana, fixed osteoderms, PVL 6569 (D) and MLP 88-V-10-19A (E, broken); movable osteoderm, PVL 6409 (F); Antofagasta de la Sierra, Catamarca Province. G. Dasypodinae indet., movable osteoderm, MLP 88-V-10-19; Antofagasta de la Sierra, Catamarca Province. HJ. Movable osteoderms of Stegosimpsonia (H), Dasypodinae indet. (I) and Anadasypus (J). Photographs (A1–G1), line drawings (A2–G2, H–J). H–J, not to scale.

    f04_575.jpg

    Genus Prostegotherium Ameghino, 1902

  • Type species: Prostegotherium notostylopianum Ameghino, 1902; Patagonia Argentina, early—middle Eocene.

  • ?Prostegotherium sp.
    Fig. 4B, C.

  • Material.—MHAS 024 and PVL 6567, two movable osteoderms from Antofagasta de la Sierra, Catamarca Province, Argentina; middle member of the Geste Formation (sensu Alonso 1992); middle—late Eocene.

  • Description.—Medium size osteoderms, probably intermediate to the extant species Dasypus hybrids and Dasypus novemcinctus. The exposed surface is smooth, with numerous small pits. The lateral surface is straight and slightly smooth. The principal figure is lageniform with a wide neck and a conspicuous longitudinal keel occupying the entire central region of the osteoderm. At least five to seven foramina occur at the sulcus that encircles the neck of the lageniform main figure. The presence of a row of foramina in the external surface of the osteoderms forming a semicircle is characteristic of Prostegotherium and Riostegotherium (Astegotheriini), but Riostegotherium lacks figures and has more foramina. Peripheral figures are defined by a shallow sulcus. The lateral figures are markedly smaller than the anterior ones. The piliferous system is represented by two to five small foramina on the posterior margin.

  • Measurements.—10.6–11.3 mm long, 5.2–6.7 mm wide, and 1.9–2.4 mm thick.

  • Remarks.—The characteristics of the osteoderms are a combination of those of the known species of Prostegotherium (see Vizcaíno 1994) and probably they would represent a new species of this genus. The presence of a sharp medial keel, rugose surface and five small piliferous pits are characteristic of P. astrifer; but the size and the presence of 4–5 foramina in the external surface of the osteoderm forming an inverted U (not with triangular shape, as P. astrifer), resembles P. notostylopianum. More and better preserved remains could help a more accurate assignment. Prostegotherium is well represented in early—middle Eocene localities of Patagonia, Argentina (Carlini et al. 2002, 2010; Tejedor et al. 2009; Gelfo et al. 2010; Ciancio et al. 2013a; SOM: Supplementary Online Material available at  http://app.pan.pl/SOM/app61-Ciancio_etal_SOM.pdf). In Northwestern Argentina, this genus was recovered at Casa Grande and Quebrada de los Colorados formations (Herrera and Powell 2009; Herrera et al. 2012; Herrera 2013; see Table 1). The temporal distribution of Prostegotherium provides further evidence to reinforce the interpretation of an Eocene age for Geste Formation (Powell et al. 2011; Herrera 2013).

  • Table 1.

    Comparative chart of cingulates from Eocene age in South America. ECAS, early Casamayoran SALMA (Vacan subage), middle Eocene; LCAS, late Casamayoran SALMA (Barrancan subage), middle Eocene; MUS, Mustersan SALMA, middle—late Eocene; TIN, Tinguirirican SALMA, late Eocene; GF, fauna of Geste Formation; PP, Eocene faunas from the Paleogene of Peru (Santa Rosa and Contamana); ×, presence; ?, doubtful assignation. From Carlini et al. (2010), Ciancio and Carlini (2008), Ciancio et al. (2013a), and Woodburne et al. (2014).

    t01_575.gif

    Genus Parastegosimpsonia Ciancio, Carlini, Campbell, and Scillato-Yané, 2013

  • Type species: Parastegosimpsonia peruana Ciancio, Carlini, Campbell and Scillato-Yané, 2013; Yurúa River, Peru; Paleogene (Eocene?).

  • Parastegosimpsonia cf. P. peruana Ciancio, Carlini, Campbell, and Scillato-Yané, 2013
    Fig. 4D–F.

  • Material.—PVL 6569 and MLP 88-V-10-19A, fixed osteoderms; PVL 6409, movable osteoderm; from Antofagasta de la Sierra, Catamarca Province, Argentina; middle member of the Geste Formation (sensu Alonso 1992); middle—late Eocene.

  • Description.—Small osteoderms similar in size to the extant Dasypus hybridus. The osteoderms are relatively thick, like Stegosimpsonia and Parastegosimpsonia peruana, but thicker than in other Astegotheriini (Ciancio et al. 2013a). The fixed osteoderm is subrectangular. The lateral surfaces are straight and smooth, with few isolated pits. The external surface is smoother than in Parastegosimpsonia peruana and exhibits a principal figure, and two anterior and two anterolateral ones. The principal figure is lageniform and flat (without keel) with a short neck, similar to that observed in Parastegosimpsonia peruana. It is limited from the peripheral figures by an almost imperceptible sulcus housing four large foramina symmetrically arranged on each side of the neck of the principal figure, as in Parastegosimpsonia. The anterolateral figures are less evident; they are bounded by superficial grooves. The lateral margins lack foramina, unlike Stegosimpsonia and Parastegosimpsonia. In PVL 6569 no piliferous foramina are observed, but in MLP 88-V-10-19A, there are three in the posterior margin. The movable osteoderm has a main lageniform figure with a short neck and a medial keel occupying the whole length of the osteoderm. As the fixed osteoderm, it has four foramina in the anterior portion of the sulcus that defines the main figure, and two foramina on the posterolateral surfaces, similar to those present in fixed osteoderms of Parastegosimpsonia peruana. The peripheral figures are represented by two anterolateral figures. The transition area separating the overlapping portion of the osteoderm from the exposed portion is poorly developed and smooth, but exhibits some striations. The piliferous system is poorly developed; it includes two small foramina on the posterior margin.

  • Measurements.—Fixed osteoderm (PVL 6569): 9.7 mm long, 6.2 mm wide, and 2.4 mm thick, approximately 20% larger than those Parastegosimpsonia peruana. Movable osteoderm: 10.3 mm long, 5.0 mm wide, and 1.5 mm thick.

  • Remarks.—Ciancio et al. (2013a) described Parastegosimpsonia peruana, based on a fixed osteoderm from Santa Rosa, Peru. The age of the fossiliferous deposits of the Santa Rosa locality is still controversial, but the cingulates suggest an age between the late Eocene—early Oligocene. We consider the Antofagasta remains as similar to this species but there are some differences in the fixed osteoderm (larger size, absence of a keel on the main figure, absence of foramina on the lateral margin). The scarcity of remains of this species (only one fixed osteoderm constitutes the holotype) difficults to test the morphological variation of the osteoderms, hence we cannot confirm the formal assignation of these osteoderms to the Peruvian Astegotheriini. Additionally, we assign a movable osteoderm to P. peruana, based on the following features: the main figure is lageniform with a short neck and a medial keel occupying the whole length of the osteoderm, and the presence of a pair of large foramina on the lateral margin. New and more complete materials would help us to confirm this preliminary assignation.

  • Subfamily Dasypodinae Gray, 1821
    Dasypodinae gen. et sp. indet.
    Fig. 4G.

  • Material.—MLP 88-V-10-19, posterior portion of a movable osteoderm from Antofagasta de la Sierra, Catamarca Province, Argentina; middle member of the Geste Formation (sensu Alonso 1992); middle—late Eocene.

  • Description.—This broken osteoderm has some peculiar features that indicate that it could represent a new taxon. The osteoderm is larger than those of the others Dasypodinae from Geste levels, and similar in size to the extant species Dasypus kappleri. The main figure is lageniform, with a long neck that widens and reaches the lateral edges on the posterior third of the osteoderm. The morphology of the main figure is an intermediate condition between Stegosimpsonia (Astegotheriini; Fig. 4H) and Anadasypus (Dasypodini; Fig. 4J). In the former, the main figure opens on the middle portion of the osteoderm (see Vizcaíno 1994: fig. 2), and in Anadasypus this occurs more posteriorly (see Carlini et al. 2013: fig. 4). Both sides of the main figure are bounded by lateral figures. There are many foramina (10 or more) on the external surface that open in the sulci delimiting the main figure, and continue on the posterolateral margins. The posterior margin lacks foramina. Stegosimpsonia has up to 20 foramina surrounding the entire main figure, including the posterior border (Vizcaíno 1994; Carlini et al. 2010). Anadasypus has fewer foramina (9) but they are absent at the posterior edge (Carlini et al. 2014; Fig. 4H–J).

  • Measurements.—>14 mm long (anterior portion is broken; the total length could be around 25 mm), 7.5 mm wide, and 3 mm thick.

  • Remarks.—The material shares morphological characteristics with astegotheriins and Anadasypus, a primitive Dasypodini (see Carlini et al. 2013; Castro et al. 2014); hence, it could be considered as a primitive Dasypodini or a derived Astegotheriini. Previously, Babot et al. (2012) described an isolated petrosal bone of a Dasypodinae from Geste Formation at Antofagasta de la Sierra, which has a morphology more similar to Dasypus (Dasypodini) than to other Dasypodinae. However, taking into account the temporal range of Geste formation, and the lack of cranial remains of Astegotheriini to compare, it is difficult a more accurate assignation. The presence of a Dasypodini in Geste Formation might indicate an earlier origin of the group, up to 25 Ma earlier than it is known. Unfortunately, the few remains of this taxon prevent us to adjust the determination and clarify these speculations; probably, best preserved remains could provide new evidence in this regard.

  • Subfamily Euphractinae Winge, 1923
    Tribe Euphractini Winge, 1923
    Genus Parutaetus Ameghino, 1902b

  • Type species: Parutaetus chicoensis Ameghino, 1902 (= P. signatus Ameghino, 1902); Gran Barranca, Lake Colhue-Huapi, Chubut Province, Argentina; Sarmiento Formation; middle—late Eocene.

  • Parutaetus punaensis sp. nov.
    Fig. 5.

  • Etymology: In reference to the Puna, the South American ecoregion where the type locality is located.

  • Holotype: MLP 83-XI-3-2 (Fig. 5A), two fixed osteoderms, one movable osteoderm, and several fragments. All these pieces are associated and included in the same lot.

  • Type locality: Quebrada El Paso, near Pozuelos salt flat, Los Andes Department, Salta Province, Argentina.

  • Type horizon: Middle member of the Geste Formation (sensu Alonso 1992); middle—late Eocene.

  • Material.—MHAS 017—020, 029, PVL 6416, 6575, 6403, 6413–6415, 6407, 6417, 6568, MLP 86-V-6-24, 86-V-6-25, 93-IV-1-17, 93-IV-1-18, fixed and movable osteoderms of the dorsal shield. All specimens from Antofagasta de la Sierra, Catamarca Province, Argentina; middle section of the Geste Formation (sensu Alonso 1992); middle—late Eocene.

  • Diagnosis.—Osteoderms larger than those of other species of the genus, external surface of osteoderms smooth but with numerous small pits. The central figure of the fixed osteoderms is long but does not reach the posterior margin. This figure widens gradually toward the anterior border, differing from other Parutaetus species where the shape changes sharply. The anterior figures are polygonal and well developed as in P. chicoensis and P. chilensis. The anterolateral figures are triangular to subtrapezoidal and smaller than the long posterolateral figures. The anterior portion of the main figure bears two to five well-developed foramina in the intersection of the sulci that delimit the anterior figures from the central one. The piliferous system is restricted to the posterior margin and is poorly developed; it consists of two to five small, well-separated foramina; this trait differs from P. chilensis that exhibit two foramina. The movable osteoderms bear two longitudinal grooves dividing the surface into three low ridges. The central one, the principal figure, is wider anteriorly and thins gradually toward the posterior border. The lateral figures are divided by two shallow transverse sulci in the anterior half of the osteoderm, resulting in two anterolateral figures that are substantially shorter than the posterolateral ones. This pattern differs from P. chilensis which bears only one division and hence only one anterolateral figure, and from P. chicoensis, wherein the transverse sulci are absent. There are two piliferous foramina in each posterior corner.

  • Measurements.—MLP 83-XI-3-2, holotype, fixed osteoderms: 12.5 mm length, 6.4–7 mm width, and 3.3 mm thick; movable osteoderms: 21.6 mm length, 8 mm width, and 3 mm thick. Measurements of fixed osteoderms (referred material): 9–12 mm long, 5.5–9 mm wide, and 3–4.5 mm thick.

  • Description.—Small size, similar to extant Chaetophractus villosus. The osteoderms are smooth, with the contact areas between adjacent osteoderms smooth, concave in section, and with scattered small denticular projections. The fixed osteoderms range from pentagonal at the medial region, to rectangular or cuadrangular towards the lateral portion of the carapace. The figures are convex and well defined by narrow furrows. The main figure is wide at the anterior third and narrower backwards; it extends close to but does not contact the posterior margin. This figure is surrounded by a pair of anterior polygonal figures, two triangular to trapezoidal anterolateral, and two posterolateral ones. The anterolateral figures form a complex rhomboidal figure with those of the adjacent osteoderms. This condition is interpreted as an area covered by a single horny scale, feature present in some basal fossil Dasypodidae. Despite this general description, we identify two different morphotypes of fixed osteoderms, based in the variation of the osteoderm morphology observed in some primitive euphractins, such as Utaetus buccatus, Parutaetus chilensis, Amblytatus, Isutaetus (see Ciancio and Carlini 2008; Carlini et al. 2009, 2010). One group, probably from the lateral zones of the pelvic buckler (Fig. 5A–I), are rectangular (those defined in the diagnosis); and the other, interpreted as part of the central region of the pelvic buckler, includes pentagonal and almost as long as wide osteoderms. The second group of osteoderms (Fig. 5L–Q) is defined characteristics by the development of a semicircular sulcus (instead of singular foramina) in the anterior portion of the main figure. It is common to find this structure in some osteoderms of the central medial zone of the pelvic buckler of euphractins, generally associated to hypertrophied glands. Besides, the main figure is shortened and incorporates the posterolateral figures, acquiring a bell-shaped, and the anterolateral figures are triangular in shape (with the base directed laterally) and generally reach the posterior border. There are small accessory peripheral figures that do not contact with the principal ones in the anterior border of some osteoderms. The triangular lateral figures form a complex rhomboidal figure with that of the adjacent osteoderm. This condition is interpreted as an area covered by a single horny scale, and this characteristic occurs in some basal Dasypodidae.

  • The movable osteoderms (Fig. 5J, K) have a well-defined overlapping portion. In the external surface of the main portion of the osteoderm, there are two longitudinal furrows that define three elongated figures, one central and two laterals. Lateral figures are divided by two transverse furrows on the anterior third, which define two anterolateral figures and a longer posterior one. There are two pairs of foramina on the surface, at the intersection of the furrows that limit the figures. The piliferous system is poorly developed, with two foramina on the posterior corner of the osteoderm.

  • Remarks.—In previous works, some of the isolated osteoderms described here were identified as Utaetus (PVL 6403), a genus restricted to the Barrancan Subage (Casamayoran SALMA) of Patagonia, Prostegotherium notostylopianum (PVL 6407), Prostegotherium (MLP 86-V-6-24, 86-V-6-25, PVL 6413-6420), and Astegotherium (PVL 6412) (Powell et al. 2011; López 1997).

  • This is the first record of Parutaetus in Northwestern Argentina. This genus is known in post Casamayoran—pre Deseadan faunas (middle—late Eocene to early Oligocene) from Patagonia (Ciancio and Carlini 2008; Carlini et al. 2010) and Central Chile (Tinguiririca; Carlini et al. 2009).

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Quebrada El Paso, near Pozuelos salt flat, Los Andes Department, Salta Province and Antofagasta de la Sierra, Catamarca Province, Argentina; middle section of the Geste Formation (sensu Alonso 1992); middle—late Eocene.

  • Fig. 5.

    Osteoderms of euphractin Parutaetus punaensis sp. nov. from the middle member of the Geste Formation, middle—late Eocene, Northwestern Argentina. A. Holotype, MLP 83-XI-3-2; Quebrada El Paso, near the Pozuelos salt flat, Los Andes Department, Salta Province. B–E. Fixed osteoderms from Antofagasta de la Sierra, Catamarca Province; morphotype assigned to the lateral zones of the pelvic buckler, MLP 93-VI-1-17 (B, D), MLP 86-V-6-25 (C, E, F–I), and movable osteoderms, MLP 86-V-10-19 (J), MLP 93-VI-1-18 (K). LQ. Fixed osteoderms from Antofagasta de la Sierra, Catamarca Province; morphotype assigned to the medial zone of the pelvic buckler, MLP 88-V-10-18 (L), MLP 86-V-6-24 (MP), MLP 86-V-6-25 (Q). Photographs (A, B1–Q1), line drawings (B2–Q2).

    f05_575.jpg

    Familia Dasypodidae Gray, 1821
    Dasypodidae incertae sedis
    Genus Pucatherium Herrera, Powell, and del Papa, 2012

  • Type species: Pucatherium parvus Herrera, Powell, and del Papa, 2012; SE de Sierra Aguilar, 23°16′8.51″ S 65°33′21.66″ W, Humahuaca Department, Jujuy Province, Argentina; Casa Grande Formation (middle Eocene?).

  • Pucatherium parvum Herrera, Powell, and del Papa, 2012 (justified emendation, see below)
    Fig. 6A–O.

  • Nomenclatural comment: The original spelling of the epithet of this species (parvus) is incorrect and should be emended into parvum, in accordance with Article 32.5 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Thus a “justified emendation” (Article 33.2.2) is introduced in this work.

  • Material.—Osteoderms of the dorsal shield: MHAS 068–072, PVL 6424, 6400, 6401, MLP 86-V-6-24, 86-V-6-25, 88-V-10-19, and 93-IV-1-17, from Antofagasta de la Sierra, Catamarca Province, middle member of Geste Formation (sensu Alonso 1992); MLP 81-XI-15-3, from Quebrada El Paso, near Pozuelos salt flat, Los Andes Department, Salta Province, Argentina; middle member of Geste Formation (sensu Alonso 1992); PVL 6398, from Vicinities of Laguna and Casa Grande rivers, SE of Sierra Aguilar, Jujuy Province, Argentina; Casa Grande Formation.

  • Description.—Dasypodidae defined by the unique combination of the following characters: from the evidence until now, the dorsal shield was constituted only of movable osteoderms with different degrees of superposition. Osteoderms very small, anterior articular external surface with three, or less frequently two, well-developed longitudinal crests, separated by deep grooves; free posterior external area of movable osteoderms irregular and slightly wrinkled, showing a roughly rectangular main central figure with rounded anterior and posterior portions, reaching the posterior edge of the osteoderm. Lateral grooves of central figure not well-developed with five to seven small perforations each; scarce and small foramina on the lateral and posterior edges of movable osteoderms. Posterior edge of the internal face of the osteoderm with or without short longitudinal elevations and grooves.

  • Remarks.—Pucatherium parvum is a basal Dasypodidae (Herrera 2013) collected in several Paleogene localities from Northwestern Argentina (see SOM). This wide stratigraphic distribution allowed the correlation of these sedimentary units and the assignation of these levels to a Barrancan subage (Casamayoran SALMA; middle Eocene), based on a U/Pb dating of 39.9 Ma obtained from the top of Lumbrera Formation (del Papa et al. 2010; Powell et al. 2011). However, this faunistic correlation based only in one taxon should be contrasted with additional information derived from stratigraphical and evolutionary data of other mammalian taxa and other sources of information.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Middle—late Eocene of Argentina. Antofagasta de la Sierra, Catamarca Province and Quebrada El Paso, near Pozuelos salt flat, Los Andes Department, Salta Province; middle member of Geste Formation (sensu Alonso 1992). Juramento River, La Viña Department, Salta Province; upper section of Lumbrera Formation. Cerro Tin Tin, Cachi Department, Salta Province; Quebrada de los Colorados Formation. Vicinities of Laguna and Casa Grande rivers, south of Aguilar, Jujuy Province; Casa Grande Formation (see Powell et al. 2011 and Herrera et al. 2012).

  • Genus Punatherium nov.

  • Type species: Punatherium catamarcensis gen. et sp. nov., monotypic, see below.

  • Etymology: In reference to the Puna, the South American ecoregion, where the type locality is located; and from the Latin therion, beast; a common generic suffix for xenarthran taxa.

  • Diagnosis.—As for the type species by monotypy.

  • Punatherium catamarcensis sp. nov.
    Fig. 6P, Q.

  • Etymology: In reference to the Catamarca Province (Argentina), where the type locality is located.

  • Type material: Holotype: MLP 93-VI-1-18, fixed osteoderm. Paratype: MLP 86-V-6-24, semimovable osteoderm.

  • Type locality: Antofagasta de la Sierra, Catamarca Province, Argentina.

  • Type horizon: Middle member of Geste Formation (sensu Alonso 1992); middle—late Eocene.

  • Diagnosis.—Dorsal shield osteoderms with rugose surface, with circular foramina in the sulci between figures, and in the lateral and posterior margins. Osteoderms ornamentation with a lageniform principal figure with keeled boss that is rounded and high, and anterior and anterolateral peripheral figures. Fixed osteoderms with large principal lageniform figure that occupies the entire posterior half of the osteoderm and becomes narrower anteriorly, surrounded by three anterior and a pair of anterolateral figures. Semimovable osteoderms also with large lageniform principal figure occupying the posterior two thirds of the dorsal surface, the sulcus surrounding the anterior portion of the principal figure with a row of large circular perforations. At both sides of the narrower part of the main figure there are two pairs of anterolateral figures.

  • Description.—Medium size armadillo, like the extant Chaetophractus villosus, according to the size of the osteoderms. Fixed osteoderms, probably from the pelvic buckler, with the principal figure anteriorly circumscribed by three conspicuous foramina. In addition, there are similar foramina located at the lateral and posterior margins, arranged in one pair at the left border, one single foramen at the right margin, and one pair in the posterior border. There are four peripheral figures on the anterior portion of the main figure. Anterior and lateral contact margins between osteoderms are covered by numerous, low and blunt protuberances. The external surface of the semimovable osteoderm shows a lageniform principal figure, also bordered by a series of large perforations in number of six. As in the case of the fixed osteoderm, there are large perforations in the posterior half of the lateral borders of the osteoderms (two on the left and three on the right). On the posterior border there is not any foramen. Proximally, this osteoderm shows two pairs of peripheral figures at both sides of the narrowest portion of the lageniform figure. The anterior margin of the osteoderm is broken, but it preserves a portion of the cranial overlapping region; the transition zone between the overlapping and main region is smooth and poorly developed.

  • Measurements.—Fixed osteoderm: 13 mm long, 7 mm width, and 3.5 mm thick. Semimovable osteoderm: ca. 16 mm long (the anterior portion is broken, total length could be 20 mm or a bit more), 8 mm width, and 4 mm thick.

  • Remarks.—This new taxon exhibits some particularities, which prevent its correct suprageneric assignation. The lateral contact surfaces (covered by numerous, low, and blunt protuberances), the presence of well-defined figures, and the thickness of the osteoderms are typical of euphractins. The presence of a lageniform main figure is typical of astegotheriins, but it is also present in primitive euphractins (e.g., Archaeutaetus, see Ciancio and Carlini 2008). On the other hand, the presence of foramina around a principal figure (with a well-developed central keel) and the roughness of the external surface resembles Yuruatherium, a peculiar cingulate from the Paleogene of Peru.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Type locality and horizon only.

  • Fig. 6.

    Osteoderms of Dasypodidae incertae sedis from the middle member of the Geste Formation, middle—late Eocene, Antofagasta de la Sierra, Catamarca Province, Argentina. A–O. Pucatherium parvum MLP 93-VI-1-17 (A–F), MLP 88-V-10-19 (G–O). P, Q. Punatherium catamarquensis gen. et sp. nov., holotype, fixed osteoderm, MLP 93-VI-1-18 (P) and paratype, semimovable osteoderm, MLP 86-V-6-24 (Q). Photographs (A1–Q1), line drawings (A2–Q2).

    f06_575.jpg

    Discussion

    Diversity of cingulates in the Geste Formation.—According to the xenarthran record known up to date, the only clade represented in Paleocene and Eocene units from Northwestern Argentina is the cingulate family Dasypodidae. There are neither remains of Pilosa (Tardigrada and Mirmecophaga) nor other groups of cingulates (e.g., Peltephilidae, Pampatheriidae, Glyptodontoidea).

    This taxonomic distribution is in general accordance with that recorded in other South American Eocene sediments. Except some remains of Glyptodontoidea (e.g., Glyptatelus, Palaeopeltis) and Pilosa (a partial jaw referred to Pseudoglyptodon, McKenna et al. 2006) from Patagonia Argentina, almost exclusively armadillos are recorded from the late Eocene. These features in the diversity of Xenarthra are documented mainly in Patagonian areas; however, in more northern regions, such as Paleogene strata of tropical latitudes (Contamana and Santa Rosa localities in Peru, Itaboraí in Brazil) this pattern is also present (Oliveira and Berqgvist 1995; Carlini et al. 2010; Antoine et al. 2012; Ciancio et al. 2013a; Gaudin and Croft 2015).

    The diversity of dasypodids from the fossiliferous levels of the Geste Formation is represented by astegotheriins (Dasypodinae), euphractins (Euphractinae), and some peculiar taxa, which are difficult to assign to a suprageneric ranges. This association exhibits taxonomic and biogeographic relevant features given by a unique specific composition: (i) the presence of taxa related to Patagonian faunas (Parutaetus, Prostegotherium); (ii) peculiar genera only recovered in Argentinean Northwestern units (Pucatherium and Punatherium); (iii) a taxon akin to those described for the Paleogene of Peru (Parastegosimpsonia); and (iv) the absence of dasypodids frequently present in Patagonian faunas (e.g., Stegotheriini, Dasypodinae; Eutatini, Euphractinae).

    In comparison with other beds bearing Eocene cingulate faunas from Northwestern Argentina, the Geste Formation present the greatest diversity of dasypodids (see SOM). Even if these data could indicate a chronological difference, as had been proposed for other mammalian groups (e.g., notoungulates; see García-López and Babot 2015), taphonomic causes should not be ruled out. The sedimentological analysis suggests that the fossiliferous member of Geste Formation was deposited in a high-energy fluvial environment; in this depositional context the skeletal elements of the vertebrates were postmortem disarticulated and scattered. In the case of the cingulates, this fragmentation and disarticulation caused the dispersion of the carapace osteoderms facilitating the posterior finding of the fossil pieces. In the Lumbrera Formation, different depositional conditions led to a rapid burial of the skeletons which remained articulated and hence concentrated in a more restricted area. This fact could be a limiting factor to located fossil pieces of cingulates in the exposed levels.

    In relation with the evolutionary history of the cingulates, the Eocene was characterized by the differentiation, diversification, and extinction of several lineages, highly influenced by the climatic changes that distinguished this period (Carlini et al. 2005, 2009, 2010; Krmpotic et al. 2009; Ciancio 2010; Ciancio et al. 2013a; Woodburne et al. 2014). However, these processes fluctuated among faunas that evolved in different latitudes (e.g., southern South America vs. northern South America), probably as a consequence of regional differences in the climatic conditions. In particular, the presence in Northwestern Argentina of some endemic taxa and other allied with low latitude forms (e.g., Peru), would indicate that some cladogenetic events occurred in subtropical/tropical areas, regardless the contemporaneous changing sequences known for Patagonia (Ciancio et al. 2013a).

    Eocene deposits with continental mammals in northern South America (NSA) are very poor (Marshall et al. 1983), and cingulates were recorded only in three of these localities with very scarce specimens and a low diversity: Itaboraí (Brazil), and Santa Rosa and Contamana (Perú). Conversely, in the Oligocene in low latitudes cingulates are more diverse and better represented, mainly in Bolivia (Salla and Lacayani) and Brasil (Taubaté) (Hoffstetter 1968; Hoffstetter et al. 1971; Oliveira et al. 1997). The pattern of taxonomic composition in Oligocene localities from NSA, is different compared to registered in the same areas during the Eocene. Although, it is interesting the fact of the presence of some taxa that are related with the Patagonian fauna, and the presence of own taxa exclusive of these regions.

    In this context, the Geste Formation (located at intermediate latitude between northern and southern South America) exhibits a particular fauna that evolved in an evolutionary scenario characterized by an early cladogenesis of the xenarthrans. The presence of peculiar taxa displaying features that do not match those that define already known suprageneric categories (e.g., Pucatherium), could be crucial to identify the origin of those events and the evolution of some lineages (Herrera 2013).

    The age of the Geste Formation.—The first chronological assignation proposed to the Geste Formation derived from the work of Turner (1960) where he suggested a Miocene age for this unit. In later decades fossil mammal findings coming from beds exposed near the Pozuelos salt flat (Salta Province), restricted tentatively the age of Geste Formation to the Paleogene, particularly to the Eocene (Pascual 1983). Although this fossiliferous levels were initially interpreted as the base of the Pozuelos Formation (Pascual 1983), posterior studies performed at Antofagasta de la Sierra (Catamarca Province) concluded that the mammal bearing levels pertained to the middle member of Geste Formation (Alonso and Fielding 1986; Alonso 1992). Subsequent paleontological works, based on the mammal “evolutionary degree” supported the former chronological assignation of Pascual (1983), although restricted the relative age to the Mustersan SALMA (Alonso et al. 1988; López and Bond 1995; López 1997; Goin et al. 1998; Reguero et al. 2008), now considered as middle—late Eocene, ca. 38–35 Ma (see Kay et al. 1999; Bond and Deschamps 2010; Dunn et al. 2013).

    The assignation of the middle member of Geste Formation (at Antofagasta de la Sierra and near Pozuelos salt flat) to the Mustersan SALMA, was initially established on the basis of biochronological data derived from the comparison of the evolutionary state of the Northwestern Argentina mammalian associations with the well-known Patagonian mammalian fauna. These studies were mainly based on metatherians and ungulates. According to Goin et al. (1998) the first group suggested a late Eocene age based on the presence of taxa with more derived characters (Punadolops alonsoi and Bonapartherium serrensis) than those recovered from the Lumbrera Formation interpreted as middle Eocene (Pascual et al. 1981, Vucetich and Bond 1982; Bond and Vucetich 1983; Bond and López 1993; Babot et al. 2002). Among the native ungulates recovered at the Geste Formation the presence of notostylopids similar to their Mustersan Patagonian representatives (López 1997), more “advanced” Archaeohyracidae than the Casamayoran species (Reguero et al. 2008; García-López and Babot 2015), the absence of hypsodont notoungulates, and the alleged presence of Propyrotherium (López 1997; but see Reguero et al. 2008 and García-López and Babot 2015) also suggested a pre-Tinguirirican (late Eocene—early Oligocene) age for the Geste Formation mammal-bearing levels. This hypothesis was additionally supported by other data which proposed a biostratigraphic correlation between Geste and Casa Grande formations (Alonso and Fielding 1986; Bond and López 1995). The taxonomic evidence, although poorly supported, was based on the presence of an isotemnid notoungulate recovered from both units and evolutionarily similar to Mustersan taxa (Bond and López 1995; but see García-López and Babot 2015).

    More recent data proposed a relative Barrancan subage (Casamayoran SALMA; middle Eocene, ca. 41.7–39.0 Ma after Dunn et al. 2012) for the fossil-bearing levels of the Geste Formation based on the presence of the particular cingulate Pucatherium parvum also found in Quebrada de los Colorados, Casa Grande, and Lumbrera formations (Powell et al. 2011; Herrera 2012). An isotopic dating revealed 39.9 ± 0.4 Ma at the top of this last unit (del Papa et al. 2010). This result reinforced previous ideas which proposed partial correlations among these units (see previous paragraph and also Hongn et al. 2007 for a correlation between Quebrada de los Colorados and Casa Grande formations).

    However, this last assumption that suggests an older age for the Geste Formation contrasts with other studies which established a correlation between the Geste Formation and the Campo Negro member (lower member) of the Quinoas Formation (Voss 2002) dated at ca. 37.6 Ma (Kraemer et al. 1999) and Loma Amarilla Formation exposed in Salar de Atacama and dated at the base in 39.9 ± 3 Ma (Ramírez and Gardeweg 1982; Mpodozis et al. 2005; Arriagada et al. 2006).

    In agreement with this evidence, absolute isotopic data indicate between 37.3–35.4 Ma for the fossiliferous middle member of Geste Formation outcropping on Pastos Grandes basin (DeCelles et al. 2007; Carrapa and DeCelles 2008); i.e., a middle—late Eocene age, partially equivalent to the Patagonian Mustersan SALMA. Although there are no detailed sedimentological studies, the mammal bearing levels of Geste Formation exposed at Salta Province are considered equivalent to those exposed at Antofagasta de la Sierra. This is consistent with the first biochronological hypothesis founded in the evolutionary degree of the metatherian and ungulate assemblage mentioned above.

    Regarding the cingulate fauna recovered at the Geste Formation, it is difficult to evaluate the chronological relations with other Eocene xenarthran associations because of the peculiarity of the Punean assemblage. The first temporal interpretations were only based on the presence of Astegotheriini in common with the Patagonian assemblages for which a Casamayoran age had been proposed (see Table 1). However, the currently known armadillo diversity here presented opens other interpretations. The Punean diversity includes distinctive genera from the early—middle Eocene of Patagonia (Astegotherium, Prostegotherium), while typical Barrancan genera, such as Utaetus, Stegosimpsonia, or those common at the Mustersan levels (Pseudeutatus, Pachyzaedyus, Anteutatus; Ciancio and Carlini 2008; Carlini et al. 2010) are absent. By other hand, the presence at the Geste Formation of Parutaetus, a frequent genus from middle—late Eocene to early Oligocene levels exposed at Patagonia and Tinquiririca (Chile; Carlini et al. 2009), is consistent with the isotopic age established by DeCelles et al. (2007). The finding of Parastegosimpsonia in the fossiliferous levels of the Geste Formation could also indicate an equivalent age to the Mustersan or a bit earlier of Patagonia (Ciancio et al. 2013a). Summarizing, the taxonomic particularities of the Geste cingulate assemblage prevent us from determining biochronologically the age of these levels and precise equivalence with other South American Eocene units. This also exposes the importance of the Northwestern mammalian fossil association in the context of the study of the diversity and distributional patterns of the South American Paleogene faunas.

    Conclusions

    The species composition of armadillos recovered at the Geste Formation exhibits particular features. It differs from that known for contemporaneous faunas that evolved at Southern latitudes (i.e., Patagonia and central Chile) and younger associations from more tropical areas (i.e., Peru; late Eocene—early Oligocene), although it includes genera with close affinities to those distant areas. In addition, this unit presents unique taxa typical from other Eocene units exposed at Northwestern Argentina. This highlight the evolutionary and biogeographic meaning of the cingulate of the Geste Formation and supports the idea that the faunistic regionalization probably obeyed to latitudinal than to temporal factors.

    Acknowledgements

    We want to especially thank Alfredo A. Carlini (División Paleontología de Vertebrados, MLP), for his important contributions to this work, and take the first impulse for this contribution is made. We thank Enrique Guanuco (San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina) for the drawing. Daniel García-López (PVL), Javier Gelfo (División Paleontología de Vertebrados, MLP), Carolina Madozzo (PVL), Matías Armella (Instituto Superior de Correlación Geológica-CONICET, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina), and Federico Zannier (PVL) provided valuable assistance during fieldworks. We also thank Hugo Carrizo (Fundación Miguel Lillo, Tucumán, Argentina) and Ricardo Grau (Instituto de Ecología Regional, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina) for logistic support, and the Secretaría de Ganadería de Catamarca (San Fernando del Valle de Catamarca, Argentina), especially Carlos Palacios and Lucas Soriano) for housing our research team in the field. We would like to thank both reviewers, Darin Croft (Department of Anatomy, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA) and Marcelo Reguero (División Paleontología de Vertebrados, MLP), for their insightful comments on the paper, as these comments led us to an improvement of the work. Finally, we acknowledge the curators that allowed the study of specimens under their care, Marcelo Reguero (MLP), Jaime Powell (PVL). This study was supported by the Fundación Miguel Lillo (project code IPA-P17 to MJB), Agencia de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (project code PICT 2013-2633 to MRC and PICT 0407) and Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLPFCNyM N-724).

    References

    1.

    Aceñolaza, F., Toselli, A., and Durand, F. 1976. Estratigrafía y paleontología de la región del Hombre Muerto, provincia de Catamarca, Argentina. In : Asociación Paleontológica Argentina (ed.) Abstracts of I Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Bioestratigrafía. Volume 1 , 109–123. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, San Miguel de Tucumán. Google Scholar

    2.

    Alonso, R.N. 1992. Estratigrafía del Cenozoico de la cuenca de Pastos Grandes (Puna salteña) con énfasis en la Formación Sijes y sus boratos. Asociación Geológica Argentina 47: 189–200. Google Scholar

    3.

    Alonso, R.N. and Fielding, E.J. 1986. Acerca de un nuevo yacimiento de vertebrados paleógenos de la Puna argentina (Antofagasta de la Sierra, Catamarca). In : J.F. Bonaparte, M.F. Soria, and F.E. Novas (eds.), Abstracts of III Jornadas Argentinas de Paleontología de Vertebrados, 5. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Asociación Paleontológica Argentina, Buenos Aires. Google Scholar

    4.

    Alonso, R.N., Berman, W.D., Bond, M., Carlini, A.A., Pascual, R., and Reguero, M.A. 1988. Vertebrados Paleógenos de la Puna Austral: sus aportes a la evolución biogeográfica. In : Asociación Paleontológica Argentina (ed.), Abstracts of V Jornadas Argentinas Paleontología de Vertebrados, 6. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo de La Plata, Buenos Aires. Google Scholar

    5.

    Antoine, P.O., Marivaux, L., Croft, D.A., Billet, G., Ganerød, M., Jaramillo, C., Martin, T., Orliac, M.J., Tejada, J., Altamirano, A.J., Duranthon, F., Fanjat, G., Rousse, S., and Salas Gismondi, R. 2012. Middle Eocene rodents from Peruvian Amazonia reveal the pattern and timing of caviomorph origins and biogeography. Proceedings of The Royal Society B 279: 1319–1326. Google Scholar

    6.

    Arriagada, C., Cobbold, P.R., and Roperch, P. 2006. Salar de Atacama basin: A record of compressional tectonics in the central Andes since the mid-Cretaceous. Tectonics 25: TC1008. Google Scholar

    7.

    Babot, M.J. and García López, D.A. 2014. Metatherian petrosals from the middle—late Eocene of Northwestern Argentina. In : E. Cerdeño (ed.), Abstracts Volume of IV International Palaeontological Congress, 648. International Palaeontological Association, Mendoza. Google Scholar

    8.

    Babot, M.J., García López, D.A., and Gaudin, T.J. 2012. The most ancient xenarthran petrosal: morphology and evolutionary significance. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 32: 1186–1197. Google Scholar

    9.

    Babot, M.J., Powell, J.E., and De Muizon, C.H. 2002. Callistoe vincei, a new proborhyaenidae (Borhyeanoidea, Metatheria, Mammalia) from the early Eocene of Argentina. Geobios 35: 615–629. Google Scholar

    10.

    Berqvist, L.P., Abrantes, E.A.L., and Avila, L.D.S. 2004. The Xenarthra (Mammalia) of São José de Itaboraí Basin (upper Paleocene, Itaboriaian), Río de Janeiro, Brazil. Geodiversitas 26: 323–337. Google Scholar

    11.

    Blasco, G. and Zappettini, E. 1996. Hoja Geológica 2566-I San Antonio de los Cobres, provincias de Jujuy y Salta. Dirección Nacional del Servicio Geológico. Boletín 217: 1–126. Google Scholar

    12.

    Blasco, G., Villar, L., and Zappettini, E. 1996. El complejo ofiolítico desmembrado de la Puna argentina. Provincias de Jujuy, Salta y Catamarca. In : Asociación Geológica Argentina (ed.), Actas XIII Congreso Geológico Argentino and III Congreso de Exploración de Hidrocarburos 3: 653–657. Google Scholar

    13.

    Bond, M. and Deschamps, C.M. 2010. The Mustersan Age at Gran Barranca, a review. In : R.H. Madden, A.A. Carlini, M.G. Vucetich, and R.F. Kay (eds.), The Paleontology of Gran Barranca: Evolution and Environmental Change through the Middle Cenozoic of Patagonia , 255–263. University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar

    14.

    Bond, M. and López, G.M. 1993. El primer Notohippidae (Mammalia, Notoungulata) de la Formación Lumbrera (Grupo Salta) del Noroeste argentino. Consideraciones sobre la sistemática de la Familia Notohippidae. Ameghiniana 30: 59–68. Google Scholar

    15.

    Bond, M. and López, G.M. 1995. Los Mamíferos de la Formación Casa Grande (Eoceno) de la Provincia de Jujuy, Argentina. Ameghiniana 32: 301–309. Google Scholar

    16.

    Bond, M. and Vucetich, M.G. 1983. Indalecia grandesis gen. et sp. nov. del Eoceno temprano del Noroeste Argentino, tipo de una nueva subfamilia de los Adianthidae (Mammalia, Litopterna). Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 37: 107–117. Google Scholar

    17.

    Carlini, A.A. and Scillato-Yané, G.J. 1996. Chorobates recens (Xenarthra, Dasypodidae) y un análisis de la filogenia de los Euphractini. Revista Museo de La Plata 59: 225–238. Google Scholar

    18.

    Carlini, A.A., Castro, M.C., Madden, R.H., and Scillato-Yané, G.J. 2013. A new species of Dasypodidae (Xenarthra, Cingulata) from the late Miocene of northwestern South América: implications in the Dasypodini phylogeny and diversity. Historical Biology 26: 728–736. Google Scholar

    19.

    Carlini, A.A., Ciancio, M., and Scillato-Yané, G.J. 2005. Los Xenarthra de Gran Barranca: más de 200 Ma de historia. In : E. Llambías, R. de Barrio, P. González, and P. Leal (eds.), Actas XVI Congreso Geológico Argentino 4: 419–424. Google Scholar

    20.

    Carlini, A.A., Ciancio, M.R., and Scillato-Yané, G.J. 2010. Middle Eocene— Early Miocene Dasypodidae (Xenarthra) of southern South America: faunal succession at Gran Barranca—biostratigraphy and paleoecology. In : R.H. Madden, A.A. Carlini, M.G. Vucetich, and R.F. Kay (eds.), The Paleontology of Gran Barranca: Evolution and Environmental Change through the Middle Cenozoic of Patagonia , 106–129. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar

    21.

    Carlini, A.A., Ciancio, M.R., Flynn, J.J., Scillato-Yané, G.J., and Wyss, A.R. 2009. The phylogenetic and biostratigraphic significance of new armadillos (Mammalia, Xenarthra, Dasypodidae, Euphractinae) from the Tinguirirican (Early Oligocene) of Chile. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 7: 489–503. Google Scholar

    22.

    Carlini, A.A., Gelfo, J.N., and Sánchez, R. 2006. A new Megadolodinae (Mammalia, Litopterna, Protherotheriidae) from the Urumaco Formation (Late Miocene) of Venezuela. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 4: 279–284. Google Scholar

    23.

    Carlini, A.A., Scillato-Yané, G.J., Madden, R.H., Ciancio M.R, and Soibelzon, E. 2002. Los Dasypodidae (Mammalia, Xenarthra) del Eoceno. 3) Las especies del Casamayorense de la Barranca Sur del Lago Colhue Huapi, S de Chubut (Argentina): el establecimiento de los Euphractinae. In : D. Rubilar, A. Vargas, and J. Yañez (eds.), Abstracts of I Congreso Latinoamericano de Paleontología de Vertebrados , 24–25. Sociedad Paleontológica de Chile, Santiago de Chile. Google Scholar

    24.

    Carlini, A.A., Vizcaíno, S.F., and Scillato-Yané, G.J. 1997. Dasypodidae and Glyptodontidae (Mammalia, Edentata) from the Middle Miocene La Venta fauna of Colombia; a unique taxonomic and ecologic assemblage. In : R.F. Kay, R.L. Cifelli, J.J. Flynn, and R.H. Madden (eds.), Vertebrate Paleontology of the Miocene Honda Group, Republic of Colombia , 213–226. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar

    25.

    Castro, M.C., Carlini, A.A., Sánchez, R., and Sánchez-Villagra, M.R. 2014. A new Dasypodini armadillo (Xenarthra: Cingulata) from San Gregorio Formation, Pliocene of Venezuela: affinities and biogeographic interpretations. Naturwissenschaften 101: 77–86. Google Scholar

    26.

    Carrapa, B.D., Adelmann, G.E., Hilley, E., Mortimer, E.R., Sobel, E., and Strecker, M.R. 2005. Oligocene range uplift and development of plateau morphology in the southern central Andes. Tectonics 24: TC4011. Google Scholar

    27.

    Carrapa, B.D. and DeCelles, P.G. 2008. Eocene exhumation and basin development in the Puna of northwestern Argentina. Tectonics 27: TC1015. Google Scholar

    28.

    Ciancio, M.R. 2010. Los Dasypodoidea (Mammalia, Xenarthra) del Deseadense (Oligoceno) de América del Sur. Su importancia filogenética y bioestratigráfica. 290 pp. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad de la Plata, La Plata. Google Scholar

    29.

    Ciancio, M.R. and Carlini, A.A. 2008. Identificación de Ejemplares Tipo Dasypodidae (Mammalia, Xenarthra) del Paleógeno de Argentina. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales 10: 221–237. Google Scholar

    30.

    Ciancio, M.R., Carlini, A.A., Campbell, K., and Scillato-Yané, G.J. 2013a. New Paleogene cingulates (Mammalia, Xenarthra) from Santa Rosa, Peru, and their importance in the context of South American faunas. Journal of Systematic Paleontology 11: 727–741. Google Scholar

    31.

    Ciancio, M., Herrera, C.M., and Babot, M.J. 2013b. Dasipódidos paleó genos del noroeste argentino (Formación Geste, Eoceno). Ameghiniana 50 (6 Supplement ):41–42. Google Scholar

    32.

    Ciancio, M.R., Vieytes, E.C., and Carlini, A.A. 2014. When xenarthrans had enamel: insights on the evolution of their hypsodonty and paleontological support for independent evolution in armadillos. Naturwissenschaften 101: 715–725. Google Scholar

    33.

    Cohen, K.M., Finney, S.C., Gibbard, P.L., and Fan, J.-X. 2013. The ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart. Episodes 36: 199–204. Google Scholar

    34.

    DeCelles, P.G., Carrapa, B., and Gehrels, G.E. 2007. Detrital zircon U-Pb ages provide provenance and chronostratigraphic information from Eocene synorogenic deposits in northwestern Argentina. Geology 35: 323–326. Google Scholar

    35.

    del Papa, C.E., Kirshbaum, A., Powell, J.E., Brod, A., Hongn, F., and Pimentel, M. 2010. Sedimentological, geochemical and paleontological insights applied to continental omission surfaces: A new approach for reconstructing an Eocene foreland basin in NW Argentina. Journal South American Earth Sciences 29: 327–345. Google Scholar

    36.

    Dunn, E.R., Madden, R.H., Kohn, M.J., Schmitz, M.D., Strömberg, C.A.E., Carlini, A.A., Ré, G.H., and Crowley, J. 2013. A new chronology for middle Eocene—early Miocene South American Land Mammal Ages. Geological Society of America, Bulletin 125: 539–555. Google Scholar

    37.

    Fernicola, J.C. and Vizcaíno, S.F. 2008. Revisión del género Stegotherium Ameghino, 1887 (Mammalia, Xenarthra, Dasypodidae). Ameghiniana 45 (2): 321–332. Google Scholar

    38.

    Francia, A. and Ciancio, M.R. 2013. First record of Chaetophractus villosus (Mammalia, Dasypodidae) in the late Pleistocene of Corrientes Province (Argentina). Revista del Museo de La Plata 13: 1–9. Google Scholar

    39.

    García López, D.A. and Babot, M.J. 2015. Notoungulate faunas of north-western Argentina: new findings of early-diverging forms from the Eocene Geste Formation. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 13: 557–579. Google Scholar

    40.

    García López, D.A. and Powell, J. 2011. Griphotherion peiranoi, gen. et sp. nov., a new Eocene Notoungulata (Mammalia, Meridiungulata) from northwestern Argentina. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 31: 1117–1130. Google Scholar

    41.

    Gaudin, T.J. and Croft, D.A. 2015. Paleogene Xenarthra and the evolution of South American mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 96: 622–634. Google Scholar

    42.

    Gelfo, J.N., Chornogbusky, L., López, G.M., Goin, F.J., and Ciancio, M.R. 2010. Biochronological relationships of the mammal fauna from the Paleogene of Las Violetas, Chubut Province, Argentina. In : S. Ballent, A. Artabe, and F. Tortello (eds.), Abstracts of X Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Bioestratigrafía y VII Congreso Latinoamericano de Paleontología, 61. Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Buenos Aires. Google Scholar

    43.

    Goin, F.J., Candela, A., and López, G.M. 1998. Middle Eocene marsupials from Antofagasta de la Sierra, Northwestern Argentina. Geobios 31: 75–85. Google Scholar

    44.

    Goin, F.J., Zimicz, A.N., Forasiepi, A.M., Chornogubsky, L.C., and Abello, M.A. (in press). The rise and fall of South American metatherians: contexts, adaptations, radiations, and extinctions. In : A.L. Rosenberger and M.F. Tejedor (eds.), Origins and Evolution of Cenozoic South American Mammals. Springer Verlag, New York. Google Scholar

    45.

    Hoffstetter, R. 1968. Un gisement de Mamiferes déséadiens (Oligocene inférieur) en Bolivie. Comptes rendus des séances de l´Académie des Sciences, Paris, sér. D 267: 1095–1097. Google Scholar

    46.

    Hoffstetter, R., Martinez, C., Mattauer, M., and Tomasi, P. 1971. Lacayani, un Nouveau Gisement Bolivien de Mammiféres Déséadiens (Oligocéne Inférieur). Comptes rendus des séances de l´Académie des Sciences 273: 2215–2218. Google Scholar

    47.

    Hongn, F.D., del Papa, C., Powell, J., Petrinovic, I., Mon, R., and Deraco, V. 2007. Middle Eocene deformation and sedimentation in the Puna-Eastern Cordillera transition (23°–26°S): Control by preexisting heterogeneities on the pattern of initial Andean shortening. Geology 35: 271–274. Google Scholar

    48.

    Hongn, F.D. and Seggiaro, R.E. 2001. Hoja Geológica 2566-III, Cachi, 1:250.000. Mapa geológico y capítulo Tectónica. SEGEMAR, Boletín 248: 53–65. Google Scholar

    49.

    Herrera, C.M. 2013. Los dasipódidos (Mammalia, Xenarthra) del Paleógeno del Noroeste Argentino. Aspectos evolutivos y bioestratigraficos. 133 pp. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Tucumán. Google Scholar

    50.

    Herrera, C.M. and Powell, J.E. 2009. Un nuevo astegoterino para la Formación Quebrada de los Colorados (Grupo Payogastilla). Ameghiniana 46 (4 Supplement ):32R. Google Scholar

    51.

    Herrera, C.M., Powell, J.E., and del Papa, C.E. 2012. Un nuevo Dasypodidae (Mammalia, Xenarthra) de la Formación Casa Grande (Eoceno) de la provincia de Jujuy, Argentina. Ameghiniana 49: 267–271. Google Scholar

    52.

    Jordan, T.E. and Alonso, R.N. 1987. Cenozoic stratigraphy and basin tectonics of the Andes Mountains, 20°–28° south latitude. American Association of Petroleum Geologist Bulletin 71: 49–64. Google Scholar

    53.

    Jordan, T.E. and Mpodozis, C. 2006. Estratigrafía y evolución tectónica de la cuenca Paleógena Arizaro-Pocitos, Puna Occiden tal (24°–25°). In : Departamento de Ciencias Geoló gicas, Uni versi dad Cató lica del Norte (eds.), Actas of XI Congreso Geologico Chileno 2: 57–60. Google Scholar

    54.

    Kay, S.M., Mpodozis, C., and Coira, B. 1999. Neógeno magmatismo, tectonismo, y los depósitos minerales de los Andes Centrales 22 a 33° S de latitud. In : B.J. Skinner (ed.), Geología y Yacimientos de los Andes Centrales. Sociedad de Geología Económica, Publicación Especial 7: 27–59. Google Scholar

    55.

    Kraemer, B., Adelmann, D., Alten, M., Schnur, W., Erpenstein, K., Kiefer, E., van den Bogaard, P., and Górler, K. 1999. Incorporation of the Paleogene foreland into Neogene Puna Plateau: The Salar de Antofalla, NW Argentina. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 12: 157–182. Google Scholar

    56.

    Krmpotic, C.M., Ciancio, M.R., Barbeito, C., and Carlini, A.A. 2009. Osteoderm morphology in recent and fossil Euphractinae Xenarthrans. Acta Zoologica 90: 339–351. Google Scholar

    57.

    López, G.M. 1997. Paleogene faunal assemblage from Antofagasta de la Sierra (Catamarca Province, Argentina). Paleovertebrata 26: 61–81. Google Scholar

    58.

    López, G.M. and Bond, M. 1995. Un nuevo Notopithecinae (Notoungulata, Typotheria) del Terciario Inferior de la Puna, Argentina. Studia Geológica Salmanticensia 31: 87–99. Google Scholar

    59.

    Marshall, L.G., Hoffstetter, R., and Pascual, R. 1983. Mammals and stratigraphy: Geochronology of the continental mammal-bearing Tertiary of South America. Palaoevertebrata 13 (ext): 1–93. Google Scholar

    60.

    McKenna, M.C., Wyss, A.R., and Flynn, J.J. 2006. Paleogene pseudoglyptodont xenarthrans from central Chile and Argentine Patagonia. American Museum Novitates 3536: 1–18. Google Scholar

    61.

    Mpodozis, C., Arriagada, C., Basso, M., Roperch, P., Cobbold, P., and Reich, M. 2005. Late Mesozoic to Paleogene stratigraphy of the Salar de Atacama Basin, Antofagasta, northern Chile: Implications for the tectonic evolution of the Central Andes. Tectonophysics 399: 125–154. Google Scholar

    62.

    Oliveira, E.V. and Bergqvist, L.P. 1998. A new Paleocene armadillo (Mammalia, Dasypodoidea) from the Itaboraí Basin, Brazil. Asociación Paleontológica Argentina, Publicación Especial 5: 35–40. Google Scholar

    63.

    Oliveira, E.V., Ribeiro, A.M., and Berqvist, L.P. 1997. A new Oligocene Cingulate (Mammalia: Xenarthra) from the Taubaté Basin, Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 69 (4): 461–470. Google Scholar

    64.

    Pascual, R. 1983. Novedosos marsupiales paleógenos de la Formación Pozuelos (Grupo Pastos Grandes) de la Puna, Salta, Argentina. Ameghiniana 20: 265–280. Google Scholar

    65.

    Pascual, R., Bond, M., and Vucetich, M.G. 1981. El Subgrupo Santa Barbara (Grupo Salta) y sus vertebrados. Cronología, paleoambientes y paleobiogeografía. In : Asociación Geológica Argentina (ed.), Actas of VIII Congreso Geológico Argentino 3: 743–758. Google Scholar

    66.

    Powell, J.E., Babot M.J., García López, D.A., Deraco, M.V., and Herrera, C.M. 2011. Eocene vertebrates of northwestern Argentina: annotated list. In : J.A. Salfity and R.A. Marquillas (eds.), Cenozoic Geology of the Central Andes of Argentina , 349–370. SCS Publisher, Salta. Google Scholar

    67.

    Ramírez, C.F. and Gardeweg, M. 1982. Hoja Toconao, Región de Antofagasta (1:250,000), Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería. Carta Geológica de Chile 54: 1–122. Google Scholar

    68.

    Reguero, M.A., Croft, D.C., López, G., and Alonso, R.N. 2008. Eocene archaeohyracids (Mammalia: Notoungulata: Hegetotheria) from the Puna: northwest Argentina. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 26: 225–233. Google Scholar

    69.

    Seggiaro, R. 2007. Hoja Geológica 2569-IV, Antofalla. Provincias de Catamarca y Salta. Instituto de Geología y Recursos Minerales. Servicio Geológico Minero Argentino, Boletín 342: 63. Google Scholar

    70.

    Scillato-Yané, G.J. 1982. Los Dasypodidae (Mammalia, Edentata) del Plioceno de Argentina. 218 pp. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad de la Plata, La Plata. Google Scholar

    71.

    Simpson, G.G. 1948. The beginning of the age of mammals in South America. Part I Introduction. Edentata, Condrylarthra, Liptoterna, and Notioprotogonia. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 91: 1–232. Google Scholar

    72.

    Shockey, B.J., Hitz, R., and Bond, M. 2004. Paleogene notoungulates from the Amazon Basin of Peru. In : K.E. Campbell (ed.), The Paleogene Mammalian Fauna of Santa Rosa, Amazonian Peru , 61–70. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles. Google Scholar

    73.

    Tejedor, M.F., Goin, F.J., Gelfo, J.N., López, G.M., Bond, M., Carlini, A.A, Scillato-Yané, G.J., Woodburne, M.O., Chornogubsky, L., Aragón, E., Reguero, M.A., Czaplewski, N.J., Vincon, S., Martin, G.M., and Ciancio, M. 2009. New early Eocene mammalian fauna from Western Patagonia, Argentina. American Museum Novitates 3638: 1–43. Google Scholar

    74.

    Turner, J.C. 1960. Estratigrafía de la Sierra de Santa Victoria y adyacencias. Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Córdoba 41: 163–196. Google Scholar

    75.

    Turner, J.C. 1961. Estratigrafía del Nevado de Cachi y adyacencias. Acta Geológica Lilloana 3: 191–226. Google Scholar

    76.

    Turner, J.C. 1964. Descripción Geológica de la hoja 7c, Nevado de Cachi, provincia de La Salta. Dirección Nacional de Geología y Minería. Boletín 99: 79. Google Scholar

    77.

    Vizcaíno, S.F. 1994. Sistemática y Anatomía de los Astegotheriini Ameghino, 1906 (Nuevo Rango) (Xenarthra, Dasypodidae, Dasypodinae). Ameghiniana 31: 3–13. Google Scholar

    78.

    Voss, R. 2002. Cenozoic stratigraphy of the southern Salar de Antofalla region, northwestern Argentina. Revista Geológica de Chile 29: 151–165. Google Scholar

    79.

    Vucetich, M.G. and Bond, M. 1982. Los primeros Isotemnidae (Mammalia, Notoungulata) registrados en la Formación Lumbrera (Grupo Salta), del noroeste argentino. Ameghiniana 19: 7–18. Google Scholar

    80.

    Woodburne, M.O., Goin, F.J., Bond, M., Carlini, A., Gelfo, J., López, G., Iglesias, I., and Zimicz, N. 2014. Paleogene Land Mammal faunas of South America; a response to global climatic changes and indigenous floral diversity. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 21: 1–73. Google Scholar

    81.

    Zappettini, E. and Blasco, G. 2001. Hoja Geológica 2569-II, Socompa, provincia de Salta, República Argentina. Servicio Geológico Minero Argentino, Boletín 260: 1–65. Google Scholar
    © 2016 M.R. Ciancio et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (for details please see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    Martín R. Ciancio, Claudia Herrera, Alejandro Aramayo, Patricio Payrola, and Judith Babot "Diversity of Cingulate Xenarthrans in the Middle—Late Eocene of Northwestern Argentina," Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 61(3), 575-590, (29 February 2016). https://doi.org/10.4202/app.00208.2015
    Received: 19 September 2015; Accepted: 1 February 2016; Published: 29 February 2016
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    16 PAGES


    SHARE
    ARTICLE IMPACT
    Back to Top