Translator Disclaimer
4 July 2016 A New Sediment-Dwelling Pholadid Bivalve from Oligocene Glaciomarine Sediments of King George Island, West Antarctica
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We present a re-description of the pholadid bivalve from the Oligocene Polonez Cove Formation, King George Island, West Antarctica, previously identified as Penitella sp. The study is based on a collection of 210 specimens, preserved exclusively in life position in flask-shaped Gastrochaenolites type borings which have been subsequently buried by glaciomarine diamictite. The systematic study showed that this pholadid is a new species belonging to the genus Pholadidea rather than to Penitella and we name it Pholadidea gradzinskii sp. nov. The species is one of very few Late Cretaceous—Paleogene pholadids that we could safely identify as Pholadidea. All of them are known exclusively from the southern Pacific and adjacent areas (New Zealand, Antarctica, and Patagonia). We demonstrate that the genus attained its Recent broad distribution before the middle Miocene, when the first species of Pholadidea appeared in the Northern Hemisphere. The mass occurrence of P. gradzinskii in the Oligocene of West Antarctica results from favourable living condition in a shallow marine environment. Low sedimentation rate allowed the settlement of numerous larvae and their subsequent metamorphosis, growth, and maturity terminated by the mass mortality caused by the burial by marine diamictite. The sediment-boring Paleogene species of Pholadidea, among them P. gradzinskii, follow the wood-boring Late Cretaceous species P. (Hatasia) wiffenae, which reflects a general pattern of evolution of substrate selection among pholadoid bivalves.

Introduction

Marine boring bivalves show an ability to excavate dwelling structures in a variety of solid substrates, among them rock, sediment, peat and wood (e.g., Stanley 1970). This large group consists of eight separate superfamilies, among which pholadoids are the most diverse and broadly distributed (e.g., Coan et al. 2000; Coan and Valentich-Scott 2012). They comprise non-xylophagain pholadids, xylophagains, and teredinids (Haga and Kase 2011). The first group consists of wood-, sediment-, and rock-dwelling filter-feeders occurring mostly in shallow marine environments (e.g., Röder 1977) while the latter two comprise specialized wood-borers living with bacterial symbioses (Distel et al. 2011). The trace fossils questionably attributed to pholadoid bivalves are known from the Carboniferous, but the earliest body fossils of unequivocal pholadoid affinity are known from the Middle Jurassic onwards (Skwarko 1972), with major radiations during the Late Cretaceous (Kelly 1988a) and the Neogene (Kennedy 1974). Characteristic feature of pholadoid bivalve morphology are the highly modified shells which are used to mechanically bore into a solid substrate, and accessorial organic and calcareous plates unique to this group (Röder 1977; Ito 1999).

The pholadoid material described in this paper was first introduced and figured by Gaździcki et al. (1982) as Penitella sp. The current paper compliments the results of the previous study and shows that the species is in fact a new species belonging to the genus Pholadidea Turton, 1819. We discuss the palaeogeographical and evolutionary significance of this new identification and present an interpretation of the ecology of the species in relation to its environmental setting and morphology.

Institutional abbreviations.—ZPAL, Institute of Paleo biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warszawa, Poland.

Geological setting and locality

The investigated material comes from the Polonez Cove Formation cropping out on King George Island, West An tarctica (Figs. 1, 2), representing deposits of a shallow shelf influenced by glacial conditions (e.g., Porębski and Gradziński 1987, 1990; Troedson and Smellie 2002; Quaglio et al. 2014). The siliciclastic deposits, chiefly mudstone, sandstone, and diamictite, contain fossils and volcanoclastic material dating them as middle to late Oligocene (Gaździcka and Gaździcki 1985; Birkenmajer 1989, 2001; Dingle et al. 1997; Dingle and Lavelle 1998). The Oligocene glaciation recorded in the so-called Polonez Glaciation is one of the largest Paleogene glaciations in West Antarctica (Birkenmajer et al. 1991; Dingle et al. 1997; Dingle and Lavelle 1998; Troedson and Smellie 2002). The Polonez Glaciation represents part of the general trend of progressive cooling of the Antarctic continent during the Cenozoic (e.g., Kennet 1977; Barrett 2001; Birkenmajer et al. 2005; Beu 2009).

The investigated material was collected at Mazurek Point on the southern shore of King George Island between the Low Head and Lions Rump areas (Fig. 1). The sampled strata belong to the Siklawa Member of the Polonez Cove Formation, composed of fossil-poor marine sandstone, mudstone, and occasional diamictite interbeds (Fig. 2; Porębski and Gradziński 1987, 1990). The pholadids occur exclusively in mudstone intervals (Fig. 3A) containing bivalve dwelling structures of Gastrochaenolites type (Gaździcki et al. 1982: fig. 5) buried by marine diamictite with metamorphic, granitoid, and limestone clasts of Antarctic continent provenance (Fig. 3B; Birkenmajer and Weiser 1985; Wrona 1989). All of the investigated specimens were collected by AG, Ryszard Gradziński, Szczepan J. Porębski, and Ryszard Wrona in 1980–1981, as well as by AG in 2006–2007 austral summers.

Fig. 1.

A. Map of Antarctic Peninsula area, arrow shows position of King George Island in South Shetland Islands archipelago. B. King George Island showing location of the study area. C. Low Head—Lions Rump area, arrow shows position of Pholadidea gradzinskii sp. nov. horizons at Mazurek Point (after Gaździcki et al. 1982).

f01_885.jpg

Fig. 2.

Simplified lithostratigraphic profile of the Polonez Cove Formation, with lithological profile of the Siklawa Member at Mazurek Point where investigated fossils were collected. The arrow marks the mudstone interval where the majority of the specimens of Pholadidea gradzinskii sp. nov. described in this paper was collected. The lithostratigraphy after Birkenmajer (1983), Porębski and Gradziński (1987), Birkenmajer (2001), Troedson and Smellie (2002). Dating of the units after Smellie et al. (1984), Birkenmajer (1989), Dingle et al. (1997), Dingle and Lavelle (1998), and Troedson and Smellie (2002). The lithological profile of the Siklawa Member at Mazurek Point partially adapted from Gaździcki et al. (1982).

f02_885.jpg

Material and methods

The terminology used herein (Fig. 4) follows that of Turner (1969) with respect to the accessorial plates and Kelly (1988a) with respect to remaining parts of the shell morphology. Additionally we introduce the term “rasp” for coarse sculpture on prora and anterior slope. Although the bivalves described in this paper were excavating their dwelling structures within unconsolidated sediment, the term “boring” is used after Röder (1977) and Ito (1999) instead of “burrow” to underline the unique character of pholadoid bivalve motion while penetrating the substrate. Serial thin sections were prepared according to the method proposed by Joysey and Cutbill (1970). As the specimens examined are fairly large, we decided to section them every 1 mm instead of 0.5 mm as proposed by Kelly (1988a).

Systematic palaeontology

Class Bivalvia Linnaeus, 1758
Order Myoida Goldfuss, 1820
Superfamily Pholadoidea Lamarck, 1809
Family Pholadidae Lamarck, 1809
Subfamily Martesiinae Grant and Gale, 1931
Genus Pholadidea Turton, 1819

  • Type species: Pholadidea loscombiana Turton, 1819: Recent, eastern Atlantic.

  • Remarks.—The genus Pholadidea is characterized by single umbonal-ventral groove, no protoplax (replaced by a dorsal callum extension), no to incipient metaplax and hypoplax (resulting from calcification of periostracum extending beyond the valve), and by longitudinally divided mesoplax (Turner 1955). The genus is subdivided into two subgenera: Pholadidea (Pholadidea) Turton, 1819, and Pholadidea (Hatasia) Gray, 1851. The main criteria of division are the shape and size of the mesoplax, the character of the umbonal reflection and of the siphonal tube. Pholadidea (Pholadidea) has a small, longitudinally divided mesoplax without basal extension and a raised umbonal reflection, and has no siphonal tube. Pholadidea (Hatasia) has longitudinally divided mesoplax with basal extension, an appressed umbonal reflection and has a siphonal tube (Turner 1955).

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.Pholadidea ranges from Cretaceous to Recent according to Crampton (1990). Cretaceous occurences of Pholadidea are rare and most of them require re-examination according to the revised pholadoid systematics of Turner (1954, 1955, 1969). Crampton (1990) described Pholadidea (Hatasia) wiffenae from the Late Cretaceous (Campanian—Maastrichtian) sunken driftwood from the Maungataniwha Sandstone of North Island, New Zealand. The material is well preserved and shows longitudinally divided mesoplax and other features consistent with the definition of Pholadidea (Hatasia), and to our knowledge is the oldest confirmed record of the genus. A similar wood-boring pholadoid species was described from the Maastrichtian sunken driftwood from Quiriquina Formation near Concepción, Chile, as Martesia leali by Stinnes beck (1986). The species is slightly larger than P. (H.) wiffenae and has a very similar shape. The description states that meso-, meta-, and protoplax are unknown. These plates are absent on the holotype (Stinnesbeck 1986: 185, pl. 5: 9b, c). As the meso- and metaplax in the genus Martesia Sowerby, 1824, are large and robust (e.g., Turner 1955, 1969; Coan and Valentich-Scott 2012), and Quiriquina Formation material is found well preserved in life position within the wood, the absence of mesoplax and metaplax of M. leali are unlikely to be caused by taphonomic bias and are most likely a primary feature. The species could therefore potentially belong to Pholadidea, but requires re-examination using its type material before it could be formally included into this genus. Stephenson (1923) recorded three pholadoid species from the Upper Cretaceous (Campanian—Maastrichtian) Black Creek Group, North Carolina, which he attributed to Pholadidea. The species identified as Pho la didea? subconica Stephenson, 1923, and Pholadidea? ci thara Morton, 1834, show characteristic radial ornament on the disc (Stephenson 1923: pl. 87: 12–15), unknown in Pholadidea and most likely do not belong to this genus. The third species, small (ca. 7 mm long) and shell-boring Pholadidea fragilis Stephenson, 1923, does not have such an ornament (Stephenson 1923: pl. 87: 1–11). Stephenson (1923: 348) indicated the species has a double protoplax extending over the beaks. However, the reproduction (Stephenson 1923: pl. 87: 3, 4) does not show protoplax or mesoplax but instead the uncovered dorsal extension of the callum and a calcified periostracum covering the dorsal margin. The species certainly requires revision; in our opinion, it should be rather classified as a member of the genus Diplothyra Tryon, 1862. Another Late Cretaceous species in need of revision is Pholadidea ragsdalensis Stephenson, 1941, from the Navarro Group, Campbell, Texas (Stephenson 1941). It is a fairly small species (holotype ca. 7.5 mm long), boring within walls of large tubular fossils. Its callum partially seals the pedal gape, and the shell has two umbonal-ventral grooves (Stephenson 1941: 246, pl. 44: 5), which are not typical of Pholadidea. The holotype and the only figured specimen is worn and lacks part of the ventral and posterior margins, so it is difficult to estimate the shell shape based on the figure only. Stephenson (1941) mentioned larger specimens he attributed to yet unidentified species of Pholadidea, occurring in a carbonate concretion from the Navarro Group close to Coolidge, Texas. These were poorly preserved and remained unfigured, and we do not comment on their generic affinity. Pholadidea has so far not been reported from Cretaceous xylic (Kelly 1988a) and lithic substrates of Antarctica (Wilckens 1910; Zinsmeister and Macellari 1988).

    Worldwide Paleogene occurrences of Pholadidea are also relatively scarce. The Paleocene Pholadidea? sp. nov. from the Red Bluff Tuff of Pitt Island, Chatham Islands, New Zealand (Campbell et al. 1993: 84) is in fact a species of Jouannetia Des Moulins in Rang and Des Moulins, 1828, (KH personal observation), an opinion also expressed by Crampton (1990). Two Paleogene species of Pholadidea occur in lithic substrates of Patagonia, South America. The older Patagonian species is Pholadidea frenguellii from the Eocene shallow marine sediments of Río Turbio Formation in southwestern Patagonia (Griffin 1991). The species is unknown outside of its type area. The second species was introduced by Philippi (1887) as Pholas patagonica from Oligocene—lower Miocene rocks cropping out near the mouth of Santa Cruz River, eastern Patagonia (Del Río 2004). These identifications were later commented on by Ihering (1897, 1899), who attributed it to the genus Martesia, and by Ortmann (1902) who classified it in Pholadidea. The genus is unkown from Paleogene molluscan faunas of the Seymour Island in West Antarctica (cf. Wilckens 1911; Stilwell and Zinsmeister 1992). The elongate, slender borings from Eocene sunken driftwood from La Meseta Formation (Pirrie et al. 1998) almost certainly have not been made by Pholadidea, which forms short, clavate borings similar to other martesiins (Turner 1955; Turner and Johnson 1971; Crampton 1990). Pholadidea has also not been reported among the bivalves from the remaining part of the Polonez Cove Formation (Gaździcki and Pugaczewska 1984; Quaglio et al. 2014). To our knowledge, Pholadidea has no confirmed fossil record in the Northern Pacific (Kennedy 1974). A possible species of Pholadidea from the Eocene of Kamchatka (Krishtofovich 1947) is not sufficiently well described and figured to confirm this generic assignment. A species reported from Oligocene of Hokkaido, Japan (Uozumi and Fujie 1956) does not belong to Pholadidea as it has a single, undivided mesoplax.

    Since the Neogene Pholadidea is broadly distributed in both hemispheres. Pholadidea patagonica is known from the lower Miocene of Eastern Patagonia (Del Río 2004) and an undescribed pholadoid species forming mass-accumulations at the base of lower Miocene Chenque Formation (Carmona et al. 2007) could also belong to Pholadidea. The latter species is medium sized, fairly short, oval, and has a single umbonal-ventral groove, which is similar to stratigraphically and geographically adjacent P. patagonica. The lack of callum reported by Carmona et al. (2007: 334, fig. 5b) needs to be confirmed. One of the oldest records of the genus in the Northern Hemisphere's Neogene is Pholadidea loscombiana Turton, 1819, from the middle Miocene sands of Ukraine (Friedberg 1934) and from the Miocene of Hungary (Csepreghy-Meznerics 1961). The population of Pholadidea loscombiana was well established in Europe in the younger Neogene and occurs frequently in the Pliocene and Pleistocene (Malatesta and Zarlenga 1986). The genus is also known from the Plio-Pleistocene of New Zealand (Laws 1936; Beu and Maxwell 1990; Beu 2006). Recent distribution of the genus comprises all of the world's oceans apart from Western Atlantic (Turner 1955) and Northern Pacific (Coan et al. 2000). It bores in a variety of substrates like weakly compacted sediment, soft rock or peat in intertidal to subtidal environments down to ca. 120 m water depth (Turner 1955; Coan and Valentich-Scott 2012).

  • Fig. 3.

    A. Outcrops of glaciomarine strata of the Oligocene Polonez Cove Formation (the Siklawa Member) on King George Island, arrow indicates position on Pholadidea gradzinskii horizons at Mazurek Point (photograph by AG, January 2007). B. Diamictite from bed in Siklawa Member of the Polonez Cove Formation, with Pholadidea gradzinskii bearing moulds at the base (arrowed). The diamictite contains metamorphic (m) and granitoid (g) clasts.

    f03_885.jpg

    Fig. 4.

    Schematic illustration of exterior of Pholadidea gradzinskii sp. nov., showing main morphological features discussed. Left lateral (A), anterior (B), dorsal (C), and ventral (D) views.

    f04_885.jpg

    Fig. 5.

    Pholadid bivalve Pholadidea gradzinskii sp. nov. (ZPAL Mo. XVIII/3, holotype) from the Oligocene of King George Island. A. Left-lateral view of the complete specimen (A1), arrow marks deformation of the callum; anterior of the left valve (A2), showing callum covered with growth lines. B. Rightlateral view of the complete specimen (B1), arrow marks deformation of the callum; anterior of the right valve (B2), showing umbonal reflection raised anteriorly and appressed on the umbo. C. Dorsal view of the complete specimen showing metaplax formed by partially calcified periostracal mantle connecting the dorsal margin of the valves. D. Ventral view of the complete specimen showing a hypoplax formed by partially calcified periostracal mantle extending beyond the ventral margin of the shells and connected with the callum; arrows mark deformation of the callum and hypoplax. E. Inclined dorsal view of the anterior showing umbonal reflection covered with the dorsal extension of the callum. F. Anterior view showing the callum and umbonal reflection covered by the dorsal extension of the callum.

    f05_885.jpg

    Pholadidea gradzinskii sp. nov.
    Figs. 57.

  • 1982 Penitella sp.; Gaździcki et al. 1982: 729, figs. 6, 7.

  • ZooBank LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:2C072B3E-3357-4417-B825-8D2FEFC3B2AE

  • Etymology: In honour of the late Professor Ryszard Gradziński, Kraków (1929–2014), in recognition of his understanding of the sedimentology of the Polonez Cove Formation.

  • Type material: Holotype: ZPAL Mo. XVIII/3: a well preserved articulated shell with some details of accessory plates visible. Paratypes: ZPAL Mo XVIII/1, an internal mould with traces of pallial line preserved; ZPAL Mo XVIII/4, an articulated shell with rasp visible; ZPAL Mo XVIII/11, a fragment of the prora and anterior slope showing rasp: ZPAL MoXVIII/12/A–W, a set of acetate peels with transverse sections.

  • Type locality: Cliff at Mazurek Point, King George Island, South Shetland Islands, West Antarctica.

  • Type horizon: Four mudstone intervals bored by P. gradzinskii; capped by diamictite beds; Oligocene, Siklawa Member, Polonez Cove Formation, King George Island, South Shetland Islands, West Antarctica. Three pholadid-bearing beds crop out approximately 20 m above sea level, about a meter above the base of the Siklawa Member. A fourth bed crops out approximately 4.5 m higher in the section.

  • Other material.—Other borings containing fragmentary preserved specimens used for this work were already figured and referred to by Gaździcki et al. (1982). The material stored in ZPAL comprises 210 boring hosting specimens. These are separate weathered boring traces or accumulations of several in loose blocks.

  • Diagnosis.—A large, elongate species of Pholadidea with commarginal ornament. Prora and anterior slope covered with rasp formed by coarse commarginal ridges with few indentations, the disc and posterior slope with fine commarginal growth lines superimposed on broad commarginal folds. Accessory plates highly simplified and formed by partial calcification of periostracum extending beyond the valve (metaplax, hypoplax, siphonoplax) or artophied (mesoplax, protoplax).

  • Description.—Shell up to 62 mm in length and 30 mm in height, with virtually all of the available specimens close to the maximum size. Shell elongated, large for the genus, with moderately thick shell anteriorly and thin posteriorly. Umbo located at 1/6th of the length from the anterior. Most of the shell features (prora, disc, posterior slope) have no clear boundaries, only clear boundary is the umbonal-ventral groove separating the anterior slope from the disc. Prora short and reduced; anterior slope inflated, representing the widest and highest portion of the shell. Pedal gape large, in adults completely sealed by callum; in juveniles partially opened, as suggested by shape of the growth lines. Callum thin and weakly calcified, often deformed; ornamented with growth lines superimposed on radial striae. Dorsal extension of the callum reaches the beaks and covers the umbonal reflection of the shell. The umbonal reflection raised anteriorly anteriorly, more apressed near the beaks. No protoplax and mesoplax observed in any of the investigated specimens. As all investigated specimens are found articulated in life position, we conclude that lack of protoplax and mesoplax is a primary feature. Metaplax is not a true plate, instead being formed by partial calcification of the periostracum connecting the dorsal margin of both valves; fragments close to the shell margins calcified while median part remained uncalcified. Hypoplax similarly is not a true plate but weakly calcified periostracum extending beyond the ventral margin of both valves. Siphonoplax short, pointed, separate in each valve, composed of calcified periostracum connected with that from the ventral and dorsal margin. Ventral margin gapes, with no ventral condyle observed. The ornament of prora and anterior slope composed of 17–20 coarse, densely spaced coarse commarginal ridges with few weak indentations forming a rasp. On the disc and posterior slope the ornament is finer and formed of low commarginal growth lines superimposed over coarser commarginal folds. Umbonal-ventral groove straight, narrow and moderately deep, impressed on the mould. Posterior margin narrow, truncated but pointed when siphonoplax is taken into account. Pallial line weak and only partially visible. Muscle scars unknown.

  • Remarks.Pholadidea gradzinskii does not have a mesoplax, but other characters typical for Pholadidea are present and we conclude that a lack of mesoplax is caused by a secondary reduction and include this species into Pholadidea. However, due to the lack of a mesoplax, which is the most straightforward feature used to separate both subgenera, we restrain from including current species to any subgenus of Pholadidea.

  • Pholadidea gradzinskii differs from P. (Hatasia) wiffenae Crampton, 1990, from the Upper Cretaceous (CampanianMaastrichtian) of New Zealand by its larger size (< 20 mm in lenght for P. (H.) wiffenae), longer and more slender disc and posterior slope, and lack of mesoplax (Crampton 1990). It is much larger and has finer commarginal ornament than P. frenguellii Griffin, 1991, from the Eocene of southwestern Patagonia, which in addition has wider and deeper umbonal-ventral groove (Griffin 1991). Pholadidea gradzinskii sp. nov. differs from P. patagonica (Philippi, 1887) from Oligocenelower Miocene of Eastern Patagonia (Del Río 2004) by its more elongate shell and weaker commarginal ornament on anterior slope. Also, P. gradzinskii has tapering and truncated posterior of the shell, contrasting with rounded posterior of the shell of P. patagonica. The growth lines on the anterior slope of P. gradzinskii reach the umbonal-ventral groove at a weakly acute angle (ca. 80°), which is much more acute (ca. 30°) in P. patagonica (Del Río 2002). Pholadidea gradzinskii is much more elongate than P. finlayi Laws, 1936, from the Pliocene of New Zealand (Laws 1936: pl. 11: 41, 42), and has a somewhat less truncated posterior part of the shell. It has also growth lines transecting the umbonal-ventral groove at less acute angle than P. finlayi. Pholadidea gradzinskii is very similar to P. suteri Lamy, 1926, from the Pleistocene of New Zealand with respect of shape, size and no mesoplax sensu Turner (1969) (see Beu and Maxwell 1990). The rasp of P. suteri is, however, coarser and has well defined radial ribs, unlike that of P. gradzinskii and we prefer to keep both species separate. Pholadidea tridens (Gray, 1843) from the Pleistocene of New Zealand is much shorter than the current species, and has wider umbonal-ventral groove (Beu 2006: fig. 38F).

    Recent species of Pholadidea were discussed by Turner (1955), Beu and Climo (1974) and Coan and Valentich-Scott (2012). Pholadidea gradzinskii is more elongated than P. loscombiana Turton, 1819, which in addition has anterior slope with growth lines forming an sharp acute angle with the umbonal-ventral groove, and has broad, rectangular posterior margin, unlike the current species. Pholadidea gradzinskii is more elongate than P. acherontea Beu and Climo, 1974, which has siphonoplax composed of two separate plates, missing in the current species. Pholadidea (Hatasia) melanura (Sowerby, 1834) has much more inflated and broader callum than P. gradzinskii, and stronger radial threads on the anterior slope. Pholadidea (Hatasia) quadra (Sowerby, 1834) has more rectangular shell and more apressed umbonal reflection than the current species. Pholadidea (Hatasia) tubifera (Sowerby, 1834) has similar shape, but has stronger radial threads on the anterior slope and more appressed umbonal reflection. All the above species of Hatasia contain a mesoplax, a feature entirely missing in P. gradzinskii.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Type locality and horizon only.

  • Fig. 6.

    Pholadid bivalve Pholadidea gradzinskii sp. nov. from the Oligocene of King George Island. A. Paratype, ZPAL XVIII/1; right-lateral view of internal mould showing fragments of the pallial line and the umbonal-ventral groove. B. Paratype, ZPAL Mo XVIII/4 complete shell; anterior (B1) and dorsal (B3) views, showing umbonal reflection covered by dorsal extension of the callum and prora and anterior slope covered with rasp formed by raised commarginal lamellae; left lateral view (B2), showing a strongly elongated shape and pointed siphonoplax; enlarged photo of the anterior of the right valve (B4), showing rasp formed by raised commarginal lamellae. Arrows mark radial striae on the callum, engraved by substrate particles probably during the boring action. C. Paratype, ZPAL Mo XVIII/11; SEM photomicrograph of the prora (C1), showing detailes of rasp formed by coarse commarginal lamellae; detail of coarse commarginal lamellae (C2), showing signs of wearing.

    f06_885.jpg

    Fig. 7.

    Vertical transverse sections through pholadid bivalve Pholadidea gradzinskii sp. nov. (ZPAL Mo XVIII/12/A—W), preserved in life position within a boring from the Oligocene of King George Island. The numbers refer to distance from the anterior of the shell in milimeters. Abbreviations: ap, apophysis; b, beak; ch, chondrophore; cl, callum; dcle, dorsal extension of the callum; hp, hypoplax; mt, metaplax; r, rasp; sp, siphonoplax; ur, umbonal reflection.

    f07_885.jpg

    Discussion

    Palaeobiogeography of Pholadidea.—Available data suggest that during the Late Cretaceous and the Paleogene, Pholadidea did not attain its Recent near-global geographic distribution (Turner 1955). Instead, the genus was largely restricted to the present-day New Zealand and southern South America—Antarctic Peninsula (Fig. 8). During the Late Cretaceous—Paleogene, both areas were located in an embayment of the South Pacific partially isolated from the remaining part of the ocean (Zinsmeister 1982). The relative isolation of this marine basin is reflected by distinctive fauna of the Weddellian Biogeographic Province, extending on the Gondwanan shelves from south-eastern Australia, through New Zealand, Ross Sea shelf and Antarctic Peninsula north to southernmost South America (Zinsmeister 1979). The oldest known species of Pholadidea, the Late Cretaceous (Campanian—Maastrichtian) Pholadidea (Hatasia) wiffenae from New Zealand (Crampton 1990) shows that the genus existed in the western reaches of the province, and then dispersed eastward, reaching southern South America in the Eocene (Griffin 1991), where it remained at least until the sea withdrew from the southern Patagonia after early Miocene (Del Río 2004). Interestingly, the genus is unknown in New Zealand from the post-Cretaceous sediments until the Pliocene (Laws 1936). This may be an artifact, but also may be an actual phenomenon associated with latest Cretaceous—earliest Paleogene climate change in New Zealand due to its northward drift (Zinsmeister 1982) and subsequent re-colonization by cool-water fauna in Neogene due to enhanced Antarctic Circumpolar Current (see Beu et al. 1997). Eastward dispersal of early Pholadidea within the Weddellian Biogeographic Province is likely to be associated with the west-east offshore water circulation existing in southern Pacific during the Late Cretaceous—Paleogene (Lazarus and Caulet 1993). Similar west-east dispersal patterns within Weddellian Biogeographic Province are characteristic for other fossil invertebrate groups, such as struthiolariid gastropods (e.g., Zinsmeister and Camacho 1980) and some brachiopods (e.g., Craig 2000; Bitner et al. 2009). The paucity of fossil record does not allow to precisely date when Pholadidea dispersed outside from the Southern Ocean; it must have happened before the middle Miocene, when the genus is recorded for the first time in the Northern Hemisphere (Friedberg 1934). It may have dispersed northwards along the coast of South America and then trough the Central American Seaway sometime during the Paleogene as suggested for some Southern Ocean crustaceans and brachiopods (e.g., Feldmann 1986; Bitner 1996) or eastward with palaeo-Antarctic Circumpolar Current trough the Drake Passage during the dissolution of Weddellian Biogeographic Province close to the Oligocene—Miocene transition (e.g., Beu et al. 1997).

    Autecology of Pholadidea gradzinskii.—Four beds with P. gradzinskii contain a macrofaunal life-assemblage of hundreds of thousands of specimens of this bivalve buried in life position by glaciomarine sediment (Gaździcki et al. 1982). The formation of monospecific colonies heavily dominated by a single species is not unusual among rock-, shale-, and wood-boring pholadoids (e.g., Röder 1977; Voight 2007; Carmona et al. 2007), and in this respect the Oligocene occurence from King George Island is comparable to many of its fossil and Recent equivalents. The settlement of pholadoid bivalve larvae is controlled by the type of substrate (e.g., Mann and Gallagher 1984), and the successfull growth of already settled larvae is usually dependent on low sedimentation rate protecting the juveniles from burial (Carmona et al. 2007). In the case of P. gradzinskii, the substrate is the glaciomarine mudstone of the Siklawa Member. The entire Polonez Cove Formation is composed of shallow marine clastics with a mixture of clast lithologies, comprising magmatic, metamorphic and volcanic rocks, as well as limestone erratics and recycled stromatolites (e.g., Birkenmajer and Weiser 1985; Wrona 1989; Porębski and Gradziński 1987, 1990; Troedson and Smellie 2002; Gaździcki 2007). The more fine-grained sediments of the Siklawa Member, would provide a good substrate for larval settlement, and the low-sedimentation rate intervals within the member would provide a long-lived colonization surface allowing successful and undisturbed growth of juveniles. The growth must have remained undisturbed for a relatively long time, as all of the specimens found are highly elongated and with gaping ventral margin, suggestive of mature or even gerontic individuals (Röder 1977). Also, the rasp is composed of low and coarse commarginal ridges instead of thin, raised lamellae (Röder 1977: 198, pl. 14: 59–62), suggestive of severe abrasion which could be expected in gerontic individuals. A heavily worn rasp would loose most of it functionality and in effect hamper further anterior boring ability of the bivalve, promoting ventral action and effective widening of the burrow (Röder 1977; Ito 1999) until death and burial of the bivalves beneath the glaciomarine diamictite. The consecutive occurence of similar P. gradzinskii assemblages in four successive beds indicates repetative conditions favouring existance of Pholadidea colonies at the northern edges of the Antarctic during the Oligocene Polonez Glaciation. Continuing cooling of the Antarctic and the development of large polar ice caps in the Neogene effectively removed most of the shallow marine environments from the southern polar seas, contributing to the general paucity of sediment- and rock-boring bivalves in the Antarctic today (Beu 2009).

    Fig. 8.

    Paleogene arrangement of Southern Gondwana with distribution of species of Pholadidea in The Weddellian Biogeographic Province from the Late Cretaceous—Paleogene. Abbreviations: 1, Pholadidea (Hatasia) wiffenae, Campanian—Maastrichtian; 2, Pholadidea frenguellii, Eocene; 3, Pholadidea patagonica, Oligocene—early Mio cene; 4, Pholadidea gra dzinskii, Oligocene; CAS, Central American Seaway; full arrows, possible dispersal route of Pholadidea from New Zealand to Antarctica/South America during the latest Cretaceous and the Paleogene (in the latest Cretaceous situation, New Zealand was immediately adjacent to Australia and Antarctica); stippled arrows, two possible dispersal routes of Pholadidea out from the Weddellian Biogeographic Province. Map adopted after Clarke and Crame (1989).

    f08_885.jpg

    Evolution of boring strategy among pholadoid bivalves.— Pholadoid bivalves apply two different boring strategies: anterior boring and ventral boring (Nair and Ansell 1968). Anterior boring is typical for species boring in rigid substrates (wood or rock; Röder 1977) and it is used at earlier ontogenetic stages; it may be retained during life or may be largely replaced by ventral boring as the specimen matures (Ito 1999, 2005). So far the oldest known pholadoid bivalve and an anterior borer is “Teredoaustralis Moore, 1870, from the Middle Jurassic (Bajocian) sunken driftwood from Australia (Skwarko 1972). Anterior boring pholadoids re-appear in sunken driftwood several times later during the Late Jurassic and the Cretaceous and are known until Recent (Gerasimov 1955; Kelly 1988a, b; Haga and Kase 2011; Schweigert and Schlampp 2014). Ventral boring, on the other hand, is usually applied by species boring in less rigid substrates (firm sediment). The oldest ventral boring pholadoids are Pholas? scaphoides from the Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian) rocks of Texas (Stephenson 1952) and Barnea (Anchomasa) saulae from the Upper Cretaceous (Coniacian—Santonian) rocks of California (Kennedy 1993). Ventral borers are also common in Recent oceans (Röder 1977). The oldest known species of Pholadidea, P. (H.) wiffenae from the Late Cretaceous (Campanian—Maastrichtian) sunken driftwood from New Zealand was a wood borer and had relatively well-developed umbonal-ventral groove, suggestive of anterior boring ability (e.g., Röder 1977; Haga and Kase 2011). However, while the species was preferentially an anterior borer, the ventral boring action must have also taken place, as otherwise the characteristic clavate boring (Crampton 1990: pl. 3: 6) would not be formed. Its younger relative, P. gradzinskii from the Oligocene of the Antarctic bored into the firm sediment, which is more typical for ventral borers. The species has a weak umbonal-ventral groove (Figs. 5, 6), which could support a functional ventral condyle and the anterior boring mechanism only at the earlier ontogenetic stages when the shell was still relatively small. We therefore conclude that the P. gradzinskii was an anterior borer at earlier ontogenetic stages, and for most of its adult development it was a ventral borer. Interestingly, the evolution of boring strategy in Pholadidea proceeded from a predominantly anterior to predominantly ventral borer similar to other pholadoid bivalves (Ito 1999). Our study also suggest that Pholadidea originated on xylic substrates and colonized lithic substrates afterwards. This corroborates the observation of Kelly (1988a), who pointed out that the first Mesozoic wood-boring pholadoids appear long before first Mesozoic sediment-boring pholadoids. Whether these observations represent an actual phenomenon or an artifact of the fossil record remains unconfirmed (cf. Hoagland and Turner 1981).

    Conclusions

    The current study presents the systematic re-description of a pholadid bivalve from the Oligocene glaciomarine sediments from King George Island, West Antarctica. It shows that the new species belongs to the genus Pholadidea rather than to Penitella as suggested by Gaździcki et al. (1982). The new species is one of a few Late Cretaceous—Paleogene species of Pholadidea occurring in the southern Pacific and adjacent areas, which supports the concept of the so-called Weddellian Biogeographic Province (Zinsmeister 1982). The current study also confirms a “wood-before-lithic” pattern of pholadoid substrate adaptation observed by Kelly (1988a) for one more genus.

    Pholadoid systematics is still far from being fully understood. This study shows that many fossil pholadoid bivalve species could be misidentified and that a review of Late Cretaceous—Paleogene fossil pholadoids is long overdue. Since Late Cretaceous was a time of a major evolutionary radiation of pholadoids (Kelly 1988a), a proper identification of fossil material could help to understand the dispersal and evolution of this bivalve group and would be important also for neontologists, for example by providing calibration points for molecular clocks.

    Acknowledgements

    We would like to thank Żaneta Bartosińska (ZPAL) for help in tracking down all of the necessary literature, Grażyna and Marian Dziewińscy (ZPAL) who photographed the fossils, Aleksandra Hołda-Michalska (ZPAL) for help in preparation of graphics, and Adam Zaremba (ZPAL) for preparing the serial section of P. gradzinskii in a very short notice. Sincere thanks go to Alan G. Beu (GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand) for his help regarding Paleocene Pitt Island specimens, and literature on fossil Pholadidea from New Zealand. Special thanks go to journal referees Alan G. Beu and Simon R.A. Kelly (CASP, Cambridge, UK) for their careful reviews and comments that helped to improve the manuscript.

    References

    1.

    Barret, P.J. 2001. Climate change―an Antarctic perspective. New Zealand Science Review 58: 18–23. Google Scholar

    2.

    Beu, A.G. 2006. Marine Mollusca of oxygen isotope stages of the last 2 million years in New Zealand. Part 2. Biostratigraphically useful and new Pliocene to Recent bivalves. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 36: 151–388. Google Scholar

    3.

    Beu, A.G. 2009. Before the ice: biogeography of Antarctic Paleogene molluscan faunas. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 284: 191–226. Google Scholar

    4.

    Beu, A.G. and Climo, F.M. 1974. Mollusca from a Recent coral community in Palliser Bay, Cook Strait. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 8: 307–332. Google Scholar

    5.

    Beu, A.G. and Maxwell, P.A. 1990. Cenozoic Mollusca of New Zealand. New Zealand Geological Survey Paleontological Bulletin 58: 3–518. Google Scholar

    6.

    Beu, A.G., Griffin, M., and Maxwell, P.A. 1997. Opening of Drake Passage gateway and Late Miocene to Pleistocene cooling reflected in South Ocean molluscan dispersal: evidence from New Zealand and Argentina. Tectonophysics 281: 83–97. Google Scholar

    7.

    Birkenmajer, K. 1983. Extent and course of Pliocene glaciation in West Antarctica. Bulletin de L'Academie Polonaise des Sciences, Série des Sciences de la Terre 30: 9–20. Google Scholar

    8.

    Birkenmajer, K. 1989. A guide to Tertiary geochronology of King George Island, West Antarctica. Polish Polar Research 10: 555–579. Google Scholar

    9.

    Birkenmajer, K. 2001. Mesozoic and Cenozoic stratigraphic units in parts of the South Shetland Islands and Northern Antarctic Peninsula (as used by the Polish Antarctic Programmes). Studia Geologica Polonica 118: 5–188. Google Scholar

    10.

    Birkenmajer, K. and Weiser, T. 1985. Petrology and provenance of the magmatic and metamorphic erratic blocks from Pliocene tillites of King George Island (South Shetland Islands, Antarctica). Studia Geologica Polonica 81: 53–97. Google Scholar

    11.

    Birkenmajer, K., Gaździcki, A., Gradziński, R., Kreuzer, H., Porębski, S.J., and Tokarski, A.K. 1991. Origin and age of pectinid-bearing conglomerate (Tertiary) on King George Island, West Antarctica. In : M.R.A. Thomson, J.A. Crame, and J.W. Thomson (eds.), Geological Evolution of Antarctica , 663–665. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar

    12.

    Birkenmajer, K., Gaździcki, A., Krajewski, K.P., Przybycin, A., Solecki, A., Tatur, A., and Yoon, H.I. 2005. First Cenozoic glaciers in West Antarctica. Polish Polar Research 26: 3–12. Google Scholar

    13.

    Bitner, M.A. 1996. Brachiopods from the Eocene La Meseta Formation of Seymour Island Antarctic Peninsula. Palaeontologia Polonica 55: 65–100. Google Scholar

    14.

    Bitner, M.A., Gaździcki, A., and Błażejowski, B. 2009. Brachiopods from the Chlamys Ledge Member (Polonez Cove Formation, Oligocene) of King George Island, West Antarctica. Polish Polar Research 30: 277–290. Google Scholar

    15.

    Campbell, H.J., Andrews, P.B., Beu, A.G., Maxwell, P.A., Edwards, A.R., Laird, M.G., Hornibrook, N.de B., Mildenhall, D.C., Watters, W.A., Buckeridge, J.S., Lee, D.E., Strong, C.P., Wilson, G.J., and Hayward, B.W. 1993. Cretaceous—Cenozoic geology and biostratigraphy of the Chatham Islands, New Zealand. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Monograph 2: 3–269. Google Scholar

    16.

    Carmona, N.B., Mángano, M.G., Buatois, L.A., and Ponce, J.J. 2007. Bivalve trace fossils in an early Miocene discontinuity surface in Patagonia, Argentina: Burrowing behavior and implications for ichnotaxonomy at the firmground—hardground divide. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 255: 329–341. Google Scholar

    17.

    Clarke, A. and Crame, J.A. 1989. The origin of the Southern Ocean marine fauna. In : J.A. Crame (ed.), Origins and Evolution of the Antarctic Biota , 253–268. Geological Society, London. Google Scholar

    18.

    Coan, E.V. and Valentich-Scott, P. 2012. Bivalve seashells of tropical West America. Marine bivalve mollusks from Baja California to Northern Perú. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History Monographs 6: xii–xv, 599–1258. Google Scholar

    19.

    Coan, E.V., Scott, P.V., and Bernard, F.R. 2000. Bivalve seashells of western North America. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History Monographs 2: iii–v, 1–764. Google Scholar

    20.

    Craig, R.S. 2000. The Cenozoic brachiopods of the Carnarvon Basin, Western Australia. Palaeontology 43: 111–152. Google Scholar

    21.

    Crampton, J.S. 1990. A new species of Late Cretaceous wood-boring bivalve from New Zealand. Palaeontology 33: 981–992. Google Scholar

    22.

    Csepreghy-Meznerics, I. 1961. Qelques lamellibranches rares du Miocène de la Hongrie. Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici 53: 133–137. Google Scholar

    23.

    Del Río, C.J. 2002. Moluscos del Terciario Marino. In : M.J. Haller (ed.), Geología y Resurcos Naturales de Santa Cruz, Relatorio del XV Congreso Geológico Argentino II-9: 495–517. Google Scholar

    24.

    Del Río, C.J. 2004. Tertiary marine molluscan assemblages of Eastern Patagonia (Argentina): a biostratigraphic analysis. Journal of Paleontology 78: 1097–1122. Google Scholar

    25.

    Dingle, R.V. and Lavelle, M. 1998. Antarctic Peninsular cryosphere: Early Oligocene (c. 30 Ma) initiation and a revised glacial chronology. Journal of the Geological Society of London 155: 433–437. Google Scholar

    26.

    Dingle, R.V., McArthur, J.M., and Vroon, P. 1997. Oligocene and Pliocene interglacial events in the Antarctic Peninsula dated using strontium isotope stratigraphy. Journal of the Geological Society of London 154: 257–264. Google Scholar

    27.

    Distel, D.L., Amin, M., Burgoyne, A., Linton, E., Mamangkey, G., Morrill, W., Nove, J., Wood, N., and Yang, J. 2011. Molecular phylogeny of Pholadoidea Lamarck, 1809 supports a single origin for xylotrophy (wood feeding) and xylotrophic bacterial endosymbiosis in Bivalvia. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 61: 245–254. Google Scholar

    28.

    Feldmann, R.M. 1986. Palaeobiogeography of two decapod crustacean taxa in the Southern Hemisphere: Global conclusions with sparse data. In : R.H. Gore and K.L. Heck (eds.), Crustacean Biogeography , 5–19. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam. Google Scholar

    29.

    Friedberg, W. 1934. Mięczaki mioceńskie ziem polskich (Mollusca miocaenica Poloniae). Część II. Małże (Pars II. Lamellibranchiata). 158 pp. Fundusz Kultury Narodowej, Kraków. Google Scholar

    30.

    Gaździcka, E. and Gaździcki, A. 1985. Oligocene coccoliths of the Pecten Conglomerate, West Antarcica. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Monatshefte 1985 (12): 727–735. Google Scholar

    31.

    Gaździcki, A. 2007. Provenance of recycled stromatolites from the Polonez Cove Formation (Oligocene) of King George Island, West Antarctica. In : A.K. Cooper, P.J. Barrett, H. Stagg, B. Storey, E. Stump, W. Wise, and the 10th ISAES editorial team (eds.), Antarctica: A Keystone in a Changing World. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Antarctic Earth Sciences, Extended Abstracts 143, 1–3. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. Google Scholar

    32.

    Gaździcki, A. and Pugaczewska, H. 1984. Biota of the “Pecten Conglomerate” (Polonez Cove Formation, Pliocene) of King George Island (South Shetland Islands, Antarctica). Studia Geologica Polonica 79: 59–120. Google Scholar

    33.

    Gaździcki, A., Gradziński, R., Porębski, S.J., and Wrona, R. 1982. Pholadid Penitella borings in glaciomarine sediments (Pliocene) of King George Island, Antarctica. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie un Paläontologie, Monatshefte 1982 (12): 723–735. Google Scholar

    34.

    Gerasimov, P.A. [ Gerasimov, P.A.] 1955. Rukovodăŝie iskopaemye mezozoă central'nyh oblastej evropejskoj častii SSSR. Čast I. Plastinčatožabernye brûhonogie, lad'enogie mollûski i plečenogie ûrskih otloženij. 379 pp. Gosgeoltehizdat, Moskva. Google Scholar

    35.

    Goldfuss, G.A. 1820. Handbuch der Zoologie. Dritter Theil, zweite Abtheilung. 512 pp. Johann Leonhard Schrag, Nürnberg. Google Scholar

    36.

    Grant, U.S. and Gale, H.R. 1931. Catalogue of the marine Pliocene and Pleistocene Mollusca of California. Memoirs of the San Diego Society of Natural History 1: 1–1036. Google Scholar

    37.

    Gray, J.E. 1851. An attempt to arrange the species of Pholadidae into natural groups. Annals of Magazine of Natural History 8: 380–386. Google Scholar

    38.

    Griffin, M. 1991. Eocene bivalves from the Río Turbio Formation, Southwestern Patagonia (Argentina). Journal of Paleontology 65: 119–146. Google Scholar

    39.

    Haga, T. and Kase, T. 2011. Opertochasma somaensis n. sp. (Bivalvia: Pholadidae) from the Upper Jurassic in Japan: a perspective on Pholadoidean early evolution. Journal of Paleontology 85: 478–488. Google Scholar

    40.

    Hoagland, K.E. and Turner, R.D. 1981. Evolution and adaptive radiation of wood-boring bivalves (Pholadacea). Malacologia 21: 111–148. Google Scholar

    41.

    Ihering, H. von 1897. Os molluscos dos terrenos terciarios da Patagonia. Revista do Museu Paulista 2: 217–382. Google Scholar

    42.

    Ihering, H. von 1899. Die Conchylien der patagonischen Formation. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie 1899: 1–46. Google Scholar

    43.

    Ito, Y. 1999. Ontogenetic changes in boring behavior by the rock-boring bivalve, Barnea manilensis (Pholadidae). The Veliger 42: 157–168. Google Scholar

    44.

    Ito, Y. 2005. Functional shell morphology in early developmental stages of a boring bivalve Zirfaea subconstricta (Pholadidae). Paleontological Research 9: 189–202. Google Scholar

    45.

    Joysey, K.A. and Cutbill, J.L. 1970. Serial sections of fossils prepared by the annular sawing technique. In : J.L. Cutbill (ed.), Data Processing in Biology and Geology , 89–95. Academic Press, London. Google Scholar

    46.

    Kelly, S.R.A. 1988a. Cretaceous wood-boring bivalves from Western Antarctica with a review of the Mesozoic Pholadidae. Palaeontology 31: 341–372. Google Scholar

    47.

    Kelly, S.R.A. 1988b. Turnus? davidsoni (de Loriol), the earliest British pholadid wood-boring bivalve from the Late Jurassic of Oxfordshire. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 99: 43–47. Google Scholar

    48.

    Kennedy, G.L. 1974. West American Cenozoic Pholadidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia). San Diego Society of Natural History Memoirs 8: 2–127 + errata. Google Scholar

    49.

    Kennedy, G.L. 1993. New Cretaceous and Tertiary Pholadidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia) from California. Journal of Paleontology 67: 397–404. Google Scholar

    50.

    Kennett, J.P. 1977. Cenozoic evolution of Antarctic glaciation, the circum-Antarctic Ocean, and their impact on global paleoceanography. Journal of Geophysical Research 82: 3843–3860. Google Scholar

    51.

    Krishtofovich, L.V. [ Krištofovič, L.V.] 1947. Stratigraphy and fauna of the Tigil Series of the western coast of Kamchatka [in Russian]. Trudy Vsesoûznogo Neftănogo Naučno-Issledovatel'skogo Geologorazvedoč nogo Instituta (VNIGRI) 232: 1–126. Google Scholar

    52.

    Lamarck J.B.P.A. de M. de 1809. Philosophie zoologique, ou exposition des considérations relatives à l'histoire naturelle des animaux; à la diversité de leur organisation et des facultés qu'ils en obtiennent; aux causes physiques qui maintiennent en eux la vie et donnent lieu aux mouvemens qu'ils exécutent; enfin, à celles qui produisent, les unes le sentiment, et les autres l'intelligence de ceux qui en sont doués. 885 pp. Lamarck, Paris. Google Scholar

    53.

    Lamy, E. 1926. Révision des Pholadidæ vivants du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris (Suite). Journal de Conchylio logie 69: 136–168. Google Scholar

    54.

    Laws, C.R. 1936. The Waitotaran Faunule at Kaawa Creek—Part 1. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand 66: 38–59. Google Scholar

    55.

    Lazarus, D. and Caulet, J.P. 1993. Cenozoic Southern Ocean reconstructions from sedimentologic, radiolarian, and other microfossil data. In : J.P. Kennet and D.A. Warnke (eds.), The Antarctic Paleoenvironment: a Perspective on Global Change. Part 2. Antarctic Research Series 60: 145–174. Google Scholar

    56.

    Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturæ per regna tria naturæ, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio decima. 824 pp. Laurentius Salvius, Holmiae. Google Scholar

    57.

    Malatesta, A. and Zarlenga, F. 1986. Northern guests in the Pleistocene Medi terranean Sea. Geologica Romana 25: 91–154. Google Scholar

    58.

    Mann, R. and Gallagher, S.M. 1984. Physiology of the wood-boring mollusc Martesia cuneiformis Say. Biological Bulletin 166: 167–177. Google Scholar

    59.

    Moore, C. 1870. Australian Mesozoic geology and palaeontology. Quaterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 26: 226–261. Google Scholar

    60.

    Morton, S.G. 1834. Synopsis of the Organic Remains of the Cretaceous Group of the United States. 104 pp. W.P. Gibbons, Philadelphia. Google Scholar

    61.

    Nair, N.B. and Ansell, A.D. 1968. The mechanism of boring in Zirphaea crispata (L.) (Bivalvia: Pholadidae). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 170: 155–173. Google Scholar

    62.

    Ortmann, A.E. 1902. Tertiary invertebrates. In : W.B. Scott (ed.), Reports of the Princeton University Expedition to Patagonia 1896–1899, Vol. 4. Paleontology I, Part 2 , 47–332. J. Pierpoint Morgan Publishing Foundation, Princeton. Google Scholar

    63.

    Philippi, R.A. 1887. Die Tertiären und Quartären Versteinerungen Chiles. 256 pp. F.A. Brockhaus, Leipzig. Google Scholar

    64.

    Pirrie, D., Marshall, J.D., and Crame, A.J. 1998. Marine high Mg calcite cements in Teredolites-bored fossil wood; evidence for cool paleoclimates in the Eocene La Meseta Formation, Seymour Island, Antarctica. Palaios 13: 276–286. Google Scholar

    65.

    Porębski, S.J. and Gradziński, R. 1987. Depositional history of the Polonez Cove Formation (Oligocene), King George Island, West Antarctica: a record of continental glaciation, shallow-marine sedimentation and contemporaneous volcanism. Studia Geologica Polonica 93: 7–62. Google Scholar

    66.

    Porębski, S.J. and Gradziński, R. 1990. Lava-fed Gilbert-type delta in the Polonez Cove Formation (Lower Oligocene), King George Island, West Antarctica. Special Publications. International Association of Sedimentologists 10: 335–351. Google Scholar

    67.

    Quaglio, F., Warren, L.V., Anelli, L.E., Dos Santos, P.R., Rocha-Campos, A.C., Gaździcki, A., Strikis, P.C., Ghilardi, R.P., Tiossi, A.B., and Simões, M.G. 2014. Shell beds from the Low Head Member (Polonez Cove Formation, early Oligocene) at King George Island, west Antarctica: new insights on facies analysis, taphonomy and environmental significance. Antarctic Science 26: 400–412. Google Scholar

    68.

    Rang, P.C. and Des Moulins, C. 1828. Description de trois genres nouveaux de coquille fossile du terrain tertiaire de Bordeaux, savoir: Spiricella, par. M. Rang, correspondant; Gratelupia et Jouannetia, par M. Charles Des Moulins, président. Bulletin d'Histoire Naturelle de la Societé Linnéene de Bordeaux 12: 226–255. Google Scholar

    69.

    Röder, H. 1977. Zur Beziehung zwischen Konstruktion und Substrat bei mechanisch bohrenden Bohrmuscheln (Pholadidae, Teredinidae). Senckenbergiana Maritima 9: 105–214. Google Scholar

    70.

    Schweigert, G. and Schlampp, V. 2014. Wood-borings and wood-boring bivalves from the Late Jurassic of Southern Germany. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 274: 219–227. Google Scholar

    71.

    Skwarko, S.K. 1972. Jurassic fossils of Western Australia. 1. Bajocian Bivalvia of the Newmarracarra Limestone and the Kojarena Sandstone. Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics Bulletin 150: 57–109. Google Scholar

    72.

    Sowerby, G.B.I. 1834. Descriptions of new species of shells from the collection formed by Mr. Cuming on the western coast of South America, and among the islands of the southern Pacific Ocean. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 2 (19): 68–72. Google Scholar

    73.

    Sowerby, J. 1824. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain (5), 65–138. J. Sowerby, London. Google Scholar

    74.

    Stanley, S.M. 1970. Relation of shell form to life habits in the Bivalvia (Mollusca). Geological Society of America Memoir 125: 1–282. Google Scholar

    75.

    Stephenson, L.W. 1923. The Cretaceous formations of North Carolina. Part 1. Invertebrate fossils of the Upper Cretaceous formations. North Carolina Geological and Economic Survey 5: 1–408. Google Scholar

    76.

    Stephenson, L.W. 1941. The larger invertebrate fossils of the Navarro Group of Texas. University of Texas Publication 4101: 1–641. Google Scholar

    77.

    Stephenson, L.W. 1952. Larger invertebrate fossils from the Woodbine Formation (Cenomanian) of Texas. United States Geological Survey Special Paper 242: 1–211. Google Scholar

    78.

    Stilwell, J.D. and Zinsmeister, W.J. 1992. Molluscan systematics and biostratigraphy. Lower Tertiary La Meseta Formation, Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Antarctic Research Series 55: 1–192. Google Scholar

    79.

    Stinnesbeck, W. 1986. Zu den faunistichen und palökologischen verhältnissen in der Quirinquina Formation (Maastrichtium) Zental-Chiles. Palaeontographica A 194: 99–237. Google Scholar

    80.

    Troedson, A.L. and Smellie, J.L. 2002. The Polonez Cove Formation on King George Island, Antarctica: stratigraphy, facies and implications for mid-Cenozoic cryosphere development. Sedimentology 49: 277–301. Google Scholar

    81.

    Tryon, G.W. 1862. Description of a new genus and species of Pholadidae. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 14: 449–451. Google Scholar

    82.

    Turner, R.D. 1954. The family Pholadidae in the western Atlantic and the Eastern Pacific. Part I Pholadinae. Johnsonia 3: 1–64. Google Scholar

    83.

    Turner, R.D. 1955. The family Pholadidae in the western Atlantic and the Eastern Pacific. Part II Martesiinae, Jouannetiinae and Xylophaginae. Johnsonia 3: 65–160. Google Scholar

    84.

    Turner, R.D. 1969. Superfamily Pholadacea Lamarck, 1809. In : R.C. Moore (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Palaeontology, Part N, Volume 2 (of 3), Mollusca, 6, Bivalvia , N702–N741. The Geological Society of America and The University of Kansas Press, Boulder. Google Scholar

    85.

    Turner, R.D. and Johnson, A.C. 1971. Biology of marine wood-boring molluscs. In : E.B. Jones and S.K. Eltringham (eds.), Marine Borers, Fungi and Fouling Organisms of Wood , 259–301. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. Google Scholar

    86.

    Turton, W. 1819. A Conchological Dictionary of the British Islands. 272 pp. J. Booth, London. Google Scholar

    87.

    Uozumi, S. and Fujie, T. 1956. The sand-pipe, created by the pelecypods: Platyodon nipponica n. sp. and Pholadidea (Penitella) kamakurensis (Yokoyama). Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University. Series 4, Geology and Mineralogy 9: 351–369. Google Scholar

    88.

    Voight, J.R. 2007. Experimental deep-sea deployments reveal diverse Northeast Pacific wood-boring bivalves of Xylophagainae (Myoida: Pholadidae). Journal of Molluscan Studies 73: 377–391. Google Scholar

    89.

    Wilckens, O. 1910. Die Anneliden, Bivalven und Gastropoden der antarktischen Kreideformation. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903 3 (12): 1–132. Google Scholar

    90.

    Wilckens, O. 1911. Die Mollusken der antarktischen Tertiär-formation. Wissen schaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903 3 (13): 1–42. Google Scholar

    91.

    Wrona, R. 1989. Cambrian limestone erratics in the Tertiary glacio-marine sediments of King George Island, West Antarctica. Polish Polar Research 10: 533–553. Google Scholar

    92.

    Zinsmeister, W.J. 1979. Biogeographic significance of the Late Mesozoic and Early Tertiary molluscan faunas of Seymour Island (Antarctic Peninsula) to the final breakup of Gondwanaland. In : J. Gray and A. Boucot (eds.), Historical Biogeography, Plate Tectonics and the Changing Environment. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Biological Colloquium and Selected Paper , 349–355. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis. Google Scholar

    93.

    Zinsmeister, W.J. 1982. Late Cretaceous—Early Tertiary molluscan biogeography of the southern circum-Pacific. Journal of Paleontology 56: 84–102. Google Scholar

    94.

    Zinsmeister, W.J. and Camacho, H.H. 1980. Late Eocene Struthiolariidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda) from Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula and their significance to the biogeography of Early Tertiary shallow-water faunas of the southern hemisphere. Journal of Paleontology 54: 1–14. Google Scholar

    95.

    Zinsmeister, W.J. and Macellari, C.E. 1988. Bivalvia (Mollusca) from Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula. In : R.M. Feldmann and M.O. Woodburne (eds.), Geology and Paleontology of Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula , 253–284. Geological Society of America, Boulder. Google Scholar
    © 2016 K. Hryniewicz and A. Gaździcki. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (for details please see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    Krzysztof Hryniewicz and Andrzej Gaździcki "A New Sediment-Dwelling Pholadid Bivalve from Oligocene Glaciomarine Sediments of King George Island, West Antarctica," Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 61(4), 885-896, (4 July 2016). https://doi.org/10.4202/app.00255.2016
    Received: 26 February 2016; Accepted: 1 June 2016; Published: 4 July 2016
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    12 PAGES


    SHARE
    ARTICLE IMPACT
    Back to Top