Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 March 2014 Phoresy of a sucking louse, Linognathus sp. (Phthiraptera: Anoplura: Linognathidae), by Musca (Byomya) conducens Walker (Diptera: Muscidae) in South Africa
Ashley H. Kirk-Spriggs, Eberhard Mey
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

This paper reports the capture of a specimen of Musca (Byomya) conducens Walker, 1859 from Ndumo Game Reserve, South Africa, with two living lice (Linognathus sp.) attached to the legs, one to the left fore tarsus and another to the right mid tarsus. Phoresy in the Anoplura as a whole is extremely rare, and this case represents only the tenth record of phoresy of Anoplura on Diptera and only the fifth record on members of the family Muscidae. This case further represents the first recorded case of the same genus of lice being transported phoretically by more than one dipterous family, i.e., Culicidae and Muscidae. A photograph of one of the lice attached to the right mid tarsus is provided and previous records of anopluran phoresy are reviewed and discussed.

INTRODUCTION

Published records of phoresy by anopluran lice are extremely rare (Braack & Emerson 1986; Durden 1990; Hopkins 1949; Marshall 1981; Thompson 1933) and such cases are worthy of note. Cases of phoresy in the ischnoceran chewing lice (formerly Mallophaga partim), especially on flies of the families Hippoboscidae and Culicidae, have been well documented and appear to be relatively common occurrences (e.g., Harbison et al. 2009; Keirans 1975a, b). Durden (1990) noted, however, that except under unusual circumstances, or in special cases, it is assumed that phoresy is not a widespread phenomenon in the Anoplura.

During fieldwork conducted in Ndumo Game Reserve in 2009, a specimen of Musca (Byomya) conducens Walker, 1859 was captured with two living lice clinging to the tarsi; one to the left fore tarsus and another to the right mid tarsus (Fig. 1).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The fly with the lice still attached was preserved in ethanol, causing the louse attached to the fore leg to become detached. Both lice (two adult females) were cleared in Potassium hydroxide (KOH) and were slide-mounted in Canada balsam. Figure 1 was prepared from an image captured with a Leica EZ4 HD stereo microscope using a built-in digital camera and was photographed using a ring light and dome (Kerr et al. 2008). The lice could not be ascribed to any of the 44 described Afrotropical species of Linognathus (Pajot 2000) and probably represent an undescribed species (Mey and Kirk-Spriggs, in prep.). The body lengths of the two specimens are 1.50 mm and 1.66 mm respectively. Both the fly (BMSA(D)42276) and the slide with two lice (BMSA(Ph)00001) are deposited in the collections of the National Museum, Bloemfontein (BMSA). The fly was trapped adjacent to the main road of the Reserve (26°54.288′S 32°17.974′E) with a Gressitt & Gressitt-style, 6 meter Malaise trap. The trap was located in sand and broad-leafed deciduous forest and was deployed from 4-8 December 2009. This represents only the tenth record of phoresy of Anoplura by Diptera and the fifth record by Muscidae.

Fig. 1.

Photograph of the phoretic Linognathus sp. (Anoplura, Linognathidae) attached to the right mid tarsus of Musca conducens Walker (Muscidae).

f01_119.jpg

DISCUSSION

Durden (1990, table 1) documented six previous studies that report phoresy of Anoplura by Diptera; however, he did not elaborate on the work of Nuttall (1917). Nuttall did not communicate his own observ ations, but only commented on Calandruccio (1890) and referred to Bohne (1915), whose publication he had not seen (see below).

Four records from Durden (1990) are of Muscidae, namely: Mitzmain (1912): Haematopinus tuberculatus (Burmeister) (as H. bituberculatus Nitzsch) (Haematopinidae) from Haematobia irritans exigua de Meijere (as Lyperosia) in the Philippines; Allingham (1987): Haematopinus eurysternus (Nitzsch) (Haematopinidae) from Haematobia irritans exigua (de Meijere), at Popham Bay, Northern Territory, Australia; Bedford (1929: 502): Linognathus vituli (L.) from Musca (Byomya) lasiophthalma Thomson, at Camp's Bay, Cape Town, South Africa; and Braack & Emerson (1986): L. africanus (Kellogg & Paine) (Linognathidae) from H. thirouxi Roubaud, at Kruger National Park, South Africa/Mozambique border.

Worth & Paterson (1960) further reported the capture of Aedes (Neomelanoconion) circumluteolus (Theobald) (Culicidae), with two Linognathus sp. attached to the legs, from Ndumo Game Reserve, South Africa. It is interesting to note that the current record, also of a Linognathus sp., originates from the same locality, and thus represents the first record of the same genus of lice being transported phoretically by more than one fly family (Culicidae and Muscidae). Worth & Paterson (1960) note that Linognathus spp. occur on Red Duiker [or Natal red Duiker], Cephalophus natalensis A. Smith and Grey [or Common] Duiker, Sylvicapra grimmia (L.) (Bovidae), both of which occur in Ndumo Game Reserve. Linognathus spp. are, however, parasites of several ungulates and a few carnivores.

Additional cases not tabulated by Durden (1990) include: Calandruccio (1890): both subspecies of Pediculus humanus L. (as P. vestimenti Nitzsch) (Pediculidae) from “mosche” (= Musca domestica), in Sicily, Italy; Bohne (1915): Pediculus sp. (perhaps humanus) from Musca domestica in Germany; Anonymous (2006): an unidentified louse (“pig louse”, ?Haematopinus suis (L.)) attached phoretically to a calliphorid fly in the United States; Pajot and Germain (1971): Linognathus breviceps (Piaget) (Linognathidae) from Eretmapodites cf. chrysogaster Graham (Culicidae) in Cameroon; and Lang's (1975) experimental work on attachment of head lice to different insects.

Although two of the above Muscidae records are non-Afrotropical (Haematobia irritans exigua from the Philippines and Australia), all the Muscidae species listed above are recorded as occurring in the Afrotropical Region (Pont 1980). Species of Haematobia are blood-sucking flies in the subfamily Stomoxyinae that regularly alight on mammalian hosts for a blood meal. Other muscid flies listed are also associated with man or livestock (Durden 1990). Musca conducens is likewise widespread in the Afrotropical Region and also occurs in the Middle East and the Oriental Region to China and Melanesia (Pont 1980: 724).

As is the case with the current record, Durden (1990) reported that in all cases where the means of louse attachment is described, it involves the louse clinging by the tibiotarsal claws that normally encircle the hair of the mammalian host to one or more fly legs.

Lice phoresy may occur in large numbers. Mitzmain (1912), for example, reported the capture of 620 nymphs of Haematopinus tuberculatus from 1,800 Haematobia irritans exigua in a collection made over a 5-day period in the Philippines. In the present case, however, a total of 5,879 acalyptrate and calyptrate flies (1,930 of these Muscidae) were trapped using Malaise traps at Ndumo Game Reserve over a 14-day period (27 November-10 December 2009). Only one fly had lice attached.

That no adult lice were recorded in Mitzmain's case is understandable, given that the adult body length of Haematopinus tuberculatus is recorded as 3.25–5 mm (Stimie & Van der Merwe 1968). Therefore, it can be assumed, that adult lice of this species are too large to be transported by Haematobia irritans. The same may also apply to the slightly smaller Haematopinus eurysternus, as recorded by Allingham (1987).

Bohne (1915:358) wrote that during the autumn months of 1914, the accommodation and inhabitants of a hospital ship were “… at times very badly affected by a plague of [house] flies, which seemed to originate in a nearby refuse pit. In the course of egglaying by these flies, navy senior physician Dr. Zur Verth noted on two occasions that, when a fly was killed by a blow, immediately afterwards lice were seen to leave the dead flies. In both episodes 3–4 lice were involved”. As this number of adult lice would represent a heavy burden for a house fly, it must be assumed that the lice concerned were nymphs. The adaptive significance of phoresy by Phthiraptera (both Ischnocera and Anoplura) warrants further study.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The specimen of Musca conducens was kindly identified by Márcia Couri (Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). The senior author thanks Charles Haddad and Vaughn Swart (University of the Free State, South Africa), who organized the fieldtrip in Ndumo Game Reserve in 2009 and covered vehicle costs. Specimens were collected under a permit issued by Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife. The first author acknowledges the National Research Foundation (NRF), South Africa, for Incentive Funding for Rated Researchers.

REFERENCES

1.

P.G. Allingham 1987. Phoresy involving a nymph of Haematopinus eurysternus (Nitzsch) and Haematobia irritans exigua De Meijere. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 26 (3): 237–238. Google Scholar

2.

Anonymous . 2006. “What is it”. American Entomologist (Summer) 52 (2): 95, 128. Google Scholar

3.

G.A.H. Bedford 1929. Anoplura (Siphunculata and Mallophaga) from South African hosts. 15th Annual Report of the Director of Veterinary Services, Union of South Africa. October, 1929 15: 501–549. Google Scholar

4.

W. Bohne 1915. Stubenfliegen als Träger von Läusen. Feldärztliche Beilage (Nr. 10) zur Münchener Medizinischen Wochenschrift 62: 358–359. Google Scholar

5.

L.E.O. Braack & K.C. Emerson 1986. A louse phoretic on a haematophagous muscid fly. Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa 49 (1): 161–162. Google Scholar

6.

S. Calandruccio 1890. Animali parassiti dell'uomo in Sicilia. Atti dell'Accademia Gioenia di Scienze Naturali in Catania (Serie Quarta) 2 : 95–135. Google Scholar

7.

L .A. Durden 1990. Phoretic relationships between sucking lice (Anoplura) and flies (Diptera) associated with humans and livestock. The Entomologist 109: 191–192. Google Scholar

8.

C.W. Harbison , M.V. Jacobsen & D.H. Clayton 2009. A hitchhiker's guide to parasite transmission: the phoretic behaviour of feather lice. International Journal of Parasitology 39 (5): 569–575. Google Scholar

9.

G.H.E. Hopkins 1949. The host-associations of the lice of mammals. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 119 (2): 387–604. Google Scholar

10.

J.E. Keirans 1975a. A review of the phoretic relationship between Mallophaga (Phthiraptera: Insecta) and Hippoboscidae (Diptera: Insecta). Journal of Medical Entomology 12 (1): 71–76. Google Scholar

11.

J.E. Keirans 1975b. Records of phoretic attachment of Mallophaga (Insecta: Phthiraptera) on insects other than Hippoboscidae. Journal of Medical Entomology 12 (4): 476. Google Scholar

12.

P.H. Kerr , E.M. Fisher & M.L. Buffington 2008. Dome lighting for insect imaging under a microscope. American Entomologist 54: 198–200. Google Scholar

13.

J. Lang 1975. Transmission of head lice by insects. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 111: 231–232. Google Scholar

14.

A.G. Marshall 1981. The ecology of ectoparasitic insects. London: Academic Press. Google Scholar

15.

M.B. Mitzmain 1912. Collected notes on the insect transmission of surra in carabaos. The Philippine Agricultural Review (Veterinary number) 5 (12): 670–681. Google Scholar

16.

G.H.F. Nuttall 1917. The biology of Pediculus humanus. Parasitology 10 (1): 80–185. Google Scholar

17.

F.-X. Pajot 2000. Les poux (Insecta, Anoplura) de la région afrotropicale. Paris: Editions de I'IRD. Google Scholar

18.

F.-X. Pajot & M. Germain 1971. Note sur un cas nouveau de Phorésie chez les Insectes Transport de Linognathus breviceps (Piaget) [Anoplura Linognathidae] par des Eretmapodites du groupe chrysogaster [Diptera Culicidae]. Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France 76: 5–6. Google Scholar

19.

A.C. Pont 1980. 85. Family Muscidae. In : R.W. Crosskey , ed.. Catalogue of the Diptera of the Afrotropic al Region. London: British Museum (Natural History), pp. 721–761. Google Scholar

20.

M. Stimie & S. Van der Merwe 1968. A revision of the genus Haematopinus Leach (Phthiraptera: Anoplura). Zoologischer Anzeiger 180 (3/4): 182–220. Google Scholar

21.

G.B. Thompson 1933. Association of hippoboscids with lice. Nature 132: 605–606. Google Scholar

22.

C.B. Worth & H.E. Paterson 1960. Phoresy of sucking lice (Siphunculata: Linognathidae) by a mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa 23 (1): 228–230. Google Scholar
Ashley H. Kirk-Spriggs and Eberhard Mey "Phoresy of a sucking louse, Linognathus sp. (Phthiraptera: Anoplura: Linognathidae), by Musca (Byomya) conducens Walker (Diptera: Muscidae) in South Africa," African Invertebrates 55(1), 119-123, (1 March 2014). https://doi.org/10.5733/afin.055.0105
Published: 1 March 2014
KEYWORDS
Afrotropical
Anoplura
host fly
Linognathus
Musca (Byomya) conducens
Muscidae
Ndumo Game Reserve
Back to Top