Translator Disclaimer
29 December 2015 In Honor of Brian Stuckenberg: Two New Spheginobaccha Species of Flower Flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) from the Afrotropics
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The Afrotropical species of genus Spheginobaccha are reviewed and a new identification key is provided. Two new species are described: S. stuckenbergi from Madagascar and S. pamela from South Africa.

INTRODUCTION

Little work that has been done on the Afrotropical flower fly fauna. Beyond a few isolated species descriptions, Loew (1860) was the first to provide a taxonomical treatise of a portion of the Afrotropical fauna. He was followed by Bezzi (1915) who reviewed the whole fauna based on material at the British Museum. Finally Curran (1938a, b; 1939a, b) augmented Bezzi's work based on the material at the American Museum of Natural History (New York). After Curran, there were two regional studies (Hull (1964) (South Africa), Keiser (1971) (Madagascar)). All this work was recently summarised by Dirickx (1998), and Whittington (2003) updated this summary, analysed the previous works and pointed out the genera which are in most need of revision. Since then several papers have appeared and added important information to biology, biogeography and new species descriptions (Barkemeyer 2002; Cheng & Thompson 2008; Dirickx 2001, 2010; Jordaens et al. 2015; Lyneborg & Barkemeyer 2005; Reemer & Ståhls 2013a, b; Reemer & Bot 2015; Smit & Gutierrez-Chacon 2008; Ssymank 2010, 2012; Steenis 2010; Thompson 2013a, b; Thompson & Skevington 2014 and Vujic et al. 2008).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The characters and terminology used follow the glossary of Thompson (1999) and are largely consistent with those used in the Nearctic, Palaearctic and Central American Diptera manuals (McAlpine et al. 1981; Merz & Haenni 2000; Cumming & Wood 2009; and also specific chapters on Syrphidae in Vockeroth & Thompson 1987; Thompson & Rotheray 1998; Thompson et al. 2010). After publication, this article will be converted into species pages within the Encyclopedia of Life (see  www.eol.org). The following acronyms for collections are used:

BMSA

National Museum, Bloemfontein, South Africa (Ashley H. Kirk-Spriggs);

CAS

California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California, USA (Norman Penny);

CSCA

California State Collection of Arthropods, Sacramento, California, USA (Martin Hauser);

NMSA

KwaZulu-Natal Museum, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa (Burgert Muller);

USNM

National Museum of Natural History, [formerly, United States National Museum], Washington D.C., USA.

TAXONOMY

Genus Spheginobaccha de Meijere, 1908

  • Speginobaccha: De Meijere 1908: 327. Type-species: Sphegina macropoda Bigot 1883, by monotypy.

    The genus Spheginobaccha is a rare group of flower flies restricted to the Afrotropical and Oriental faunal regions. Nothing is known of their biology. The genus was revised by Thompson (1974) and since then, only one paper has been published on the Afrotropical species (Dirickx 1995), in which two new species were described. Hull (1949) was the first to include the genus in the Microdontinae. Thompson (1969: 77) excluded the genus from the Microdontinae and later placed the genus in an intermediate position in the Milesinae (now Eristalinae) (Thompson 1972). Thompson (1974: 258) placed the genus in its own tribe and as a basal clade in the subfamily Eristalinae. However, recent DNA sequence data placed the group within the subfamily Microdontinae (Ståhls et al. 2003) and as sister to all other microdontines.

  • Spheginobaccha stuckenbergi sp. n.
    Figs 1–3

  • Etymology: Many species of Spheginobaccha have been named after distinguished dipterists associated with this genus or other flower flies. So, we here dedicate this species to Brian Roy Stuckenberg (1930.iv.07-2009.ii.08; see Kirk-Spriggs (2012)), who made the first modern revision of the genus Paragus Latreille, using male genitalic characters (Stuckenberg 1954a, b).

  • Description:

    Male.

  • Length: Body (HT), 13 mm; wing (HT), 9 mm.

  • Head: Face yellow, sparsely white pollinose medially, denser laterally, white pilose; gena narrow, brownish yellow, white pilose; lunule reddish brown; frons reddish brown, shiny on medial ⅘, narrowly golden pollinose laterally and dorsally, yellowish-white pilose; vertex reddish brown, indistinctly rugose, with fine longitudinal grooves, sparsely greyish-white pollinose, yellow pilose; ocelli distinct, normal; ocellar triangle isosceles, about twice as broad as long; occiput blackish-brown, silvery pollinose, white pilose on ventral ⅔, on dorsal ⅓ reddish brown, sparsely pollinose, white pilose. Antenna orange, black pilose; basoflagellomere large, triangular, about ½ as long as broad; arista black except orange base, as long as basoflagellomere.

  • Thorax: Postpronotum yellow, shiny, white pilose; scutum reddish brown except broadly yellow laterally, sparsely greyish-white pollinose, yellow pilose except bare medially and sublaterally in the form of vittae; postalar callus yellow, yellow pilose; scutellum reddish brown, greyish-white pollinose, yellow pilose; pleuron yellow except black macula posterior to postpronotum, black vitta dorsad to mesocoxa and around metathoracic spiracle, sparsely pollinose except densely silvery white pollinose on katepisternum and posterior anepisternum, white pilose; calypter white; halter yellowish white. Legs: coxae brownish to black, sparsely pollinose, black pilose; trochanters yellowish brown, shiny, black pilose; femora reddish brown to black except basal ¼ and apex white, black pilose except pale on pale areas; protibia brownish black except basal ¼ white, black pilose except pale on pale areas; meso and metatibia brownish black except basal ⅓ white, black pilose except pale on pale areas; tarsi brownish orange, black pilose. Wing: hyaline except dark brown on stigma and area anterior to vein Rs; microtrichose except bare as follows: cell r on basal ¾ posterior to spurious vein, cell bm on basal ⅔, cell cup on basal ⅘, anal lobe on basal ½ and all of alula.

  • Abdomen: Petiolate; 1st segment short, slightly triangular, about ⅛ (0.12) as long as abdomen; 2nd segment cylindrical, about ⅓ (0.28) as long as abdomen; 3rd segment triangular, about twice as wide apically as basally, about ¼ (0.24) as long as abdomen; 4th segment cylindrical, about ⅓ (0.36) as long as abdomen; 1st tergum shiny bluish grey (steel-blue), grey pollinose, white pilose; 2nd tergum bluish grey, sparsely silvery pollinose except for denser basolateral triangular macula, white pilose; 3rd tergum brownish black and black pilose on basal ⅓, bluish grey on apical ⅔. with silvery pollinose macula on medial ⅓, sparsely pollinose apically, white pilose on apical ⅔; 4th tergum brownish black and black pilose on basal ⅕, bluish grey elsewhere except apical margin pale yellowish, with narrow slivery pollinose macula posterior to basal black area, elsewhere sparsely pollinose, white pilose; 1st and 2nd sterna light brownish yellow, sparsely pollinose, white pilose; 3rd and 4th sterna light brownish, black pilose except yellow pilose on apical margin of 4th; male genitalia yellowish brown, white pilose; cercus yellow.

  • Holotype ♂: MADAGASCAR. Mahajanga Province, Majunga Analamanitra Forest, 14 km northeast of Misingo, 16°08′S 45°42′E, 11-18.xii.2007, M. E. Irwin & R. Harin'Hala, Malaise trap, dense dry forest, 65 ft [19.8 m], MG-3811, CASLOT 034973 (deposited in CAS).

  • Paratypes: 3♂ data same as holotype (1♂USNM, 2♂CAS); 1 ♀ same as holotype, except 16-23.x.2007 (CAS); 1♂ Namoroka Village, Befatika Andranovary, 7km nortwest of Vilanandro Village, 16°28.4′S 45°23.48′E, 9-16.xii.2007, M. E. Irwin & R. Harin'Hala, Malaise trap, dense dry forest, 400 ft [122 m], MG-40B-12 (USNM); 2♂ Majunga Ambatofolaka, Namoroka, 53 km from Soalala, 3 km north of Vilanando Village, 16°28.04′S 45°23.48′E, 16-28.xii.2007, M. E. Irwin & R. Harin'Hala, Malaise trap, dense dry forest, 400 ft [122 m] (CAS); 1♂ Parc National, Tsingy de Bemaraha, 3.4 km Bekpaka, Tombeau Vazimba, 19°08′31″S 44°49′41″E, 50 m, 6-10.xi.2001, B. Fisher, lot BLF 4233 (deposited in CSCA).

  • Remarks: Spheginobaccha stuckenbergi is most similar to guttula, both occur in Madagascar, and both have similar antennae, but the new species differs clearly in abdominal pattern and wing microtrichia.

  • Figs 1–3.

    Spheginobaccha stuckenbergi sp. n. Holotype ♂ (Madagascar): (1) habitus, dorsal; (2) head, lateral view; (3) male genitalia, lateral view.

    f01_769.jpg

    Spheginobaccha pamela sp. n.
    Figs 4–6

  • Etymology: We here dedicate this species to Pamela [neé Usher] Stuckenberg, Brian's devoted wife who also published on horse flies (Tabanidae). Proper name in apposition.

  • Description:

    Male.

  • Length: Body (PT), 16.3 mm; wing (PT), 10.6 mm.

  • Head: Black except lunule more reddish brown, sparsely white pollinose, yellow pilose; broadly dichoptic; antenna reddish brown; scape and pedicel black pilose; basoflagellomere light brown; arista yellow.

  • Thorax: Pronotum yellow, yellow pilose; propleuron black anteriorly, yellow posteriorly, yellow pilose; scutum black except dull yellow marginally, sparsely grey pollinose with dark brown pollinose medial vitta, short yellow pilose; postalar callus yellow, yellow pilose; scutellum yellow, yellow pilose; pleuron mainly dull yellow, white pilose, dark on posterior antepisternum; calypter white; halter yellow. Legs: coxae and trochanters black, pale pilose; femora black except yellow on basal ¼, pale pilose on pale areas, black pilose on dark areas; pro and meso tibia black except apical ⅓ reddish brown, black pilose; metatibia yellow on basal ½, black apically, black pilose; pro and mesotarsi brownish black except apical tarsomere reddish, black pilose. Wing: Light brown anteriorly, extending posteriorly to vein R and R4+5 and along veins, elsewhere hyaline, microtrichose except bare cell cup (anal), except for along its margins.

  • Abdomen: Elongate, only very slightly petiolate, black; 1st tergum golden pilose; 2nd tergum mainly light brown pilose, except with apical margin broadly golden pilose and with a small apicomedial triangle patch of black pile; 3rd tergum dull black pollinose except sparsely greyish white pollinose basolaterally, black pilose except white pilose basolateral and along lateral margin; 4th tergum golden pilose; genitalia white pilose.

  • Holotype ♂: SOUTH AFRICA: KwaZulu-Natal: Manguzi Forest Reserve, 26°59′32″S 32°43′25″E, 61 m, 13-17.xii.2010, Malaise trap in indigenous sand forest, A. K. Kirk-Spriggs, specimen code BMSA(D) 30059 (deposited in BMSA).

  • Paratypes: 1♂ same data as holotype with specimen code BMSA(D) 30058 (deposited in USNM); 1♂ KwaZulu-Natal: St. Lucia Estuary, 10.ii.1974 W.W. Middlekauf (deposited in CAS).

  • Remarks: As noted in the key to species below, pamela is most similar related to guttula, but differs in abdominal coloration, the male genitalia and the shape of the antenna.

  • Figs 4–6.

    Spheginobaccha pamela sp. n. Paratype ♂ (Madagascar): (4) habitus, dorsal view; (5) habitus, lateral view; (6) genitalia, lateral view.

    f04_769.jpg

    Spheginobaccha ruginosa Dirickx, 1995

  • Spheginobaccha ruginosa: Dirickx 1995: 152.

    This species was originally described from two females from Madagascar (Ivondro & Montagne d'Ambre). We examined 9 additional females.

  • Material examined: MADAGASCAR: 1♀ Fianarantosa Prov., ANGAP Hqt, Panomafana (Town), Malaise trap near stream, 21°14.91′S 47°27.13′E, 740 m, 28.xi-6.xii.2001, lot MG9D-05 (CSCA); 1♀ Vohinparara Ranomafana NP, Malaise trap in rain forest, 21°13.57′S 47°21.19′E, 1110 m, 5-15.vii.2002, M. E. Irwin & R. Harin'Hala, lot MG 9A34 (CSCA); 2♀[Same locality as previous], 14-21.i.2002, lot MG 9A12 (1♀ CSCA, 1♀ USNM); 1♀ Parc. National Ranomafana Belle Vue at Talatakely, 1020 m, 21°15.99′S, 47°25.21′E, 1020 m; malaise, secondary tropical forest, MA-02-09c-62; 28.v-6.vi.2003, R. Harin'Hala; CAS lot 018111 (CAS); 1♀ [same locality data as previous]MEI 98-MA-7, 21 December 1999, CASENT8018161 (1 ♀ CAS); 1♀ Radio tower at forest edge, 1130m 7-17.v.2003 21°15.05′S, 47°24.43′E, 7-17.v.2003; malaise, mixed tropical forest, MA-02-09B-60, R. Harin'Hala CASlot 018077 (1 ♀ CAS); 2♀ Antananarivo: 46 Km NE of Ankazobe: Ambohitantely, 18°11.88'S, 47°16.89′E, 700 m, malaise trap, in sclerophyll forest, MA-27-2, 14-29.xi.2004, M.Irwin, R. Harin'Hala CAS lot 025651 (1♀ CAS, 1♀USNM).

  • Spheginobaccha rotundiceps (Loew, 1858)

  • Ocyptamus rotundiceps: Loew 1858: 376;

  • Spheginobaccha rotundiceps: Thompson 1974: 276 (see also for complete synonymy).

    This species was originally described from “Caffrerei,” and known from only 3 specimens (Thompson 1974: 278). We examined 7 additional specimens collected from South Africa.

  • Material examined: SOUTH AFRICA: KwaZulu-Natal: Royal Natal National Park, Thendale, 28°42.378′S 28°56.083′E, Leucosedea dominated scrub, 1600 m, 15-17.ii.2010, A. H. Kirk-Spriggs (4 ♂ 1 ♀ BMSA, 1♂ USNM); 1♀ Tiger Falls area, 28°41.341′S 28°56.047′E, Protea caffra woodland, 1545 m, 17-18.ii.2010, A. H. Kirk-Spriggs (BMSA).

  • Key to Afrotropical Spheginobaccha

    1 Alula microtrichose 6

    — Alula bare 2

    2 Basoflagellomere large, triangular, about ½ as long as broad. Abdomen dark, without yellow or tawny coloration, with basal ¼ of 3rd tergum black, followed by white pollinose macula, then grey; 4th tergum similar colored (Fig. 1) (Madagascar) stuckenbergi sp. n.

    — Basoflagellomere small, oval to elongate, about as long as or longer than broad 3

    3 Wing completely microtrichose except for bare alula (South Africa) rotundiceps (Loew, 1858)

    — Wing extensively bare basally 4

    4 Face black pilose; basoflagellomere elongate, about twice as long as broad (South Africa) dexioides Hull, 1944

    — Face pale pilose, white to golden; basoflagellomere oval, about as long as broad 5

    5 Frons rugose, with distinct transverse grooves; basal cells (R & BM) entirely microtrichose; cell CuP (anal) bare; face white pilose (Madagascar) ruginosa Dirickx, 1995

    — Frons not rugose; basal cells partially bare; cell CuP microtrichose on posterior ⅓; face golden pilose (South Africa) dubia Thompson, 1974

    6 Anterior ocellus sunken into a cleft and divided into two parts (Malawi) perialla Thompson, 1974

    — Anterior ocellus normal, neither divided nor sunken into a cleft 7

    7 Basal cells extensively bare; abdomen pale yellow on basal 3 terga except with dark brown maculae on ⅔ of 3rd and light brown on rest of abdomen (see Dirickx 1995: 155, fig. 9) (Madagascar) guttula Dirickx, 1995

    — Basal cells entirely microtrichose; abdomen with 1st tergum dark brown, 2nd tergum light brown, 3rd tergum pale brown on basal ⅓, dark brown apically (South Africa) pamela sp. n.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    This paper was developed and written by the senior author. The junior author joined the effort during the review process when he added additional material and significant enhancements. This report represents the first contribution to a comprehensive understanding of the Madagascan flower fly fauna based on the new and enriched collections made through the support of the Schlinger Foundation.

    We acknowledge the Schlinger Foundation for establishing the entomological survey of Madagascar and the US National Science Foundation (grant DEB-0072713) for their continued support of the survey. Mike E. Irwin (Vail, AZ) and Harin'Hala (Rin'ha) Rasolondalao (Antananarivo, Madagascar) are thanked for all the organizing and the field work, collecting, and sorting of the material. We thank all the curators of the various collections listed above for their help and loan of material. Brian Fisher, Charles Griswold and Norman Penny of the California Academy of Sciences, were critical in making material available to us. We thank Taina Litwak, Department of Entomology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, for the male genitalia figures. Naturally, we thank our colleagues for their review and critical comments on the manuscript: Norman Woodley, Systematic Entomology Laboratory, ARS, US Department of Agriculture, Washington and Jeffrey Skevington, Canada Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa.

    REFERENCES

    1.

    Barkemeyer, W. 2002. Zur Syrphiden fauna der Kapverdischen Inseln (Diptera: Syrphidae). Mitteilungen des Internationale Entomologischen Vereins 27 (1/2): 9–28. Google Scholar

    2.

    Bezzi, M. 1915. The Syrphidae of the Ethiopian Region based on material in the collection of the British Museum (Natural History), with descriptions of new genera and species. London: British Museum (Natural History). Google Scholar

    3.

    Cheng, X.-Y. & Thompson, F.C. 2008. A generic conspectus of the Microdontinae (Diptera: Syrphidae) with the description of two new genera from Africa and China. Zootaxa 1879: 21–48. Google Scholar

    4.

    Cumming, J.M. & Wood, D.M. 2009. Adult morphology and terminology. In: Brown, B.V. , Borkent, A. , Cumming, J.M. , Wood, D.M. , Woodley, N.E. & Zumbado, M.A. , eds, Manual of Central American Diptera. Vol. 1. Ottawa: NRC Research Press, pp. 9–50. Google Scholar

    5.

    Dirickx, H.G. 1995. Le Genre Spheginobaccha de Meijere à Madagascar (Diptera: Syrphidae). Annales de la Société entomologique de France 31 (2): 151–156. Google Scholar

    6.

    Dirickx, H.G. 1998. Catalogue synonymique et géographique des Syrphidae (Diptera) de la région afrotropicale. Instrumenta Biodiversitatis 2: 1–187. Google Scholar

    7.

    Dirickx, H.G. 2001. Notes sur le genre Melanostoma Schiner, 1860 (Diptera, Syrphidae) à Madagascar et les îles voisines avec descriptions de cinq espèces nouvelles. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 108 (4): 993–1029. Google Scholar

    8.

    Dirickx, H.G. 2010. Notes sur le genre Allobaccha Curran, 1928 (Diptera, Syrphidae) à Madagascar avec descriptions de cinq nouvelles espèces. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 117: 213–233. Google Scholar

    9.

    Hull, F.M. 1944. Some genera of flies of the family Syrphidae. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 34: 129–132. Google Scholar

    10.

    Hull, F.M. 1949.The morphology and Inter-relationship of the Genera of syrphid flies, recent and fossil. Transaction of the Zoological Society of London 26 (4): 257–408. Google Scholar

    11.

    Hull, F.M. 1964. Diptera (Brachycera): Syrphidae. South African Animal Life 10: 442–496. Google Scholar

    12.

    Jordaens, K. , Goergen, G. , Kirk-Spriggs, A.H. , Vokaer, A. , Backeljau, T. & De Mayer, M. 2015. A second New World hoverfly, Toxomerus floralis (Fabricius) (Diptera: Syrphidae), recorded from the Old World, with description of larval pollen-feeding ecology. Zootaxa 4044 (4): 567–576. Google Scholar

    13.

    Keiser, F. 1971. Syrphidae von Madagaskar (Dipt.). Verhandlungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Basel 81: 223–318. Google Scholar

    14.

    Kirk-Spriggs, A.H. 2012. Dedication: the life, career and major achievements of Brian Roy Stuckenberg (1930–2009). African Invertebrates 53: 1–34. Google Scholar

    15.

    Loew, H. 1858[1857]. Bidrag till kännedomen om Afrikas Diptera [part]. Öfversig af Kongliga Vetenskapsakademiens förhandlingar 14: 337–383. Google Scholar

    16.

    Loew, H. 1860. Die Dipteren-Fauna Südafrika's. Erste Abthleilung. Berlin: G. Bosselman. Also published in: Giebel, C & Heintz, W. , eds, Abhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereines für Sachsen und Thüringen in Halle 2 (1858–1861): 57–402. Google Scholar

    17.

    Lyneborg, L. & Barkemeyer, W. 2005. The genus Syritta. A world revision of the genus Syritta Le Peletier & Serville, 1828 (Diptera: Syrphidae). Entomonograph 15: 1–224. Google Scholar

    18.

    McAlpine, J.F. 1981. Morphology and terminology-Adults. In: McAlpine, J.F. et al., eds, Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Vol. 1. Monograph 27. Ottawa: Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, pp. 9–63 Google Scholar

    19.

    Meijere, J.C.H. de 1908. Studien über Südostasiatische Dipteren. III. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 51: 191–332, pls 7-8. Google Scholar

    20.

    Merz, B. & Haenni, J.-P. 2000. Morphology and terminology of adult Diptera (other than terminalia). In: Papp, L. & Darvas, B. , eds, Contributions to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera (with special reference to flies of economic importance). Volume. 1, General and Applied Dipterology. Budapest: Science Herald, pp. 21–52. Google Scholar

    21.

    Reemer, M. & Ståhls, G. 2013a. Generic revision and species classification of the Microdontinae (Diptera, Syrphidae). ZooKeys 288: 1–213. Google Scholar

    22.

    Reemer, M. & Ståhls, G. 2013b. Phylogenetic relationships of Microdontinae (Diptera: Syrphidae) based on molecular and morphological characters. Systematic Entomology 38 (4): 661–688. Google Scholar

    23.

    Reemer, M. & Bot, S. 2015. Six new species of Microdon Meigen from Madagascar (Diptera: Syrphidae). Zootaxa 4034(1): 127–147. Google Scholar

    24.

    Rotheray, G.E. & Gilbert, F. 2011. The Natural History of hoverflies. Ceredigion, UK: Forrest Text. Google Scholar

    25.

    Smit, J.T. & Gutierrez-Chacon, C. (2008) A new species of the Paragus serratus-group from Yemen (Diptera: Syrphidae). Zoologische Mededelingen 82: 211–216. Google Scholar

    26.

    Ssymank, A. 2010. Review of the species of Betasyrphus Matsumura, 1917 (Diptera: Syrphidae) from Madagascar with description of a new species. Zootaxa 2417: 40–50. Google Scholar

    27.

    Ssymank, A. 2012. A contribution to the Syrphidae (Diptera) fauna of Cameroon, with a preliminary checklist of the family. African Invertebrates 53 (1): 249–266. Google Scholar

    28.

    Ståhls, G. , Hippa, H. , Rotheray, G.E. , Muona, J. & Gilbert, F. 2003. Phylogeny of Syrphidae (Diptera) inferred from combined analysis of molecular and morphological characters. Systematic Entomology 28: 433–450. Google Scholar

    29.

    Steenis. J. van 2010. A new species of the genus Syritta Le Peletier & Serville, 1828 (Diptera, Syrphidae), with new distributional records of other Syritta species. Norwegian Journal of Entomology 57: 111–119. Google Scholar

    30.

    Stuckenberg, B. R. 1954a. Studies on Paragus, with descriptions of new species (Diptera Syrphidae). Revue de zoologie et de botanique africaines 49: 97–139. Google Scholar

    31.

    Stuckenberg, B. R. 1954b. The Paragus serratus complex, with descriptions of new species (Diptera: Syrphidae). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 105: 393–422. Google Scholar

    32.

    Thompson, F.C. 1969. A new genus of microdontine flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) with notes on the placement of the subfamily. Psyche 7 (1): 74–85. Google Scholar

    33.

    Thompson, F.C. 1972. A contribution to a generic revision of the Neotropical Milesinae (Diptera: Syrphidae). Arquivos de Zoologia 23: 73–215. Google Scholar

    34.

    Thompson, F.C. 1974. The genus Spheginobaccha de Meijere (Diptera: Syrphidae). Transactions of the American Entomological Society 100 (3): 255–287. Google Scholar

    35.

    Thompson, F.C. 1999. A key to the genera of the flower flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) of the Neotropical Region including the descriptions of genera and species and a glossary of taxonomic terms. Contributions on Entomology, International 3 (3): 319–378. Google Scholar

    36.

    Thompson, F.C. 2013a. A new Afrotropical cerioidine flower fly with an overview of the group (Diptera: Syrphidae, Cerioidini). Entomologist's monthly magazine 149: 71–77. Google Scholar

    37.

    Thompson, F.C. 2013b. A new Afrotropical cerioidine flower fly (Diptera: Syrphidae). Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft 86: 145–150. Google Scholar

    38.

    Thompson, F.C. & Rotheray, G.E. 1998. Family Syrphidae. In: Papp, L. & Darvas, B. , eds, Contributions to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera (with special reference to flies of economic importance). Volume. 3: Higher Brachycera. Budapest: Science Herald, pp. 81–139. Google Scholar

    39.

    Thompson, F.C. , Rotheray, G.E. & Zumbado, M.A. 2010. Syrphidae (Flower flies). In: Brown, B.V. , Borkent, A. , Cumming, J.M. , Wood, D.M. , Woodley, N.E. & Zumbado, M.A. , eds, Manual of Central American Diptera. Vol. 2. Ottawa: NRC Research Press, pp. 763–792. Google Scholar

    40.

    Thompson, F.C. & Skevington, J.H. 2014 Afrotropical flower flies (Diptera: Syrphidae). A new genus and species from Kenya, with a review of the melanostomine group of genera. Zootaxa 3847 (1): 97–114. Google Scholar

    41.

    Vockeroth, J.R. & Thompson, F.C. 1987. Syrphidae. In: McAlpine, J.F. et al. eds, Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Vol 2. Monograph 28. Ottawa: Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, pp. 713–743 Google Scholar

    42.

    Vujic, A. , Ståhls, G. , Rojo, S. , Radenkovic, S. & Simic, S. 2008. Systematics and phylogeny of the tribe Paragini (Diptera: Syrphidae) based on molecular and morphological characters. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 152: 507–536. Google Scholar

    43.

    Whittington, A.E. 2003. The Afrotropical Syrphidae fauna: An assessment. Studia dipterologica 10: 579–607. Google Scholar
    F. Christian Thompson and Martin Hauser "In Honor of Brian Stuckenberg: Two New Spheginobaccha Species of Flower Flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) from the Afrotropics," African Invertebrates 56(3), 769-777, (29 December 2015). https://doi.org/10.5733/afin.056.0318
    Published: 29 December 2015
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    9 PAGES


    SHARE
    ARTICLE IMPACT
    Back to Top