Registered users receive a variety of benefits including the ability to customize email alerts, create favorite journals list, and save searches.
Please note that a BioOne web account does not automatically grant access to full-text content. An institutional or society member subscription is required to view non-Open Access content.
Contact helpdesk@bioone.org with any questions.
You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither BioOne nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the BioOne website.
8 April 2016A Comment on Horcajada-Sánchez and Barja (2015): A Cautionary Tale about Left Truncation and Density Gradients in Distance Sampling
1Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, The Observatory, Buchanan Gardens, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9LZ Scotland, UK ( ); and Departamento de Estatística e Investigação Operacional, Faculdade de Ciências da
Tiago A. Marques "A Comment on Horcajada-Sánchez and Barja (2015): A Cautionary Tale about Left Truncation and Density Gradients in Distance Sampling," Annales Zoologici Fennici 53(1–2), 52-54, (8 April 2016). https://doi.org/10.5735/086.053.0204
Received: 22 September 2015; Accepted: 29 December 2015; Published: 8 April 2016
Tiago A. Marques "A Comment on Horcajada-Sánchez and Barja (2015): A Cautionary Tale about Left Truncation and Density Gradients in Distance Sampling," Annales Zoologici Fennici, 53(1–2), 52-54, (8 April 2016)
