Translator Disclaimer
2 January 2013 Isolation and Characterization of Microsatellite Loci for a Bioenergy Grass, Miscanthus sacchariflorus (Poaceae)
Author Affiliations +

Miscanthus Andersson (Poaceae) is a genus of C4 photosynthetic grass species. Two of these species, M. sacchariflorus (Maxim.) Hack, and M. sinensis Andersson, have received considerable attention as potential bioenergy crops because of their ability to produce very high yields of biomass. Miscanthus xgiganteus J. M. Greef & Deuter, the most cultivated species in Europe with respect to biomass production, is an artificially interspecific hybrid between M. sinensis and M. sacchariflorus. As an indigenous species to a wide geographic range in Asia, M. sacchariflorus provides suitable “climate- and soil-matched” genotypes for most agricultural climates, and thus became a target species for breeding and selection of bioenergy crops (Clifton-Brown et al., 2008). Microsatellites have been proven to be useful markers for population genetic studies and assessment of genetic resources due to their advantages as molecular markers, such as codominance and hypervariability. Although a few dozen micro satellites have been isolated in M. sinensis, a close relative of M. sacchariflorus (Hung et al., 2009; Zhou et al., 2011; Ho et al., 2011), some of these loci could not amplify efficiently in M. sacchariflorus and the number of markers available for M. sacchariflorus is still limited. Many microsatellites transferred from distinct species such as maize or Brachypodium distachyon (L.) P. Beauv. by cross-taxa amplification have also failed in Miscanthus species (Hernández et al., 2001; Zhao et al., 2011). Here we describe the isolation and evaluation of 23 novel microsatellite loci in M. sacchariflorus, which will be used in further assessment of the genetic diversity and germplasm characterization to facilitate molecular markerassisted selection and breeding of this species and its relatives.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The microsatellite-enriched library was constructed from a single individual of M. sacchariflorus (Fuxin County, Liaoning Province, China, 42°00′03.4″N, 121°46′27.2″E) following the protocol of Glenn and Schable (2005). Specimen vouchers were deposited at the Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (PE). Leaf samples were collected and dried in silica gel immediately upon collection. Genomic DNA was extracted from dried leaves using a cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method (Doyle and Doyle, 1987). The genomic DNA was digested (into fragments smaller than 500 bp) with the enzyme RsaI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA) and ligated into the SuperSNX linkers (SuperSNX24 Forward: 5′-GTTTAAGGCCTAGCTAGCAGCAGAATC; SuperSNX24 + 4P Reverse: 5′-GATTCTGCTAGCTAGGCCTTAAACAA). The digestion-ligation mixture was independently hybridized with 3′ biotinylated oligo probes (TG)12, (AG)12, and (AAG)8 and captured by magnetic streptavidin Dynabeads (Dynal Biotech, Oslo, Norway) for enrichment of repeat fragments. Captured and enriched DNA was recovered by PCR amplification using the SuperSNX24 forward primer. The recovered DNA was directly ligated into a pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) and transformed into competent cells of Escherichia coli.

A total of 350 positive colonies were sequenced, and 160 contained repeats. Ninety-eight sequences showed clear microsatellite motifs and contained sufficient flanking regions for primer design. Fifty-six primers were designed with Primer Premier 5.0 (PREMIER Biosoft International, Palo Alto, California, USA). PCR amplifications were performed in a 15 µL volume on GeneAmp PCR System 9700 thermocyclers (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA). Final concentrations for optimizing reactions were 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 200 µM of each dNTP, 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 0.5 U exTaq polymerase (TaKaRa Biotechnology Co., Dalian, Liaoning, China), 10 ng genomic DNA, 0.5 µM marker-specific primer pairs, 0.033 µM marker-specific M13-tailed (TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT) forward primer, and 0.5 µm HEX-, TAMRA-, or FAM-labeled M13 primer (adapted from Schuelke, 2000). A PCR cycling profile was as follows: initial denaturation of 95°C for 3 min, followed by 28 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 58–54°C for 40 s, and 72°C for 40 s, and a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. PCR products with different fluorescences were analyzed on an ABI3730XL sequencer with GS500 LIZ size standard (Applied Biosystems), and genotypes were scored using GeneMapper version 4.0 software (Applied Biosystems). All primer pairs were assayed in individual PCRs using samples from two M. sacchariflorus populations in China: pop-D40 containing 22 individuals (Heilongkou, Shangluo City, Shaanxi Province, 34°01′19.1″N, 108°58′02.0″E) and pop-D49 consisting of 28 individuals (Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province, 38°03′17.2″N, 114°21′51.2″E). Specimen vouchers were deposited at PE (accession no.: D40 and D49, respectively). Finally, a total of 23 novel polymorphic microsatellite loci were isolated from M. sacchariflorus; characteristic information is provided in Table 1. None of these loci were the same as those reported previously using BLASTN similarity analysis in GenBank. All microsatellite loci except DSSR24 showed a dinucleotide repeat motif (Table 1). The number of alleles per locus, fragment length, and the observed and expected heterozygosities (Ho and He) were calculated with Arlequin 3.1 (Excoffier et al., 2005). Tests of deviation from Hardy—Weinberg equilibrium for each locus in each population were conducted using GenePop version 4.0 software (Rousset, 2008).

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of 23 microsatellite loci in Miscanthus sacchariflorus.

t01_01.gif

In pop-D40, the number of alleles per locus varied from two to 10, with an average of 5.65, and the Ho and Heper locus ranged from 0.182 to 1.0 and from 0.169 to 0.844, respectively (Table 2). In pop-D49, the number of alleles per locus varied from two to 13, with an average of 5.83, and the Hoand He per locus ranged from 0.179 to 1.0 and from 0.223 to 0.853, respectively (Table 2). With all samples considered together, DSSR11 and DSSR24 were dimorphic in two M. sacchariflorus populations. DSSR25 showed the highest polymorphism with 18 alleles, followed by DSSR2 with 13 alleles. The mean number of alleles per locus was 8.13. The Hoand Heper locus ranged from 0.200 (DSSR12) to 1.0 (DSSR13) and from 0.349 (DSSR12) to 0.898 (DSSR17) excluding two dimorphic loci, respectively (Table 2). Six loci (DSSR13, DSSR20, DSSR24, DSSR40, DSSR32, DSSR35) in pop-D40 showed significant deviation from expectation under HWE while eight markers (DSSR2, DSSR13, DSSR20, DSSR23, DSSR24, DSSR34, DSSR40, DSSR39) in pop-D49 showed significant deviation (P < 0.01) (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Results of initial primer screening in two populations of Miscanthus sacchariflorus.

t02_01.gif

CONCLUSIONS

The novel microsatellite loci developed here showed polymorphism in M. sacchariflorus populations. These markers will be used to gain a better understanding of various evolutionary questions including population genetic diversity and differentiation, population demography, and gene flow of Miscanthus species. They are also valuable tools in further molecular breeding and population genetic studies of M. sacchariflorus and its relatives.

LITERATURE CITED

1.

J. Clifton-Brown, Y.-C. Chiang, and T. R. Hodkinson . 2008. Miscanthus: Genetic resources and breeding potential to enhance bioenergy production. In W. Vermerris [ed.], Genetic improvement of bioenergy crops. Springer, New York, New York, USA. Google Scholar

2.

J. J. Doyle , and J. L. Doyle . 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11–15. Google Scholar

3.

L. Excoffier , G. Laval , and S. Schneider . 2005. Arlequin ver. 3.0: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 1: 47–50. Google Scholar

4.

T. C. Glenn , and N. A. Schable . 2005. Isolation microsatellite DNA loci. Methods in Enzymology 395: 202–222. Google Scholar

5.

P. Hernández , G. Dorado , D. A. Laurie , A. Martín , and J. W. Snape . 2001. Microsatellites and RFLP probes from maize are efficient sources of molecular markers for the biomass energy crop Miscanthus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 102: 616–622. Google Scholar

6.

C.-W. Ho, T.-H. Wu, T.-W. Hsu, J.-C. Huanc, C.-C. Huang, and T.-Y. Chiang . 2011. Development of 12 genic microsatellite loci for a biofuel grass, Miscanthus sinensis (Poaceae). American Journal of Botany 98: e201–e203. Google Scholar

7.

K-H. Hung , T.-Y. Chiang , C.-T. Chiu , T.-W. Hsu , and C.-W. Ho . 2009. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from a potential biofuel plant Miscanthus sinensis (Poaceae). Conservation Genetics 10: 1377–1380. Google Scholar

8.

F. Rousset 2008. GenePop′007: A complete re-implementation of the GenePop software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 103–106. Google Scholar

9.

M. Schuelke 2000. An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nature Biotechnology 18: 233–234. Google Scholar

10.

H. Zhao , J. Yu , F. M. You , M. Luo , and J. Peng . 2011. Transferability of microsatellite markers from Brachypodium distachyon to Miscanthus sinensis, a potential biomass crop. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 53: 232–245. Google Scholar

11.

H.-F. Zhou, S.-S. Li, and S. Ge . 2011. Development of microsatellite markers for Miscanthus sinensis (Poaceae) and cross-amplification in other related species. American Journal of Botany 98: e195–e197. Google Scholar

Notes

[1] The authors thank Hai-Qin Sun, Wen-Li Chen, and Zhao-Shan Wang for their help in sample collection and molecular techniques. This study was supported by a grant from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZCX2YW-034) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91131902).

Hai-Fei Zhou, Shan-Shan Li, and Song Ge "Isolation and Characterization of Microsatellite Loci for a Bioenergy Grass, Miscanthus sacchariflorus (Poaceae)," Applications in Plant Sciences 1(1), (2 January 2013). https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1200210
Received: 25 April 2012; Accepted: 1 June 2012; Published: 2 January 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top