Translator Disclaimer
6 February 2014 Isolation and Characterization of Microsatellite Loci from Amur Honeysuckle, Lonicera maackii (Caprifoliaceae)
Author Affiliations +

Amur honeysuckle, Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Maxim. (Caprifoliaceae), is a large, upright shrub native to the Russian Far East, China, Korea, and Japan; it was first introduced into the United States in 1898 and is currently one of the most problematic invasive shrubs in forests of the eastern United States (Luken and Thieret, 1996). Additional introductions from Asian populations and accessions from European botanical gardens were made by the U.S. Department of Agriculture at least 14 times over the following 86 yr (Luken and Thieret, 1996). The Soil Conservation Service developed and promoted cultivars for wildlife habitat and food, screens, and wind barriers (Sharp and Belcher, 1981; Luken and Thieret, 1996), and these cultivars have been widely used in horticulture. Naturalized populations were first described in the late 1950s and now occur in Ontario and nearly every U.S. state east of the Mississippi (Hutchinson and Vankat, 1997).

Several studies indicate that native forest stands where L. maackii has invaded have lower species richness and lower seedling and sapling density in both herbs and trees, lower tree basal area growth (Hutchinson and Vankat, 1997), reduced survival and seed production of forest annuals (Gould and Gorchov, 2000), reduced growth and reproduction of perennials (Miller and Gorchov, 2004), and lower survival of tree seedlings (Gorchov and Trisel, 2003). Despite the negative impacts of L. maackii on native plants in invaded forests, little is known about its dispersal patterns and range expansion. The study of its genetic structure could provide insight to determine whether invasions progress through long-distance dispersal events followed by local expansion. Here, we describe 11 polymorphic microsatellite loci developed to study the genetic structure of L. maackii.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Leaf tissue collection Leaf samples of L. maackii were collected from four to 31 plants from 10 different woodlots in Darke, Preble, and Butler counties, Ohio. Leaf tissue was collected on dry ice prior to storage at −40°C until DNA extraction. Total genomic DNA was extracted from leaves of each honeysuckle plant using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol described by Doyle and Doyle (1987).

Development of microsatellite markers The microsatellite markers were developed using a modified magnetic bead protocol (Glenn and Schable, 2005). Genomic DNA was digested from a concentrated sample of L. maackii plants using HaeIII/PshA1 restriction enzyme (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA). Two linkers were ligated onto the digested genomic DNA (M28 5′-CTCTTGCTTGAATTCGGACTA-3′ and M29 5′-pTAGTCCGAATTCAAGCAAGAGCACA-3′), and M28 was used as a primer for subsequent PCR. The digested genomic DNA was amplified in multiple PCR reactions and concentrated to gain enough DNA for the following bead hybridization process. Six arbitrary repeat motifs with a biotin label on the 5′ end were chosen as probes for the bead hybridization reactions (TC12, AC12, AAG7, AAC7, GATA6, CATA6). After the hybridization, the selected fragments were isolated from the rest of the genomic DNA using streptavidin-coated magnetic beads to enrich for genomic DNA containing the selected repeats. The repeat-enriched DNA was then ligated into a pGEM-T vector (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) and cloned into electrocompetent E. coli cells. Positive clones were sequenced on an ABI PRISM 377 DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA). Sequences were obtained using universal M13 forward (F) and reverse (R) primers employing ABI PRISM BigDye Terminator sequencing kits (Applied Biosystems). Sequences containing repeat motifs and sufficient flanking sequences were used to design primers with Primer3 software (Rozen and Skaletsky, 2000). All sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1). Twenty primer pairs were screened on 3% agarose gels against 12 samples from different locations to identify polymorphic markers. Of the 20 markers that were initially screened, 11 were determined to be polymorphic and we then obtained these markers with fluorescent dye labels (Table 1). All forward primers were labeled with WellRED fluorescent dyes (D4 or D3; Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, Iowa, USA). Once PCR reactions were optimized, samples from individual plants taken from 10 populations were used to determine the diversity of these loci.

Table 1.

Oligonucleotide primer sequences, repeat motifs, number of alleles, product sizes, and annealing temperatures for each of the 11 microsatellite loci isolated for Lonicera maackii.

t01_01.gif

Voucher specimens of the samples used for the development of these microsatellite loci were deposited in the herbaria at Miami University (MU 284343) and Kent State University (KE 66371). DNA samples are maintained in the first author's laboratory at Kent State University, and can be made available upon request.

PCR amplification and fragment analysisPCR reactions were performed using a PTC-200 thermocycler (MJ Research, Watertown, Massachusetts, USA) in 20-µL solution containing 5 µL of genomic DNA, 10 mM Tris buffer (pH 8.0), 10 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.4 µM primer of each primer, and 1 unit of Taq polymerase (Fermentas International Inc., Burlington, Ontario, Canada). The PCR program used included an initial step of 1 min of denaturation at 94°C; 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 1 min at 72°C; and a final extension cycle of 5 min at 72°C. Genotyping was conducted using capillary electrophoresis on an automated genetic DNA analysis system (CEQ 8800; Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, California, USA). Four microliters of PCR product were mixed with 28 µL of formamide and 0.4 µL of 400-bp DNA size standard (GenomeLab, Beckman Coulter) for capillary electrophoresis. Fragments were identified on the basis of their size and according to their mobility in relation to the size standard using a cubic function.

Table 2.

Geographical coordinates, mean number of alleles (A), mean effective number of alleles per locus (Ae), mean observed heterozygosity (Ho), Nei's mean expected heterozygosity (He), and loci deviating from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) for 10 populations of Lonicera maackii from southwestern Ohio, USA, from 158 individuals taken from seven populations in the first six loci (Maack-Di3, Maack-Di4, Maack-Di19, Maack-Tetra21, Maack-Tetra22, and Maack-Tri11).a

t02_01.gif

Electrophoresis data were collected automatically using the GenomeLab GeXP Genetic Analysis System (Beckman Coulter). Once all of the data scoring was complete, random samples were reamplified and rerun to assess reproducibility and confirm the scoring and allele sizes.

Genetic data analysisGenetic diversity was quantified for all loci by the mean number of alleles per locus (A), the effective number of alleles per locus (Ae), observed heterozygosity (Ho), and Nei's expected heterozygosity (He) for each locus and averaged across all loci using the program POPGENE 1.31 (Yeh et al., 1999). All loci examined were polymorphic across all populations, and showed high levels of allelic diversity. A total of 73 and 32 different alleles were found for the first six and second five loci, respectively. The average A in each L. maackii population averaged 7.07 and 6.27 (Tables 2, 3). Average Ae was lower than A across all populations (Ae = 4.41 and Ae = 3.78). Ho and He were also high across all populations. F-statistics indicate that these populations have low levels of inbreeding (mean fixation index [FIS] = 0.0183). Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed that 92% of the variation arises from within-population differences. Geographic coordinates for all woodlots where the samples were collected are given in Tables 2 and 3.

Table 3.

Geographical coordinates, mean number of alleles (A), mean effective number of alleles per locus (Ae), mean observed heterozygosity (Ho), Nei's mean expected heterozygosity (He), and loci deviating from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) for 10 populations of Lonicera maackii from southwestern Ohio, USA, from 68 individuals taken from three populations in the remaining five loci (Maack-Tri1, Maack-Tri11, Maack-Tetra20, Maack-Dil, and Maack-Di5).a

t03_01.gif

Deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and linkage disequilibrium were determined using POPGENE 1.31. Our analyses revealed significant deviations from HWE in eight of the 10 populations for at least one locus (Tables 2, 3). Given that these populations were recently established and most likely received seeds from multiple nearby invaded woodlots, it is reasonable to expect that they will not be in equilibrium. Moreover, we also found linkage disequilibrium for multiple paired comparisons in many populations, but it is difficult to make inferences about linkage disequilibrium given the deviations from HWE observed in these populations. Furthermore, we found that pairs of loci showing linkage disequilibrium were not consistent across populations. These loci should now be tested with samples from parent–offspring pairs to ensure that these markers behave as expected.

CONCLUSIONS

The results described here allow preliminary inferences about the genetic structure of the invasive shrub L. maackii using newly developed microsatellite markers. Our results show high levels of genetic diversity among populations in southwestern Ohio. The high levels of heterozygosity and low FIS values observed in these populations indicate that there is little inbreeding, suggesting that this species is predominantly an outcrosser. Moreover, a significant proportion of the genetic diversity (8%) was found among populations, a level of genetic differentiation consistent with the range observed for short-lived perennials (Hamrick and Godt, 1990). These findings indicate that these microsatellite markers are a useful tool to elucidate the genetic structure and dispersal patterns of L. maackii in its invasive range.

LITERATURE CITED

1.

J. J. Doyle , and J. L. Doyle . 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11–15. Google Scholar

2.

T. C. Glenn , and N. A. Schable . 2005. Isolating microsatellite DNA loci. In E. A. Zimmer and E. H. Roalson [eds.], Methods in enzymology, vol. 395: Molecular evolution: Producing the biochemical data, Part B, 202–222. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA. Google Scholar

3.

D. L. Gorchov , and D. E. Trisel . 2003. Competitive effects of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Herder (Caprifoliaceae), on the growth and survival of native tree seedlings. Plant Ecology 166: 13–24. Google Scholar

4.

A. Gould , and D. L. Gorchov . 2000. Effects of the exotic invasive shrub Lonicera maackii on the survival and fecundity of three species of native annuals. American Midland Naturalist 144: 36–50. Google Scholar

5.

J. L. Hamrick , and M. J. W. Godt . 1990. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In : A. H. D. Brown , M. T. Clegg , A. L. Kahler , and B. S. Weir [eds.], Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources, 43–63. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA. Google Scholar

6.

T. F. Hutchinson , and J. L. Vankat . 1997. Invasibility and effects of Amur honeysuckle in southwestern Ohio forests. Conservation Biology 11: 1117–1124. Google Scholar

7.

J. O. Luken , and J. W. Thieret . 1996. Amur honeysuckle, its fall from grace. Bioscience 46: 18–24. Google Scholar

8.

K. E. Miller , and D. L. Gorchov . 2004. The invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii, reduces growth and fecundity of perennial forest herbs. Oecologia 139: 359–375. Google Scholar

9.

S. Rozen , and H. Skaletsky . 2000. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In S. Misener and S. A. Krawetz [eds.], Methods in molecular biology, vol. 132: Bioinformatics methods and protocols, 365–386. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, USA. Google Scholar

10.

W. C. Sharp , and C. R. Belcher . 1981. “Rem-Red” honeysuckle: A multipurpose landscape shrub. American Nurseryman 153: 94–95. Google Scholar

11.

B. S. Weir 1996. Genetic data analysis II. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA. Google Scholar

12.

F. C. Yeh , R. C. Yang , and T. Boyle . 1999. POPGENE version 1.31: Microsoft Windows–based freeware for population genetic analysis. Quick user guide. Center for International Forestry Research, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Google Scholar

Notes

[1] The authors thank the associate editor and the reviewing editor for advice, comments, and/or criticisms on a previous version of this manuscript. This research was funded by a United States Department of Agriculture, Cooperative State Research Education and Extension Service, National Research Initiative Competitive Grant (no. 2007-35320-18349 to David Gorchov, Mary Henry, and O.J.R.).

Oscar J. Rocha, Erin McNutt, and Kelly Barriball "Isolation and Characterization of Microsatellite Loci from Amur Honeysuckle, Lonicera maackii (Caprifoliaceae)," Applications in Plant Sciences 2(2), (6 February 2014). https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1300030
Received: 18 April 2013; Accepted: 1 October 2013; Published: 6 February 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top