Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2016 Development of Microsatellite Markers for Fargesia denudata (Poaceae), the Staple-Food Bamboo of the Giant Panda
Author Affiliations +

The giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) is a flagship species in nature conservation (Swaisgood et al., 2010). One of its biological and behavioral characteristics is a highly restricted diet, consisting mainly of bamboo (Christian et al., 2015). The most important bamboo species for the giant panda's diet is Fargesia denudata T. P. Yi (Poaceae), which is endemic to China (Zeng et al., 2002). Fargesia denudata has four growth stages for aboveground parts: the slow growth stage, the exponential stage, the relative growth decreasing stage, and the dormant stage. The fastest growth stage is the exponential stage, which contributes 92% of the annual biomass production and has a maximum daily height growth increment of up to 6.1 cm (Wang et al., 1991). In spring, the most active part of F. denudata grows underground, where basal buds germinate. Fargesia denudata mainly occurs in Wanglang National Nature Reserve (WNNR), one of four main reserves established to protect the giant panda, other rare wild animals, and their habitats ( http://www.wanglang.com/), located in the northern part of Piugwu County, Sichuan Province, China (32°49′−33°02′N, 103°50′−1047deg;58′E) (Li and Shen, 2012). However, F. denudata died across a large area after flowering in the 1970s, seriously threatening the giant panda's survival (Qin, 1985). Furthermore, despite its ecological significance there have been no genetic studies of F. denudata, mainly due to a lack of appropriate species-specific molecular markers. Thus, we have developed 16 microsatellite markers for F. denudata using next-generation sequencing technology and evaluated their transferability to five other related species.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Genomic DNA was extracted from silica gel–dried leaves of F. denudata, sampled in WNNR, using a DNAquick Plant System following the manufacturer's protocol (TIANGEN, Beijing, China). Vouchers were deposited at Beijing Forestry University (Appendix 1). A 500-ng portion of purified genomic DNA product was used for library construction, via a 126-bp paired-end run on a HiSeq 1500 system (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA), part of the sequencing platform of the School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, China. Briefly, the manufacturer's instructions to obtain 400-bp inserts were followed, using RTA version 1.6 (Illumina) for base-calling and in-house Perl scripts to remove weak signals and low-quality sequences (Du et al., 2015). Read ends were further screened and trimmed used DynamicTrim.pl and LengthSort.pl in SolexaQA (Cox et al., 2010). In total, 1.6 GB of raw data were obtained and 2,992,449 reads were accepted after removing reads with a base error rate >0.1% and/or <50 bp long. De novo sequence assembly by SOAPdenovo2 (Luo et al., 2012) cannot provide enough contiguity for further analysis, thus we switched to reference-guided assembly (RGA) using the draft genome of Phyllostachys heterocycla (Carrière) S. Matsum. cv. Pubescens as the reference genome. We obtained 424,321 contigs, of which the longest contig is 2454 bp and 125 contigs had a length >1 Kb. Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were detected using the MIcroSAtellite identification tool (MISA; Thiel et al., 2003). We searched for mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide repeats, with repeat counts >10 for mononucleotides and ≥6 for the other repeats, and interruption (max_difference_for_2_SSRs) of 100 bp. We found 182 microsatellites meeting these criteria ( Appendix S1 (apps.1600005_s1.docx)) and developed primer pairs in flanking regions using Primer 3 (Rozen and Skaletsky, 1999) for all of the identified SSRs with annealing temperatures ranging from 50°C to 58°C and fragment sizes from 100 to 300 bp.

We randomly selected 70 di- and trinucleotide microsatellites from these pairs for further validation in four individuals randomly selected from four populations (one individual from each population). For primary microsatellite screening, PCR was performed in a 25-µL reaction volume containing 1× Taq buffer, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 10–20 ng template DNA, 1.6 pM of forward and reverse primer each, and 1 unit Taq polymerase (Aidlab Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Conditions of the PCR were: 94°C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 56°C for 45 s, 72°C for 45 s; and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. Five microliters of the PCR products were separated on 2% agarose gels to check for successful amplification. Forty-two of the 70 microsatellites were successfully amplified, and the presence of repeated motifs in 16 of them was confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Table 1). All of the confirmed microsatellite sequences were deposited at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI; accession no. KU043295–KU043310) (Table 1).

DNA samples from 72 individuals of four populations were used to test the polymorphism of the 16 markers using a rapid and inexpensive method based on the M13-tail technique (Schuelke, 2000; Du et al., 2013). Briefly, a 5′ M13-tailed forward primer, a reverse primer, and a fluorescent-labeled M13 primer were synthesized for each genotyping run and the M13 primers were labeled with FAM, HEX, ROX, and TAMRA (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China), respectively. Each 15-µL PCR contained 5–20 ng template DNA, 1× Taq mix (Aidlab Biotechnologies Co., Ltd.), 2.4 pM of the reverse and fluorescent-labeled M13 primers, and 0.6 pM of the forward primer. The PCR conditions were: 94°C for 5 min; then 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 56°C for 45 s, 72°C for 45 s; followed by eight cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 53°C for 45 s, 72°C for 45 s; and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. For each PCR product with the four different fluorescent dyes, 0.5 µL were mixed and added to 10 µL of formamide and 0.5 µL of GeneScan 500 LIZ Size Standard (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) and run on an ABI PRISM 3730 Genetic Analyzer. Raw data were analyzed with GeneMarker version 1.75 (SoftGenetics, State College, Pennsylvania, USA).

Table 1.

Characteristics of 16 microsatellite loci developed for Fargesia denudata.

t01_01.gif

The total number of alleles, observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity (He), and χ2 probabilities of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) for 14 of the loci found to be polymorphic were determined using GenAlEx 6.41 (Peakall and Smouse, 2006). The number of alleles ranged from two to 19 per locus, Ho from 0 to 1, He from 0 to 0.87, and the χ2 tests revealed that three loci (FAD012, FAD018, and FAD049) were not in HWE (Table 2), mainly because of clonal propagation. No linkage disequilibrium was detected in these loci by GENEPOP 4.2 (Rousset, 2008).

We chose five bamboo species (Arundinaria fargesii E. G. Camus, Yushania lineolata T. P. Yi, Fargesia scabrida T. P. Yi, F. rufa T. P. Yi, and F. ferax (Keng) T. P. Yi) to test the transferability of the 16 markers. Vouchers were deposited at Beijing Forestry University (Appendix 1). DNA of five individuals from each of these species was subjected to PCR amplification using the 16 novel microsatellite primers identified in F. denudata, and PCR products were separated by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis followed by GoldView staining. The overall transferability of the 16 microsatellite markers proved to be 95.50%, ranging from 90.00% for Y. lineolata to 98.75% for F. rufa and F. ferax (Table 3).

CONCLUSIONS

The novel microsatellite markers developed in this study will be useful for exploring the genetic status of F. denudata, the giant panda's staple-food bamboo, as well as other related bamboo species. Moreover, analysis of the genetic dynamics in key areas using these polymorphic markers should assist efforts to conserve important bamboo populations in the giant panda's habitat.

Table 2.

Fourteen polymorphic microsatellite locus–specific measures of genetic diversity across four populations of Fargesia denudata.a

t02_01.gif

Table 3.

Transferability of the 16 novel microsatellite markers across five related Arundinarieae species (Poaceae).

t02_01.gif

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant no. 2015ZCQ-LX-03), National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 41201051, 41430749), and the Beijing Nova Program (grant no. Z151100000315056) to F.K.D.

LITERATURE CITED

1.

Christian, A. L., K. K. Knott, C. K. Vance, J. F. Falcone, L. L. Bauer, G. C. Fahey Jr ., S. Willard, and A. J. Kouba. 2015. Nutrient and mineral composition during shoot growth in seven species of Phyllostachys and Pseudosasa bamboo consumed by giant panda. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 99: 1172–1183. Google Scholar

2.

Cox, M. P., D. A. Peterson, and P. J. Biggs. 2010. SolexaQA: At-a-glance quality assessment of Illumina second-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 485. Google Scholar

3.

Du, F. K., F. Xu, H. Qu, S. Feng, J. Tang, and R. Wu. 2013. Exploiting the transcriptome of Euphrates poplar, Populus euphratica (Salicaceae) to develop and characterize new EST-SSR markers and construct an EST-SSR database. PLoS ONE 8: e61337. Google Scholar

4.

Du, F. K., T. Lang, S. Lu, Y. Wang, J. Li, and K. Yin. 2015. An improved method for chloroplast genome sequencing in non-model forest tree species. Tree Genetics & Genomes 11: 114. Google Scholar

5.

Li, J. Q., and G. Z. Shen. 2012. The habitat of giant pandas. Higher Education Press, Beijing, China. Google Scholar

6.

Luo, R., B. Liu, Y. Xie, Z. Li, W. Huang, J. Yuan, G. He, et al. 2012. SOAPdenovo2: An empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. GigaScience 1:18. Google Scholar

7.

Peakall, R., and P. E. Smouse. 2006. GenAlEx 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288–295. Google Scholar

8.

Qin, Z. 1985. Giant pandas found resources in Sichuan China and the regeneration of the bamboo groves. Journal of Bamboo Research 4: 1–10. Google Scholar

9.

Rousset, F. 2008. GENE POP'007: A complete reimplementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 103–106. Google Scholar

10.

Rozen, S., and H. Skaletsky. 1999. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In S. Misener and S. A. Krawetz [eds.], Methods in molecular biology, vol. 132: Bioinformatics methods and protocols, 365–386. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, USA.  Google Scholar

11.

Schuelke, M. 2000. An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nature Biotechnology 18: 233–234. Google Scholar

12.

Swaisgood, R. R., F. Wei, D. E. Wildt, A. J. Kouba, and Z. Zhang. 2010. Giant panda conservation science: How far we have come? Biology Letters 6: 143–145. Google Scholar

13.

Thiel, T., W. R. Michalek, K. Varshney, and A. Graner. 2003. Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 10: 411–422. Google Scholar

14.

Wang, J. X., Z. G. Ma, C. X. Liu, and L. M. Gan. 1991. Preliminary study on the growth and development rules of Fargesia denudata bamboo. Journal of Bamboo Research 10: 38–48. Google Scholar

15.

Zeng, Z. Y., B. S. Yue, J. H. Ran, S. Y. Liu, Y. P. Chen, and S. W. Jiang. 2002. Panda's exploitation of habitats at Wanglang Nature Reserve. Journal of Sichuan University (Natural Science Edition) 39:1140–1144. Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix 1.

Geographic locations and voucher information for specimens used in this study.

tA01_01.gif
Yan Lv, Tao Yu, Sihai Lu, Cheng Tian, Junqing Li, and Fang K. Du "Development of Microsatellite Markers for Fargesia denudata (Poaceae), the Staple-Food Bamboo of the Giant Panda," Applications in Plant Sciences 4(6), (1 June 2016). https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1600005
Received: 11 January 2016; Accepted: 1 February 2016; Published: 1 June 2016
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top