Translator Disclaimer
19 September 2016 Characterization of Microsatellite Loci in the Lichen-Forming Fungus Cetraria aculeata (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota)
Author Affiliations +

In lichens, microsatellite markers have been reported for a number of species and were successfully applied to assess levels of genetic diversity and dispersal patterns (e.g., Walser et al., 2005; Jones et al., 2015). In this paper, we develop microsatellite primers for the lichen species Cetraria aculeata (Schreb.) Fr. (Parmeliaceae), a dark brown, fruticose soil lichen characterized by an extremely wide distributional range and ecological niche, which makes it a good model organism to study the impact of environmental factors on population genetic structure and diversity. The species originated in the Northern Hemisphere and dispersed through South America into the Antarctic during the Pleistocene (Fernández-Mendoza and Printzen, 2013), establishing one of its centers of diversity in the Mediterranean region (Fernández-Mendoza et al., 2011; Printzen et al., 2013). Mediterranean haplotypes of C. aculeata mycobionts are similar to those from the Afro-alpine mountain ranges (Lutsak et al., 2015), while central and northern European haplotypes differ more strongly (Fernández-Mendoza et al., 2011). The fine-scale structure of both symbionts is not sufficiently resolved by DNA sequence data. Therefore, microsatellite markers are of high importance to study the phylogeographic structure and genetic diversity of C. aculeata across western Eurasia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Total genomic DNA was extracted from one thallus of C. aculeata (isolate 3041, Ukrainian Nature Steppe Reserve, FR-0261072) in four single reactions with the DNeasy 96 Plant Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). The samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen, ground, and incubated overnight at 37°C in a mixture of enzymes: 400 µL of Glusulase (PerkinElmer, Boston, Massachusetts, USA) and 500 µL of 0.1 mg mL-1 Zymolyase 20T (Seikagaku Biobusiness, Tokyo, Japan) in 500 µL of phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The DNA extracts were pooled, and libraries for the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq sequencing platforms were created. A total of 25,727,973 paired-end reads with an average length of 100 bp and 15,120,929 paired-end reads with an average length of 250 bp were obtained from the HiSeq and MiSeq runs, respectively. Illumina adapters and primers were trimmed and quality filtering was performed using Trimmomatic software version 0.27 (Bolger et al., 2014). The lichen metagenome was assembled using Velvet software version 1.2.10 (Zerbino and Birney, 2008). Using the BLAST tool v2.2.25+, algal and bacterial contigs were filtered out. The latest available National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nucleotide database (NT Database, 24 May 2013) was used for aligning the assembled contigs. The alignment file was processed by using MEGAN5 version 4.70.4 software under default settings (Huson et al., 2007). Plots generated by MEGAN were used for assessing the bacterial, fungal, and algal contigs, which served as a reference for mapping the raw reads in the second round of genome assembly. The inferred contigs were screened for tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide repeats with at least five repeats using the MIcroSAtellite identification tool (MISA; Thiel et al., 2003;  http://pgrc.ipk-gatersleben.de/misa/misa.html). We selected 40 loci with perfect (uninterrupted) microsatellites and a repeat size of four to six base pairs for testing. Primers were designed using the Primer3 plugin in Geneious R7.1.9 (created by BioMatters,  http://www.geneious.com/).

Table 1.

Overview of the microsatellite loci developed for the mycobiont of Cetraria aculeata.

t01_01.gif

On a subset of eight specimens of C. aculeata, 24 primer pairs amplified successfully and showed significant variability. Single PCR reactions were performed using illustra PuReTaq Ready-To-Go PCR Beads (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, England) according to the manufacturer's protocol with the following conditions: denaturation for 5 min at 95°C; followed by 10 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 65–57°C (touchdown of −1° per cycle), and 1 min at 72°C; followed by 20 cycles of 1 min at 94°C and 1 min at 54, 53, or 52°C (depending on primer pair); and a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. The 24 primer pairs were also tested in PCR reactions with three axenic cultures of Trebouxia jamesii (Hildreth & Ahmadjian) Gärtner, a photobiont of C. aculeata, isolated from specimens from Antarctica, Spain, and Germany. Eight primer pairs produced PCR products with at least one of the cultures and were discarded. The remaining 16 primer pairs were assumed to be fungal specific. Forward primers were labeled with fluorescent dyes and used in multiplex PCRs with the Type-It Multiplex Kit (QIAGEN). PCR reactions were performed in a total volume of 25 µL, which contained 12.5 µL of Type-It Multiplex PCR Master Mix, 2.5 µL of primer mix, 5 µL of RNA-free water, and 5 µL of sample DNA. The PCR conditions were set to: denaturation for 5 min at 95°C; followed by five cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 90 s at 57°C, and 30 s at 72°C; then 15 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 90 s at 55°C, and 30 s at 72°C; then 10 cycles of 30 sat 95°C, 90 s at 54°C, and 30 s at 72°C; and 10 cycles of 30 sat 95°C, 90 s at 53°C, and 30 s at 72°C; with a final extension of 30 min at 60°C. One more primer pair was eliminated, as it yielded products of inconsistent size.

Table 2.

Characteristics of microsatellite loci CA01–CA10 in populations of Cetraria aculeata from Spain.a

t02_01.gif

Table 3.

Cross-amplification of Cetraria aculeata microsatellite markers with related species of the genus Cetraria.

t03_01.gif

A data set of 81 specimens of C. aculeata was used to test the amplification rates and the variability of selected microsatellite loci. The data set consisted of four populations of 10 to 24 individuals collected in Spain (Appendix 1). Sequences and primers were submitted to GenBank (Table 1). Alleles were sized using GeneMarker version 1.90 (SoftGenetics, State College, Pennsylvania, USA). The variability of the microsatellite loci was measured by counting the number of alleles and calculating Nei's unbiased gene diversity using GenAlEx 6.5 (Peakall and Smouse, 2012).

The microsatellite markers CA01–CA09 showed an amplification rate of 100%. CA10 amplified in 85% of the samples (Table 1). Tetranucleotide microsatellites (six out of 10) were the most common microsatellite motif. The microsatellite loci showed between four (CA05) and 13 (CA06) alleles per locus, with a mean of 7.9 and average gene diversities between 0.40 and 0.73 across four populations (Table 2). The other five markers (CA11–CA15) were not considered for the statistical analysis due to lower amplification rates. The primers developed were also tested for cross-species amplification with specimens of C. muricata (Ach.) Eckfeldt, C. crespoae (Barreno & Vázquez) Kärnefelt, C. odontella (Ach.) Ach., C. australiensis W. A. Weber ex Kärnefelt, and the still undescribed C. “panamericana” (listed in Appendix 1). The polymorphic markers CA01–CA10 successfully amplified in all the species, except for locus CA05 in C. australiensis and C. “panamericana,” and locus CA10 in C. australiensis (Table 3). Linkage disequilibrium in pairwise combinations of the loci within populations and across the total sample was tested using GENEPOP 4.2 (Raymond and Rousset, 1995). Holm-Bonferroni sequential correction of P values (Holm, 1979) using the implementation by Gaetano (2013) and a significance threshold of 0.05 resulted in nine significant deviations from linkage equilibrium out of 45 pairwise comparisons across all populations. The deviations involved all loci except CA06 and CA10. Only five out of 171 pairwise comparisons within populations showed significant deviation from linkage equilibrium. These deviations are more likely explained by the predominantly clonal reproduction of C. aculeata or population structure than by physical linkage of microsatellite loci.

CONCLUSIONS

The microsatellite markers developed here will facilitate the studies of genetic diversity and population structure of C. aculeata along geographic and bioclimatic gradients. These studies will increase our understanding of dispersal patterns and local adaptation in lichens. The fact that primers amplify across a broader range of species may also contribute to a better understanding of species boundaries and speciation within the genus.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study received financial support from the Adolf Messer-Stiftung, the Marga und Kurt Möllgaard-Stiftung, and the research funding program Landes-Offensive zur Entwicklung wissenschaftlich-ökonomischer Exzellenz (LOEWE) of Hesse's Ministry of Higher Education, Research and the Arts. The work of T.L. is supported by a grant from the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).

LITERATURE CITED

1.

Bolger, A. M., M. Lohse, and B. Usadel. 2014. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 30: 2114–2120. Google Scholar

2.

Fernández-Mendoza, F., S. Domaschke, M. A. García, P. Jordan, M. P. Martín, and C. Printzen. 2011. Population structure of mycobionts and photobionts of the widespread lichen Cetraria aculeata. Molecular Ecology 20: 1208–1232. Google Scholar

3.

Fernández-Mendoza, F., and C. Printzen. 2013. Pleistocene expansion of the bipolar lichen Cetraria aculeata into the Southern hemisphere. Molecular Ecology 22: 1961–1983. Google Scholar

4.

Gaetano, J. 2013. Holm-Bonferroni sequential correction: An Excel calculator (1.2). Website  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242331583_Holm-Bonferroni_Sequential_Correction_An_EXCEL_Calculator_-_Ver._1.2 [accessed 25 August 2016]. Google Scholar

5.

Holm, S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6: 65–70. Google Scholar

6.

Huson, D., A. Auch, J. Qi. and S. Schuster. 2007. MEGAN analysis of metagenome data. Genome Research 17: 377–386. Google Scholar

7.

Jones, T. C., I. D. Hogg, R. J. Wilkins, and T. G. Green. 2015. Microsatellite analyses of the Antarctic endemic lichen Buellia frigida Darb. (Physciaceae) suggest limited dispersal and the presence of glacial refugia in the Ross Sea region. Polar Biology 38: 941–949. Google Scholar

8.

Lutsak, T., F. Fernández-Mendoza, P. Kirika, M. Wondafrash, and C. Printzen. 2015. Mycobiont-photobiont interactions of the lichen Cetraria aculeata in high alpine regions of East Africa and South America. Symbiosis 68: 25–37. Google Scholar

9.

Peakall, R., and P. Smouse. 2012. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 28: 2537–2539. Google Scholar

10.

Printzen, C., S. Domaschke, F. Fernández-Mendoza, and S. Pérez-Ortega. 2013. Biogeography and ecology of Cetraria aculeata, a widely distributed lichen with a bipolar distribution. MycoKeys 6: 33–53. Google Scholar

11.

Raymond, M., and F. Rousset. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248–249. Google Scholar

12.

Thiel, T., W. Michalek, R. K. Varshney, and A. Graner. 2003. Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 10: 411–422. Google Scholar

13.

Walser, J. C., R. Holderegger, F. Gugerli, S. E. Hoebee, and C. Scheidegger. 2005. Microsatellites reveal regional population differentiation and isolation in Lobaria pulmonaria, an epiphytic lichen. Molecular Ecology 14: 457–467. Google Scholar

14.

Zerbino, D. R., and E. Birney. 2008. Velvet: Algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Research 18: 821–829. Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix 1.

Localities and collection data for Cetraria species used in this study.

tA01_01.gif
Tetiana Lutsak, Fernando Fernández-Mendoza, Bastian Greshake, Francesco Dal Grande, Ingo Ebersberger, Sieglinde Ott, and Christian Printzen "Characterization of Microsatellite Loci in the Lichen-Forming Fungus Cetraria aculeata (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota)," Applications in Plant Sciences 4(9), (19 September 2016). https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1600047
Received: 13 April 2016; Accepted: 1 June 2016; Published: 19 September 2016
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top