Translator Disclaimer
12 May 2017 Fifteen Microsatellite Markers for Herbertia zebrina (Iridaceae): An Endangered Species from South American Grasslands
Author Affiliations +

Herbertia zebrina Deble (Iridaceae) is a critically endangered species of the southern Brazilian grasslands with a range of <100 km2, high fragmentation, and declining habitat quality (International Union for Conservation of Nature [IUCN] criterion B1ab[iii,v]). The populations are restricted to a mountainous region with granitic soils, and it was recognized as a distinct species only recently (Deble, 2010). Information on distribution, number of populations, and reproduction of H. zebrina is sparse (C. Forgiarini, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, unpublished manuscript). All known populations are located within an area that has changed substantially during the past 10 years and is severely threatened by monocultures (Roesch et al., 2009). The genus Herbertia Sweet is of recent origin (Goldblatt et al., 2008), and its radiation was probably linked to pollinator shifts that occur frequently in Iridaceae (Chauveau et al., 2012). Most Herbertia species, with the exception of the widespread H. lahue (Molina) Goldblatt, are restricted to South American grasslands. Herbertia zebrina is thus a suitable model to understand the mechanisms that lead to the high level of endemism in that region, and to study the effects of land-use changes threatening this diversity.

Microsatellite markers (simple sequence repeats [SSRs]) are a well-established approach to evaluate genetic diversity of populations for conservation planning of threatened species (Wan et al., 2014). Thus, we developed markers for H. zebrina using two methods of microsatellite development. In the future, we expect that these markers can be used to analyze the genetic structure of the species. We also present the conditions for amplification, primer sequences, size range, heterozygosity, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE), null alleles, and linkage disequilibrium. To evaluate the applicability of these markers, cross-amplification was tested for the congeneric species H. darwinii Roitman & J. A. Castillo and for a species of another closely related genus, Calydorea crocoides Ravenna.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Total genomic DNA was extracted from silica gel–dried leaves of 50 individuals from three populations of H. zebrina (Appendix 1) using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol developed by Doyle and Doyle (1987), with modifications to the quantity of dried leaves used (10–50 mg) and microcentrifuge tube size (2-mL tubes). Two types of libraries were prepared, one using the method of Billote et al. (1999) and another using two partial (2%) Illumina MiSeq paired-end runs with read length of 300 bp (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA). For the first library, 20 primer pairs were designed from a single individual (voucher no. ESC421, Herbarium of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul [ICN], Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; Appendix 1). Total DNA was digested with RsaI (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) and ligated to the adapters M28 (5′-CTCTTGCTTGAATTCGGACTA-3′) and M29 (5′-TAGTCCGAATTCAAGCAAGAGCACA-3′) using T4 DNA ligase. Linker-adapted fragments were then enriched by hybridization with 5′ biotin (GT)8 and (CT)8 biotin-linked probes followed by purification with paramagnetic beads (Streptavidin MagneSphere Paramagnetic Particles; Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). After the process described above, the enriched genomic DNA fragments were cloned into plasmid (pGEM-T Easy Vector, Promega Corporation) and single colonies containing microsatellite markers were identified by dot blot hybridization. Inserts were amplified with universal primer M13, treated with exonuclease I and shrimp alkaline phosphatase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA), and sequenced using the ABI 3500xL sequencer (Life Technologies/Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA). Primers were designed using Primer3 (Untergasser et al., 2012), according to the following criteria: (i) size of primers 18–22 bp, (ii) melting temperature (Tm) 45–60°C, (iii) Tm difference between primer pairs no higher than 3°C, (iv) GC content 40–60%, (v) no complementarity between primer pairs, and (vi) amplified product length 100–300 bp.

To increase the number of polymorphic loci, we also used one sample of H. zebrina (voucher no. CF115 [ICN]; Appendix 1) to construct an Illumina library and identify microsatellites, from which 27 primer pairs resulted. The library was sequenced twice on a MiSeq run in five steps: DNA fragmentation, end repair, dA-tailing, Y-adapter ligation, and index PCR and bioinformatics analyses according to Deck et al. (2016). This process was developed at the Institute for Integrative Nature Conservation Research, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (Vienna). The Illumina run was done by the Genomics Service Unit from Ludwig-Maximilians-University (Munich). Primers were designed using Primer3Plus (Untergasser et al., 2007). Fluorescent dyes were added to the primers using the M13-tailed primer method (Schuelke, 2000). Four tail primers were used, and each one was tagged with a unique fluorescent dye: 6-FAM (TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT), VIC (TAATACGACTCACTATAGGG), NED (TTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTG), and PET (GATAACAATTTCACACAGG). The amplifications were done by multiplex, with a combination of two to four primers using HotStarTaq Plus Master Mix Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), following the protocol described in Deck et al. (2016).

Table 1.

Characteristics of 12 polymorphic and three monomorphic loci designed for Herbertia zebrina.

t01_01.gif

The conditions of PCR amplification were identical in both techniques, i.e., an initial denaturation at 95°C for 15 min; followed by 10 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, annealing temperature (with a touchdown of 65–60/62–58°C, −0.5°C per cycle) for 45 s, and 72°C for 30 s; 35 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, annealing temperature (58–60°C) for 45 s, and 72°C for 30 s; and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. Of the 47 primer pairs developed from the two libraries, 33 primer pairs resulted in PCR-amplified products, six using the method of Billote et al. (1999) and 27 using Illumina MiSeq. The amplifications were confirmed by gel electrophoresis (1.5%). One microliter of fluorescent PCR product was added into the mixture with 11 µL of formamide and 0.11 µL of GeneScan 500 LIZ Size Standard (Applied Biosystems/Life Technologies, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). The material was sent to the Genomics Service Unit (Ludwig-Maximilians-University) for genotyping. The genotypes were analyzed using the program GeneMarker 1.75 (SoftGenetics, State College, Pennsylvania, USA). Of the 33 markers, 12 were considered polymorphic, three monomorphic (Table 1), and 18 presented poor amplification and were not included here.

To estimate the number of alleles, observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity (He), and HWE, we used the package pegas (Paradis, 2010) of R software version 3.2.2 (R Development Core Team, 2016). The presence of null alleles was checked using MICRO-CHECKER 2.2.3 (van Oosterhout et al., 2004), and their statistical significance was assessed using Bonferroni-corrected P values. Linkage disequilibrium was estimated using GENEPOP software version 4.2 (Rousset, 2008). The number of alleles ranged from two to 14 per locus across the three populations (Table 2), Ho was 0.00–0.95, and He was 0.18–0.89. Overall, Ho was lower than He in the three populations, resulting in deviations from HWE for most markers. Null alleles were observed in nine loci (Table 2). Significant linkage disequilibrium was not detected after Bonferroni correction. Tests of cross-amplification using the same amplification conditions as for H. zebrina with the 12 polymorphic markers showed that nine of them amplified for H. darwinii and five for C. crocoides (Table 3).

Table 2.

Genetic characterization of 12 newly developed polymorphic microsatellites of Herbertia zebrina.a

t02_01.gif

CONCLUSIONS

The 15 microsatellites presented here are the first markers developed specifically for H. zebrina. Although three of them were determined to be monomorphic, cross-amplification testing showed that those microsatellites amplified not only for a congeneric species but also for a species in a related genus. Thus, they can be considered reliable markers and also a valuable resource for designing appropriate conservation strategies for this South American grassland species.

Table 3.

Amplification of 12 polymorphic microsatellite loci developed for Herbertia zebrina for one congeneric species and one species from a phylogenetically closely related genus.

t03_01.gif

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank laboratory technician Holger Paetsch for assistance in the molecular laboratory. Financial support was received from Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) (to C.F.), the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq; grant no. 304197/2012-2 to T.T.S.C.), the German Research Foundation (grant no. KO1741/3-1 to J.K.), and the Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção a Natureza (project 1018/20142).

LITERATURE CITED

1.

Billote, N., P. J. L. Lagoda, A. M. Risterucci, and F. C. Baurencs. 1999. Microsatellite enriched libraries: Applied methodology for the development of SSR markers in tropical crops. Fruits 54: 277–288. Google Scholar

2.

Chauveau, O., L. Eggers, T. T. Souza-Chies, and S. Nadot. 2012. Oilproducing flowers within the Iridoideae (Iridaceae): Evolutionary trends in the flowers of the New World genera. Annals of Botany 110: 713–729. Google Scholar

3.

Deble, L. P. 2010. Herbertia zebrina (Iridaceae, Tigridieae, Cipurinae). A new species from Rio Grande do Sul State (Brazil). Darwiniana 48: 93–96. Google Scholar

4.

Deck, L. M. G., J. C. Habel, M. Curto, M. Husemann, S. Sturm, A. Garitano-Zavala, and H. Meimberg. 2016. New microsatellite markers for two sympatric Tinamou species, the Ornate Tinamou (Nothoprocta ornata) and Darwin's Nothura (Nothura darwinii). Avian Biology Research 9: 139–146. Google Scholar

5.

Doyle, J. J., and J. L. Doyle. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11–15. Google Scholar

6.

Goldblatt, P., A. Rodriquez, M. P. Powell, T. J. Davies, J. C. Manning, M. V. D. Bank, and V. Savolainen. 2008. Iridaceae ‘Out of Australasia’? Phylogeny, biogeography, and divergence time based on plastid DNA sequences. Systematic Botany 33: 495–508. Google Scholar

7.

Paradis, E. 2010. pegas: An R package for population genetics with an integrated-modular approach. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 26: 419–420. Google Scholar

8.

R Development Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Version 3.3.2. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Website  https://www.R-project.org [accessed 20 January 2017]. Google Scholar

9.

Roesch, L. F. W., F. C. B. Viera, V. A. Pereira, A. L. Schünemann, I. F. Teixeira, A. J. T. Senna, and V. M. Stefenon. 2009. The Brazilian Pampa: A fragile biome. Diversity (Basel) 1: 182–198. Google Scholar

10.

Rousset, F. 2008. GENEPOP'007: A complete reimplementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 103–106. Google Scholar

11.

Schuelke, M. 2000. An economic method for the fluorescent labelling of PCR fragments. Nature Biotechnology 18: 233–234. Google Scholar

12.

Untergasser, A., H. Nijveen, X. Rao, T. Bisseling, R. Geurts, and J. A. M. Leunissen. 2007. Primer3Plus, an enhanced web interface to Primer3. Nucleic Acids Research 35: W71–W74. Google Scholar

13.

Untergasser, A., I. Cututache, T. Koressaar, J. Ye, B. C. Faircloth, M. Remm, and S. G. Rozen. 2012. Primer3—New capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Research 40: e115. Google Scholar

14.

van Oosterhout, C., W. F. Hutchinson, D. P. M. Willis, and P. F. Shipley. 2004. MICRO-CHECKER Version 2.2.1. Website  http://www.microchecker.hull.ac.uk [accessed January 2017]. Google Scholar

15.

Wan, J., C. Wang, J. Yu, S. Nie, S. Han, Y. Zu, C. Chen, et al. 2014. Model-based conservation planning of the genetic diversity of Phellodendron amurense Rupr due to climate change. Ecology and Evolution 4:2884–2900. Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix 1.

Location information for the populations of Herbertia zebrina, H. darwinii, and Calydorea crocoides used in this study.

tA01_01.gif
Cristiane Forgiarini, Manuel Curto, Eudes Maria Stiehl-Alves, Christian Bräuchler, Johannes Kollmann, Harald Meimberg, and Tatiana Teixeira de Souza-Chies "Fifteen Microsatellite Markers for Herbertia zebrina (Iridaceae): An Endangered Species from South American Grasslands," Applications in Plant Sciences 5(5), (12 May 2017). https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1700035
Received: 14 April 2017; Accepted: 1 April 2017; Published: 12 May 2017
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top