Translator Disclaimer
1 August 2016 Density and Climate Influence Seasonal Population Dynamics in an Arctic Ungulate
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The locally migratory behavior of the high arctic muskox (Ovibos muschatus) is a central component of the breeding and winter survival strategies applied to cope with the highly seasonal arctic climate. However, altered climate regimes affecting plant growth are likely to affect local migration dynamics of the muskox. In this study, we apply long-term local-scale data on the seasonal distribution of muskoxen in the Zackenberg Valley, Northeast Greenland, to assess the degree of climatic influence on local seasonal muskox dynamics. Specifically, we analyze how seasonal climate (temperature, snow cover), forage availability (length of growth season), and the number of adult females available per male (operational sex ratio) influence changes in the seasonal density dependence, abundance, and immigration rate of muskoxen into the valley.

The results suggested summer temperature as the major controlling factor in the seasonal, local-scale migration of muskoxen at Zackenberg. Specifically, higher summer temperatures, defined as the cumulative average daily positive degrees in June, July, and August, resulted in decreased density dependence and, consequently, increase in the seasonal abundance of muskox in the valley. Additionally, a longer growth season was found to increase the seasonal abundance of muskox in the Zackenberg Valley. In contrast, changes in spring snow cover displayed no direct relation to the seasonal immigration rate. Our study suggests that access to high-quality forage is important for the short-term, local scale population dynamics of muskoxen in Northeast Greenland.

Introduction

Populations of muskoxen (Ovibos muschatus) in high arctic Greenland are locally migratory. The animals move inland in autumn and spend winter on high ground where there is generally less snow than on the coastal area where they spend summer (Forchhammer and Boertmann, 1993). They calve inland in March/April and only return to the coast, where there is substantially greater biomass of for-age, after the melt in May/June (Thing et al., 1987). Females, therefore, have to meet the energy demand of early lactation by drawing on energy reserves acquired and stored since the previous summer (White et al., 1989; Kerby and Post, 2013). Additionally, bulls increase energy uptake before the rut in August/September, to meet the additional energy requirements for mating (Forchhammer, 1995). It follows that weather variables such as date of snow melt and summer temperature may influence the nutritional status of the animals in summer and also supply cues for migration to lower altitudes. For instance, Forchhammer et al. (2005) demonstrated that the movement of muskoxen into and out from the Zackenberg Valley, Northeast Greenland, displayed a negative density dependence and suggested that the strength of density dependence might be related to variation in forage biomass. However, as climate changes are gradually advancing spring in the High Arctic (Høye et al., 2007; Mortensen et al., 2014), it is likely that the high arctic muskox populations are experiencing relaxed competition for forage and, hence, earlier immigration cues, as vegetation can be accessed progressively earlier. Finally, females may be regarded as a resource formales during the rut, where, in particular, the operational sex ratio (number of females per male) significantly influences the spatial movement of males (Forchhammer and Boomsma, 1998). Thus, to expand on our current understanding on the muskox population dynamics during spring migrations, we examine the combined effects of variation in climate (temperature, snow cover), forage availability (length of plant growth season), and male access to females (females per male) on the average seasonal values of immigration rate, abundance, and density dependence, respectively, in a high arctic muskox population. Specifically, we predict that earlier snowmelt could induce higher immigration rates, as earlier snowmelt will allow earlier access to food resources, prompting an incentive to be first on-site. Additionally, we expect that the density dependence will be associated with the sex ratio in the valley, as the ratio of females to males decreases, competition among males in the rut will increase (Forchhammer and Boomsma, 1998).

Methods

Study Site and Population

The study area was the Zackenberg Valley (74°30′N, 20°30′W) in the Northeast Greenland. The census area encompasses approximately 41 km2 and consists of a low-lying valley floor, surrounded by the Young Sound to the south and mountains (1000–1400 m a.s.l.) to the west and north. The tundra vegetation in the valley is a mixture of grasslands and fens, dominated by white arctic bell heather (Cassiope tetragona) heaths mixed with arctic willow (Salix arctica), snow-beds and mountain avens (Dryas sp.) heaths on higher ground (Bay, 1998). Average annual precipitation (1996–2012) is 207 mm, mean accumulated positive degrees in July is 194 °C (±42 s.d.) and average depth of snow the snowiest month is 82 cm (±36 s.d.) (Jensen et al., 2013). The snow-free period in the valley, defined as the period with snow cover below 10 cm, lasted on average 175 days and starts around 17 June. The intraannual (i.e., seasonal) muskox population dynamics in Zackenberg measured weekly varies from none or very few in wintertime and peaks around 17 August with 114 individuals (±45 s.d.). The mean weekly population size is around 90 individuals (±80 s.d.).

Data and Analysis

Data on the total number, age/sex class, and location of muskoxen were obtained from weekly censuses of the entire area from June to August each year (Schmidt et al., 2012) The census were conducted by a transect walk, encircling the valley, ensuring vantage points to see all of the valley All encountered muskoxen were classified and counted, using binoculars. A weekly census could be cancelled or postponed, due to bad weather conditions or low visibility

For short-term changes in population size, such as those considered here on an intraannual, weekly timescale, we may assume that birth and death rates equal zero. Furthermore, given that the animals were not individually recognizable, the model considered only net migration (i.e., I — E).To embrace both the apparent nonstationary trend in muskoxen observed (Fig. 1) and potential density dependence in the net migration of muskoxen into the Zackenberg Valley, we applied first-order autoregressive integrated moving average model (arima(1,0,0)) with an external regressor (xreg) (R Core Team, 2014). With xreg defined as week number (t)—that is, representing a vector with the length(Xt )—we get

e01_523.gif

where Xt is the ln-transformed population size week t. The slope a is a within-year average estimate of direction and size of net migration. Whereas positive values of a indicate overall immigration, negative values indicate an emigration over weeks. The intercept k is an index for the annual level of muskox abundance (henceforth termed “abundance”), and the first-order autoregressive coefficient β1 represents the degree of density dependence, with undercompensation for ß1 < 1, perfect compensation for ß1 = 1, and overcompensation for ß1 > 1 (Clutton-Brock, 1997).

FIGURE 1.

Weekly counts of the number of muskoxen in the Zackenberg Valley across 17 years. Each thin line represents a separate annual value, while the black line represents the weekly mean across years.

f01_523.jpg

The three coefficients in Equation 1 yielded a new data set of annual average coefficients, which, in turn, were analyzed across years by general linear regression to estimate and contrast across year variations to changes in climate, length of growth season, and sex-ratio settings. Specifically, summer temperature, spring snow cover, and the length of growth season and operational sex-ratio were selected as predictor variables with the three variables ß 1 , a, and k as response variables, respectively (Table 1). Snow is a major controller of biotic processes in the Arctic (Meltofte et al., 2008). Temperature governs the rate of plant growth through energy input to the system (Sturm et al., 2001; Natali et al., 2012; Buchwal et al., 2013). The growth season, which is defined as the number of days with <10-cm-thick snow cover, was included as it defines the length of period with easy access to high quality forage (Meltofte et al., 2008). Abiotic data were sampled from two meteorological masts placed in the center of the valley (Schmidt et al., 2012). Finally, the adult sex ratio was integrated as an additional predictor because males compete for females during rut and might influence the selected response variables ß 1 , a, and k (Forchhammer et al., 2005).

The effects of the selected climate and growth season variables with sex ratio on the response variables β 1 , a, and k were analyzed using generalized linear models (Zar, 1999). Full models were reduced using stepwise backward removal of least significant variables until the most parsimonious models were achieved. Parsimony of models was estimated using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). All analyses were conducted in R (version 2.15.1).

TABLE 1

Explanatory variables for muskox migration, along with a description of each measurement.

t01_523.gif

FIGURE 2.

(A) Average annual observations of muskox in the Zackenberg Valley, divided into mature males and females, unspecified mature individuals, immature individuals, and calves.(B) The percentage composition between sex and calves.

f02_523.jpg

Results

The data included within-year estimates of selected response variables (ß 1 , a, and k) for each of 17 consecutive years (1996–2012). These were based on between 7 and 17 (mean ± s.d. = 11.6 ± 3.2) consecutive weekly censuses made generally between 1 July and 30 August each year (Schmidt et al., 2012). Outside this period, one census was made on 16 March 2008 and one was made on 24 October 2011. The number of muskox observed per census ranged from 1 (22 July 1996) to 372 (4 October 2011).The series mean (s.d.) was 72 (62) muskoxen (Fig. 1).

FIGURE 3.

Interannual variation in (A) intercepts estimated from annual muskox censuses, and (B) the coefficients of the 1th order autoregression, together with (C) the immigration rate. Straight line indicates trend line. The autoregressive coefficients (ß1) and net migration rate (a) showed a temporal trend (p < 0.05), while the intercept coefficients (k) are not significant (p > 0.05).

f03_523.jpg

The average annual observations of mature males, females, immature, and calves, along with the population structure, can be seen in Fig. 2. Annual temporal linear regression of each group showed that the average annual observations of adult males and females had significantly increased over the study period (p < 0.05, df = 16, αmales = 2.3, αfemale = 2.6), while there is an unaltered average annual observation of immatures and calves (p > 0.05, df = 16) (Fig. 2).

The annual estimate of average level of abundance (k) increased across years although the trend was not significant (α = 0.003, p = 0.10) (Fig. 3, part A). The autoregression coeffient ß 1 increased significantly over years, indicating an overall decrease in the strength of density dependence from 1996 to 2012 (GLM: α = 0.03, S.E. = 0.014, p < 0.05, R2 = 0.25) (Fig. 3, part B). The annual net rate of immigration (a) decreased from 1996 to 2012 (GLM: α = 0.012, S.E. = 0.004, p < 0.05, R2 = 0.29) (Fig. 3, part C).

The accumulated positive degrees in summer increased by 10.6 °C per year from 1996 to 2012 (GLM: α = 10.6, S.E. = 3.1, p < 0.01, R2 = 0.43) (Fig. 4, part A). Spring snow cover decreased by 3% annually (GLM: α = -2.9, S.E. = 0.8, p < 0.01, R2 = 0.50) (Fig. 4, part D). The sex ratio decreased from 2.14 in 1996 to 0.8 in 2010 although the trend was not significant (GLM: α = -0.04, S.E. = 0.02, p = 0.06, R2 = 0.22) (Fig. 4, part C) There was no significant trend in the duration of the plant growth season (GLM: α = 1.6, S.E. = 2.3, p = 0.50, R2 = 0.04) (Fig. 4, part B).

FIGURE 4.

Annual variation in the selected explanatory variables: (A) Temperature (cumulative positive degree days in June, July, and August), (B) snow-free period (time between snow cover less than 10 cm and higher than 10 cm), (C) sex ratio (female to male ratio), and (D) June snow cover (snow cover in the valley on 12 June). Straight lines are regression lines. Temperature and June snow cover all display significant changes (p < 0.05), while the snow-free period displays no significant trend (p = 0.15). Sex ratio displays an almost significant trend (p = 0.057).

f04_523.jpg

We found significant parsimonious models for ß 1 and k but not for a (Table 2). Summer temperature had a significant positive effect on ß 1 (GLM: p <0.05, AIC = 12.0, R2 = 0.27) (α = 2.2 × 10-3, p = 0.03). Summer temperature (α = 2.4 × 10-3, p = 0.037) and the length of growth season (α = 5.5 × 10-3, p = 0.047) had positive effects on k (AIC = -55.6, R2 =0.58). There was a strong negative relationship between the net migration rate (a) and the density dependence (ß 1 ) (Pearson's r, ρ = -0.63).

Discussion

The results from the current study suggest that summer temperatures and length of growth season are primary drivers of intra-annual muskox population dynamics in the Zackenberg Valley The applied models demonstrated that summer temperatures both influenced the abundance of animals in the valley directly (k; Table 2), along with the strength of regulation of numbers in terms of its influence on density dependence (ß 1 ;Table 2).

The increase in ß 1 from 1996 to 2012 (Fig. 3, part A) indicates a decrease in the strength of density dependence (Clutton-Brock, 1997). Two conclusions follow. First, the level of intraspecific competition within the population was progressively released across the study period 1996–2012. Second, the competition release was most likely a consequence of improved foraging conditions for the muskox. Significant warming across the years (Fig. 4, part A) is likely to have resulted in a progressive increase in the annual rate of primary production (Sturm et al., 2001; Forbes et al., 2010), and consistent with this, we observed an independent positive relationship between the ß 1 and summer temperature (Table 2). Similarly, Forchhammer et al. (2005) demonstrated that the strength of density dependence acting on female muskox was associated with variation in the annual normalized deviation vegetation index (NDVI), a proxy of biomass, which was, in turn, associated with variation in snow cover.

TABLE 2

Results from the reduction of the generalized linear models, with extracted coefficients as dependent variables, and climate and sex ratio as explanatory variables. Numbers are regression coefficients, and bold numbers indicate significant (p < 0.05) and italic almost significant regressions (p < 0.10). Bold Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) numbers give the most parsimonious model.

t02_523.gif

The annual net rate of immigration decreased (a) across the time series along with the strength of density dependence, which resulted in a negative correlation between the two variables. We interpret this in terms of a cascading effect where immigrants draw other muskox into the area, resulting in increased competition and an increase in the strength of density dependence. This result suggests that competition and immigration rate are interconnected. However, the net rate of immigration rate was not influenced by any weather variables, suggesting no coupling between annual net migration and changes in forage conditions across years.

The annual level number of muskox present in the valley (k) did not significantly change over the study period. However, our analysis suggests that the number of muskox was associated with the summer temperature as well as the length of the growing season (Table 2). As both summer temperature and growing season have previously been associated with the timing of access to forage along with forage abundance (Chapin, 1983; Billings, 1987), it implies that the annual level of abundance of muskoxen in the valley is primarily driven by current year's resource base. Specifically, an increase in summer temperature and a lengthening of the growing season would result in increasing annual number of muskoxen in the Zackenberg Valley, likely due to increased food abundance and a prolonged period of access to forage.

In summary, our study suggests that the local dynamic of muskoxen in the Zackenberg Valley is interrelated with summer temperatures and length of growth season. As the climate is predicted to change in the High Arctic (Weller, 2005; IPCC, 2014), it is likely that the increased rates of primary production and earlier access to forage will increase the abundance of muskox in the valley until checked by density dependence. The predicted climate changes could thus be favorable to the muskox population in the Zackenberg Valley, unlike the predicted mixed effects on reindeer in the High Arctic (Tyler et al., 2008), associated with spring icing of the snow-pack. However, predicted effects such as droughts and disappearance of cooling snow patches have yet to be investigated, and possible nonlinear effects of temperatures could exist as with the High Arctic reindeer (Tyler et al., 2008).

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the ECOGLOBE initiative at Aarhus University, and data are derived from the Zackenberg Ecological Research Operations. We greatly appreciate the data assistance given from Niels Martin Schmidt, Lars Holst Hansen, and Jannik Hansen.

References Cited

  1. Bay, C., 1998: Vegetation Mapping of Zackenberg Valley, Northeast Greenland. Copenhagen: Danish Polar Center and Botanical Museum. Google Scholar
  2. Billings, W. D., 1987: Constraints to plant growth, reproduction and establishment in Arctic environments. Arctic and Alpine Research , 19: 357–365. Google Scholar
  3. Buchwal, A., Rachlewicz, G., Fonti, P., Cherubini, P., and Gartner, H., 2013: Temperature modulates intra-plant growth of Salix polaris from a high Arctic site (Svalbard). Polar Biology , 36: 1305–1318. Google Scholar
  4. Chapin, F. S., 1983: Direct and indirect effects of temperature on Arctic plants. Polar Biology , 2: 47–52. Google Scholar
  5. Clutton-Brock, T. H., 1997: Stability and instability in ungulate populations: an empirical analysis. American Naturalist , 149: 195–219. Google Scholar
  6. Forbes, B. C., Fauria, M. M., and Zetterberg, P., 2010: Russian Arctic warming and “greening” are closely tracked by tundra shrub willows. Global Change Biology , 16: 1542–1554. Google Scholar
  7. Forchhammer, M. C., 1995: Sex, age, and seasonal-variation in the foraging dynamics of muskoxen, Ovibos moschatus, in Greenland. Canadian Journal of Zoology , 73: 1344–1361. Google Scholar
  8. Forchhammer, M. C., and Boertmann, D., 1993:The muskoxen Ovibos moschatus in North and Northeast Greenland— population trends and the influence of abiotic parameters on population-dynamics. Ecography , 16: 299–308. Google Scholar
  9. Forchhammer, M. C., and Boomsma, J. J., 1998: Optimal mating strategies in nonterritorial ungulates: a general model tested on muskoxen. Behavioral Ecology , 9: 136–143. Google Scholar
  10. Forchhammer, M. C., Post, E., Berg, T. B. G., Hoye, T. T., and Schmidt, N. M., 2005: Local-scale and short-term herbivore-plant spatial dynamics reflect influences of large-scale climate. Ecology , 86: 2644–2651. Google Scholar
  11. Høye, T. T., Post, E., Meltofte, H., Schmidt, N. M., and Forchhammer, M. C., 2007: Rapid advancement of spring in the High Arctic. Current Biology , 17: 449–451. Google Scholar
  12. IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report Summary Chapter for Policymakers. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Google Scholar
  13. Jensen, L. M., Rasch, M., and Schmidt, N. M., 2013: Zackenberg Ecological Research Operations, 18th Annual Report 2012. Roskilde, Denmark: Aarhus Univesity, Danish Centre for Environment and Energy. Google Scholar
  14. Kerby, J., and Post, E., 2013: Capital and income breeding traits differentiate trophic match-mismatch dynamics in large herbivores. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , 368: doi  http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0484Google Scholar
  15. Meltofte, H., Christensen, T. R., Elberling, B., Forchhammer, M. C., and Rasch, M., 2008: High-Arctic ecosystem dynamics in a changing climate—ten years of monitoring and research at Zackenberg Research Station, Northeast Greenland— introduction. Advances in Ecological Research , 40: 1–12. Google Scholar
  16. Mortensen, L. O., Jeppesen, E., Schmidt, N.M., Christoffersen, K. S., Tamstorf, M. P., and Forchhammer, M. C., 2014: Temporal trends and variability in a High Arctic ecosystem in Greenland: multidimensional analyses of limnic and terrestrial ecosystems. Polar Biology , 37: 1073–1082. Google Scholar
  17. Natali, S. M., Schuur, E. A. G., and Rubin, R. L., 2012: Increased plant productivity in Alaskan tundra as a result of experimental warming of soil and permafrost. Journal of Ecology , 100: 488–498. Google Scholar
  18. R Core Team, 2014: R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Google Scholar
  19. Schmidt, N. M., Hansen, L. H., Hansen, J., Berg, T. B., and Meltofte, H., 2012: BioBasis: Conceptual Design and Sampling Procedures of the Biological Monitoring Programme Within Zackenberg Basic. 15th edition. Roskilde, Denmark: Department of BioScience, Aarhus University,. Google Scholar
  20. Sturm, M., Racine, C., and Tape, K., 2001: Climate change— increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic. Nature , 411: 546–547. Google Scholar
  21. Thing, H., Klein, D. R., Jingfors, K., and Holt, S., 1987: Ecology of muskoxen in Jameson Land, Northeast Greenland. Holarctic Ecology , 10, 95–103. Google Scholar
  22. Tyler, N.J. C., Forchhammer, M. C., and Øritsland, N. A., 2008: Nonlinear effects of climate and density in the dynamics of a fluctuating population of reindeer. Ecology , 89: 1675–1686. Google Scholar
  23. Weller, G., 2005: Summary and synthesis of the ACIA. In Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 1042. Google Scholar
  24. White, R. G., Holleman, D. F., and Tiplady, B. A., 1989: Seasonal body weight, body condition, and lactational trends in muskoxen. Canadian Journal of Zoology , 67: 1125–1133. Google Scholar
  25. Zar, J. H., 1999: Biostatistical Analysis. Fourth edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
© 2016 Regents of the University of Colorado
Lars O. Mortensen, Charlotte Moshøj and Mads C. Forchhammer "Density and Climate Influence Seasonal Population Dynamics in an Arctic Ungulate," Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 48(3), (1 August 2016). https://doi.org/10.1657/AAAR0015-052
Received: 13 August 2015; Accepted: 1 March 2016; Published: 1 August 2016
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top