Translator Disclaimer
22 January 2020 Individual Black-Tailed Godwits Do Not Stick to Single Routes: A Hypothesis on How Low Population Densities Might Decrease Social Conformity
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The miniaturization of tracking devices is now rapidly increasing our knowledge on the spatiotemporal organization of seasonal migration. So far, most studies aimed at understanding within- and between-individual variation in migratory routines focus on single populations. This has also been the case for continental Black-tailed Godwits Limosa l. limosa (hereafter Godwits), with most work carried out on individuals from the Dutch breeding population, migrating in relatively large numbers in the westernmost part of the range. Here we report the migratory timing and routes of four adult individuals of the same subspecies from the low-density population in eastern Poland and compare this with previously published data on Godwits breeding in The Netherlands. During northward migration, the birds from Poland departed and arrived later from their wintering and breeding grounds. However, on southward migration the Polish breeding Godwits departed earlier, but arrived one month later than the Dutch birds on their wintering grounds in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite the small sample size of tracked birds from Poland, we find a significantly higher between-individual variation in timing during southward migration in Polish Godwits as compared to the Dutch Godwits. Furthermore, not only did migratory routes differ, but the few Polish Godwits tracked showed a higher level of between- and within-individual variation in route choice during both southward and northward migration. To explain this remarkable discrepancy, we propose that the properties of transmission of social information may be different between Godwits from a high-density population (i.e. the one in The Netherlands) and a low-density population (in Poland) and that this leads to different levels of canalization. To examine this hypothesis, future studies should not only follow individuals from an early age onwards, but also quantify and experimentally manipulate their social environments during migration.

In the past two decades, the development of new and smaller tracking devices created the possibility to describe the, very often surprising, migrations of an increasing number of bird species (e.g. Wikelski et al. 2007, Gill et al. 2009, Bridge et al. 2011). As a result, we now have a better understanding of when and where migrating birds are throughout the annual cycle (e.g. Bauer & Hoye 2014, Winkler et al. 2016). At the same time, the increasing number of repeated individual tracks reveal an intriguing palette of intraspecific variation in the spatial and temporal consistency of migration, which continues to develop our understanding of the various factors influencing the spatial and temporal patterns of migration (Bairlein 2003, Conklin et al. 2013, Kölzsch et al. 2019, Verhoeven et al. 2019).

Depending on the costs and benefits of being consistent in timing and route during migration, individuals and populations are expected to vary in the consistency of their itineraries (Alerstam et al. 2003, Drent et al. 2003). For instance, in shorebirds and geese, birds which are often assumed to rely on resources that are exclusively available at specific sites and/or moments, we often observe rather high consistency in migratory routing and or timing (Fox et al. 2003, Eichhorn et al. 2009, Senner et al. 2014, Ruthrauff et al. 2019). In contrast, for birds such as songbirds and seabirds, which often feed on prey that are available across wide geographical ranges and/or fluctuate strongly between years, opposite patterns are seen (Dias et al. 2010, Winkler et al. 2014, Weimerskirch et al. 2015, van Wijk et al. 2016). However, as extrinsic and intrinsic selection pressures differ between populations, comparative population-specific variation can serve as an additional source of inference to understand spatiotemporal variation in migration (Piersma 2007, Webster et al. 2002).

A flock of Black-tailed Godwits staging in the Tagus Estuary where they prepare for their northward migration (photo Jan van de Kam, Tagus Estuary; Portugal, 19 February 2015).

img-z2-7_251.jpg

Continental Black-tailed Godwits Limosa l. limosa (hereafter Godwits) are long-distance migratory shorebirds breeding across much of lowland Europe and rely on a distinct number of staging sites during migration (Beintema & Drost 1986, Hooijmeijer et al. 2013, Verhoeven et al. in prep.). Wintering birds can be found on the Iberian Peninsula, Greece, the Black Sea coast, North Africa and in sub-Saharan Africa (Beintema & Drost 1986, Zwarts et al. 2009, Gerritsen et al. 2015). Recent work on the migration ecology of Godwits has focused on staging populations at the Iberian Peninsula and a breeding population in southwest Friesland, The Netherlands (Hooijmeijer et al. 2013, Kentie et al. 2017, Senner et al. 2015, 2018, 2019, Verhoeven et al. in prep., 2018, 2019). Briefly, this work revealed a large, but yet unexplained, amount of within- and between-individual variation in the temporal organization of migration (Verhoeven et al. 2019). In contrast, spatial characteristics, such as the use of migratory routes, staging sites and wintering sites, were found to be rather consistent within individuals of this population (Verhoeven et al. 2018, in prep.).

Here we explore the migration of Godwits across a larger range by comparing individuals from two breeding populations which are quite distant (1200 km), yet genetically indistinguishable on the basis of neutral markers (Trimbos et al. 2014). In total we tracked four Godwits breeding in eastern Poland during three consecutive southward and two northward migrations. We compare the timing and orientation of these migrations with those of individuals from the mentioned Dutch breeding population.

METHODS

Study area and capture of birds

For this study, Godwits were captured in a relatively small breeding population (30–40 breeding pairs) in Gródek valley, eastern Poland (53°05′N, 23°40′E) during the breeding season of 2016. Using automated drop-cages, we captured Godwits on the nest. Following capture, Godwits were marked with a unique combination of colour-rings and a metal ring. Subsequently we measured wing length, tarsus length, tarsus-toe length, bill length and total head length, and we weighed the bird to the nearest gram using an electronic scale. In order to determine the molecular sex of each captured bird, we took a small blood sample from the brachial vein (see van der Velde et al. 2017 for method).

To investigate the timing of migration, migratory routes and staging sites during south- and northward migration and the wintering sites of these Godwits, we deployed four 5-g solar platform transmitting terminals (PTT; Model 100, Microwave Telemetry, Columbia, MD, USA). Transmitters were pre-programmed to turn on for 8 hours and to turn off for 24 hours year-round. We placed transmitters on the back of each bird using a leg-loop system that consisted of Dynemaa-rope (Lankhorst Ropes, Sneek). The weight of the PTT and harness represented c. 2.3% of the total body mass at capture (mean body mass: 270 g). All birds were monitored until the PTT stopped transmitting, or if the temperature sensor started to follow a day-night rhythm which indicated the death of a bird (Loonstra et al. 2019).

Locations were retrieved via the CLS tracking system ( www.argos-system.org) and passed through the ‘Best Hybrid-filter’ algorithm (Douglas et al. 2012) to remove unrealistic locations that exceeded 120 km/h, while retaining location classes with quality 3, 2, 1, 0, A, B. On average this resulted in 0.71 ± 0.25 (SD) locations per duty cycle. Locations used for this study are stored on  www.movebank.org.

Data analysis

To summarize the timing of migration during south- and northward migration, we determined for each individual when it crossed one of the nine chosen latitudinal boundaries (52°N, 48°N, 44°N, 40°N, 36°N, 32°N, 28°N, 24°N, 20°N). Subsequently, we used the calculated standard deviation of the population in timing at all these boundaries during south and northward migration as a measure of between-individual variation in timing. The within-individual variation in timing at a boundary was determined by calculating the largest timing difference within an individual across years at that boundary. The chosen arbitrary boundaries are the same as Verhoeven et al. (2019) and enable us to compare the timing of migration during southward and northward migration between Godwits breeding in The Netherlands and eastern Poland at all crossings except 36°N (unfortunately, in Verhoeven et al. 2019 we could not distinguish stops below and above this boundary; see Table 1 for more details).

To visualize and compare the migratory routes and orientation during south- and northward migration, we determined the east-west movement in kilometres within all eight consecutive latitudinal segments (Verhoeven et al. in prep.; see Table 1 for more details). Based on these movements, we calculated the standard deviation within the population within a segment and used this as our between-individual variation measure. Within-individual variation in migratory routes was determined by calculating the difference between the two largest east-west movements within an individual per latitudinal segment.

To test for statistical differences in the absolute difference and within-individual differences between both populations in both timing and orientation we used a Mann-Whitney U test in the Program R v. 3.4.3 (R Core Development Team 2018). The between-individual differences in timing and orientation between both populations were compared using the Levene's test which is part of the package ‘car’ (Fox & Weisberg 2019).

RESULTS

Of the four tracked Godwits (three males and one female) breeding in eastern Poland, the number of southward and northward migrations per individual were: 1/0, 2/1, 2/2 and 3/2 (S/N; Figure 1).

Migratory timing

Southward migration from the breeding grounds in eastern Poland started on 18 May and the last bird left the breeding area on 11 June, yielding in a 34-d time window for the start of migration (Figure 2). Even though this was two weeks earlier than for Godwits breeding in The Netherlands, the long stopover of all Polish Godwits between 44°N and 48°N caused them to arrive on average more than a month later at sub-Saharan wintering grounds than the Dutch birds (Table 1A, Figure 2). The amount of within-individual variation did not differ between Godwits breeding in The Netherlands and eastern Poland (Table 1A). However, the amount of between-individual variation in timing differed between the two populations and was larger for Godwits from Poland at the last six boundaries (44°N–20°N; Table 1A).

Figure 1.

Southward (2016, 2017, 2018; solid lines) and northward (2017, 2018; dashed lines) migration routes of the four Godwits that were tracked from their breeding areas in eastern Poland. Circles show stops and wintering areas. Due to the duty cycle (24 h off, 8 h on) we only report stops longer than 32 h (circles).

img-z4-8_251.jpg

Figure 2.

Timing of migration of four Polish adult Godwits (black lines) compared with adult Godwits breeding in The Netherlands (grey lines; after Verhoeven et al. 2019). Note that the timing of crossing the boundary at 36°N is excluded for Godwits breeding in The Netherlands.

img-AUo_251.jpg

Northward migration from the wintering area in the Inner Niger Delta took place over a 53-d period, ranging from 31 January to 25 March, and was on average two months later than the departure of Godwits breeding in The Netherlands (Table 1B, Figure 2). Average arrival on the breeding grounds occurred only one month later than the Dutch birds (Table 1B; Figure 2). The two populations had similar within- and between-individual variation in timing of migration at all crossings (Table 1B, Figure 2).

Migration routes

During southward migration, three routes could be distinguished for Godwits breeding in eastern Poland: route 1 via the delta of the Danube in Romania to Lake Chad (and subsequently moving to the Inner Niger Delta for the rest of winter), route 2 with a similar stopover in the Danube delta, but with a direct migration to the Inner Niger Delta, and route 3 going to eastern Hungary with a direct migration to the Inner Niger Delta (Figure 1). While all individuals (n = 3) stayed at least part of the winter in the Inner Niger Delta, one individual (i157489) performed an additional ‘westward’ migration at the end of October, i.e. from Lake Chad to the Inner Niger Delta in 2016 (great circle distance: 1851 km). This did not happen in 2017 when she flew straight to the Inner Niger Delta (Figure 1).

During northward migration, we could also distinguish three different routes, with all birds (n = 3) on these routes converging in eastern Hungary before reaching the breeding grounds in eastern Poland (Figure 1). Route 1 went from the Inner Niger Delta to the Iberian Peninsula and then to eastern Hungary; route 2 went from the Inner Niger Delta to the coast of the Adriatic Sea in northern Italy and then to eastern Hungary; route 3 went from the Inner Niger Delta to the north-eastern coast of the Aegean Sea in Greece and/or Turkey and then to eastern Hungary (Figure 1).

The three Godwits tracked for more than one migration were not faithful to a single route during south- or northward migration (Figure 1). During both south and northward migration, Polish Godwits oriented differently from Dutch Godwits during multiple parts of the migratory trajectories (Table 1C, 1D). Also, Godwits breeding in eastern Poland showed a higher within- and between-individual variation in the directions taken at various points along the route (Table 1C, 1D).

DISCUSSION

By comparing the migratory routes and timing of two distant breeding populations of the Continental Black-tailed Godwits, we revealed significant population differences in the route use during, and the timing of, migration. Despite the small sample size of individuals tracked from Poland, we found a higher within- and between-individual variation in migratory routes of Polish compared with Dutch Godwits. While we did not find differences in the within-individual variation in timing of migration between the two populations, the amount of between-individual variation differed significantly: on southward migration between-individual variation was larger among the Polish birds for the last six boundary crossings (Table 1).

Table 1.

Observed timing and between- and within-individual variation in timing of migration for Godwits breeding in The Netherlands1 and eastern Poland (A) during southward migration (mean ± SD) and (B) during northward migration (mean ± SD). Observed orientation and between- and within-individual variation in orientation of migration for Godwits breeding in The Netherlands2 and eastern Poland (C) during southward migration (mean ± SD) and (D) during northward migration (mean ± SD). 1after data from Verhoeven et al. 2019; 2after data from Verhoeven et al. in prep. 3First significance measure relates to the significance of absolute difference in timing or orientation and second significant measure to between-individual difference in timing or orientation.

Table 1A. Timing – Southward migration.

img-z6-9_251.gif

Continued

img-z7-9_251.gif

Continued

img-z8-8_251.gif

Continued

img-z9-9_251.gif

Even though breeding started at rather similar dates in Poland and The Netherlands (average initiation of breeding in The Netherlands 21 April vs. 22 April in Poland; Verhoeven et al. 2019, in prep., P. Chylarecki unpubl. data), Godwits breeding in eastern Poland arrived over a shorter interval and significantly later in the season than birds breeding in The Netherlands. This difference might hint at population-specific strategies of nutrient accumulation for breeding (cf. Piersma et al. 2005). Perhaps Godwits breeding in Poland accumulate more nutrient stores along the way than Dutch Godwits (Drent et al. 2006); and/or the arrival of Godwits in Poland is constrained by a later onset of spring and resource availability (Briedis et al. 2016).

Interestingly, during southward migration, Godwits breeding in eastern Poland departed significantly earlier from the breeding grounds than Godwits from The Netherlands. This may have been caused by early nest or chick loss (across all years, none of the birds tracked from Poland successfully fledged chicks) or by a lack of high-quality habitat that would allow them to initiate primary moult at the breeding grounds (van Dijk 1980). After this early departure from the breeding grounds, all Polish Godwits staged for a considerable time at staging areas between 48°N and 44°N. Perhaps, Polish Godwits use this period to moult their flight feathers, whereas Dutch birds start primary moult already on the breeding grounds (van Dijk 1980, Márquez-Ferrando et al. 2018).

Because they rely on distinct and widely dispersed food-rich freshwater or coastal mudflats, long-distance migratory shorebirds like Godwits are expected to exhibit high consistency in migratory routes (Newton 2008, Ruthrauff et al. 2019). The flexibility to switch between routes observed in Polish Godwits during both southward and northward migration, contradicts this expectation and suggests that Godwits either (1) have an innate map of different suitable migratory routes, (2) continuously learn through the use of social information, or (3) discover and switch routes through a form of asocial learning (Kendal et al. 2005, Creswell 2014, Flack et al. 2012, Mueller et al. 2013, Berdahl et al. 2018, Mouritsen 2018, Kölzsch et al. 2019). Unfortunately, we only tracked experienced adult birds and in the absence of information on the composition of migratory flocks, we are unable to assess whether the conditions for individual learning and social knowledge sharing existed.

Nevertheless, we hypothesize that when social information is lacking, inexperienced individuals are more likely to develop more individual routes on their very first southward and/or northward migration, i.e. routes that are more different from one another than when birds are able to fly with many experienced conspecifics. Subsequently, if individuals from low density populations survive, and if the spatial environment allows these alternative strategies, every year this mechanism generates more between-individual differences in migratory routes within the low-density population. If information about different routes and goals can be shared with other individuals during overlapping occurrences in space and time (Berdahl et al. 2018), these individuals are likely to switch between routes (higher within-individual variation). Thus, the degree of between-individual overlap in space and time and the amount and strength of social information will ultimately determine the extent of social canalization, which will be reflected in the amount of within- and between-individual variation in migratory routes that is shown by a population.

Following this, we argue that social canalization may play a larger role in the relatively large and concentrated Dutch population (c. 33,000 breeding pairs; Kentie et al. 2016), than in the small and scattered Polish population (c. 2000 breeding pairs; Ławicki et al. 2011). After the first southward migration, in both populations young and experienced older individuals overlap in their occurrence on wintering sites and are able to share information during the nonbreeding season. However, as different Polish individuals are more likely to have knowledge on different possible routes, these individuals have a higher probability to switch between routes and thus exhibit a higher within-individual variation in migratory routes.

We propose that the rate of information exchange and the rate in which new routes are ‘developed’ will, together with the relative density of newly generated information within the population, determine how fast individuals from a population canalize and how conformity develops with age. Perhaps, the fast rate of information exchange and canalization of migratory strategy within the Dutch population is also illustrated by the observation of a left-skewed age distribution of Dutch Godwit recoveries in the Po Delta in Italy (Beintema 2015). While this pattern could be explained by the selective disappearance of individuals migrating via Italy, we believe that it is more likely that social information on other routes causes them to use the more common Atlantic route later on in life. Nonetheless, an alternative, but not mutually exclusive, explanation for the larger within- and between-individual variation the Polish Godwits is that the spatial distribution of geographical barriers (e.g. Atlantic Ocean) and favourite ecological conditions may be different between both populations.

In conclusion, our study comparing two Godwit populations revealed remarkable population differences in both the between-individual variation and the within-individual flexibility of migratory strategies that would not have been expected in view of the lower sample size of tracked Polish Godwits. We raise new questions on the role of social environments in the shaping of migratory routines in birds not migrating in family units. To pursue these ideas, and to understand how the innate control of migration interacts with the learning through individuals including the sharing of social information of other individuals, we will have to track individuals from birth into adulthood whilst at the same time quantifying and manipulating the geographical and social environment of migrating birds by displacing and delaying inexperienced individuals.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Yvonne Verkuil for molecular sexing and PTOP (Polish Society for Bird Protection) for giving us access to their properties. We thank Wouter Vansteelant for a stimulating and visionary review of the manuscript. This study was funded by the Spinoza Premium 2014 awarded to TP by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), a grant from the Gieskes-Strijbis Fonds to TP and an anonymous donation to TP. AHJL and MAV conceived the idea and analysed the data; AHJL and ES caught the birds and deployed the transmitters for this study; AHJL wrote an initial draft of the manuscript, which was then jointly rewritten. The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The work was done under license number WPN.6401.126.2015.WL following the Polish Animal Welfare Act.

REFERENCES

1.

Alerstam T., Hedenström A. & Åkesson S. 2003. Long-distance migration: evolution and determinants. Oikos 103: 247–260. Google Scholar

2.

Bairlein F. 2003. The study of bird migrations – some future perspectives. Bird Study 50: 243–253. Google Scholar

3.

Bauer S. & Hoye B.J. 2014. Migratory animals couple biodiversity and ecosystem functioning worldwide. Science 344: 1242552. Google Scholar

4.

Beintema A.J. 2015. De Italian Connection. De Grutto. Atlas-Contact, Amsterdam, pp. 183–203. Google Scholar

5.

Beintema A.J. & Drost N. 1986. The migration of the Black-tailed Godwit. Gerfaut 76: 37–62. Google Scholar

6.

Berdahl A.M., Kao, A.B., Flack A., Westley P.A.H., Codling E.A., Couzin I.D., Dell A.I. & Biro D. 2018. Collective animal navigation and migratory culture: from theoretical models to empirical evidence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 373: 20170009. Google Scholar

7.

Bridge E., Thorup K., Bowlin M.S., Chilson P.B., Diehl R.H., Fléron R.W., Hartl P., Kays R., Kelly J.F., Robinson R.D. & Wikelski M. 2011. Technology on the move: Recent and forthcoming innovations for tracking migratory birds. BioScience 61: 689–698. Google Scholar

8.

Briedis M., Hahn S., Gustafsson L., Henshaw I., Träff J., Král M. & Adamík P. 2016. Breeding latitude leads to different temporal but not spatial organization of the annual cycle in a long-distance migrant. J. Avian Biol. 47: 743–748. Google Scholar

9.

Conklin J.R., Battley P.F. & Potter M.A. 2013. Absolute consistency: Individual versus population variation in annual-cycle schedules of a long-distance migrant bird. PloS ONE 8: e54535. Google Scholar

10.

Dias M.P., Granadeiro J.P., Philips R.A., Alonso H. & Catry P. 2010. Breaking the routine: individual Cory's Shearwaters shift winter destinations between hemispheres and across ocean basins. Proc. R. Soc. B 278: 1786–1793. Google Scholar

11.

Douglas D.C., Weinzierl R., Davidson S.C., Kays R., Wikelski N. & Bohrer S. 2012. Moderating Argos location errors in animal tracking. Methods. Ecol. Evol. 3: 999–1007. Google Scholar

12.

Drent R.H., Both C., Green M., Madsen J. & Piersma T. 2003. Pay-offs and penalties of competing migratory schedules. Oikos 103: 274–292. Google Scholar

13.

Drent R.H., Fox A.D. & Stahl J. 2006. Travelling to breed. J. Ornithol. 147: 122–134. Google Scholar

14.

Eichhorn G., Drent R.H., Stahl J., Leito A. & Alerstam T. 2009. Skipping the Baltic: the emergence of a dichotomy of alternative spring migration strategies in Russian Barnacle Geese. J. Anim. Ecol. 78: 63–72. Google Scholar

15.

Flack A., Pettit B., Freeman R., Guilford T. & Biro D. 2012. What are leaders made of? The role of experience in determining leader-follower relations in Homing Pigeons. Anim. Behav. 83: 703–709. Google Scholar

16.

Fox J. & Weisberg S. 2019. An (R) companion to applied regression, third edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA. Google Scholar

17.

Fox A.D., Glahder C.M. & Walsh A.J. 2003. Spring migration routes and timing of Greenland White-fronted Geese – results from satellite telemetry. Oikos 103: 415–425. Google Scholar

18.

Gill R.E. Jr., Tibbitts T.L., Douglas D.C., Handel C.M., Mulcahy D.M., Gottschalck J.C., Warnock N., McCaffery B.J., Battley P.F. & Piersma T. 2009. Extreme endurance flights by land-birds crossing the Pacific Ocean: ecological corridor rather than barrier? Proc. R. Soc. B 276: 447–457. Google Scholar

19.

Gerritsen G.J., Faber R. & Pinchuk P.V. 2015. Belarusianbreeding Black-tailed Godwit seen on the east coast of Spain during northward migration 2014. Wader Study Group Bull. 121: 201–202. Google Scholar

20.

Hooijmeijer J.C.E.W., Senner N.R., Tibbitts T.L., Gill R.L. Jr., Douglas D.C., Bruinzeel L.W., Wymenga E. & Piersma T. 2013 Post-breeding migration of Dutch-breeding Black-tailed Godwits: timing, routes, use of stopovers, and nonbreeding destinations. Ardea 101: 141–152. Google Scholar

21.

Kendal R.L., Coolen I., van Bergen Y. & Laland K.N. 2005. Tradeoffs in the adaptive use of social and asocial learning. Adv. Study Behav. 35: 333–379. Google Scholar

22.

Kentie R., Senner N.R., Hooijmeijer J.C.E.W., Márquez-Ferrando R., Figuerola J., Masero J.A., Verhoeven M.A. & Piersma T. 2016. Estimating the size of the Dutch breeding population of Continental Black-tailed Godwits from 2007–2015 using resighting data from spring staging sites. Ardea 114: 213–225. Google Scholar

23.

Kentie K., Marquez-Ferrando R., Figuerola J., Gangoso L., Hooijmeijer J.C.E.W., Loonstra A.H.J., Robin F., Sarasa M., Senner N., Valkema H., Verhoeven M.A. & Piersma T. 2017. Does wintering north or south of the Sahara correlate with timing and breeding performance in Black-tailed Godwits. Ecol. Evol. 7: 2812–2820. Google Scholar

24.

Kölzsch A., Müskens G.J.D.M., Szinai P., Moonen S., Glazov P., Kruckenberg H., Wikelski M. & Nolet B.A. 2019. Flyway connectivity and exchange primarily driven by moult migration in geese. Move. Ecol. 7:3. Google Scholar

25.

Ławicki Ł., Wylegała P., Batycki A., Kajzer A., Guentzel S., Jasiński M., Kruszyk R., Rubacha S. & Z·mihorski M. 2011. Long-term decline of grassland waders in western Poland. Vogelwelt 132: 101–108. Google Scholar

26.

Loonstra A.H.J., Verhoeven M.A., Senner N.R., Both C. & Piersma T. 2019. Adverse wind conditions during northward Sahara crossings increase the in-flight mortality of Black-tailed Godwits. Ecol. Lett. 22: 2060–266. Google Scholar

27.

Márquez-Ferrando R., Remisiewicz M., Masero J.A., Kentie R., Senner N., Verhoeven M.A., Hooijmeijer J.C.E.W., Pardal S., Sarasa M., Piersma T. & Fiquerola J. 2018. Primary moult of continental Black-tailed Godwits Limosa limosa limosa in the Doňana wetlands, Spain. Bird Study 65: 132–139. Google Scholar

28.

Mouritsen H. 2018. Long-distance navigation and magnetoreception in migratory animals. Nature 558: 50–59. Google Scholar

29.

Mueller T., O'Hara R.B., Converse S.J., Urbanek R. & Fagan W.F. 2013. Social learning of migratory performance. Science 341: 999–1002. Google Scholar

30.

Newton I. 2008. The Migration Ecology of Birds. London: Academic Press. Google Scholar

31.

Piersma T. 2007. Using the power of comparison to explain habitat use and migration strategies. J. Ornithol. 148: S45–S59. Google Scholar

32.

Piersma T., Rogers D.I., Gonzalez P.M., Zwarts L., Niles L.J., de Lima S. do Nascimento I., Minton C.D.T. & Baker A.J. 2005. Fuel storage rates before northward flights in Red Knots worldwide: facing the severest ecological constraint in tropical intertidal environments? In: Greenberg R. & Marra P.P. (eds) Birds of two worlds: ecology and evolution of migration. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 262–273. Google Scholar

33.

R Core Development Team 2018. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Google Scholar

34.

Senner N.R., Hochachka W.M., Fox J.W. & Afanasyev V. 2014. An exception to the rule: Carry-over effects do not accumulate in a long-distance migratory bird. PLoS ONE 9: e86588. Google Scholar

35.

Senner N.R., Verhoeven M.A., Abad-Gómez J.M., Gutiérrez J.S., Hooijmeijer J.C.E.W., Kentie R., Masero J.A., Tibbitts T.L. & Piersma T. 2015. When Siberia came to The Netherlands: the response of Black-tailed Godwits to a rare spring weather event. J. Anim. Ecol. 84: 1164–1176. Google Scholar

36.

Senner N.R., Stager M., Verhoeven M.A., Cheviron Z.A., Piersma T. & Bouten W. 2018. High-altitude shorebird migration in the absence of topographical barriers: avoiding high air temperatures and searching for profitable winds. Proc. R. Soc. B 285: 20180589. Google Scholar

37.

Senner N.R., Verhoeven M.A., Abad-Gómez J.M., Alves J.A., Hooijmeijer J.C.E.W., Howison R.A., Kentie R., Loonstra A.H.J., Masero J.A., Rocha A., Stager M. & Piersma T. 2019. High migratory survival and highly variable migratory behaviour in black-tailed godwits. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7: 96. Google Scholar

38.

Ruthrauff D.R., Tibbitts T.L. & Gill R.E. Jr. 2019. Flexible timing of annual movements across consistently used sites by Marbled Godwits breeding in Alaska. Auk 136: 1–11. Google Scholar

39.

Trimbos K.B., Doorenweerd C., Kraaijeveld K., Musters C.J.M., Groen N.M., de Knijff P., Piersma T. & de Snoo G.R. 2014. Patterns in nuclear and mitochondrial DNA reveal historical land recent isolation in the Black-tailed Godwit (Limosa limosa). PLoS ONE 9: e83949. Google Scholar

40.

van der Velde M., Haddrath O., Verkuil Y.I., Baker A.J. & Piersma T. 2017. New primers for molecular sex identification of waders. Wader Study 124: 147–151. Google Scholar

41.

van Dijk A.J. 1980. Observations on the moult of the Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa. Limosa 53: 49–57. Google Scholar

42.

van Wijk R.E., Bauer S. & Schaub M. 2016. Repeatability of individual migration routes, wintering sites, and timing in a long-distance migrant bird. Ecol. Evol. 6: 8679–8685. Google Scholar

43.

Verhoeven M.A., Loonstra A.H.J., Hooijmeijer J.C.E.W., Masero J.A., Piersma T. & Senner N.R. 2018. Generational shift in northward staging site use by a long-distance migratory bird. Biol. Lett. 14: 20170663. Google Scholar

44.

Verhoeven M.A., Loonstra A.H.J., Senner N.R., McBride A.D., Both C. & Piersma, T. 2019. Variation from an unknown source: large inter-individual differences in migrating Black-tailed Godwits. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7:31. Google Scholar

45.

Webster M.S., Marra, P.P., Haig S.M., Bensch S. & Holmes R.T. 2002. Links between worlds: unraveling migratory connectivity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 76–83. Google Scholar

46.

Weimerskirch H., Delord K., Guitteaud A., Phillips R.A. & Pinet P. 2015. Extreme variation in migration strategies between and within Wandering Albatross populations during their sabbatical year, and their fitness consequences. Sci. Rep. 5: 8853. Google Scholar

47.

Wikelski M., Kays R.W., Kasdin N.J., Thorup K., Smith J.A. & Swenson G.W. 2007. Going wild: what a global small-animal tracking system could do for experimental biologists. J. Exp. Biol. 210: 181–186. Google Scholar

48.

Winkler D.W., Jørgensen C., Both C., Houston A.I., McNamara J.M., Levey D.J., Partecke J., Fudickar A., Kacelnik A., Roshier D. & Piersma T. 2014. Cues, strategies, and outcomes: how migrating vertebrates track environmental change. Move. Ecol. 2: 10. Google Scholar

49.

Winkler D.W., Shamoun-Baranes J. & Piersma T. 2016. Avian migration and dispersal. In: Lovette, I.J. & Fitzpatrick, J.W. (eds), Cornell Lab of Ornithology handbook of bird biology, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 452–492. Google Scholar

50.

Zwarts L., Bijlsma R.G., van der Kamp J. & Wymenga E. 2009. Living on the edge: Wetlands and birds in a changing Sahel. KNNV Uitgeverij, Zeist, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Google Scholar

Appendices

SAMENVATTING

Dankzij het gebruik van nauwkeurige zenders is onze kennis over de individuele en soortspecifieke variatie in de ruimtelijke en temporele organisatie van vogeltrek sterk gegroeid. Tot dusverre zijn de meeste studies gericht geweest op het documenteren van de variatie in trek tussen en binnen individuen binnen één populatie. Dit is ook het geval voor de continentale ondersoort van de Grutto Limosa l. limosa, aangezien het meeste onderzoek is uitgevoerd aan Grutto's die in relatief hoge dichtheden in Nederland broeden. In dit artikel beschrijven wij de trekroute en het moment van de trek van volwassen Grutto's die in het oosten van Polen broeden en vergelijken wij die met eerder gepubliceerde resultaten van Nederlandse broedvogels. Tijdens de noordwaartse trek vertrokken de Poolse Grutto's later uit hun Afrikaanse overwinteringsgebieden dan Nederlandse Grutto's en kwamen ook later in hun broedgebieden aan. De Poolse Grutto's verlieten na de broedtijd hun broedgebied eerder, maar arriveerden gemiddeld een maand na de Nederlandse vogels in hun overwinteringsgebieden. De Poolse vogels verbleven onderweg veel langer op tussenstops tussen hun broed- en overwinteringsbieden. De variatie in de timing van de zuidwaartse trek tussen individuele vogels was bij Grutto's uit Polen groter dan bij Nederlandse Grutto's. Ten slotte vertoonden de Poolse Grutto's zowel op de noord- als de zuidwaartse trek een veel grotere variatie in trekroute tussen individuen en jaren dan Nederlandse Grutto's. Wij postuleren dat een verschil in gruttodichtheid tussen beide populaties (hoog in Nederland, laag in Polen) hieraan ten grondslag ligt. Door het dichtheidsverschil zou de kans op sociale informatie bij de Poolse vogels op hun eerste zuid- en noordwaartse trek kleiner zijn dan bij de Nederlandse vogels met als gevolg dat de Poolse Grutto's vaker op eigen houtje trekken en daardoor vaker verschillende trek-routes ontwikkelen. Als deze informatie vervolgens later in het leven gedeeld wordt met andere individuen, resulteert dit in een grotere variatie binnen en tussen individuen. Om deze hypo-these verder te onderzoeken, zullen toekomstige studies niet alleen individuen van jongs af aan moeten volgen, maar ook de sociale omgeving tijdens de trek kwantificeren en experimenteel manipuleren.

A.H. Jelle Loonstra, Mo A. Verhoeven, Adam Zbyryt, Ester Schaaf, Christiaan Both, and Theunis Piersma "Individual Black-Tailed Godwits Do Not Stick to Single Routes: A Hypothesis on How Low Population Densities Might Decrease Social Conformity," Ardea 107(3), 251-261, (22 January 2020). https://doi.org/10.5253/arde.v107i3.a11
Received: 17 April 2019; Accepted: 1 November 2019; Published: 22 January 2020
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top