Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 October 2007 Density, Habitat Selection and Breeding Success of an Insular Population of Barbary Falcon Falco Peregrinus Pelegrinoides
Beneharo Rodríguez, Manuel Siverio, Airam Rodríguez, Felipe Siverio
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We studied density, habitat selection and reproduction of Barbary Falcons Falco peregrinus pelegrinoides on Tenerife Island during 2004 and 2005. A total of 26 breeding pairs were counted, all of them occupying natural cliffs around the island. Density observed was 1.27 pairs/100 km2, and was positively correlated with cliff availability. Mean distance between neighbouring pairs was 5869 ± 3338 m, ranging from 1388–13 610 m; in some areas this value was as low as 2062 ± 673 m. Tenerife still shows potential for further increase regarding the observations of single females and the availability of potentially suitable but unoccupied cliffs. Falcons selected taller cliffs, more apart from roads and houses, near the coast, with lower presence of cultivated and urban areas, and associated with other cliff-nesting species. Stepwise discriminant analysis of habitat selection selected cliff height, nearest neighbour distance and distance to road, and correctly classified 71.1% of the cases. Productivity averaged 1.55 fledged young/pair and breeding success was 81.1%. No correlations were observed between habitat features and productivity. Since most territories are located in protected zones and human disturbance seems to be absent, special management measures are not necessary. However, further study into the biology of this population is required for effective and timely conservation of this species if need be.

INTRODUCTION

The breeding range of Barbary Falcon Falco peregrinus pelegrinoides generally comprises arid environments from the Canary Islands and western Morocco eastwards across scattered areas of North Africa, the Middle East and some parts of central Asia (Ferguson-Lees & Christie 2001). This raptor is either considered a subspecies of the cosmopolitan Peregrine Falcon F. peregrinus (Brosset 1986, Del Hoyo et al. 1994, Wink & Seibold 1996) or an independent species (Cramp & Simmons 1980, Clark & Shirihai 1995). It shows characteristic plumage patterns and morphometric differences with respect to Peregrine subspecies, but genetic variation is quite low in the peregrinus/pelegrinoides group (Wink et al. 2000). Although the Canarian breeding falcons mainly show the Barbary phenotype, haplotypes of both F. peregrinus brookei and F. p. pelegrinoides are present according to a preliminary study carried out in Fuerteventura (Amengual et al. 1996).

According to the last available estimate, around 75 pairs breed in the Canary Islands, where all islands are occupied (Siverio & Conception 2003). Until the end of the 1980s, its presence and reproduction were only confirmed for some localities on the eastern Canary Islands (Hernández et al. 1991). Since then, its known breeding distribution has expanded to the rest of the islands (Delgado et al. 1999, Martín & Lorenzo 2001) and some aspects of its breeding biology have been studied (Delgado et al. 1999). In Tenerife its presence was mentioned in the past by Meade-Waldo (1893) and Thanner (1909), but the first breeding record was obtained as late as June 1991 (Hernández et al. 1992).

The density and breeding habitat of F. peregrinus have been studied extensively (Gainzarain et al. 2000, Jenkins 2000a, Sergio et al. 2004, Wightman & Fuller 2005). However, little is known about the distribution pattern of Barbary Falcon elsewhere, and no quantitative studies on breeding habitat preferences exist, save for El Hierro (Rodriguez & Siverio 2006).

The principal aims of the current study are: i) to analyse distribution pattern and density of breeding pairs of Barbary Falcon on Tenerife Island in relation to breeding habitat selection, and ii) to estimate breeding success and its relationship with habitat characteristics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study area

The Canary Islands are a volcanic archipelago, which is located 100 km off the Atlantic coast of north-west Africa (27°37′–29°25′N and 13°20′– 18°19′W), comprising seven major islands with some small islets and rocks. The island of Tenerife is the larger one (2034 km2 and 3718 m a.s.l.), and it is situated in the central part of the archipelago. Vegetation and landscape are influenced by north-easterly humid winds, altitude and orientation. Lower altitude coastal zones of the island are covered by sparse and xeric vegetation dominated by several succulent shrubs species (Fig. 1). Different types of forest associated with local climate (thermophilous, laurel and pine woods) appear at altitudes between 300 and 2000 m. In the central higher altitude part of the island some endemic shrub species dominate the landscape (Morales & Pérez 2000, Fig. 1). Tenerife has approximately 800 000 inhabitants, the majority of which are concentrated along the coast (Morales & Pérez 2000).

Field procedures

During the breeding seasons (February–May) of 2004 and 2005, suitable cliffs were inspected in search of established pairs. The locations of some pairs were already known before the current study commenced (in this sense, some nest data presented in this work refer to the period 1992– 2005). Observation points and transects on foot were used to pinpoint for each pair the breeding cliff and nest site. The presence of an established pair was assumed when displaying or perched adults were present, and the nest site, recently used perches on cliffs, territorial defensive behaviour and/or juveniles were also recorded. Wherever possible, each occupied territory was checked at least three times (prelaying, incubation and chick-rearing periods) to determine the breeding outcome.

Territories of Common Buzzard Buteo buteo, Osprey Pandion haliaetus and Raven Corvus corax, all three potential competitors for nest sites, were noted during field observations, in addition to data collected during previous investigations on these species (Siverio 2006, authors unpubl. data).

Figure 1.

Different breeding habitats of Barbary Falcon on Tenerife Island: A) sea cliffs of Teno massif in the northwest of the island, B) rock faces and lava fields above 2000 m altitude in the Teide National Park.

f01_213.eps

Data analysis

Territory dispersion was estimated by means of the G-Statistic, the ratio between geometric and arithmetic means of the squared nearest-neighbour distances (NND, Table 1). Values approaching 1 (>0.65) indicate a high degree of regularity, and those close to 0 randomness (Brown 1975). Deviation from randomness toward regularity of nest spacing was evaluated by means of the test proposed by Clark & Evans (1954).

Table 1.

Variables used in the description of habitat and nests of the Barbary Falcon on Tenerife Island.

t01_213.gif

To evaluate the effect of cliff availability, forested areas and human occupation on density, a Spearman's rank coefficient was calculated between the number of pairs present in each 10-km UTM (Universal Transverse Mercator) square and the percentage of forest land, cliff availability and dispersion of centres of human occupation. These variables were obtained by dividing the 10-km square into cells of 1×1 km (in the cases of coastal areas, cells consisting of sea were not considered), and noting the proportion of these with cliffs, forest and human centres (see Gainzarain et al. 2000 for similar procedure).

Twenty variables were used to describe nesting cliffs and surrounding areas, and to quantify interspecific competition (Table 1). These variables were measured in the field using GIS aerial photographs or 1: 25 000 scale maps. Only the most recently used sites were considered in the statistical analysis. The same variables were measured in twenty-six randomly chosen, apparently suitable cliffs (≥ 50 m in height, vertical, dominant cliff with crevices or ledges adequate for breeding), unoccupied by falcons. To avoid the effect of intraspecific competition, unoccupied crags had to be more than 1 km away from the nearest established falcon pairs (consistent with the approximate minimum distance recorded between occupied nests in the same year).

Table 2.

Mean values (± SD) of variables measured at territories of Barbary Falcon, and at unoccupied cliffs on Tenerife Island. Statistical results of univariate tests between the two samples (a t-test; b t-test carried out on the log transformed variable; c U-test; d t-test carried out on the variable arcsin transformed; e % of occupied and unoccupied sites with the presence of other species, climbing equipment or inside a natural protected area, in this case, differences tested by means of a G-test on the count data; significance level: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01).

t02_213.gif

Variables for occupied and unoccupied cliffs were compared using t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test or G-test (Table 2). For t-tests, some variables were log-transformed to reduce the effects of non-normal distributions, as identified by KolmogorovSmirnov tests. To understand habitat selection by falcons, the same variables (excluding PRESBUTEO, PRESPAN, PRESCOR, PROTAREA and CLIMBING; see Table 1) were employed in a stepwise discriminant analysis (Fisher's Linear Discriminant Functions). A 5% level of significance was specified for including variables in each step of the analysis. To test the validity of the model cross validation was employed.

To describe nest sites five variables were used (Table 1). In addition to nests located during the study period, all known nest sites used by falcons during 1992–2005 in an intensively controlled area (Teno massif, northwest of the island; M. Siverio unpubl. data) were also considered.

Breeding success was calculated as the percentage of successful pairs (at least one fledged young) from the total number of pairs checked during the incubation period (n = 16 in 2004, and n = 21 in 2005). Productivity and fledging rate were calculated as the number of young fledged per territorial and successful pair, respectively. Potential differences in breeding success among years were tested by means of the G-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. Wherever possible fledged young were sexed according to size differences (females larger than males). Spearman's coefficient correlation analysis was employed to determinate the effect of habitat variables on breeding performance, first separately for each year, then pooled for all breeding attempts, using mean values of productivity for pairs that were observed in both years.

Means and parameter estimates are reported together with standard deviations. All statistical calculations were carried out using SPSS (version 12.0) statistical package and statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Density

A total of 26 breeding pairs of falcons, showing field characteristics of Barbary, were recorded in Tenerife occupying natural cliffs. Also, two single females were recorded holding territories, and pairs or single birds were observed in some unoccupied sites that were potentially suitable for breeding; these were omitted from the present analysis. Total density on the entire island was 1.27 pairs/100 km2. Mean distance between neighbouring pairs was 5869 ± 3338 m, ranging from 1388–13 610 m. In some areas, such as Teno massif (Fig. 1), this distance was as small as 2062 ± 673 m (n = 7 pairs). The G-statistic value (0.52) indicated a non-regular dispersion of breeding territories. However the spacing pattern of territories deviated from randomness toward regularity (z = 3.19, P < 0.005).

Figure 2.

Relationship between the number of Barbary Falcon pairs and cliff availability (expresed as percentage of 1×1 km squares with presence of cliffs) in the UTM squares of 10×10 km of Tenerife Island.

f02_213.eps

Number of breeding pairs in each 10 km-square ranged between 0 and 5. Only one variable (cliff availability) of the three considered was significantly correlated with falcon density (rs = 0.629, n = 34, P < 0.001; Fig. 2).

Habitat selection

Only large and natural cliffs, both in coastal and inland areas, were used by falcons in Tenerife. Mean altitude (measured on the top of the cliffs) of falcon territories was 697.6 m (median 425 m; range 75–2250 m). Only two pairs, located in the Teide National Park, occupied crags at an altitude in excess of 2000 m (Fig. 1).

Significant differences between occupied and unoccupied crags were detected in eight variables (Table 2). Falcons clearly selected taller cliffs, farther apart from roads and houses, near the coast and with a lower presence of human-transformed areas. Furthermore, the presence of other cliffnesting species (such as Osprey and Raven) was significantly different between occupied and unoccupied sites by falcons. In addition, the falcons tended to use only more sheltered orientations (southwest-facing) for nests and cliffs (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Slope aspect of cliffs and nest sites considered in the present study (A = unoccupied cliffs, B = occupied cliffs, C = nest sites).

f03_213.eps

Table 3.

Coefficients of the Fisher's Linear Discriminant Functions obtained for the occupied and unoccupied cliffs by Barbary Falcons on Tenerife Island, and percentages of correct cliff classifications according to the model (n = number of cliffs).

t03_213.gif

Table 4.

Physical characteristics of nests of Barbary Falcon found on Tenerife Island during 1991–2005.

t04_213.gif

Four variables were selected for the discriminant analysis: LogHEIGHT, NND, LogDISTHOUSE and Arcsin%FOREST (Table 3). The percentage of correctly classified cliffs was 75.0% (73.1% and 76.9% for occupied and unoccupied, respectively). The robustness of the model was shown after using cross validation as it correctly classified approximately the same percentages of cliffs (Table 3).

All nests were located opportunistically in barren cavities (61.5%) or on ledges (34.6%), except one which was located in an old Raven nest (Table 4). No differences were found between sheltered (orientation index values 4–5), neutral (3) or exposed (1–2) nests to dominant winds in comparison with a random distribution (G2 = 2.486, P = 0.288). Maximum altitude and height for all known nests were 2150 m and 387 m, respectively. Nests were usually placed in the upper half of the cliff, with a mean height of 142 m from the base of the cliff (Table 4). During the period 1992–2005, seven intensively monitored pairs in the northwest of the island used on average 2.86 alternative nests (range 1–5).

Breeding success

Breeding output was similar in 2004 and 2005 (Table 5), with a mean productivity of 1.55 and a fledging rate of 1.76 over the two years combined. Average breeding success was 81.1%, and no significant differences were found between years in breeding success (G = 0.784, P = 0.376) or fledging rate (U = 110.0, P = 0.438).

In 2004, negative relationships were detected between fledging rate and three habitat variables (n = 13): HEIGHT (rs = - 0.759, P < 0.05), STEPNESS (rs = - 0.639, P < 0.05) and ORI (rs = - 0.720, P < 0.05). In the same year a positive relationship was found between productivity and % FOREST (rs = 0.627, P < 0.05). In contrast, during 2005, or when data were pooled, no significant relations were detected between productivity and the variables employed to describe habitat features. A total of 28 fledged young were sexed and no differences were found in sex ratio (14 males and 14 females).

Table 5.

Breeding parameters of Barbary Falcon on Tenerife Island during 2004–2005

t05_213.gif

DISCUSSION

Previous research on Barbary Falcon has mainly been focused on field identification and taxonomic status (Brosset 1986, Clark & Shirihai 1995, Wink & Seibold 1996, Schollaert & Gilles 2000, Wink et al. 2000, Corso 2001). In general, very little is known about its biology worldwide (Dementiev 1957, Hogg 1983, Delgado et al. 1999, Brouwer & Mullié 2000, Ming et al. 2003). Traditionally it has been considered a desert form of the Peregrine (Cramp & Simmons 1980, Ferguson-Lees & Christie 2001).

In the Canary Islands this falcon was very rare in past decades (Bannerman 1963), but a substantial increase in population size has occurred in the entire archipelago in the last 15 years (Delgado et al. 1999, Siverio & Concepción 2003). On Tenerife, a 20% mean annual increase has been estimated over the last 14 years (Hernández et al. 1991, present study). Most European Peregrine populations are currently recovering from the collapse induced by bioaccumulation of toxic organochlorines via prey species, and recently their numbers appear secure again in the major part of their distribution range (Ratcliffe 1997). Although no precise data are available for the Canaries, current legal status, hunting regulation on wild birds and the high number of feral pigeons and doves supposedly play an important role in the population increase. The present density in Tenerife appears to be similar to other healthy Peregrine populations worldwide (Ratcliffe 1962, Olsen & Olsen 1988, Pepler et al. 1991, Carlier 1993, Ratcliffe 1993, Norris 1995, Gainzarain et al. 2000, Zuberogoitia et al. 2002), and to Barbary Falcon populations elsewhere in the Canaries (Rodriguez & Siverio 2006). The observations of solitary females holding territories and the similarity between occupied and unoccupied sites indicate the potential for further increase.

Our results confirm that Barbary Falcons prefer high cliffs in Tenerife, such as for example Teno massif (Fig. 1), where also breed an important Raven population and all Osprey pairs of the island (Siverio 2006, authors unpubl. data). However, in the eastern Canary Islands, where large cliffs are scarcer than on western islands, breeding pairs are also observed at small and accessible hills situated in wide lava fields (B. Rodriguez unpubl. data). In general, Peregrines prefer large cliffs situated in areas with short vegetations and far away from human population centres; density and distribution are closely related to cliff availability (Donázar et al. 1989, Jenkins 1994, Gainzarain et al. 2002). Heights of cliffs used by Peregrines vary according to their availability, showing a preference for higher, more dominant locations with respect to the surrounding area (Pepier et al. 1991, Ratcliffe 1993, Gainzarain et al. 2000). This fact is positively related with breeding success and foraging efficiency (Mearns & Newton 1988, Jenkins 2000b).

There is no simple explanation for the fact that productivity in our study area was negatively related to cliff height, sheltered orientations of cliff faces and ruggedness of the nesting area; and positively related to percentage of forested land during 2004. However, it is likely that climatic stability, geologic characteristics of cliffs (an abundance of insulated potential nest sites) and the absence of potential predators may explain some of these findings. The positive correlation with forest cover on the island may be spurious because of the small surface area of forest anyway.

In cold-wet climates, Peregrines actively select sheltered and sun exposed cliff-nest orientations, and the opposite in warm climates (Olsen & Olsen 1989b, Norris 1995, Gainzarain et al. 2000, Jenkins 2000a), and this could be positively related to breeding success (Mearns & Newton 1988, Olsen & Olsen 1989a). In the Canaries, the structural characteristics of cliff faces (an abundance of crevices and ledges for potential nest sites), may explain why only one falcon pair used an old Raven nest. In other regions stick nests represent around 30% of Peregrine nests (Ratcliffe 1993).

Whereas normally areas with a low density of paved road are selected by falcons (Gil-Sánchez 1999, Gainzarain et al. 2000), transformed human areas are also used by Peregrines and Barbary Falcons as breeding, hunting or wintering sites, and many man-made structures are utilized as perching or nesting sites (Ratcliffe 1993, Brouwer & Mullié 2000, Ferguson-Lees & Christie 2001). In Tenerife, Barbary Falcon seem to avoid heavily transformed human areas for breeding, but they commonly hunt over towns and villages and occasionally perch on electricity pylons.

Mean brood size at fledging observed on Tenerife was in the lower range of values reported for Peregrine in European populations; however, breeding success was relatively high (review in Rizzolli et al. 2005). The latter may be related to the stability of a favourable climate and a prolonged breeding season of falcon's prey species on the island (Jenkins 1991, Jenkins & Hockey 2001, Martin & Lorenzo 2001). Adverse weather with snow during the breeding season only rarely occurs at some high altitude nesting cliffs.

Never before — as far as we know — has the density of Barbary Falcons been this high on Tenerife, and some expansion is still possible. The present conservation status seems to be satisfactory, and we found no evidence of severe persecution or disturbance by humans. Falcons, however, occasionally kill racing pigeons, and as pigeon fancying is a popular sport on the island a conflict of interest may arise in the future. General knowledge on the ecology and biology of the Barbary falcon is still incomplete, and further study into diet composition, age structure of the population and survival would improve its conservation status, particularly in aiding early detection of negative population trends (Balbontín et al. 2003, Pandolfi et al. 2004, Rizzolli et al. 2005).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was conducted without any financial support. Special thanks to José Juan Hernández, Javier Martín, Rubén Barone, Fernando Vizcaíno, Aurelio Acevedo, David P. Padilla, Francisco J. Disque, Rut Martínez, Francisco M. González and Tinguaro Montelongo for their help in different ways. Statistical advice was given by Joan Navarro and Juan Domingo Delgado. Alex Brown improved the English version. Valuable comments and corrections on the earlier draft of this manuscript were given by José Antonio Sánchez-Zapata, Juan José Negro and two anonymous referees.

REFERENCES

1.

J. Amengual , P. Heidrich , M. Wink & F. Rodriguez 1996. El complejo Falco peregrinus/F. pelegrinoides en Fuerteventura, islas Canarias: nuevos datos derivados de la secuencia del gen mitocondrial cyt b. XII Jornadas Ornitológicas Españolas. Figueres (Girona). Google Scholar

2.

J. Balbontín , V. Penteriani & M. Ferrer 2003. Variations in the age of the mates as an early warning signal of changes in populations trends? The case of Bonnelli's eagle in Andalusia. Biol. Cons. 109: 417–423. Google Scholar

3.

D.A. Bannerman 1963. The Birds of the Atlantic Islands, Vol. I. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh. Google Scholar

4.

A. Brosset 1986. Les populations du Faucon Pèlerin Falco peregrinus Gmelin en Afrique du Nord: un puzzle zoogéographique. Alauda 54: 1–14. Google Scholar

5.

J. Brouwer & W.C. Mullié 2000. The Barbary Falcon Falco pelegrinoides in the Sahel. Alauda 68: 158–161. Google Scholar

6.

D. Brown 1975. A test of randomness of nest spacing. Wildfowl 26: 102–103. Google Scholar

7.

P. Carlier 1993. Choix des sites de nidification du faucon pèlerin Falco peregrinus brookei dans le Parc Naturel des Sierras Subbeticas Cordobesas. Alauda 61: 111–117. Google Scholar

8.

P.J. Clark & F.C. Evans 1954. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35: 445–453. Google Scholar

9.

W.S. Clark & H. Shirihai 1995. Identification of Barbary Falcon. Birding World 8: 336–343. Google Scholar

10.

S. Cramp & K.E.L. Simmons (eds) 1980 The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Vol. 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google Scholar

11.

A. Corso 2001. Le Faucon de Barbarie Falco pelegrinoides. Status en Europe et critères d'identification. Ornithos 8: 164–175. Google Scholar

12.

Hoyo J. Del , A. Elliot & J. Sargatal (eds) 1994. Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 2. New World Vulture to Guineafowl. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

13.

G. Delgado , D. Conceptión , M. Siverio , E. Hernández , V. Quilis & D. Trujillo 1999. Datos sobre la distribution y biología del Halcón de Berbería (Falco pelegrinoides) en las islas Canarias (Aves: Falconidae). Vieraea 27: 287–298. Google Scholar

14.

G. P. Dementiev 1957. On the Shaheen Falco peregrinus babylonicus. Ibis 99: 477–482. Google Scholar

15.

J.A. Donázar , O. Ceballos & C. Fernández 1989. Factors influencing the distribution and abundance of seven cliff-nesting raptors: a multivariate study. In: B.-U. Meyburg & R.D. Chancellor (eds) Raptors in the Modern World: 545–549. WWGBP, Berlin. Google Scholar

16.

J. Ferguson-Lees & D.A. Christie 2001. Raptors of the World. Christopher Helm, London. Google Scholar

17.

J.A. Gainzarain , R. Arambarri & A.F. Rodríguez 2000. Breeding density, habitat selection and reproductive rates of the Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus in Álava (northern Spain). Bird Study 47: 225–231. Google Scholar

18.

J.A. Gainzarain , R. Arambarri & A.F. Rodriguez 2002. Population size and factors affecting the density of the Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus in Spain. Ardeola 49: 67–74. Google Scholar

19.

J.M. Gil-Sánchez 1999. Solapamiento de hábitat de nidificatión y coexistencia entre el Águila-azor Perdicera (Hieraaetus fasciatus) y el Halcón Peregrino (Falco peregrinus) en un área de simpatría. Ardeola 46: 31–37. Google Scholar

20.

E. Hernández , G. Delgado , J. Carrillo , M. Nogales & V. Quilis 1991. A preliminary census and notes on the distribution of the Barbary Falcon (Falco pelegrinoides) in the Canary Islands. Bonn. Zool. Beitr. 42: 27–34. Google Scholar

21.

E. Hernández , G. Delgado & V. Quilis 1992. El Halcón de Berbería (Falco pelegrinoide), nueva especie nidificante en Tenerife (I. Canarias). Vieraea 21: 170. Google Scholar

22.

P. Hogg 1983. On the Barbary Falcon Falco pelegrinoides in North Eastern Africa. Malimbus 5: 90. Google Scholar

23.

A.R. Jenkins 1991. Latitudinal prey productivity and potential density in the Peregrine Falcon. Gabar 6: 20–24. Google Scholar

24.

A.R. Jenkins 1994. The influence of habitat on the distribution and abundance of Peregrine and Lanner Falcon in South Africa. Ostrich 65: 281–290. Google Scholar

25.

A.R. Jenkins 2000a. Characteristics of Peregrine and Lanner Falcon nesting habitats in South Africa. Ostrich 71: 416–424. Google Scholar

26.

A.R. Jenkins 2000b. Hunting mode and success of African Peregrines Falco peregrinus minor: does nesting habitat quality affect foraging efficiency? Ibis 142: 235–246. Google Scholar

27.

A.R. Jenkins & P.A.R. Hockey 2001. Prey availability influences habitat tolerance: an explanation for the rarity of peregrine falcons in the tropics. Ecography 24: 359–367. Google Scholar

28.

A. Martin & J.A. Lorenzo 2001. Aves del archipiélago canario. Francisco Lemus Editor, La Laguna. Google Scholar

29.

E.G.B. Meade-Waldo 1893. List of Birds observed in the Canary Islands. Ibis 6: 185–207. Google Scholar

30.

R. Mearns & I. Newton 1988. Factors affecting breeding success of Peregrines in South Scotland. J. Anim. Ecol. 57: 903–916. Google Scholar

31.

M.A. Ming , E. Potapov & Y.E. Xiaodi 2003. Breeding ecology of Barbary Falcon Falco pelegrinoides babylonicus in Xinjiang. Sichuan J. Zool. 22: 86–87. Google Scholar

32.

G. Morales & R. Pérez 2000. Gran Atlas temático de Canarias. Editorial Interinsular Canaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife. Google Scholar

33.

D.W. Norris 1995. The 1991 survey and weather impacts on the Peregrine Falco peregrinus breeding population in the Republic of Ireland. Bird Study 42: 20–30. Google Scholar

34.

P.D. Olsen & J. Olsen 1988. Breeding of the Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus: I. Weather, nest spacing and territory occupancy. Emu 88: 195–201. Google Scholar

35.

P.D. Olsen & J. Olsen 1989a. Breeding of the Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus: II. Weather, nest quality and the timing of egg laying. Emu 89: 1–5. Google Scholar

36.

P.D. Olsen & J. Olsen 1989b. Breeding of the Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus: III. Weather, nest quality and breeding success. Emu 89: 6–14. Google Scholar

37.

M. Pandolfi , G. Gaibani & A. Tanferna 2004. Depicts the number of breeding pairs reliably the status of Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus populations? Ardea 92: 247–251. Google Scholar

38.

D. Pepler , H.J. van Hensbergen & R. Martin 1991. Breeding density and nest site characteristics of the Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus minor in the southwestern Cape, South Africa. Ostrich 62: 23–28. Google Scholar

39.

D.A. Ratcliffe 1962. Breeding density in the Peregrine Falco peregrinus and Raven Corvus corax. Ibis 104: 13–39. Google Scholar

40.

D.A. Ratcliffe 1993. The Peregrine Falcon. Poyser, London. Google Scholar

41.

D.A. Ratcliffe 1997. Peregrine Falcon. In: W.J.M. Hagemeier & M.J. Blair (eds) The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds, their Distribution and Abundance: 192–193. Poyser, London. Google Scholar

42.

F. Rizzolli , F. Sergio , L. Marchesi & P. Pedrini 2005. Density, productivity, diet and population status of the Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus in the Italian Alps. Bird Study 52: 188–192. Google Scholar

43.

B. Rodriguez & M. Siverio 2006. Density and habitat characteristics of an insular population of Barbary Falcon Falco peregrinus pelegrinoides (El Hierro, Canary Islands). Ardeola 53: 325–331. Google Scholar

44.

V. Schollaert & W. Gilles 2000. Taxonomy of the peregrine Falco peregrinus/Barbary falcon F. (peregrinus) pelegrinoides complex in Morocco. Bull. ABC 7: 101–103. Google Scholar

45.

F. Sergio , F. Rizolli , L. Marchesi & P. Pedrini 2004. The importance of interspecific interactions for breedingsite selection: peregrine falcons seek proximity of raven nests. Ecography 27: 818–826. Google Scholar

46.

M. Siverio 2006. Population status and breeding biology of Osprey Pandion haliaetus in Tenerife, Canary Islands (1997–2004). Alauda 74: 413–419. Google Scholar

47.

M. Siverio & D. Conceptión 2003. Halcón Tagarote Falco pelegrinoides. In: R. Martí & J.C. del Moral (eds) Atlas de las Aves Reproductoras en España: 206–207. Directión General de Conservatión de la Naturaleza — Sociedad Española de Ornitología, Madrid. Google Scholar

48.

R.V. Thanner 1909. Falco barbants auf Tenerife. Orn. Jah. 20: 148–150. Google Scholar

49.

C.S. Wightman & M.R. Fuller 2005. Spacing and physical habitat selection patterns of peregrine falcons in Central West Greenland. Wilson Bull. 117: 226–236. Google Scholar

50.

M. Wink & I. Seibold 1996. Molecular phylogeny of mediterranean raptors (Families Accipitridae and Falconidae). In: J. Muntaner & J. Mayol (eds) Biology and conservation of the Mediterranean raptors, 1994: 335–344. Monografías, no 4, SEO, Madrid. Google Scholar

51.

M. Wink , H. Döttlinger , M.K. Nicholls & H. Sauer-Gürth 2000. Phylogenetic relationships between Black Shaheen Falco peregrinus peregrinator, Red-naped Shaheen F. pelegrinoides babylonicus and Peregrines F. peregrinus. In: R.D. Chancellor & B.-U. Meyburg (eds) Raptors at Risk: 853–857. WWGBP/Hancock House, Berlin, London and Paris. Google Scholar

52.

I. Zuberogoitia , J.F. Ruiz & J.J. Torres 2002. El Halcón Peregrino. Diputación Foral de Bizkaia, Bizkaia. Google Scholar

Appendices

SAMENVATTING

Hoewel de meningen over de soortspecifieke status van de Barbarijsche Slechtvalk onder taxonomen en cladisten nog steeds uiteenlopen, wel of niet een soort, is de biologie van deze aan de Slechtvalk Falco peregrinus verwante soort siecht bekend. Dat Staat in schril contrast met de Slechtvalk zelf, die overal ter wereld uitputtend is onderzocht. In deze Studie worden dichtheid en habitatkeus op Tenerife bekeken, het grootste van de Canarische eilanden op 100 km voor de kust van NW-Afrika. Deze vulkanische rotsklomp is ruim 2000 km2 groot en herbergde in de middenjaren 2000 — naast 800 000 mensen — 26 paren en enkele ongepaarde territoriale vrouwtjes. De valken nestelden op natuurlijke kliffen, met een gemiddelde afstand tot het dichtstbijzijnde buurpaar van ruim 5800 m (lokaal, zoals in het Teno massief, echter slechts 2062 m). De valken hadden een voorkeur voor hoge kliffen gericht naar het zuidwesten. Daarentegen werden gebieden met menselijke activiteiten juist gemeden als broedplaats, zij het dat ze in die gebieden wel jagend werden waargenomen. De productiviteit lag met gemiddeld 1,55 jongen per paar aan de lage kant van de spreiding bij Slechtvalken; daarentegen was maar liefst 81% van de paren succesvol. Er werden geen duidelijke verbanden gevonden tussen productiviteit en gemeten habitatvariabelen. Het stabiele klimaat, de aanwezigheid van talrijke goed tegen de zon beschermde nestplekken op de ruige kliffen en de afwezigheid van potentiële predatoren zullen daar mede debet aan zijn. Aangezien nog tal van dergelijke nestplekken onbezet zijn, of door een ongepaard vrouwtje werden geclaimd, is er potentie voor verdere uitbreiding. Conflicten met mensen zijn vooralsnog niet aan de orde. Het vliegen met Postduiven Columba livia is echter een populaire sport op Tenerife, en dat zou op termijn tot vervolging kunnen leiden als de valken vaker postduiven gaan vangen. (RGB)

Beneharo Rodríguez, Manuel Siverio, Airam Rodríguez, and Felipe Siverio "Density, Habitat Selection and Breeding Success of an Insular Population of Barbary Falcon Falco Peregrinus Pelegrinoides," Ardea 95(2), 213-223, (1 October 2007). https://doi.org/10.5253/078.095.0205
Received: 12 November 2006; Accepted: 1 August 2007; Published: 1 October 2007
KEYWORDS
Canary Islands
density
Falco peregrinus pelegrinoides
habitat selection
reproduction
Tenerife
Back to Top