Translator Disclaimer
1 April 2008 Nest Site Selection and Breeding Success in an Expanding Species, the Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis
Abdelkrim Si Bachir, Christophe Barbraud, Salaheddine Doumandji, Heinz Hafner
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Native to the Indo-African area, the Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis is now a cosmopolitan species, still in great range expansion. The factors affecting breeding success of the species remain however poorly known, and here we investigate the breeding biology of the Cattle Egret in a new breeding population in the Soummam Valley (Petite Kabylie, Algeria). The installation chronology and nest site selection are described, and their effect on breeding success investigated. The nesting season lasted generally from the end of March to the end of July. Clutch size, number of hatched chicks and breeding success were low compared to other breeding areas in the Mediterranean. The first Cattle Egrets arriving at the colony in March selected the highest trees and the highest nest supports close to the trunk. With new arrivals during the course of the season, a gradual decrease was observed in the height of the nests which were progressively built away from the trunk. This selective behaviour allowed the first installed pairs to have a better breeding success. This phenomenon is discussed here within the framework of territoriality and the breeding advantages of being high ranking in the ‘territorial hierarchy’ for the individual.

INTRODUCTION

The Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis is a species of Indo-African origin which has become globally-distributed in recent times. Its progress was accentuated considerably during the last half-century not only by extension in range but also by local increases in number (Bredin 1983, Hafner 1994, Kushlan & Hafner 2000). Hancock & Kushlan (1989) reported that the northern boundary of the species' distribution is around 45°N in North America and Eurasia, and that the southernmost latitude is between 35 and 40°S. This southern limit recently extended south to the Falkland Islands and Tierra de Fuego as far as 55°S (Morales in Kushlan & Hafner 2000). In the Mediterranean region, in particular the Western half, the distribution and size of the breeding populations has made great strides since the 1980s (Kushlan & Hafner 2000). In Algeria until the 18th century, the species only bred in the lakes of Fetzara and Halloula (the extreme North-East) and perhaps elsewhere in the Tell (Heim de Balsac & Mayaud 1962, Etchecopar & Hue 1964). More recently, the species has become a numerous breeder in several areas, in particular in Tizi Ouzou, Bouira, Jijel, Béjaia, in Constantinois and on the High Plateaux, M'sila (Moali & Isenmann 1993, Moali 1999, Isenmann & Moali 2000, Boukhemza 2000, Si Bachir et al. 2000, Si Bachir 2005). In these areas the species is partly migratory with regional movements during the non-breeding period (Isenmann & Moali 2000, Si Bachir 2005).

Despite its range expansion, the breeding biology of this invasive species remains poorly known. The choice of nest site by the Cattle Egret has not been examined in detail (Ranglack et al. 1991, Parejo & Sanchez-Guzman 1999), although colony selection by several other species of tree-nesting herons has been studied (Valverde 195556, Thompson 1977, Hafner 1982, Erwin et al. 1987, Gibbs et al. 1987, Fasola & Alieri 1992, Hafner & Fasola 1992, Dami et al. 2006).

The Cattle Egret nested for the first time at our study site in the Soummam valley (Kabylie, Algeria) in 1993. The regular occupation of this colony since this date gave us the opportunity to study some aspects of the breeding biology of the species. The first aim of the present study is to describe the installation chronology and breeding biology of the species. Then, we investigated factors involved in nest site selection. Finally, we studied the effect of the installation period and nest site position on the breeding parameters.

METHODS

Study site

The colony was located 2 km east of the village of El Kseur (36°41′N, 04°51′E) and 20 km west of Bé jaia town, in the lower Soummam valley, at 55 m above sea level. The area comprises part of the subwet Mediterranean bioclimatic stage with hot winters (Stewart 1969). The colony was established 300 m north of the Soummam River on 8 to 16 m tall Ash Fraxinus angustifolia trees. The trunks of trees supporting nests were 2 to 4 m high with a diameter ranging from 0.25 to 0.8 m. The ash trees were alongside national road N26 forming a well sheltered wood in association with Plane Platanus orientalis, Eucalyptus Eucalyptus rostrata, and Mastic Pistacia lentisticus. Heavy road traffic restricted pedestrian passage. The understory of the wood was little diversified and largely open. The colony was also girdled by two wind breaks of Cypress Cupressus macrocarpa in the South and Eucalyptus Eucalyptus sempervirens in the North. Adjacent to the site were cereal fields, market-gardening, orchards and a railway.

In 1997, the single monospecific colony under study was in high Ash trees, and counted ten pairs at the first installation. It has been occupied regularly since and comprised more than eight hundred pairs in 1999 (Si Bachir et al. 2000) confirming the dynamic nature of the species in Algeria (Ledant et al. 1981, Isenmann & Moali 2000) and in North Africa (Rencurel 1972, Franchimont 1986, Kushlan & Hafner 2000).

Data collection

Researchers generally desist from exploring a colony at the start of its establishment for fear of disturbance because disastrous effects by human intrusion have been documented (Dusi & Dusi 1968, Tremblay & Ellison 1979, Utschick 1983, Drapeau et al. 1984, Parnell et al. 1988, Frederick & Collopy 1989). However, the reaction of Ardeidae to human disturbance is correlated to the habitat structure (Vos et al. 1985, Rodgers & Smith 1995). The colony studied was characterized by trees from 8 to 16 m in height. Nests were placed at a height of 4 to 15 m. These conditions offered security to the herons and permitted study with some precautionary measures during intrusion into the site (Si Bachir et al. 2000).

Nest installation chronology and nest contents were followed in 1997, 1998 and 1999 during weekly visits. Observations were carried out from the first nest building to the end of the breeding season. For a total of 1981 nests monitored during the 3 breeding seasons (511 in 1997, 665 in 1998 and 805 in 1999), we noted for every new nest the vertical position (the height of the colonized tree and the height of the nest) using marks placed beforehand on the trunk of trees (0.5 m precision). The horizontal position of nests was defined according to Hafner (1977): (1) against the trunk, (2) on solid branches with vertical structure, (3) on secondary branches in the periphery of the tree or (4) in the extreme periphery.

The status and contents of a total of 210 marked nests selected randomly in the colony (64 in 1997, 82 in 1998 and 64 in 1999) were recorded: nest site position (horizontal and vertical), egg number and/or chick number. Visits to the colony took place in the morning, between 06:00 and 09:00 h by a maximum of two people to limit disturbance. Nest contents were recorded using a pole equipped with a mirror at the top.

The breeding biology data (clutch size, hatched chicks per nest, fledged chicks per nest) and losses of eggs and young chicks (up to 20 days) were expressed by means and proportions in order to compare them with other studies. Because chicks after 20–25 days old leave the nest and wander in the colony, the term fledged chicks designate chicks' age up to 20–25 days old. The breeding success was expressed as the ratio of the total number of fledglings (20–25 days old) to the total number of eggs incubated (Hafner 1977, Franchimont 1985).

Data analysis

We used GLM (generalized linear models) (Mc Cullagh & Neider 1989) to test for the effects of installation period, tree height, nest height, and nest horizontal position on reproductive parameters. Because tree height and nest height were highly correlated (r = 0.803, n = 1981, P < 0.001) we chose not to include tree height as an explanatory variable. Despite some interannual differences in reproductive parameters (see Results) we decided not to include year as an explanatory variable because our primary interest was to investigate overall effects of nest site selection on reproductive parameters across years, and to increase sample sizes so as to avoid over parameterization of the models. For clutch size, number of hatched chicks and number of fledged chicks we used a normal distribution and a log link. For breeding success we used a Poisson distribution and a log link. The goodness of fit of each model was assessed using the ratio χ2/df (dispersion parameter ĉ), and we corrected for over dispersion when necessary. We used a backward selection procedure starting from the more complex model with single effects and their interactions, and removing at each step the least significant effect until no effect could be removed. When main effects were not retained, interaction terms including the main effect were not retained. The height in meters of the nest and the parameters of the breeding biology are regarded as continuous variables. The horizontal position was allocated a scale from 1 to 4 from the nearest position to the trunk until the periphery of the tree (see above). The period of installation was noted in ten-day periods counted from 1 March: 25 for the last decade of March, 35 for the first decade of April, etc. In 1998, the breeding season was prolonged to September but because these nests were exceptionally late the records were excluded from statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Installation chronology

In the Soummam valley, the first nests under construction were observed on 28 March 1997, 22 March 1998 and 26 March 1999. The peak of installation occurred between 11 April and 10 May. Nest building ended generally at the end of June. In 1998, the colony was completely deserted towards the end of July, but 48 pairs started breeding again in September (Fig. 1). In 1999, the nest installation ended at the beginning of May when we noted a new colony installed on Eucalyptus in the centre of the El-Kseur (approximately 2 km to the west of the studied colony). The number of pairs increased from 511 in 1997, 665 in 1998 to 805 in 1999.

The clutch size increased from one year to the next, with an overall mean of 2.92 over the 3 study years (Table 1). The mean number of hatched chicks was 2.22, the number of fledgings per nest was 1.85 and the breeding success was 0.63. The nests contained one to five eggs, with 53.8% of the nests containing three eggs. One nest contained an exceptional number of seven eggs, although the eggs may have been laid by two females. Losses were generally more important at the egg stage than during chick rearing. The highest breeding success was in 1998 (0.82; Table 1).

Figure 1.

Chronology of nest installation during the breeding seasons 1997, 1998 and 1999.

f01_99.eps

Table 1.

Annual breeding parameters of an Algerian colony of Cattle Egrets during 1997–99. (A) Distribution (%) of clutch sizes, (B) percentage of losses, (C) mean number of hatched and fledged chicks per nest, and breeding success by year.

t01_99.gif

Losses were primarily due to eggs and chicks falling from the nest because of strong winds. Particularly notable was the Sirocco, a southern wind in summer, accompanied by temperatures higher than 30°C which often occurred between May and July in 1997 and 1999. This was the most likely origin of the important losses recorded in these two years (Table 1). We also recorded a large variety of predators, both aerial (Common Raven Corvus corax) and terrestrial (Red Fox Vulpes vulpes, Wildcat Felis sylvestris, Weasel Mustela nivalis, Common Genet Genetta genetta, Montpellier Snake Malpolon monspessulanus and Ocellated Lizard Lacerta lepida), each with the potential to depredate on eggs and young chicks. Some of these predators could enter the nests (e.g. Montpellier Snake) and others could scavenge under the nests for chicks that fell out of the nests.

Nest site selection and breeding parameters

The first pairs initiated their nests high in the trees and close to the trunk, whereas later nests were initiated lower and further away from the trunk (Table 2, Fig. 2A–C).

Table 2.

Parameter estimates of the effect of installation period on horizontal nest site position in an Algerian population of Cattle Egrets (n = 1981). Goodness of fit: ĉ = 11.863.

t02_99.gif

Figure 2.

Nest site selection in an Algerian population of Cattle Egrets. (A) height of the tree, (B) height of the nest, (C) horizontal position, and (D) breeding success according to date of the built nests. Bars indicate standard errors.

f02_99.eps

Clutches laid early in the breeding season were larger than late clutches (Table 3). Hatching success was affected by nest position, with nests situated further away from the trunk hatching less chicks (Table 3). Nests situated close to the trunk fledged a higher number of chicks (Table 3). The interaction between nest position and installation period affected the number of chicks fledged, which decreased as the installation period increased for nests situated close to the trunk, but not for nests situated further away from the trunk (Table 3). None of the parameters affected the breeding success (Table 3).

This demonstrated that the first pairs showed a preference for the more protected positions (on the highest trees, with the highest position and nearest to the trunk) and fledged the highest number of chicks.

Table 3.

Estimates of effects of installation period and horizontal nest site position on reproductive parameters of Cattle Egrets (n = 210). Goodness of fit tests: clutch size (ĉ = 0.687), hatched chicks (ĉ = 1.188), fledged chicks (ĉ = 1.245), breeding success (ĉ = 0.211).

t03_99.gif

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we investigated breeding date and nest site selection and their effect on breeding parameters in a breeding population of Cattle Egret that recently settled in North Africa. Our results showed a strong asynchrony of laying dates. Early breeders selected highest, apparently most favourable, places, and fledged a higher number of chicks.

Comparison with other populations

As shown for other bird species at the intraspecific level (Lack 1968, Farner & King 1971), the breeding season of the Cattle Egret becomes longer closer to the equator compared to higher latitudes. The nesting of Cattle Egrets in the Soummam valley extends for more than four months, from the end of March to the end of July with a higher installation frequency in April–May. Exceptionally, when weather conditions are favourable, a second breeding period can occur in September, as in 1998. In Extremadura (south-western Spain) the nesting period is similar (Parejo et al. 2001). However, in the Camargue (France) and in Albufera de Valencia in Spain, the nesting period is later and shorter. It begins in the second decade of April and lasts until the end of August with a peak of laying similar to that of the Soummam valley (Hafner 1982, Prosper & Hafner 1996).

Herons and egrets exhibit a decrease in clutch size with latitude (Jenni 1969, Custer & Osborn 1977, Pratt & Winkler 1985, Arendt & Arendt 1988, Ranglack et al. 1991), and our results fit within this general pattern. However, the average clutch size is relatively low (2.92 eggs per nest) compared to other populations. Darmallah (1989) noted an average of 3.34 eggs per nest in El Kala (Algeria), which is at the same latitude as El Kseur (36°N). Hafner (1980) and Prosper & Hafner (1996) recorded average clutch sizes of 4.6 (at 46°N) and 4.23 (at 39°N). Franchimont (1985) calculated an average clutch size of 3.27 for a colony in Asjène in Morocco (34°N). The small clutch size that we observed may be a founder effect, in which the first breeders were inexperienced young birds, because mean clutch size increased during the three year of study.

The average breeding success seems relatively low (0.63) which can be partly explained by the effects of the strong wind. The majority of the recorded losses (totalling 40.5%) was related to the action of the Sirocco which caused eggs and young chicks to be projected out of their nests. After periods of such strong winds, tens of chick corpses and hundreds of broken eggs were found below the nesting trees (Si Bachir 2005). At sites surrounded by water, nests are generally built at lower heights (Hafner 1977, Darmallah 1989, Prosper & Hafner 1996) leading to a breeding success that generally exceeds 65%. However, the breeding success of our study colony was similar to the mean breeding success of other populations where breeding success was measured. The average breeding success of 30 populations was 0.618 ± 0.214, as compiled by Ranglack et al. (1991), Petry & Fonseca (2005), Telfair & Bister (2004), Parejo et al. (2001) and Mora (1991).

Breeding success varied considerably between years. In 1998, we recorded the highest breeding success, and the highest number of fledged chicks per nest, and moreover the species bred during a second period in September–October. The strong precipitation of 1998 (865.2 mm against 504.7 and 506.7 mm in 1997 and 1999, respectively) may have caused this high breeding success.

Effect of timing on nest selection

Our results show that Cattle Egrets preferably choose a nest site on the highest trees, at the highest point and nearest to the trunk. As the breeding season progresses, new birds are constrained to occupy the vacant sites, which are situated lower and further away from the trunks. Nest positions relative to the trunk strongly affected reproductive output. Early breeders are able to choose the most favourable nest positions, which causally links to their higher reproductive output. Similar benefits of nest site quality on reproductive output have been demonstrated for other Ciconiiform populations (Post 1990, Butler 1994). Therefore, positions close to the tree trunks in the heronry may confer benefits to the individuals breeding there independently of their intrinsic condition. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that the observed drop in reproductive success for birds that settle later is associated with a concomitant decline in quality of individuals. Studies using marked individuals would be needed to estimate the relative contribution of these two processes.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are most grateful to Nick Riddiford and Christiaan Both for their comments and language correction on a former version of the paper.

REFERENCES

1.

W.J. Arendt & A.I. Arendt 1988. Aspects of the breeding biology of the Cattle Egret (Bubulcus ibis) in Montserrat, West Indies, and its impact on nest vegetation. Colonial Waterbirds 11: 72–84. Google Scholar

2.

M. Boukhemza 2000. Etude bio-écologique de la Cigogne blanche (Ciconia ciconia L., 1775) et du Héron gardes-bœufs (Bubulcus ibis L., 1775) en Kabylie: Analyse démographique, éthologique et essai d'interprétation des stratégies trophiques. Doctorat thesis, Inst. Nat. Agra., El-Harrach, Algeria. Google Scholar

3.

D. Bredin 1983. Contribution à l'étude écologique d'Ardeola ibis (L.): héron garde-bœufs de Camargue. PhD thesis, Univ. Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France. Google Scholar

4.

R.W. Butler 1994. Population regulation of wading Ciconiiform birds. Colonial Waterbirds 17: 189–199. Google Scholar

5.

T.W. Custer & G. Osborn 1977. Wading birds as biological indicators: 1975 colony survey. US Fish Wildl. Serv., Spec. Sci. Rept., Wildl. No. 206. Google Scholar

6.

L. Dami , R.E. Bennetts & H. Hafner 2006. Do Cattle Egrets exclude Little Egrets from settling at higher quality sites within mixed-species colonies? Waterbirds 29: 154–162. Google Scholar

7.

H. Darmallah 1989. Contribution à l'étude de la reproduction du Héron garde-bœufs (Bubulcus ibis) au niveau du marais de Bou Rdim, Parc National d'El Kala (Algérie). Doctorat thesis, Inst. Nat. Agro., El-Harrach, Algeria. Google Scholar

8.

P.R. Drapeau , R. Mc Neil & J. Burton 1984. Influences du dérangement humain et de l'activité du Cormoran à aigrettes, Phalacrocorax auritus, sur la reproduction du Grand Héron Ardea herodias, aux îles de la Madeleine. Can. Field Nat. 98: 219–222. Google Scholar

9.

J.L. Dusi & R.T. Dusi 1968. Ecological factors contributing to nesting failure in a heron colony. Wilson Bull. 80: 458–466. Google Scholar

10.

M. Erwin , J.A. Spendelow , R.H. Geissler & B.K. Williams 1987. Relationship between nesting populations of wading birds and habitat features along the Atlantic coast. In: W.R. Witman & W.K. Meredith (eds) Waterfowl and Wetlands Symposium. Delaware Department of Natural Resources, pp. 56–57. Google Scholar

11.

R.D. Etchecopar & F. Hue (eds) 1964. Les oiseaux du nord de l'Afrique. Boubée N. & Co, Paris. Google Scholar

12.

D.S. Farner & J.R. King 1971. Avian Biology. Academic press, Vol. 1. New York and London. Google Scholar

13.

M. Fasola & R. Alieri 1992. Conservation of heronry Ardeidae sites in North Italian agricultural landscapes. Biol. Conserv. 62: 219–228. Google Scholar

14.

J. Franchimont 1985. Biologie de la reproduction du héron garde-bœufs (Bubulcus ibis) dans une héronnière mixte du nord-ouest marocain. Aves 22: 225–247. Google Scholar

15.

J. Franchimont 1986. Les causes de l'expansion géographique mondiale du héron garde-bœufs (Bubulcus ibis). Cahiers d'Ethologie Appliquée 66: 373–388. Google Scholar

16.

P.C. Frederick & M.W. Collopy 1989. Research disturbance in colonies of wading birds: effects of frequency of visits and egg-marking on reproductive parameters. Colonial Waterbirds 12: 152–157. Google Scholar

17.

G.P. Gibbs , S. Woodward , M.L. Hunter & A.E. Hutchinson 1987. Determinants of Great-blue Heron colony distribution in coastal Maine. Auk 104: 38–47. Google Scholar

18.

H. Hafher 1977. Contribution à l'étude écologique de quatre espèces de hérons (Egretta g. garzetta L., Ardeola r. ralloïdes Scop., Ardeola i. ibis L., Nycticorax n. nycticorax L.) pendant leur nidification en Camargue. PhD thesis, Univ. Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France. Google Scholar

19.

H. Hafher 1982. Creation of a breeding site for tree-nesting herons in the Camargue, France. In: D. Scott (ed) Manual of active wetland and waterfowl management. IWRB, Slimbridge, UK, pp. 216–220 Google Scholar

20.

H. Hafher 1994. Le Héron garde-boeufs. In: D. Yeatman-Berthelot 1994 (ed) Nouvel atlas des oiseaux nicheurs de France 1985–1989. Société d'Ornithologie, France. Google Scholar

21.

H. Hafner & M. Fasola 1992. The relationship between feeding habitat and colonially nesting Ardeidae. In: C.M. Finlayson , G.E. Hollis & T.J. Davis (eds) Managing Mediterranean wetlands and their birds. IWRB Special Publication 20. Slimbridge, UK, pp. 194–201. Google Scholar

22.

J. Hancock & J.A. Kushlan 1989. Guide des hérons du monde — aigrettes — bihoreaux — butors — hérons — onorés. Delachaux & Niestlé, Paris. Google Scholar

23.

H. Heim de Balsac & N. Mayaud (eds) 1962. Les oiseaux du Nord-ouest de l'Afrique. Paul Le Chevalier, Paris. Google Scholar

24.

P. Isenmann & A. Moali (eds) 2000. The birds of Algeria — Les oiseaux d'Algérie. SEOF, Paris. Google Scholar

25.

D.A. Jenni 1969. A study of the ecology of four species of herons during the breeding season at Lake Alice, Alachua County, Florida. Ecol. Monogr. 39: 243–270. Google Scholar

26.

J.A. Kushlan & H. Hafner (eds) 2000. Heron Conservation. Academic Press, London. Google Scholar

27.

D. Lack 1968. Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Methuen, London. Google Scholar

28.

J.P. Ledant , J.P. Jacob , P. Jacobs , E Malher , B. Ochando & J. Roché 1981. Mise à jour de l'avifaune algérienne. Le Gerfaut 71: 295–398. Google Scholar

29.

P. Mc Cullagh & J. Neider 1989. Generalized linear models. Chapman & Hill, London. Google Scholar

30.

A. Moali 1999. Déterminisme écologique de la distribution et biologie des populations des oiseaux nicheurs en Kabylie. Doctorat thesis, Univ. Mouloud Mameri, Tizi Ouzou, Algeria. Google Scholar

31.

A. Moali & P. Isenmann 1993. Nouvelles données sur la distribution de certaines espèces en Kabylie (Algérie). Alauda 61: 215–218. Google Scholar

32.

M.A. Mora 1991. Organochlorines and breeding success in cattle egrets from the Mexicali Valley, Baje-California, Mexico. Colonial Waterbirds 14: 127–132. Google Scholar

33.

D. Parejo & J.M. Sanchez-Guzman 1999. Effects of agricultural development on colonial ardeid populations in southwestern Spain. Waterbirds 22: 302–306. Google Scholar

34.

D. Parejo , J.M. Sanchez-Guzman & J.M. Aviles 2001. Breeding biology of the Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis in southern Spain. Bird Study 48: 367–372. Google Scholar

35.

J.F. Parnell , D.G. Ainley , H. Blokpoel , B. Cain , T.W. Custer , J.L. Dusi , S. Kress , J.A. Kushlan , W.E. Southern , L.E. Stenzel & B.C. Thompson 1988. Colonial waterbird management in North America. Colonial Waterbirds 11: 129–169. Google Scholar

36.

M.V. Petry & V.S.D. Fonseca 2005. Breeding success of the colonist species Bubulcus ibis (Linnaeus, 1758) and four native species. Acta Zool. 86: 217–221. Google Scholar

37.

W. Post 1990. Nest survival in a large Ibis-Heron colony during a three-year decline extinction. Colonial Waterbirds 13: 50–61. Google Scholar

38.

H.M. Pratt & D.W. Winkler 1985. Clutch size, timing of laying, and reproductive success in a colony of great blue herons and great egrets. Auk 102: 49–63. Google Scholar

39.

J. Prosper & H. Hafner 1996. Breeding aspects of the colonial Ardeidae in the Albufera de Valencia, Spain: Population changes, phenology, and reproductive success of the three most abundant species. Colonial Waterbirds 19 (Special Publication): 98–107. Google Scholar

40.

G.S. Ranglack , R.A. Angus & K.R. Marion 1991. Physical and temporal factors influencing breeding success of Cattle Egret (Bubulcus ibis) in a west Alabama colony. Colonial Waterbirds 14: 140–149. Google Scholar

41.

P. Rencurel 1972. Observations sur la nidification du héron garde-bœufs (Ardeola ibis L.) dans l'île de Bou-Regreg. Alauda 40: 278–286. Google Scholar

42.

J.A. Rodgers & H.T. Smith 1995. Set-back distances to protect nesting birds colonies from human disturbance in Florida. Conserv. Biol. 9: 89–99. Google Scholar

43.

A. Si Bachir 2005. Ecologie du Héron garde-bœufs, Bubulcus ibis ibis (Linné, 1758), dans la région de Béjaia (Kabylie de la Soummam, Algérie) et suivi de son expansion en Algérie. PhD thesis, Univ. Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France. Google Scholar

44.

A. Si Bachir , H. Hafner , J.N. Tourenq & S. Doumandji 2000. Structure de l'habitat et biologie de reproduction du Héron garde bœufs, Bubulcus ibis, dans une colonie de la vallée de la Soummam (Petite Kabylie, Algérie). Rev. Ecol. Terre Vie 55: 33–43. Google Scholar

45.

P. Stewart 1969. Quotient pluviométrique et dégradation biosphérique. Bull. Doc. Hist. Nat. Agra.: 24–25. Google Scholar

46.

P.C. Telfair & T.J. Bister 2004. Long-term breeding success of the cattle egret in Texas. Waterbirds 27: 69–78. Google Scholar

47.

D.H. Thompson 1977. Declines in populations of colonial waterbirds nesting within the floodplain of the upper Mississippi River. Proc. Colon. Waterbirds Group 1: 26–37. Google Scholar

48.

J. Tremblay & L.N. Ellison 1979. Effects of human disturbance on breeding of Black-crowned Night herons. Auk 96: 364–369. Google Scholar

49.

H. Utschick 1983. Abwehrstrategie und Abwehrmassnahmen gegen den Graureiher (Ardea cinerea) an Fischgewässern. Garmische Vogelk. Berichte 12: 18–58. Google Scholar

50.

J.A. Valverde 1955. Essai sur l'Aigrette garzette (Egretta g. garzetta) en France. Alauda 23: 147–17: 254–279. Google Scholar

51.

J.A. Valverde 1956. Essai sur l'Aigrette garzette en France (Egretta garzetta). Alauda 24: 1–36. Google Scholar

52.

D.K. Vos , R.A. Ryder & W.D. Graul 1985. Response of Great Blue Herons to human disturbance in north central Colorado. Colonial Waterbirds 8: 13–22. Google Scholar

Appendices

SAMENVATTING

Koereigers Bubulcus ibis waren ooit alleen te vinden in Afrika en Zuidwest-Azië, maar in de afgelopen eeuw hebben ze in rap tempo grate delen van de wereld veroverd. Er is maar weinig bekend over hoe de vestiging in nieuwe gebieden gaat en wat het broedsucces van deze succesvolle kolonist bepaalt. In dit onderzoek wordt de kolonisatie van een gebied in Algerije beschreven, waar een kolonie zich in 1993 vestigde en vervolgens snel uitbreidde. Gedurende 1997–99 werd de kolonie intensief bestudeerd. Het broedseizoen duurde van eind maart tot eind juli, met in 1998 nog een tweede broedperiode in het najaar. Ieder jaar vestigden de eerste vogels zich in de toppen van de bomen en zo dicht mogelijk bij de stam. Latere paren zaten lager en verder weg van de stam. Reproductief succes was lager voor deze late vogels, vooral omdat veel van hun jongen bij sterke wind van de nesten vielen en dan op de grand door tal van predatoren werden opgegeten. Door de groei van de kolonie werden steeds meer vogels gedwongen op siechte plekken te broeden met een laag reproductiesucces, wat waarschijnlijk de reden was waarom in 1999 een nieuwe kolonie ontstond op twee kilometer afstand. (CB)

Abdelkrim Si Bachir, Christophe Barbraud, Salaheddine Doumandji, and Heinz Hafner "Nest Site Selection and Breeding Success in an Expanding Species, the Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis," Ardea 96(1), 99-107, (1 April 2008). https://doi.org/10.5253/078.096.0111
Received: 5 June 2006; Accepted: 1 October 2007; Published: 1 April 2008
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top