Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2014 Living in Environments with Contrasting Salinities: A Review of Physiological and Behavioural Responses in Waterbirds
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

During the course of their lives many vertebrates live and forage in environments characterized by different salinities and must therefore respond to changes in salt intake. This is particularly true for numerous species of migratory waterbirds, especially those that routinely commute between saltwater and freshwater wetlands throughout their annual cycle and/or within a season. These birds have evolved a suite of morphological, physiological and behavioural mechanisms to successfully maintain osmoregulatory balance. However, relatively little is known about the impacts of salinity on the distribution, physiological performance and reproductive success of waterbirds. Here I review the current knowledge of the physiological and behavioural mechanisms through which waterbirds cope with contrasting salinities and how some of the adjustments undertaken might interfere with relevant aspects of their performance. I argue that, because of their strong reliance on wetland ecosystems for foraging and breeding, waterbirds may be particularly vulnerable to climate-induced changes in salinity, especially in arid or semiarid tropical areas where increases in both temperature and salinity may affect their body condition and, ultimately, survival prospects. I conclude by offering some suggestions for future research that could take us beyond our current level of understanding of avian osmoregulation.

Introduction

It is has long been assumed that the sea constitutes a major physiological barrier to vertebrate distributions (Darwin, 1939; Darlington, 1957). One of the main reasons proposed is its high salt content (Bentley, 2002). Indeed, maintenance of constant intra- and extracellular ionic and osmotic conditions —i.e. osmoregulation— is considered a fundamental challenge for vertebrates living in saline environments, including birds (Skadhauge, 1981; Sabat, 2000; Goldstein, 2002; Gutiérrez et al., 2011a). Birds, as with other vertebrates, have blood concentrations of around 250–300 mOsm, which is essential for the proper functioning of cells (Bradley, 2009). However, when these organisms ingest water or food with a high salt concentration and lose water through both respiration and skin, the concentration of salts in their body increases. Under such circumstances, they must excrete excess salt and conserve body water to maintain their ionic and osmotic homeostasis. Despite the fact that avian kidneys have a limited concentrating ability (Goldstein and Skadhauge, 2000; Goldstein, 2002), many birds live in saline environments during at least part of their life cycles, and some —e.g. shorebirds, petrels and penguins— typically feed on marine invertebrates that are in osmotic and ionic equilibrium with seawater without regular access to freshwater. How can birds endure such osmotically challenging environments? In the struggle to maintain osmotic and ionic balance, birds living in saline environments have evolved a suite of physiological, behavioural and morphological mechanisms.

The supraorbital nasal saltglands —here-after, “saltglands”— are the most powerful extra-renal salt-secreting structures used by waterbirds to ensure survival under saline conditions (Schmidt-Nielsen, 1959; Peaker and Linzell, 1975). Saltglands are typically located above the orbit of the eye and extract salt ions from the bloodstream, producing a concentrated salt solution that is discarded through the nostrils (fig. 1). This retains osmotically-free water (i.e. ‘pure’ water) to sustain other physiological processes. Although the presence of the saltglands in marine and non-marine birds was observed by Comelin in 1667 (see Technau, 1936), and their anatomy described by Jacobson (1813) and Nitzsch (1820), it was not until the second half of the 20th century that their excretory function was discovered by Knut Schmidt-Nielsen and colleagues (1957, 1958). After salt-loading double-crested cormorants Phalacrocorax auritus, they found a highly hypertonic liquid that dripped out from the internal nares and accumulated at the tip of the beak, from which the birds shook the drops with a sudden jerk of the head. It was in this way that they first discovered that birds —and some reptilian relatives (Schmidt-Nielsen and Fange, 1958)— living in saline environments had an extrarenal mechanism to eliminate excess salt (reviewed by Schmidt-Nielsen, 1959, 1960, 1997).

Further investigations have made clear that the saltgland secretion is the result of a set of highly integrated interactions between the gut, kidneys, hindgut, saltglands, and supporting organs (reviewed by Goldstein and Skadhauge, 2000; Goldstein, 2002; Hughes, 2003; see fig. 2). Therefore, the functioning of this osmoregulatory machinery in an integrative manner is exceedingly important to tolerating and exploiting saline habitats. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that the ingestion of salts initiates large compensatory responses in the osmoregulatory physiology and behaviour of birds.

Marine birds and domesticated waterfowl have been primary targets of osmoregulation studies (Peaker and Linzell, 1975; Goldstein, 2002). Whilst marine birds are normally exposed to constant salinity levels throughout the year —osmotic specialists—, many waterbirds live and forage in environments where they experience large fluctuations in salinity and/or periodically alternate between freshwater and saline habitats —osmotic generalists— and could be subject to greater physiological stresses than those confronting marine species (Blakey et al., 2006). This could especially be the case for migratory shorebirds that shift seasonally from freshwater environments during the breeding season to marine environments during migration and the wintering period (Gutiérrez et al., 2013). Such seasonal changes inevitably lead to substantial increases in salt intake that must be counteracted by flexible osmoregulatory organs. However, we do not know to what extent these species are able to overcome the challenges posed by increases in salt intake. The aim of this review is to establish the ecophysiological significance of the adaptations and adjustments (see box 1 for terminology) that enable waterbirds to cope with environments with contrasting salinities. Various aspects of the anatomy, morphology and hormonal control of the avian osmoregulatory system are not addressed as they have been extensively reviewed elsewhere (Schmidt-Nielsen, 1960; Peaker, 1971; Phillips and Ensor, 1972; Peaker and Linzell, 1975; Holmes, 1975; Sturkie, 1976; Skadhauge, 1981; Simon, 1982; Holmes and Phillips, 1985; Butler et al., 1989; Braun, 1999; Shuttleworth and Hildebrandt, 1999; Goldstein and Skadhauge, 2000; Sabat, 2000; Hildebrandt, 2001; Goldstein, 2002; Bentley, 2002; McNab, 2002; Hughes, 2003). Although marine birds (Sphenisciformes, Procellariiformes, Pelecaniformes, Charadriiformes), long-legged wading birds (Ciconiiformes) and waterfowl (Anseriformes) are covered in this paper, I concentrate largely on migratory shorebirds (Charadriiformes: suborder Charadrii) as they have proved to be a robust model system for the study of avian osmoregulation.

Fig. 1.

Supraorbital saltglands of a shorebird. Note that the ducts (outlined by dashed lines) pass through the beak and empty into the anterior nasal cavity so that the secretion flows out through the nares.

[Glándulas de la sal supraorbitales de un limícola. Nótese que los conductos (indicados por líneas discontinuas) recorren el interior del pico y desembocan en la cavidad nasal anterior, de tal manera que la secreción sale a través de las narinas.]

f01_233.jpg

Fig. 2.

Pathways of water and ion influx and efflux, and principal osmoregulatory organs in waterbirds (adapted from Goldstein, 2002 and Hughes, 2003).

[Rutas de entrada y salida de agua e iones, y los órganos de osmorregulación principales en aves acuáticas (adaptado de Goldstein, 2002 y Hughes, 2003)]

f02_233.jpg

Box 1. Terminology:

Adaptation, acclimatization, acclimation, and phenotypic flexibility

The terms adaptation and acclimatization are often used interchangeably in ecological and physiological studies, but —in evolutionary terms— they have different connotations. Adaptation usually refers to a long, slow process occurring over generations —and not in an individual organism— and is rarely reversible. For example, the presence of cephalic saltglands in secondarily marine vertebrates serves as an example of adaptation to marine environments. In contrast, acclimatization is a more rapid phenomenon, whereby a physiological or biochemical change occurs within the life of an individual animal, resulting from exposure to new conditions in the animal's environment. For example, short-term changes in the size of saltglands as a function of salt intake could be interpreted as acclimatization. Acclimation is normally used for similar processes occurring in the laboratory, in response to experimentally-imposed changes in conditions. An example of acclimation reviewed in this paper is the metabolic adjustments made by some captive waterbirds to different salinity levels. Overall, reversible changes as a result of acclimation or acclimatization in adult individuals are examples of phenotypic flexibility.

Migratory shorebirds at a glance

Migratory shorebirds offer a particularly interesting opportunity for studying physiological and behavioural adaptations/adjustments to salinity because they differ in habitat preferences, diet and saline tolerance (Staaland, 1967; Blakey et al., 2006; Gutiérrez et al., 2012a, b, 2013). Many species spend a large portion of their annual cycle in marine habitats: for instance, red-necked Phalaropus lobatus and grey phalaropes P. fulicarius spend up to 9 and 11 months of the year, respectively, on the open ocean (Piersma et al., 1996; Tracy et al., 2002), while others, such as green Tringa ochropus and wood sandpipers T. glareola spend the entire year in freshwater habitats (Piersma et al., 1996). According to their nonbreeding habitat occupancy, most shorebirds can be classified as either ‘coastal’ or ‘inland’ species (Piersma, 2003, 2007; Gutiérrez et al., 2012a, b); however, other species (e.g. dunlin Calidris alpina) fall in between these extremes, occurring in both coastal and inland habitats, and can be classified as ‘mixed’ species (Piersma, 1997; Gutiérrez et al., 2012a, b). Habitat occupancy is generally linked with migration strategy, with High Arctic breeders wintering in coastal saline wetlands, and more southerly breeding congeners wintering in inland freshwater wetlands (Piersma, 1997, 2003, 2007). Coastal shorebirds generally feed on marine invertebrates found in intertidal substrates, which are in osmotic and ionic balance with seawater and thus have a high salt content, meaning that they regularly face an osmotic challenge.

Such a challenge may be particularly severe prior to migration and at intervening sites en route, since migratory shorebirds undergo major physiological adjustments to enable rapid accumulation of fuel stores (Kvist and Lindström, 2003; Lindström, 2003). As a consequence of their extraordinary food intake rates, coastally migrating shorebirds can receive high salt loads, and thus, face important osmotic challenges that might interfere with other aspects of their performance (Gutiérrez et al., 2011a, 2013). Coping with salt may be more challenging for molluscivore shorebirds that ingest hardshelled bivalves containing a large amount of seawater (Gutiérrez et al., 2012a). In contrast, terrestrial and freshwater invertebrates —which contain about 65–75% osmoticallyfree water (Hadley, 1994)— do not pose significant osmotic problems to inland shorebirds or ‘coastal’ shorebirds while breeding inland.

In addition to salt stress, migrating shore-birds may encounter energetic constraints imposed by physically demanding flights and high thermoregulatory or food-processing costs (Piersma and Lindström, 1997; Piersma, 2002). Energetic constraints and osmoregulatory problems may therefore interact in determining several aspects of migration ecology (Gutiérrez et al., 2011a, 2013). Rapid phenotypic adjustments —e.g. changes in body composition, including size and function of osmoregulatory organs— during such periods are of critical importance to many migrating shorebirds.

An integrated osmoregulatory system

Salts ingested while feeding and drinking in saline environments can induce large responses in the principal osmoregulatory organs, including the kidneys, small intestine, hindgut, saltglands and supporting organs (Hughes, 1991; 2003; Braun, 1999). Below, I describe the integrated functioning of such organs and provide some examples of ecological adaptations and adjustments to osmotic challenges.

Water and ions first move across the gut and then into the extracellular fluids. At that point, the osmotic concentration of the extracellular fluids increases and intestinally absorbed sodium chloride must be reabsorbed by the kidneys to restore the proper osmotic concentration. Birds, as do mammals, have the capacity to produce urine that is hyperosmotic relative to plasma. However, the avian kidney can generally only concentrate urine to approximately twice the plasma concentration, while the mammalian kidney can concentrate it up to 17 times the plasma concentration (Schmidt-Nielsen, 1963). Avian kidneys contain both loopless (“reptilian”-type) and looped (“mammalian”-type) nephrons. Loopless nephrons lack loops of Henle and do not contribute directly to the formation of hyperosmotic urine, whereas looped nephrons have loops of Henle and actively transport ions maximizing urine concentration (Dantzler, 1970; Goldstein and Skadhauge, 2000). The urine exiting the kidneys passes into the cloaca, where water can be resorbed and returned to the blood, to conserve water in the body even if the kidneys are not producing concentrated urine. When the kidneys are producing concentrated urine, it remains in the cloaca until excreted. The cloaca has the potential to uptake ions and water as necessary and can also be made impermeable to allow concentrated urine to pass through. In species with high salt intakes, however, the renal pathway is not sufficient to remove excess salt. In these cases reabsorbed sodium chloride is secreted as a concentrated solution —i.e. twice the maximal urine osmolality— by the saltglands.

Salt excretion by the saltglands is among the most significant physiological mechanisms used by waterbirds to cope with saline conditions. Although the saltglands are present in at least 10 of the 27 extant orders of birds, functional salt-secreting glands are mostly restricted to orders with species inhabiting saline environments (Cooch, 1964; Goldstein and Skadhauge, 2000; Sabat, 2000). Overall, both the size and excretory capacity of these glands reflects the experience of species and individuals with salt water; that is, saltglands are larger and more efficient in species and individuals that are exposed to higher salt loads (Staaland 1967; Gutiérrez et al., 2012a). Recent comparisons among and within shorebird species support the notion that habitat salinity and the salt content of the diet largely explain variation in saltgland size (Gutiérrez et al., 2012a). Among coastal shorebirds, mollusc-eaters have larger saltglands than species eating non-shelled prey, indicating that seawater contained within the shells increases the salt load of the ingested food (Gutiérrez et al., 2012a).

Maintaining and using large, active saltglands can be energetically expensive and a trade-off with other activities has thus been suggested on several occasions (Staaland, 1967; Peaker and Linzell, 1975; Burger and Gochfeld, 1984; Nyström and Pehrsson, 1988; Gutiérrez et al., 2011a; Gutiérrez et al., 2012a, 2013). Indeed, there is growing evidence that developing and maintaining osmoregulatory machinery entails substantial energy costs in birds. This explains why birds exposed to experimentally decreased salinity reduce the size and activity of their saltglands (Peaker and Linzell, 1975). This also occurs under natural conditions: Most significantly, red knots C. canutus reduce the size of their saltglands when in mild climates, probably reflecting low energy demands —i.e. low rates of food and corresponding salt intake (Gutiérrez et al., 2012a). Likewise, individual bar-tailed godwits Limosa lapponica with smaller intestines —i.e. lower relative food intake rates— have smaller saltglands, indicating that they also reduce their saltglands when osmoregulatory demands are low (Gutiérrez et al., 2012a). Together, these studies show that shorebirds, and waterbirds in general, adjust the mass of these small but essential osmoregulatory organs to changing osmoregulatory demands.

In addition, birds with functional saltglands have larger kidneys than those without (Hughes, 1970). Among Anseriformes, kidney mass is larger in strictly marine species (Kalisinska et al., 1999), which presumably reflects the higher salt loads to which these species are exposed. In line with these observations, Bennett and Hughes (2003) found that the glomerular filtration rate is also higher among marine birds. Comparing simultaneous kidney and saltgland function in three duck species occupying habitats with different salinities, marine species (Barrow's goldeneye Bucephala islandica) had the highest rates of filtration, fractional reabsorption of water and sodium, and saltgland sodium excretion, followed by estuarine (canvasback Aythya valisineria) and then freshwater species (mallard Anas platyrhynchos). This demonstrates that variations in kidney and saltgland function are, at least in part, correlated with habitat salinity. They also suggested that the larger kidneys and glomerular filtration rates of marine birds presumably reflect an increased number of glomeruli. Other studies have found that the proportion of kidney mass composed of medullary cones is high in marine species (Goldstein and Braun, 1989; Goldstein, 1993), reflecting a high proportion of mammaliantype nephrons, which form a countercurrent multiplier system and increase their ability to form hyperosmotic urine. Likewise, in passerine birds of the genus Cinclodes, the capacity to conserve urinary water by producing concentrated urine is related to differences in renal medullary development and other kidney features (Sabat et al., 2004, 2006a, b). These observations indicate that habitat is also an important factor determining kidney structure in birds. Unlike saltglands, whose size and activity show substantial phenotypic flexibility (box 1), both the kidney mass and glomerular filtration rate of waterbirds are generally little affected by salt loading (Holmes et al., 1968; Bennett and Hughes, 2003; Hughes, 2003). Nevertheless, several studies on passerines have shown that birds of some species are capable of modifying their kidney morphology in response to salt acclimation (box 1), which increases their ability to produce more concentrated urine (Sabat et al., 2004; Peña-Villalobos et al., 2013).

Salt intake can increase the mass of intestines (Hughes et al., 2002), increase gut water and sodium uptake rates in mallards (Crocker and Holmes, 1971) and decrease the time required for fluid to move through the gut (Roberts and Hughes, 1984). The hindgut appears to be particularly important for osmoregulation when saltglands are exposed to high salt loads because the hindgut can maintain high rates of intestinal salt and water reabsorption during salt loading, routing the salt to the saltglands for excretion and thereby retrieving “free water” (Schmidt-Nielsen et al., 1963; Laverty and Skadhauge, 2008; McWhorter et al., 2009). However, in other marine species, such as glaucouswinged gulls Larus glaucescens, reflux and modification of already hyperosmotic ureteral urine seems relatively unimportant in overall osmoregulation (Goldstein, 1989).

Besides renal and extrarenal pathways that enable birds to excrete excess salt and yield sufficient free water, there may be additional mechanisms to balance respiratory, cutaneous, faecal, and saltgland water losses (figs. 1 and 2). Recently, it has been demonstrated in several temperate-zone passerines that the process of water loss through the skin is under physiological control (Ro and McWilliams, 2010), which suggests that cutaneous water loss is a fundamental component of the avian water economy. Since marine and other saline environments can be considered dry in terms of osmotically-free water (Sabat, 2000), it cannot be ruled out that waterbirds adjust the rate of water loss through the skin to help maintain water, salt and heat balance.

Behavioural and mechanical means of salt avoidance

Behavioural responses provide waterbirds with additional flexibility when responding to the potential problems presented by high salt loads. The combination of avoidance of high-salinity habitats, choice of salt-free —or low-salt— prey, and use of freshwater when possible, are all well documented behaviours employed by waterbirds to avoid salt stress (e.g. Nyström and Pehrsson, 1988; Rubega and Robinson, 1997). While some waterbirds (e.g. some rails, ducks and geese) are limited to freshwater or low-salinity wetlands for their entire lives and thus do not a priori face the problem of salt stress, many others (e.g. marine birds, many shorebirds and some gulls and ducks) rely on high-salinity environments during at least part of their life cycles. These species often resort to ‘behavioural osmoregulation’ to cope with salinities that cannot be physiologically tolerated. For example, some inhabitants of hypersaline environments (e.g. the kentish plover Charadrius alexandrinus, the killdeer Ch. vociferas and the semipalmated sandpiper C. pusilla) depend primarily on an insectivorous diet with high free water contents to compensate for their limited physiological ability to tolerate salt or reduce water turnover (Purdue and Haines, 1977; Rubega and Robinson, 1997). Other studies have shown that birds have the ability to select relatively low-salt prey minimizing their salt intake. Nyström and Pehrsson (1988) and Nyström et al. (1991) showed that common eiders Somateria mollissima —especially young birds— select small mussels in areas of high salinity, considerably reducing the amount of salt they ingest. In line with these results, Cervencl and Alvarez Fernández (2012) recently showed that salinity restricted greater scaup A. marila wintering in the western Dutch Wadden Sea mainly to brackish areas.

In hypersaline habitats, where dietary salt intake may represent an important osmotic challenge for nestlings, some parents raise their chicks with low-salt diets. For instance, flamingos feed their young semiprocessed food or food produced internally from the epithelial tissue lining the digestive tract, which contains far less salt than freshly caught food (O'Connor, 1984). Likewise, Janes (1997) found that Adélie penguins Pygoscelis adeliae feed their chicks with nutritive secretions containing significantly less salt than the krill ingested by adults. Other studies have also shown that waterbirds nesting in saline habitats feed their nestlings prey containing dilute body fluids (e.g. Mahoney and Jehl, 1975c; Johnston and Bildstein, 1990), often flying long distances inland to do so. Although nestlings of species breeding in saline habitats do not have regular access to water, some have been reported eating grass, which may provide them with free water (Ensor and Phillips, 1972).

When possible, birds respond to osmotic stress by visiting freshwater sources close to their feeding grounds. In hypersaline habitats such as the Mono Lake in California, most —if not all— waterbird species travel regularly to freshwater, where they can be seen vigorously bathing and drinking (Rubega and Robinson, 1997). Rubega and Robinson (1997) suggested that birds may avoid hypersaline wetlands even for roosting because increasing water salinity negatively affects the waterproofing of waterbird feathers, which increases thermoregulatory costs under sub-thermoneutral conditions. Even in less osmotically challenging environments, many waterbirds are attracted by the presence of freshwater for drinking and preening (e.g. Woodin, 1994; Adair, 1996; Ravenscroft and Beardall, 2003). It is well established that several species of coastal diving ducks (Aythya spp.) commute between saltwater wetlands (feeding grounds) and freshwater wetlands (resting grounds) (Woodin, 1994; Adair et al., 1996). Ravenscroft and Beardall (2003) observed a similar pattern, noting the importance of freshwater flows over estuarine mudflats for waterbirds wintering in eastern England. They showed that birds were attracted by the presence of freshwater close to intertidal feeding grounds during low tide, which they attributed to the presence of freshwater for drinking and preening.

Alongside physiological and behavioural adjustments, variations in morphological traits like bill shape and size —feeding morphology— can influence the ingestion of saltwater. Indeed, it has been suggested that some feeding mechanisms can minimize salt intake. Mahoney and Jehl (1985b), for example, suggested that the large and flat tongue of eared grebes Podiceps nigricollis may be used to compress the prey against the smooth palate, flushing saltwater off the prey. Similarly, they reported that Wilson's phalaropes P. tricolor and American avocets Recurvirostra americana ingest very little saline water while feeding, supporting the idea that these species have some capacity for primitive filter-feeding (see Mahoney and Jehl, 1985a, for anatomical details). Masero (2002) and Verkuil et al. (2003) also suggested that shorebirds feeding on high salinity prey could minimize salt ingestion by using surface tension transport (Rubega, 1997), as this includes the disposal of the transported salt water. This feeding mechanism may allow small-sized calidrids to exploit saline habitats dominated by small prey items that are unprofitable and too salty for other shorebird species (Masero, 2002; Estrella and Masero, 2007). Masero (2002) showed that red knots, in contrast to several other small migrating shorebirds, do not feed extensively on brine shrimps Artemia spp. at supratidal salinas. One possible explanation could be the avoidance of salt stress (Masero, 2002). It is possible that, although red knots have relatively large saltglands (Staaland, 1967; Piersma and van Gils, 2011; Gutiérrez et al., 2012a), their thick bills do not enable them to ingest Artemia without also consuming hypersaline water.

While behavioural and anatomical mechanisms leading to a decrease in salt intake are not as well studied as physiological mechanisms themselves, they may also be crucial to maintaining the osmotic balance in many waterbird species.

Energetic costs of osmoregulation

Unlike the study of osmoregulation in fish and other aquatic animals, where energetics plays a central role (for reviews see Tseng and Hwang, 2008; Evans, 2009), energetics has been largely neglected in the study of avian osmoregulation (but see references in table 1). Soon after the discovery of the excretory function of saltglands, some authors tried to estimate the energetic costs of salt gland function by measuring oxygen consumption of the tissue in vitro, enzyme activity and the levels of metabolic intermediates (reviewed in Peaker and Linzell, 1975). Peaker and Linzell (1975) estimated the theoretical energy requirement of saltgland secretory function at c. 7% of the metabolic rate of resting ducks maintained on freshwater. To date, however, there have been only three studies examining the influence of salinity on whole-organism metabolic rate. Nehls (1996) carried out an experiment with salt-acclimated common eiders and found a marked rise in metabolic rate following oral salt administration, estimating salt turnover at 2.0–24% of metabolizable energy intake. Although this figure is low compared to those of other costs associated with foraging and food processing (Piersma et al., 2003), it reflects the energy expended in salt turnover only and not the total energy devoted to the development, maintenance and use of osmoregulatory machinery. Dunlins experimentally acclimated to different salinities increased their mass-specific basal metabolic rate (BMR) and daily energy consumption by 17 and 20% respectively during saltwater acclimation, demonstrating that the processes of developing and maintaining an active osmoregulatory machinery are indeed energetically expensive (Gutiérrez et al., 2011a). Although the increased energetic costs under saline conditions appear to be, in part, attributable to short-term adjustments in the saltglands (see Hildebrandt, 1997, 2001), substantial energetic costs are not exclusive to birds with functional saltglands. Peña-Villalobos et al. (2013) recently assessed the osmoregulatory and metabolic costs of salt excretion in the rufous-collared sparrow Zonotrichia capensis —a bird species lacking functional saltglands— and found that saltacclimated birds increased their BMR by 30%, coupled with an increase in the masses of the kidney and heart, suggesting that the increase in energy expenditure was associated with the elimination of excess salt through the kidney as well as with an increase in the mass of metabolically active tissue.

Several inter- and/or intraspecific comparative studies of avian metabolism have demonstrated that birds in marine habitats have significantly higher basal and field metabolic rates than those in terrestrial ones (Ellis, 1984; Rahn and Whittow, 1984; Bryant and Furness, 1995; Nagy, 2005; McNab, 2009; Gutiérrez et al., 2012b). In a recent study comparing the BMR of coastal and inland migratory shorebirds, Gutiérrez et al. (2012b) suggested that the increased osmoregulatory demands of coastal saline habitats may contribute to such a metabolic dichotomy.

Although studies on the energetics of avian osmoregulation are scarce, they reveal that birds living in saline habitats pay an additional energetic cost for osmoregulation. However, a deeper understanding of how saline environments influence the individual's energy budget would help explain diet and habitat selection patterns in waterbird species and populations.

Potential trade-offs with osmoregulation

By definition, life history trade-offs result from competition among different organismal functions for limited internal resources (sensu Zera and Harshman, 2001). Thus, osmoregulation is susceptible to generating resource-based trade-offs with other energetically costly activities, such as growth, thermoregulation, immune function, and moult (see table 1). For example, the trade-off between osmoregulation and growth is evident in laboratory experiments with chicks (Ellis et al., 1963; Schmidt-Nielsen and Kim, 1964; Cooch, 1964; Harvey and Phillips, 1980; Johnston and Bildstein, 1990; Barnes and Nudds, 1991; Hannam et al., 2003; DeVink et al., 2005), but also in field studies where dietary salt differs between colonies (Ensor and Phillips, 1972; Kushlan, 1977a) or is experimentally manipulated (Dosch, 1997). Together, these studies demonstrate that birds raised under highly saline conditions often exhibit a decreased growth rate. This may help explain why many waterbirds provide their chicks with low-salt food when in saline habitats (Cantin et al., 1974; Mahoney and Jehl, 1985c; Johnston and Bildstein, 1990; Bildstein et al., 1990, 1991; Janes, 1997) or breed inland (Nyström and Pehrsson, 1988).

Table 1

Estimated energetic costs of osmoregulation and other physiological demands in waterbirds as a proportion of BMR.

[Costes energéticos de la osmorregulación y otras demandas fisiológicas en aves acuáticas expresados como proporción de la tasa metabólica basal.]

t01a_233.gif

Continued

t01b_233.gif

Physiological trade-offs with osmoregulation are not exclusive to chicks. For instance, adult white ibises Eudocimus albus breeding at coastal colonies had significantly smaller clutches than those breeding at inland colonies (Kushlan, 1977a), even though chicks grew at similar rates (Kushlan, 1977b). In another field study with scarlet ibises E. ruber, Bildstein (1990) found that most adults ceased nesting when freshwater wetlands close to the colony sites became brackish due to freshwater diversion, pointing to a trade-off between osmoregulation and breeding.

Burger and Gochfeld (1984) also suggested that osmoregulation might compete energetically with moult, pre-migratory ‘fattening’ or migration. One would expect such trade-offs to be more pronounced for migratory waterbirds that return to coastal wintering and staging areas from their freshwater breeding grounds and switch from inland to marine foods. This dietary shift inevitably leads to substantial increases in salt load that should be counteracted by the saltglands —and supporting organs—, which may have lost functionality after a long period of inactivity. Despite the fact that many species increase the size of saltglands and volume of secretion within a few days of exposure to salt water (Peaker and Linzell, 1975), salt stress may limit food consumption immediately after arrival in saline environments (Burger and Gochfeld, 1984). However, Burger and Gochfeld (1984) showed that both captive and wild Franklin's gulls L. pipixcan exhibited an additional endogenous capacity for saltgland flexibility, independent of the environmental salinity. They proposed that this seasonal —circannual— programme of change in saltgland size and activity would have a high selective value in protecting individuals from undue physiological stress when they first arrive at their marine non-breeding sites. In line with these results, Mahoney and Jehl (1985a) noted that the saltglands of Wilson's phalaropes that had just arrived at the hypersaline Mono Lake in mid-June, presumably after a direct flight from their freshwater breeding grounds, were of similar size to those of birds that had resided at a hypersaline lake for several weeks. These findings provide further evidence that some species exhibit an adaptive syndrome involving a circannual program of change in the mass and composition of digestive machinery (e.g. Piersma et al., 1995, 1996; Piersma and Gill, 1998). However, the extent of such endogenous rhythmicity in the size and activity of saltglands —and other osmoregulatory organs—, as well as its underlying mechanism, remains unknown.

As seen in table 1, immune responses are energetically expensive. In this context, Gutiérrez et al. (2013) hypothesized that there is a trade-off between osmoregulation and immune response. Using dunlin experimentally acclimated to fresh- and saltwater conditions, they found that seawater salinity exerted immunosuppressive effects in individuals challenged with phytohaemagglutinin (PHA; a mitogen commonly used to assess the birds' pro-inflammatory potential). A reduced immune response under saline conditions may be associated with the function of essential osmoregulatory hormones, some of which have anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects (Gutiérrez et al., 2013). Indeed, essential hormones in extrarenal excretion such as prolactin, melatonin, or corticosterone may be involved in the secretory activity of saltglands (reviewed in Phillips and Ensor, 1972). For example, prolactin and corticosterone have been shown to restore saltgland secretion in adenohy-pophysectomized ducks (Phillips and Ensor, 1972; Butler et al., 1989), which could facilitate their adjustment to saline environments (Ensor and Phillips, 1970). On the other hand, melatonin has been shown to inhibit saltgland secretion rate and its sodium concentration in mallards (Ching et al., 1999; but see Hughes et al., 2007). This suggests that melatonin's osmoregulatory function may conflict with its immune function, as there is some evidence that increased exposure to melatonin during long winter nights enhances immune function (Hasselquist, 2007). If true, birds wintering in coastal saline environments may be subjected to a hormonally induced tradeoff between osmoregulation and immune function —at least in ecosystems where winter is the most demanding time of the year (see Buehler et al., 2009). Similarly, it is also possible that exposure to saline conditions could result in an increase in the circulating levels of corticosterone (Phillips and Ensor, 1972; Harvey and Phillips, 1980), which, in turn, may generate trade-offs with immune response (Martin et al., 2005).

Although both osmoregulation and moult carry significant energetic costs (table 1), no study has dealt with the possible trade-off between these two processes. Birds in high saline conditions should likely reduce the amount of energy available for moult (Burger and Gochfeld, 1984). Such a potential trade-off could be relevant in saline staging and/or wintering areas where birds normally begin or resume interrupted moult. For example, this could pose a substantial physiological challenge for Wilson’s and red-necked phalaropes congregating at hypersaline lakes in western North America which must moult and refuel before migrating to wintering grounds in South America. In 3–6 weeks, these species undergo a rapid replacement of nearly all their body plumage, several primaries, and rectrices (Jehl, 1987, 1988). They must simultaneously become hyperphagic by feeding on brine shrimp Artemia sp. and brine flies Ephydra hians, which may lead them to ingest large salt loads (Mahoney and Jehl, 1985b). They appear to overcome this problem by frequently flying to nearby freshwater creeks to dilute their salt intake and, perhaps, they are also able to derive appreciable water from their food (Mahoney and Jehl, 1985b). In contrast, Jehl (2005) noted that many gadwall Anas strepera —which are less salt-tolerant— failed to complete wing moult after breeding at the hypersaline Mono Lake even though food remains abundant in the lake well into the autumn.

Salinity and parasites

Salinity, along with temperature and moisture, is considered a key abiotic factor in shaping parasite and pathogen distribution, thereby influencing the risk of infection and disease. In birds, there is substantial evidence that species restricted to coastal marine and saline habitats have a lower prevalence of infection by blood parasites than those relying on inland freshwater habitats (e.g. Piersma, 1997; Figuerola, 1999; Jovani, et al., 2001; Mendes et al., 2005; Yohannes et al., 2009; Quillfeldt et al., 2011). Accordingly, shorebirds restricted to coastal saline habitats during the nonbreeding season may be exposed to fewer parasites and thus invest less in immune defence mechanisms than those using freshwater habitats (Piersma, 1997). The relative low parasite prevalence and diversity of blood parasites in saline habitats could be explained by the reduced abundance of invertebrate vectors, but also by other factors such as the immunocompetence of the host and the absence of alternative hosts that could serve as a reservoir for the parasite (Yohannes et al., 2009). However, coastal saline habitats are not parasite-free. For instance, trematodes —and other helminths— are extremely common parasites of invertebrates and vertebrates living on mudflats and rocky shores (see Mouritsen and Poulin, 2002 and references therein). The life cycle of these parasites typically involves a gastropod or a bivalve as first intermediate host, and is completed when the second intermediate host is eaten by a suitable definitive host, frequently a shorebird. Although the effects of salinity on the replication and transmission of these parasites are still poorly understood, there is evidence that cercarial emergence —and thus its success— generally increases with increasing salinity within a range of values normally occurring in coastal habitats (Mouritsen, 2002). Recently, Lei and Poulin (2011) showed that the replication and transmission of the trematode Philophthalmus sp., a common parasite of waterbirds, was negatively influenced by salinities below that of normal seawater, suggesting that low salinity would reduce transmission success to waterbirds. Thus the effects of salinity on parasite abundance and distribution will depend on the type of parasite and its life cycle stage. Moreover, although blood parasite vectors are scarce —or absent— in some coastal saline environments, birds may prey on intertidal invertebrates infected by various macroparasites —trematodes, nematodes, polychaetes, cestodes, turbellarians, copepods — that could have dramatic impact on their individual fitness and larger-scale population dynamics (Mouritsen and Poulin, 2002). A deeper understanding of how salinity affects the prevalence and intensity of parasitic infection in waterbirds is much needed. Understanding such a link will enhance our ability to predict how birds will respond to changes in salinity —and other factors— predicted by some climate-change scenarios.

Climate-related salinity changes and their potential impacts

Until now, most climate-related waterbird research has focused on potential shifts in phenology, distribution and abundance driven by changes in temperature, rainfall and sea level (e.g. Austin and Rehfisch, 2003; Rehfisch and Crick, 2003; Rehfisch et al., 2004; Maclean et al., 2007; Cox, 2010; Senner, 2012; Iwamura et al., 2013). However, as of yet, there is only a very limited literature dealing with the potential effects of climate-induced salinity changes on the distribution and performance of waterbirds occurring in either coastal or inland wetlands. While such shifts are expected to occur in concert with rising global temperatures, both the direction and magnitude of change vary regionally and may thus affect different waterbird populations differently.

Coastal wetlands are particularly at risk from the predicted effects of global climate change (IPCC, 2014). Global mean sea level is projected to rise above 1 m by 2100 (IPCC, 2014), thereby salinizing brackish and freshwater coastal wetlands. Overall, models predict a systematic ‘freshening’ at both poleward ends and increasing salinitities at low latitudes, although most studies suggest that future changes will be regionally variable (e.g. Najjar et al., 2000; Gibson and Najjar, 2000).

Climate change has been particularly evident in West Africa in the past 30 years. Droughts have led to a significant decrease in freshwater flow, leading to an increased salinity in the region (Cox, 2010). These increases could affect the water-salt balance of millions of coastal waterbirds that spend the non-breeding season in the region. In the Banc d'Arguin, Mauritania, more than two million wintering shorebirds cope with relatively high salinities and temperatures without regular access to freshwater (Wolff and Smit, 1990). Such conditions may be expected to cause both heat stress (Klaassen, 1990) and salt stress (Klaassen and Ens, 1990). Indeed, heat and salt stress can potentially limit food consumption in shorebirds, especially in individuals preparing to migrate. Klaassen and Ens (1990) showed that both red knots and sanderlings C. alba reduced their food intake when they were switched from fresh- to seawater under experimental conditions. Moreover, Klaassen et al. (1990) showed that, in captive shorebirds fed with artificial food, digestibility decreased by 2.1% for each degree rise in the air temperature. Assuming this phenomenon also applies to natural food, birds should eat more to compensate for decreased prey digestibility at high temperatures (Zwarts et al., 1990) and increased energetic costs at high salinities (Gutiérrez et al., 2011a).

Similar problems could be found along the northern coast of Australia, where projections for future climatic changes indicate substantial increases in mean temperatures (Hughes, 2003), which in turn will affect salinity regimes. Battley et al. (2003) found evidence for heat-load problems in great knots C. tenuirostris during fuelling at Roebuck Bay, northwest Australia. Although birds might alleviate heat stress through heatreduction behaviours such as ptiloerection, panting, guiar fluttering, belly soaking or maintaining contact between their feet and relatively cooler seawater (e.g. Klaassen, 1990; Battley et al., 2003; Amat and Masero, 2007), the high temperature and solar radiation levels of tropical coasts elevate water loss through evaporation, via respiration or through the skin (see Ro and McWilliams, 2010). To compensate for this water loss, birds would need very well-developed osmoregulatory organs that allow them to excrete highly concentrated solutions and obtain salt-free water from prey.

In the near future, changes in seawater salinity are also predicted for European marine ecosystems, although these will be regionally variable and dependent on circulation patterns (Philippart et al., 2011). For example, the salinity of the Baltic Sea is expected to decrease as a result of increasing precipitation during winter (Philippart et al., 2011). In contrast, modelling studies predict an increase in salinity in the North Atlantic, generated by higher evaporation rates in the tropics (Bethke et al., 2006). Such changes are thought to have a major influence on the distribution of waterbird species, as salinity is a major factor affecting the abundance and distribution of food resources for waterbirds and, therefore, waterbird distributions them-selves (Ysebaert et al., 2000, 2003).

Climate change is not the only component of anthropogenic global change producing changes in salinity. Increasing irrigation, damming, and water diversion either for agricultural or urban uses could result in increased salinization at many of the world's most important waterbird sites. The problem of water salinization in inland wetlands has been addressed by Rubega and Robinson (1997). Focusing on arid lands of western North America, they assessed the direct and indirect effects of salinization, as well as possible management techniques for reducing or eliminating its impacts on shorebird populations. Aside from the direct effects of increased salinity alluded to in previous sections, they also discussed that salinization could also result in severe reductions in biodiversity and abundance of food resources, which may be catastrophic for certain shorebirds (e.g. Rubega and Inouye, 1994). Understanding such a relationship is thus essential for predicting future global change scenarios.

Conclusions and future directions

Research on avian osmoregulation makes clear that environmental salinity induces a number of adaptations and adjustments, which critically influence, or even delimit, the distribution of bird species. Phenotypic flexibility in the osmoregulatory system of migratory waterbirds appears to be critically important in allowing birds to successfully overcome osmotic challenges faced during the course of their annual cycles. There is growing evidence that living in saline environments entails significant energetic costs and this could play a significant role in an individual's energy budget, affecting patterns of habitat, diet selection or immunocompetence. Management of freshwater outflows into coastal and inland wetlands is therefore critical for the conservation of many waterbird species (Bildstein, 1990; Woodin, 1994; Rubega and Robinson, 1997; Ravenscroft and Beardall, 2003).

As pointed out by Hughes (2003), a comparison of species that seasonally move between freshwater and seawater offers the opportunity to examine adjustments in osmoregulatory features and a comparison of inland and coastal populations of the same species offers a unique opportunity to examine the ecological and genetic basis of osmotic tolerance. Accordingly, more detailed information on the osmoregulatory physiology in different species and populations of waterbirds is needed for empirical tests of hypotheses about the likely consequences of global change and the proper design of conservation strategies.

Despite the considerable effort to examine the effects of salinity per se on various life-history traits by experimentally acclimating birds to different salinity levels, we need to design experiments capable of determining the effects of salinity when birds are simultaneously faced with other physiological challenges (e.g. thermoregulation, moult or migratory fuelling). This approach will be useful in identifying potential trade-offs with osmoregulation and could generate more biologically meaningful estimates of environmental tolerance. As has been noted, salinity interacts with other abiotic and biotic factors in complex ways that can critically affect waterbirds and the prey upon which they depend. For example, several authors have shown that osmoregulation and thermoregulation are physiological processes that are intimately linked (e.g. Skadhauge, 1981; Verboven and Piersma, 1995; Gutiérrez et al., 2012a). As a result, climatic-induced increases in both temperature and salinity may have significant impacts on the performance of waterbirds. Such interactive effects of salinity and temperature can be relatively easily quantified by performing laboratory-controlled experiments in which both variables are manipulated but the remainder are held constant. Our understanding of avian ecophysiological responses —and their limits— to saline environments would be greatly improved by combining the effects of different environmental factors.

Unravelling how salinity influences the links within- and between-host disease processes remains another important challenge, especially in the face of global climate change. Changes in salinity have the potential to affect parasite development and survival rates, disease transmission and host susceptibility (e.g. Mouritsen, 2002; Lei and Poulin, 2011). Moreover, salinity itself can have immunosuppressive effects (Gutiérrez et al., 2013), which may have significant consequences for waterbirds that periodically alternate between fresh- and saltwater habitats. Hence, further work is necessary to investigate the effect of salinity on the different components of the immune system —innate, humoral, and cell-mediated.

While several experimental studies have investigated the short-term effects of salinity on different osmoregulatory traits, the possibility that other environmental factors or exogenous stimuli could influence the osmoregulatory ability in birds have not been formally addressed. Burger and Gochfeld (1984) suggested that endogenous control of saltglands would be advantageous for birds seasonally moving between saline and freshwater habitats. Indeed, the ability to adjust the size and activity of saltglands in absence of salt loading might mitigate both short-term physiological costs when arriving in saline environments and potentially deleterious carry-over effects from one season to the next. The underlying mechanisms behind this endogenous control, however, remain unknown. As previously pointed by Burger and Gochfeld (1984) and Gutiérrez et al. (2013), the relationships between the size and activity of osmoregulatory organs, endocrine factors, and other aspects of migration physiology should be another important avenue for future work.

An integration of knowledge on physiological and behavioural responses to salinity and the relative tolerance of species is critical for understanding community level impacts of salinity changes, whether natural or anthropogenically induced.

Acknowledgements.—

Foremost I would like to acknowledge the major role played by José A. Masero, Juan M. Sánchez-Guzmán and Theunis Piersma in developing this project. I thank Jordi Figuerola and Juan A. Amat for encouraging me to write this article and commenting most helpfully upon it. JAM, TP, Nathan R. Senner, Pablo Sabat and two anonymous reviewers gave helpful comments on the manuscript. NRS and Ernest Garcia kindly improved the English. Manuel Parejo provided the schematic drawing represented in figure 1. Much of the thinking behind this paper was carried out for a doctoral thesis funded by the Government of Extremadura (PRE07034) and by the Project CGL2011-27485 (Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation).

Bibliography

1.

J. M. Abad-Gómez , J. S. Gutiérrez A. Villegas , J. M. Sánchez-Guzmán , J. G. Navedo and J. A. Masero 2013. Time course and metabolic costs of a humoral immune response in the little ringed plover Charadrius dubius. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology , 86: 354–60. Google Scholar

2.

S. E. Adair , J. L. Moore and W. H. Kiel Jr . 1996. Wintering diving duck use of coastal ponds: an analysis of alternative hypotheses. Journal of Wildlife Management , 60: 83–93. Google Scholar

3.

J. A. Amat and J. A. Masero 2007. The functions of belly-soaking in Kentish plovers Charadrius alexandrinus. Ibis , 149: 91–97. Google Scholar

4.

G. E. Austin and M. M. Rehfisch 2003. The likely impact of sea level rise on waders (Charadrii) wintering on estuaries. Journal for Nature Conservation , 11: 43–58. Google Scholar

5.

P. F. Battley , D. I. Rogers , T. Piersma and A. Koolhaas 2003. Behavioural evidence for heat-load problems in great knots in tropical Australia fuelling for long-distance flight. Emu , 103: 97–103. Google Scholar

6.

G. G. Barnes and T. D. Nudds 1991. Salt tolerance in American black ducks, mallards, and their F-l hybrids. Auk , 108: 89–98. Google Scholar

7.

D. C. Bennett and Hughes , M. R . 2003. Comparison of renal and salt gland function in three species of wild ducks. Journal of Experimental Biology , 206: 3273–3284. Google Scholar

8.

I. Bethke , T. Furevik and H. Drange 2006. Towards a more saline North Atlantic and a fresher Arctic under global warming. Geophysical Research Letters , 33: L21712. Google Scholar

9.

P. J. Bentley 2002. Endocrines and Osmoregulation: A Comparative Account in Vertebrates , 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag. Berlin. Google Scholar

10.

K. L. Bildstein 1990. Status, conservation and management of the scarlet ibis (Eudocimus ruber) in the Caroni Swamp, Trinidad, West Indies. Biological Conservation , 54: 61–78. Google Scholar

11.

R. Blakey , Y. Zharikov and G. A. Skilleter 2006. Lack of an osmotic constraint on intake rate of the eastern curlew (Numenius madagascariensis). Journal of Avian Biology , 37: 299– 305. Google Scholar

12.

T. J. Bradley 2009. Animal Osmoregulation. Oxford University Press Inc., New York. Google Scholar

13.

E. J. Braun 1999. Integration of organ system in avian osmoregulation. Journal of Experimental Zoology , 238: 702–707. Google Scholar

14.

L. W. Bruinzeel and T. Piersma , 1998. Cost reduction in the cold: heat generated by terrestrial locomotion partly substitutes for thermoregulation costs in knot Calidris canutus. Ibis , 140: 323–328. Google Scholar

15.

D. M. Bryant and R. W. Furness 1995. Basal metabolic rates of North-Atlantic seabirds. Ibis , 137: 219–226. Google Scholar

16.

J. Burger and M. Gochfeld 1984. Seasonal variation in size and function of the nasal salt gland of the Franklin's gull (Larus pipixcan). Comparative and Biochemical Physiology , 77: 103–110. Google Scholar

17.

D. M. Buehler , A. Koolhaas , T. J. Van't Hof , I. Schwabl , A. Dekinga , T. Piersma and B. I. Tieleman 2009. No evidence for melatonin-linked immunoenhancement over the annual cycle of an avian species. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 195: 445–451. Google Scholar

18.

D. G. Butler , H. Siwanowicz and D. Puskas 1989. A re-evaluation of experimental evidence for the hormonal control of avian nasal salt glands. In, M. R. Hughes and A. Chadwick (Eds.): Progress in Avian Osmoregulation , pp. 127–141. Leeds Philosophical and Literary Society. Google Scholar

19.

M. Cantin , J. Bédard and H. Milne 1974. The food and feeding of common eiders in the St. Lawrence estuary in summer. Canadian Journal of Zoology , 52: 319–334. Google Scholar

20.

A. Cervencl and A. Álvarez Fernández 2012. Winter distribution of greater scaup Aythya marila in relation to available food resources. Journal of Sea Research , 73: 41–48. Google Scholar

21.

A. C. T. Ching , M. R. Hughes , A. M. S. Poon and S. F. Pang 1999. Melatonin receptors and melatonin inhibition of duck salt gland secretion. General Comparative Endocrinology , 116: 229–240. Google Scholar

22.

F.G. Cooch 1964. A preliminary study of the survival value of a functional salt gland in prairie Anatidae. Auk , 81: 380–93. Google Scholar

23.

G. W. Cox 2010. Bird Migration and Global Change. Island Press. Washington D.C. Google Scholar

24.

A. D. Crocker and W. N. Holmes 1971. Intestinal absorption in ducklings (Anas platyrhynchos) maintained on fresh water and hypertonic saline. Comparative and Biochemical Physiology A , 40: 203–211. Google Scholar

25.

W. H. Dantzler 1970. Kidney function in desert vertebrates. In, G. K. Benson and J. G. Phillips (Eds.): Hormones and the Environment , pp. 157–189. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Google Scholar

26.

P. J. Darlington 1957. Zoogeography: The Geographical Distribution of Animals. John Wiley and Sons. New York. Google Scholar

27.

J.-M. A. DeVink , H. G. Gilchrist and A. W. Diamond 2005. Effects of water salinity on growth and survival of common eider (Somateria mollissima) ducklings. Auk , 122: 523–529. Google Scholar

28.

J. J. Dosch 1997. Salt tolerance of nestling laughing gulls: An experimental field investigation. Colonial Waterbirds , 20: 449–457. Google Scholar

29.

H. I. Ellis 1984. Energetics of free-ranging seabirds. In, G. C. Whittow and H. Rahn (Eds.): Seabird Energetics , pp. 203–234. Plenum Press. New York. Google Scholar

30.

R. A. Ellis , C. C. Goertemiller , R. A. Delellis and Y. H. Kablotsky 1963. The effect of a saltwater regimen on the salt glands of domestic ducklings. Developmental Biology , 8: 286–308. Google Scholar

31.

D. M. Ensor and J. G. Phillips 1970. The effect of salt loading on the pituitary prolactin levels of the domestic duck (Anas platyrhynchos) and juvenile herring or lesser black-backed gulls (Larus argentatus or Larus fuscus). Journal of Endocrinology , 48: 167–172. Google Scholar

32.

D. M. Ensor and J. G. Phillips 1972. The effect of age and environment on extrarenal excretion in juvenile gulls (Larus argentatus and L. fuscus). Journal of Zoology , 168: 119–126. Google Scholar

33.

S. M. Estrella , J. A. Masero and A. Pérez-Hurtado 2007. Small prey profitability: field analysis of shorebirds' use of surface tension of water to transport prey. Auk , 124: 1244–1253. Google Scholar

34.

D. H. Evans 2009. Osmotic and Ionic Regulation: Cells and Animals. CRC Press. Boca Raton. Google Scholar

35.

J. Figuerola 1999. Effects of salinity on rates of infestation of waterbirds by haematozoa. Ecography , 22: 681–685. Google Scholar

36.

J. R. Gibson and R. G. Najjar 2000. The response of Chesapeake Bay salinity to climate-induced changes in streamflow. Limnology and Oceanography , 45: 1764–1772. Google Scholar

37.

D. L. Goldstein 1993. Renal response to saline infusion in chicks of Leach's storm petrels (Oceanodroma leucorhoa). Journal of Comparative Physiology B 163: 167–173. Google Scholar

38.

D. L. Goldstein 1999. Patterns of variation in avian osmoregulatory physiology and their application to questions in ecology. In, N. J. Adams and R. H. Slotow (Eds.): Proceedings of the 22th International Ornithological Congress , pp. 1417–1426. BirdLife South Africa. Johannesburg. Google Scholar

39.

D. L. Goldstein 2002. Water and salt balance in seabirds. In, E. A. Schreiber and J. Burger (Eds.): Biology of Marine Birds , pp. 467–483. CRC Press. New York. Google Scholar

40.

D. L. Goldstein 1989. Transport of water and electrolytes by the lower intestine and its contribution to avian osmoregulation. In, M. R. Hughes and A. Chadwick (Eds.): Avian Osmoregulation , pp. 271–294. Leeds Philosophical and Literary Society. Leeds. Google Scholar

41.

D. L. Goldstein and E. J. Braun 1989. Structure and concentrating ability in the avian kidney. American Journal of Physiology , 256: R501–R509. Google Scholar

42.

D. L. Goldstein and E. Skadhauge 2000. Renal and extrarenal regulation of body fluid composition. In, G. C. Whittow (Ed.): Sturkey's Avian Physiology , pp. 265–297, Academic Press. New York. Google Scholar

43.

J. A. Green , P. J. Butler , A. J. Woakes and I. L. Boyd 2004. Energetics of the moult fast in macaroni penguins Eudyptes chrysolophus. Journal of Avian Biology , 35: 153–161. Google Scholar

44.

M. Guillemette , D. Pelletier , J. M. Grandbois and P. J. Butler 2007. Flightlessness and the energetic cost of wing moult in a large sea duck. Ecology , 88: 2936–2945. Google Scholar

45.

Q. Guozhen and X. Hongfa 1986. Molt and resting metabolic rate in the common teal Anas crecca and the shoveller Anas clypeata. Acta Zoologica Sinica , 32: 73–84. Google Scholar

46.

J. S. Gutiérrez , J. A. Masero , J. M. Abad-Gómez , A. Villegas and J. M. Sánchez-Guzmán 2011a. Understanding the energetic costs of living in saline environments: effects of salinity on basal metabolic rate, body mass and daily energy consumption of a long-distance migratory shorebird. Journal of Experimental Biology , 214: 829–835. Google Scholar

47.

J. S. Gutiérrez , J. A. Masero , J. M. Abad-Gómez , A. Villegas and J. M. Sánchez-Guzmán 2011b. Metabolic consequences of overlapping food restriction and cell-mediated immune response in a long-distance migratory shorebird, the little ringed plover Charadrius dubius. Journal of Avian Biology , 42: 259–265. Google Scholar

48.

J. S. Gutiérrez , M. W. Dietz , J. A. Masero , R. E. Gill Jr ., A. Dekinga , P. F. Battley , J. M. Sánchez-Guzmán and T. Piersma 2012a. Functional ecology of saltglands in shorebirds: flexible responses to variable environmental conditions. Functional Ecology , 26: 236–244. Google Scholar

49.

J. S. Gutiérrez , J. M. Abad-Gómez , J. M. Sánchez-Guzmán , J. G. Navedo and J. A. Masero 2012b. Avian BMR in marine and non-marine habitats: a test using shorebirds. PLoS ONE , 7(7): e42206. Google Scholar

50.

J. S. Gutiérrez , J. M. Abad-Gómez , A. Villegas , J. M. Sánchez-Guzmán . and J. A. Masero 2013. Effects of salinity on the immune response of an ‘osmotic generalist’ bird. Oecologia , 171: 61–69. Google Scholar

51.

N. F. Hadley 1994. Water Relations of Terrestrial Arthropods. Academic Press. London. Google Scholar

52.

M. K. Hannam , L. W. Oring and M. P. Herzog 2003. Impacts of salinity on growth and behavior of American Avocet chicks. Waterbirds , 26: 119–125. Google Scholar

53.

S. Harvey and J. G. Phillips 1980. Growth, growth hormone and corticosterone secretion in freshwater and saline-adapted ducklings (Anas platyrhynchos). General Comparative Endocrinology , 42: 334–344. Google Scholar

54.

D. Hasselquist 2007. Comparative immunoecology in birds: hypotheses and tests. Journal of Ornithology , 148: S571–S582. Google Scholar

55.

J. P. Hildebrandt 1997. Changes in Na+/K+-AT-Pase expression during adaptive cell differentiation in avian nasal salt gland. Journal of Experimental Biology , 200: 1895–1904. Google Scholar

56.

J. P. Hildebrandt 2001. Coping with excess salt: adaptive functions of extrarenal osmoregulatory organs in vertebrates. Zoology , 104: 209– 220. Google Scholar

57.

W. N. Holmes 1975. Hormones and osmoregulation in marine birds. General and Comparative Endocrinology , 25: 249–258. Google Scholar

58.

W. N. Holmes and J. G. Phillps 1985. The avian salt gland. Biological Reviews , 60: 213–256. Google Scholar

59.

W. N. Holmes , G. L. Fletcher and D. J. Stewart 1968. The patterns of renal electrolyte excretion in the duck (Anas platyrhynchos) maintained on freshwater and on hypertonic saline. Journal of Experimental Biology , 45: 487–508. Google Scholar

60.

L. Hughes 2003. Climate change and Australia: trends, projections and impacts. Austral Ecology , 28: 423–443. Google Scholar

61.

M. R. Hughes 1991. Integrative aspects of osmoregulation in birds. Acta Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici , 20: 2138–2146. Google Scholar

62.

M. R. Hughes 2003. Regulation of salt gland, gut and kidney interactions. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A, 136: 507–524. Google Scholar

63.

M R. Hughes , D. C. Bennett and T. M. Sullivan 2002. Effect of saline drinking water on the size and water content of the gut and other organs of male and female mallards. Canadian Journal of Zoology , 80: 70–76. Google Scholar

64.

IPCC. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available at:  http:/www.ipcc.ch Accessed on 26 July 2014. Google Scholar

65.

T. Iwamura , H. P. Possingham , I. Chadès , C. Minton , N. J. Murray , D. I. Rogers , E. A. Treml and R. A. Fuller 2013. Migratory connectivity magnifies the consequences of habitat loss from sea-level rise for shorebird populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B , 280: 20130325. Google Scholar

66.

L. L. Jacobson 1813. Sur une glande conglomérée appartenant à la cavité nasale. Bulletin de la Société Philomatique de Paris , 3: 267. Google Scholar

67.

D. N. Janes 1997. Osmoregulation by Adelie penguin chicks on the Antarctic Peninsula. Auk , 114: 488–495. Google Scholar

68.

J. W. Johnston and K. L. Bildstein 1990. Dietary salt as a physiological constraint in white ibis breeding in an estuary. Physiological Zoology , 63: 190–207. Google Scholar

69.

R. Jovani , J. L. Tella , M. G. Forero , M. Bertellotti , G. Blanco , O. Ceballos and J. A. Donázar 2001. Apparent absence of blood parasites in the Patagonian seabird community: is it related to the marine environment? Waterbirds, 24: 430–433. Google Scholar

70.

E. Kalisinska , A. Dañczak M. Pierko and D. Wysocki 1999. Relationships between kidney mass and body size in some Anseriformes. Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia , 28: 55–59. Google Scholar

71.

M. Klaassen and B. J. Ens 1990. Is salt stress a problem for waders wintering on the Banc d'Arguin, Mauritania? Ardea , 78: 67–74. Google Scholar

72.

M. Klaasen , M. Kersten and B. J. Ens 1990. Energetic requirements for maintenance and premigratory body mass gain of waders wintering in Africa. Ardea , 78: 209–220. Google Scholar

73.

J. A. Kushlan 1977a. Population energetics of the American white ibis. Auk , 94: 114–122. Google Scholar

74.

J. A. Kushlan 1977b. Growth energetics of the white ibis. Condor , 79: 31–36. Google Scholar

75.

A. Kvist and Å. Lindström 2003. Gluttony in migratory waders — unprecedented energy assimilation rates in vertebrates. Oikos , 103: 397–402. Google Scholar

76.

G. Laverty and E. Skadhauge 2008. Adaptive strategies for post-renal handling of urine in birds. Comparative and Biochemical Physiology , 149A: 246–254. Google Scholar

77.

F. Lei and R. Poulin 2011. Effects of salinity on multiplication and transmission of an intertidal trematode parasite. Marine Biology , 158: 995– 1003. Google Scholar

78.

Å. Lindström 2003. Fuel deposition rates in migrating birds: causes, constraints and consequences. In, P. Berthold , E. Gwinner and E. Sonnenschein (eds.): Avian Migration , pp. 307–320. Springer. Berlin. Google Scholar

79.

I. M. D. Maclean , M. M. Rehfisch , A. Delany and R. A. Robinson 2007. The Effects of Climate Change on Migratory Waterbirds within the African-Eurasian Flyway. British Trust for Ornithology. Google Scholar

80.

S. Mahoney and J. R. Jehl Jr . 1985a. Adaptations of migratory shorebirds to highly saline and alkaline lakes: Wilson's phalarope and American avocet. Condor , 87: 520–527. Google Scholar

81.

S. Mahoney and J. R. Jehl Jr . 1985b. Avoidance of salt loading by a diving bird at a hypersaline and alkaline lake: Eared grebe. Condor , 87: 389– 397. Google Scholar

82.

S. Mahoney and J. R. Jehl Jr . 1985c. Physiological ecology and salt loading of California gulls at an alkaline, hypersaline lake. Physiological Zoology , 58: 553–563. Google Scholar

83.

L. B. Martin , J. Gilliam , P. Han K.A. Lee and M. Wikelski 2005. Corticosterone suppresses immune function in temperate but not tropical house sparrows, Passer domesticus. General and Comparative Endocrinology , 140: 126–135. Google Scholar

84.

J. A. Masero 2002. Why don't red knots Calidris canutus feed extensively on the crustacean Artemia? Bird Study , 49: 304–306. Google Scholar

85.

B. K. McNab 2002. The Physiological Ecology of Vertebrates. A View from Energetics. Cornell University Press. Ithaca. Google Scholar

86.

B. K. McNab 2009. Ecological factors affect the level and scaling of avian BMR. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A, 152: 22–45. Google Scholar

87.

T. J. McWhorter , E. Caviedes-Vidal and W. H. Karasov 2009. The integration of digestion and osmoregulation in the avian gut. Biological Reviews , 84: 533–565. Google Scholar

88.

L. Mendes , T. Piersma , M. Lecoq B. Spaans and R. E. Ricklefs 2005. Disease-limited distributions? Contrasts in the prevalence of avian malaria in shorebird species using marine and freshwater habitats. Oikos , 109: 396–404. Google Scholar

89.

K.A. Nagy 2005. Field metabolic rate and body size. Journal of Experimental Biology 208: 1621–1625. Google Scholar

90.

R. G Najjar , H. A. Walker , P. J. Anderson , E. J. Barron , R. J. Bord , J. R. Gibson , V. S. Kennedy , C. G. Knight , J. P. Megonigal , R. E. O'Connor , C. D. Polsky , N. P. Psuty , B. A. Richards , L. G. Sorenson , E. M. Steele , and R. S. Swanson 2000. The potential impacts of climate change on the mid-Atlantic coastal region. Climate Research , 14: 219–233. Google Scholar

91.

G. Nelhs 1996. Low costs of salt turnover in common eiders Somateria mollissima. Ardea , 84: 23–30. Google Scholar

92.

C. L. Nitzsch 1820. Ueber die Nasendrüse der Vögel. Deutsches Archiv für die Physiologie (Meckel's Archiv) 6: 234–269. Google Scholar

93.

K. G. K. Nyström and O. Pehrsson 1988. Salinity as a constraint affecting food and habitat choice of mussel-feeding diving ducks. Ibis , 130: 94–110. Google Scholar

94.

K. G. K. Nyström , O. Pehrsson and D. Broman 1991. Food of juvenile common eiders (Somateria mollissima) in areas of high and low salinity. Auk , 108: 250–256. Google Scholar

95.

R. J. O'Connor 1984. The Growth and Development of Birds. Wiley. New York. Google Scholar

96.

M. Peaker 1971. Avian salt gland. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 262: 289–300. Google Scholar

97.

M. Peaker and J. L. Linzell 1975. Salt Glands in Birds and Reptiles. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Google Scholar

98.

I. Peña-Villalobos , F. Valdés-Ferranty and P. Sabat 2013. Osmoregulatory and metabolic costs of salt excretion in the rufous-collared sparrow Zonotrichia capensis. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A , 164: 314– 318. Google Scholar

99.

C. J. M. Philippart , R. Anadón , R. Danovaro , J. W. Dippner , K. F. Drinkwater , S. J. Hawkins , T. Oguz , G. O'Sullivan and P. C. Reid 2011. Impacts of climate change on European marine ecosystems: Observations, expectations and indicators. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology , 400: 52–69. Google Scholar

100.

J. G. Phillips and D. M. Ensor ( 1972). The significance of environmental factors in the hormone mediated changes of nasal (salt) gland activity in birds. General and Comparative Endocrinology Supplement , 3: 393–404. Google Scholar

101.

T. Piersma 1997. Do global patterns of habitat use and migration strategies co-evolve with relative investments in immunocompetence due to spatial variation in parasite pressure? Oikos , 80: 623–631. Google Scholar

102.

T. Piersma 2002. Energetic bottlenecks and other design constraints in avian annual cycles. Integrative and Comparative Biology , 42: 51–67. Google Scholar

103.

T. Piersma 2003. ‘Coastal’ versus ‘inland’ shorebird species: interlinked fundamental dichotomies between their life- and demographic histories? Wader Study Group Bulletin , 100: 5–9. Google Scholar

104.

T. Piersma and A. Lindström 1997. Rapid reversible changes in organ size as a component of adaptive behaviour. Trends in Ecology and Evolution , 12: 134–138. Google Scholar

105.

T. Piersma and R. E. Gill Jr . 1998. Guts don't fly: small digestive organs in obese bar-tailed godwits. Auk , 115: 196–203. Google Scholar

106.

T. Piersma and J. A. Van Gils 2011. The Flexible Phenotype. A Body-Centred Integration of Ecology, Physiology, and Behaviour. Oxford University Press. Oxford. Google Scholar

107.

T. Piersma , N. Cadee and S. Daan 1995. Seasonality in basal metabolic rate and conductance in a long-distance migrant shorebird, the knot. Journal of Comparative Physiology , 165: 37–45. Google Scholar

108.

T. Piersma , J. Van Gils and P. Wiersma 1996. Family Scolopacidae (sandpipers, snipes and phalaropes). In, J. del Hoyo , A. Elliott and J- Sargatal (Eds.): Handbook of the Birds of the World , Vol. 3, pp. 444–533. Lynx Edicions. Barcelona. Google Scholar

109.

T. Piersma , A. Dekinga , J. A. Van Gils , B. Achterkamp and G. H. Visser 2003. Costbenefit analysis of mollusc-eating in a shorebird I. Foraging and processing costs estimated by the doubly labelled water method. Journal of Experimental Biology , 206: 3361–3368. Google Scholar

110.

T. Piersma , L. Bruinzeel , R. Drent , M. Kersten , J. Van Der Meer And S. Portugal , J. A. Green and P. J. Butler 2007. Annual changes in body mass and resting metabolism in captive barnacle geese (Branta leucopsis): the importance of wing moult. Journal of Experimental Biology , 210: 1391–1397. Google Scholar

111.

J. R. Purdue and H. Haines 1977. Salt water tolerance and water turnover in the snowy plover. Auk , 94: 248–255. Google Scholar

112.

P. Quillfeldt , E. Arriero , J. Martínez , J. F. Masello and S. Merino 2011. Prevalence of blood parasites in seabirds — a review. Frontiers in Zoology , 8: 26. Google Scholar

113.

H. Rahn and G. C. Whittow 1984. Comparison of embryonic development in birds and mammals: birth weight, time and cost. In, C. R. Taylor , K. Johanssen and L. Bollis (Eds.): A Comparison to Animal Physiology , pp. 124–137. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Google Scholar

114.

N. O. M. Ravenscroft and C. H. Beardall 2003. The importance of freshwater flows over estuarine mudflats for wintering waders and wildfowl. Biological Conservation , 113: 89–97. Google Scholar

115.

M. M. Rehfisch and H. Q. P. Crick 2003. Predicting the impact of climatic change on Arctic-breeding waders. Wader Study Group Bulletin , 100: 86–95. Google Scholar

116.

M. M. Rehfisch , G. E. Austin , S. N. Freeman , M. J. S. Armitage and N. H. K. Burton 2004. The possible impact of climate change on the future distributions and numbers of waders on Britain's non-estuarine coast. Ibis , 146: 70–81. Google Scholar

117.

J. Ro and J. B. Williams 2010. Respiratory and cutaneous water loss of temperate-zone passerine birds. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology , 156: 237–246. Google Scholar

118.

J. R. Roberts and M. R. Hughes 1984. Saline acclimation and water and sodium transport across avian small intestine. American Journal of Physiology , 247: R246–R249. Google Scholar

119.

M. A. Rubega 1997. Surface tension prey transport in shorebirds: How widespread is it? Ibis , 139: 488–493. Google Scholar

120.

M. A. Rubega and J. A. Robinson 1997. Water salinization and shorebirds: emerging issues. International Wader Studies , 9: 45–54. Google Scholar

121.

M. A. Rubega and C. Inouye 1994. Prey switching in red-necked phalaropes Phalaropus lobatus: Feeding limitations, the functional response and water Management at Mono Lake, California, USA. Biological Conservation , 70: 205–210. Google Scholar

122.

P. Sabat 2000. Birds in marine and saline environments: living in dry habitats. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural , 73: 401–410. Google Scholar

123.

P. Sabat , K. Maldonado , A. Rivera-Hutinel and G. Farfan , 2004. Coping with salt without salt glands: osmoregulatory plasticity in three species of coastal songbirds (ovenbirds) of the genus Cinclodes (Passeriformes: Furnariidae). Comparative and Biochemical Physiology B, 174: 415–420. Google Scholar

124.

P. Sabat , K. Maldonado , M. Canals and C. Martínez del Rio 2006a. Osmoregulation and adaptive radiation in the ovenbird genus Cinclodes (Passeriformes: Furnariidae). Functional Ecology , 20: 799–805. Google Scholar

125.

P. Sabat , K. Maldonado , J. M. Fariña and C. Martínez del Río 2006b Osmoregulatory capacity and the ability to use marine food sources in two coastal songbirds (Cinclodes: Furnariidae) along a latitudinal gradient. Oecologia , 148: 250–257. Google Scholar

126.

K. Schmidt-Nielsen 1959. Salt glands. Scientific American , 200: 109–116. Google Scholar

127.

K. Schmidt-Nielsen 1960. The salt-secreting gland of marine birds. Circulation , 21: 955–967. Google Scholar

128.

K. Schmidt-Nielsen 1997. Animal Physiology: Adaptation and Environment. Cambridge University Press. New York. Google Scholar

129.

K Schmidt-Nielsen and R. Fange 1958. Salt glands in marine reptiles. Nature , 182: 783–785. Google Scholar

130.

K. Schmidt-Nielsen and Y. T. Kim 1964. The effect of salt intake on the size and function of the salt gland of ducks. Auk , 81: 60–172. Google Scholar

131.

K. Schmidt-Nielsen , C. B. Jörgensen and H. Osaki 1957. Secretion of hypertonic solutions in marine birds. Federation Proceedings , 16: 113. Google Scholar

132.

K. Schmidt-Nielsen , C. B. Jörgensen and H. Osaki 1958. Extrarenal salt excretion in birds. American Journal of Physiology , 193: 101–107. Google Scholar

133.

K. Schmidt-Nielsen , A. Borut , P. Lee and E. C. Crawford 1963. Nasal salt excretion and the possible function of the cloaca in water conservation. Science , 142: 1300–1301. Google Scholar

134.

T. J. Shuttleworth and J. P. Hildebrandt 1999. Vertebrate salt glands: short- and longterm regulation of function. Journal of Experimental Zoology , 283: 689–701. Google Scholar

135.

N. R. Senner 2012. One species but two patterns: populations of the Hudsonian godwit (Limosa haemastica) differ in spring migration timing. Auk , 129: 670–682. Google Scholar

136.

E. Simon 1982. The osmoregulatory system of birds with salt glands. Comparative and Biochemical Physiology , 71A: 547–556. Google Scholar

137.

E. Skadhauge 1981. Osmoregulation in Birds. Springer-Verlag. Berlin. Google Scholar

138.

H. Staaland 1967. Anatomical and physiological adaptations of the nasal glands in Charadriiformes birds. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology , 23: 933–944. Google Scholar

139.

P. D. Sturkie 1976. Kidneys, extrarenal salt excretion, and urine. In, (Ed. P. D. Sturkie ): Avian Physiology , pp. 264–285. Springer-Verlag. New York. Google Scholar

140.

G. Technau 1936. Die Nasendrüse der Vögel. Journal für Ornithologie , 84: 511. Google Scholar

141.

Y. Tseng and P. Hwang 2008. Some insights into energy metabolism for osmoregulation in fish. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology , 148C: 419–429. Google Scholar

142.

Y. Verkuil , T. M. Van der Have , J. Van der Winden and I.I. Chernichko 2003. Habitat use and diet selection of northward migrating waders in the Sivash (Ukraine): the use of brine shrimp Artemia salina in a variably saline lagoon complex. Ardea , 91: 71–83. Google Scholar

143.

F. Vézina , K. M. Jalvingh , A. Dekinga and T. Piersma 2006. Acclimation to different thermal conditions in a northerly wintering shorebird is driven by body mass-related changes in organ size. Journal of Experimental Biology. 209: 3141–3154. Google Scholar

144.

F. Vézina , A. Gustowska , K. M. Jalvingh , O. Chastel and T. Piersma 2009. Hormonal correlates and thermoregulatory consequences of molting on metabolic rate in a northerly wintering shorebird. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology , 82: 129–142. Google Scholar

145.

M. C. Woodin 1994. Use of saltwater and freshwater habitats by wintering redheads in southern Texas. Hidrobiologia , 279–280: 279–287. Google Scholar

146.

E. Yohannes , A. Križanauskienè , M. Valcu , S. Bensch and B. Kempenaers 2009. Prevalence of malaria and related haemosporidian parasites in two shorebird species with different winter habitat distribution. Journal of Ornithology , 150: 287–291. Google Scholar

147.

T. Ysebaert , P. L. Meininger , K. Meire, P, Devos , C. M. Berrevoets , R. C. W. Strucker and E. Kuijken 2000. Waterbird communities along the estuarine salinity gradient of the Schelde estuary, NW- Europe. Biodiversity and Conservation , 9: 1275–1296. Google Scholar

148.

T Ysebaert , P. M. J. Herman , P. Meire , J. Craeymeersch , H. Verbeek and C. H. R. Heip 2003. Large-scale spatial patterns in estuaries: estuarine macrobenthic communities in the Schelde estuary, NW Europe. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science , 57: 335–355. Google Scholar

149.

A. J. Zera and L. G. Harshman 2001. The physiology of life history trade-offs in animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics , 32: 95–126. Google Scholar

150.

L. Zwarts , A. M. Blomert and R. Hupkes 1990. Increase of feeding time in waders preparing for spring migration from the Banc d'Arguin, Mauritania. Ardea , 78: 237–256. Google Scholar
Jorge S. Gutiérrez "Living in Environments with Contrasting Salinities: A Review of Physiological and Behavioural Responses in Waterbirds," Ardeola 61(2), 233-256, (1 December 2014). https://doi.org/10.13157/arla.61.2.2014.233
Received: 1 July 2013; Accepted: 1 April 2014; Published: 1 December 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
24 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top