Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2015 Sparrow Plagues in Extremadura (Western Spain) Over Four Centuries (1501–1900): A Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Records From Historical Archives
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Some bird species can cause crop damage but the historical variation in the incidence of such events is poorly documented. We analyse the spatio-temporal variation of damage attributed to sparrows (Passer domesticus, P. hispaniolensis and/or P. montanus) at a regional scale in Extremadura (western Spain) over four centuries (1501–1900). Textual data were extracted from historical documentary sources using over 12,000 Books of Accords (Libros de Acuerdos) belonging to 203 municipal archives. Sparrow agricultural damages were estimated from reported actions to control sparrow populations and two simple indices were constructed to analyse the spatial (PIM) and temporal (PIY) variation in sparrow plagues. We used these indices to fit geostatistical models and analyse time curves. We found 251 accords reporting sparrow plagues, distributed across 236 years and involving 47 municipalities. Most of these reports (97.2%) were mandatory impositions (repartimientos) on residents to deliver a certain number of dead sparrows within a fixed period, under penalty of a fine or imprisonment. Results show a significant spatio-temporal variation in sparrow plagues, which we tentatively relate to dynamic environmental and agroecological factors. The spatial index showed high values (PIM > 4) in certain cereal-producing areas, among which La Raya zone located in western Badajoz province was the best example. The temporal index reached maximum values (PIY = 7.3) in the mid 18th century (1741–1770), probably because this was a milder period (within the so-called Little Ice Age) coinciding with increased food availability for birds. In addition, we also examine some sociopolitical, economic and historical features that could have shaped the plague indices. We particularly discuss the normative and legislative developments (e.g. mandatory impositions), the municipal activity itself (affected by wars and other historical events) and the bird conservation interest (which flourished during the final quarter of the 19th century). We conclude that textual data-based indices provide a suitable historical perspective of the agricultural impact of sparrows in Extremadura and of human perceptions of them.

Introduction

Some bird species are known to cause crop damage and their harmful effects have been reported worldwide from historical times and even from the beginning of agriculture (Jones, 1972; Bucher and Bedano, 1976; Wright et al., 1980; Dhindsa and Saini, 1994; Huber et al., 2002; Contreras et al., 2003; Tracey et al., 2007; De Mey et al., 2012; Monge, 2013). In the Iberian Peninsula, the main species accused of damaging crops belong to the families Passeridae, Corvidae, Sturnidae, Gruidae and Turdidae (Bernis, 1989a, 1989b; Sánchez-Guzmán et al., 1993; Tellería et al., 1999; MAPA, 2001; Martí and Del Moral, 2003; SEO/BirdLife, 2012). Some studies have shown that birds such as sparrows (Passeridae) have been perceived as problematic since at least the late Middle Ages (Caneres, 1946; Zamora, 2004). Regrettably, the impact of bird plagues and their crop damages in the past are not well documented, since the historical information available is very scattered in the scientific literature, often included within collateral studies of a diverse nature, and quite heterogeneous as a result of the diverse documentary sources.

Ferrero-García et al. (2014) applied a novel approach to study the bird species reported as harmful in Extremadura (western Spain) over four centuries (1501-1900). Spanish Municipalities have recorded in their archives, and particularly in their Books of Accords (the so-called Libros de Acuerdos; BAs hereafter), the impact of the most important agricultural pests, birds included, to promote appropriate control measures in the exercise of their jurisdiction. Such ornithological information presents major documentary advantages: it is reliable and verified (official public documentation), homogeneous and geographically delimited (produced by each municipality), ongoing and regular in time (municipal sessions are held throughout the year), it covers an extended historical period (the BAs originated in the late Middle Ages and are still used today) and, above all, these textual data are amenable to quantification and statistical analysis (Torres-Vila and Sánchez González, 2007).

Analysing vernacular bird names used in the Books of Accords, Ferrero-Garcia et al. (2014) were able to document between 13 and 16 bird genera reported as harmful, belonging to eight families: Passeridae, Columbidae, Corvidae, Alaudidae, Phasianidae, Emberizidae, Turdidae and Gruidae. Sparrows were by far considered to be the most harmful birds, figuring within about 70% of the accords recorded. These authors also show that the Spanish vernacular names gorriones, pardales, gorriatos and gurriatos are closely associated in Extremadura with the following species of the genus Passer: the house sparrow P. domesticus, the Spanish sparrow P. hispaniolensis and to a lesser extent, the Eurasian tree sparrow P. montanus. Moreover, these authors revealed that the sparrows actually damaged some crops -mainly cereals- that were staples for human subsistence during a period characterised by low agricultural yields. It follows that this constraint would explain the perception of sparrows as authentic pests. Ferrero-García et al. (2014) also recall how this negative perception of sparrows was reflected in Spain; in hunting laws, law treatises, emerging ornithological researches and even popular books, and how such attitudes only began to change during the second half of the 19th century.

In the present work we expand these results by analysing the spatial distribution and temporal variation in Extremadura over four centuries (1501–1900) of sparrow plagues or, put more precisely, of the human perception of sparrows as potential pests. We then discuss the environmental and agroecological factors potentially involved in the spatio-temporal incidence of sparrow plagues, considering also other relevant socioeconomic, administrative and historical factors, including the emergence of novel conservation measures in the second half of the 19th century. To our knowledge, this is the first time that bird plagues -and more generally agricultural plagues—have been studied at a regional scale through the rigorous quantification and statistical analysis of textual data extracted from historical documentary sources.

Material and methods

Documentary sources and data acquisition

The main documentary sources were the municipal Books of Accords (BAs). The BAs consist of the agreements (ordered by sessions) adopted by municipalities regarding matters within their legislative, executive and judicial jurisdiction, including those related to crop pest damage -bird damage included— and measures for pest control. In a number of cases, especially if BAs were lacking, raw data compilation was improved with ancillary information from other municipal archive files if available (e.g. account books, reports, provisions, decisions, writs, ordinances and miscellaneous papers). The BAs are an indispensable tool for the study of regional, district and local history, especially in rural areas (Torres-Vila and Sánchez-González, 2007).

We reviewed almost 12,000 BAs (more than a million pages) each including one year's accords, belonging to 190 municipalities within the current boundaries of Extremadura (i.e., about half of the existing municipalities). The sample studied was complemented with 13 additional municipalities, given their historical interest and/or geographical position, located in six of the seven neighbouring provinces, namely: Santa Olalla del Cala (Huelva); Alanís, Guadalcanal and El Real de la Jara (Sevilla); Belalcázar (Córdoba); Almadén and Chillón (Ciudad Real); Oropesa and Torralba de Oropesa (Toledo); La Alberca, Béjar and Ciudad Rodrigo (Salamanca); as well as Eivas (Alentejo) in Portugal (fig. 1). In most historical archives the original BAs were consulted and the relevant agreements photographed for later transcription, which was especially necessary with paleographic texts in older BAs. Digital reproductions of BAs were also used where available online or on disk. The reading effort (i.e., the number of BAs consulted) was increased in those municipalities that conserved older documentation (usually historic towns) and in those geographical areas where there was evidence of recurrent bird plagues.

Data analysis

We used two indices to model the intensity of sparrow damage (namely sparrow plagues): 1) the spatial variation among municipalities (PIM), and 2) the temporal variation among years (PIY). Both PIM and PIY are simple indices representing relative frequencies, so that their values range between 0 and 100%.

For the spatial analysis, PIM was calculated for each of the 203 municipalities studied as: PIM = 100 Yp / Ye where Yp = the number of years with at least one sparrow plague in a given municipality, and Ye = the number of years with available data for that municipality (i.e. sample size).

The spatial variation in PIM was analysed with geostatistical techniques by using ArcGIS software (version 10.1, ESRI Inc., Redlands, CA, USA). We calculated PIM values both for the whole study period and for each century (16th, 17th, 18th and 19th centuries). We then modelled the spatial ocurrence of sparrow plagues using the geographical position of the municipalities as the explanatory variable. The surface area of each municipality was calculated using tools of the module ArcToolbox in ArcGIS and the centroid of each polygon was used to model intra-zonal variation. The geographic coordinate system used was datum WGS 1984 projected in the UTM zone 30N. Interpolation analyses to predict PIM values at locations without data were conducted with the Geostatistical Analyst extension of ArcGIS by using radial basis functions (RBF). The RBF methods are exact interpolators that enable a surface to be created that captures global trends and picks up local variation. A number of splines with tension and multiquadric RBF were fitted to the spatial database and cross-validation was used to select the best function (Johnston et al., 2001). After cross-validation to estimate the optimal parameters controlling the surface smoothness for each RBF, root-mean-squared prediction errors were lower than 2.5 in all cases, so that models and their associated parameters predicted the measured values very accurately. A set of map layers was finally generated with the ArcGIS ArcMap module (Moral, 2003).

Fig. 1.

Municipalities of Extremadura and neighbouring municipalities (n = 203) used in the spatio-temporal analysis of sparrow (Passeridae) plagues. The antiquity of the available documentary sources is also indicated for each municipality.

[Municipios de Extremadura y municipios vecinos (n = 203) utilizados en los análisis espacio-temporales de las plagas de gorriones (Passeridae). La antigüedad de las fuentes documentales disponibles se indica también para cada municipio.]

f01_00.jpg

Regarding the temporal analysis, PIY was calculated for each of the 400 years studied as: PIY = 100 Mp / Me where Mp = the number of municipalities reporting sparrow plagues in a given year, and Me = the number of municipalities with available data for that year (i.e. sample size).

In order to aid the interpretation of the temporal variation in PIY, we averaged PIY values by natural decades. Significant differences between decades within centuries (or for the total sample) were tested with the Kruskal-Wallis test by using SYSTAT software (version 10.0, Systat Software, Richmond, CA, USA).

Results

Sample size and agreement typology PIM

We found 251 accords reporting sparrow plagues, covering 236 years and originating from 47 municipalities (table 1), so that some BAs included more than one accord on sparrow plagues per year. Nearly a quarter of the municipalities studied (47 of 203, 23.2%) reported at least one sparrow plague during their history (table 1). As would be expected given the vagaries of history, the greater antiquity of the target BAs within the period studied (1501–1900), the fewer municipal archives and BAs available (table 1). No information on sparrows in the 16th century was found so this century was not represented (fig. 2). Another 41 agreements citing unspecified birds (mentioning pájaros or similar words with small spelling variations) were not considered in this study since they could not certainly be attributed to sparrows (Ferrero-García et al., 2014).

Of the 251 agreements reporting sparrows, 244 (97.2%) were related to the so-called repartimientos, that is, mandatory impositions on the town or village inhabitants to capture and deliver a predetermined number of dead birds (or their equivalent in eggs, chicks or nests) to the municipal Authorities within a strict time period, under penalty of a fine or imprisonment. In a number of municipalities, such mandatory impositions were equitably divided between residents depending on their job/activity (farmer, labourer, farmhand), income/rent (size and number of oxen owned, cultivated land area) and even civil status (widows often benefited from a reduction). The remaining seven agreements (2.8%, 7 of 251) concerned prizes for voluntary delivery of sparrows or preventing damage to house roofs.

Table 1

Summary of the studied sample by centuries, indicating the number of Books of Accords, municipalities, agreements and years. The percentage of municipalities reporting sparrow plagues is also given.

[Resumen de la muestra estudiada por siglos, indicando el número de Libros de Acuerdos, municipios, acuerdos y años. También se señala el porcentaje de municipios con plagas de gorriones.]

t01_00.gif

Fig. 2.

Spatial variation of sparrow (Passeridae) plagues in Extremadura in the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries (and averaged data) according to the plague index PIM. The geostatistical analyses were computed using radial basis functions (RBF) with ArcGIS software.

[Variación espacial de las plagas de gorriones (Passeridae) en Extremadura en los siglos XVII, XVIII y XIX (y datos promediados) según el índice de plaga PIM. Los análisis geoestadísticos se computaron usando funciones de base radial (FBR) con el software ArcGIS.]

f02_00.jpg

Spatial variation of sparrow plagues (PIM)

Sparrow incidence (as indicated by PIM values) proved to be more or less consistent over centuries in some areas (fig. 2). Very high values (PIM > 4%) occurred in all centuries in the western area of Badajoz province bordering Portugal (covering the so-called La Raya zone). This area takes in several municipalities including at least in part (from north to south) Valencia de Alcántara, La Codosera, Albuquerque, Badajoz, Eivas (Portugal), Olivenza, Almendral, Cheles, Alconchel, Barcarrota, Villanueva del Fresno and Jerez de los Caballeros. In the 17th and 18th centuries high values (PIM = 2–4% or higher) also occurred in a belt of territory extending westwards across the municipalities of La Roca de la Sierra and Puebla de Obando, as far as the south of Cáceres province; this belt expanded greatly during the 18th century to include Mérida and nearby municipalities. In the 18th and 19th centuries sparrow incidence also expanded towards southwestern Badajoz province, reaching very high values (PIM > 4%) in Jerez de los Caballeros, Fregenal de la Sierra and some other adjacent municipalities; in the 18th century the sparrow incidence also extended towards the centre of Badajoz province, reaching Valencia del Ventoso, Zafra and Los Santos de Maimona. There were also other areas with high incidence values (PIM = 2–4% or higher) but where sparrows occurred less consistently over time. They included: 1) in the 17th century, an area in eastern Cáceres province centred on Navalmoral de la Mata and extending towards the lands of Oropesa in Toledo; 2) also in the 17th century, a small island-shaped area in the Campiña Sur zone at Llerena, in southeastern Badajoz province; 3) in the 18th century, a narrow and irregular strip on the eastern border of Badajoz province, from La Siberia in the north (extending towards Chillón and Almadén in Ciudad Real) and crossing La Serena, to reach the Campiña Sur zone at Azuaga in the south (and extending towards Alanís and Guadalcanal in Sevilla); and 4) in the 19th century, two island-shaped areas: the first quite a large expanse in the lands of Trujillo in Cáceres province, centred on Aldeacentenera, Herguijuela, Zorita and Conquista de la Sierra, and extending northwards as far as Belvís de Monroy and southwards to Logrosán and Madrigalejo, reaching the Guadiana river valley; the second a smaller area in central Badajoz province in the Guadiana river valley (Mérida and Villagonzalo districts) (fig. 2).

Temporal variation of sparrow plagues (PIY)

The PIY index showed large fluctuations over time even between consecutive years, with values exceeding 10% in ten years concentrated in the 18th century (fig. 3). A Kruskal-Wallis test shows significant differences between decades within centuries (17th: H9 = 35.56, P < 0.001,18th: H9 = 28.84, P < 0.001, 19th: H9 = 29.14, P < 0.001) as well as across the whole period studied (16th–19th centuries: H39 = 195.05, P < 0.001). The analysis of means by decades also highlights some interesting trends (fig. 3). There was a progressive increase in the PIY index from the early 18th century over seven decades (1701-1770), with values higher than PIY = 5% in the last three decades (1741-1770), to finally reach an absolute maximum (PIY = 7.3). In the period 1791– 1830 there were high and relatively constant means by decades (PIY = 3.8–4.6) and in the period 1671-1700 a similar plateau occurred with slightly lower values (PIY = 2.6–3.3).

Fig. 3.

Temporal variation of sparrow (Passeridae) plagues in Extremadura during the 16th to 19th centuries according to the plague index PIY.

[Variación temporal de las plagas de gorriones (Passeridae) en Extremadura durante los siglos XVI a XIX según el índice de plaga PIY.]

f03_00.jpg

On the other hand, the lack of any accords concerning sparrow plagues from 1501 to 1634, and again from 1641 to 1670, is remarkable. This extended period of more than a century and a half was only interrupted in the 1630s when the first sparrow plagues were documented in Cáceres and Oropesa. The very low PIY values in the final two decades of the 19th century are also noteworthy (PIY < 0.5%). These minimum values occurred after a gradual decline over seven decades (1831-1900) in which all years had PIY < 6 %, a trend accentuated during the second half of the 19th century, during which PIY < 4% in all years.

Discussion

The results show that sparrows have been more abundant in a number of areas of Extremadura in historical times. The underlying ecological factors regulating population dynamics are difficult to explain, although greater food availability and favourable local climate should be considered as essential.

In the Iberian Peninsula, the diets of the house and Spanish sparrows are largely based on plant material, especially seeds and cultivated grains (Alonso, 1985; Sánchez-Aguado, 1986; Bernis, 1989b). The Eurasian tree sparrow is less reliant on cultivated than on wild seeds (Sánchez-Aguado, 1986). Nevertheless, almost all species of the genus Passer can aggregate in flocks and cause damage to crops (Bernis, 1989b). However, in recent years numerous studies have detected a significant decline in certain European bird species, including the house sparrow (Ferrero-García et al., 2014 and references therein). Extensive agriculture in Extremadura did not change much during the centuries studied with herbaceous crops, mainly cereals, prevailing (Rodríguez, 1985; Hernández and Pulido, 2004, 2005). It is interesting that the regions affected by sparrow plagues in Extremadura coincide precisely with areas of cereal crops, most of which still remain today: La Raya, Trujillo and Cáceres plains, Mérida, Tierra de Barros, Campo de Arañuelo, lands of Oropesa, La Siberia and Campiña Sur. The best example occurs in western Badajoz province (La Raya), where the occurrence of sparrow plagues has extended from historical times to the present. Thus, in the late 20th century there were numerous complaints from farmers concerning crop damage by the Spanish sparrow (Prieta, 2003). Regarding the house sparrow, it has been suggested that its overabundance in central Europe during the 18th–19th centuries was promoted by human activities (Herrmann and Woods, 2010). In Extremadura, the area with the highest winter abundance of this species at present is again La Raya (SEO/BirdLife, 2012). These two sparrow species are most probably those that damaged crops in Extremadura during the 17th–19th centuries (Ferrero-García et al., 2014). Circumstances may have been different in the past, but the above assumption is further supported by the fact that Extremadura currently harbours the largest breeding population of the Spanish sparrow and much of the house sparrow population in Spain (Carrascal and Palomino, 2008).

Maps showing the spatial distribution of sparrow damages were calculated for each century, so they are not confused by the large interannual variation observed in sparrow population densities within centuries. For example, the remarkable population growth of the Spanish sparrow in Extremadura in the late 20th century occurred after the species had become restricted to the Zújar river valley (eastern Badajoz province) during the 1960s and 1970s (Martí and Del Moral, 2003). The huge interannual fluctuations in Spanish sparrow populations had already caught the attention of ornithologists and it has been suggested that this species may have had a greater presence in the Iberian Peninsula in the past (Alonso, 1997). Both the house sparrow and the Eurasian tree sparrow also exhibit lesser but still significant population fluctuations (Tellería et al., 1999).

The highest historical incidence of sparrow plagues within the period studied occurred in the mid 18th century (c. 1741–1770), coinciding with a slightly warmer period within the cold period termed the Little Ice Age (LIA), which took place in Europe between the early 14th century and the mid- 19th century. In the Iberian Peninsula, the coldest LIA episodes occurred in the 17th century (De Castro et al., 2005), with maximum glacial expansion between the late 17th century and the early 18th century (González Trueba et al., 2008), the climate becoming milder in the mid-18th century (González Trueba et al, 2005; Fagan, 2008). It is well known that low temperatures and associated factors (ice, snow, insufficient food) negatively affect bird species (Newton, 1998), especially those of smaller body size (Señar and Borras, 2004). For example, adverse weather conditions may cause high mortality in some Spanish populations of the Eurasian tree sparrow (Cordero and Salaet, 1990) whereas house sparrow survival increases in mild winters (Senar and Copete, 1995). It has also been suggested that milder weather, among other factors, may account for the late 20th century population explosion of the Spanish sparrow in Extremadura (Prieta, 2003).

The temperature increase in the mid 18th century has also been put forward to explain the proliferation of the mediterranean locust Dociostaurus maroccanus (Alberola, 2012) that affected Extremadura and Spain in 1754-1757 (Azcárate, 1997; Torres-Vila and Sánchez-González, 2007; Mas, 2012). More benign temperatures favouring the proliferation of insects (particularly locusts and other acridids) could in turn provide an additional feeding resource for sparrows. In fact, acridid species contribute significantly to the diet of Spanish sparrow chicks in some Portuguese populations (Marques et al., 2003). Moreover, in the 18th century, agriculture in Extremadura experienced some expansion of certain crops, including cereals (Sánchez Salazar, 1988). In conclusion, we suggest that the greater abundance of sparrows in the mid 18th century could be the result of favourable weather and increased food availability.

In addition, other non-environmental factors could have shaped the incidence of sparrows (as measured by plague indices) both in space and time. The most important additional factors that we have detected are: the normative and legislative development over time, the municipal activity itself and the bird conservation interest, which we discuss below.

No similar quantitative studies exist for other regions but the available information implies that the historical situation in the rest of Spain should be very similar to that observed in Extremadura. Mandatory impositions of bird culls (mainly of sparrows) were common in the 17th–19th centuries in many Spanish provinces, such as Álava (López, 1957), Córdoba (Arjona and Estrada, 1977), Albacete (Gómez and Cebrián, 1987), Huelva (De Vega, 1990), Jaén (Torres, 2005) and Málaga (García Guillén, 2009). Conversely, references to crop damage by birds are less frequent prior to the 17th century. The few references we have been able to document do not mention mandatory impositions, but rather incentives in the form of prizes, such as in Murcia in the 14th and 16th centuries (Zamora, 2004) and Valencia in the 15th century (Carreres, 1946). This suggests that the absence of accords on sparrow plagues before the 1630s in Extremadura, could reflect the lack of local (and national) norms concerning mandatory impositions to control birds (Ferrero-Garcia et al., 2014). In fact, no historical legislation related to control of harmful birds has been documented. We suggest that the first municipal edicts of bird culls became gradually widespread from the early 17th century by emulating the impositions against locust plagues established by the pioneering Law of 1593, promulgated under the reign of Felipe II (NRLE, 1805, book VII), a provision whose crucial importance (principally for crop protection) has been highlighted many times (EUIEA, 1920; Márquez, 1963; León, 2005; Peris, 2008). An agreement of 7 May 1638 from the Council of Cáceres regarding a mandatory cull of sparrows (the first documented in Extremadura) supports this idea. In order to counter damage to barley and wheat crops, the Council ordered the killing of sparrows “in the manner and with the expense usually used to kill the locust” (“en la forma y con el horden y costa que se suele matar la langosta”).

The sociopolitical situation may also have influenced plague indices, by diverting municipal activity towards other matters and even by interrupting it (Ferrero-Garcia et al., 2014). The best -and most tragic- example we found are the wars. For instance, in Ubeda (Jaén) the mandatory sparrow culls were interrupted during several years as a result of the war in the early 18th century (Torres, 2005). In the same manner, the long conflict between Portugal and Spain (1640–1668), one of the most destructive of European history that century, greatly affected Extremadura (García Barriga, 2008) and could have been responsible for the zero values of the plague index detected for 1641–1670 in our study. Similarly, the atypically low values (PIY = 0.8%) found in the 1700s could be explained by the scarcity of accords due to the disastrous effects of the Spanish Succession War in Extremadura (Muñoz, 1948; Sánchez Rubio, 2010).

Lastly, the bird conservation interest could also influence the plague indices. A gradual and positive societal change in attitudes to birds could be involved in the progressive decline in PIY values from 1830s onwards. Such a decline took place despite both the slight increase in cereal cultivation in that period (Hernández and Pulido, 2005) and the milder weather during the second half of the 19th century, when the LIA had already ended (De Castro et al., 2005).

In the early 19th century, the Spanish legislation still reflected the need to eliminate sparrows; for instance hunting regulations (Ordenanza de Caza de 1804) and people show the same negative attitude (Torres-Vila et al., 2009; Ferrero-García et al, 2014). Mandatory quotas of birds to prevent crop damage were customary and nearly compulsory for municipal Councils (Ferrero-García et al., 2014). In the 1840s, coinciding with the transition from the Old Regime to the Liberal State, people begin to recognise that such practices should be curtailed, being considered more typical of an oppressive administration rather than one interested in agricultural development (Ortiz de Zúñiga, 1841). In fact, the hunting regulations adopted in 1834–1837 were based on more democratic principles (Nieto, 2001).

Interest in the conservation of insectivorous birds increased during the second half of the 19th century, when the first norms for wildlife preservation were adopted in many European countries (eg. Perrero-García, 2013). In Spain, hunting legislation (Ley de Caza de 1879) established some general protection measures, which were expanded and developed in 1896 (Torres-Vila et al., 2009; Ferrero-García, 2010, 2011; Casado, 2013). Lengthy negotiations carried out from 1868, with the participation of leading naturalists, experts and European politicians, came to fruition in the 1902 International Convention for the Protection of Useful birds to Agriculture, signed in Paris on 19 March 1902 (van Heijnsbergen, 1997; Bowman et al., 2010; Ferrero-García, 2013, 2014), in which Spain was also involved (Ferrero-García, 2012b). In addition, such institutions as the Sociedad Valenciana de Agricultores in 1866 (Azcárate, 1997), and such eminent scientists and technicians as M. P. Graells, A. García Maceira and J. Arévalo Baca in the 1880s, encouraged the protection of insectivorous birds, including the Passeridae (Ferrero-García, 2012a; Balset, 2012; Ferrero-García et al., 2014). Even the daily press echoed the need to defend sparrows (La Vanguardia, 1886). It is noteworthy that these positive developments increased during the late 19th century, precisely the period in which the lowest plague indices were recorded in our study. In Spain, despite initial debates, the laws on the protection of useful fauna finally included —albeit partly— the Passeridae (Torres-Vila et al., 2009; Ferrero-García et al., 2014). In Extremadura, also during the last quarter of 19th century, some authorities, such as Agustín Salido, Civil Governor of the Badajoz province, promoted measures for bird preservation (Torres-Vila et al., 2009) and several municipalities established additional protection norms (Ferrero-García et al., 2014). Therefore, we suggest that from the 1830s onwards the new Liberal State could begin to reduce the old practice of mandatory bird culls, a trend that would increase progressively throughout the late 19th century as a result of new environmental awareness. Although it has been suggested that the real impact of the pioneering conservation laws and conventions was very limited (Ferrero-García, 2010; Bowman, 2014), our results suggest that the first conservation standards adopted in Extremadura and Spain had “useful” consequences for the preservation of some bird species.

Acknowledgements. —

This study would have been unfeasible without the dedication, engagement, perseverance and willingness of the colleagues who are, or have been, members of the Sección de Protección Integrada (Servicio de Sanidad Vegetal): Y. Conejo, E. Cruces, J. A. Rebollo, F. Barrena, J. Merino, F. Fernández, F. Rodríguez and F. Ponce. Our most enthusiastic and sincere thanks to all of them! The authors also greatly acknowledge two anonymous reviewers for providing constructive comments and Dr. Ernest Garcia for improving the English. This work was supported by the Servicio de Sanidad Vegetal (SSV), Gobierno de Extremadura.

Bibliography

1.

A. Alebrola 2012. Plagas de langosta y clima en la España del siglo XVIII. Relaciones , 129: 21–50. Google Scholar

2.

J. C. Alonso 1985. La alimentación del gorrión común (Passer domesticus) en áreas de cultivo de regadío extremeñas. Ardeola , 32: 405–408. Google Scholar

3.

J. C. Alonso 1997. Gorrión moruno Passer hispaniolensis. In, F. J. Purroy (Coord.): Atlas de las Aves de España (1975–1995) , pp. 498–499. Lyns Edicions. Barcelona. Google Scholar

4.

A. Arjona and V. Estrada 1977. Historia de la Villa de Luque. Ediciones Escudero. Córdoba. Google Scholar

5.

I. Azcárate 1997. Plagas Agrícolas y Forestales en España en los siglos XVIII y XIX. (Serie Estudios, n° 131). Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación. Madrid. Google Scholar

6.

J. Balset 2012. Antonio García Maceira, un defensor de la fauna insectívora. Quercus , 319: 36–44. Google Scholar

7.

F. Bernis 1989a. Los Estorninos en las Mesetas Españolas. (Comunicaciones INIA. Serie Recursos Naturales). Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación. Madrid. Google Scholar

8.

F. Bernis 1989b. Los Gorriones. Con Especial Referencia a su Distribución y Eto-ecología en las Mesetas Españolas. (Comunicaciones INIA. Serie Recursos Naturales). Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación. Madrid. Google Scholar

9.

M. J. Bowman 2014. The 1902 Convention for the Protection of Birds in historical and juridical perspective. Ardeola , 61: 171–196. Google Scholar

10.

M. Bowman , P. Davies and C. Redgwel 2010. Lyster's International Wildlife Law. Second Edition. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Google Scholar

11.

E. H. Bucher and P. E. Bedano 1976. Bird damage problems in Argentina. Internacional Studies on Sparrows , 9: 3–16. Google Scholar

12.

L. M. Carrascal and D. Palomino 2008. Las Aves Comunes Reproductoras en España. Población en 2004–2006. SEO/BirdLife. Madrid. Google Scholar

13.

S. Carreres 1946. La caza en Valencia. Algunas notas medievales. Montes , 12: 563–565. Google Scholar

14.

S. Casado 2013. The importance of being listed: birds, lists and the history conservation. Ardeola , 60: 397–401. Google Scholar

15.

A. J. Contreras , A. G. Tejeda and J. A. García 2003. Las aves como plaga, controles y manejo. Ciencia UANL, 6: 93–98. Google Scholar

16.

P. J. Cordero and M. Salaet 1990. Breeding season, population density and reproductive rate of the tree sparrow (Passer montanus) in Barcelona, NE Spain. In, J. Pinowski and J. D. Summers-Smith (Eds.): Granivorous Birds in the Agricultural Landscape , pp. 169–177. Polish Scientific Publishers. Varsovia. Google Scholar

17.

M. De Castro , J. Martín-Vide and S. Alonso 2005. El clima en España: pasado, presente y escenarios de clima para el siglo XXI. In, J. M. Moreno (Coord.): Evaluación Preliminar de los Impactos en España por Efecto del Cambio Climático , pp. 1–64. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente. Madrid. Google Scholar

18.

Y. De Mey , M. Demont and M. Diagne 2012. Estimating bird damage to rice in Africa: evidence from the Senegal River Valley. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63:175–200. Google Scholar

19.

J. De Vega 1990. Aproximación socioeconómica a la villa de Huelva en la segunda mitad del siglo XVIII. Huelva en su historia, 3: 303–375. Google Scholar

20.

M. S. Dhindsa and H. K. Saini 1994. Agricultural ornithology: an Indian perspective. Journal of Biosciences, 19: 391–402. Google Scholar

21.

EUIEA. 1920. Enciclopedia Universal Ilustrada Europea Americana. Tomo XXIX. Hijos de J. Espasa. Barcelona. Google Scholar

22.

B. Fagan 2008. La Pequeña Edad de Hielo. Editorial Gedisa, S.A. Barcelona. Google Scholar

23.

J. J. Ferrero-García 2010. La conservación de las aves en la España de la Restauración. Quercus , 294: 22–29. Google Scholar

24.

J. J. Ferrero-García 2011. El primer catálogo español de especies protegidas (1896): análisis de su contenido y autoría de Graells. Graellsia , 67: 103–107. Google Scholar

25.

J. J. Ferrero-García 2012a. Mariano de la Paz Graells y la protección de la fauna silvestre. Quercus , 312: 30–35. Google Scholar

26.

J. J. Ferrero-García 2012b. Contribución de Graells a la posición de España en el primer convenio internacional para la protección de ciertas especies de la fauna silvestre (1902). Graellsia , 68: 347–352. Google Scholar

27.

J. J. Ferrero-García 2013. The International Convention for the Protection of Birds (1902): a missed opportunity for wildlife conservation? Ardeola , 60: 385–396. Google Scholar

28.

J. J. Ferrero-García 2014. Aves y naturalistas: política y conservación en el siglo XIX. Quercus, 341: 22–31. Google Scholar

29.

J. J. Ferrero-García , D. Martín-Vertedor and L. M. Torres-Vila 2014. Incidencia histórica de las plagas de aves en la agricultura de Extremadura, España (siglos XVI–XIX). Boletín de la Real Sociedad Española de Historia Natural. Sección Biológica, 108: 5–20. Google Scholar

30.

F. García Barriga 2008. Sociedad y conflicto bélico en la Edad Moderna: Extremadura ante la Guerra con Portugal (1640–1668). Norba. Revista de Historia , 21: 29–47. Google Scholar

31.

B. García Guillén 2009. Coín y el Corregimiento de las Cuatro Villas de la Hoya de Málaga. Siglo XVII (Tesis doctoral). Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad de Málaga. Málaga. Google Scholar

32.

M. D. Gómez and A. Cebrián 1987. Antecedentes socioeconómicos del Oriente manchego (Villarrobledo-Albacete). Papeles de Geografía , 13: 127–140. Google Scholar

33.

J. J. González Trueba , R. Martín Moreno , E. Martínez de Pisón and E. Serrano 2008. ‘Little Ice Age’ glaciation and current glaciers in the Iberian Peninsula. The Holocene , 18: 551–568. Google Scholar

34.

J. J. González Trueba , R. Martín Moreno and E. Serrano 2005. El glaciarismo de la Pequeña Edad del Hielo en las Montañas Ibéricas. Síntesis y estado actual de conocimiento. Revista C & G , 21: 57–86. Google Scholar

35.

J. A. Hernández and F. Pulido 2004. Aproximación a la historia de la agricultura en Extremadura (II): de la Reconquista a los Austrias. In, J. M. Coleto , E. Musiera , R. González and F. Pulido (Eds.): La Agricultura y la Ganadería Extremeñas, Informe 2003 , pp. 197–215. Caja de Ahorros de Badajoz. Badajoz. Google Scholar

36.

J. A. Hernández and F. Pulido 2005. Aproximación a la historia de la agricultura en Extremadura (III): siglos XVIII y XIX. In, J. M. Coleto , E. Musiera , R. González and F. Pulido (Eds.): La Agricultura y la Ganadería Extremeñas, Informe 2004 , pp. 227–242. Caja de Ahorros de Badajoz. Badajoz. Google Scholar

37.

B. Herrmann and W. I. Woods 2010. Neither biblical plague nor pristine myth: a lesson from Central European sparrows. Geographical Review, 100: 176–186. Google Scholar

38.

D. M. Huber , M. E. Hugh-Jones, M. K. Rust , S. R. Sheffield , D. Simberloff and C. R. Taylor 2002. Invasive pest species: impacts on agriculture production, natural resources, and the environment. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, 20: 1–18. Google Scholar

39.

K. Johnston , J. M. Ver Hoef , K. Krivoruchko and N. Lucas 2001. Using ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst. Environmental Systems Research Institute. Redlands. CA. Google Scholar

40.

E. L. Jones 1972. The bird pests of British agriculture in recent centuries. Agricultural History Review , 20: 107–125. Google Scholar

41.

La Vanguardia . 1886. En defensa de los gorriones. La Vanguardia , 52 [01.02.1886]: 7. Google Scholar

42.

M. León 2005. Una simiente devastadora del agro antequerano: la plaga de langosta de 1620. Revista de Historia Moderna , 23: 285–306. Google Scholar

43.

G. López 1957. La caza en la montaña alavesa. Munibe , 9: 226–262. Google Scholar

44.

MAPA [Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación], 2001. Daños en la Agricultura Causados por Vertebrados. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación. Madrid. Google Scholar

45.

P. M. Marques , M. Boieiro , F. Canário and L. Vicente 2003. Variation of nestling diet across the breeding season in Spanish sparrow Passer hispaniolensis in southern Portugal. Ardeola , 50: 71–75. Google Scholar

46.

A. Márquez 1963. La Lucha contra la Langosta en México. Colegio de Ingenieros Agrónomos de México. México. Google Scholar

47.

R. Martí and J. C. Del Moral (Eds.). 2003. Atlas de las Aves Reproductoras de España. Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza-Sociedad Española de Ornitología. Madrid. Google Scholar

48.

C. Mas 2012. La gestion de la catástrofe. Acción estatal y lucha contra la plaga de langosta en las diócesis de Murcia y Orihuela (1756–1758). Relaciones , 129: 51–86. Google Scholar

49.

J. Monge 2013. Lista actualizada de aves dañinas en Costa Rica (2012). Research Journal of the Costa Rican Distance Education University , 5: 111–120. Google Scholar

50.

F. J. Moral 2003. La Representación Gráfica de las Variables Regionalizadas: Geoestadística Lineal. Universidad de Extremadura. Cáceres. Google Scholar

51.

M. Muñoz 1948. Documentos para la historia de la Guerra de Sucesión en Extremadura. Revista de Estudios Extremeños , 4: 95–145. Google Scholar

52.

I. Newton 1998. Population Limitation in Birds. Academic Press. San Diego. Google Scholar

53.

E. Nieto 2001. La Protección de la Fauna Salvaje en el Ordenamiento Jurídico Español. Ed. Lex Nova. Valladolid. Google Scholar

54.

NRLE. 1805. Novísima Recopilación de las Leyes de España. Dividida en XII libros. (Tomo III: libros VI y VII). Imprenta Real. Madrid. Google Scholar

55.

M. Ortiz de Zúñiga 1841. El Libro de los Alcaldes y Ayuntamientos. Tomo I. Imprenta y librería de don Manuel Sanz. Granada. Google Scholar

56.

F. J. Peris 2008. Apuntes sobre la lucha contra la plaga de langosta en los escritos de los siglos modernos. Tiempos modernos , 6 (17). Google Scholar

57.

J. Prieta (Ed.). 2003. Aves de Extremadura. Anuario ADENEX 1999–2000. Volumen 2. ADENEX. Mérida. Google Scholar

58.

M. Rodríguez 1985. Defensa de la agricultura extremeña a finales del siglo XVIII: quejas y protestas. Norba. Revista de Historia , 6: 185–190. Google Scholar

59.

F. J. Sánchez-Aguado 1986. Sobre la alimentación de los gorriones molinero y común (Passer montanus L. y P. domesticus L.) en invierno y primavera. Ardeola , 33: 17–33. Google Scholar

60.

J. M. Sánchez-Guzmán , Á. Sánchez-García , A. Fernández-García and A. Muñoz del Viejo (Eds.). 1993. La Grulla Común (Grus gras) en Extremadura. Status y Relación con el Uso del Suelo. Universidad de Extremadura. Badajoz. Google Scholar

61.

C. Sánchez Rubio (Ed.). 2010. Historia e Imagen de un Asedio. Badajoz 1705. Editorial 4 Gatos. Badajoz. Google Scholar

62.

F. Sánchez Salazar 1988. Extensión de Cultivos en España en el siglo XVIII. Siglo XXI de España Editores-MAPA. Madrid. Google Scholar

63.

J. C. Señar and A. Borras 2004. Sobrevivir al invierno: estrategias de las aves invernantes en la península Ibérica. Ardeola , 51: 133–168. Google Scholar

64.

J. C. Señar and J. L. Copete 1995. Mediterranean house sparrows (Passer domesticus) are not used to freezing temperatures: an analysis of survival rates. Journal of Applied Statistics , 22: 1069–1074. Google Scholar

65.

SEO/BirdLife. 2012. Atlas de las Aves en Invierno en España 2007–2010. Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente-SEO/BirdLife. Madrid. Google Scholar

66.

J. L. Tellería , B. Asensio and M. Díaz 1999. Aves Ibéricas. II. Paseriformes. J. M. Reyero Editor. Madrid. Google Scholar

67.

G. Torres 2005. Historia de Ubeda en sus Documentos. Tomo V. Asociación Cultural Ubetense Alfredo Cazabán Laguna. Ubeda. Google Scholar

68.

L. M. Torres-Vila , J. J. Ferrero-García , D. Martín-Vertedor and Á. Sánchez-González 2009. La sanidad vegetal en Extremadura en el siglo XIX. In, J. L. Mosquera Müller (Ed.): Dioses, Mitos y Demonios: la Agricultura Extremeña en el Siglo XIX. Colección: Historia Agraria y Rural , pp. 97–114. Consejería de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural, Junta de Extremadura. Badajoz. Google Scholar

69.

L. M. Torres-Vila and Á. Sánchez González 2007. Crisis agrarias en la Mérida del siglo XVIII: La gran plaga de langosta de 1754-1757. In, M. Ortiz Macias and J. A. Peñafiel González (Eds.): Juan Pablo Forner y la Ilustración , pp. 471–495. Ayuntamiento de Mérida. Mérida. Google Scholar

70.

J. Tracey , M. Bomford , Q. Hart , G. Saunders and R. Sinclair 2007. Managing Bird Damage to Fruit and Other Horticultural Crops. Bureau of Rural Sciences. Canberra. Google Scholar

71.

P. Van Heijnsbergen 1997. International Legal Protection of Wild Fauna and Flora. IOS Press. Ámsterdam. Google Scholar

72.

E. N. Wright , I. R. Inglis and C. J. Feare (Eds.). 1980. Bird Problems in Agriculture. BCPC Publications. Croydon. Google Scholar

73.

M. C. Zamora 2004. El tratamiento de las plagas en el campo de Cartagena. Revista Murciana de Antropología , 10: 129–133. Google Scholar
Luis M. Torres-Vila, Juan J. Ferrero-García, Daniel Martín-Vertedor, Francisco J. Moral-García, Pedro P. Bueno, Juan Morillo-Barragán, Álvaro Sánchez-González, and F. Javier Mendiola "Sparrow Plagues in Extremadura (Western Spain) Over Four Centuries (1501–1900): A Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Records From Historical Archives," Ardeola 62(1), 19-33, (1 June 2015). https://doi.org/10.13157/arla.62.1.2015.19
Received: 12 November 2014; Accepted: 1 January 2015; Published: 1 June 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE
15 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top