Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
20 July 2022 Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in burrowing bettongs (Bettongia lesueur): a comparison of cat-free and cat-exposed populations
Philippa A. McKay, Jasmin Hufschmid, Anna L. Meredith, Patsy A. Zendejas-Heredia, Katherine E. Moseby
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Toxoplasma gondii is a ubiquitous protozoan transmitted by felids and infection, morbidity, and mortality occur in numerous marsupial species. This study explores the relationship between cat exposure and Toxoplasma in burrowing bettongs (Bettongia lesueur) in the Arid Recovery Reserve (ARR), South Australia. We estimated seroprevalence, using a modified agglutination test for T. gondii-specific immunoglobulins, in cat-free and cat-exposed bettong populations. Tissue samples collected opportunistically from bettong carcasses and from cats within and around the reserve were screened for T. gondii DNA using multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (M-qPCR). Two cats trapped inside the ARR tested positive (50.0%; 95% CI: 15.0–85.0%). All bettongs tested from the cat-free (n = 48) and cat-exposed (n = 19) exclosures were seronegative (95% CI: 0–7.41% and 0–16.82% respectively). We found no evidence of fatal toxoplasmosis, with all bettong carcasses negative on M-qPCR (n = 11). We propose that T. gondii was not detected in bettongs coexisting with cats primarily due to low exposure of bettongs at the time of sampling, possibly due to poor oocyst viability in arid conditions or low shedding by cats. Ongoing screening throughout high and low rainfall years should be conducted to better establish the risk of Toxoplasma to bettongs in the ARR.

Introduction

Feral domestic cats (Felis catus) play a significant and ongoing role in the extinction crisis facing Australian native mammals (Woinarski et al. 2015). Since their introduction in 1788 (Abbott 2008), cats have thrived, with populations estimated at 2.1–6.3 million across over 99.8% of Australia (Legge et al. 2017). Predation is widely regarded to be the strongest direct negative effect of cats on endemic wildlife populations (Woinarski et al. 2015; Doherty et al. 2017). However, less is known about the negative and potentially exacerbating, indirect effects of this invasive species, such as disease transmission (Medina et al. 2014). Despite ongoing efforts, complete eradication of feral cats from the Australian mainland is considered highly unlikely in the foreseeable future (Doherty et al. 2017; Legge et al. 2017). Consequently, a more complete understanding of predator–prey interactions is crucial to both the management of feral cats and the successful conservation of threatened native species (Medina et al. 2014).

The zoonotic protozoan Toxoplasma gondii is receiving increasing interest for its potential role in population declines of native marsupials, with infection or exposure documented in numerous species (Hillman et al. 2016). Felids are the definitive host of this parasite, which has a worldwide distribution and can infect virtually all endothermic species (Robert-Gangneux and Dardé 2012). Several studies have found seroprevalence in free-ranging populations of marsupials to be positively associated with cat density (Parameswaran 2008; Hollings et al. 2013; Taggart et al. 2019).

Infection in felids is predominantly subclinical and usually follows predation of an intermediate host carrying tissue cysts (bradyzoites). Sexual reproduction of the parasite results in millions of oocysts being shed in faeces, where they sporulate to become infective to intermediate species following ingestion (Dubey 2010). Significant clinical disease has been confirmed in a range of Australian marsupials, although clinical outcome varies between species (Canfield et al. 1990; Innes 1997; Dubey 2010; Hillman et al. 2016). Outbreaks described in captive marsupials are often characterised by high rates of morbidity and mortality (Barrows 2006; Basso et al. 2007; Dubey and Crutchley 2008; Guthrie et al. 2017). Whether or not this extreme scenario extends to free-ranging populations is unclear (Hillman et al. 2016), with evidence of both overt disease (Obendorf and Munday 1983; Obendorf et al. 1996; Parameswaran et al. 2010; Groenewegen et al. 2017) and subclinical infection (Parameswaran et al. 2009; Pan et al. 2012; Fancourt et al. 2014; Reiss et al. 2015) reported.

Burrowing bettongs, Bettongia lesueur (Marsupialia: Potoroidae), are a medium-sized, bipedal, largely herbivorous marsupial living communally in burrows (Sander et al. 1997; Bice and Moseby 2008). The species has suffered drastic population declines following European settlement, with natural populations now limited to <0.01% of their former range (Short and Turner 1993). Successful reintroduced subpopulations are confined to feral predator-free islands and fenced mainland sanctuaries (Short and Turner 2000; Moseby et al. 2011; Richards 2012). Toxoplasmosis is included as a possible threat in the Australian Government’s National Recovery Plan for burrowing bettongs (Richards 2012). Prevalence studies have so far been limited to felid-free populations, in which there was no evidence of exposure (Parameswaran 2008).

We sought to explore the relationship between exposure to felids and infection with T. gondii in a reintroduced population of burrowing bettongs within the Arid Recovery Reserve (ARR), South Australia (SA). We anticipated that evidence of T. gondii would be higher in bettongs coexisting with cats within the reserve. Through this study, we aimed to improve understanding of the indirect impacts of feral cats and the possible risk of T. gondii transmission involved with exposing native marsupials to cats.

Materials and methods

A modified agglutination test (MAT) was used to determine the serostatus of burrowing bettongs belonging to two populations in the ARR: one protected from cats and another coexisting with cats. To avoid overlooking individuals that might have died from acute toxoplasmosis, bettong carcasses collected from within the reserve were tested for T. gondii DNA using a multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (M-qPCR). Tissue samples collected from cats culled as part of a local feral predator control program and incursions into the reserve were also screened for T. gondii DNA.

Study site

Our study was conducted in the ARR, an ecosystem restoration programme in SA (30°29′S, 136°53′E), approximately 20 km north of the Roxby Downs township. The 123 km2 reserve is surrounded by wire-mesh fencing effective at preventing entry of cats and foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Predator-proof fencing is used to section the area into several exclosures containing different native and non-native species (Moseby and Read 2006). Those relevant to this study include the Cat-Free Paddock (CFP), where bettongs reside without cats, and two Cat-Exposed Paddocks (CEP 1 and CEP 2), in which the two species coexist (Fig. 1). Mean annual rainfall is 138.0 mm, although rainfall is erratic (Bureau of Meteorology 2020b). Exclosures are within the same land system with minimal variation in climate between sites.

Fig. 1.

Schematic of the Arid Recovery Reserve in South Australia highlighting the exclosures from which bettongs and cats were tested in our study. The solid lines denote predator-proof fencing. CFP, Cat-Free Paddock; CEP 1, Cat-Exposed Paddock 1; CEP 2, Cat-Exposed Paddock 2. The locations of cats tested within the ARR are indicated by asterisks.

ZO22010_F1.gif

Bettongs (n = 30) were translocated to the CFP (14 km2) in 1999–2000 from two felid-free islands (Moseby et al. 2011). Regular active monitoring for predator incursions has since been performed (Moseby and Read 2006; Moseby et al. 2019). This acted as the source population for translocations to CEP 1 (26 km2) in 2014 (n = 352) (Moseby et al. 2019), where a population of feral cats (0.08–1.92 cats km−2) has been maintained as part of research into the potential for alien predators and threatened native prey species to coexist (Moseby et al. 2019). This is achieved through the addition of cats from the surrounding area, incursions, breeding, and culling (Moseby et al. 2019; K. Moseby, pers. obs.). At the time of this study, there were an estimated 71 bettongs in the CFP, and 43 bettongs and three cats (0.16 cats km−2) in CEP 1. In CEP 2 (37 km2), 10 feral cats were known to be present in 2008/2009 (0.27 cats km−2) (Schroeder et al. 2015) alongside bettongs, and camera traps and spoor counts suggest that cats have been present continuously since that time (K. Moseby, pers. obs.).

Sample collection

Bettongs were captured in treadle-operated Sheffield cage traps baited with rolled oats and peanut butter and set along road networks in the CFP (n = 83) and CEP 1 (n = 141) for four consecutive nights in May 2019. Individuals were observed in the trap before being transferred into a handling bag. They were assessed for clinical signs of toxoplasmosis, including obvious neurological (e.g. head tilt), respiratory (e.g. dyspnoea), and ocular abnormalities (e.g. blindness), and marked lethargy. Up to 0.5 mL of blood was collected from the lateral coccygeal vein using a 23-gauge 19 mm winged infusion set into a serum tube and stored on ice (Vogelnest and Portas 2008). Individuals were conscious and kept in the handling bag during venepuncture with their heads covered to minimise stress, with the procedure lasting less than 2 min per bettong. Observations and sampling were performed by the same two veterinarians.

Between November 2017 and April 2019, bettong carcasses found within CFP and CEP 2 were collected and stored at −20°C. We selected carcasses that were sufficiently intact for tissue sampling, rejecting extremely decomposed specimens to reduce the likelihood of false negative results associated with expected DNA degradation. Carcasses were thawed prior to necropsy and examined for gross pathology suggestive of toxoplasmosis, including pulmonary congestion, consolidation or oedema, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, patterning to the liver parenchyma and erythema or haemorrhages to abdominal or thoracic organs (Canfield et al. 1990; Bettiol et al. 2000) A total of 5 g of tissue was sampled from the tongue, skeletal muscle (biceps femoris and/or quadriceps), brain, heart, lung, and eyes depending on availability from each individual, and refrozen.

Tissue samples were obtained opportunistically from cats culled as part of a feral predator control programme within the ARR and in the surrounding area, including the Roxby Downs township. In August and September 2019, two cats were trapped within CEP 2 and a third as an incursion into an exclosure separate from the bettong populations included in this study (Fig. 1). A combination of liver, tongue, heart, and skeletal muscle (quadriceps) samples totalling 5 g were collected shortly after euthanasia and immersed in 70% ethanol. In addition, liver samples from six cats previously collected and stored in ethanol in 2018 were also tested as part of our study. One of these cats inhabited CEP 1 and the remainder had been caught outside of the reserve.

Modified agglutination test (MAT)

Within 6 h of sampling, whole blood samples were centrifuged, and serum was transferred to microcentrifuge tubes for storage at −20°C. Serological testing took place at the Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne. A commercially available MAT (Toxo-Screen DA, bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France) was used to analyse serum for the presence of T. gondii-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG), following a modified protocol used by the Animal Health Laboratories of the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (DPIPWE), Tasmania, Australia. Serial four-fold dilutions of the samples were obtained by mixing phosphate buffered saline with 25 μL of each serum sample, resulting in final dilutions of 1:16, 1:64 and 1:256. Positive and negative controls supplied with the kit were used at 1:16 dilution. Mercaptoethanol (0.2 mol L−1) was added to denature IgM and suppress non-specific agglutination in all sample wells. Formalin-treated Toxoplasma antigen was added, which agglutinates in the presence of T. gondii-specific IgG.

There is no established serological cut-off for this test in bettongs and so a positive reaction was concluded if a pink mat of agglutinated antigen covered more than half of the bottom of the sample well at a dilution of at least 1:64. This follows the protocol used by Mt. Pleasant Laboratories (a NATA accredited facility) and is consistent with published studies using this test in Australian marsupials (Obendorf et al. 1996; Miller et al. 2000; Hartley and English 2005; Hollings et al. 2013; Fancourt et al. 2014). Positive and borderline reactions were repeated on a second serum sample and diluted further to 1:1024 and 1:4096.

Sensitivity and specificity values have not been calculated for the MAT in bettongs. Extrapolating from available data, we estimate a specificity of 93% in line with that determined by Hillman et al. (2017) for other marsupial species. Sensitivity could not be calculated in this study, and therefore we estimate 96% based on evaluations in domestic cats (Adriaanse et al. 2020).

Multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (M-qPCR)

Tissue digestion and DNA extraction using the ISOLATE II Genomic DNA Kit (Bioline) were carried out on bettong and feline tissue samples as described by Adriaanse et al. (2020). From each individual, 5 g of pooled tissue sample was used for DNA extraction. DNA concentration was increased by performing the elution step twice (50 μL each) to a final elution volume of 100 μL. Genomic DNA were subjected to M-qPCR in duplicates on a MIC Personal qPCR Cycler (Bio Molecular Systems, Upper Coomera, Queensland, Australia) as described by Adriaanse et al. (2020). Genomic DNA from T. gondii tachyzoites (Walter and Elizabeth Hall Institute, Melbourne, Australia) was used as positive and non-template controls for each reaction. Probes and primers used are outlined in Table 1. A Ct threshold of <35 was needed to consider a sample positive. For analysis, results were converted to a binary variable (positive or negative).

Table 1.

Targets, primers, probes and concentrations used in a multiplex qPCR to screen burrowing bettongs (Bettongia lesueur) and feral cats (Felis catus) for infection with Toxoplasma gondii.

ZO22010_T1.gif

Data analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using the epidemiological calculator ‘Epitools’ (Sergeant 2018) and the ‘Winpepi’ software suit (Abramson 2011).

Ethical considerations

Approval was obtained from the SA Wildlife Ethics Committee (project 2/2019) and the Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Board, University of Edinburgh. Import (14749548) and wildlife research permits were obtained for Victoria (DELWP (No.10009104). Field work and export of samples were carried out under Arid Recovery’s research permit (U26497-6).

Results

Bettongs

Bettongs were trapped in 44.6% (37/83) of traps set in the CFP and 9.2% (13/141) in CEP 1. An estimated 67.6% of all bettongs in the CFP (48/71) and 44.2% of bettongs in CEP 1 (19/43) were tested using the MAT. There was no statistically significant difference between the proportion of males (CFP: n = 13; CEP 1: n = 9) and females (CFP: n = 35; CEP 1: n = 10) (Upton’s modified Chi-square test, χ2 = 2.502; 1 d.f.; P = 0.114) or the proportion of subadults (<18 months) (CFP: n = 1; CEP 1: n = 1) and adults (>18 months) (CFP: n = 47; CEP 1: n = 18) (two-tailed Fisher’s exact test; P = 0.490) when comparing the sample cohort from each exclosure (Campbell 2007).

The opportunity for assessment of bettongs in cage traps and in the hand was limited, but no obvious clinical signs associated with toxoplasmosis were observed. All serum samples were negative for T. gondii-specific IgG based on a cut-off dilution of 1:64. An apparent seroprevalence of 0% (n = 48; 95% CI: 0–7.41%) was calculated for the cat-free population (CFP) and 0% (n = 19; 95% CI: 0–16.82%) for the cat-exposed population (CEP 1) using a Wilson score interval (Brown et al. 2001).

Ten adult bettong carcasses from CEP 2 and one from the CFP were suitable for necropsy and sampling. No gross pathology associated with toxoplasmosis was observed and all tissue samples were negative for T. gondii DNA by M-qPCR.

Feral cats

Of the four cats caught within the ARR, two tested positive for T. gondii DNA by M-qPCR (50.0% of cats trapped at ARR; 95% CI: 15.0–85.0%): one in CEP 2 and one as an incursion in another exclosure. Both were trapped in September 2019 and a full set of tissue samples were collected. No cat incursions occurred in the CFP where bettongs were sampled. Two of the five liver samples collected from cats trapped outside the ARR in 2018 also tested positive (40.0% of cats trapped outside of ARR; 95% CI: 11.8–76.9%). Both resided within the Roxby Downs township.

Discussion

The objective of our study was to explore the relationship between exposure to feral cats and detection of T. gondii in burrowing bettongs in the ARR. To the authors’ knowledge, these findings represent the first seroprevalence study of T. gondii in a population of burrowing bettongs coexisting with cats. All bettongs tested from both cat-exposed and cat-free populations were negative for T. gondii infection or exposure using the MAT and M-qPCR. However, we did detect evidence of infection in the local feral cat population.

We detected T. gondii in the feline population both inside the ARR and in the Roxby Downs township (50.0% of cats trapped at ARR (95% CI: 15.0–85.0%) and 40.0% of cats trapped outside of ARR (95% CI: 11.8–76.9%)). Unfortunately, our small sample sizes hindered precise estimation of prevalence in these groups. Comparisons with other studies using PCR to determine prevalence in Australian feral cats are problematic due to both our limited dataset and the significant geographical variation observed. Dickson (2018) estimated 24.4% prevalence across the continent (n = 234) but identified just 6.3% in Roxby Downs (n = 16). Adriaanse et al. (2020) detected T. gondii DNA in 79.5% of cats on Phillip Island, Victoria (n = 161), whereas Adams (2003) recorded a prevalence of just 4.9% in Western Australia (WA) (n = 268). Despite this high variability and the challenges previously highlighted, our sampling confirms the presence of T. gondii in the definitive feline host at our study site. However, although cats have been present continuously in CEP 2, we cannot be sure of temporal overlap between the positive cat trapped in September 2019 and bettong carcasses collected between November 2017 and April 2019, and therefore cannot confirm that exposure occurred.

Prevalence in the feline population outside the ARR may have been underestimated as liver had been exclusively sampled from these cats. Bradyzoites have lower tropism for liver in felids, leading to the potential for false negatives (Dubey 1997). This could explain the lower seroprevalence detected in Roxy Downs by Dickson (2018), as, similarly, only liver was tested. In three of the cats captured inside the ARR, we were able to sample a range of tissues from optimal bradyzoite predilection sites, which were pooled for testing, thus increasing the likelihood of detection. It is therefore possible that the higher prevalence found in the ARR is a more accurate reflection of feline prevalence in this region, although again our relatively small sample size should be noted.

Several studies in Australia have shown an increased seroprevalence in free-ranging marsupial populations in areas with higher densities of cats (Parameswaran 2008; Hollings et al. 2013; Taggart et al. 2019; Taggart et al. 2021). Although cat numbers were relatively low at the time of sampling (0.16 cats km−2), most of the bettongs sampled in this exclosure (18/19) were known from previous trapping data to have been alive when density peaked at 1.92 cats km−2 in January 2018 (K. Moseby, unpubl. data). This is much higher than the mean density of feral cats inhabiting natural environments of Australia (mainland and islands), estimated at 0.27 cats km−2 (95% CI: 0.18–0.45 cats km−2) (Legge et al. 2017). However, we found no difference in seroprevalence between the cat-free and cat-exposed bettong populations, estimating 0% in both the CFP and CEP 1.

Our estimates are consistent with 0% seroprevalence of T. gondii reported by Parameswaran (2008) in two populations of burrowing bettongs, although notably these were from Faure Island (0/28) and Barrow Island (0/14), both felid-free islands in WA. Although seropositive brush-tailed bettongs have been identified in two populations in WA (5.8% n = 153; 1.4% n = 73) (Parameswaran 2008), surveys of other bettong species in Tasmania (Portas et al. 2014) and various locations in WA (Parameswaran 2008; Skogvold et al. 2017) have failed to detect evidence of T. gondii infection. Given these reports of very low seroprevalence in bettongs, it is possible that our sample sizes in the CFP and CEP 1 were not large enough to detect a positive individual, despite the high percentage of both bettong populations included in the survey (67.6% and 44.2% respectively).

In CEP 1, bettongs were captured in only 9.2% of set traps, all of which geographically clustered within one half of the exclosure. This might indicate a distribution preference by bettongs to avoid habitat occupied by cats, which could also have affected their exposure to oocysts. However, monitoring of feline movements in the exclosure has detected cats on every kilometre of track transects and on over 50% of camera traps (Moseby et al. 2019), making this scenario unlikely.

The level of environmental contamination with oocysts is dependent not only on feline abundance and prevalence, but also oocyst shedding. Although the detection of T. gondii DNA confirms the presence of infection, it does not indicate whether that individual is shedding. A single cat can excrete millions of oocysts (Dubey 2001); however, shedding typically occurs for only 1–2 weeks following initial infection and is affected by numerous host and parasite factors (Dubey et al. 1977; Dubey 1995). Consequently, it is estimated that, at any given time, less than 1% of cats are expected to be excreting oocysts (Dubey and Jones 2008). Therefore, there is only a very small probability of there being a cat shedding in the ARR at the time of sampling and so the risk of bettong exposure to T. gondii is low.

A key factor in the transmission of T. gondii from cats to intermediate hosts is sporulation and survival of oocysts in the environment. Although sporulated oocysts are environmentally robust, prolonged viability occurs in cool, moist soil or water (Yilmaz and Hopkins 1972; Frenkel et al. 1975). Oocyst survival is proposed to account for patterns in T. gondii infection worldwide, with higher prevalence observed in tropical or temperate regions (Meerburg and Kijlstra 2009; Montazeri et al. 2020). Numerous studies correlate seropositivity in intermediate and definitive hosts with rainfall (Almería et al. 2004; Gamarra et al. 2008; Afonso et al. 2013). In Australia, lower seroprevalence is recorded in cats inhabiting semiarid compared to temperate parts of Victoria (Coman et al. 1981) and Tasmania’s cooler, wetter climate is proposed to explain a generally higher detection of T. gondii in resident marsupial species and cats (Fancourt et al. 2014; Reiss et al. 2015). This is supported by climate and microclimate models demonstrating low annual rainfall and high air and soil temperatures to be the most significant factors restricting distribution of this parasite in Australian cats (Dickson 2018).

Laboratory experiments confirm a significant reduction in survival and infectivity of oocysts at high temperatures (Dubey 1998). Non-sporulated oocysts are particularly fragile, with exposure to 37°C proving lethal after 24 h (Dubey et al. 1970). Summer temperatures in the ARR regularly exceed this and therefore oocysts may only be present and infective during cooler winter months (Bureau of Meteorology 2020a). Oocysts are also susceptible to desiccation in low humidity. Lélu et al. (2012) found only 7.4% of oocysts surviving after 100 days in dry soil, corresponding to 281 mm of rain per year. Average yearly rainfall for the Roxby Downs area is just 138.0 mm and the region has recently suffered several years of drought, recording the lowest annual rainfall in nearly two decades in 2019 (Bureau of Meteorology 2020b). Such conditions are likely to have further diminished the number and infectivity of oocysts present in the environment, reducing the likelihood of transmission from cats to bettongs at the time of our study.

As well as modulating oocyst survival within the environment, climatic variations can influence transmission by acting on host population composition and interactions (Afonso et al. 2013). For example, expansion of both small mammal and feline populations occurs following increased rainfall (Stenseth et al. 2002; Legge et al. 2017). Such conditions can amplify the parasite in both populations through increased predator–prey interactions (Lélu et al. 2010), vertical transmission (Marshall et al. 2004) and increased environmental burden as young cats are infected and shedding for the first time (Dubey et al. 1977; Dabritz et al. 2007). This scenario was proposed to have occurred in the Gibson Desert Nature Reserve, WA, where prevalence in cats increased from 0% in 2000 to 66.7% in 2001 following an unusually high winter rainfall (Adams 2003). Studies have detected a seasonality in the risk of infection in cats (Adriaanse et al. 2020), the proportion of cats in a population shedding (Herrmann et al. 2010; Schares et al. 2016), and the detection of oocysts in soil (Wit et al. 2020). In Roxby Downs, seasonal fluctuations in feral cat density have been recorded and linked to peaks and troughs in rabbit numbers in the area (Read and Bowen 2001). Therefore, repeat sampling during cooler, wetter periods in the ARR might reveal different results in both the feline and bettong populations.

Seroprevalence estimates in bettongs were based on results of a MAT, which exclusively agglutinates IgG. IgG is generally not detectable in sera until 1–3 weeks after initial infection (Johnson et al. 1989; Bettiol et al. 2000; Robert-Gangneux and Dardé 2012). Therefore, sensitivity during the acute phase of infection is very low (Johnson et al. 1989; Lynch et al. 1993; Bettiol et al. 2000). If T. gondii was present in the bettong population and causing acute toxoplasmosis with high rates of mortality, infected individuals may have died before detectable levels of IgG were present in their sera, leading to a falsely low seroprevalence. To address this limitation, we screened opportunistically collected deceased bettongs using M-qPCR. We did not detect T. gondii DNA in any of the individuals sampled (n = 11), including 10 that had coexisted with cats. Several studies have used PCR to detect T. gondii in marsupials (Parameswaran et al. 2010; Pan et al. 2012; Hillman et al. 2017). To minimise false negatives, we included relatively large quantities (5 g) of pooled tissue samples from several sites commonly infiltrated by bradyzoites (Dubey 1997). We also selected carcasses that were not significantly decomposed and performed necropsies straight after defrosting to minimise DNA degradation. Therefore, it is highly likely that these bettongs were free from infection at the time of death. However, given the small sample size and the expectation that a proportion of dead bettongs are not detected, the possibility that bettongs are not succumbing to fatal acute disease cannot be excluded.

It is also possible that seropositive bettongs were not detected in our seroprevalence survey because they are more frequently preyed upon by cats. Latent toxoplasmosis in intermediate hosts has been correlated with adaptive manipulation, the parasite-induced alteration of host behaviour to specifically benefit the parasite (Poulin 2010). In latently infected rats and mice, this can manifest as both a loss of aversion to cat odours and a simultaneous attraction to them (Berdoy et al. 2000; Vyas et al. 2007). Although further research is needed, there is a growing body of literature suggesting that a similar scenario may occur in other species in the wild (Kreuder et al. 2003; Poirotte et al. 2016).

Conclusions and recommendations

The detection of T. gondii in cats in the region of the ARR is concerning and highlights a potential disease threat to valuable reintroduced populations of native species. We propose that the apparent absence of T. gondii exposure in bettongs coexisting with cats may have arisen due to a low risk of bettong exposure to this parasite at the time of sampling. This may be due to poor oocyst viability in arid conditions exacerbated by recent drought, and the low probability of oocyst shedding by cats inhabiting the exclosure. Screening of soil samples for the quantity and infectivity of oocysts using qPCR would be beneficial to further explore this theory (Lélu et al. 2012). Although we found no evidence of bettongs dying from acute toxoplasmosis, this scenario cannot be excluded, and we recommend further screening of carcasses for T. gondii DNA. Crucially, we recommend that ongoing testing be performed through a range of seasonal conditions and during drought and high rainfall years. Ideally, this would be extended to include other susceptible species inhabiting the reserve. These efforts would account for the effects of climate on the epidemiology of T. gondii and establish the risk of transmission of this important parasite to reintroduced populations of vulnerable native species.

Data availability

The data that support this study will be shared upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Declaration of funding

Funding support was provided by a Wildlife Disease Association Australasia Research Award Stipend and the Conservation and Wildlife Research Trust.

Acknowledgements.

Arid Recovery is a conservation and research organisation supported by BHP Billiton, The University of Adelaide, The SA Department for Environment and Water and Bush Heritage Australia. We thank K. Tuft, H. McGregor, G. Neave and H. Bannister for logistical assistance and providing access, and the ARC Prey Naivety Linkage Project for allowing us to use their experimental treatments. We are also grateful to N. Hughes for organising the collection of feline tissue samples. Special thanks go to C. Phillips for her skills and assistance in collecting blood samples from bettongs. We also thank R. Traub at the Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, for her expertise. Support provided by staff and colleagues at the Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, the University of Edinburgh, is gratefully acknowledged.

References

1.

Abbott I (2008) The spread of the cat, Felis catus, in Australia: re-examination of the current conceptual model with additional information. Conservation Science Western Australia Journal 7(1), 1–17. Google Scholar

2.

Abramson JH (2011) WINPEPI updated: computer programs for epidemiologists, and their teaching potential. Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations 8, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5573-8-1 Google Scholar

3.

Adams PJ (2003) Parasites of feral cats and native fauna from Western Australia: the application of molecular techniques for the study of parasitic infections in Australian wildlife. PhD thesis, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia. Google Scholar

4.

Adriaanse K, Firestone SM, Lynch M, Rendall AR, Sutherland DR, Hufschmid J, Traub R (2020) Comparison of the modified agglutination test and real time PCR for detection of Toxoplasma gondii exposure in feral cats from Phillip Island, Australia, and risk factors associated with infection. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 12, 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2020.05.006 Google Scholar

5.

Afonso E, Germain E, Poulle M-L, Ruette S, Devillard S, Say L, Villena I, Aubert D, Gilot-Fromont E (2013) Environmental determinants of spatial and temporal variations in the transmission of Toxoplasma gondii in its definitive hosts. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 2, 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2013.09.006 Google Scholar

6.

Almería S, Calvete C, Pagés A, Gauss C, Dubey JP (2004) Factors affecting the seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) from Spain. Veterinary Parasitology 123, 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.06.010 Google Scholar

7.

Barrows M (2006) Toxoplasmosis in a colony of sugar gliders (Petaurus breviceps). Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice 9, 617–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2006.05.006 Google Scholar

8.

Basso W, Venturini MC, Moré G, Quiroga A, Bacigalupe D, Unzaga JM, Larsen A, Laplace R, Venturini L (2007) Toxoplasmosis in captive Bennett's wallabies (Macropus rufogriseus) in Argentina. Veterinary Parasitology 144(1–2), 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.09.030 Google Scholar

9.

Berdoy M, Webster JP, Macdonald DW (2000) Fatal attraction in rats infected with Toxoplasma gondii. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 267(1452), 1591–1594. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1182 Google Scholar

10.

Bettiol SS, Obendorf DL, Nowarkowski M, Goldsmid JM (2000) Pathology of experimental toxoplasmosis in eastern barred bandicoots in Tasmania. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 36(1), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-36.1.141 Google Scholar

11.

Bice J, Moseby K (2008) Diets of the re-introduced greater bilby (Macrotis lagotis) and burrowing bettong (Bettongia lesueur) in the Arid Recovery Reserve, northern South Australia. Australian Mammalogy 30, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1071/am08001 Google Scholar

12.

Brown LD, Cai TT, DasGupta A (2001) Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Statistical Science 16, 101–133. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1009213286 Google Scholar

13.

Bureau of Meteorology (2020a) Monthly mean maximum temperature. Roxby Downs (Olympic Dam Aerodrome). Available at  www.bom.gov.au/jsp/ncc/cdio/weatherData/av?p_nccObsCode=36&p_display_ type=dataFile&p_startYear=&p_c=&p_stn_num=016096 [Accessed May 2021] Google Scholar

14.

Bureau of Meteorology (2020b) Monthly rainfall. Roxby Downs (Olympic Dam Aerodrome). Available at  www.bom.gov.au/jsp/ncc/cdio/weatherData/av?p_nccObsCode=139&p_display_type=dataFile&p_ startYear=&p_c=&p_stn_num=016096 [Accessed May 2021] Google Scholar

15.

Campbell I (2007) Chi-squared and Fisher–Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations. Statistics in Medicine 26, 3661–3675. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2832 Google Scholar

16.

Canfield PJ, Hartley WJ, Dubey JP (1990) Lesions of toxoplasmosis in Australian marsupials. Journal of Comparative Pathology 103(2), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9975(08)80172-7 Google Scholar

17.

Coman BJ, Jones EH, Westbury HA (1981) Protozoan and viral infections of feral cats. Australian Veterinary Journal 57(7), 319–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1981.tb05836.x Google Scholar

18.

Dabritz HA, Miller MA, Atwill ER, Gardner IA, Leutenegger CM, Melli AC, Conrad PA (2007) Detection of Toxoplasma gondii-like oocysts in cat faeces and estimates of the environmental oocyst burden. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 231(11), 1676–1684. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.231.11.1676 Google Scholar

19.

Dickson JAD (2018) The distribution of Toxoplasma gondii in Australia. B.Sc.(Honours) thesis, BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. Google Scholar

20.

Doherty TS, Dickman CR, Johnson CN, Legge SM, Ritchie EG, Woinarski JCZ (2017) Impacts and management of feral cats (Felis catus) in Australia. Mammal Review 47, 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12080 Google Scholar

21.

Dubey JP (1995) Duration of immunity to shedding of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts by cats. The Journal of Parasitology 81, 410–415. https://doi.org/10.2307/3283823 Google Scholar

22.

Dubey JP (1997) Tissue cyst tropism in Toxoplasma gondii: a comparison of tissue cyst formation in organs of cats and rodents fed oocysts. Parasitology 115, 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182097008949 Google Scholar

23.

Dubey JP (1998) Toxoplasma gondii oocyst survival under defined temperatures. Journal of Parasitology 84(4), 862–865. https://doi.org/10.2307/3284606 Google Scholar

24.

Dubey JP (2001) Oocyst shedding by cats fed isolated bradyzoites and comparison of infectivity of bradyzoites of the VEG strain Toxoplasma gondii to cats and mice. Journal of Parasitology 87, 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1645/0022-3395(2001)087[0215:osbcfi]2.0.co;2 Google Scholar

25.

Dubey JP (2010) ‘Toxoplasmosis of Animals and Humans.’ 2nd edn. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA) Google Scholar

26.

Dubey JP, Crutchley C (2008) Toxoplasmosis in wallabies (Macropus rufogriseus and Macropus eugenii): blindness, treatment with atovaquone, and isolation of Toxoplasma gondii. Journal of Parasitology 94, 929–933. https://doi.org/10.1645/ge-1448.1 Google Scholar

27.

Dubey JP, Jones JL (2008) Toxoplasma gondii infection in humans and animals in the United States. International Journal for Parasitology 38(11), 1257–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.03.007 Google Scholar

28.

Dubey JP, Miller NL, Frenkel JK (1970) The Toxoplasma gondii oocyst from cat feces. Journal of Experimental Medicine 132(4), 636–662. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.132.4.636 Google Scholar

29.

Dubey JP, Hoover EA, Walls KW (1977) Effect of age and sex on the acquisition of immunity to toxoplasmosis in cats. The Journal of Protozoology 24, 184–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.1977.tb05302.x Google Scholar

30.

Fancourt BA, Nicol SC, Hawkins CE, Jones ME, Johnson CN (2014) Beyond the disease: is Toxoplasma gondii infection causing population declines in the eastern quoll (Dasyurus viverrinus)? International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 3, 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2014.05.001 Google Scholar

31.

Frenkel JK, Ruiz A, Chinchilla M (1975) Soil survival of Toxoplasma oocysts in Kansas and Costa Rica. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 24(3), 439–443. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1975.24.439 Google Scholar

32.

Gamarra JA, Cabezón O, Pabón M, Arnal MC, Luco DF, Dubey JP, Gortázar C, Almería S (2008) Prevalence of antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii in roe deer from Spain. Veterinary Parasitology 153(1–2), 152–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.01.028 Google Scholar

33.

Groenewegen R, Harley D, Hill R, Coulson G (2017) Assisted colonisation trial of the eastern barred bandicoot (Perameles gunnii) to a fox-free island. Wildlife Research 44, 484–496. https://doi.org/10.1071/wr16198 Google Scholar

34.

Guthrie A, Rooker L, Tan R, Gerhold R, Trainor K, Jiang T, Su C (2017) Newly described Toxoplasma gondii strain causes high mortality in red necked wallabies (Macropus rufogriseus) in a zoo. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 48(3), 694–702. https://doi.org/10.1638/2016-0136.1 Google Scholar

35.

Hartley M, English A (2005) A seroprevalence survey of Toxoplasma gondii in common wombats (Vombatus ursinus). European Journal of Wildlife Research 51(1), 65–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-005-0077-0 Google Scholar

36.

Herrmann DC, Pantchev N, Vrhovec MG, Barutzki D, Wilking H, Fröhlich A, Lüder CGK, Conraths FJ, Schares G (2010) Atypical Toxoplasma gondii genotypes identified in oocysts shed by cats in Germany. International Journal for Parasitology 40, 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.08.001 Google Scholar

37.

Hillman AE, Lymbery AJ, Thompson RCA (2016) Is Toxoplasma gondii a threat to the conservation of free-ranging Australian marsupial populations? International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 5, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2015.12.002 Google Scholar

38.

Hillman AE, Ash AL, Kristancic AR, Elliot AD, Lymbery AJ, Robertson ID, Thompson RCA (2017) Validation of various parasite detection tests for use in the Australian marsupials quenda (Isoodon obesulus) and brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula). Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 29(1), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638716674509 Google Scholar

39.

Hollings T, Jones M, Mooney N, McCallum H (2013) Wildlife disease ecology in changing landscapes: mesopredator release and toxoplasmosis. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 2, 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2013.02.002 Google Scholar

40.

Innes EA (1997) Toxoplasmosis: comparative species susceptibility and host immune response. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 20(2), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0147-9571(96)00038-0 Google Scholar

41.

Johnson AM, Roberts H, Statham P, Munday BL (1989) Serodiagnosis of acute toxoplasmosis in macropods. Veterinary Parasitology 34(1–2), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4017(89)90160-x Google Scholar

42.

Kreuder C, Miller MA, Jessup DA, Lowenstine LJ, Harris MD, Ames JA, Carpenter TE, Conrad PA, Mazet JK (2003) Patterns of mortality in southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis) from 1998–2001. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 39, 495–509. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-39.3.495 Google Scholar

43.

Legge S, Murphy BP, McGregor H, Woinarski JCZ, Augusteyn J, Ballard G, Baseler M, Buckmaster T, Dickman CR, Doherty T, Edwards G, Eyre T, Fancourt BA, Ferguson D, Forsyth DM, Geary WL, Gentle M, Gillespie G, Greenwood L, Hohnen R, Hume S, Johnson CN, Maxwell M, McDonald PJ, Morris K, Moseby K, Newsome T, Nimmo D, Paltridge R, Ramsey D, Read J, Rendall A, Rich M, Ritchie E, Rowland J, Short J, Stokeld D, Sutherland DR, Wayne AF, Woodford L, Zewe F (2017) Enumerating a continental-scale threat: how many feral cats are in Australia? Biological Conservation 206, 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.11.032 Google Scholar

44.

Lélu M, Langlais M, Poulle M-L, Gilot-Fromont E (2010) Transmission dynamics of Toxoplasma gondii along an urban–rural gradient. Theoretical Population Biology 78(2), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2010.05.005 Google Scholar

45.

Lélu M, Villena I, Dardé M-L, Aubert D, Geers R, Dupuis E, Marnef F, Poulle M-L, Gotteland C, Dumètre A, Gilot-Fromont E (2012) Quantitative estimation of the viability of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts in soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 78(15), 5127–5132. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00246-12 Google Scholar

46.

Llewellyn S, Inpankaew T, Vaz Nery S, Gray DJ, Verweij JJ, Clements ACA, Gomes SJ, Traub R, McCarthy JS (2016) Application of a multiplex quantitative PCR to assess prevalence and intensity of intestinal parasite infections in a controlled clinical trial. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 10(1), e0004380. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004380 Google Scholar

47.

Lynch MJ, Obendorf DL, Reddacliff GL (1993) Serological responses of tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) to inoculation with an attenuated strain of Toxoplasma gondii. In‘Proceedings of the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians Annual Conference’, 10–15 October 1993, St Louis, MO, USA. Google Scholar

48.

Marshall PA, Hughes JM, Williams RH, Smith JE, Murphy RG, Hide G (2004) Detection of high levels of congenital transmissions of Toxoplasma gondii in natural urban populations of Mus domesticus. Parasitology 128(1), 39–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182003004189 Google Scholar

49.

Medina FM, Bonnaud E, Vidal E, Nogales M (2014) Underlying impacts of invasive cats on islands: not only a question of predation. Biodiversity and Conservation 23, 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0603-4 Google Scholar

50.

Meerburg BG, Kijlstra A (2009) Changing climate – changing pathogens: Toxoplasma gondii in north-western Europe. Parasitology Research 105(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-009-1447-4 Google Scholar

51.

Miller DS, Mitchell GF, Biggs B, McCracken H, Myroniuk P, Hewish M (2000) Agglutinating antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in sera from captive eastern barred bandicoots in Australia. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 36(2), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-36.2.213 Google Scholar

52.

Montazeri M, Mikaeili Galeh T, Moosazedeh M, Sarvi S, Dodangeh S, Javidnia J, Sharif M, Daryani A (2020) The global serological prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in felids during the last five decades (1967–2017): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasites & Vectors 13(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-3954-1 Google Scholar

53.

Moseby KE, Read JL (2006) The efficacy of feral cat, fox and rabbit exclusion fence designs for threatened species protection. Biological Conservation 127, 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.002 Google Scholar

54.

Moseby KE, Read JL, Paton DC, Copley P, Hill BM, Crisp HA (2011) Predation determines the outcome of 10 reintroduction attempts in arid South Australia. Biological Conservation 144(12), 2863–2872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.08.003 Google Scholar

55.

Moseby KE, Letnic M, Blumstein DT, West R (2019) Understanding predator densities for successful co-existence of alien predators and threatened prey. Austral Ecology 44(3), 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12697 Google Scholar

56.

Obendorf DL, Munday BL (1983) Toxoplasmosis in wild Tasmanian wallabies. Australian Veterinary Journal 60, 62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1983.tb05867.x Google Scholar

57.

Obendorf DL, Statham P, Driessen M (1996) Detection of agglutinating antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in sera from free-ranging eastern barred bandicoots (Perameles gunnii). Journal of Wildlife Diseases 32(4), 623–626. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-32.4.623 Google Scholar

58.

Pan S, Thompson RCA, Grigg ME, Sundar N, Smith A, Lymbery AJ (2012) Western Australian marsupials are multiply infected with genetically diverse strains of Toxoplasma gondii. PLoS ONE 7(9), e45147. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045147 Google Scholar

59.

Parameswaran N (2008) Toxoplasma gondii in Australian marsupials. PhD thesis, Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia. Google Scholar

60.

Parameswaran N, O'Handley RM, Grigg ME, Wayne A, Thompson RCA (2009) Vertical transmission of Toxoplasma gondii in Australian marsupials. Parasitology 136, 939–944. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182009006453 Google Scholar

61.

Parameswaran N, Thompson RCA, Sundar N, Pan S, Johnson M, Smith NC, Grigg ME (2010) Non-archetypal Type II-like and atypical strains of Toxoplasma gondii infecting marsupials of Australia. International Journal for Parasitology 40, 635–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.02.008 Google Scholar

62.

Poirotte C, Kappeler PM, Ngoubangoye B, Bourgeois S, Moussodji M, Charpentier MJE (2016) Morbid attraction to leopard urine in Toxoplasma-infected chimpanzees. Current Biology 26(3), R98–R99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.020c Google Scholar

63.

Portas T, Fletcher D, Spratt D, Reiss A, Holz P, Stalder K, Devlin J, Taylor D, Dobroszczyk D, Manning AD (2014) Health evaluation of free-ranging eastern bettongs (Bettongia gaimardi) during translocation for reintroduction in Australia. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 50(2), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.7589/2013-08-202 Google Scholar

64.

Poulin R (2010) Parasite manipulation of host behaviour: an update and frequently asked questions. In‘Advances in the Study of Behaviour’. (Ed. HJ Brockmann) pp. 151–186. (Academic Press: Waltham, MA, USA) Google Scholar

65.

Read J, Bowen Z (2001) Population dynamics, diet and aspects of the biology of feral cats and foxes in arid South Australia. Wildlife Research 28, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1071/wr99065 Google Scholar

66.

Reiss A, Jackson B, Gillespie G, Stokeld D, Warren K (2015) ‘Investigation of Potential Diseases Associated with Northern Territory Mammal Declines.’ (Charles Darwin University: Darwin, NT, Australia) Google Scholar

67.

Richards J (2012) Western barred bandicoot (Perameles bougainville), burrowing bettong (Bettongia lesueur) and banded hare-wallaby (Lagostrophus fasciatus) recovery plan 2007–2011. Wildlife Management Program No. 49. Department of Environment and Conservation, Perth, WA, Australia) Google Scholar

68.

Robert-Gangneux F, Dardé M-L (2012) Epidemiology of and diagnostic strategies for Toxoplasmosis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 25(2), 264–296. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.05013-11 Google Scholar

69.

Sander U, Short J, Turner B (1997) Social organisation and warren use of the burrowing bettong, Bettongia lesueur (Macropodoidea: Potoroidae). Wildlife Research 24, 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1071/wr96021 Google Scholar

70.

Schares G, Ziller M, Herrmann DC, Globokar MV, Pantchev N, Conraths FJ (2016) Seasonality in the proportions of domestic cats shedding Toxoplasma gondii or Hammondia hammondi oocysts is associated with climatic factors. International Journal for Parasitology 46(4), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2015.12.006 Google Scholar

71.

Schroeder T, Lewis MM, Kilpatrick AD, Moseby KE (2015) Dingo interactions with exotic mesopredators: spatiotemporal dynamics in an Australian arid-zone study. Wildlife Research 42(6), 529–239. https://doi.org/10.1071/wr15104 Google Scholar

72.

Sergeant ESG (2018) Epitools epidemiological calculators, Ausvet. Available at  https://epitools.ausvet.com.au/ [Accessed June 2022] Google Scholar

73.

Short J, Turner B (1993) The distribution and abundance of the burrowing bettong (Marsupialia: Macropoidea). Wildlife Research 20, 525–534. https://doi.org/10.1071/wr9930525 Google Scholar

74.

Short J, Turner B (2000) Reintroduction of the burrowing bettong, Bettongia lesueur (Marsupialia: Potoroidae) to mainland Australia. Biological Conservation 96, 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3207(00)00067-7 Google Scholar

75.

Skogvold K, Warren KS, Jackson B, Holyoake CS, Stalder K, Devlin JM, Vitali SD, Wayne A F, Legione A, Robertson I, Vaughan-Higgins RJ (2017) Infectious disease surveillance in the woylie (Bettongia penicillata). EcoHealth 14, 518–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-017-1254-9 Google Scholar

76.

Stenseth NC, Vlljugrein H, Jędrzejewski W, Mysterud A, Pucek Z (2002) Population dynamics of Clethrionomys glareolus and Apodemus flavicollis; seasonal components of density dependence and density independence. Acta Theriologica 47, 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03192479 Google Scholar

77.

Taggart PL, Fancourt BA, Peacock D, Caraguel CGB, McAllister MM (2019) Variation in Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence: effects of site, sex, species and behaviour between insular and mainland macropods. Wildlife Research 47, 540–546. https://doi.org/10.1071/wr19041 Google Scholar

78.

Taggart PL, Fancourt BA, Boardman, WSJ, Peacock DE, Caraguel CGB (2021) Infection pressure is necessary, but not sufficient by itself, to explain Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence in intermediate host species. Journal of Parasitology 107(4), 554–561. https://doi.org/10.1645/21-28 Google Scholar

79.

Vogelnest L, Portas T (2008) Macropods. In‘Medicine of Australian Mammals’. (Eds L Vogelnest, R Woods) p. 155. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia) Google Scholar

80.

Vyas A, Kim S-K, Giacomini N, Boothroyd JC, Sapolsky RM (2007) Behavioural changes induced by Toxoplasma infection of rodents are highly specific to aversion of cat odors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104(15), 6442–6447. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608310104 Google Scholar

81.

Wit LA, Kilpatrick AM, VanWormer E, Croll DA, Tershy BR, Kim M, Shapiro K (2020) Seasonal and spatial variation in Toxoplasma gondii contamination in soil in urban public spaces in California, United States. Zoonoses and Public Health 67(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12656 Google Scholar

82.

Woinarski JCZ, Burbidge AA, Harrison PL (2015) Ongoing unravelling of a continental fauna: decline and extinction of Australian mammals since European settlement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112(15), 4531–4540. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1417301112 Google Scholar

83.

Yilmaz SM, Hopkins SH (1972) Effects of different conditions on duration of infectivity of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts. Journal of Parasitology 58, 938–939. https://doi.org/10.2307/3286589 Google Scholar
© 2021 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing.
Philippa A. McKay, Jasmin Hufschmid, Anna L. Meredith, Patsy A. Zendejas-Heredia, and Katherine E. Moseby "Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in burrowing bettongs (Bettongia lesueur): a comparison of cat-free and cat-exposed populations," Australian Journal of Zoology 69(5), 175-183, (20 July 2022). https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO22010
Received: 12 March 2022; Accepted: 31 May 2022; Published: 20 July 2022
KEYWORDS
arid zone
Australian native marsupials
feral cats
modified agglutination test
multiplex real-time PCR
parasite
reintroduction
Back to Top