The caudal cranium of the South American sabertooth Thylacosmilus atrox (Thylacosmilidae, Sparassodonta, Metatheria) is described in detail, with emphasis on the constitution of the walls of the middle ear, cranial vasculature, and major nerve pathways. With the aid of micro-CT scanning of the holotype and paratype, we have established that five cranial elements (squamosal, alisphenoid, exoccipital, petrosal, and ectotympanic) and their various outgrowths participate in the tympanic floor and roof of this species. Thylacosmilus possessed a U-shaped ectotympanic that was evidently situated on the medial margin of the external acoustic meatus. The bulla itself is exclusively composed of the tympanic process of the exoccipital and rostral and caudal tympanic processes of the squamosal. Contrary to previous reports, neither the alisphenoid nor the petrosal participate in the actual tympanic floor, although they do contribute to the roof. In these regards Thylacosmilus is distinctly different from other borhyaenoids, in which the tympanic floor was largely membranous (e.g., Borhyaena) and lacked an enlarged ectotympanic (e.g., Paraborhyaena). In some respects Thylacosmilus is more similar to hathliacynids than to borhyaenoids, in that the former also possessed large caudal outgrowths of the squamosal and exoccipital that were clearly tympanic processes rather than simply attachment sites for muscles. However, hathliacynids also exhibited a large alisphenoid tympanic process, a floor component that is absent in Thylacosmilus. Habitual head posture was inferred on the basis of inner ear features. Large paratympanic spaces invade all of the elements participating in bounding the middle ear, another distinctive difference of Thylacosmilus compared to other sparassodonts. Arterial and venous vascular organization is relatively conservative in this species, although some vascular trackways could not have been securely identified without the availability of CT scanning. The anatomical correlates of the internal carotid in relation to other basicranial structures, the absence of a functional arteria diploetica magna, and the network for venous return from the endocranium agree with conditions in other sparassodonts.
INTRODUCTION
Sparassodonta is a wholly extinct radiation of predaceous metatherians thought to be endemic to South America. Fossils of metatherians with hypercarnivorous dentitions have been found on other continents, but in general they are too fragmentary to provide any certainty regarding their likely affinities (Beck, 2015), or are controversial for other reasons (Carneiro, 2018; see discussions in Muizon et al., 2018). Sparassodonta is generally regarded as a monophyletic clade of stem marsupials (e.g., Szalay, 1982; Marshall and Kielan-Jaworowska, 1992; Rougier et al., 1998; Babot, 2005; Forasiepi, 2009; Engelman and Croft, 2014; Forasiepi et al., 2015; Suárez et al., 2016; Muizon et al., 2018). Nearly 60 different species of sparassodonts have been recognized, the majority of Neogene age (fig. 1). Patene, a taxon represented in Eocene deposits in Argentina, Brazil and Peru, has been traditionally considered to have the most primitive morphology found in the group (e.g., Simpson, 1948; Marshall, 1981; Goin et al., 1986; Goin and Candela, 2004). Expressing this point in the form of a definition by ancestry, Sparassodonta is the group that includes the common ancestor of Patene and all its descendents (e.g., see Forasiepi, 2009; Engelman and Croft, 2014; Forasiepi et al., 2015; Suárez et al., 2016; Muizon et al., 2018).
Although there is broad agreement regarding the overall taxonomic composition of Sparassodonta, there are also persistent areas of controversy. The earliest taxa for which sparassodont affinities have been claimed include the Early Paleocene Tiupampan species Mayulestes ferox and Allqokirus australis (e.g., Muizon, 1994, 1998; Muizon et al., 1997, 2018). In a recent phylogenetic analysis presented by Muizon et al. (2018), Mayulestes, Allqokirus, and Patene are shown as forming a monophyletic group at the base of Sparassodonta. However, at least in the case of Mayulestes, alternative phylogenetic positions also have been proposed (Rougier et al., 1998; Goin, 2003; Babot, 2005; Forasiepi, 2009; Engelman and Croft, 2014; Forasiepi et al., 2015; Suárez et al., 2016; Wilson et al., 2016).
Undisputed records of Sparassodonta, including ones for Patene simpsoni, begin in the Early Eocene (Itaboraian) and extend through to the Pliocene (Chapadmalalan), when the last of them disappeared (Babot and Forasiepi, 2016; Prevosti and Forasiepi, 2018) (fig. 1). Forasiepi (2009) divided non-Tiupampan taxa into two principal groups, Hathliacynidae and Borhyaenoidea, the latter comprising Borhyaenidae, Thylacosmilidae, and (possibly) Proborhyaenidae (see Babot, 2005; Forasiepi et al., 2015; Babot and Forasiepi, 2016). This arrangement agrees with earlier treatments, such as those of Marshall (1978, 1981; Marshall et al., 1990). However, Proborhyaenidae did not emerge as a natural group in all studies (Babot, 2005; Forasiepi et al., 2015).
Most sparassodonts can be viewed as specialized hypercarnivores (Wroe et al., 2004; Prevosti et al., 2013; Zimicz, 2014, López-Aguirre et al., 2016; Croft et al., 2018), with only 10% of species qualifying as omnivores or mesocarnivores utilizing the criteria of Prevosti and Forasiepi (2018). Perhaps the most famous of all sparassodonts is the so-called “marsupial sabertooth,” Thylacosmilus atrox (Riggs, 1933, 1934; figs. 2–5).Its hypertrophied upper canines and correlated cranial modifications have inevitably invited comparisons to Smilodon and other sabertooth placentals —a classic example of convergent evolution (e.g., Riggs, 1933, 1934; Simpson, 1971; Marshall, 1976a, 1977a; Turnbull, 1978; Turnbull and Segall, 1984; Churcher, 1985).
But the dental apparatus is not the only region of striking morphological specialization seen in sabertooth skulls: the auditory regions of Smilodon and Thylacosmilus are likewise remarkably modified compared with those of their close relatives (Turnbull and Segall, 1984). In his initial description of Thylacosmilus, Riggs (1934) provided a brief treatment of its cranial anatomy, based mainly on the holotype (FMNH P14531; figs. 3, 6–8). Turnbull and Segall (1984) reevaluated and extended Riggs' interpretations, adding detailed descriptions of the paratype (FMNH P14344; figs. 4, 9, 10). They identified several otic features of Thylacosmilus that, if correctly interpreted, would not only be novel for sparassodonts but unique among metatherians. These identifications are given special attention in this paper.
Thanks to the availability of µCT scanning, we have been able to reevaluate Turnbull and Segall's (1984) descriptions, which by necessity had to be largely based on surface anatomy. However, unexpected difficulties in identifying certain features required examination of other fossil evidence for morphological variation in the sparassodont caudal cranium. This was required in any case because the literature on metatherian cranial morphology is limited compared with that available for eutherians. Although metatherians and eutherians are phylogenetic sisters, these two clades have followed different evolutionary (and morphological) trajectories for the past ∼130 Ma (O'Leary et al., 2013). As a result, conditions in fossil metatherians need to be interpreted on their own terms, and not merely viewed as special instances of what can be observed in eutherians.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Specimens
Thylacosmilus: The specimens principally utilized for this study are the holotype (FMNH P14531; figs. 3, 6–8), which is in good condition overall, and the paratype (FMNH P14344; figs. 4, 9, 10), which has suffered considerable erosional damage but retains a reasonably intact caudal cranium. Additional details on basicranial construction were retrieved from T . atrox MMP 1443-M (figs. 5, 11). Other specimens reviewed in this paper are listed in table 1.
Goin and Pascual (1987) have shown that the numerous Late Miocene/Pliocene thylacosmilid species named in the 20th century cannot be meaningfully distinguished from one another and should therefore be regarded as synonyms of Thylacosmilus atrox, the earliest valid name apart from an unused senior synonym (Achlysictis lelongi, now suppressed; see Goin and Pascual, 1987) coined by Ameghino (1891). The amount of individual variation within T . atrox as currently defined is certainly substantial (e.g., Thylacosmilus FMNH P14531, P14344, and MMP 1443-M; figs. 3–5). Because of their notable difference in size, the holotype and paratype were thought by Riggs (1934: 9) to be of greatly different ontogenetic ages. He described the paratype as “a young adult specimen,” basing his assessment on the fact that “the mandible is nearly one fourth smaller in linear dimensions than that of the holotype.” However, we found that the dentitions were notably worn in both specimens, indicating that any difference in their ontogenetic ages could not have been very considerable. It is possible that sexual dimorphism, perhaps in combination with or amplified by individual variation (Goin and Pascual, 1987), played an important role in producing such wide ranges in size, even in fossils of similar ontogenetic age. In fact, even though less pronounced than in Thylacosmilus, substantial morphological variability has been demostrated for other sparassodonts (e.g., in Cladosictis patagonica, expressed as differences in mandibular size and shape; Echarri et al., 2017), just as it has in extant mammals generally (e.g., Lindenfors et al., 2007).
It is important to note that Turnbull and Segall (1984) made modifications to the holotype and paratype in the course of their investigation. First, the apparent outlines of several sutures were drawn with indelible ink on both specimens. Although many of these tracings correspond fairly well to actual boundaries between bone territories as seen in the scans, in some cases they do not, or the situation is ambiguous. For a given suture to be named as such in this paper there must be secure evidence of it, either macroscopically or in the segmental data. This issue principally affects evaluation of bullar composition. Although both specimens can be described as reasonably well preserved, bullar surfaces display hairline breaks that cannot be easily distinguished from sutures. In a second modification of the fossil material, Turnbull and Segall (1984) removed most of the right bulla of the paratype in order to better explore middle ear anatomy. Fortunately, the detached bulla was kept with the rest of the skull, permitting us to provide some additional interpretrations of its morphology.
Other Metatheria: The comparative set of fossil and extant specimens utilized in this paper is listed in table 1. Certain features whose relations or ontogeny are uncertain were traced in serially sectioned pouch young of Monodelphis domestica (head length, 8.5 mm; postnatal day 12; DUCEC), Perameles sp . (head length, 17.5 mm; ZIUT), and Macropus eugenii (head length, 29 mm; ZIUT). For additional information on these specimens, see Sánchez-Villagra and Forasiepi (2017). Other data were obtained from the literature.
Anatomical Nomenclature: The nomenclature used in the descriptions largely follows MacPhee (1981) and Wible (2003); a few new terms are introduced and defined where they first occur. For all other definitions of anatomical terms, see appendix 1.
Ct Scanning and Bone Histology
Thylacosmilus atrox (holotype, FMNH P14531). Originally scanned by Larry Witmer (Ohio University) at O'Bleness Memorial Hospital in Athens, Ohio, using a General Electric Light Speed Ultra MultiSlice CT scanner with a slice thickness of 0.625 mm at 120 kV and 200 mA. This scan resulted in a final stack of 433 slices of 307 × 471 pxl.
Thylacosmilus atrox (paratype, FMNH P14344). Scanned on a GE Phoenix vtomex s240 µCT scanner in the laboratory of Zhe-Xi Luo (University of Chicago) with a slice thickness of 0.07 mm at 210 kV, 190 mA. The scan resulted in a final stack of 2022 slices of 1493 × 1180 pxl.
Sipalocyon gracilis (AMNH VP 9254). Scanned on a GE Phoenix vtomex s240 µCT scanner housed at AMNH with a slice thickness of 0.069 mm at 180 kV, 220 mA. The scan resulted in a final stack of 1648 slices of 1037 × 593 pxl.
Borhyaena tuberata (YPM PU 15120, petrosal only). Scanned on a GE Phoenix vtomex s240 µCT scanner housed at AMNH with a slice thickness of 0.012 mm at 180 kV, 220 mA. The scan resulted in a final stack of 1425 slices of 1140 × 886 pxl.
cf. Pharsophorus sp. (AMNH VP 29591, petrosal only). Scanned on a GE Phoenix vtomex s240 µCT scanner housed at AMNH with a slice thickness of 0.012 mm at 180 kV, 220 mA. The scan resulted in a final stack of 1925 slices of 1619 × 1166 pxl.
The open source program 3DSlicer (Fedorov et al., 2012) was used for 3-D reconstruction and segmentation of FMNH P14531 and FMNH P14344. VGStudio MAX (Volume Graphics GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) was used for 3-D reconstruction of the petrosals and inner ear of AMNH VP 9254, YPM PU 15120, and AMNH VP 29591. Linear data were taken using 3DSlicer and open source Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012).
Histological sections were examined with a stereoscopic microscope (Leica MZ 16®); photos were taken with a Leica DFC 420 C® digital camera at the University of Zürich (Sánchez-Villagra and Forasiepi, 2017).
Institutional and Other Abbreviations
AMNH M, Department of Mammalogy, American Museum of Natural History, New York; AMNH VP, Department of Vertebrate Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History; DUCEC, Duke University Comparative Embryology Collection, Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Durham, NC; FMNH, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago; MACN-A, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia,” Ameghino Collection, Buenos Aires, Argentina; MLP, Museo de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina; MMP, Museo Municipal de Ciencias Naturales de Mar del Plata “Lorenzo Scaglia,” Mar del Plata, Argentina; MPM-PV, Museo Regional Provincial “Padre M.J. Molina,” Río Gallegos, Argentina; UCMP, University of California, Museum of Paleontology, Berkeley; YPM PU, Yale Peabody Museum, ex-Collection of Princeton University, New Haven, CT; ZIUT, Zoologisches Institut Universität Tübingen (collection of W. Maier), Germany.
Capital and lower case letters, C/c, canine, P/p, premolar, and M/m, molar, refer to upper and lower teeth, respectively.
COMPARATIVE OSTEOLOGY OF THE CAUDAL CRANIUM OF THYLACOSMILUS AND OTHER SPARASSODONTS
Tympanic Floor And Basicranial Composition in thylacosmilus
Because of the effects of extensive remodeling activity during ontogeny, as well as postmortem damage, the components forming the auditory bulla of adult Thylacosmilus atrox are difficult to identify by simple inspection. This is well illustrated by the history of differing conclusions regarding tympanic floor composition in this species. The first published observations on the basicranial anatomy of Thylacosmilus appeared in Riggs' (1934) monograph, based on notes compiled by Bryan Patterson (and thus cited as such here). Patterson reached no firm conclusions regarding bullar constitution in this taxon, but he did mention, confusingly, that the mastoid, exoccipital, and squamosal appeared to be “overlapping” the bulla, as though the latter were a separate entity. He also stated very tentatively that the alisphenoid might be involved in forming the rostromedial part of the bony tympanic floor, whereas the caudal part was probably formed by the “tympanic wing of the petrosal” (= caudal tympanic process of this element; appendix 1).
In sharp contrast, Turnbull and Segall (1984) concluded that the bulla was not alisphenoid/petrosal in composition, as Patterson seemed to imply, but instead “mastoid”/exoccipital. Without giving definitive reasons, they stated that the bulla is “comprised mainly of the mastoid, which surrounds the [ecto]tympanic, and in part by the exoccipital, which overlaps the mastoid posteriorly” (p. 252). Their presumptive suture line separating these bone territories can be seen in the basicranial view of the holotype (fig. 6A). In their opinion there were no contributions to the floor from pars cochlearis of the petrosal nor any of the other circumjacent bones (i.e., alisphenoid, basisphenoid, basioccipital, squamosal, or ectotympanic).
By contrast, scanning evidence (figs. 7, 8) conclusively establishes that the tympanic floor in Thylacosmilus is formed by the squamosal and exoccipital, without overlapping any other structures except for the ectotympanic. Scans also demonstrate that the ectotympanic does not contribute to any part of the bullar wall but merely contacts it from within (see also fig. 12D). Given previous interpretations, the major surprise is the failure of the petrosal to broadly participate in the formation of the bulla. Scans show that the petrosal bone is relatively small and deeply buried among surrounding elements (fig. 8C, D). There is no projection conforming to the rostral tympanic process on the promontorial surface, and only an insignificant crest at the position of the caudal tympanic process of the petrosal (fig. 19B). The external or “mastoid” surface of pars canalicularis is not exposed caudally, and the rear of the skull is formed solely by occipital and squamosal material (fig. 10).
Unfortunately, scan resolution was not good enough to check whether the bullar suture lines drawn by Turnbull and Segall (1984) were correctly placed. However, assuming their interpretations are correct, in ventral view the squamosal's total contribution would have been somewhat greater than that of the exoccipital (fig. 6). This is certainly possible, but in view of the uncertainties we do not attempt to further refine boundaries of bone territories in the figures. We cannot account for Patterson's observation that the alisphenoid participates in the bullar floor in the form of a tympanic process, although there is a small epitympanic wing of the alisphenoid in the roof of the tympanic cavity (see below and fig. 9).
Turnbull and Segall (1984: 262) inferred that a small collection of bone fragments attached to the tympanic roof on the open right side of the paratype might represent remains of the rostral crus of the ectotympanic and ossicles (fig. 9B, C). The ossicular pieces are too damaged for worthwhile description. The putative ectotympanic fragment (fig. 9C: ?EC) bears no diagnostic features of that element. In any case, the authors inferred from this evidence that the ectotympanic was probably U-shaped: “The main triangular piece [of the rostral crus] is too reduced to be the entire tympanic bone, and we assume that most of the probably very fragile ring portion must be missing.”
The scan of the unopened left middle ear of the paratype reveals that their inference regarding the form of the ectotympanic was largely correct: a scatter of small bone fragments, as well as a crescentic, thin-walled structure, identifiable as ectotympanic, can be seen embedded in the matrix filling the tympanic cavity (fig. 12D). The crescentic structure is slightly displaced relative to the porus meatus, perhaps because it was broken away when the middle ear filled with sediment. Nevertheless, in modelling this structure from different perspectives in relation to other otic features we found that it retains its primary orientation, with the preserved part of the crista tympani crossing the ventral part of the element, the incisure facing upward, and the presumed rostral crus facing rostrally. We were able to closely compare this specimen to a detached ectotympanic of Cladosictis patagonica (fig. 13). Such features as the crura, crista tympani, and styliform process are closely comparable to their apparent homologs in the latter, justifying the conclusion that the ectotympanic of Thylacosmilus was unexpanded and attached to the walls of the tympanic cavity by means of the crural apices (the tips of which were probably broken off during burial). Presumably, the ectotympanic fitted snugly against the medial aspect of the porus, as in the monito del monte (Dromiciops gliroides) (Segall, 1969a, see also Sánchez-Villagra and Wible, 2002; Giannini et al., 2004), tree shrews (e.g., Tupaia spp.), and lemurs (e.g., Lemur spp.) (MacPhee, 1981; Wible, 2009, 2011) whose ectotympanics are somewhat similar in shape and position. In Thylacosmilus the element's exact positioning cannot be reconstructed from the evidence at hand. Given its small size and so-called intrabullar or aphaneric position, the ectotympanic could not have made any more than an incidental contribution to meatal walls in Thylacosmilus.
The external acoustic meatus of Thylacosmilus is a deep funnel (fig. 7C) with a distinctive teardrop shape in lateral view (figs. 3A, 5A, 6). The meatus is rostrally delimited by the entoglenoid region and caudally by the posttympanic process (arising from the caudal tympanic process of the squamosal; appendix 1). The ectotympanic does not participate in this configuration, which is why Patterson (in Riggs, 1934) described it as a “meatus spurius” (in effect, a meatus formed entirely by squamosal material; van der Klaauw, 1931: 138). Turnbull and Segall (1984) noted that the meatal walls converge ventrally to form a deep cleft, corresponding to the glaserian fissure for the passage of chorda tympani (fig. 7A; see Tympanic Floor Composition in the Comparative Set).
In the segmental images we saw nothing unusual in the form of the meatus. However, in the holotype Turnbull and Segall (1984: 252) identified an apparent secondary aperture, in the form of a gap in the meatal wall opening into the “hypotympanic sinus” of the tympanic cavity: “This could have been a direct air channel, bypassing the tympanum, or it could have been membrane-covered and acted as an extension of the tympanum.” They did not provide an illustration of this opening in their photographs of the skull, and it cannot be identified on the scanned left side. In any case, on functional and comparative grounds a secondary opening is very unlikely. An opening to the exterior via an accessory “direct air channel” would be the functional equivalent of having a burst eardrum. Even if it were closed off in life by the epithelial lining of the tympanic cavity, the net effect of such an arrangement would probably be hearing loss, not gain. The most likely explanation is that the authors misinterpreted the exit aperture of the postglenoid canal, which lies close to and opens within the meatus' rostral wall (transected twice where the bulla was cut away in the paratype; fig. 9A, C: pgc).
We agree from the size of the sphenoid tubercles (figs. 6, 8A, B, 11) that the rostralmost prevertebral neck muscles (longus capitis, rectus capitis ventralis mm.) were greatly enlarged in Thylacosmilus (see Turnbull, 1978; Argot, 2004a). The distance from the origins of these muscles to their vertebral insertions would have helped to increase the mechanical advantage of flexion in the cervical vertebrae and therefore the force of the stabbing canines (Wroe et al., 2013). Tubercle elongation deepens the central stem significantly as seen in sections (fig. 8A, B). In consequence, the tubercles help to create a lengthy, steep-walled cleft (jugular fissure) between the central stem and the bulla (fig. 8D), positionally equivalent to, but much deeper than, the embryological basicapsular fissure (MacPhee, 1981). The line of the fissure is continued by a small ridge on the lateral margin of the basioccipital, where it nearly abuts the bullar wall (fig. 8C; asterisk). Whether this qualifies as a true tympanic process is moot: the flange may be close to the bullar wall, but it does not actually face onto the middle ear.
Tympanic Floor Composition in the Comparative Set
The usual interpretation of the plesiomorphic metatherian tympanic floor is that it was mem- branous, lacking any bony contribution other than that provided by the ectotympanic, as in a number of Mesozoic and early Cenozoic nonmarsupial metatherians (e.g., Muizon, 1994, 1998; Marshall and Muizon, 1995; Rougier et al., 1998; Ladevèze and Muizon, 2007; Muizon et al., 2018). Exceptions include Asiatherium reshetovi. Didelphodon vorax, and herpetotheriids, all of which possessed an alisphenoid tympanic process (Szalay and Trofimov 1996; Horovitz et al., 2008, 2009; Wilson et al., 2016). Presence of the caudal tympanic process of the petrosal can be considered plesiomorphic for both eutherians and metatherians (MacPhee, 1981; Wible, 1984). The presence of entotympanics in marsupials has been claimed several times (e.g., van der Klaauw, 1931; Wood-Jones, 1949; Segall, 1969a,1969b, 1970, 1971; Aplin, 1990; Norris, 1993; Hershkovitz, 1992). However, this structure has never been conclusively demonstrated (e.g., MacPhee, 1979; Reig et al., 1987; Maier, 1989; Sánchez-Villagra and Wible, 2002; Sánchez-Villagra and Forasiepi, 2017). Nevertheless, the possibility deserves further examination (see discussion in Sánchez-Villagra and Forasiepi, 2017).
In extant South American marsupials the composition of the tympanic floor is generally conservative. Apart from the ectotympanic, the only elements involved are tympanic outgrowths of the alisphenoid and petrosal—the latter in the form of the rostral tympanic process of the petrosal only, as seen in didelphids and caenolestids, or both a rostral and a caudal tympanic process of the petrosal as in microbiotheriids (Osgood, 1921; Segall, 1969a, 1969b; 1970; Archer, 1976; Reig et al., 1987; Sánchez-Villagra and Wible, 2002; Voss and Jansa, 2003, 2009; Giannini et al., 2004). In extant Australian marsupials the tympanic floor has a much more variable constitution; e.g., rostral tympanic process of the squamosal in the wombats Vombatus ursinus and Lasiorhinus latifrons (Wegner, 1964); tympanic process of the exoccipital in the mulgara Dasycercus cristacauda (Archer, 1976).
Sparassodonts also differ from the plesiomorphic pattern in the caudal part of the basicranium. In most metatherians (e.g., Didelphodon. Mayulestes, didelphids, dasyurids; Clemens, 1966; Reig et al., 1987; Muizon, 1998; Wible, 2003), the occipitals, squamosal, and petrosal consistently bound the walls of the middle ear as seen in caudal view. By contrast, in all sparassodonts that we have examined, this region is exclusively bounded by the squamosal and exoccipital, although the suture separating these bones may be difficult to detect. However, whether they should be considered as tympanic processes is a matter of interpretation. In Borhyaena and Prothylacynus the projections of the squamosal and exoccipital that caudally border the tympanic cavity per se are functionally related to, and represent continuations of, the nuchal crest for support of musculature of the neck and hyoid. In comparative morphological terms they are more meaningfully identified as posttympanic and paracondylar (“paroccipital”) processes of the squamosal and exoccipital respectively (sensu Evans and Christensen, 1979; see also Wible, 2003, 2009, 2011).
The rostral tympanic process of the petrosal is never conspicuous in Sparassodonta. Although in Borhyaena (fig. 20C) and Prothylacynus (fig. 15) there are ridges in the expected locations for both rostral and caudal tympanic processes of the petrosal, they are tiny in comparison with skull size. Indeed, the rostral ridge is better interpreted as the margin of the carotid sulcus (on this point, see Muizon et al., 2018).
In all hathliacynids for which there is basicranial evidence, the rostral or rostromedial wall of the bulla is formed by a distinct alisphenoid tympanic process (e.g., Sipalocyon, fig. 14 [process broken]), although Sallacyon might be an exception (Muizon, 1998; but see also Muizon, 1999). Unlike hathliacynids, which exhibit nearly complete bullae, the borhyaenoid tympanic floor was membranous (apart from the ectotympanic), lacking both an alisphenoid contribution as well as the rostral tympanic process of the squamosal. The only known exception to the unossified tympanic floor among borhyaenoids is Thylacosmilus, with its compound squamosal/exoccipital bulla (fig. 6).
In a number of metatherians, Muizon (1994, 1998, 1999; Muizon et al., 1997) has described a fingerlike deviation of the squamoso-alisphenoid suture in the entoglenoid region (his medial process of the squamosal), such that the suture extended toward or even intersected the lateral border of foramen ovale. Utilizing this definition of the medial process of the squamosal, he found this feature in Pucadelphys. Andinodelphys. Mayulestes, and some sparassodonts, including Sallacyon (Muizon, 1994: fig. 2B) Notogale (Muizon, 1999: fig. 4), and Cladosictis. Sipalocyon. Prothylacynus. Borhyaena, and Paraborhyaena (Muizon, 1999). The process is also seen in some extant marsupials (vombatiforms; Muizon, 1999). However, we were unable to identify such a projection in either Prothylacynus (fig. 15) or Borhyaena (fig. 16), and this feature appears also to be absent in Hondadelphys and Arctodictis (Forasiepi, 2009). In each of these cases, the suture between the squamosal and the alisphenoid lacks any medial deviation toward foramen ovale in the manner described by Muizon. Sutures in this area of the skull are obliterated in the Thylacosmilus holotype and MMP 1443-M. If one accepts Turnbull and Segall's (1984) suture line in the paratype, alisphenoid territory bounds the foramen ovale (fig. 4B), and there is no fingerlike deviation of the squamoso-alisphenoid suture. Conditions in other sparassodont specimens examined for this study (e.g., Cladosictis, Sipalocyon) are ambiguous, as sutures in this region are either poorly defined, obliterated, or still covered in matrix. However, if medial deviation of the squamoso-alisphenoid suture is specifically a hathliacynid synapomorphy, its inconstant appearance in other sparassodont clades must reflect separate acquisition, in which case it cannot be regarded as a synapomorphy of the whole order.
More recently, Muizon et al. (2018: 403, char. 185 [1]) redefined the medial process as that part of the squamosal that “extends into the middle ear and forms part of the roof of the hypotympanic sinus” (i.e., tympanic roof, as understood in this paper). In their treatment, character 185(1) is one of three synapomorphies uniquely defining Pucadelphyda. However, it will be interesting to test whether participation of the squamosal in the tympanic roof is actually primitive for metatherians, as it also appears to be for eutherians (MacPhee, 1981).
The ectotympanic is unknown in most borhyaenoids. In Paraborhyaena boliviana, Petter and Hoffstetter (1983) described an ectotympanic that is not U-shaped, but is instead mediolaterally expanded into an elongated tube that must have been only lightly attached to the skull, given the absence of a larger bony framework that would have been provided by other floor components. This configuration is remarkably convergent on the ectotympanic of extant Vombatus (e.g., Wegner, 1964), which in this taxon assumes the form of a lengthy funnel produced by complete crural fusion along the ectotympanic's axis of elongation. The two taxa differ in that the tympanic floor of Paraborhyaena was otherwise not significantly ossified, as it lacked the alisphenoid tympanic process (Muizon, 1999).
Evidence for the ectotympanic in hathliacynids is more abundant. This element is preserved to some extent in a number of specimens (e.g., Cladosictis patagonica MLP 11-58, YPM PU 15705, YPM PU 15170, MPM 4326; Notogale cf. mitis MNHN SAL 271; Acyon myctoderos MNHN-BolV-003668; see Patterson, 1965; Muizon, 1999; Forasiepi et al., 2006). The following notes are mainly based on Cladosictis patagonica YPM PU 15170, the detached right ectotympanic of which is very well preserved (fig. 13). In this species the bulla is incomplete and the ectotympanic is thus only partly enclosed by tympanic processes of the alisphenoid and squamosal. Apparent facets for these processes occur on the ectotympanic crura, suggesting there may have been sutural contact among these bone territories. The rostral crus is longer, wider, and straighter than the caudal crus, a similarity to Acyon and apparently Notogale (Muizon, 1999; Forasiepi et al., 2006) (fig. 13). The caudal crus exhibits three small tubercles, the rostralmost being largest. The ectotympanics of Notogale and Acyon are similar in this regard (Muizon, 1999; Forasiepi et al., 2006). The narrow gap (tympanic incisure) between the free ends of the rostral and caudal crura is about 3 mm, representing about half the maximum rostrocaudal length of the bone.
The rostral crus features several shallow grooves, including a longitudinal channel on its medial side that presumably housed the rostral process of the malleus (cf. condition in Thylacosmilus; fig. 12A). From the base of the rostral crus a styliform process (van der Klaauw, 1931) juts toward the entoglenoid region of the squamosal, where it entered a small impression that continues forward as a groove. This arrangement marks the position of the glaserian fissure in mammals with more complete bullae. It is reasonable to assume that the neurovascular grooves on the ectotympanic and entoglenoid were aligned, and doubtless also accommodated the chorda tympani (CN VII) as it departed the auditory region for the infratemporal fossa to be relayed by the lingual nerve of CN V3. Similar grooves on the entoglenoid region of the squamosal have been observed in other hathliacynids (Muizon, 1999) and borhyaenoids, including the Thylacosmilus atrox holotype and MMP 1443-M, Prothylacynus patagonicus MACN-A 5931, and Borhyaena tuberata YPM PU 15701. The combination of styliform process and distinct entoglenoid groove has not been observed in the comparative set of living marsupials (e.g., Didelphis. Monodelphis, Dasyurus, Sarcophilus, Vombatus, Lasiorhinus; figs. 17, 18).
Petrosal Morphology
External morphology: Based on the 3-D model of the left petrosal of the paratype illustrated in figure 19, no part of the petrosal is externally visible, as noted previously; the bone is deeply recessed within the basicranium and making no contribution to the bulla. Microstructural detail in segmental data is consistent with appositional bone having been extensively deposited on both the cochlear and canalicular portions of the petrosal during ontogeny. This has produced some morphological complexity, such as the long, spitlike anteromedial flange on the rostral pole (fig. 19A).
In contrast to most extant marsupials, hathliacynids, and indeed most mammals, the major axis of the petrosal in Thylacosmilus is not parallel to the rostrocaudal horizontal plane of the skull but is instead positioned nearly vertically (fig. 8C). This unusual orientation is, however, seen in other borhyaenoids (e.g., Paraborhyaena, Petter and Hoffstetter, 1983; Callistoe, Babot et al., 2002; Australohyaena, Forasiepi et al., 2015; see also Muizon et al., 2018), indicating that it is not correlated with bullar hypertrophy. To avoid confusion our descriptions will utilize conventional directions, as though the petrosal were oriented in a more typical manner.
The 3-D model indicates that, despite damage (fig. 19: asterisks), major features of the petrosal can still be reliably identified. In tympanic view (fig. 19A), the gently rounded promontorium displays neither a rostral process nor any sulci on its ventral surface that might be attributed to the passage of vessels or nerves. The fossula fenestrae cochleae, slightly enlarged by breakage, opens caudomedially while the fenestra vestibuli faces directly caudally. These features are partly bordered by the diminutive caudal tympanic process (fig. 19B), which also partly borders the fossa for the stapedius muscle. The lateral surface displays a narrow shelf, here regarded as a small tegmen tympani, that is deeply grooved by a sulcus for the greater petrosal nerve. Identification is based on the fact that the groove emanates from the cavum supracochleare, the chamber housing the geniculate ganglion (exposed by breakage; fig. 19A, B). The facial sulcus can be seen emanating from the caudal end of the cavum. Arising from the rostral pole, the anteromedial flange presents a large depression on its lateral surface that we tentatively identify as the fossa for tensor tympani muscle (fig. 19B).
The major features on the cerebellar surface (fig. 19C) are the internal acoustic meatus and subarcuate fossa. Large borhyaenoids are characterized by a very shallow to essentially nonexistent subarcuate fossa (e.g., Lycopsis, Marshall, 1977b; Arctodictis, Forasiepi, 2009). In comparison to these large borhyaenoids, the subarcuate fossa of Thylacosmilus is actually deep, with its greatest diameter at the level of its aperture. The internal acoustic meatus is also deeper than in most other sparassodonts (e.g., Sipalocyon, fig. 20A; Borhyaena, fig. 20B; but see Arctodictis, Forasiepi, 2009). The cochlear canaliculus was identifiable on the petrosal's ventromedial margin, but in the 3-D model the aperture for the endolymphatic duct was not evident (see Internal morphology).
There is no “mastoid” exposure of pars canalicularis in the rear of the skull in Thylacosmilus, which is a similarity to several other sparassodonts (e.g., Sallacyon. Notogale. Cladosictis. Lycopsis. Prothylacynus. Borhyaena. Arctodictis. Australohyaena. Paraborhyaena; see Muizon, 1999; Forasiepi, 2009; Forasiepi et al., 2015; Muizon et al., 2018). We tentatively confirm that there is no mastoid exposure in Sipalocyon . Although there is an enlargement of the lateral part of pars canalicularis (fig. 20A: asterisk), the occipital area of the skull is broken and the mastoid exposure cannot be definitely confirmed.
In the scanned specimens of Thylacosmilus definite evidence of a prootic canal for the lateral head vein is lacking. However, as noted by Muizon et al. (2018), in Borhyaena YPM PU 15120 there is a channel, partly broken, for this vessel (fig. 20C). It is oriented toward the superior border of the petrosal, where it presumably met the prootic sinus in life. There is also an identifiable prootic canal in Sipalocyon AMNH VP 9254 (see also Muizon et al., 2018), which is complete. It can be traced from the external lip of the secondary facial foramen to the dorsal surface of the petrosal, where it intersects the large channel for the prootic sinus (fig. 20A).
Lastly, misattributed specimens are a separate category of concern in studies of cranial morphology, as they may affect character analysis of the group to which they have been assigned. A case in point is the isolated petrosal (fig. 20E, F) attributed to the borhyaenoid cf. Pharsophorus sp. by Marshall (1978). The specimen has long been associated with a juvenile skull attributed to the genus Pharsophorus (AMNH VP 29591), found near but not within the famous Scarritt Pocket (Deseadan) excavated by George Gaylord Simpson. Chaffee (1952: 515), who described the skull, explicitly stated that it was “badly crushed” and “lacking the basicranial region,” making it uncertain what the source of the isolated petrosal actually was. It is important to emphasize that this specimen differs from known sparassodont petrosals in several ways, including: (1) tegmen tympani very large, (2) expanded, shelflike medial margin of the petrosal, and (3) ?mastoid exposure on cranial sidewall. The tegmen tympani is characteristically small in marsupials, and often lacks the rostral portion commonly found in placentals (van Kampen, 1905). In marsupials the medial margin of pars cochlearis normally ends flush with the bones comprising the central stem. In the attributed petrosal, this margin is significantly expanded into a shelf (fig. 20E: double asterisks), resembling to some degree petrosal conformation in certain South American native ungulates (see Billet, 2011). Finally, the region caudal to the fossula fenestrae cochleae is smooth surfaced rather than roughened (as would be expected for a sutural surface) and it is punctuated by foramina (fig. 20E: triple asterisks). This combination of features suggests that the isolated petrosal is not that of a sparassodont, but belonged to some other, as yet unidentified, eutherian (possibly but not certainly a South American native ungulate).
Internal morphology: Figure 21A–C presents a 3-D model of the left osseous labyrinth of the paratype, compared to models of Sipalocyon AMNH VP 9254 (fig. 21D–F) and Borhyaena YPM PU 15120 (fig. 21G–I) in similar orientations. Although there is clearly variation among these taxa, comparative data on the inner ear of sparassodonts is currently too limited for assessment of any systematic or functional significance this variation implies.
In Thylacosmilus the maximum length of the canalicular portion is short, at least in relation to the length of the cochlear portion. The cochlea in Thylacosmilus displays approximately 2.5 complete turns, comparable to some modern marsupials (e.g., Sánchez-Villagra and Schmelzle, 2007). In nonmarsupial metatherians the cochlea is less coiled (e.g., Herpetotherium, 1.6 turns; Horovitz et al., 2008; see also Meng and Fox, 1995). A low number of turns is also seen in Australian marsupials (Sánchez-Villagra and Schmelzle, 2007). In Sipalocyon (∼2.2; fig. 21E) and in particular Borhyaena (∼1.9; fig. 21H), the number of cochlear turns is lower. In this latter taxon cochlear coiling is also less compact. The height/length of the anterior semicircular canal is greater than that of the posterior semicircular canal, a feature that has been correlated with a tendency toward upright body posture in a variety of vertebrates (Witmer et al., 2003; Sánchez-Villagra and Schmelzle, 2007). However, there is no basis for making this assumption about body posture in Thylacosmilus, whose locomotor adaptations suggest quadrupedalism with some degree of cursoriality (Argot, 2004a, 2004b). The disproportion seen between the anterior and posterior semicircular canals is much less marked in Sipalocyon and Borhyaena (fig. 21D, G). The lateral semicircular canal of Borhyaena (fig. 21G) displays a curious undulation not seen in the other examined sparassodonts, although it is present in Vombatus and Phascolarctos (Sánchez-Villagra and Schmelzle, 2007).
The secondary crus commune, formed by the junction of the lateral and posterior semicircular canals at their entry into the vestibule, has been found in a wide variety of extant marsupials (e.g., some didelphids, paucituberculatans, dasyurids, peramelids), as well as some fossil taxa (e.g., Herpetotherium. Mimoperadectes. Diprotodon. Thylacoleo. Palaeothentes; Sánchez-Villagra and Schmelzle, 2007; Schmelzle et al., 2007; Horovitz et al., 2008, 2009; Alloing-Séguier et al., 2013; Forasiepi et al., 2014). Wide distribution combined with much within-clade variation suggests its presence may be plesiomorphic, perhaps at the level of Mammaliaformes (Ruf et al., 2013). None of the three sparassodonts examined here has a secondary crus commune.
In dorsal view, the length of the lateral semicircular canal in Thylacosmilus (fig. 21C) is similar to that of the posterior semicircular canal, as in Borhyaena (fig. 21I), while in Sipalocyon the posterior semicircular canal is slightly longer (fig. 21F). On the basis of conditions in diprotodontians, Sánchez-Villagra and Schmelzle (2007) hypothesized that in this case equal canal length is correlated with arborealism, the argument being that relative lengthening of the lateral canal increases the sensitivity of equilibration. However, among the sparassodonts examined here, only Sipalocyon is considered to have been arboreal or scansorial. The other two taxa are reconstructed as having been exclusively terrestrial (see Argot, 2003a, 2003b; 2004a, 2004b; Ercoli et al., 2012).
Head position in Thylacosmilus: For any vertebrate, habitual head posture is an important functional constraint on the kinds of activities that can be efficiently undertaken (Spoor et al., 2007; Coutier et al., 2017). Because of data limitations, head posture in Thylacosmilus can be estimated only on the basis of the paratype, which is highly incomplete (fig. 22A–C). As the basisphenoid is badly eroded in this specimen, as a proxy we chose the flattest portion of the basioccipital as seen in a micro-CT segment passing close to the midsagittal plane. Next, we superimposed on this image two points marking the ends of the lateral semicircular canal (fig. 22C). The dihedral angle (30°) formed by lines passed through these points and intersecting the basioccipital planum provides the basis for estimating head posture (De Beer, 1947). To present the result pictorially (fig. 22A), the paratype in lateral aspect was superimposed on a depiction of the holotype in the same aspect, slightly distorted to accommodate the paratype's smaller dimensions. Functionally, the importance of the ability to significantly incline the head, and therewith the snout, is that it maximizes the visual field. This was presumably critical for Thylacosmilus as a pursuit carnivore (Argot, 2004a) presumably capable of some degree of binocular vision.
The most serious limitation with our procedure is that the angle between the basioccipital planum and the basisphenoid (which is normally used for head posture estimation) is unknown in the paratype. However, given the form of the planum in Thylacosmilus our overall posture estimate is probably close to a minimum.
Tympanic Roof Composition and Middle Ear Pneumatization in Thylacosmilus and Comparative Set
The tympanic roof of Thylacosmilus is composed of the epitympanic wings of four bones (alisphenoid, squamosal, exoccipital, and petrosal; appendix 1), plus the ventral bulge of the cochlea. Apart from highly autapomorphous Thylacosmilus, there is little variation in tympanic roof features in Sparassodonta. This also applies to middle ear pneumatization: most sparassodonts exhibit an uninflated, uncompartmentalized middle ear cavity, whereas Thylacosmilus presents the opposite extreme. We have not undertaken a thorough survey of pneumatization in metatherians and therefore restrict ourselves to observations having a direct bearing on the morphological interpretation of Thylacosmilus (fig. 23A–C).
There is notable variation in the degree of bullar inflation in the three Thylacosmilus specimens described in this contribution (figs. 6, 9, 11). Most of this is probably related to either sex or individual variation. However, one area affected by variable pneumatization has proven difficult to interpret.
Piriform fenestra: The gap in the base of the skull between the auditory capsule and its outgrowths and the epitympanic wings of the alisphenoid and squamosal (= piriform fenestra; appendix 1) seems to have been affected by the degree of pneumatization. In the paratype, the fenestra was excluded from the middle ear cavity (fig. 9B, C). This is harder to establish in the other two specimens because of breakage or incomplete preparation. As far as we can determine, the bullae of the holotype and MMP 1443-M (figs. 6, 11) are more inflated rostromedially than is the case in the paratype, and thus encroach on the fenestra's borders to a greater extent. In most other sparassodonts the piriform fenestra lies external to the tympanic cavity, with some portion of the fenestra remaining patent into adulthood. In some taxa the unossified portion of the tympanic roof is so extensive that the fenestra can be properly said to lie within the definitive middle ear (e.g., Prothylacynus. Borhyaena; figs. 15, 16). In the specimens of Thylacosmilus, the fenestra is best seen on the prepared right side of the paratype (fig. 9B, C), where it is exposed adjacent to the bulla's rostromedial extremity. Probably the only structures that actually passed through, as opposed to across, the fenestra were emissary veins and the greater petrosal nerve (CN VII) traveling from the hiatus of the facial canal to meet the deep petrosal nerve in the pterygoid canal.
Epitympanic wings: The alisphenoid contribution to the roof of the tympanic cavity (= alisphenoid epitympanic wing; appendix 1) is small in Thylacosmilus, framing only the lateral margin of the piriform fenestra (fig. 9B, C). The exoccipital epitympanic wing is somewhat larger and is deeply indented by the primary jugular foramen. Largest is the squamosal epitympanic wing, which makes up almost all of the lateral part of the roof except for a zone of uncertain extent adjacent to the lateral aspect of the promontorium. Turnbull and Segall (1984) drew a line across this part of the paratype's right tympanic roof (fig. 9B), which implies that they detected a suture in this position (although they did not specifically mention this in their text). Given its location, the bone areas involved would have to be the squamosal wing just mentioned and the tegmen tympani. However, the area attributable to the tegmen on the basis of suture position is comparatively large, at least for a marsupial, and thus requires confirmation. Conditions in the paratype as revealed by scanning are somewhat unclear because of breakage, but in our 3-D model of the entire petrosal (fig. 19A), the shelf extending from pars canalicularis is much narrower than would be expected on the basis of Turnbull and Segall (1984)'s suture line. Likewise, cross sections (e.g., fig. 7D) indicate that the petrosal is not expanded laterally to any significant extent in this specimen. We conclude that they may have misinterpreted, as a suture line, a break in the sediment that still fills this part of the tympanic roof. In sum, the tegminal portion of the roof could not have been as large as Turnbull and Segall (1984) indicated, although it was possibly somewhat larger than the tiny tuberculum tympani usually distinguished in marsupials as the apparent homolog of the placental tegmen tympani (Wible, 2003).
As noted, many sparassodonts have relatively unexpanded middle ear cavities. Although there is little variation in tympanic roof content in terms of contributing elements, their relative sizes and dispositions vary to some extent. Thus, in Borhyaena (fig. 16) the roof remained largely membranous due to the failure of the squamosal and alisphenoid to produce epitympanic wings large enough to substantially reduce the size of the piriform fenestra during ontogeny, something also seen in some placentals (e.g., soricids, tenrecoids; MacPhee, 1981). Nor does the petrosal make any significant epitympanic contribution in this borhyaenid (fig. 20C). By contrast, in Sipalocyon (fig. 14) the tuberculum tympani/tegmen tympani fills much of the posterolateral part of the roof, whereas in Notogale, according to Muizon (1999), the petrosal contribution is even more extensive. In Arctodictis (Forasiepi, 2009) the alisphenoid epitympanic wing is effectively absent as such, the body of the alisphenoid merely providing a rostral border for the piriform fenestra. In hathliacynids, however, the alisphenoid epitympanic wing can be quite extensive, as in Notogale (Muizon, 1999), where it helps to enclose a large paratympanic space (= “hypotympanic” sinus; van der Klaauw, 1931; see also appendix 1). Clearly, however, the size of the alisphenoid contribution is not solely dependent on the degree to which the middle ear expands rostrally, because the wing in Thylacosmilus is tiny despite the overall degree of pneumatization in this taxon.
Paratympanic spaces: Turnbull and Segall (1984: fig. 7A, B) used silicone rubber to produce a cast of the right middle ear of the paratype, but the result as illustrated in their paper is difficult to orient because of the lack of landmarks. They also developed a complicated terminology to describe these spaces, which we will avoid here. Renderings produced from segmental data (fig. 23A–C) give a better idea of how various chambers are situated relative to other structures, such as the faces of the petrosal bone. Any shape differences between these renderings and the Turnbull-Segall model are presumably due to the failure of the silicone rubber to completely penetrate certain pockets.
Turnbull and Segall (1984) correctly noted that the greatly enlarged middle ear cavity of Thylacosmilus deeply penetrates most of the bones of the caudal cranium, thereby creating a series of continuous but quasidiscrete paratympanic spaces (their “hypotympanic sinus” and its several divisions). In figure 23, the middle ear cavity is oriented in relation to the horizontal plane as indicated by the lateral semicircular canal. This facilitated naming the dilatations of the middle ear cavity according to their relative position in life. The ventral, lateral, and caudal paratympanic spaces are the easiest to define morphologically because they can be delimited by small constrictions and inflations that follow the shape of the bones they invaded. In Thylacosmilus the comparatively large volume contained within the middle ear was mostly disposed ventrally and caudally, so that (unlike the case with many mammals with large middle ear cavities) there were no spaces produced by pneumatization of the more dorsal portions of the squamosal or petromastoid. However, the functional result was presumably the same.
The medial end of the external acoustic meatus, which in life would have been closed by the tympanic membrane, is represented by the area above the promontorium in figure 23A (circle), which depicts the model in lateral view. The major diverticula lying ventral to the promontorium are organized along a sharp incline, with the lateral paratympanic space (= epitympanic sinus; see van der Klaauw, 1931) extending above the position of the tympanic cavity per se (fig. 23C). The caudal paratympanic space arches dorsally and caudally, which reflects the fact that this diverticulum hollows out much of the exoccipital almost to the level of the condyles (which are themselves dorsal to the plane of the external acoustic meatus). The relative positioning of major spaces is similar in medial perspective (fig. 23B). The ventral paratympanic space displays some accessory bulges that can be correlated with the unnamed swellings seen on the external bullar surface (fig. 9).
Also noteworthy is the difference in bullar proportions in specimens of Thylacosmilus. In MMP 1443-M, the lateral wall of the bulla extends outward much more than it does in the holotype, suggesting a relatively more inflated lateral paratympanic cavity (figs. 6, 11). Like spots on balloons blown up to different degrees, differences in bullar inflation presumably explain the slightly different relative locations of the posttympanic process and the stylomastoid foramen in these specimens.
In living mammals, large tympanic membrane areas and voluminous, compliant middle ear spaces correlate to a significant degree with low frequency audition (Rosowski, 1994), although cochlear architecture of course plays the dominant role (Manoussaki et al., 2008). However, an accurate measure of the size of the tympanic membrane of Thylacosmilus is not possible given the fossil material at hand, it is reasonable to infer that the large size of the paratympanic spaces helped to reduce impedance and the transfer of sound energy to the ossicular chain.
Features Related to Nerves and Blood Vessels in Thylacosmilus and Comparative Set
Although the anatomical correlates of cranial arteries have been studied by vertebrate paleontologists and morphologists for more than a century (e.g., van Kampen, 1905; Gregory, 1910, 1920; van der Klaauw, 1931), the venous network has been mostly ignored. CT scanning allows an unprecedented opportunity to improve our understanding of vascular morphology in under-examined taxa such as metatherians.
Most of the apertures perforating or crossing the basicranium of Thylacosmilus can be plausibly identified by reference to known conditions in extant marsupials. Here we concentrate on vascular features that have proven difficult to interpret or have been incorrectly identified in other investigations. Channels that are easily and securely identified are depicted in the figures but not otherwise discussed.
Carotid foramen and canal: Turnbull and Segall (1984: 252, fig. 2B) did not indicate or discuss the position of the carotid foramen in Thylacosmilus. They noted that in the holotype a “sizeable [foramen lacerum] medium borders the anteromedial end of the [petrosal] at the medial end of the chamber” (Turnbull and Segall, 1984: 262), which is equivalent to the piriform fenestra of this paper. However, they did not attribute any function to the fenestra, which in any case never transmits the internal carotid in metatherians (in contrast to the case in some eutherians; see Discussion).
In fact, there is a true carotid foramen on the basicranium of the holotype of Thylacosmilus, but it is located in an incompletely prepared area on the basisphenoid between the hypertrophied sphenoidal tubercle and the medial bullar wall (fig. 6). Segmental data reveal that each carotid foramen opens into a canal that passes through the substance of the ipsilateral sphenoidal tubercle, to meet the canal for the opposite carotid artery at the hypophyseal fossa (fig. 8A). There the vessels presumably joined to form the rostral terminus of the circulus arteriosus. In the holotype the foramen is located slightly more caudally on the basicranium (relative to foramen ovale) than in the paratype or MMP 1443-M, perhaps because of the hypertrophy of canal walls (figs. 9, 11).
We have since identified carotid foramina in all sparassodont taxa that we were able to examine, and indeed its position in this group has never been controversial, with a few exceptions. For example, Patterson (1965; followed by Marshall, 1976b, 1977b, 1978) claimed that the typical carotid foramen was missing in Cladosictis YPM 15705. Instead, he identified a “posterior carotid foramen,” which, he conjectured, accommodated a branch destined for the circulus arteriosus (see also Basijugular sulcus and inferior petrosal sinus). The basis for his inference stemmed from a dissection of a fresh specimen of Didelphis marsupialis, in which he found a “small branch leaving the internal carotid artery at the level of the foramen lacerum posterius [= jugular foramen], passing into the cranial cavity through the posterior carotid foramen and there joining the circle of Willis” (Patterson, 1965: 6). The misidentification of the basicranial aperture of the inferior petrosal sinus as a “posterior carotid foramen” in marsupials goes back at least as far as a note in Gregory's (1910) monograph, because at that time it was widely accepted that two internal carotids, a medial and a lateral, had primitively existed in mammals. At that time there were few comparative data on cephalic veins apart from the internal jugular, and it was assumed that the large port near the jugular foramen must have been for a major artery. This hypothesis has been conclusively refuted on comparative anatomical grounds: there is only one internal carotid in mammals (Presley, 1979; Cartmill and MacPhee, 1980; Wible, 1983). Wible (1984) allowed that Patterson might have seen an unusual anastomosis between the circulus arteriosus and a small branch given off at the carotid furcation, possibly homologous with the ascending pharyngeal artery, but he did not consider it likely.
We have two additional observations to add to Wible's. First, although foraminal positions in Cladosictis skulls are often difficult to recognize because of damage or obscuring matrix, in at least a few examples (e.g., MPM 4323, MACN-A 5927, MLP 11-58) the carotid foramen is located precisely where one would expect, that is, along the track of the carotid sulcus rostral to the basioccipital-basisphenoidal synchondrosis (see Discussion). Second, we were unable to identify any arterial vessels within the confines of the channel for the inferior petrosal sinus in serially sectioned pouch young of Monodelphis and Perameles (figs. 24, 25). This suggests that the distribution of Patterson's vessel among extant marsupials, if it exists, is restricted taxonomically.
A similar case occurs in the evaluation of the cranial vasculature of Lycopsis (Marshall, 1977b). Marshall assumed that the internal carotid released a branch within the neck that separately joined the circulus arteriosus via the “bilobate” foramen lacerum posterius (= jugular foramen). Like Patterson, Marshall (1976b, 1978) failed to recognize the inferior petrosal sinus, apparently universally present in marsupials.
A final relevant example is Petter and Hoffstetter's (1983: fig. 4) failure to illustrate or discuss the carotid foramen of Paraborhyaena MNHN SAL 5, leaving it uncertain whether or not this taxon possessed this feature at all. However, they did note that a foramen, “qui apparaît … à faible distance en avant du bord postérieur de l'alisphénoïde, est interprété comme le foramen d'un canal transverse” [“which appears a sight distance in front of the posterior margin of the alisphenoid, is interpreted as the foramen of a transverse canal”] . As depicted by them, this foramen is relatively large compared to the transverse foramina of other sparassodonts, and its position is much more consistent with its being the carotid foramen. The transverse foramen, by contrast, is a variable feature in this group and its absence in Paraborhyaena would not be especially remarkable.
Sphenoorbital fissure and foramen rotundum: Turnbull and Segall (1984) thought that the apertures near the front end of the badly eroded skull of the Thylacosmilus paratype (figs. 4B, 9) were the optic canals. Scans show that they are instead the remnants of the sphenoorbital fissures (= optic-sphenorbital fissure of Muizon et al., 2018, and optic-orbital foramen of Marshall and Muizon, 1995; Muizon, 1998), which in metatherians transmit not only CN II but also CN III, IV, V1 and VI, plus the ophthalmic artery and vein. Immediately caudolateral to the sphenoorbital fissure is the foramen rotundum, which transmits CN V2 (figs. 4B, 9). The foramen rotundum is bilaterally exposed in this specimen because erosion had removed much of the rostral portion of the cranium. A separate foramen rotundum for CN V2 is the usual case in marsupials (see Voss and Jansa, 2009), and it was present in all sparassodonts examined in which the relevant area was preserved. The sphenoorbital fissure and foramen rotundum are not visible in ventral aspect in the holotype of Thylacosmilus because these apertures are hidden by a projecting shelf related to the pterygoids.
?Foramen spinosum: How the stem of the middle meningeal artery was supplied in sparassodonts is uncertain. Since the proximal stapedial is evidently absent in all adult metatherians (Wible, 1990; Wible and Hopson, 1995; Marshall et al., 1995), including sparassodonts, it is reasonable to infer that the meningeal distribution area of the embryonic stapedial ramus superior would have been pirated by other trunks—a frequent occurrence in mammals (Wible, 1987). In the holotype and MMP 1443-M the lateral margin of the foramen ovale bears a small aperture that cannot be attributed to any of the structures that typically pass through or near the glaserian fissure in mammals (chorda tympani, stapedial ramus inferior, lesser petrosal nerve, goniale) (figs. 6, 7A, 11). A comparable aperture could not be discriminated in the segmental data for the paratype, indicating that it may be inconstant. One plausible interpretation of the aperture's function is that it was the equivalent of the foramen spinosum of Homo—that is, it transmitted an anastomotic link (ramus anastomoticus) between the middle meningeal and maxillary artery.
Such a link has not been previously identified in metatherians, but its presence would not necessarily be surprising. In therians in which the proximal stapedial artery involutes, the ramus superior and its meningeal area of supply is typically taken over by the maxillary division of the external carotid (Bugge, 1974) or by the arteria diploetica magna (Wible, 1984). Other connections may also occur, although with less frequency (Bugge, 1974). Wible (1984) has shown that in some extant marsupials, the connection between the external carotid and meningeal supply occurs via the postglenoid artery (e.g., Wallabia rufogrisea). Further, in a pouch specimen of Peramales nasuta he detected a branch of the maxillary artery that passed through foramen ovale and terminated in the vicinity of the trigeminal ganglion. Although there are no other published observations of this latter vessel in a marsupial, the fact that it terminated morphologically shortly after entering the floor of the cranial cavity is consistent with its supplying tissues in the immediate area, including local meninges. Absence of a separate foramen spinosum occasionally occurs as an anomaly in humans; in such cases the stem of the artery presumably passes through foramen ovale (Standring, 2016). Assuming that this train of inference is correct, then individual variation would have to be invoked to explain the apparent absence of an independent foramen in the paratype. An equivalent to the foramen spinosum was not found in skulls of other sparassodonts available for study.
Transverse canal: No canal for the transverse venous sinus is evident in the holotype, paratype, or MMP 1443-M, which agrees with Riggs' (1934) similar observation. Among sparassodonts, the transverse canal has been reported as present in some taxa (e.g., Prothylacynus, Forasiepi, 2009; Lycopsis, Marshall, 1977b), but absent in others (e.g., Borhyaena, Sinclair, 1906).
Marshall (1977b) identified what he took to be a “remnant of the carotid canal” on the margin of foramen ovale in Lycopsis UCMP 38061, as well as a separate “foramen lacerum medium” 13 mm rostromedial to the former. If correctly described, his “carotid canal” on the lip of foramen ovale occurs in other taxa (e.g., Arctodictis, Forasiepi, 2009; Didelphis AMNH M 95350), but in these metatherians there is also a definite carotid canal in the usual place on the lateral aspect of the basisphenoid. A “rudimentary transverse canal” is mentioned as lying between these apertures in his text, but it is not identified as such in his figure 3. As in the case of Paraborhyaena, according to its position and relations Marshall's (1977b) transverse canal is much better interpreted as the true carotid foramen. Finally, Marshall's (1977b: fig. 3C) “foramen lacerum anterium,” positioned adjacent to the rostroventral surface of the petrosal, is the piriform fenestra of this paper.
Pterygoid canal: In mammals, blood vessels, nerves, and other elements traveling through the pharyngeal area are forced by space constraints to run in close association. Depending on position and taxon, these associations may include the internal carotid artery and vein(s), artery of the pterygoid canal, deep and greater petrosal nerves, tubal cartilage, and tensor tympani. In marsupials, the passageway for these bundles is often signaled by a prominent set of parallel grooves on the central stem, usually referred to as the carotid sulcus after the largest member of the group. The deep and greater petrosal nerves quickly diverge from other structures to travel thereafter within or along the pterygoid/basisphenoid suture as the nerve of the pterygoid canal, sometimes in company with the similarly named artery (MacPhee, 1981; Wible, 2003). However, these structures are small and related features can be difficult to identify (cf. Monodelphis; fig. 17). For example, a caudal aperture for the pterygoid canal could not be identified in the holotype or paratype of Thylacosmilus, either externally or in scans. Possibly the carotid canal conducted the nerve of the pterygoid canal partway toward its morphological termination in the sphenopalatine ganglion, but breakage obscures its precise routing.
In Sipalocyon AMNH VP 9254 (fig. 14) the carotid canal occupies its usual place, with a large sulcus leading into it. There is, however, a second sulcus, also large, adjacent and parallel to the first, which continues rostrally. Its track resembles that expected for the nerve of the pterygoid canal, although its size suggests it conducted a vessel as well (artery of pterygoid canal, or a large vein?). In other sparassodonts this second sulcus is not in evidence, although this area tends to be poorly preserved in fossils.
Glaserian fissure: As Turnbull and Segall (1984) noted, the glaserian (= tympanosquamosal) fissure in Thylacosmilus appears as a lengthy slit between the postglenoid process of the squamosal and the rostral wall of the bulla, which is also squamosal in origin (fig. 7A). This happens because the ectotympanic is aphaneric in Thylacosmilus and therefore does not appear in the bullar wall. Normally, the chorda tympani and related structures escape the middle ear between the rostral crus of the ectotympanic and the squamosal (see Tympanic Floor Composition in Comparative Set).
Foramen ovale: Riggs (1934: fig. 1) inverted the leaders identifying foramen ovale and carotid foramen in the illustration of the paratype of Thylacosmilus; his foramen caroticum is actually foramen ovale, and conversely. The foramen ovale appears to lie wholly within the alisphenoid and is essentially coplanar with the rest of the basicranium. It does not form the kind of short, anterolaterally directed canal formed by outgrowths of the alisphenoid tympanic process (= anteromedial bullar lamina; Pavan and Voss, 2016) seen in some marsupials (e.g., Didelphis), and whose exit from the skull base is sometimes distinguished as the secondary foramen ovale. (See Gaudin et al., 1996; Voss and Jansa, 2003, 2009, for additional remarks on this latter feature.)
In undamaged hathliacynid material, the foramen ovale lies entirely within the alisphenoid (e.g., Cladosictis. Sipalocyon. Notogale. Acyon; see Muizon, 1999; Forasiepi et al., 2006; Forasiepi, 2009), enclosed by outgrowths from the alisphenoid tympanic process, and thus interpreted as the secondary foramen ovale. Borhyaenids (Borhyaena. Arctodictis) and proborhyaenids (Callistoe) differ in that the foramen is simply a notch (incisura ovalis) that opens into the piriform fenestra between the alisphenoid and the petrosal (and not the ectotympanic; contra Sinclair, 1906: 349). The stem borhyaenid Prothylacynus differs slightly in that the foramen ovale opens within the alisphenoid (fig. 15). For completeness we note that there is a rod of bone defining, or at least circumscribing, a bony foramen ovale. The rod does not, however, qualify as a component of the alisphenoid tympanic process (such as the anteromedial bullar lamina) because it does not participate in bounding the middle ear cavity (fig. 15) and thus we do not distinguish the aperture as a secondary foramen ovale.
In Monodelphis, the foramen ovale and the piriform fenestra are confluent (fig. 17; cf. Wible, 2003). Also, large veins, presumably homologous with the emissary plexus of the foramen ovale found in Homo (Mortazavi et al., 2012), pass through this joint aperture and drain to the maxillary vein (fig. 24A, B). Although there are no morphological indicators of the presence of this plexus in Thylacosmilus, the foramen ovale is probably a frequent port for cephalic drainage in metatherians (cf. Archer, 1976), just as it is known to be in the few extant eutherians (e.g., horse; Ellenberger and Baum, 1894; Sisson and Grossman, 1953).
In sum, in the therian embryo, the potential space between the ala temporalis and the auditory capsule is eventually subdivided by the growth of sheets of bone, principally the alisphenoid but also the petrosal and sometimes the squamosal (see fig. 27). Typically, gaps of various sizes remain; smaller ones by convention are named foramina, but there is often a relatively large dehiscence that may persist into the adult stage between the petrosal and alisphenoid. If there is little ossification of this part of the tympanic roof, as in extant perissodactyls, some afrosoricoids, and many lipotyphlans (MacPhee, 1981), the mandibular branch of the trigeminal nerve (CN V3), greater petrosal nerve (part of CN VII), internal carotid and veins (if present; see Discussion) may pass through membrane rather than separate, bony foramina. Whether the mandibular nerve passes through a “complete” or “incomplete” bony foramen ovale will depend on the competitive growth rates of the leading edges of the alisphenoid and petrosal.
Canal x: A small aperture opens on the rostral lip of the left foramen ovale in the holotype, but it is absent on the right side. A similarly located and variable feature was detected by Muizon (1999) in Notogale MNHN SAL 271 and by Forasiepi (2009) in Borhyaena MACN-A 5922 and Arctodictis MLP 85-VII-3-1. Marshall (1977b) mentioned (but did not illustrate) the existence of a tiny hole in approximately the same position in Lycopsis UCMP 38061 (see Transverse canal) and we have seen it in Didelphis AMNH M 95350 as well. We identify it here as canal x.
In the case of Notogale, Muizon (1999: 490) called this feature the “lateral opening of the canal entovale,” and described it as a conduit between the carotid canal and foramen ovale. He thought that a small branch of the internal carotid might have passed along it. Although this possibility cannot be discounted, we regard it as unlikely. It cannot be the artery of the pterygoid canal, since canal x is directed away from, rather than toward, the position of the pterygopalatine ganglion. It is more probable that this channel transmitted a vein, the likeliest candidate for which is the sphenoidal (or Vesalian) emissary vein. In Homo, this vessel passes through an inconstant foramen (canaliculus sphenoidalis) on the medial side of the foramen ovale, to connect the cavernous sinus with the pterygoid plexus at the base of the skull (Mortazavi et al., 2012). It is likely present in many other mammals.
Sulcus and aperture for auditory tube: Turnbull and Segall (1984: 262) identified on the paratype a “depressed area on the caudomedial side of the squamosal and the medial side of the [ecto]tympanic” as the probable site of the auditory tube's passage toward the middle ear. This description appears to apply to a small groove on the ventral surface of the basicranium that lies in advance of the carotid foramen and is directed toward the rostromedial quadrant of the bulla (figs. 6, 9). Although features like this one are frequently attributed to the passage of the auditory tube, as an endothelial pharyngeal structure the tube is unlikely to leave a bony impression. The cartilage associated with the tube is a better candidate, but that structure is formed in most living marsupials by dense connective tissue (e.g., Maier et al., 1996). In a few known examples (e.g., Tarsipes and Dromiciops) cartilaginous or precartilagenous tissue is in fact present (see Aplin, 1990; Sánchez-Villagra, 1998; Sánchez-Villagra and Forasiepi, 2017, and references herein; see also fig. 24). For the most part, any sulci grooving bones immediately rostromedial to the auditory region are much more likely to relate to vascular structures and nerves, but since we cannot offer a definitive explanation for the function of this particular feature in Thylacosmilus, we simply designate it as “?sulcus for auditory tube” (?sat).
Postglenoid foramen and suprameatal foramen: In a table comparing Thylacosmilus to several Santacrucian borhyaenids, Riggs (1934: 29) stated that there was a foramen in the former that “perforates the squamosal within the external acoustic meatus, external foramen not in evidence.” He contrasted this with the condition in Santacrucian taxa in which a “large vascular foramen perforates the squamosal above the opening of auditory meatus,” a feature lacking in Thylacosmilus. These statements refer to two different vascular structures, although the two are related as venous sinuses. The postglenoid foramen is clearly present as an elongated canal in all specimens of Thylacosmilus (e.g., fig. 9). Contra Riggs (1934), its outlet is situated within the confines of the meatus. The suprameatal foramen (= subsquamosal foramen sensu Archer, 1976; Pavan and Voss, 2016) is situated in the roof of the meatus as defined by the suprameatal crest in Didelphis, Monodelphis, and many other marsupials. It carries a temporal branch of the postglenoid artery and vein to the temporal fossa (for discussion of homologies, see Wible, 2003). Although, as Riggs (1934) noted, Thylacosmilus lacks a suprameatal foramen, this aperture's functional role would presumably have been taken up by one of the canals for rami temporales (figs. 3–5). Thus, the ramus canal identified in figure 8C, D communicates with both the endocranium and the postglenoid foramen, implying that meningeal venous return would have joined with that from the sphenoparietal emissary vein (= postglenoid vein) (Wible, 2003; see also fig 25A, B). This arrangement is also seen in well-studied placentals (e.g., horse; Ellenberger and Baum, 1894), and it may well be a therian plesiomorphy.
Primary and secondary jugular foramen: A remarkable feature of the basicranium of Thylacosmilus is that the primary jugular foramen—the aperture through which the internal jugular vein and several cranial nerves (CN IX, X, and XI) depart the endocranium for the upper neck—is not externally visible. The jugular foramen, as seen on the medial aspect of the bulla, is actually secondary; after leaving the primary foramen the neurovascular bundle had to then pass through the medial bullar wall in order to depart the skull (fig. 8D). This extended routing was presumably a consequence of the greatly expanded exoccipital tympanic process growing over structures, such as the petrooccipital suture, that would normally lie outside the middle ear. Other sparassodonts, which lack a complex bulla, do not express a secondary jugular foramen like that of Thylacosmilus (e.g., Sipalocyon. Cladosictis. Prothylacynus; figs. 14, 15). The relatively small width of the jugular passageway has implications for venous drainage in Thylacosmilus and possibly other sparassodonts (see Basijugular sulcus and Inferior petrosal sinus).
Stylomastoid foramen and septum for facial nerve: The stylomastoid foramen is situated relatively caudoventrally, at the level of the ventral border of the external acoustic meatus and caudal to the level of the posttympanic process (fig. 6). How the hyoid apparatus articulated with the basicranium is unclear because there is no pit marking the location of the tympanohyal articulation.
On the dissected right side of the paratype, a low septum protrudes from the internal bullar wall opposite the position of the stylomastoid foramen. Originally this would have been continuous with the partial septum on the petrosal (fig. 9C: sfn), which conducted the facial nerve from the secondary facial foramen. The septum is presumably a pneumatization-related feature, and thus is absent in other sparassodonts with less inflated or nonexistent bullae. In Thylacosmilus, the septum for the facial nerve serves to morphologically separate the caudal and lateral paratympanic spaces.
Hypoglossal foramina (rostral and caudal): Based on comparisons with living marsupials (e.g., Archer, 1976; Wible, 1990, 2003), we infer that the two large apertures located immediately rostral to the occipital condyles in Thylacosmilus carried separate portions of the hypoglossal nerve (fig. 9B, C). These ports were identified as “precondylar foramina” by Riggs (1934) and Turnbull and Segall (1984). In light of our reconstruction of venous networks in this part of the caudal cranium (see Basijugular sulcus and inferior petrosal sinus), we infer that they also carried emissary veins, evidently of large size.
In Homo, the fibers forming CN XII pass through the single hypoglossal foramen as two semidiscrete, dura-lined bundles, which then rejoin in the upper neck to form a single trunk. These bundles are occasionally separated by a narrow spicule of bone within the foramen, but completely separate foramina are rare in humans (Standring, 2016) and probably most other placentals. By contrast, metatherians commonly display two foramina, which are sometimes differentiated as condyloid rather than hypoglossal foramina (or as “hypoglossal and accessory foramina”; Sinclair, 1906). Wible (2003) mentioned that in sectioned specimens of Monodelphis. Dasyurus, and Didelphis, these foramina regularly transmit separate bundles of hypoglossal fibers, thus confirming their suspected function. These ports are here distinguished as rostral and caudal hypoglossal foramina. We confirm by means of sectioned fetuses that the same dual bundle-foramina arrangement occurs also in Dromiciops (Sánchez-Villagra and Forasiepi, 2017) and Perameles (fig. 25C, D) . Since this configuration frequently occurs in extant marsupials, it is reasonable to assume that nonmarsupial metatherians varied in the same way. Hondadelphys, hathliacynids, and some borhyaenoids (e.g., Prothylacynus and Lycopsis: figs. 15, 26B), have a single hypoglossal foramen, whereas two foramina are found in Pucadelphys. Mayulestes, Borhyaenidae, Paraborhyaena, and Thylacosmilus (Marshall and Muizon, 1995; Muizon, 1998; Horovitz and Sánchez-Villagra, 2003; Babot, 2005; this paper). In the case of Paraborhyaena, Petter and Hofstetter (1983) interpreted the more caudal and larger aperture as the condylar foramen and the other, smaller one as the hypoglossal foramen. In line with our treatment of these features, we regard both apertures as properly hypoglossal in nature (that is, they each transmitted components of CN XII). Outgroups (e.g., Asioryctes, lipotyphlans; Kielan-Jaworowska, 1981; Novacek, 1986) have but one hypoglossal foramen, whereas more distant relatives (e.g., Vincelestes; Rougier, 1993) exhibit multiple openings whose contents cannot be resolved through comparative morphology.
Apart from the hypoglossal foramina, what can be interpreted as a true condyloid foramen for a condyloid vein occasionally occurs in extant marsupials (Wible, 2003; fig. 25D). We identified such a foramen in a few cases in which it seemed the most plausible interpretation (e.g., foramen intersecting the basijugular sulcus; fig. 15). When a separate venous aperture is not present, the vein presumably leaves the endocranium jointly with the hypoglossal nerve.
Basijugular sulcus and inferior petrosal sinus: In many and perhaps most sparassodonts (e.g., Thylacosmilus. Sipalocyon. Cladosictis. Borhyaena; figs. 6, 9, 14–16, 26A), there is a deep groove on the caudal aspect of the basicranium, here termed the basijugular sulcus. It is easily the largest such excavation on the basicranium, yet it has rarely been mentioned in the literature (but see Forasiepi, 2006). Similar sulci are also seen in some extant marsupials (e.g., Sarcophilus; fig. 18). The channel's relations indicate that it conducted a vessel of considerable size from the inferior petrosal sinus to the atlantooccipital articulation via the foramen magnum. Riggs (1934: 15) may have thought that it conducted an artery, since he referred to the caudal aperture of the inferior petrosal sinus as the “posterior carotid foramen,” but the sulcus is substantially wider than the true carotid canal in Thylacosmilus or carotid sulcus of other sparassodonts. Given its connection with the inferior petrosal sinus, this channel is much more likely to have been venous and is here identified as the craniovertebral vein (see Discussion).
In Thylacosmilus, smaller grooves related to the jugular and rostral hypoglossal foramina terminate within the basijugular sulcus, suggesting that all were linked together in a plexiform arrangement. The sulcus itself merges with the caudal hypoglossal foramen, reappearing on the exoccipital's endocranial surface with no diminution in width. The fact that the endocranial section of the sulcus leaves a noticeable trace, and is as large as its ectocranial portion, strongly suggests that this channel conducted a structure additional to the roots of CN XII. The sulcus continues caudally for a short distance, terminating on the lip of foramen magnum. From this and other evidence (see Discussion), we conclude that the sulcus and its various tributaries held branches of a major vascular network that was ancillary to the common routing of cerebral venous flow (i.e., sigmoid sinus–internal jugular–brachiocephalic–vena cava) seen in some but certainly not all placentals. The network in question appears to conform to the cerebrospinal venous system, extensively documented in human and veterinarian anatomies (e.g., Montané and Bourdelle, 1913; Reinhard et al., 1962; Evans and Christensen, 1979; Lang, 1983) but rarely discussed in the paleontological literature (cf. MacPhee, 1994). It is also consistent with the observation that, in monotremes and marsupials, major sigmoid drainage mainly occurs through the foramen magnum (Wible, 1984; see also Rougier and Wible, 2006).
Foramina for rami temporales and post-temporal canal: Rami temporales (MacPhee and Cartmill, 1986) can be thought of as continuations of meningeal branches (both arterial and venous) that penetrate the cranial vault, mostly in the parietal region. In some taxa, major vessels in the upper neck and nuchal region such as the occipital vasculature and the arteria/vena diploetica magna may also communicate with rami temporales. As rami are commonly present in both placentals and marsupials (Wible, 1984; Wible and Hopson, 1995), their existence in sparassodonts is to be expected (figs. 3–5, 8C). As it is usually impossible in fossil material to tell whether both arterial and venous channels passed through these foramina, we have assumed that both are always present (see also Postglenoid Foramen and Suprameatal Foramen).
There appears to be no evidence that the posttemporal canal (for arteria/vena diploetica magna) occurred in sparassodonts (Forasiepi, 2009). Although perforations are evident in the caudal aspect of the cranium of Thylacosmilus, the ones we were able to trace in scans were very short and evidently devoted to maintaining local bone tissue (figs. 8E, 10B: nf).
DISCUSSION
Major Osteological Features
The tympanic floor and roof of Thylacosmilus are morphologically complex, including no fewer than five elements whose outgrowths participate in their formation (squamosal, alisphenoid, and exoccipital, with petrosal and ectotympanic as constant members). This complexity should not, however, be overemphasized, because the actual shape of roof and floor components is largely the result of intense pneumatization of the middle ear's bony walls. It is the process of pneumatization—involving highly coordinated osteoblastic and osteoclastic activity operating on opposite sides of growing bony elements during ontogeny (MacPhee, 1981)—that determines overall architecture, not the individual bones somehow developing outgrowths in isolation from one another.
The most obvious basicranial difference between Thylacosmilus and its relatives within Borhyaenoidea (e.g., Prothylacynus and Borhyaena; figs. 15, 16) is the apparent lack of a considerable bony floor of the tympanic cavity, other than that provided by the ectotympanic. The tympanic floor was more ossified in hathliacynids, but none approach Thylacosmilus in bullar size or completeness. The ectotympanic had to have been present in all sparassodonts, but with the exception of Thylacosmilus (this contribution) and Paraborhyaena MNHN SAL 5, in which an expanded ectotympanic was described (Petter and Hoffstetter, 1983), no borhyaenoid skull has been recovered with this element in place. This probably indicates it was very lightly attached to the walls of the external acoustic meatus.
Another remarkable character of Thylacosmilus, borhyaenids (e.g., Australohyaena; Forasiepi et al., 2015), and at least some proborhyaenids (e.g., Paraborhyaena and Callistoe; Petter and Hoffstetter 1983; Muizon 1999; Babot et al., 2002; Muizon et al., 2018), is reorientation of the auditory capsule (long axis at right angle to the horizontal). The functional correlations of this rearrangement are unknown.
As emphasized throughout this paper, there is no unique pattern of tympanic floor and roof composition in sparassodonts. Coverage varies from complete absence of floor components other than the ectotympanic (e.g., Borhyaena. Prothylacynus) to ones in which the tympanic cavity was increasingly encased in bone (e.g., Thylacosmilus).
Major Vascular Features
The position and relations of most of the large vessels leaving interpretable impressions on the sparassodont basicranium, such as the internal carotid and sphenoparietal emissary vein (Wible, 2003), are not controversial. Also reasonably well documented, and generally applicable to other sparassodonts, are the anatomical correlates of the internal carotid and the absence of a functional arteria diploetica magna. By contrast, the organization of the cerebrospinal venous system, as inferred for Thylacosmilus as well as other sparassodonts, has not previously been recognized and is given extended treatment below. We also provide an explanation, founded in comparative craniogenesis, for the notable invariance of the location of the carotid foramen in metatherians (e.g., Sánchez-Villagra and Forasiepi, 2017).
Cerebrospinal Venous System in Thylacosmilus and Other Sparassodonts
The morphological correlates of the basijugular sulcus suggest that it bore an important constituent of the cerebrospinal (or vertebral plexus) venous system. The relations of this system are well understood in Homo but have been investigated in few other mammals except ones having economic or social importance, such as Canis. This and other pathways considered as atypical (from the standpoint of human anatomy) are generally grouped as “collateral channels,” but their fundamental components doubtless exist in most mammalian taxa, where they may be of greater significance than in Homo (cf. MacPhee, 1994).
In Canis, the cerebrospinal venous system consists of a highly plexiform set of valveless channels running from the head to the sacrum, along the vertebrae and within the vertebral canal (Nathoo et al., 2011). The system's rostral end receives venous flow from the cerebral sinuses at the base of the brain (cavernous sinus, petrosal sinuses, basilar plexus), transmitting it to plexuses ringing the foramen magnum and rostral part of the vertebral column. These plexuses anastomose with the azygos vein, various segmental components (e.g., intercostal veins), as well as with each other, ultimately feeding into major collectors like the brachiocephalic veins and rostral vena cava. As noted below, there is some indication that in sparassodonts the cerebrospinal venous system may have actually functioned as the dominant route for returning cerebral blood to the heart, with the internal jugular vein playing a subsidiary role. It is primitive for therians to send the major portion of endocranial venous return through the foramen magnum (Wible, 1984).
In simplified portrayals of cephalic venous return in mammals, the inferior petrosal sinus is depicted as an exclusive tributary of the sigmoid sinus/internal jugular vein. This is misleading, as the inferior petrosal sinus, like the other cerebral sinuses, is significantly plexiform (Mortazavi et al., 2012). For present purposes, the most important of these connections involve the condyloid emissary vein(s) and vertebral plexuses. In Homo these are usually small in caliber (Lang, 1983; Mortazavi et al., 2012; Standring, 2016), but in some mammals they are major channels. In Canis the inferior petrosal sinus does not terminate anatomically in the internal jugular vein, as in humans, but instead continues caudally to join the condyloid veins. Thus formed, these veins pass through the condyloid canals to the inner surface of the exoccipital, where as “the ultimate cranial extensions of the longitudinal venous sinuses” (Reinhard et al., 1962: 70) they become continuous with the basilar and vertebral plexuses (see also Evans and Christensen, 1979: 122, figs. 4–10; 794, figs. 12–21, 22).
In Evans and Christensen's (1979) nomenclature this continuation of the inferior petrosal sinus is identified as the vertebral vein. From the standpoint of harmonizing human with nonhuman anatomy this usage is somewhat confusing, because the vertebral vein of Homo is defined as the trunk that arises from the coalescence of distal branches of the vertebral plexus in the cervical region, well away from the foramen magnum. For this reason we prefer to label the continuation of the inferior petrosal sinus through the basijugular sulcus into the endocranium as the craniovertebral vein (fig. 26A). Since the vertebral vein of Canis and the greatly expanded craniovertebral vein inferred for sparassodonts have apparently similar relations, there is a case to be made for considering them as homologs. However, since the incidence of this pathway is so poorly documented for the vast majority of mammals, at present we recommend restricting usage of “craniovertebral vein” to Sparassodonta and, arguably, other metatherians.
As noted, although there is a functional internal jugular in the dog, it is a relatively small vessel (“almost vestigial” according to Reinhard et al., 1962: 72), indicating that a significant part of venous return from the endocranium is actually carried by the inferior petrosal sinus to the vertebral plexus via the condyloid vein. The question arises whether in sparassodonts the cerebrospinal venous system was likewise dominant over the internal jugular. To test this idea, we measured the jugular canal and basijugular sulcus in the Thylacosmilus holotype. The size of the intrabullar canal linking the primary and secondary jugular foramina should provide some indication of the size of the internal jugular vein at its anatomical origin (fig. 8D: jfis). Because in life this canal also gave passage to several nerves, our jugular measurement presumably overestimates the vein's actual caliber. Scaled scan segments through the relevant region of the holotype of Thylacosmilus indicate that the minimum width of its jugular canal is approximately 2 mm. In comparison, the width of the basijugular sulcus in the same specimen is 7 mm.
Another indication of the absolute size of the inferior petrosal sinus/craniovertebral vein can be gained from conditions in Borhyaena (MACN-A 5922; fig. 16C). In this specimen, postmortem loss of the petrosals has fortuitously exposed a deep, continuous groove on the exposed lateral margins of the central stem, from the area of the carotid canal/cavernous sinus rostrally to the level of the beginning of the basijugular sulcus caudally. Given that the groove passes directly into the sulcus, it is reasonably certain that it contained the inferior petrosal sinus. Because the jugular foramen is ill defined in this taxon (fig. 16), its dimensions cannot be directly compared to those of the basijugular sulcus. However, it is instructive to note the size difference between the sulcus and the more rostrally positioned carotid canal, also visible in figure 16B. Clearly, the inferior petrosal sinus and its continuation, the craniovertebral vein, were major cranial vessels in this taxon.
In summary, this hypothesis concerning the method of cranial venous return in sparassodonts should be considered tentative. Although additional verification is needed, the size of the basijugular sulcus suggests that it was part of a major system of venous return in sparassodonts.
Carotid Foramen Position In Marsupials and Placentals
This study has emphasized the remarkable consistency marsupials display in regard to the presence and location of the carotid canal, in contrast to placentals in which the canal is much more variable. Such consistency requires explanation; here we suggest that it may be correlated with certain features of early cranial development. This treatment is based on ideas originally developed by De Beer (1929, 1937) and Starck (1967) concerning carotid foramen development in tetrapods, but we now extend them explicitly to conditions in marsupials.
In marsupials the endocranial aperture of the carotid foramen—that is, the aperture adjacent to the hypophysis through which the internal carotid artery actually enters the endocranium—varies little in regard to its relative position and relations. In contrast, the foramen's exocranial aperture may be significantly displaced due to postnatal patterns of basicranial growth (Sánchez-Villagra and Forasiepi, 2017). Although many factors are probably involved, ontogenetic events occurring early in cranial development seem to play a possibly fundamental role in carotid foramen positioning.
In late fetal stages of therians, the central stem is usually a solid bar of cartilage, but morphologically it derives from several separate chondrifications (lamina trabecularis, polar cartilages, and hypophyseal and basal plates) that appear early in craniogenesis and later fuse (De Beer, 1937). An important generalization is that in most investigated placentals these chondrifications initially differentiate medial to the internal carotid arteries without enveloping them (De Beer, 1929, 1937; Lepus, fig. 27A). Later, a transitory cartilaginous arch develops lateral to the internal carotid at its point of entry into the endocranium. This is the alicochlear commissure that, as its name implies, joins the ala temporalis (an outgrowth of the lamina trabecularis) to the anterior pole of the otic capsule adjacent to the future basioccipital-basisphenoidal synchondrosis. The result is that the artery is now enclosed within a chondrocranial aperture that is immediately adjacent to, but not morphologically within, the central stem. There are exceptions: the alicochlear commissure does not form in lorises, for example, but, interestingly, in these primates the internal carotid is involuted and functionally replaced by an ascending pharyngeal/circulus arteriosus anastomosis (Cartmill, 1975; MacPhee, 1981).
In early fetuses of marsupials, by contrast, the fused lamina trabecularis/hypophyseal plate, which forms the anlage of the basisphenoid, expands laterally to a relatively greater extent than in developing placentals. This may be a reflection of the need to precociously form hard structures in the pharyngeal area in order to facilitate efficient suckling (Maier, 1993). In any case, the result is that the internal carotid, at its point of entry into the endocranium, is surrounded by cartilage from an early stage (Perameles; fig. 27B). The alicochlear commissure never develops as a recognizable morphological entity in marsupials (De Beer, 1937; Maier, 1987), although whether its independent existence is suppressed or overtaken by heterochronic expansion of the central stem is uncertain. Alternatively, this form of carotid foramen development may simply be plesiomorphic for mammals, as monotremes follow a similar sequence (De Beer and Fell, 1936).
Although these differences appear minor, they determine later morphology. When the ossification center for the basisphenoid bone appears within the marsupial central stem, it rapidly envelops the internal carotid, thus permanently fixing its position (Monodelphis. Macropus; fig. 27C, D). Thereafter, the relative position of the osteocranial carotid foramen on the skull will be determined by the local synchondrosal growth center. If relative growth on the basisphenoid side of the synchondrosis outstrips that on the basioccipital side, the foramen's position will appear to move relatively rostrally, as compared with a species in which the converse pattern of growth prevails. (Because the carotid foramen is fixed within basisphenoidal material, in the latter case the foramen's position adjacent to the synchondrosis will not appear to change significantly during later ontogeny; fig. 17).
In placentals, final conditions depend on the nature of skeletal maturation in the area of the piriform fenestra and fetal carotid foramen. In at least some placentals that have been studied for this purpose, such as the tenrec Hemicentetes semispinosus, the alicochlear commissure persists well into late fetal life, to be replaced subsequently by ossification proceeding from the basisphenoid (MacPhee, 1981: fig. 56; see also fig. 27E; asterisks). In this way the internal carotid's final position also becomes fixed with respect to surrounding bone territories and the synchondrosis, but in a way appreciably different from and ontogenetically later than the marsupial pattern. In most investigated placentals the alicochlear commissure involutes without ossifying (R.D.E.M., personal obs.), with the result that the presumptive (membrane-bounded) carotid foramen appears to be continuous with the rest of the unossified portion of the basicranium (i.e., piriform fenestra). With further growth and maturation, all or part of the fenestra will become “the” carotid foramen. By contrast, if ossification mostly proceeds from the petrosal, the foramen will appear to perforate that bone. If instead it is the basisphenoid that ossifies the area of the fenestra, the foramen will appear within the latter—but only late in ontogeny, a point De Beer (1937) did not appreciate in the case of Erinaceus (MacPhee, 1981: fig. 50), which to him seemed “primitive” (i.e., marsupiallike) in having a basisphenoid-bounded carotid foramen. Note that formation of lengthy carotid canals, something that occurs in many mammals, will not affect the point at which the internal carotid actually enters the endocranium, which as noted is always adjacent to the hypophysis in both marsupials and placentals.
In summary, the real differences between the two groups appear to be three:
(1) In marsupials, there is precocious entrapment of the internal carotid within the trabecular anlage in which the center for the basisphenoid appears, heterochronistically early compared to placental cranial ontogeny.
(2) In placentals, carotid enclosure also occurs, but through the agency of the alicochlear commissure, a laterally positioned structure that does not appear in marsupial development (De Beer, 1937), at least as a morphologically separate entity. In some cases the commissure is later replaced by bone, from the basisphenoid or petrosal (or often both), thus converting the cartilaginous carotid foramen into the bony successor seen in the adult. In other cases the commissure involutes without bony replacement, and the now-unenclosed carotid simply penetrates the membrane covering the piriform fenestra rather than traveling through its own aperture.
(3) In many marsupials the carotid foramen may elongate into a canal, due to later growth, but this does not affect relative relationships determined in the fetus. In placentals there is greater potential variety in the matrix of bones enclosing the internal carotid in the adult, but this too is the result of later growth patterns (such as in the precise way the piriform fenestra closes, if it does).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to William Simpson (FMHN), Alejandro Kramarz (MACN), Marcelo Reguero (MLP), Matías Taglioretti and Fernando Scaglia (MMP), Daniel Brinkman (YPM), and Ruth O'Leary and Judy Galkin (AMNH) for permitting access to collections under their care, and to Marcelo Sáchez-Villagra and Wolfang Maier for permitting access to histological serial sections of marsupial embryos. We thank Sergio F. Vizcaíno and Susana Bargo for granting access to sparassodont specimens from recent excavations in the Santa Cruz Formation (fieldwork financially supported by PICT 2013-389 to S.F. Vizcaíno). We also thank Zhe-Xi Luo (University of Chicago) for facilitating arrangements for scanning Thylacosmilus atrox (FMNH P14344), Larry Witmer for access to his CT scan of Thylacosmilus atrox FMNH P14531, and Camille Grohé for 3-D reconstructions of the inner ear of Sipalocyon (AMNH VP 9254) and Borhyaena (YPM PU 15120). We are grateful to the reviewers, Robin Beck and Russell Engelman, for their comments on the original manuscript, and to the editor Robert Voss for additional helpful observations. We thank Lorraine Meeker (AMNH) for her excellent photography and line art presented in this paper. We also thank Jorge L. Blanco for cover art and the life reconstruction in figure 2. Copyright for the photos of Cladosictis patagonica (YPM PU 15170) and Borhyaena tuberata (YPM PU 15120) belongs to the Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History. This is a contribution to projects financially supported by ANPCYT (PICT 2015-966) and the Fulbright-CONICET Scholar Program 2015–2016 (to A.M.F.).
REFERENCES
Appendices
APPENDIX 1
Glossary
To insure that our terminology is clear and consistent, where appropriate we utilize names and definitions in the glossary developed by MacPhee (1981), with additions from Wible (2003) and other sources . A few additional definitions and clarifications are needed to cover conditions found in Thylacosmilus and other fossil metatherians. A source of previous error in identifying apertures associated with the transit of the internal carotid artery through the basicranium may stem from an assumption that marsupials do not differ from placentals. In fact, they do differ.
Emissary veins: Transcranial valveless veins connect intracranial venous sinuses with the extracranial venous system, typically via a number of ports distributed over the neurocranium (Lang, 1983; Standring, 2016). Examples of emissary veins that may attain large caliber in specific taxa include the mastoid emissary vein and the emissary vein or plexus of foramen ovale, which attains large size in Monodelphis (R.D.E.M., personal obs.) and perhaps other marsupials.
Emissary veins represent an important class of vascular structures that are rarely considered in morphological studies of fossil mammals. In living taxa, they appear early in ontogeny as the primary channels draining the developing brain, only to later decline in significance as other venous networks take over (e.g., Padget, 1957). Several physiological functions have been attributed to emissary veins, including selective brain cooling due to the fact that blood can flow through them bidirectionally (Hoogland et al., 2012; O'Brien et al., 2016). Although emissary veins probably exist in adults of all mammals, their incidence is well documented only for Homo, some domestic animals, and certain species commonly used in physiological studies (e.g., O'Brien et al., 2016). In Homo emissary veins are almost always relatively small in caliber except where affected by pathology or developmental error (Falk, 1986; Chen et al., 2007; Mortazavi et al., 2012). In such contexts emissary veins may become important as alternative routes for venous return, if the network can adapt by successfully shunting the flow to these bypasses (Batson, 1940, 1957; Chen et al., 2007). What works in acute disease contexts can presumably also work in evolutionary contexts, given time and appropriate selective forces. This is suggested by instances in which emissaries retain their original importance throughout ontogeny, augmenting or even replacing other channels. A good example is the sphenoparietal emissary vein, which originates in relation to the prootic sinus of early ontogeny (Wible, 1990, 2003). In many mammals, but not normally in humans, this emissary is retained throughout life, acting as the intracranial portion of the retromandibular vein (= postglenoid vein) and draining via the postglenoid foramen to the temporal veins. A speculative effort to reconstruct some elements of cranial vasculature in Thylacosmilus is provided in figure 26A.
Entoglenoid region: As used here, the region of the squamosal immediately internal to the mandibular fossa. In many sparassodonts this region is notably elongated mediolaterally, and sometimes bears a depression for reception of the rostral crus of the ectotympanic.
Epitympanic wing: Any outgrowth of a basicranial bone that contributes to the roof of the tympanic cavity (as opposed to a tympanic process, which contributes to the floor of the tympanic cavity). To qualify, the outgrowth must be substantial, not a mere ridge. A useful guide in some but not all cases is the smooth rounding of bony surfaces caused by pneumatization, which tends to increase the volume of the middle ear and thus the number of bone territories that appear within it. In relation to Thylacosmilus, we identify epitympanic wings of the alisphenoid, squamosal, and petrosal (i.e., tegmen tympani). Although the tympanic process of the exoccipital is large and well defined, the epitympanic wing in this taxon is confined to the caudal paratympanic sinus and is not visible within the tympanic cavity as such. Although not defined as a (bony) epitympanic wing, from the standpoint of ontogeny, the membrane covering the piriform fenestra in life certainly qualifies as a roof constituent when incorporated into the middle ear.
Paratympanic space: Any significant pneumatic excavation within the confines of the middle ear but outside the bounds of the tympanic cavity proper. “Paratympanic,” as a term applied to secondary spaces (e.g., MacPhee and Cartmill, 1986), are extensions of the ontogenetically primary tympanic cavity, which may be positionally defined as the space that contains the principal organs of hearing (auditory ossicles, muscles, apertures of the cochlear and vestibular windows, and tympanic membrane; MacPhee, 1981). “Paratympanic space” is used here in preference to “hypotympanic sinus” (“the part of the tympanic cavity that contains none of its principal elements, including the auditory ossicles and the fenestrae in the periotic” [van der Klaauw, 1931: 19]). Strictly speaking, the hypotympanic sinus should lie beneath the tympanic cavity proper: “it is formed when the ventral wall loses its flatness and becomes inflated on the medial or caudal side” (van der Klaauw, 1931: 19). However, this term is often used to describe the whole volume circumjacent to the primary tympanic cavity containing the auditory ossicles. Here, paratympanic spaces are named positionally, relative to pars cochlearis. For Thylacosmilus we discriminate ventral, lateral, and caudal paratympanic spaces.
Piriform fenestra: Membrane-covered gap in the midbasicranial floor at the level of the basioccipital-basisphenoidal synchondrosis, situated between the alisphenoid/squamosal rostrally, cochlear part of the petrosal caudally, and central stem medially. If persistent, the fenestra appears in the adult as a defect in the basicranium. Its actual borders and appearance, however, vary widely as much depends on how (or whether) the area is ossified by surrounding bones (MacPhee, 1981; Sánchez-Villagra and Forasiepi, 2017). In developing placentals, the fenestra may be morphologically situated entirely within the tympanic cavity as defined by the bony bulla or the fibrous membrane of the tympanic cavity (MacPhee, 1981). In marsupials, the definitive middle ear often fails to incorporate the area of the fenestra, with the result that the gap lies partly or wholly outside the tympanic cavity proper (e.g., Thylacosmilus). This feature is sometimes referred to as the foramen lacerum medium in the marsupial literature, a usage we avoid here.
As development continues, basicranial elements may grow together, resulting in the disappearance of the piriform fenestra. However, if ossification is incomplete, the fenestra may act as a single joint aperture for the mandibular nerve (CN V3), greater petrosal nerve (part of CN VII), and accompanying vasculature (e.g., venous plexuses). It does not transmit the internal carotid artery in marsupials, although it may in placentals due to developmental differences (see Discussion). The degree of bony closure varies within species and it is surely ultimately controlled by developmental programming related to the skull base.
Tympanic cavity: The osseous, topologically unitary chamber that contains the cavum tympani, the membranous sac that fills this chamber during life (MacPhee, 1981). The middle ear includes the tympanic cavity plus the auditory tube and ossicles. Dilatations in the bony walls of the middle ear, variously named mastoid cavity, epitympanic sinus, hypotympanic sinus, paratympanic spaces, and so forth, are the result of highly specific bone remodeling during ontogeny, which explains why there is such uniformity in their relative positioning within, as opposed to between, taxa.
Tympanic process of alisphenoid: Substantial outgrowth of the caudal margin of the alisphenoid that bounds the rostral floor of the tympanic cavity. Found in many but not all metatherians.
Tympanic process of basisphenoid: Substantial outgrowth of lateral margin of the basisphenoid that helps to delimit the medial side of the floor of the tympanic cavity. Absent or not apparent (e.g., Thylacosmilus) in metatherians.
Tympanic process of exoccipital: (occasionally, and incorrectly, “mastoid” process) bounds the caudal part of the floor of the middle ear, caudal to the round window (e.g., Vombatus; van Kampen, 1905: 408). In Thylacosmilus the exoccipital process is hollowed out by a paratympanic space, which is evidence that it actually contributes to bounding the middle ear and is therefore correctly described as a tympanic process. This feature is not unique to this genus and also occurs in extant marsupials (e.g., wombats; Wegner, 1964). We do not use the terms paroccipital process (e.g., Muizon, 1999) or paracondylar process (e.g., Forasiepi 2009; Forasiepi et al., 2015) for this structure here, even though those terms are in frequent use in the marsupial literature, because these names are more appropriately used in relation to attachment sites for muscles (e.g., digastric muscle).
Tympanic processes of petrosal: These outgrowths are exhaustively treated by MacPhee (1981) and require only minimal definition here:
The rostral tympanic process of the petrosal arises from all or part of the ventral surface of pars cochlearis. May form a major portion of the bony tympanic floor in many marsupials (e.g., Dromiciops; Sánchez-Villagra and Wible, 2002).
The caudal tympanic process of the petrosal arises primarily from the rostroventral part of pars canalicularis (MacPhee, 1981) and bounds the rearmost portion of the tympanic cavity. Occasionally very large (e.g., Dromiciops; Sánchez-Villagra and Wible, 2002). Although “mastoid process” is often used in a similar sense in metatherian character analyses, we restrict usage of that term to nontympanic outgrowths of pars canalicularis appearing on the nuchal aspect of the skull (e.g., Didelphis).
Tympanic processes of squamosal: These processes arise from the squamosal's ventral margin. For metatherians, it is necessary to distinguish two such processes, rostral and caudal, between which the aperture of the external acoustic meatus intervenes. As in the case of the rostral and caudal tympanic processes of the petrosal, both are formed by a single bone and (when both are present) do not form a self-suture. Nevertheless, they can be adequately distinguished as follows (fig. 6A, C):
The rostral tympanic process of the squamosal (= entoglenoid process of squamosal sensu MacPhee, 1981; processus paratympanicus lateralis sensu Wegner, 1964) arises from the entoglenoid region of the squamosal and helps to frame the rostral wall of the tympanic cavity. In some marsupials (e.g., Vombatus. Lasiorhinus), it forms all of the bony rostral wall (Wegner, 1964), to the exclusion of the alisphenoid tympanic process.
The caudal tympanic process of the squamosal arises from the posttympanic region of the squamosal and frames (together with the caudal crus of the ectotympanic, if expanded, and, in some cases, the exoccipital tympanic process) the caudal wall of the tympanic cavity. We restrictively define the posttympanic process to the projection or ridge on the cranial sidewall that serves as an attachment point for hyoid musculature as seen in living mammals.