Translator Disclaimer
15 June 2021 Taxonomic implications of the original illustrations of Prosobonia from Tahiti and Moorea made during the second and third Cook expeditions
Justin J. F. J. Jansen, Pepijn Kamminga, Marc Argeloo
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Two extinct taxa, Moorea Sandpiper Prosobonia ellisi and Tahiti Sandpiper P. leucoptera, once occurred on Moorea and Tahiti, respectively. Four illustrations of Prosobonia from the second and third Cook expeditions (1772–75 and 1776–80) exist, of which one was the model for P. ellisi, whilst two others depict P. leucoptera and one Kiritimati Sandpiper P. cancellata. Considerable confusion exists as to whether P. ellisi is a valid species or an intraspecific variant of P. leucoptera. We examined the Tahiti / Moorea illustrations and original notes by crew of the Cook expeditions. We conclude that P. ellisi should be regarded as a junior synonym of P. leucoptera, as the differences between them may represent age-related, sexual, seasonal or even inter-island variation.

Four illustrations made by artists on the second (1772–75) and third (1776–80) Cook circumnavigations depict shorebirds referred to the genus Prosobonia (Scolopacidae), which is currently considered to comprise five species of very rare or extinct Polynesian endemics. The first was drawn by Johann Georg Adam Forster (1754–94) during Cook's second voyage, in either August 1773 or April–May 1774, when Tahiti was visited. It illustrates what is considered the type of Tahiti Sandpiper P. leucoptera (J. F. Gmelin 1789) (Sharpe 1906b, Hume 2017: 150–151). The second and third illustrations were made by William Wade Ellis and John Webber during Cook's third voyage. Both were made at Moorea (visited between 30 September and 11 October 1777) (cf. Walters 1991: 224, Hume 2017: 151), and much later the bird depicted in the Ellis drawing was described as Moorea Sandpiper P. ellisi (Sharpe 1906b). The fourth illustration was made at Kiritimati, during the third circumnavigation, and shows Kiritimati Sandpiper P. cancellata (J. F. Gmelin 1789) (Latham 1785: 274, Walters 1993, Jansen & Cibois 2020). The other two species were discovered after Cook's expeditions: Tuamotu P. parvirostris (Peale 1849) and Henderson Sandpipers P. sauli (De Pietri et al. 2020).

In addition to these illustrations, there are descriptions by Johann Reinhold Forster (Lichtenstein 1844: 174–176) and a brief description made by William Anderson (Anderson c.1780). As part of a wider study of the history of Naturalis specimen of P. leucoptera (Jansen et al. 2021), we examined these original illustrations and descriptions.

Material and Methods

JJFJJ studied the following material at the Natural History Museum, London, UK (NHMUK) and British Museum, London (BM): Forster's illustration (now held in the R. B. R. Forster collection, Banksian MSS. 6–7, pl. 117), Ellis's illustration (in the collection of William Wade Ellis, 1751–85, Banksian MS. 33, pl. 65) and Webber's illustration (among the John Webber prints, British Museum, Prints and Drawings Dept.), as well as the Solander catalogue (Solander c.1780), at NHMUK, Tring. This catalogue documents the illustrations in the library of Joseph Banks at the time (Whitehead 1978, Medway 1979), and a list of specimens compiled by Jonas Carlsson Dryander (Whitehead 1978, Medway 1979).

TABLE 1

Variation in original artwork executed during the second (1772–75) and third (1776–80) expeditions commanded by James Cook, and the description made during the second Cook circumnavigation by J. R. Forster. Only the relevant parts from the Forster description are noted (for the full description see Lichtenstein 1844).

img-z2-5_133.gif

Continued.

img-z3-2_133.gif

Review of original material

Two illustrations are of birds from Moorea and one from Tahiti. It is unknown if the illustration from Moorea depicts the same bird as that from Tahiti. To understand the morphological and anatomical differences in the illustrations we analysed the original Forster, Ellis and Webber illustrations, and the Forster description in Lichtenstein (1844: 174–176) (Table 1), but we excluded two c.1780 manuscripts.

Anderson.—In Anderson's (c.1780) manuscript describing animals observed on Captain Cook's second and third voyages, Charadrius tardus (Anderson's manuscript name) is mentioned with a short description (our translation): ‘Head/body black above, with a stripe above the eyes, a wing mark, the belly and the undertail white; the breast and rump reddish or brown.' It was mentioned alongside two other species of ‘Plover' (Hooded Plover Thinornis cucullatus from New Zealand and a ‘blackish plover' from Terra del Fuego (possibly Magellanic Plover Pluvianellus socialis). However, from the manuscript it is impossible to determine if the ‘Charadrius tardus’ was actually collected (contra Stresemann 1950: 76, Hume 2017: 151).

Solander.—Herein (Solander c.1780), Tahiti Sandpiper is mentioned as: ‘93 / 1 / Webber Ellis / (Te-te) / Otaheite Eimeo’ (Otaheite = Tahiti, Eimeo = Moorea).

Discussion and Conclusions

The three illustrations examined all differ (Table 1), and none exactly matches the sole surviving mount, RMNH.AVES.87556. The Webber illustration (drawn at Moorea) shows a bird very similar in appearance to the Prosobonia specimen at Naturalis (Jansen et al. 2021). The Ellis illustration, which is not quite finished (i.e. the nails are uncoloured), was used to describe the Moorea taxon. Sharpe (1906b) described Ellis' illustration as differing from that by Forster in having a circlet of rufous around the eye; a double patch of white on the wing-coverts, and the median and greater wing-coverts pale ferruginous, like the rump. However, the Webber illustration, also made on Moorea (Fig. 3), was not mentioned by Sharpe (1906a,b). According to Walters (1991), the Ellis (Fig. 2) and Webber (Fig. 3) depictions are of the same species. However, they differ in at least ten points: bill shape and thickness, ear patch colour, throat colour, tibia feathering, tail pattern, wing-coverts pattern, tail and wing lengths, and leg and underparts colorations. The Webber illustration differs in having a supercilium (absent in Ellis'), only a single patch of white on the wing-coverts (not two), and differently patterned median and greater coverts. The rump is ferruginous, but the same feature is present on the surviving specimen (Jansen et al. 2021).

Figure 1.

Tahiti Sandpiper Prosobonia leucoptera, Tahiti, August 1774 or April/May 1774; the bird shows at least two groups of white wing feathers (Georg Forster, © Natural History Museum, London)

img-z4-1_133.jpg

Figure 2.

Moorea Sandpiper Prosobonia ellisi, Moorea, August–December 1777; the claws are not coloured, indicating that the illustration was unfinished, and the annotation Prosobonia ellisi was added by Sawyer (Sawyer 1949) (William Wade Ellis, © Natural History Museum, London)

img-z5-1_133.jpg

At that time illustrators were less accurate, especially in details, than now; for example, virtually all depictions of Dodo Raphus cucullatus differ in some respects (Fuller 2002) as do known illustrations of the sole Tahiti Sandpiper specimen in Joseph Banks' collection (Figs. 46). It is very unlikely that birds from Moorea were morphologically distinct from those on Tahiti (as these islands are separated by just 18 km). Also, there is evidence of individuals exhibiting patchy white feathers in several Polynesian Acrocephalus warblers (Thibault & Cibois 2017), which could be evidence of a limited gene pool and explain the minor variation in the meagre sample of sandpipers.

Figure 3.

Moorea Sandpiper Prosobonia ellisi, Moorea, August–December 1777; anatomically incorrect (John Webber © British Museum, London)

img-z6-1_133.jpg

Figure 4.

Tahiti Sandpiper Prosobonia leucoptera, from Latham (1785); note the pale undertail-coverts and rufous supercilium (© Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC)

img-AhO_133.jpg

Figure 5.

Tahiti Sandpiper Prosobonia leucoptera, from Latham (1824); note the white supercilium, rufous wing-coverts, and pale belly and undertail-coverts (© University Library, Univ. of Illinois). Latham added a plate to his first publication (Latham 1785: 172–173, pl. LXXXII) and reused it in 1824 (Latham 1824: 296, pl. CLII). The plates differ notably in, for example, the supercilium, breast and undertail colorations (see Figs. 45) (both volumes on the Biodiversity Library are held in the Smithsonian Library). These differences may be attributable to the colourists who worked on the relevant copies during the publication process.

img-z7-1_133.jpg

Figure 6.

Tahiti Sandpiper Prosobonia leucoptera, from the Latham MS collection; note the all-rufous tail (Justin J. F. J. Jansen, © Natural History Museum, London). The plate is unsigned and by an unknown artist; it is annotated with a cross-reference to the description in Latham (1824: 296) and appears to be a copy of Forster's plate (Fig. 1), albeit with some differences, e.g., tail length, posture, bill length and leg colour. Latham's 888 original illustrations of birds in six volumes were acquired by the British Museum from Mrs E. Wickham on 24 November 1920 and are now at the Natural History Museum (NHMUK) (Latham n.d., Sawyer 1949, Jackson 1999, Jackson et al. 2013).

img-z8-1_133.jpg

We consider the differences between Moorea and Tahiti birds to represent age, sex, season or inter-island variation, rather than evidence of a separate taxon. It is possible that future work testing ancient DNA of archaeological remains on Moorea may resolve this issue, but until then we conclude that Prosobonia ellisi Sharpe, 1906b, is a junior synonym of Tringa leucoptera J. F. Gmelin, 1789.

Acknowledgments

We especially thank Laurent Raty for help with translating the Forster text, and Erik Åhlander for additional information on Anders Sparrman. Björn Bergenholz, Alison Harding and Giorgio Aimassi helped with literature. Murray Bruce, Vanesa De Pietri and Rick Roe commented on an earlier version. Staff at the British Museum and NHMUK are thanked for access to the original artwork. Paul Scofield and Guy Kirwan improved the manuscript dramatically, and our sincere thanks to them.

References:

1.

Anderson, W. c. 1780. MS. Descriptions of animals collected on Capt. Cook's second and third voyage round the world 1772–1775 & 1776–1780. MS no. 81. Natural History Museum, London. Google Scholar

2.

De Pietri, V. L., Worthy, T. H., Scofield, R. P., Cole, T. L., Wood, J. R., Cibois, A., Jansen, J. J. F. J., Zhang, G., Mitchell, K. J., Feng, S., Chen, W., Tennyson, A. J. D. & Wragg, G. M. 2020. A new extinct species of Polynesian sandpiper (Charadriiformes: Scolopacidae: Prosobonia) from Henderson Island, Pitcairn Group, and the scolopacid affinities of Prosobonia. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa115Google Scholar

3.

Fuller, E. 2002. Dodo. A brief history. Universe Publishing, New York. Google Scholar

4.

Giebel, C. 1877. Thesaurus ornithologiae , vol. 3. F. A. Brockhaus, Leipzig. Google Scholar

5.

Gmelin, J. F. 1789. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae , vol. 1(1). Georg Emanuel Beer, Leipzig. Google Scholar

6.

Hume, J. P. 2017. Extinct birds. T. & A. D. Poyser, London. Google Scholar

7.

Jackson, C. E. 1999. Dictionary of bird artists of the world. Antique Collectors' Club, Woodbridge. Google Scholar

8.

Jackson, C. E., Datta, A. & Vane-Wright, R. I. 2013. Dr John Latham and his daughter Ann. Linnean 29: 15–30. Google Scholar

9.

Jansen, J. J. F. J. & Cibois A. 2020. Clarifying the morphology of the enigmatic Kiritimati Sandpiper Prosobonia cancellata (J. F. Gmelin, 1785), based on a review of the contemporary data. Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 140: 142–146. Google Scholar

10.

Jansen, J. J. F. J., Kamminga, P. & Argeloo, M. 2021. The history of the sole surviving mount of Tahiti Sandpiper Prosobonia leucoptera. Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 141: 127–132. Google Scholar

11.

Latham, J. (n.d.). MS. Collection of 888 original watercolour drawings of birds. 6 vols. Zoology Library, Natural History Museum, London. Google Scholar

12.

Latham, J. 1785. A general synopsis of birds , vol. 3. Benjamin White, London. Google Scholar

13.

Latham, J. 1824. A general history of birds , pt. 9. Benjamin White, London. Google Scholar

14.

Lichtenstein, M. H. C. 1844. Descriptiones animalium quae in itinere ad maris australis terras per annos 1772, 1773 et 1774 suscepto collegit observavit et delineavit Johannes Reinoldus Forster. Dummler, Berlin. Google Scholar

15.

Lysaght, A. 1959. Some eighteenth century bird paintings in the Library of Sir Joseph Banks (1743–1820). Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), Hist. Ser. 1: 251–371. Google Scholar

16.

Medway, D. G. 1979. Some ornithological results of Cook's third voyage. J. Soc. Bibliogr. Nat. Hist. 9: 315–351. Google Scholar

17.

Peale, T. R. 1849. United States Exploring Expedition. During the years 1838, 1839, 1840, 1841, 1842. C. Sherman, Philadelphia. Google Scholar

18.

Sawyer, F. 1949. Notes on some original drawings of birds used by Dr John Latham. J. Soc. Bibliogr. Nat. Hist. 2: 173–180. Google Scholar

19.

Sharpe, R. B. 1906a. Birds. Pp. 79–515 in Günther, A. (ed.) The history of the collections contained in the Natural History Departments of the British Museum, vol. 2. Trustees of the Brit. Mus., London. Google Scholar

20.

Sharpe, R. B. 1906b. [On some ancient bird drawings in the British Museum, one species receiving a new name, Prosobonia ellisi ]. Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 26: 86. Google Scholar

21.

Solander, D. c. 1780. MSS. Catalogues of the birds in drawings of J.G.A. Forster and W.W. Ellis [& Webber] from Capt. Cook's second voyage, 1772-75 and third voyage 1776-80. Natural History Museum, London. Google Scholar

22.

Thibault, J.-C. & Cibois, A. 2017. Birds of eastern Polynesia. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

23.

Walters, M. 1991. Prosobonia ellisi, an extinct species of sandpiper from Moorea, Society Islands. Boll. Mus. Reg. Sci. nat. Torino 9: 217–226. Google Scholar

24.

Walters, M. 1993. On the status of the Christmas Island Sandpiper, Aechmorhynchus cancellatus. Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 113: 97–102. Google Scholar

25.

Whitehead, P. J. P. 1978. A guide to the dispersal of zoological material from Captain Cook's voyages. Pacific Stud. 2: 52–93. Google Scholar
© 2021 The Authors; This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Justin J. F. J. Jansen, Pepijn Kamminga, and Marc Argeloo "Taxonomic implications of the original illustrations of Prosobonia from Tahiti and Moorea made during the second and third Cook expeditions," Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club 141(2), 133-141, (15 June 2021). https://doi.org/10.25226/bboc.v141i2.2021.a4
Received: 7 July 2020; Published: 15 June 2021
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top