Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
2 September 2024 Extinct and endangered (‘E&E’) birds in the ornithological collection of Le Beffroi Musée Boucher de Perthes-Manessier, Abbeville, France
Christophe Gouraud, Justin J. F. J. Jansen
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Le Beffroi Musée Boucher de Perthes-Manessier, Abbeville, France, houses an ornithological collection totalling 2,597 mounted birds, principally from the 19th century. According to the current IUCN Red List of threatened species, the mounts represent 112 extinct or endangered (‘E&E’) bird taxa (156 specimens in total). We list the specimens of ‘E&E’ taxa that merit special curatorial attention. The list includes nine Extinct taxa (Greater Prairie Chicken Tympanuchus c. cupido, Passenger Pigeon Ectopistes migratorius, Snail-eating Coua Coua delalandei, Great Auk Pinguinus impennis, Norfolk Island Kaka Nestor productus, Carolina Parakeet Conuropsis carolinensis, Nuku Hiva Monarch Pomarea nukuhivae, South Island Piopio Turnagra c. capensis and Slender-billed Grackle Quiscalus palustris), one Extinct in the Wild (Guam Kingfisher Todiramphus cinnamominus) and 38 threatened species and subspecies. In addition to IUCN status, the EDGE (Evolutionary Distinctiveness and Globally Endangered) score for each species is specified.

Museums play a crucial role in preserving the world's biological heritage and disseminating knowledge (Meineke et al. 2019, Norris et al. 2024), especially as biodiversity is undergoing a major crisis (Barnosky et al. 2011, Kolbert 2014, Ceballos et al. 2015, 2017, Cooke et al. 2023). Specimens are increasingly being used, e.g. through analysis of ancient DNA, to answer questions on the biogeography, systematics, conservation and evolution of species (Holmes et al. 2016), including of extinct taxa (Feigin et al. 2018, Oswald et al. 2023). While Critically Endangered species are very difficult to access in the wild (some are known only from a few museum specimens), extinct species1 are, by definition, knowable only in collections (Adams et al. 2003). It is therefore essential for ecologists and conservationists to know ‘what is where’ in collections. For birds, this question was tackled at the start of the 20th century by Rothschild (1907) and many authors since the middle of the last century (e.g., Greenway 1958, 1967, Hahn 1963, Collar & Stuart 1985, Fuller 1987, 2000, Collar et al. 1992, Hume & Walters 2012, Hume 2017). However, with a few exceptions, these works list only specimens housed in major institutions. Moreover, because they are rare and sometimes irreplaceable, specimens of extinct or endangered (‘E&E’) taxa are often considered to be the ‘jewels’ of museums concerned and require special attention (Cooper & Adams 2005).

Le Beffroi Musée Boucher de Perthes-Manessier, Abbeville, France (hereafter Abbeville Museum) houses an important collection of natural history objects2. The inventory of ornithological material, which was undertaken between June 2021 and May 2023, led to the identification of 2,597 mounted specimens of more than 1,560 species, the vast majority originally assembled by Jules Duchesne de Lamotte (1786–1860) (Gouraud 2023), including several types (Gouraud & Absalon 2023). Photographs of all of the specimens listed here are available via the GBIF portal by searching their database.

All continents are represented, including Antarctica. However, Duchesne de Lamotte does not seem to have travelled outside a few European countries, thus non-European species were therefore acquired by purchase or exchange with other institutions (e.g., MNHN; for museum acronyms and their explanation, see Table 1) and contemporary collectors, of which there are many traces in documents archived at the museum. However, these archives are very incomplete and rarely permit us to make a direct link with a particular specimen. The only information concerning the collector and/or date and place of collection are the rare original labels formerly attached to the legs3 of some specimens (Gouraud & Absalon 2023).

We present here a catalogue of ‘E&E’ bird species and subspecies in the Abbeville Museum. According to the Red List of threatened species (IUCN 2023), the Abbeville Museum holds 156 specimens of extinct or globally threatened taxa, comprising nine Extinct taxa (EX, nine specimens), one Extinct in the Wild (EW, one specimen) and 102 threatened taxa, of which 15 are Critically Endangered (CR), 25 are Endangered (EN) and 62 are Vulnerable (VU). Taxa listed below follow the filters proposed by Adams et al. (2003: table 2), with the following additions (totalling 38 threatened species and subspecies):

Under the CR category, we included all species, i.e. 15.

Under EN and VU, we included seven and 11 taxa, respectively, comprising those with (1) a restricted geographic range, either Extent of Occurrence or Area of Occupancy (IUCN criterion B), and/or (2) a small and declining population (IUCN criterion C), see Table 2.

The list of ‘E&E’ taxa provided here follows the taxonomy and nomenclature of del Hoyo & Collar (2014, 2016), which is the basis for the Abbeville Museum ornithological collection. IUCN status is taken from the IUCN Red List of threatened species consulted during the inventory and updated on 21 December 2023 (IUCN 2023).

Gouraud (2021) mentioned the importance of the Evolutionary Distinctiveness and Globally Endangered score (hereafter EGDE score), first developed for mammals (Isaac et al. 2007) then extended to birds (Jetz et al. 2014), which is complementary to IUCN status (but note that taxa that are either Extinct or Extinct in the Wild are excluded). EDGE scores have been included based on the list compiled by Jetz et al. (2014: table S1). For a consistent assessment of the EDGE scores presented below, note that those calculated by Jetz et al. (2014) ranged from 0.58 (species with a low level of threat and low degree of genetic isolation) to 6.83 (those with a high degree of genetic isolation), and a 95th percentile of 3.94 (based on 9,993 bird species). The IUCN status of 13 species has changed since Jetz et al. (2014). We recalculated and updated their respective EDGE scores following the equation (1) in Isaac et al. (2007); they are denoted * herein.

In this catalogue, taxa are listed first in the following categories: (1) Extinct, (2) Extinct in the Wild, (3) Critically Endangered, (4) Endangered, and (5) Vulnerable. Within each category, taxa are then listed following the higher taxonomy of del Hoyo & Collar (2014, 2016). English and scientific names follow the same authors. Original combinations (protonyms) are also provided, followed by the inventory number of the specimen(s), and any collection data taken either directly from the specimens' labels or from the archives in the Abbeville and Paris museums, as well as in the literature. Finally, we provide information on population trends following data provided by BirdLife International (IUCN 2023) and, where relevant, representation in museums worldwide and in France via the VertNet and GBIF databases. The number of specimens, either mounted or skins, is mentioned only if the results suggested fewer than 100 are held worldwide in one or other of these databases4, which were searched on 18 October 2023 and 12 January and 23 February 2024.

TABLE 1

Museum acronyms mentioned in the text, listed in alphabetical order, together with any references listing or mentioning specimens of E&E species in these collections.

img-z3-3_244.gif

TABLE 2

List of taxa included in the present study, additional to the list and filters proposed by Adams et al. (2003: table 2). Note: One species, Greater Adjutant Leptoptilos dubius, was categorised EN (IUCN criteria A2bcd+3bcd+4bcd;C2a(ii)) during the inventory but its status was reappraised as Near Threatened (NT) in August 2023. Thus, this species, represented by a unique specimen (2021.0.550) in the Abbeville Museum, is excluded herein.

img-z4-4_244.gif

It is worth noting that Voisin & Voisin (1991: 107) listed a specimen (2021.0.1395) in Abbeville of the extinct Laysan Rail Zapornia palmeri, endemic to Laysan Island, Hawaii, which had been on display for c.20 years in the display dedicated to extinct species. However, this specimen is a White-browed Crake Amaurornis cinerea; it is too large to be a Laysan Rail, its tail is too long and its plumage is too grey. Voisin & Voisin (1991) noted that the specimen's plumage was quite faded for a Laysan Rail; they were probably also misled by the museum's archives, wherein it was reported to be ‘Rallaria sandwicensis5 ?’.

Extinct

GALLIFORMES

Phasianidae

GREATER PRAIRIE CHICKEN (= HEATH HEN) Tympanuchus c. cupido Tetrao cupido
Linnaeus, 1758

  • 2021.0.96—mount, adult male. No information.

  • Remarks.—The species' IUCN status is Near Threatened, but the nominate subspecies is extinct since the last bird, a male, died shortly after 11 March 1932 (Hume 2017). In France, in addition to MNHN which has one specimen, to our knowledge only the Châteaudun collection has specimens (two) of this taxon (A. Rodriguez in litt. 2023).

  • COLUMBIFORMES

    Columbidae

    PASSENGER PIGEON Ectopistes migratorius Columba migratoria
    Linnaeus, 1766

  • 2021.0.1394—mount, adult female. No information.

  • Remarks.—The last bird recorded in the wild was in 1899 or 1900, and the last captive bird (a female named ‘Martha’) died in the Cincinnati Zoological Gardens on 1 September 1914, aged 29 (Hume 2017). Mlíkovský (2012, fide Hahn 1963 and Greenway 1967) stated there are more than 1,500 specimens held in collections worldwide.

  • CUCULIFORMES

    Cuculidae

    SNAIL-EATING COUA Coua delalandei
    Coccycus [sic] Delalandei Temminck, 1827

  • 2021.0.1396—mount, adult (Fig. 1). No information. Legs and tail damaged. Some damage between the legs, where the material used to stuff the specimen is visible.

  • Remarks.—Endemic to north-east Madagascar where the last definite record was in 1834 (Hume 2017). All specimens bearing original labels were collected on Île Sainte-Marie (Nosy Bohara). At least 16 specimens are known in collections worldwide (Greenway 1967, Hume 2017; GBIF, VertNet): two at MNHN including the holotype (Voisin & Voisin 1999), two at MCZ, two at NHMUK, one at RBINS, one at Naturalis6, one at WML, one (?) in Antananarivo, Madagascar, one at SMNS, one at NMW, one at MAN, and that in Abbeville. The two specimens from the Rivoli Collection (Maciet 1846: 25) are now at ASNP and AMNH. Voisin & Voisin (1991) stated that the Abbeville specimen was the third known in French collections, but they were unaware of the bird at MAN. They also reported that the number ‘26’ was visible on the stand, but the wooden pedestal has been painted since then and it can no longer be seen.

  • Figure 1.

    Adult Snail-eating Coua Coua delalandei, registration number 2021.0.1396 (Christophe Gouraud / Le Beffroi Musée Boucher de Perthes-Manessier)

    img-z5-26_244.jpg

    CHARADRIIFORMES

    Alcidae

    GREAT AUKPinguinus impennis Alca impennis
    Linnaeus, 1758

  • 2021.0.1009—mount, adult (Fig. 2). An undated and anonymous label on the base of the pedestal reads ‘tué à Cherbourg en 1810 [shot in Cherbourg in 1810]’. A second label, also undated and anonymous, on the base reads on one side ‘Pingouin [i.e. auk] / Abbeville / N°22 [strikethrough]’ and on the reverse bears the number ‘7730’. An undated (probably post-1884 and pre-1934) note in the museum’s archives mentions that the bird was collected in Cherbourg in 1811, with the following information (translated from French): ‘Correspondence [?] from Hardy7, communicated by Mr. Goideau [sic] de Kerville. From a note sent by Mr. Moynier de Villepoix8. Undated’. The Abbeville specimen was first photographed by Henri Gadeau de Kerville (1892) (Fuller 1999: 167). It was photographed again when it was loaned to the 1965 Foire Internationale de Lille (see La Voix du Nord, 9 November 1965). The integrity of this specimen, which has sometimes been questioned (see Roncaglia 2015), was confirmed by X-ray on 6 May 2015. The specimen has lost some feathers at the base of the forehead and on the left side of the upper breast. Right wing loosely attached; webs slightly damaged.

  • Remarks.—The specimen's origin has long been debated (see Canivet 1843, Degland 1849, Gadeau de Kerville 1892, Duchaussoy 1898, Voisin & Voisin 1991, Fuller 1999, Roncaglia 2015, Pons & CAF 2020). Despite being impossible to date, it seems to have been collected in Iceland by a certain Marskal V. Moltke in 1830 and sent from the Royal Museum in Copenhagen to Jules Duchesne de Lamotte on 15 May 1831 (see Fuller 1999: 167). This conclusion was reached by Duchaussoy (1898), eventually supported by Gadeau de Kerville9, who had postulated the Normandy provenance (i.e. Hardy) a few years earlier (Gadeau de Kerville 1892). Marskal von Moltke perhaps refers to Helmuth Karl Bernhard von Moltke (1800–91), an officer in the Prussian army who trained at the military academy in Copenhagen.

  • The last specimens were collected in early June 1844 on the Icelandic islet of Eldey and a single bird was seen in December 1852 on the Grand Banks of Newfoundland (Newton 1861: 397), which is considered the last sighting of a live Great Auk. The total number of specimens known comprises 81 mounted skins, c.75 eggs and 24 complete skeletons (Hume 2017). Thirteen specimens (mounts or skins) are held in French collections (Jouanin 1962, Besson & Fuchs 2019: table V).

  • Figure 2.

    Adult Great Auk Pinguinus impennis, registration number 2021.0.1009, possibly collected in Iceland in 1830 by Helmuth Karl Bernhard von Moltke (Christophe Gouraud / Le Beffroi Musée Boucher de Perthes-Manessier)

    img-z6-8_244.jpg

    PSITTACIFORMES

    Strigopidae

    NORFOLK ISLAND KAKA Nestor productus
    Plyctolophus productus Gould, 1836

  • 2021.0.1334—mount, presumably adult male (Fig. 3). No information. The specimen has lost some feathers around the bill base.

  • Remarks.—Endemic to Norfolk and Phillip Islands, Australia. Date of extinction in the wild unknown but probably prior to the early 1850s (Gurney 1854). The last captive bird died in London after 1851 (Hume 2017).

  • Perhaps fewer than 30 specimens in collections worldwide. Our search of GBIF and VertNet, as well as the literature, has located 28 specimens in 19 different institutions: four at NHMUK, three at Naturalis (including one in ZMA prior to the merging of the collections in 2011 in Leiden, see van der Mije 2023: 4), two at WML, two at AMNH, two at AMS, two at USNM, one at BMAG, one at UMZC, one at SMTD, one at MZUF, one in SMF, one in ZIMG, one in ZMK (D. Brandis in litt. 2023), one at ANSP (the lectotype10), one at NMP, one at NMV, one at NMW (holotype of Nestor norfolcensis von Pelzeln, 1860, a junior synonym of Gould's name), one at MHH, and that in Abbeville.

  • A specimen owned by the Count Ercole Turati of Milan, later donated to the Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano, was destroyed during World War II (Violani et al. 1984). Based on Greenway (1967), Hume (2017) listed the Besançon museum, France, as holding a Nestor productus. However, the only Nestor species in Besançon is N. meridionalis (O. Cucherousset in litt. 2022). Roselaar (2003: 274) suggested the presence of a specimen in Leipzig but staff at NKML have confirmed its absence (L. Wößner in litt. 2024). There is no specimen at MNHN (none listed by Jouanin 1962; confirmed by P. Boussès in litt. 2023). To our knowledge, the Abbeville specimen is the only one in French collections.

  • Figure 3.

    Norfolk Island Kaka Nestor productus, presumably an adult male, registration number 2021.0.1334 (Christophe Gouraud / Le Beffroi Musée Boucher de Perthes-Manessier)

    img-z7-18_244.jpg

    Psittacidae

    CAROLINA PARAKEET Conuropsis carolinensis Psittacus carolinensis Linnaeus, 1758

  • 2021.0.1436—mount, adult (Fig. 4). No information.

  • Remarks.—The specimen's coloration (rather green, lacking any blue tint) and its culmen length (24.8 mm) would suggest it involves C. c. ludovicianus (Hume 2017, Snyder & Russell 2020). However, there is substantial variation in the coloration of the two subspecies and, without any collection locality, we refrain from assigning it to subspecies. Endemic to the eastern USA. The last captive bird died in the Cincinnati Zoological Gardens on 21 February 1918. Nevertheless, small and isolated populations may have persisted until the 1930s (Burgio et al. 2017, fide Snyder 2004, Snyder & Russell 2020). Approximately 720 skins in collections worldwide (Hume 2017, fide Luther 1996), including 460 bearing original data (Burgio et al. 2018).

  • PASSERIFORMES

    Monarchidae

    NUKU HIVA MONARCH Pomarea nukuhivae
    Pomarea mendozae nukuhivae Murphy & Mathews, 1928

  • 2021.0.1010—mount, adult female (Fig. 5A). Label (initially on the right leg, author unknown, Fig. 5B) reads ‘muscicapa / m. nigra. Taiti’ and bears on the reverse the number ‘18’. The real colour of the eyes in this species is dark.

  • Remarks.—Mention of ‘Tahiti’ and the identification on the label are mistakes as the specimen is clearly an adult female P. nukuhivae, which is endemic to Nuku Hiva, Marquesas (females of P. nigra, endemic to Tahiti, are like males of the same species, i.e. black). The last observations of live birds were in the 1930s (Hume 2017). Searches of VertNet and GBIF produced 46 and 53 specimens, respectively, in museums worldwide (the vast majority at AMNH). Four specimens are also present at NHMUK (Knox & Walters 1994). In French collections, Gouraud (2014b) listed two specimens at MLC, and GBIF shows two specimens at MNHN (not mentioned by Jouanin 1962). The museum in Châteaudun also has a specimen (A. Rodriguez in litt. 2023). Thus, the Abbeville specimen seems to be the sixth known in France.

  • Figure 4.

    Adult Carolina Parakeet Conuropsis carolinensis, registration number 2021.0.1436 (Christophe Gouraud / Le Beffroi Musée Boucher de Perthes-Manessier)

    img-z8-14_244.jpg

    Figure 5A.

    Adult female Nuku Hiva Monarch Pomarea nukuhivae, registration number 2021.0.1010 (Christophe Gouraud / Le Beffroi Musée Boucher de Perthes-Manessier)

    img-z8-30_244.jpg

    Figure 5B.

    Label initially attached to the right leg of specimen 2021.0.1010 (Nuku Hiva Monarch Pomarea nukuhivae). Top: front ‘muscicapa / m. nigra. Taiti’. Below: reverse: ‘n° 18’ (Christophe Gouraud / Le Beffroi Musée Boucher de Perthes-Manessier)

    img-z9-1_244.jpg

    Oriolidae

    SOUTH ISLAND PIOPIO Turnagra c. capensis
    Tanagra capensis Sparrman, 1787

  • 2021.0.1682—mount, adult. No information. Tail damaged.

  • Remarks.—Subspecies endemic to South Island, New Zealand, where the last specimen was collected in 1902 and the last confirmed observation occurred three years later (Hume 2017). A search of VertNet and GBIF located 85 and 138 specimens in collections worldwide (of all subspecies), including nine at MNHN (not listed by Jouanin 1962). In French collections, there are also two specimens at MZS (subspecies unknown).

  • Figure 6A.

    (left). Adult male Slender-billed Grackle Quiscalus palustris, registration number 2021.0.2382 (Christophe Gouraud / Le Beffroi Musée Boucher de Perthes-Manessier)

    img-z10-1_244.jpg

    Figure 6B.

    (above). Label initially attached to the right leg of specimen 2021.0.2382 (Slender-billed Grackle Quiscalus palustris). Top: front ‘1625 210071’. Below: reverse: ‘Quiscalus tenuirostre / Swainson / Mexique’ (Christophe Gouraud / Le Beffroi Musée Boucher de Perthes-Manessier)

    img-AoyA_244.jpg

    Icteridae

    SLENDER-BILLED GRACKLE Quiscalus palustris
    Scaphidurus palustris Swainson, 1827

  • 2021.0.2382—mount, adult male (Fig. 6A). Label (initially on the right leg, author unknown, Fig. 6B) bears the number (or numbers) ‘1625 210071’ and on the reverse is inscribed ‘Quiscalus tenuirostre11 / Swainson / Mexique’. Tail damaged, with part of a rectrix detached and placed in a plastic bag attached to one leg.

  • Remarks.—Endemic to the Valley of Mexico, in central Mexico, where the last bird was shot in 1910 (Hume 2017). However, R. Gordon reported an individual seen at Lerma marshes, México state, on 6 March 1953 ( https://ebird.org/checklist/S1240039812). VertNet and GBIF list 30 and 38 specimens, respectively. Jouanin (1962) did not report this species at MNHN, but a female from the Boucard collection was found recently (P. Boussès in litt. 2023). The Abbeville and Paris specimens might be the only ones in French collections.

  • Extinct in the Wild

    CORACIIFORMES

    Alcedinidae

    GUAM KINGFISHER Todiramphus cinnamominus
    Halcyon cinnamomina Swainson, 1821

  • 2021.0.1446—mount, adult female. The archive at MNHN lists a female Guam Kingfisher collected during the Astrolabe circumnavigation (1826–29) and exchanged with Duchesne de Lamotte in October 1837. Specimen 2021.0.1446 must be this bird. It was collected by/ for Joseph Paul Gaimard and Jean René Quoy, naturalists aboard L'Astrolabe, which called at Guam in May–August 1828. Only a single kingfisher was collected on Guam (Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire 1829: folio 253).

  • Remarks.—Extinct in the wild since 1986, when the last 29 remaining wild birds were taken into captivity for captive breeding. In 2013 the captive population numbered 124 individuals. VertNet, GBIF and Jouanin (1962) do not list any specimens in French collections. Nevertheless, one is held at MLC, and Besson & Fuchs (2019: table V) mentioned five specimens in three museums (including MLC). The Abbeville specimen is therefore the sixth known in French collections.

  • Critically Endangered

    CHARADRIIFORMES

    Charadriidae

    SOCIABLE LAPWING Vanellus gregarius EDGE score: 5.23
    Charadrius gregarius Pallas, 1811

  • 2021.0.689—mount, adult male. Right leg detached from the pedestal. Archives in Abbeville Museum mention two birds acquired from Prince Maximilian zu Wied-Neuwied (1782–1867) in 1854 that had been collected in Sarepta (nowadays Old Sarepta, Volgograd, Russia). These two specimens were listed under numbers 1594 and 4453. As specimen 2021.0.689 bears no information, it is impossible to link it to one of these (see Gouraud & Absalon 2023); the other specimen is now missing.

  • Remarks.—Breeds in south-central Russia and Kazakhstan; winters from Eritrea to Pakistan and north-west India. Number of mature individuals estimated at 11,200; population decreasing.

  • Scolopacidae

    ESKIMO CURLEW Numenius borealis EDGE score: 5.23
    Scolopax borealis J. R. Forster, 1772

  • 2021.0.1407—mount, presumably adult. No information.

  • Remarks.—Little is known concerning the distribution of this species. Confirmed to breed in two areas of Northwest Territories, Canada; winter range southern South America. Number of mature individuals estimated at 1–49; population trend unknown. Not reported with certainty since 1963 and is probably extinct (Hume 2017). Searches in VertNet and GBIF revealed 323 and 345 specimens, respectively. Voisin & Voisin (1991) reported 369 (including this one) in museum collections. At least one other specimen has been discovered since, housed at MLC.

  • SLENDER-BILLED CURLEW Numenius tenuirostris EDGE score: 5.22
    Numenius tenuirostris Vieillot, 1817

  • 2021.0.1408—mount, presumably adult. Tip of tail and middle toe on right leg both damaged. Baillon (1834: 69) listed the species as having been found only once near Abbeville. Specimen 2021.0.1408 could be one of the two reported by Marcotte (1861: 327): one from Cayeux (now part of Cayeux-sur-Mer) and another from the marshes of Noyelles (now Noyelles-sur-Mer). The other could be that listed by Baillon and held at MLC (it bears no information, see Gouraud 2014b).

  • Remarks.—The only known breeding site is near Tara, Omsk Oblast, Russia. Based on stable-isotope analysis, Buchanan et al. (2018) suggested that the species' breeding grounds were in the steppes of northern Kazakhstan and parts of southern Russia. Winter records are available from North Africa east to the Persian Gulf. Number of mature individuals estimated at 1–49; population decreasing. Last seen with certainty in April 2001 (Hume 2017). In total, 420 specimens are known in museum collections worldwide, including 27 in France (Buchanan et al. submitted)13.

  • ACCIPITRIFORMES

    Accipitridae

    RED-HEADED VULTURE Sarcogyps calvus EDGE score: 5.49
    Vultur calvus Scopoli, 1786

  • 2021.0.1021—mount, adult. No information. Tips of tail and wings damaged.

  • Remarks.—Now confined mainly to the northern Indian Subcontinent; rare in Bangladesh, Myanmar and Cambodia, and extinct or extremely rare in Pakistan, southern China, Thailand and Singapore. Number of mature individuals estimated at 2,500–9,999; population decreasing. VertNet and GBIF list 45 and 98 specimens, respectively.

  • WHITE-RUMPED VULTURE Gyps bengalensis EDGE score: 4.63
    Vultur bengalensis J. F. Gmelin, 1788

  • 2021.0.1022—mount, adult. No information. Tips of tail and wings damaged. Some feathers missing from the tibial region.

  • Remarks.—The extant population ranges from south-east Pakistan across the Indian Subcontinent, Myanmar and Cambodia. Possibly extinct in Iran, Afghanistan, Laos, Thailand, Vietnam and Malaysia. Number of mature individuals estimated at 4,000–6,000; population decreasing.

  • SLENDER-BILLED VULTURE Gyps tenuirostris EDGE score: 4.39
    Gyps tenuirostris G. R. Gray, 1844

  • 2021.0.1024—mount, presumably adult. No information. Tips of tail and wings damaged; claw on rear toe of left leg broken.

  • Remarks.—The extant population ranges across northern India, southern Nepal, Bangladesh, Myanmar, southern Laos and eastern Cambodia. Possibly extinct in north-west India, Thailand, western Laos, western Cambodia, and western and southern Vietnam. Number of mature individuals estimated at 730–870; population decreasing. VertNet and GBIF list just nine and five specimens, respectively. Not mentioned by Jouanin (1962) and Besson & Fuchs (2019); thus, the Abbeville bird is perhaps the only specimen in France and the second in Europe, after the holotype at NHMUK (Warren 1966: 293).

  • BUCEROTIFORMES

    Bucerotidae

    HELMETED HORNBILL Rhinoplax vigil EDGE score: 5.79*
    Buceros vigil Pennant, 1781

  • 2021.0.1081—mount, presumably adult male. No information. Tail damaged and incomplete; legs also damaged.

  • Remarks.—From extreme southern Myanmar through the Thai-Malay Peninsula, Sumatra and Borneo. Number of mature individuals unknown, but population decreasing fast. VertNet and GBIF both list 65 specimens.

  • PICIFORMES

    Picidae

    IVORY-BILLED WOODPECKER Campephilus p. principalis EDGE score: 4.21
    Picus principalis Linnaeus, 1758

  • 2021.0.1429—mount, adult male. No information. Front toes of right leg damaged; left side of the body and crown have lost some feathers. Voisin & Voisin (1991) mentioned illegible inscriptions on the base of the pedestal, which could not be checked because the stand has been painted since.

  • Remarks.—Subspecies endemic to the south-east USA. Recent observations in Arkansas (Fitzpatrick et al. 2005), Florida (Hill et al. 2006) and Louisiana (Collins 2011) are controversial, hotly debated (Dalton 2010, Lynch 2011) but still being reported (Latta et al. 2023, plus references therein). Number of mature individuals estimated at 1–49; population trend unknown. Despite the number of reports, including supposed photographic evidence and sound-recordings, there are no undisputed sightings since 1944, and this subspecies is generally believed to have survived until no later than the 1960s. The subspecies bairdii was last definitely reported in March 1988 (Kirkconnell et al. 2020).

  • Voisin & Voisin (1991, fide Greenway 1958) reported that specimens are known in only 11 museums worldwide, but noted that a few more could probably be added. Hume (2017) mentioned that many specimens are held in museums worldwide, but did not report a total. Kirkconnell et al. (2020) listed a total of 32 specimens of bairdii in European, North American and Cuban museums.

  • IMPERIAL WOODPECKER Campephilus imperialis EDGE score: 4.22
    Picus imperialis Gould, 1832

  • 2021.0.1430—mount, adult male (Fig. 7). Label (initially on the right leg) reads ‘Dryocopus imperialis (Gould) / Amer. Sept.’

  • Remarks.—Endemic to the highlands of western Mexico. Last confirmed observation in 1956 (Hume 2017). Number of mature individuals estimated at 1–49; population trend unknown. Work by Brown & Clark (2009) and, more recently, by Leese et al. (2022) yielded a total of 189 specimens in museums worldwide, of which 40 are complete mounts or skins, and the majority are incomplete or partial skins and skeletons. The Abbeville specimen is thus the 41st complete specimen. VertNet, GBIF, Jouanin (1962) and Besson & Fuchs (2019) all suggest that the specimen in Abbeville is the only one in France. The original label mentions the genus Dryocopus. As this species was not transferred to Campephilus until 1849, although Gould described it in Picus, this suggests the label can be dated prior to 1849. Pre-1860 specimens are rare in collections and involve only the six syntypes identified by Prŷs-Jones (2011) and the four specimens attributed to the Rivoli collection, collected in 1836, and now at ANSP (K. Clark in litt. 2024). Therefore, it is possible that this specimen is a seventh syntype or that it emanates from the Massena collection14.

  • Figure 7.

    Adult male Imperial Woodpecker Campephilus imperialis, registration number 2021.0.1430 (Christophe Gouraud / Le Beffroi Musée Boucher de Perthes-Manessier)

    img-z14-1_244.jpg

    PSITTACIFORMES

    Psittacidae

    ULTRAMARINE LORIKEET Vini ultramarina EDGE score: 4.07*
    Psittacus ultramarinus Kuhl, 1820

  • 2021.0.1440—mount, presumably adult. No information.

  • Remarks.—Endemic to the Marquesas, French Polynesia, where probably confined to Ua Huka. Number of mature individuals estimated at 1,000–2,499; population stable. VertNet and GBIF list 34 and 52 specimens, respectively. Voisin & Voisin (1991) listed one specimen in Abbeville with the following annotation on the pedestal's base: ‘Psittacus / Coriphylus Gompili [sic] / ♂ / Nouka-Hiva / Mr. Massie 141-5’. Specimen 2021.0.1440 is the only example of this species in the collection and therefore is presumably the same one. ‘Coriphylus Gompili’ refers undoubtedly to Coryphilus goupilii Hombron & Pucheran, 1853, a junior synonym of Psittacus ultramarinus Kuhl, 1820. ‘Massie’ could refer to Auguste-Samuel Massieu de Clerval (1785–1847), a French naval officer. The Baillon Collection at MLC comprises more than 80 specimens from Massieu de Clerval, five of them from Nuku-Hiva (see Gouraud 2014b). Baillon’s specimens mention either ‘Mr. Massieu de Clerval’ or ‘Mr. Massieu’. Why the inscription mentioned by Voisin & Voisin is now missing is unknown; it may have been written on a label that has since been lost.

  • PASSERIFORMES

    Cotingidae

    BANDED COTINGA Cotinga maculata EDGE score: 4.76*
    Ampelis maculatus Statius Müller, 1776

  • 2021.0.1554—mount, adult male. No information. Tail missing.

  • Remarks.—Endemic to the Atlantic Forest of Brazil and now confined to a handful of protected areas. Number of mature individuals estimated at 50–249; population decreasing. VertNet and GBIF list 31 and 55 specimens in collections worldwide, respectively, including two in French collections, one each at MHNL and MLC. A third specimen has been found in Châteaudun (A. Rodriguez in litt. 2023). The Abbeville specimen seems to be the fourth known in France.

  • Meliphagidae

    REGENT HONEYEATER Anthochaera phrygia EDGE score: 4.81
    Merops phrygius Shaw, 1794

  • 2021.0.1677—mount, presumably adult. No information.

  • Remarks.—Endemic to south-east Australia, with a very patchy breeding range. Number of mature individuals estimated at 350–400; population decreasing. VertNet and GBIF list ten and 415 specimens in collections worldwide, respectively. In addition to one at MNHN and the five listed by Besson & Fuchs (2019: table V), there is another specimen in Châteaudun (A. Rodriguez in litt. 2023) and one in La Chaize-le-Vicomte (Vimpère 2019: 457). The Abbeville specimen is therefore the ninth specimen known in France.

  • Corvidae

    JAVAN GREEN MAGPIE Cissa thalassina EDGE score: 4.90
    Kitta thalassina Temminck, 1826

  • 2021.0.1618—mount, presumably adult. No information. Tip of tail slightly damaged.

  • Remarks.—Endemic to Java, Indonesia, where it is confined to montane forest in the west of the island. Number of mature individuals estimated at 50–249; population decreasing. VertNet and GBIF list 30 and 84 specimens, respectively.

  • The taxonomy of C. thalassina has changed since Jetz et al. (2014) published their work. This species was previously lumped with Bornean Green Magpie C. jefferyi. However, the increase in extinction risk (i.e. the IUCN status) due to the split should be balanced against the decrease in evolutionary distinctiveness, resulting in an EDGE score that is little changed (Jetz et al. 2014: 4). We therefore maintain the EDGE score assigned by Jetz et al. (2014), i.e. 4.90.

  • Emberizidae

    YELLOW-BREASTED BUNTING Emberiza aureola EDGE score: 4.55*
    Emberiza aureola Pallas, 1773

  • 2021.0.2311—mount, presumably adult male E. a. aureola. No information. Tail missing and bill tip broken; right toe on left leg damaged.

  • 2021.0.2312—mount, presumably adult male E. a. aureola. Label (initially on the left leg) reads ‘Kasan. May. 1833 / E. aureola. mas’.

  • 2021.0.2313—mount, presumably adult male E. a. aureola. Label (initially on the right leg) reads ‘Emberiza / aureola mâle / N 8. Sibirien’. Right leg damaged and claw of middle toe on left leg missing.

  • 2021.0.2314—mount, presumably adult male E. a. aureola. No information. Claw of rear toe on left leg missing.

  • 2021.0.2315—mount, presumably immature (second-year) male E. a. aureola. No information. Bill tip broken and left leg detached from body.

  • Remarks.—Breeds from western Russia east to Kamchatka, the Kuril Islands and northern Japan, south to northern Mongolia and north-east China; winters mainly in southern China and South-East Asia. No estimate as to the number of mature individuals. Across its range, it is precautionarily estimated that the rate of decline over three generations could be 80–99%, mainly due to persistent hunting and trapping, but also the ongoing negative impacts of agro-industrial farming and the use of herbicides and pesticides. As a result, the species is now listed as Critically Endangered.

  • Dated May 1833, specimen 2021.0.2312 could have been collected by the explorer and naturalist Eduard Friedrich von Eversmann (1794–1860), who died in Kazan, Volga, Russia. He became a Professor of Zoology and Botany at the University of Kazan in 1828 (Mearns & Mearns 2022).

  • Leiotrichidae

    RUFOUS-FRONTED LAUGHINGTHRUSH Garrulax r. rufifrons EDGE score: 4.21*
    Garrulax rufifrons Lesson, 1831

  • 2021.0.1886—mount, presumably adult. No information.

  • Remarks.—Subspecies endemic to West Java. Number of mature individuals estimated at 50–249; population decreasing. VertNet and GBIF list 32 and 140 specimens, respectively.

  • Endangered

    ANSERIFORMES

    Anatidae

    MELLER'S DUCK Anas melleri EDGE score: 2.99
    Anas melleri P. L. Sclater, 1865

  • 2021.0.252—mount, adult. No information. Right leg damaged.

  • Remarks.—Endemic to Madagascar. Number of mature individuals estimated at 1,300–3,300; population decreasing. VertNet and GBIF list 68 and 97 specimens, respectively.

  • CHARADRIIFORMES

    Laridae

    INDIAN SKIMMER Rynchops albicollis EDGE score: 4.28*
    Rhynchops albicollis Swainson, 1838

  • 2021.0.809—mount, adult. No information. Tips of wings and tail damaged.

  • Remarks.—Patchily distributed from eastern Pakistan to western Myanmar. Number of mature individuals estimated at 2,450–2,900; population decreasing. VertNet and GBIF list 29 and 42 specimens, respectively.

  • PERUVIAN TERN Sternula lorata EDGE score: 3.75
    Sterna lorata Philippi & Landbeck, 1861

  • 2021.0.878—mount, adult. No information. Tips of wings and tail damaged.

  • Remarks.—Breeds in fewer than ten colonies in Peru and northern Chile. Number of mature individuals estimated at 600–1,700; population decreasing.

  • PASSERIFORMES

    Tityridae

    BUFF-THROATED PURPLETUFT Iodopleura pipra EDGE score: 4.50*
    Pardalotus pipra Lesson, 1831

  • 2021.0.1561—mount, presumably adult male. No information. Some feathers missing on its right side; right leg damaged.

  • Remarks.—Endemic to eastern Brazil. Number of mature individuals estimated at 1,000–2,499; population decreasing. VertNet and GBIF list 51 and 77 specimens, respectively, including one in France at MDLV. A second specimen has been found in Châteaudun (A. Rodriguez in litt. 2023) and a third, originally housed in La Chaize-le-Vicomte, was sent to MNHN in 1947 (Vimpère 2019: 279). The Abbeville specimen is therefore the fourth known in French collections.

  • Monarchidae

    TRUK MONARCHMetabolus rugensis EDGE score: 3.45
    Muscicapa rugensis Hombron & Jacquinot, 1841

  • 2021.0.1716—mount, adult male. Label (initially on the right leg) reads ‘♂. yeux noirs / Carolines. / Hogoleu [an old name for the Chuuk Islands].’ and on the reverse ‘J [?]’. Tail slightly damaged.

  • Remarks.—Endemic to Chuuk (formerly Truk) Atoll, in the Caroline Islands, Federated States of Micronesia. Number of mature individuals estimated at 1,000–2,499; population decreasing. VertNet and GBIF list 48 and 70 specimens, respectively. MNHN holds five specimens15, making the Abbeville bird the sixth known in France. The specimen was perhaps collected during the visit by L'Astrolabe and La Zélée to the Carolines in December 1838; it was considered a probable syntype of Muscicapa rugensis Hombron & Jacquinot, 1841 (Gouraud & Absalon 2023).

  • Sturnidae

    BLACK-WINGED MYNAAcridotheres melanopterus EDGE score: 3.30
    Gracula melanoptera Daudin, 1800

  • 2021.0.1938—mount, presumably adult. No information.

  • Remarks.—Endemic to north-west Java; introduced in Singapore. Although treated as a species by del Hoyo & Collar (2016) and Eaton et al. (2021), BirdLife reversed its earlier decision to split this species from Grey-backed Myna Acridotheres tricolor and Greyrumped Myna A. tertius leading to the revised Red List status of Endangered. However, the increase in extinction risk due to splitting is balanced by the decrease in evolutionary distinctiveness, so the EDGE score should change very little (Jetz et al. 2014: 4). Therefore, we have maintained the EDGE score assigned by Jetz et al. (2014), i.e. 3.30. If the number of mature individuals is estimated at 150–190 (including A. tricolor and A. tertius), it is possible that A. melanopterus alone has been extirpated in the wild (Eaton et al. 2021). Irrespective of taxonomy, the population is declining. VertNet and GBIF list two and 192 specimens, respectively.

  • Mimidae

    WHITE-BREASTED THRASHER Ramphocinclus b. brachyurus EDGE score: 4.10
    Turdus brachyurus Vieillot, 1818

  • 2021.0.1962—mount, presumably adult. No information.

  • Remarks.—Subspecies endemic to Martinique, where now restricted to the Caravelle Peninsula. Number of mature individuals estimated at 1,300–1,400; population decreasing.

  • Estrildidae

    JAVA SPARROW Lonchura oryzivora EDGE score: 3.88*
    Loxia oryzivora Linnaeus, 1758

  • 2021.0.2130—mount, presumably adult. No information.

  • 2021.0.2131—mount, presumably adult. No information.

  • Remarks.—Endemic to Java, Bali, Kangean and possibly Bawean; introduced to many places around the world. Number of mature individuals in native range estimated at 1,000–2,499; population decreasing.

  • Vulnerable

    GALLIFORMES

    Phasianidae

    WESTERN TRAGOPAN Tragopan melanocephalus EDGE score: 3.30
    Phasianus melanocephalus J. E. Gray, 1829

  • 2021.0.42—mount, adult male. No information.

  • Remarks.—Disjunct distribution in north-west Himalayas from northern Pakistan to north-west India and south-west Tibet. Number of mature individuals estimated at 3,300; population declining.

  • CAPRIMULGIFORMES

    Trochilidae16

    BLACK INCA Coeligena prunellei EDGE score: 3.44
    Trochilus prunellei Bourcier, 1843

  • 2021.0.380—mount. Inscription on the pedestal base reads ‘8. / Prunellii [sic]’. Right wing and leg loosely attached.

  • Remarks.—Endemic to the departments of Boyacá, Santander and Cundinamarca in Colombia. Number of mature individuals estimated at 7,500; population decreasing.

  • CUCULIFORMES

    Cuculidae

    RED-FACED MALKOHA Phaenicophaeus pyrrhocephalus EDGE score: 4.01
    Cucullus pyrrhocephalus Pennant, 1769

  • 2021.0.412—mount, presumably adult. Label (initially on the right leg) reads ‘Phoenicophaus pyrrhocephalus (Vieill. / le Malcoha Pyrrhocephale / Philippines’. Tail and base of the maxilla damaged; some feathers on the flanks lost.

  • Remarks.—Endemic to southern Sri Lanka (the locality mentioned on the label is wrong). Number of mature individuals estimated at 2,500–9,999; population decreasing. VertNet and GBIF list 32 and 42 specimens, respectively.

  • PROCELLARIIFORMES

    Diomedeidae

    SHORT-TAILED ALBATROSS Phoebastria albatrus EDGE score: 3.82
    Diomedea albatrus Pallas, 1769

  • 2021.0.529—mount, immature. No information. Tips of wings and tail damaged; right eye damaged.

  • Remarks.—Confined to the northern Pacific, breeding only on Torishima and the Senkaku Islands, Japan. Number of mature individuals estimated at 1,734; population increasing.

  • CHARADRIIFORMES

    Laridae

    AUSTRALIAN FAIRY TERN Sternula nereis horni EDGE score: 3.14
    Sterna nereis horni Mathews, 1912

  • 2021.0.879—mount, adult male. Label (initially on the right leg) reads: ‛Male. Jan. 11. 1843 / South Island / Houtman's Abrolhos. /// Sternula nereis Gould / Irides / Brown.' Right leg and tips of tail and wings all damaged.

  • Remarks.—Collected by John Gilbert (1812–45) on the Houtman Abrolhos Islands, Western Australia, on 11 January 1843 (see Gouraud & Absalon 2023). Ranges from Western Australia (subspecies horni), South Australia, Victoria and Tasmania, east to northern North Island, New Zealand, and New Caledonia. Number of mature individuals estimated at 2,500–9,999; population decreasing. VertNet and GBIF list six and 75 specimens, respectively.

  • CATHARTIFORMES

    Cathartidae

    ANDEAN CONDOR Vultur gryphus EDGE score: 5.19*
    Vultur gryphus Linnaeus, 1758

  • 2021.0.987—mount, male. No information. Tip of tail damaged.

  • Remarks.—Mainly confined to the Andes from northern Colombia south to Tierra del Fuego (Chile and Argentina). Number of mature individuals estimated at 6,700; population decreasing.

  • PSITTACIFORMES

    Psittacidae

    ST LUCIA PARROT Amazona versicolor EDGE score: 2.67
    Psittacus versicolor Statius Müller, 1776

  • 2021.0.1343—mount, presumably adult. No information. Tail and wings missing and were, at some time, replaced by a tail and wings from a male Moluccan Eclectus Eclectus roratus.

  • Remarks.—Endemic to upland wet forest in central and southern St Lucia. Number of mature individuals estimated at 1,150–1,500; population increasing. VertNet and GBIF list 76 and 74 specimens, respectively.

  • MAROON-FACED PARAKEET Pyrrhura leucotis EDGE score: 2.46*
    Psittacus leucotis Kuhl, 1820

  • 2021.0.1351—mount, presumably adult. Label (initially on the right leg) reads ‘du Brésil / (Rio Janeiro) / Ménétries / Août 1824’ and on the reverse ‘157 / Brésil / [and in different handwriting] Perruche / à gorge / variée’. The back has lost some feathers and the tail is damaged.

  • Remarks.—Endemic to eastern Brazil from southern Bahia to Rio de Janeiro. Number of mature individuals estimated at 2,500–9,999; population decreasing. Edouard Ménétries (1802–61) joined the German explorer and naturalist Baron Georg Heinrich von Langsdorff (1774–1852) in Brazil between 1822 and 1825.

  • PASSERIFORMES

    Pipridae

    YELLOW-HEADED MANAKIN Chloropipo flavicapilla EDGE score: 3.37*
    Pipra flavicapilla P. L. Sclater, 1852

  • 2021.0.2396—mount, presumably adult male. No information. Bill and tail are damaged.

  • Remarks.—Patchily distributed in the Andes of Colombia. Its presence in Ecuador appears to have been disproved (Palacio 2023). Number of mature individuals estimated at 3,500–4,000; population decreasing. VertNet and GBIF list 34 and 73 specimens, respectively.

  • Cotingidae

    WHITE-WINGED COTINGA Xipholena atropurpurea EDGE score: 3.05*
    Ampelis atro-purpurea Wied-Neuwied17, 1820

  • 2021.0.1556—mount, adult male. No information.

  • 2021.0.1557—mount, adult male. No information. Bill tip broken. The specimen has orangey feathers on its chin and breast. A few specimens of male Pompadour Cotinga X. punicea show similar coloration. It has been suggested that this could be evidence of a type of leucism or, alternatively, that the individuals concerned were placed near a fire shortly after collection (Kirwan & Green 2011: 434, and references therein).

  • Remarks.—Endemic to the Atlantic Forest of Brazil and now patchily distributed. Number of mature individuals estimated at 2,500–9,999; population decreasing.

  • Tityridae

    ATLANTIC ROYAL FLYCATCHER Onychorhynchus swainsoni EDGE score: 3.82
    Muscivora swainsoni von Pelzeln, 1858

  • 2021.0.1559—mount, presumably adult. No information. Bill and tail damaged.

  • Remarks.—Endemic to south-east Brazil. Number of mature individuals estimated at 600–1,700; population decreasing. VertNet and GBIF list 16 and nine specimens in collections worldwide, respectively, but none in France. However, in addition to specimen 2021.0.1559, two specimens of this species are at MNHN18.

  • Campephagidae

    MAURITIUS CUCKOOSHRIKE Lalage typica EDGE score: 3.01
    Oxynotus typicus Hartlaub, 1865

  • 2021.0.2423—mount, presumably adult female. Label (initially on the left leg) reads ‘Chusan [= Zhoushan], China’. Tail damaged. Part of one rectrix has become detached and is placed in a plastic bag attached to one leg.

  • Remarks.—Endemic to Mauritius, where probably widespread prior to human colonisation. Now restricted to the south of the island, where it has a very small range. Number of mature individuals estimated at 600–700; population stable. VertNet and GBIF list only six specimens, all at MNHN. However, another is at AMNH, where two, collected in January 1874, were once held19.

  • The information on the original label (i.e. Zhoushan, China) is obviously incorrect as the species is endemic to Mauritius. The origin of this specimen is almost certainly British, firstly due to mention of ‘China’ (not ‘Chine’, the French name), and secondly because British forces were present in Zhoushan in the 1840s and 1860s. The ship that brought this specimen from Mauritius was most likely from or heading to Zhoushan, and the specimen was mislabelled as a result.

  • Acrocephalidae

    AQUATIC WARBLER Acrocephalus paludicola EDGE score: 3.44
    Sylvia paludicola Vieillot, 1817

  • 2021.0.1818—mount. No information.

  • 2021.0.1819—mount. No information.

  • Remarks.—Patchy breeding distribution from north-east Germany to Lithuania, southwest and southern Belarus, and north-west and northern Ukraine. Wintering areas, in West Africa, also patchy. Number of mature individuals estimated at 18,000–29,000; population decreasing.

  • TAHITI REED WARBLER Acrocephalus caffer EDGE score: 2.43*
    Sitta caffra Sparrman, 1786

  • 2021.0.1822—mount, presumably adult. No information. Tip of tail damaged. Central rectrix broken. Claw on rear toe of right leg missing.

  • Remarks.—Endemic to Tahiti, Society Islands. Number of mature individuals estimated at 250–999; population stable. VertNet and GBIF list 60 and 98 specimens, respectively.

  • Icteridae

    MARTINIQUE ORIOLE Icterus bonana EDGE score: 2.75
    Oriolus bonana Linnaeus, 1766

  • 2021.0.2369—mount, presumably adult. No information.

  • 2021.0.2370—mount, presumably adult. No information. Right wing loosely attached.

  • Remarks.—Endemic to Martinique. Number of mature individuals estimated at 6,000–15,000; population decreasing. VertNet and GBIF list 54 and 76 specimens, respectively.

  • Conclusions

    The inventory and study of Abbeville's ornithological collection once again demonstrates that ‘small’ collections frequently contain rare and valuable specimens. Their historical and scientific importance can be as great as that of collections in major institutions and therefore should not be under-estimated (Steinheimer 2003, 2005, Casas-Marce et al. 2012, Gouraud 2014a,b, 2015, 2021, Gouraud & Absalon 2023). If more than 500 bird taxa have become extinct in the last 700 years (as suggested by Hume 2017), it is probably only a matter of time before other species are added to this list. Some species may be even more at risk than currently thought (Bates et al. 2024) and several recently rediscovered species remain on the brink of extinction (Scheffers et al. 2011). In the context of global biodiversity loss (see, e.g., Szabo et al. 2012), we encourage curators to publish lists of ‘E&E’ taxa held in their collections or to reassess them in the case of older published inventories.

    Acknowledgements

    The inventory of the Abbeville Museum's ornithological collection was supported by the Direction Régionale des Affaires Culturelles (DRAC Hauts-de-France), the Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche, and the city of Abbeville. We are grateful to the following for their help, listed in alphabetic order: Patrick Absalon, Olivia Beavers, Alex Bond, Patrick Boussès, Dirk Brandis, Kevin Clark, Ombline Cucherousset, Mélanie Daurat, Clemency Fisher, Jérôme Fuchs, Hein van Grouw, Julian Hume, Mathew Lowe, Gerald Mayr, Christian Migeon, Sandra Pinto, Nate Rice, Anna Rodriguez, Brian K. Schmidt, Paul Sweet, Jeremiah Trimble, Carlo Violani, Yves Walter, John James Wilson, Friederike Woog and Linda Wößner. Our sincere thanks also go to Julian Hume, Robert Prŷs-Jones and an anonymous referee for their valuable comments and suggestions.

    © 2024 The Authors

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

    References:

    1.

    Adams, M. P., Cooper, J. H. & Collar, N. J. 2003. Extinct and endangered (‘E&E’) birds: a proposed list for collection catalogues. Pp. 338–354 in Collar, N., Fisher, C. & Feare, C. (eds.) Why museums matter: avian archives in an age of extinction. Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 123A. Google Scholar

    2.

    Anon. 1899. Editorial gleanings. The Zoologist 3(695): 234–240. Google Scholar

    3.

    Baillon, L. A. F. [1833] 1834. Catalogue des Mammifères, Oiseaux, Reptiles, Poissons et Mollusques testacés marins, observés dans l'arrondissement d'Abbeville. Mém. Soc. Emul. Abbeville [1]: 49–80. Google Scholar

    4.

    Barnosky, A. D., Matzke, N., Tomiya, S., Wogan, G. O. U., Swartz, B., Quental, T. B., Marshall, C., McGuire, J. L., Lindsey, E. L., Maguire, K. C., Mersey, B. & Ferrer, E. A. 2011. Has the Earth's sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature 471(7336): 51–57. Google Scholar

    5.

    Bates, R., Taylor, E., Sun, Y., Gumbs, R., Böhm, M., Gray, C. & Rosindell, J. 2024. Quantifying the IUCN Red List: using historical assessments to calculate future extinction risk. bioRxiv preprint.  https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.04.578808Google Scholar

    6.

    Benson, C. W. 1972. Skins of extinct or near extinct birds in Cambridge. Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 92: 59–68. Google Scholar

    7.

    Benson, C. W. & Schüz, E. 1971. A specimen of Coua delalandei (Temminck) (Cuculidae). Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 91: 159–160. Google Scholar

    8.

    Besson, L. & Fuchs, J. 2019. Les collections ornithologiques conservées en France: Bilan de l'enquête nationale 2017. Alauda 87(HS): 3–32. Google Scholar

    9.

    Bouteiller, A. 1878. Histoire de la ville de Dieppe depuis son origine jusqu'à nos jours. Emile Delevoye, Dieppe. Google Scholar

    10.

    Brown, D. E. & Clark, K. B. 2009. Lost treasure of the Sierra Madre: an obituary for the Imperial Woodpecker. Pp. 67–109 in Snyder, N. F. R., Brown, D. E. & Clark, K. B. (eds.) The travails of two woodpeckers: Ivory-bills and Imperials. Univ. of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. Google Scholar

    11.

    Buchanan, G. M., Bond, A. L., Crockford, N. J., Kamp, J., Pearce-Higgins, J. W. & Hilton, G. M. 2018. The potential breeding range of Slender-billed Curlew Numenius tenuirostris identified from stable-isotope analysis. Bird Conserv. Intern. 28: 228–237. Google Scholar

    12.

    Buchanan, G. M., Chapple, B., Berryman, A. J., Crockford, N., Jansen, J. J. F. J. & Bond, A. L. submitted. Global extinction of Slender-billed Curlew Numenius tenuirostris. IbisGoogle Scholar

    13.

    Burgio, K. R., Carlson, C. J. & Tingley, M. W. 2017. Lazarus ecology: recovering the distribution and migratory patterns of the extinct Carolina parakeet. Ecol. Evol. 7: 5467–5475. Google Scholar

    14.

    Burgio, K. R., Carlson, C. J. & Bond, A. L. 2018. Georeferenced sighting and specimen occurrence data of the extinct Carolina Parakeet (Conuropsis carolinensis) from 1564 - 1944. Biodivers. Data J. 6: e25280. Google Scholar

    15.

    Butchart, S. H. M., Stattersfield, A. J. & Brooks, T. M. 2006. Going or gone: defining ‘Possibly Extinct’ species to give a truer picture of recent extinctions. Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 126A: 7–24. Google Scholar

    16.

    Butchart, S. H. M., Lowe, S., Martin, R. W., Symes, A., Westrip, J. R. S. & Wheatley, H. 2018. Which bird species have gone extinct? A novel quantitative classification approach. Biol. Conserv. 227: 9–18. Google Scholar

    17.

    Canivet, E. 1843. Catalogue des oiseaux du Département de la Manche. Emmanuel Canivet, Paris. Google Scholar

    18.

    Casas-Marce, M., Revilla, E., Fernandes, M., Rodríguez, A., Delibes, M. & Godoy, J. A. 2012. The value of hidden scientific resources: preserved animal specimens from private collections and small museums. BioScience 62: 1077–1082. Google Scholar

    19.

    Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., Barnosky, A. D., García, A., Pringle, R. M. & Palmer, T. M. 2015. Accelerated modern human-induced species losses: entering the sixth mass extinction. Sci. Advances 1(5): e1400253. Google Scholar

    20.

    Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R. & Dirzo, R. 2017. Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114(30): E6089. Google Scholar

    21.

    Collar, N. J. & Stuart, S. N. 1985. Threatened birds of Africa and related islands. International Council for Bird Preservation, Cambridge, UK. Google Scholar

    22.

    Collar, N. J., Gonzaga, L. P., Krabbe, N., Madroño, A., Naranjo, L. G., Parker, T. A. & Wege, D. C. 1992. Threatened birds of the Americas. International Council for Bird Preservation, Cambridge, UK. Google Scholar

    23.

    Collins, M. D. 2011. Putative audio recordings of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis). J. Acoustic Soc. Amer. 129: 1626–1630. Google Scholar

    24.

    Cooke, R., Sayol, F., Andermann, T., Blackburn, T. M., Steinbauer, M. J., Antonelli, A. & Faurby, S. 2023. Undiscovered bird extinctions obscure the true magnitude of human-driven extinction waves. Nature Comm. 14(1): 8116. Google Scholar

    25.

    Cooper, J. H. & Adams, M. P. 2005. Extinct and endangered bird collections: managing the risk. Zool. Med. Leiden 79: 123–130. Google Scholar

    26.

    Dalton, R. 2010. Still looking for that woodpecker. Nature 463(7282): 718–719. Google Scholar

    27.

    Degland, C.-D. 1849. Ornithologie européenne, ou Catalogue analytique et raisonné des oiseux observés en Europe , vol. 2. Librairie encyclopédique de Roret, Paris. Google Scholar

    28.

    Duchaussoy, H. 1898. Le Grand Pingouin du Muséum d'Histoire naturelle d'Amiens. Mém. Soc. Linn. N. Fr. 9: 88–126. Google Scholar

    29.

    Eaton, J. A., van Balen, B., Brickle, N. W. & Rheindt, F. E. 2021. Birds of the Indonesian Archipelago: Greater Sundas and Wallacea. Second edn. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

    30.

    Feigin, C. Y., Newton, A. H., Doronina, L., Schmitz, J., Hipsley, C. A., Mitchell, K. J., Gower, G., Llamas, B., Soubrier, J., Heider, T. N., Menzies, B. R., Cooper, A., O'Neill, R. J. & Pask, A. J. 2018. Genome of the Tasmanian tiger provides insights into the evolution and demography of an extinct marsupial carnivore. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2: 182–192. Google Scholar

    31.

    Fisher, C. T. 1981. Specimens of extinct, endangered or rare birds in the Merseyside County Museums, Liverpool. Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 101: 276–285. Google Scholar

    32.

    Fitzpatrick, J. W., Lammertink, M., Luneau, M. D., Gallagher, T. W., Harrison, B. R., Sparling, G. M., Rosenberg, K. V., Rohrbaugh, R. W., Swarthout, E. C. H., Wrege, P. H., Swarthout, S. B., Dantzker, M. S., Charif, R. A., Barksdale, T. R., Remsen, J. V., Simon, S. D. & Zollner, D. 2005. Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis) persists in continental North America. Science 308: 1460–1462. Google Scholar

    33.

    Forbes, H. O. & Robinson, H. C. 1897. Catalogue of the parrots (Psittaci) in the Derby Museum. Bull. Liverpool Mus. 1: 5–22. Google Scholar

    34.

    Forbes, H. O. & Robinson, H. C. 1898. Catalogue of the cuckoos and plantain-eaters (Cuculi) in the Derby Museum. Bull. Liverpool Mus. 1: 37–48. Google Scholar

    35.

    Fuller, E. 1987. Extinct birds. Viking/Rainbird, London. Google Scholar

    36.

    Fuller, E. 1999. The Great Auk. Harry N. Abrams, Southborough. Google Scholar

    37.

    Fuller, E. 2000. Extinct birds. Oxford Univ. Press. Google Scholar

    38.

    Gadeau de Kerville, H. 1892. Faune de la Normandie. Fascicule III. Oiseaux: (Pigeons, Gallinacés, Echassiers et Palmipèdes). Bull. Soc. amis Sci. Nat. Rouen 27: 201–583. Google Scholar

    39.

    Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, I. 1829. Catalogue des Mammifères et des Oiseaux rapportés par MM. Quoy et Quaimard, médecins et naturalistes de l'expédition de l'Astrolabe. Fait au Muséum le 25 mai 1829. MNHN, Laboratoire Mammifères et Oiseaux, Ms 2223, folios 248–256 [see number 153, M(artin). de Guam, a(lcedo). ruficep]. Google Scholar

    40.

    Gill, F., Donkser, D. & Rasmussen, P. (eds.) 2024. IOC world bird list (v14.1). https://doi.org/10.14344/ioc.ml.14.1Google Scholar

    41.

    Gouraud, C. 2014a. Extinct and endangered species and subspecies of birds in the Baillon Collection, La Châtre, France. Pp. 29–38 in Mlíkovský, J. (ed.) Proc. 8th Meet. European Bird Curators. J. Natl. Mus. (Prague), Nat. Hist. Ser. 183. Google Scholar

    42.

    Gouraud, C. 2014b. Eighteenth century bird specimens in the Baillon Collection, La Châtre, France. Pp. 19–28 in Mlíkovský, J. (ed.) Proc. 8th Meet. European Bird Curators. J. Natl. Mus. (Prague), Nat. Hist. Ser. 183. Google Scholar

    43.

    Gouraud, C. 2015. List of type specimens of birds in the Baillon Collection (La Châtre, France). Part 1. Non-Passerines. Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 135: 131–153. Google Scholar

    44.

    Gouraud, C. 2021. Extinct and endangered (‘E&E’) birds in the ornithological collections of the Musée de la Vallée, Barcelonnette, France, with comments on a Siberian Crane Leucogeranus leucogeranus egg. Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 141: 314–326. Google Scholar

    45.

    Gouraud, C. 2023. Rapport de mission. Inventaire de la collection ornithologique ‘Duchesne de Lamotte.’ Le Beffroi Musée Boucher de Perthes - Manessier, Abbeville, France. [Unpublished, copy available at the Abbeville Museum and from CG, on request.] Google Scholar

    46.

    Gouraud, C. & Absalon, P. 2023. List of type specimens of birds in the ornithological collection of Le Beffroi Musée Boucher de Perthes – Manessier (Abbeville, France). Avian Syst. 2: 9–43. Google Scholar

    47.

    Greenway, J. C. 1958. Extinct and vanishing birds of the world . American Committee for International Wild Life Protection, New York. Google Scholar

    48.

    Greenway, J. C. 1967. Extinct and vanishing birds of the world. Second revised edn. Dover Publications, New York. Google Scholar

    49.

    Gurney, J. H. 1854. Note on Nestor productus, the extinct parrot of Philip Island. The Zoologist 12: 4298. Google Scholar

    50.

    Hahn, P. 1963. Where is that vanished bird: an index to the known specimens of extinct and near extinct North American species. Royal Ontario Museum & Univ. of Toronto Press, Toronto. Google Scholar

    51.

    Heine, F. & Reichenow, A. 1890. Nomenclator Musei Heineani Ornithologici. Verzeichniss der Vogel Sammlung des Königlichen Oberamtmanns Ferdinand Heine. R. Friedländer & Sohn, Berlin. Google Scholar

    52.

    Hill, G. E., Mennill, D. J., Rolek, B. W., Hicks, T. L. & Swiston, K. A. 2006. Evidence suggesting that Ivory-billed Woodpeckers (Campephilus principalis) exist in Florida. Avian Conserv. & Ecol. 1(3): 2. Google Scholar

    53.

    Holmes, M. W., Hammond, T. T., Wogan, G. O. U., Walsh, R. E., La Barbera, K., Wommack, E. A., Martins, F. M., Crawford, J. C., Mack, K. L., Bloch, L. M. & Nachman, M. W. 2016. Natural history collections as windows on evolutionary processes. Mol. Ecol. 25: 864–881. Google Scholar

    54.

    del Hoyo, J. & Collar, N. J. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International illustrated checklist of the birds of the world , vol. 1. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

    55.

    del Hoyo, J. & Collar, N. J. 2016. HBW and BirdLife International illustrated checklist of the birds of the world , vol. 2. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

    56.

    Hume, J. P. & Walters, M. 2012. Extinct birds. T. & A. D. Poyser, London. Google Scholar

    57.

    Hume, J. P. 2017. Extinct birds. Second edn. Helm, London. Google Scholar

    58.

    Ingersoll, A. W. & Fisher, C. T. 2006. Type specimens of birds in the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.  https://ansp.org/∼/media/Files/ans/research/sys-ornithology/ANSP_typelist_v1.ashx(accessed 18 October 2023). Google Scholar

    59.

    Isaac, N. J. B., Turvey, S. T., Collen, B., Waterman, C. & Baillie, J. E. M. 2007. Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny. PLOS One 2(3): e296. Google Scholar

    60.

    International Commission for Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) 1999. International code of zoological nomenclature. Fourth edn. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London. Google Scholar

    61.

    IUCN. 2023. The IUCN Red List of threatened species. Version 2023-1.  https://www.iucnredlist.org(accessed 21 December 2023). Google Scholar

    62.

    Jetz, W., Thomas, G. H., Joy, J. B., Redding, D. W., Hartmann, K. & Mooers, A. O. 2014. Global distribution and conservation of evolutionary distinctness in birds. Curr. Biol. 24: 919–930. Google Scholar

    63.

    Jouanin, C. 1962. Inventaire des oiseaux éteints ou en voie d'extinction conservés au Muséum de Paris. Terre et Vie 3: 257–301. Google Scholar

    64.

    Kirkconnell, A., Kirwan, G. M., Garrido, O. H., Mitchell, A. D. & Wiley, J. W. 2020. The birds of Cuba: an annotated checklist. BOC Checklist Series 26. British Ornithologists' Club, Tring. Google Scholar

    65.

    Kirwan, G. M. & Green, G. 2011. Cotingas and manakins. Christopher Helm, London. Google Scholar

    66.

    Knox, A. G. & Walters, M. P. 1994. Extinct and endangered birds in the collections of the Natural History Museum . Occ. Publ. 1. British Ornithologists' Club, Tring. Google Scholar

    67.

    Kolbert, E. 2014. The sixth extinction: an unnatural history. Bloomsbury, London. Google Scholar

    68.

    Labitte, P. 1869. Mémoire sur la bibliothèque et les musées d'Abbeville. J. Gamain, Abbeville. Google Scholar

    69.

    Latta, S. C., Michaels, M. A., Michot, T. C., Shrum, P. L., Johnson, P., Tischendorf, J., Weeks, M., Trochet, J., Scheifler, D. & Ford, B. 2023. Multiple lines of evidence suggest the persistence of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis) in Louisiana. Ecol. Evol. 13: e10017. Google Scholar

    70.

    Leese, B. E., Johannessen, L. E., Schrøder-Nielsen, A., Mlíkovský, J., Gorney, D., Schreffler, L. & Schreffler, J. 2022. Additions and updates to the list of specimens of Imperial Woodpecker Campephilus imperialis (Gould, 1832), including genetic analysis of a putative clutch of eggs. Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 142: 491–508. Google Scholar

    71.

    Luther, D. 1996. Die ausgestorbenen Vögel der Welt. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg. Google Scholar

    72.

    Lynch, M. 2011. Credibility, evidence, and discovery: the case of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker. Ethnogr. Stud. 12: 78–105. Google Scholar

    73.

    Mace, G. M., Collar, N. J., Gaston, K. J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Akçakaya, H. R., Leader-Williams, N., Milner-Gulland, E. J. & Stuart, S. N. 2008. Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN's system for classifying threatened species. Conserv. Biol. 22: 1424–1442. Google Scholar

    74.

    Maciet, É. 1846. Catalogue de la magnifique collection d'oiseaux de M. le Prince d'Essling, duc de Rivoli, dont la vente aura lieu aux enchères publiques dans sa galerie, rue de Lille 98, le 8 Juin 1846 jusqu'au 25 du même mois et jours suivants, s'il y a lieu, à midi précis. Imprimerie Schneider et Langrand, Paris. Google Scholar

    75.

    Marcotte, F. 1861. Les animaux vertébrés de l'Arrondissement d'Abbeville. Mém. Soc. Imp. Émul. Abb. 9: 217–470. Google Scholar

    76.

    Mearns, B. & Mearns, R. 2022. Biographies for birdwatchers. the lives of those commemorated in Western Palearctic bird names, vol. 1. Privately published, Dumfries. Google Scholar

    77.

    Meineke, E. K., Davies, T. J., Daru, B. H. & Davis, C. C. 2019. Biological collections for understanding biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 374(1763): 20170386. Google Scholar

    78.

    von Mertens, R. & Steinbacher, J. 1955. Die im Senckenberg-Museum vorhandenen Arten ausgestorbener, aussterbender oder seltener Vögel. Senck. Biol. 36: 241–265. Google Scholar

    79.

    Meyer de Schauensee, R. 1941. Rare and extinct birds in the collections of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 93: 281–324. Google Scholar

    80.

    van der Mije, S. D., Kamminga, P. & Dekker, R. W. R. J. 2023. Type specimens of non-passerines in Naturalis Biodiversity Center (Animalia, Aves). ZooKeys 1155: 1–311. Google Scholar

    81.

    Mlíkovský, J. 2012. Extinct and nearly extinct birds in the collections of the National Museum, Prague, Czech Republic. J. Natl. Mus., Nat. Hist. Ser. 181: 95–123. Google Scholar

    82.

    Morgan, P. J. 1975. A catalogued specimen of Coua delalandei (Temminck) (Cuculidae) in Merseyside County Museums, Liverpool. Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 95: 62–64. Google Scholar

    83.

    Myers, C. W. 2012. Prince Maximilian zu Wied: a military man turned naturalist. Pp. 84–87 in Baione, T. (ed.) Natural histories: extraordinary rare book selections from the American Museum of Natural History library. Sterling Publishing, New York. Google Scholar

    84.

    Newton, A. 1861. Abstract of Mr. J. Wolley's researches in Iceland respecting the Gare-fowl or Great Auk (Alca impennis, Linn.). Ibis (1)4: 374–399. Google Scholar

    85.

    Nicolai, B. 1993. Dünnschnabelnestor, Nestor productus (Gould 1836), in der Sammlung des Heineanums. Orn. Jber. Mus. Heineanum 11: 113–116. Google Scholar

    86.

    Norris, K., Bond, A. L., Cooper, J. H., Adams, M. P., van Grouw, H., White, J., Stervander, M., Russell, D. G. D. & Loader, S. P. 2024. Unlocking avian museum collections to enable and advance environmental change research. Ibis 166: 315–322. Google Scholar

    87.

    Oswald, J. A., Smith, B. T., Allen, J. M., Guralnick, R. P., Steadman, D. W. & LeFebvre, M. J. 2023. Changes in parrot diversity after human arrival to the Caribbean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120: e2301128120. Google Scholar

    88.

    Palacio, R. D. 2023. A reappraisal of the distribution of the Yellow-headed Manakin (Chloropipo flavicapilla) in Colombia and Ecuador. Orn. Colombiana 23: 31–37. Google Scholar

    89.

    Pons, J.-M. & La CAF. 2020. Le Grand Pingouin Pinguinus impennis en France au XIXe siècle. Ornithos 27: 289–292. Google Scholar

    90.

    Prŷs-Jones, R. P. 2011. Type specimens of the Imperial Woodpecker Campephilus imperialis (Gould, 1832). Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 131: 256–260. Google Scholar

    91.

    Quaisser, C. & Nicolai, B. 2006. Typusexemplare der Vogelsammlung im Museum Heineanum Halberstadt. Abh. Ber. Mus. Heineanum Halberstadt 7(Sonderheft2): 1–105. Google Scholar

    92.

    Roncaglia, F. 2015. Que reste-t-il du grand pingouin ? Les spécimens naturalisés de l'espace francophone. Espèces 16: 20–27. Google Scholar

    93.

    Roselaar, C. S. 2003. An inventory of major European bird collections. Pp. 253–337 in Collar, N., Fisher, C. & Feare, C. (eds.) Why museums matter: avian archives in an age of extinction. Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 123A. Google Scholar

    94.

    Rothschild, W. 1907. Extinct birds . Hutchinson, London. Google Scholar

    95.

    Scheffers, B. R., Yong, D. L., Harris, J. B. C., Giam, X. & Sodhi, N. S. 2011. The world's rediscovered species: back from the brink? PLoS One 6(7): e22531. Google Scholar

    96.

    Schifter, H. 1973. A specimen of Coua delalandei (Temminck) (Cuculidae) in the Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna (Austria). Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 93: 2–3. Google Scholar

    97.

    Schifter, H., Bauernfeind, E. & Schifter, T. 2007. Die Typen der Vogelsammlung des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien. Teil I. Nonpasseres. Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien. Google Scholar

    98.

    Sibley, C. G. & Monroe, B. L. 1990. Distribution and taxonomy of birds of the world. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT. Google Scholar

    99.

    Snyder, N. F. 2004. The Carolina Parakeet: glimpses of a vanished bird. Princeton Univ. Press. Google Scholar

    100.

    Snyder, N. F. & Russell, K. 2020. Carolina Parakeet (Conuropsis carolinensis), version 1.0. In Poole, A. F. & Gill, F. B. (eds.) Birds of the world . Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY.  https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.carpar.01(accessed 21 December 2023). Google Scholar

    101.

    Steinheimer, F. D. 2003. Bamberg's Natural History Museum – the scientific significance of small collections. Bonn. Zool. Beitr. 51: 141–146. Google Scholar

    102.

    Steinheimer, F. D. 2005. The whereabouts of pre-nineteenth century bird specimens. Zool. Med. Leiden 79: 45–67. Google Scholar

    103.

    Stone, W. 1899. A study of the type specimens of birds in the collection of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, with a brief history of the collection. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 51: 5–62. Google Scholar

    104.

    Szabo, J. K., Khwaja, N., Garnett, S. T. & Butchart, S. H. M. 2012. Global patterns and drivers of avian extinctions at the species and subspecies level. PLoS One 7(10): e47080. Google Scholar

    105.

    Vimpère, J. 2019. Charles Payraudeau (1798-1865). Vie et œuvre scientifique. Vendée Impress'Yon, La Roche-surYon. Google Scholar

    106.

    Vincent, T. 1999. Josse Hardy (1798–1863), ornithologue dieppois: parcours d'un amateur et devenir des collections. Pp. 239–253 in Mécènes et collectionneurs (eds.) Les variantes d'une passion, vol. 1. 121ème congrès national des Sociétés historiques et scientifiques, Nice, 26–31 octobre 1996, Section d'histoire moderne et contemporaine et d'archéologie et d'histoire de l'art. Google Scholar

    107.

    Violani, C., Daturi, A. & Cagnolaro, L. 1984. Uccelli estinti e rari nei musei naturalistici di Milano, Genova e Firenze. Riv. Ital. Orn. 54: 105–178. Google Scholar

    108.

    Voisin, C. & Voisin, J.-F. 1991. Sur quelques spécimens remarquables de la collection d'oiseaux du Musée Boucher de Perthes d'Abbeville. Bull. Soc. Emul. Hist. Litt. Abbeville 27: 105–114. Google Scholar

    109.

    Voisin, C. & Voisin, J.-F. 1999. Liste des types d'oiseaux des collections du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle de Paris. 6. Coucous (Cuculidés). Zoosystema 21: 379–402. Google Scholar

    110.

    Warren, R. L. M. 1966. Type-specimens of birds in the British Museum (Natural History), vol. 1. Trustees of the British Museum, London. Google Scholar

    111.

    Watson, P. 2011. Birmingham ornithology collections. Part 5 - The collection of foreign birds (Version1.0).  https://web.archive.org/web/20130805021455/ http://www.bmag.org.uk/uploads/fck/file/Foreign%20Birds.pdf_(accessed 19 October 2023) Google Scholar

    112.

    Woog, F. 2005. Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart: Entdeckungsreise in eine Vogelsammlung. Der Falke 52: 288–292. Google Scholar

    Notes

    [1] 1 Several authors have attempted to determine when and on what evidence a species should be declared extinct, see e.g. Butchart et al. (2006, 2018) and Mace et al. (2008).

    [2] 2 Labitte (1869: 17) listed a total of 112,656 items in this category.

    [3] 3 To avoid any risk of deterioration or loss, these labels were systematically detached from the specimens, clearly noting on them the inventory number of the corresponding specimen, and placed individually in plastic bags that are stored separately in a box.

    [4] 4 Numbers of specimens in VertNet and GBIF can include eggs and/or tissues, as well as duplicates. Therefore, the real number of mounted specimens or skins can be less than that reported herein. This can also help explain the sometimes fairly significant differences between GBIF and VertNet totals.

    [5] 5 The species epithet sandwicensis (or sandwichensis) is sometimes used for animals believed to come from Hawaii. It refers to the Sandwich Islands, the name used for the Hawaii archipelago prior to the 1840s.

    [6] 6 Naturalis Bioportal:  https://bioportal.naturalis.nl/en/specimen/RMNH.AVES.110100 (accessed 13 December 2023).

    [7] 7 Jacques Josse Hardy (1798–1863) was a merchant and shipowner in Dieppe, Normandy, France. From 1821, he began to mount the birds he collected and expanded his collection with specimens from other hunters and fishermen. After 40 years, his collection numbered 1,253 birds and 2,210 eggs (Bouteiller 1878: 423–424, Vincent 1999).

    [8] 8 The pharmacist René Moynier de Villepoix (1851–1934) became curator of Abbeville Museum in 1884 (P. Absalon in litt. 14 March 2023).

    [9] 9 See printed note entitled ‘LE GRAND PINGOUIN du Musée d’Abbeville’ dated 1898 and signed ‘H. Duchaussoy, Membre de la Société Linéenne du Nord de la France’ (Archives of the Abbeville Museum).

    [10] 10 Stone (1899) designated the unique specimen in ANSP as the ‘type’ of this taxon, which act can be considered a lectotypification under the ICZN Code (1999, Art. 74.6); although Gould’s original description was potentially based on a single specimen, his text is not unambiguous on this point.

    [11] 11 Quiscalus tenuirostris Swainson, 1838, is a junior synonym of Scaphidurus palustris Swainson, 1827.

    [12] 12 Accessed 18 October 2023.

    [13] 13 Not including the specimen in Châteaudun (A. Rodriguez in litt. 2023) or the three specimens housed in La Chaize-le-Vicomte (Vimpère 2019: 431).

    [14] 14 Moreover, Jules Duchesne de Lamotte travelled to London sometime between 1829 and 1839 (Gouraud & Absalon 2023), during which period Gould was selling specimens (K. Clark in litt. 2024). Other Gould specimens have also been identified in the Abbeville collection (Gouraud & Absalon 2023).

    [15] 15 MNHN database ( https://science.mnhn.fr/institution/mnhn/search), accessed 13 January 2024.

    [16] 16 Other world lists place this family either in the Apodiformes (e.g. Gill et al. 2024) or in its own order, Trochiliformes (e.g. Sibley & Monroe 1990).

    [17] 17 Myers (2012) suggested that the name Wied should have preference over Wied-Neuwied.

    [18] 18 MNHN database ( https://science.mnhn.fr/institution/mnhn/search), accessed 12 January 2024.

    [19] 19 Data retrieved from Catalogue of birds in the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH), see entries 564459 and 564460, and JJFJ (pers. obs.).

    Christophe Gouraud and Justin J. F. J. Jansen "Extinct and endangered (‘E&E’) birds in the ornithological collection of Le Beffroi Musée Boucher de Perthes-Manessier, Abbeville, France," Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club 144(3), 244-268, (2 September 2024). https://doi.org/10.25226/bboc.v144i3.2024.a6
    Received: 25 February 2024; Published: 2 September 2024
    Back to Top