Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
25 September 2023 Crop wild relatives: the road to climate change adaptation
Mohd Kamran Khan, Anamika Pandey, Mehmet Hamurcu, Om Prakash Gupta, Akbar Hossain
Author Affiliations +

The world population is projected to be 9.7 billion in 2050 (Khan et al. 2020). Accordingly, to fulfil the expected rise in global food demand, the agricultural production must increase by around 60–70% by 2050. However, there are a number of factors such as reduced crop diversity, biotic and abiotic stresses along with drastic climate change that are very likely to affect crop productivity (Rajpal et al. 2023). In 21st century, the increase in the level of environmental stresses with the ongoing climate change is already predicted in global climate forecasts. Thus, the production of resilient genotypes can help to lessen the consequences of such global climate change. The genetic diversity of contemporary cultivars has, however, been reduced as a result of domestication and targeted trait selection. Hence, it is necessary to identify novel genetic resources to promote adaptability to the ongoing and expected environmental issues.

Crop wild relatives (CWRs) are crucial genetic resources with rare alleles and expanded genetic diversity that can help to improve crop adaptability to different stress conditions associated with continuously changing climate (Kahraman et al. 2017; Khan et al. 2021). Thus, it is essential to conserve as well as use these genetic resources effectively in order to generate climate-resilient crops and to guarantee global food and nutrition security. However, the heritable characteristics of CWRs have not been thoroughly explored and should be studied in detail for the efficient usage of CWRs. It is necessary to analyse their nutritional content, genetic variation, tolerance towards different environmental constraints, and productivity in the scenario of climate change (Athar et al. 2023). Thus, this special issue presents the studies highlighting the successful utilisation of CWRs for modern agricultural development. The special issue comprises eight research and five review articles that emphasise different beneficial aspects of CWRs.

Some of the CWRs survive in extreme environments and can be efficiently used to increase the adaptability of modern genotypes to such environments. Higher genetic improvements can be achieved by integrating desirable genes from wild/relative species into the gene pools of major food crops. Identification of QTLs related to micronutrients and grain yield facilitates marker-assisted breeding for the development of new varieties. Curti et al. (2022) characterised the wild ancestor of quinoa populations (Chenopodium hircinum Schard.) that can survive in the hottest environments to quantify the variations among sites of origin. The results revealed that late-flowering wild quinoa populations could survive in hot climate; thus, longer vegetative growth can be a beneficial trait to develop Chenopodium spp. with heat stress tolerance. Bharamappanavara et al. (2023) determined genomic regions related to yield traits in mapping populations obtained from backcrossing of Oryza sativa indica and O. glaberrima. The authors reported a QTL hotspot near marker RM510, and a QTL qGY-4.1 that is associated with grain yield and can be used for increasing yield in O. sativa cultivars via molecular breeding. Duan et al. (2022) identified 16 QTLs related to grain zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn) and copper (Cu) contents, and 29 QTLs associated with other grain-related traits in the backcross inbred lines (BIL) developed from an interspecific backcross of Xieqingzao B and Dongxiang wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.). Pyramiding of such QTLs can be done to simultaneously improve these traits in modern rice cultivars.

An efficient breeding plan can be established for different crops by utilising their variability in yield and related traits. Chokheli et al. (2022) estimated the genetic polymorphism of five rare species of the genus Crambe and established a genetic formula to identify these species. Among the five studied species, Crambe steveniana and Crambe tataria were closely related. Naik et al. (2022) identified significant variation in germplasm lines of under-utilised pseudocereal buckwheat grown in different locations of the northwestern Himalayan region. Among all the studied traits, number of primary branches showed the highest phenotypic coefficients of variation. Similarly, Soni and Munjal (2023) estimated heat stress tolerance of different wheat genetic resources including wild germplasm employing the stay-green trait. Interestingly, genotypes with stay-green trait were grouped together with genotypes with high grain yield and low leaf senescence rate and several genotypes were identified as potential candidates for breeding for heat stress tolerance.

Joshi et al. (2023) characterised several chickpea accessions at the seedling establishment stage and revealed novel salinity-tolerant genetic resources. Identifying the tolerance level of genetic resources at seedling stage can enable the early selection of appropriate donors and recipients for breeding programs. Genetic resources can be effective source of tolerance to not just individual stresses but combined stresses as well (Pandey et al. 2023). Salinity and alkalinity often exist as combined stresses in agricultural fields all around the world. Screening of seedling growth attributes revealed significant variation in 105 Avena accessions grown under combined salinity and alkalinity stress. Seedling vigor index and final germination percentage were positively correlated in the studied genotypes. Genotypes IG-20-477, OS-377, IG-20-798, and IG-20-575 were suggested to be appropriate donors for developing tolerance to high saline-alkaline stress according to the measured stress tolerance index based on multiple traits (Ahmed et al. 2023).

The review articles in this issue focused on diverse aspects related to the deployment of wild genetic resources of different species. During evolution, plants developed adaptive characteristics via the process of natural selection. The artificial selection by humans during the domestication process expedited the process of integrating desirable traits. However, it led to loss of several adaptive and crucial traits that are required for survival in natural growth conditions. Pod shattering is one of those traits that the ancient selection process was focused on minimising (Ogutcen et al. 2018). Although the selection process has largely reduced shattering in crops, it is still a cause of large losses in several crops. Sofi et al. (2022) presented a review with in-depth understandings of evolutionary relevance, mechanical features, and genomic and genetic resources for pod shattering with particular reference to common bean. Wild bananas with greater resistance to different biotic and abiotic stresses have been under-explored until date. Panwar et al. (2022) provided the first detailed review on the deployment of banana wild relatives and their related germplasm for the improvement of biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in modern cultivars, with a specific emphasis on Fusarium wilt, Black Sigatoka, and viral diseases in cultivated bananas. Utilisation of wild genotypes for abiotic stresses such as drought and salinity has also been discussed. With untapped genetic diversity, banana genetic resources could be utilised for fibre, forage, medicines and food.

Naikawadi et al. (2022) provided a comprehensive review on Ensete species that possess several cosmeceuticals, nutraceuticals, and bioactive compounds other than being a staple food source. The authors presented a systematic analysis of their conservation and domestication, and agronomic, medicinal and nutritional traits. In another review, Sood et al. (2022) highlighted the need for successful utilisation of wild oat species for the nutritional improvement of cultivated oat (Avena sativa). Different wild forms of oats have been reported to have higher quality, protein, β-glucan, starch, and other metabolic and nutritional components along with tolerance to several biotic and abiotic stresses. Several approaches such as conventional breeding and molecular strategies including genetic engineering, QTL mapping, genomic selection, and speed breeding have been discussed.

Wild relatives not only have the importance for the development of food crops, but also hold significant potential for the improvement of forage crops. In a review, Indu et al. (2022) emphasised the adaptive mechanism of wild relatives of forage crops to changing climate. Other than discussing the biotechnological strategies, authors appraised the cutting-edge breeding tools that can be used in the upcoming stress breeding programmes for establishing climate resilient forage crops.

This special issue may serve as a baseline source to assist improvement of different crops via involvement of CWRs and may enhance global awareness towards the existence of potential CWRs and their adaptive features under stress conditions.

Conflicts of interest

The authors are the Guest Editors of the ‘Crop Wild Relatives: The Road to Climate Change Adaptation’ special issue of Crop & Pasture Science. To mitigate this potential conflicts of interest they were blinded from the review process.

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing.

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ( CC BY-NC-ND)

References

1.

Ahmed S, Patel R, Singhal RK, Kumar N, Rana M, Indu I, Chand S, Chandra A (2023) Salinity, alkalinity and their combined stress effects on germination and seedling growth attributes in oats (Avena sativa). Crop & Pasture Science 74, 1094–1102. https://doi.org/10.1071/cp22322 Google Scholar

2.

Athar T, Pandey A, Khan MK, Hamurcu M, Rustagi A, Gezgin S, Singhal RK, Yousaf H (2023) Chapter 26 – Climate change triggering abiotic stresses and losses in wheat production and quality. In‘Abiotic stresses in wheat’. (Eds MK Khan, A Pandey, M Hamurcu, OP Gupta, S Gezgin) pp. 413–425. (Academic Press) Google Scholar

3.

Bharamappanavara M, Chikkahosahalli MA, Patil BS, Vijjeswarapu A, Anantha MS, Ramappa L, Diwan J, Nidagundi JM, Mathada UR, Talagunda SC, Guddalahalli LY, Byanna R, Rathod S, Sundaram RM, Subbarao LV, Rapolu MK, Gireesh C (2023) Genetic analysis and identification of QTLs associated with yield-enhancing traits in Oryza sativa IR64 × Oryza glaberrima interspecific backcross populations. Crop & Pasture Science 74, 1023–1036. https://doi.org/10.1071/cp22105 Google Scholar

4.

Chokheli VA, Shmaraeva AN, Kornienko IV, Stepanenko VV, Rajput VD, Singh A, Kumari A, Dmitriev PA, Azarov AS, Minkina TM, Varduni TV (2022) Assessment of genetic diversity and DNA fingerprinting of rare species of the genus Crambe (Brassicaceae). Crop & Pasture Science 74, 1014–1022. https://doi.org/10.1071/cp22027 Google Scholar

5.

Curti RN, Ortega-Baes P, Ratto S, Bertero D (2022) Harnessing phenological traits of wild ancestor Chenopodium hircinum to improve climate adaptation of quinoa. Crop & Pasture Science 74, 1058–1068. https://doi.org/10.1071/cp22187 Google Scholar

6.

Duan L, Wu T, Li X, Huang D, Li X, Wen X, Chen P, Xie J, Hu B (2022) QTL detection for grain yield and micro-nutrition contents in rice (Oryza sativa) using an interspecific backcross population derived from Dongxiang wild rice (Oryza rufipogon). Crop & Pasture Science 73(11), 1253–1263. https://doi.org/10.1071/cp22039 Google Scholar

7.

Indu I, Mehta BK, Shashikumara P, Gupta G, Dikshit N, Chand S, Yadav PK, Ahmed S, Singhal RK (2022) Forage crops: a repository of functional trait diversity for current and future climate adaptation. Crop & Pasture Science 74, 961–977. https://doi.org/10.1071/cp22200 Google Scholar

8.

Joshi N, Reddy SPP, Kumar N, Bharadwaj C, Tapan K, Patil BS, Jain PK, Nimmy MS, Roorkiwal M, Verma P, Varshney RK, Siddique KHM, Sudhir K (2023) Siphoning novel sources of seedling salinity tolerance from the diverse chickpea landraces. Crop & Pasture Science 74, 1080–1093. https://doi.org/10.1071/cp22319 Google Scholar

9.

Kahraman A, Pandey A, Khan MK, Lindsay D, Moenga S, Vance L, Bergmann E, Carrasquilla-Garcia N, Shin M-G, Chang PL, von Wettberg EJB, Tar'an B, Cook DR, Penmetsa RV (2017) Distinct subgroups of Cicer echinospermum are associated with hybrid sterility and breakdown in interspecific crosses with cultivated chickpea. Crop Science 57, 3101–3111. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2017.06.0335 Google Scholar

10.

Khan MK, Pandey A, Athar T, Choudhary S, Deval R, Gezgin S, Hamurcu M, Topal A, Atmaca E, Santos PA, Omay MR, Suslu H, Gulcan K, Inanc M, Akkaya MS, Kahraman A, Thomas G (2020) Fusarium head blight in wheat: contemporary status and molecular approaches. 3 Biotech 10, 172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-2158-x Google Scholar

11.

Khan MK, Pandey A, Hamurcu M, Avsaroglu ZZ, Ozbek M, Omay AH, Elbasan F, Omay MR, Gokmen F, Topal A, Gezgin S (2021) Variability in physiological traits reveals boron toxicity tolerance in Aegilops species. Frontiers in Plant Science 12, 736614. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.736614 Google Scholar

12.

Naik S, Mahajan R, Sofi PA, Abidi I, Ali G, Nehvi FA, Khan I, Bhat SA, Bhat MA, Bhat BA, DarF WA, Zargar SM (2022) Characterisation of buckwheat (Fagopyrum spp.) diversity of the northwestern Himalayas. Crop & Pasture Science 74, 1069–1079. https://doi.org/10.1071/cp22278 Google Scholar

13.

Naikawadi V, Devikar S, Shirke H, Naikawadi V, Suprassanna P, Nikam T (2022) Wild banana (genus Ensete) – an underutilised plant as source of food, fodder, fibre and medicine and need for biotechnological interventions. Crop & Pasture Science 74, 925–943. https://doi.org/10.1071/cp22079 Google Scholar

14.

Ogutcen E, Pandey A, Khan MK, Marques E, Penmetsa RV, Kahraman A, Von Wettberg EJB (2018) Pod shattering: a homologous series of variation underlying domestication and an avenue for crop improvement. Agronomy 8, 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8080137 Google Scholar

15.

Pandey A, Khan MK, Athar T, Hamurcu M, Germ M, Gezgin S (2023) Combined abiotic stresses in wheat species. In‘Abiotic stresses in wheat’. Ch. 17. (Eds MK Khan, A Pandey, M Hamurcu, OP Gupta, S Gezgin) pp. 273–282. (Academic Press) Google Scholar

16.

Panwar R, Chaudhry B, Kumar D, Prakash G, Khan MK, Pandey A, Hamurcu M, Rustagi A (2022) Harnessing stress-tolerant wild bananas for crop improvement. Crop & Pasture Science 74, 978–992. https://doi.org/10.1071/cp22294 Google Scholar

17.

Rajpal VR, Singh A, Kathpalia R, Thakur RK, Khan MK, Pandey A, Hamurcu M, Raina SN (2023) The prospects of gene introgression from crop wild relatives into cultivated lentil for climate change mitigation. Frontiers in Plant Science 14, 1127239. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls. 2023.1127239 Google Scholar

18.

Sofi PA, Mir RA, Bhat KA, Mir RR, Fatima S, Rani S, Mahajan R, Shafi S, Zaffar A, Ahmad R, Bhat MA, Zargar SM (2022) From domestication syndrome to breeding objective: insights into unwanted breakup in common beans to improve shattering. Crop & Pasture Science 74, 944–960. https://doi.org/10.1071/cp22130 Google Scholar

19.

Soni A, Munjal R (2023) Characterisation and evaluation of wheat genetic resources for heat stress tolerance using stay-green traits. Crop & Pasture Science 74, 1037–1057. https://doi.org/10.1071/cp22119 Google Scholar

20.

Sood VK, Sanadya SK, Kumar S, Chand S, Kapoor R (2022) Health benefits of oat (Avena sativa) and nutritional improvement through plant breeding interventions. Crop & Pasture Science 74, 993–1013. https://doi.org/10.1071/cp22268 Google Scholar
Mohd Kamran Khan, Anamika Pandey, Mehmet Hamurcu, Om Prakash Gupta, and Akbar Hossain "Crop wild relatives: the road to climate change adaptation," Crop and Pasture Science 74(11), i-iii, (25 September 2023). https://doi.org/10.1071/CP23253
Received: 4 September 2023; Accepted: 7 September 2023; Published: 25 September 2023
Back to Top