BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
23 February 2023 A New Species of Small Green Treefrog (Pelodryadidae: Litoria) from the Lakekamu Basin in Southern Papua New Guinea
Stephen J. Richards, David Bickford
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We describe a new species of very small (male body length 22.0–22.8 mm), green treefrog in the pelodryadid genus Litoria Tschudi from lowland rainforest on the southern margin of Papua New Guinea's central cordillera. The new species is morphologically most similar to Litoria leucova, a small green treefrog known only from the north-flowing Sepik River catchment in western Papua New Guinea. It differs from that species by having longer limbs (TL/SVL 0.56–0.60 vs. 0.53–0.55), a poorly defined (vs. prominent) tympanum, in having a distinct lemon yellow mid-lateral line, and in its unique advertisement call comprising a slowly repeated series of short clicks followed by a discrete group of pulses produced rapidly but with highly variable inter-pulse intervals. Although genetic data are not available, the new species' association with a fast-flowing rocky stream suggests that its relationships may lie with other torrent-dwelling Litoria species.

Introduction

Pelodryadid treefrogs form a conspicuous component of frog communities associated with water bodies across the lowlands and foothills of New Guinea (Menzies, 2006). However, the island's fauna remains incompletely documented and recent studies have revealed numerous undescribed pelodryadid species (Oliver et al., 2008, 2019). Among these are a number of primarily green species including large (SVL>60 mm) canopy-dwelling (Richards and Oliver, 2006; Richards et al., 2006; Kraus, 2018; Oliver et al., 2019) and small (SVL<30 mm) scansorial (Menzies et al., 2008) forms. Most species within the group are tightly affiliated with water bodies where they presumably lay eggs and their tadpoles develop.

Relationships among Australopapuan pelodryadid species remain unsettled (Duellman et al., 2016; Clulow and Swan, 2018; Dubois et al., 2021) and their resolution awaits publication of a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis. Small green pelodryadids in the Melanesian region include species that reproduce in temporary ponds and ditches in lowland savanna and forest habitats (e.g., relatives of Litoria bicolor (Gray, 1842); Menzies et al., 2008), species that occupy shallow seepages and slow-flowing streams in forest (e.g., Litoria wapogaensis Richards & Iskandar, 2001), and species that occupy fast-flowing mountain streams (e.g., Litoria bulmeri (Tyler, 1968) and L. leucova (Tyler, 1968); Tyler, 1968, Johnston and Richards, 1994).

Here we describe a new species of small green treefrog in the genus Litoria that was discovered during Conservation International's 1996 Rapid Assessment Program biodiversity survey of the Lakekamu Basin in southern Papua New Guinea (Allison et al., 1998). The new species is morphologically most similar to Litoria leucova and, like that species (Johnston and Richards, 1994), it occupies clear-flowing streams. However, genetic data are not available so its relationships within the genus cannot yet be determined. Based on the failure to detect the new species during extensive surveys of similar and suitable habitats in adjacent catchments (S. Richards, personal observation), we presume that this species may be endemic to a small portion of the island of New Guinea.

Materials and Methods

We located frogs using head torches and by tracking advertisement calls at night. We fixed voucher specimens in 10% formalin and stored them in 70% ethanol. We deposited preserved animals in the South Australian Museum, Adelaide, Australia (SAMA), and we will also repatriate one paratype to the Papua New Guinea National Museum (PNGNM). We made measurements following the methods, terminology, and abbreviations of Tyler (1968) to the nearest 0.1 mm with callipers (SVL: body length from snout to vent, TL: tibia length from heel to convex surface of flexed knee, HL: head length, from tip of snout to posterior margin of tympanum, HW: head width at widest point, normally across tympana) or a dissecting microscope fitted with an optical micrometer (all other measurements); EN: distance from anterior corner of eye to posterior margin of naris, IN: internarial distance, between medial margins of external nares, EYE: horizontal diameter of eye, TYM: horizontal diameter of tympanum including tympanic annulus (the tympanum of this species is poorly defined so measurements are approximate), 3FD: transverse diameter of disc of Finger 3, 3FP: transverse diameter of penultimate phalanx of Finger 3, 4TD: transverse diameter of disc of Toe 4 and 4TP: transverse diameter of penultimate phalanx of Toe 4.

We determined sex by examination of vocal slits and nuptial pads, and by observation of calling. We recorded calls using a Sony Professional Walkman recorder with an Electret ECM-Z200 Condenser Microphone. We analysed calls using Avisoft-SASLab Pro v4.34 ( http://www.avisoft.com/) following procedures and terminology recommended by Köhler et al. (2017). We calculated audiospectrograms with fast-Fourier transform (FFT) of 512 points, 50% overlap for long call series, and 256 points, 87.5% overlap for individual notes, using Hamming windows.

We examined comparative material at the Natural History Museum, London (BMNH), Naturalis, Leiden (RMNH), South Australian Museum, Adelaide (SAMA), Natural Sciences Resource Centre of the University of Papua New Guinea, Port Moresby (UP), Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Cibinong (MZB) and the Queensland Museum, Brisbane (QM). We extracted additional information for comparisons from published papers on the relevant groups (e.g., Tyler, 1968; Menzies et al., 2008). FN refers to original field collection numbers of S.J. Richards.

The new species described herein is assigned to the genus Litoria sensu Tyler and Davies (1978) based on having a horizontal pupil and lacking pigmentation on the nictitating membrane, pending a compelling phylogenetic based resolution of generic boundaries within Pelodryadidae.

Systematics

Litoria lakekamu sp. nov.
(English name: Lakekamu pygmy treefrog)

  • Diagnosis

  • The new species is distinguished from all other Litoria by the following unique combination of characters: size very small (SVL of four males 20.0–22.8 mm, females unknown); dorsum in life predominantly green; vomerine teeth absent; tympanum indistinct; finger webbing extensive, reaching distal edge of subarticular tubercle at base of penultimate phalanx on outer edge of Finger 3 and inner edge of Finger 4; finger discs slightly larger than or same size as toe discs; webbing on toes extending nearly to base of all discs except Toe 4 where it reaches midway between subarticular tubercle at base of penultimate phalanx and disc on both sides of digit; dermal fringes on limbs and below vent absent; pigmentation on nictitating membrane restricted to scattered flecks at dorsal margin; advertisement call a series of short (0.017–0.053 s) distinctly pulsed rasping notes repeated at 2.1–6.5 s intervals, followed by a discrete group of rapidly repeated pulses with highly variable inter-pulse intervals.

  • Etymology

  • The specific name lakekamu is a noun in apposition referring to the type and only known locality of this species.

  • Holotype

  • SAMA R70113 (FN: Biol Survey Field Series 11623), adult male, Sapoi River adjacent to Ivimka Research Station (7.735° S, 146.496° E; 120 m asl), Lakekamu Basin, Gulf Province, Papua New Guinea, collected by Stephen Richards, David Bickford, and Geordie Torr on 3 December 1996.

  • Paratypes

  • SAMA R70114 (FN: Biol Survey Field Series 11624), R70115 (FN: USNM 209310), PNGNM (FN: Biol Survey Field Series 11625), three adult males, same data as holotype.

  • Description of holotype

  • Adult male with vocal slits and small pale brown nuptial pads. Body slender, limbs moderately long (TL/SVL 0.56); head broad (HW/SVL 0.36), snout broadly rounded in dorsal aspect (Fig. 1A), blunt, near vertical, protruding marginally beyond lower jaw in lateral aspect; canthus rostralis broadly rounded, slightly curved; loreal region steep, slightly concave; nares round, near top of snout and closer to tip of snout than to eye, oriented anterolaterally, visible in dorsal aspect (Fig. 1A). Eyes large (EYE/SVL 0.15), clearly protruding in both dorsal and lateral aspects; constricted pupil horizontal. Pigmentation on nictitating membrane restricted to scattered flecks along dorsal edge of left membrane. Tympanum small (TYM/SVL<0.05), annulus poorly defined, bordered dorsally by broad, poorly defined supratympanic fold. Vomeropalatines absent; tongue not free posteriorly, broad, heart shaped with distinct notch in posterior edge; vocal slits long, located laterally on floor of mouth, extending from behind angle of jaws to about halfway between angle of jaws and front of mouth. Nuptial excrescences very pale brown, elongate, extending 1.7 mm along proximal outer edge of first finger.

  • Fingers with relative lengths 3>4>2>1, webbing extending beyond distal edge of subarticular tubercle at base of penultimate phalanx on Finger 4 (distal subarticular tubercle), and to about distal subarticular tubercle on outer edge of Finger 3 before continuing as broad flange to base of disc. Distal subarticular tubercles low, that on Finger 3 partially bifid; remainder unilobed. Small narrow inner, and broad but low outer, metacarpal tubercles present (Fig. 1B). Toes with relative lengths 4>5=3>2>1, webbing extending nearly to base of discs on Toe 3 and Toe 5, and to midway between distal subarticular tubercle and disc on both sides of Toe 4. Subarticular tubercles low, poorly defined. Inner metatarsal tubercle small, elongate, poorly defined; outer metatarsal tubercle not detectable (Fig 1B). Tips of fingers and toes expanded into terminal discs, those of fingers slightly broader than those of toes (4TD/3FD 0.92), all with distinct marginal grooves. A small puncture wound present in centre of each hand.

  • Skin with orange-peel texture dorsally and laterally, including head; dorsal surfaces of limbs with numerous low tubercles; ventral surfaces granular. Limbs without dermal ornamentation, heels without tubercles or dermal spikes, surfaces around vent without raised tubercles.

  • Colour of holotype in preservative

  • Dorsal surfaces of body uniform grey with scattered darker grey flecks; lemon-yellow lateral line in life has faded to white, ventral surfaces to off-white. Green spots on limbs in life (see below) are no longer evident while dense brown peppering has become more intense across all surfaces of limbs.

  • Colour of the new species in life

  • All specimens near-uniform green dorsally, white laterally and ventrally, with narrow but distinct lemon-yellow lateral stripe. The following extra details on colour in life are based on images of SAMA R70114 and PNGNM (FN 11625) taken in life shortly after capture (Fig. 2). Green dorsum of PNGNM (FN 11625) overlain with scattered small but distinct brown flecks, these less evident in SAMA R70114. Narrow lemon-yellow lateral line extends posteriorly from tip of snout along upper lip, below eye and tympanum continuing mid-laterally to groin, separating green of dorsum from white ventrolateral and ventral surfaces (Fig. 2). Limbs, including hidden surfaces of thighs, translucent with dense purplish-brown peppering, overlain on upper surfaces by lime green spots, these mostly restricted to surfaces of low tubercles. Green colour on arms restricted predominantly to areas below elbow; fingers, toes, and webbing translucent with scattered tiny purplish-brown spots. Iris creamy-white with scattered short veins of brown pigment, most dense in narrow rim around edge of pupil.

  • Variation

  • The type series is extremely uniform morphologically (Table 1). Body size of adult males 20.0–22.8 mm, females unknown. Dorsal colour consistently near uniform green in life, all specimens with lemon-yellow mid-lateral line. In preservative all specimens grey with fine darker grey flecks, variation restricted to degree of concentration of flecks into small blotches (small blotches most evident in PNGNM (FN 11625). Tongue nearly round in SAMA R70115 (vs. heart-shaped in holotype), nuptial pads of R70114–70115 present but barely detectable.

  • Distribution and natural history

  • Litoria lakekamu is to date known only from the Lakekamu Basin on the southern fringe of Papua New Guinea's central cordillera (Fig. 3). The type series was collected from vegetation adjacent to or overhanging the Sapoi River which at the type locality is a large, clear, rocky stream (Fig. 4) flowing through primary lowland forest. Other individuals were heard calling from about 10–15 m high in the lower canopy over the same stream.

  • Advertisement call

  • We recorded two complete call series produced by SAMA R70115 at a height of 3 m above the stream, and one series produced by an unvouchered animal at least 10 m high in a tree adjacent to the stream, all at an air temperature of 25.5°C. Litoria lakekamu produces two call types. Call type 1 is a single short, distinctly pulsed note repeated slowly in long series. This call type is here referred to as a short call. Call type 2 is longer than short calls and comprises a sequence of pulses produced at highly variable inter-pulse intervals resulting in the acoustic impression of a ‘spluttering’ sound. These calls do not contain clearly defined notes and are here referred to as long calls. Long calls always followed a series of short calls and, although sample size is small, additional calls with a similar structure were heard at the type locality. Detailed analysis is restricted to the call series produced by SAMA R70115 due to the poor quality of the unvouchered call.

  • The three recorded call series consisted of seven, eight and 11 short calls produced at intervals of 2.1–6.5 s (0.28–0.48 calls/s, n=3) (Fig. 5). Each series of short calls was followed by a single long call. Total lengths of the three call series (including long calls) were 21.5, 29.4, and 45.2 s. Short calls (=notes) in the series analysed in more detail were 0.017–0.053 s long (mean=0.033, SD=0.010, n=18), and contained 4–8 pulses (mean=5.7, SD=1.3, n=18) produced at a rate of 100–312 pulses/s (mean=164.2, SD=47.01, n=18). The two long calls of sufficient quality for detailed analysis were much longer than short calls, lasting 1.6 and 1.7 s. They contained 34 and 32 pulses, respectively, uttered at a rate of 18.8 and 21.3 pulses/s. However, pulse interval in the two long calls was extremely variable, ranging from 0.0003 to 0.17 s resulting in the acoustic impression of a rapid series of spluttering clicks. Dominant frequency of short calls was 3560–3860 kHz (mean=3714.4, SD=85.76, n=18), and that of the two long calls fell within this range (3759.5 and 3595 kHz). Fig. 5A illustrates a full call series and Fig. 5B–C illustrates the final short call and the following long call in that series, produced by SAMA R70115.

  • Comparisons

  • Litoria lakekamu sp. nov. is compared here with small (male SVL 20–30 mm), predominantly green New Guinean Litoria that are known or presumed to breed in lentic water bodies as follows: It differs from L. albolabris (Wandolleck, 1911) and L. mystax (Van Kampen, 1906), both from the northern lowlands of New Guinea, in having longer limbs (TL/SVL 0.56–0.59 vs. 0.50–0.55 in L. albolabris and 0.54 in L. mystax; Tyler, 1968), and in lacking (vs. having) a prominent, short white bar below the eye; from New Guinean members of the L. bicolor (Gray, 1842) group (L. bibonius Kraus & Allison, 2004, L. chloristona Menzies, Richards & Tyler, 2008, L. contrastens (Tyler, 1968), L. eurynastes Menzies, Richards & Tyler, 2008, L. lodesdema Menzies, Richards & Tyler, 2008, and L. viranula Menzies, Richards & Tyler, 2008) (Tyler 1968; Kraus and Allison, 2004; Menzies et al. 2008), in having a moderately robust (vs. slender) body (Fig. 2D), with snout not projecting and near-vertical in lateral view (vs. projecting, distinctly rounded in lateral view) (Kraus and Allison, 2004; Menzies et al., 2008), and having (vs. lacking) a distinct lemon yellow mid-lateral line in life (Fig. 2D); from L. christianbergmanni Günther, 2008 in its smaller size (male SVL 20.0–22.8 mm vs. 26.9–31.2 mm in L. christianbergmanni), and white bar below eye lacking (vs. present in L. christianbergmanni) (Günther, 2008); from L. chloronota (Boulenger, 1911) by its smaller body size (males 27–32 mm in L. chloronota), and broader snout (EN/IN 0.74–0.80 vs. 0.63–0.71 in L. chloronota; Menzies, 1993); from members of the L. gracilenta (Peters, 1869) group (L. aruensis (Horst, 1883), L. auae Menzies & Tyler, 2004, L. callista Kraus, 2013, L. elkeae Günther & Richards, 2000, L. eschata Kraus & Allison, 2009, L. kumae Menzies & Tyler, 2004, and L. robinsonae Oliver, Stuart-Fox and Richards, 2008) in its smaller size (male SVL<23 mm vs. >25 mm) and lacking pale canthal and postocular stripes (vs. present: Menzies and Tyler, 2004; Oliver et al., 2008; Kraus and Allison, 2009; Kraus, 2013); from L. havina Menzies, 1993 in lacking (vs. having) a fleshy rostral spike in males; from L. rubrops Kraus & Allison, 2004 in having dorsum without (vs. with) black or darker green speckling, and iris predominantly creamy white (vs. iris red in L. rubrops; Kraus and Allison, 2004); from L. nigropunctata (Meyer, 1875), L. iris (Tyler, 1962), L. majikthise Johnston & Richards, 1994, and L. ollauro Menzies, 1993, in its smaller size (male SVL<23 mm vs. >25 mm) and further from these species in having posterior surfaces of thighs translucent with purplish-grey spotting (vs. posterior of thighs blue, red, or yellow, sometimes blotched with white or purple) (Menzies, 1993); from L. richardsi Dennis & Cunningham, 2006 and L. singadanae Richards, 2005 in having a pigmented (vs. transparent) tympanic membrane (Dennis and Cunningham, 2006; Richards, 2005); and from L. verae Günther, 2004 in lacking (vs. having) crenulated skin folds along outer margins of tarsi (Günther, 2004).

  • Among small, green, stream-dwelling Litoria the new species differs from L. bulmeri (Tyler, 1968) by its smaller size (males 20.0–22.8 mm vs. 29–34 mm SVL), and black lateral stripe absent (vs. present); from L. longicrus (Boulenger, 1911) in having dorsum slightly granular (vs. smooth), and in lacking (vs. having) a distinct white bar beneath the tympanum (Tyler, 1968), and from L. wapogaensis Richards & Iskandar, 2001 in its smaller size (males 20.0–22.8 mm vs. 30.5–33 mm SVL), lacking (vs. having) vomerine teeth and having (vs. lacking) a distinct lemon yellow mid-lateral line (Tyler, 1968; Richards and Iskandar, 2001). The new species is morphologically most similar to L. leucova (Tyler, 1968), a small (males 21.7–24 mm SVL; S. Richards, personal observation) green treefrog known from the northern slopes of New Guinea's central cordillera and from the Hun-stein Mountains (Tyler, 1968; Johnston and Richards, 1994; Kraus and Allison, 2006; S. Richards, personal observation). It differs from that species by having longer limbs (TL/SVL 0.56–0.60 vs. 0.53–0.55; Johnston and Richards, 1994), a poorly defined (vs. prominent) tympanum, in having (vs. lacking) a distinct lemon yellow mid-lateral line (Figs. 2A–C), and in its unique advertisement call (Fig. 5). Litoria lakekamu and L. leucova both produce short and long calls but the short call of L. lakekamu is a distinctly pulsed note containing 4–8 pulses (vs. a single pulse in L. leucova) and two long calls of L. lakekamu contained 32 and 34 pulses and lasted 1.6–1.7 s (vs. 10 pulses in L. leucova and lasting 0.09 s); Johnston and Richards, 1994; S. Richards, personal observation).

  • IUCN Status.

  • Litoria lakekamu is known from a single location in primary lowland forest in southern Papua New Guinea. Although extensive areas of apparently suitable habitat remain in the region, this species was not detected during numerous fauna surveys in the Kikori and Purari basins to the west between 2001 and 2017 (S. Richards, personal observations). Until this species' distribution, habitat requirements and potential threats have been better documented we recommend that it be listed as Data Deficient.

  • Fig. 1.

    Holotype of Litoria lakekamu sp. nov. (SAMA R70113) in preservative. A: dorsal view of head (scale bar=5 mm), B: palmar view of right hand, C: plantar view of right foot (scale bars =1 mm).

    img-z4-1_43.jpg

    Fig. 2.

    Images in life of: (A) Litoria lakekamu sp. nov. paratype SAMA R70114, (B) Litoria lakekamu sp. nov. paratype PNGNM (FN: 11625), (C) Litoria leucova SAMA R71844 from the Sepik River catchment, northern Papua New Guinea, (D) Litoria lodesdema SAMA R64772 from New Britain Island, Papua New Guinea. Photographs by S. Richards.

    img-z5-1_43.jpg

    Fig. 3.

    Distribution of Litoria lakekamu sp. nov. (blue square), and its most similar congener L. leucova (yellow triangles).

    img-z5-3_43.jpg

    Fig. 4.

    Torrential stream habitat of Litoria lakekamu sp. nov. on the Sapoi River near Ivimka Camp, Lakekamu Basin, Gulf Province, Papua New Guinea. Males were calling from vegetation along the stream bank. Photograph by S. Richards.

    img-z5-6_43.jpg

    Table 1.

    Measurements and proportions of Litoria lakekamu sp. nov. SAMA R70113 is the holotype. All specimens are adult males.

    img-z6-2_43.gif

    Fig. 5.

    Waveform (top) and spectrogram (bottom) of: (A) an entire call series containing 12 calls produced by Litoria lakekamu sp. nov. (SAMA R70115), (B) detail of the last short call illustrated in (A), and (C) detail of the terminal long call from that series. The interval between the last short call illustrated in (B) and the terminal call (C) has been reduced to aid comparison.

    img-z7-1_43.jpg

    Discussion

    The Lakekamu basin incorporates a large expanse of primary foothill and alluvial forest on the southern fringe of Papua New Guinea's central cordillera. The basin was the focus of intensive efforts during the 1990s to establish a protected area for both conservation and research (Allison et al., 1998). As part of these efforts, a survey conducted in 1996 to identify the region's biodiversity documented numerous undescribed species of flora and fauna and a number of these are still known only from the basin including the frogs Callulops eremnosphax Kraus & Allison, 2009, Litoria robinsonae, and the damselfly Nososticta acuminata Michalski, Richards & Theischinger, 2012 (Oliver et al., 2008; Kraus and Allison, 2009; Michalski et al., 2012).

    Litoria lakekamu is the third new frog species to be described based on the collections of the 1996 Lakekamu basin survey. Its distribution remains poorly known, and intensive surveys in apparently suitable habitats to the west of Lakekamu in the catchments of the adjacent Purari and more distant Kikori rivers have failed to detect it or the other two frog species described recently from Lakekamu (Richards, 2002; S. Richards, personal observations). Nor have these species been reported from the more intensively surveyed lowland forests to the east near Port Moresby (Menzies, 2006). In addition, during the 1996 Lakekamu survey, we only detected these frogs from one small area of a single stream. Together these observations suggest that the forests of the Lakekamu basin may support a small assemblage of locally endemic frogs and that further species from the world's largest tropical island await discovery and description.

    Litoria lakekamu is amongst the smallest pelodryadid frogs currently known from New Guinea (Menzies, 2006). In its very small size and predominantly green dorsal coloration, it closely resembles Litoria leucova, a stream-breeding frog from northern New Guinea (Johnston and Richards, 1994; Kraus and Allison, 2006), and members of the lentic-breeding Litoria bicolor group (Menzies et al., 2008). The species' ecology suggests that it is more likely to be related to the clade of torrent-dwelling frogs including L. leucova (Richards et al., 2021), but this requires confirmation. This torrent-dwelling group is particularly diverse in the mountains of New Guinea but also contains a number of lowland forms. All of the specimens reported here were encountered along, and others were heard calling from the canopy above, a torrential, clear-flowing stream in primary forest. Collection of genetic material, and of additional information about this species' reproductive behaviour, is required to elucidate its relationships, habitat requirements, and ecology.

    Acknowledgments

    Fieldwork in Papua New Guinea was approved by the PNG National Research Institute and the PNG Department of Environment and Conservation (now the Conservation and Environment Protection Authority). We are particularly grateful to the landowners of the Ivimka area and Tekadu for their permission to work on their land. The Rapid Assessment Program (RAP) biodiversity survey in the Lakekamu Basin was a collaboration between the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) and Conservation International (CI) and we are most grateful to Andrew Mack and Banak Gamui (CI), Debra Wright (WCS), Geordie Torr and students of the 1996 Field Course on Biological Research, University of Papua New Guinea for their assistance during the survey. Export permits were provided by Barbara Roy from the PNG Department of Environment and Conservation. We thank Rose Singadan and Paulus Kei (UPNG, Port Moresby), Mark Hutchinson, Carolyn Kovach and Dominic Capone (South Australian Museum, Adelaide), Pim Arntzen (Naturalis, Leiden), Barry Clark (Natural History Museum, London), Helen Kurniati and Mumpuni (MZB, Bogor) and Patrick Couper (QM, Brisbane) for access to specimens under their care. Lisa Capon kindly produced the figures. During preparation of this manuscript SJR was supported by a grant from Re:wild.

    Literature Cited

    1.

    Clulow, S. and Swan, M. 2018. A Complete Guide to Frogs of Australia. Australian Geographic, Sydney. Google Scholar

    2.

    Dennis, A. J. and Cunningham, M. J. 2006. Litoria richardsi sp. nov., a new treefrog (Anura: Hylidae) from New Guinea. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 52: 65–69. Google Scholar

    3.

    Dubois, A., Ohler, A., and Pyron, A. 2021. New concepts and methods for phylogenetic taxonomy and nomenclature in zoology, exemplified by a new ranked cladonomy of recent amphibians (Lissamphibia). Megataxa 5: 1–738. Google Scholar

    4.

    Duellman, W. E., Marion, A. B., and Hedges, S. B. 2016. Phylogenetics, classification, and bio-geography of the treefrogs (Amphibia: Anura: Arboranae). Zootaxa 4104: 1–109. Google Scholar

    5.

    Günther, R. 2004. Two new treefrog species of the genus Litoria (Anura: Hylidae) from the west of New Guinea. Zoologische Abhandlungen (Staatliches Museum für Tierkunde in Dresden) 54: 163–175. Google Scholar

    6.

    Günther, R. 2008. Two new hylid frogs (Anura: Hylidae: Litoria) from western New Guinea. Vertebrate Zoology 58: 83–92. Google Scholar

    7.

    Johnston, G. R. and Richards, S. J. 1994. A new species of Litoria (Anura: Hylidae) from New Guinea and redefinition of Litoria leucova (Tyler, 1968). Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 37: 273–280. Google Scholar

    8.

    Köhler, J., Jansen, M., Rodríguez, A., Kok, P. J. R., Toledo, L. F., Emmrich, M., Glaw, F., Haddad, C. F. B., Rödel, M.-O., and Vences, M. 2017. The use of bioacoustics in anuran taxonomy: theory, terminology, methods and recommendations for best practice. Zootaxa 4251: 1–124. Google Scholar

    9.

    Kraus, F. 2013. A new treefrog of the Litoria gracilenta group (Hylidae) from Papua New Guinea. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 126: 151–160. Google Scholar

    10.

    Kraus, F. 2018. Taxonomy of Litoria graminea (Anura: Hylidae), with descriptions of two closely related new species. Zootaxa 4457: 264–284. Google Scholar

    11.

    Kraus, F. and Allison, A. 2004. A new species of Litoria (Anura: Hylidae) from southeastern New Guinea. Herpetologica 60: 97–103. Google Scholar

    12.

    Kraus, F. and Allison, A. 2006. Range extensions for reptiles and amphibians along the northern versant of Papua New Guinea. Herpetological Review 37: 364–368. Google Scholar

    13.

    Kraus, F. and Allison, A. 2009. New species of frogs from Papua New Guinea. Bishop Museum Occasional Papers 104: 1–36. Google Scholar

    14.

    Allison, A., Bickford, D., Richards, S. and Torr, G. 1998. Herpetofauna. p. 58–62. In : Mack, L. (ed.) A Biological Assessment of the Lakekamu Basin, Papua New Guinea. Rapid Assessment Program Working Paper Number 9. Conservation International, Washington. Google Scholar

    15.

    Menzies, J. I. 1993. Systematics of Litoria iris (Anura, Hylidae) and its allies in New-Guinea and a note on sexual dimorphism in the group. Australian Journal of Zoology 41: 225–255 Google Scholar

    16.

    Menzies, J. I. 2006. The Frogs of New Guinea and the Solomon Islands. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia. Google Scholar

    17.

    Menzies, J. I., Richards, S. J., and Tyler, M. J. 2008. Systematics of the Australo-Papuan tree frogs known as Litoria bicolor (Anura: Hylidae) in the Papuan Region. Australian Journal of Zoology 56: 257–280. Google Scholar

    18.

    Menzies, J. I. and Tyler, M. J. 2004. Litoria gracilenta (Anura: Hylidae) and related species in New Guinea. Australian Journal of Zoology 52: 191–214. Google Scholar

    19.

    Michalski, J., Richards, S. J., and Theischinger, G. 2012. An interesting new species of Nososticta Hagen from southern New Guinea (Odonata, Disparoneuridae). Zootaxa 3590: 73–78. Google Scholar

    20.

    Oliver, P., Richards, S. J., and Donnellan, S. C. 2019. Two new species of treefrog (Pelodrydidae: Litoria) from southern New Guinea elucidated by DNA barcoding. Zootaxa 4609: 469–484. Google Scholar

    21.

    Oliver, P. M., Stuart-Fox, D., and Richards, S. J. 2008. A new species of treefrog (Hylidae, Litoria) from the southern lowlands of New Guinea. Current Herpetology 27: 35–42. Google Scholar

    22.

    Richards, S. J. 2002. Rokrok: an Illustrated Field Guide to Frogs of the Kikori Integrated Conservation and Development Project Area of Papua New Guinea. WWF-PNG, Port Moresby. Google Scholar

    23.

    Richards, S. J. 2005. A new species of treefrog (Anura: Hylidae: Litoria) from the Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea. Zootaxa 1052: 29–39. Google Scholar

    24.

    Richards, S. J. and Iskandar, D. T. 2001. A new tree frog (Anura, Hylidae, Litoria) from the mountains of Irian Jaya, Indonesia. Alytes 18: 141–152. Google Scholar

    25.

    Richards, S. J. and Oliver, P. M. 2006. Two new species of large green canopy-dwelling frogs (Anura: Hylidae: Litoria) from Papua New Guinea. Zootaxa 1295: 41–60. Google Scholar

    26.

    Richards, S. J., Oliver, P., Dahl, C., and Tjaturadi, B. 2006. A new species of large green treefrog (Anura: Hylidae: Litoria) from northern New Guinea. Zootaxa 1208: 57–68. Google Scholar

    27.

    Richards, S. J., Tjaturadi, B., Krey, K., and Donnellan, S. C. 2021. A new stream-dwelling frog of the genus Litoria Tschudi, 1838 (Anura: Pelodrydidae) from Salawati Island, Indonesia. p. 19–33. In : D. Telnov, M. V. L. Barclay, and O. S. G. Pauwels (eds.), Biodiversity, Biogeography and Nature Conservation in Wallacea and New Guinea. Vol. IV. The Entomological Society of Latvia, Riga. Google Scholar

    28.

    Tyler, M. J. 1968. Papuan hylid frogs of the genus Hyla. Zoologische Verhandelingen 96: 1–203. Google Scholar

    29.

    Tyler M. J. and Davies, M. M. 1978. Species-groups within the Australopapuan hylid frog genus Litoria Tschudi. Australian Journal of Zoology, Supplemental Series 27: 1–47. Google Scholar

    Appendices

    Appendix

    Specimens examined for morphological comparisons.

    Litoria albolabris (Wandolleck, 1911). Papua New Guinea: Sandaun Province, Aitape, SAMA R4947 (syntype).

    Litoria auae Menzies & Tyler, 2004. Papua New Guinea: Gulf Province, Purari River, near McDowell Is, UP2490 (holotype), SAMA R57262–63 (paratypes).

    Litoria bulmeri (Tyler, 1968). Papua New Guinea: Madang Province, Upper Aunjung Valley, Schrader Mtns, SAMA R5625 (holotype).

    Litoria chloristona Menzies, Richards & Tyler, 2008. Papua New Guinea: National Capital District, Waigani, SAMA R9122a; Central Province, Brown River, SAMA R13251a–c; Gulf Province, Kopi, SAMA R63502–9 (all paratypes).

    Litoria chloronota (Boulenger, 1911). Indonesia: West Papua Province, Arfak Mountains, BM1947.2.31.20 (syntype), UP8380–8.

    Litoria contrastens (Tyler, 1968). Papua New Guinea: Eastern Highlands Province, Barabuna, SAMA R5845 (holotype), SAMA R6450 (paratype); Western Highlands Province, Noreikova, SAMA R5847 (five specimens).

    Litoria elkeae Günther & Richards, 2000. Indonesia: Papua Province, Siewa River, MZB Amph.3866–9, QMJ70490–2 (all paratypes).

    Litoria eurynastes Menzies, Richards & Tyler, 2008. Indonesia: Papua Province, Siewa River, MZB Amph.14651–5; Papua New Guinea: Manus Province, Lorengau, SAMA R63497–501 (all paratypes).

    Litoria havina Menzies, 1993. Papua New Guinea: Western Province, Ok Kam, UP7281 (holotype); Western Province, Ok Ma, UP 8406–7 (paratypes); Western Province, Ok Kam, SAMA R38596–7; Southern Highlands Province, Agogo Range, SAMA R60173–7.

    Litoria kumae Menzies & Tyler, 2004. Papua New Guinea: Southern Highlands Province, Tari, UP3108 (holotype), SAMA R52760–61 (paratypes).

    Litoria leucova (Tyler, 1968). Papua New Guinea: Sandaun Province, Mt Stolle, SAMA R44091–2, UP8604–6, upper Sepik River basin, SAMA R71844.

    Litoria lodesdema Menzies, Richards & Tyler, 2008. Papua New Guinea: East New Britain Province, Kerevat, SAMAR7046–47, R7049, R7055–56, R7058–59, R8439a, b., Vouvou SAMA R64772.

    Litoria longicrus (Boulenger, 1911). Indonesia: Papua Province, Wendessi, BM 1947.2.22.60–61 (syntypes).

    Litoria majikthise Johnston & Richards, 1994. Papua New Guinea: Western Province, Tabubil, SAMA R44093 (holotype), UP6734, 7305–9, 8501–8, 8602–3, SAMA R44094–44101 (all paratypes).

    Litoria modica (Tyler, 1968). Papua New Guinea: Eastern Highlands Province, Oruge, MCZ 52856 (holotype), MCZ 52857–52861, SAMA R8108 (paratypes).

    Litoria mucro Menzies, 1993. Papua New Guinea: East Sepik Province, Near Rauit Village, UP2741–3, 2745–56 (paratypes).

    Litoria mystax (van Kampen, 1906). Indonesia: Papua Province, Moaif, RMNH 4632 (holotype).

    Litoria nigropunctata (Meyer, 1875). Indonesia: Papua Province, Yapen Island, Mount Waira, ZMB 63977, Yapen Island near Kontiunae, SAMA R61799.

    Litoria richardsi Dennis & Cunningham, 2006. Papua New Guinea: Western Province, Tabubil, SAMA R60283 (holotype); Upper Fly River, SAMA R71602–5; Indonesia: Papua Province, Tiri River, Mamberamo Drainage, MZB Amph.11823 (paratype).

    Litoria robinsonae Oliver, Stuart-Fox & Richards, 2008. Papua New Guinea: Gulf Province, Ivimka, Lakekamu Basin, SAMA R55527 (holotype), R55528–9 (paratypes).

    Litoria singadanae Richards, 2005. Papua New Guinea: Morobe Province, Ridge above Surim Camp, eastern Finisterre Mountains, SAMA R60172 (holotype), UP 9968, SAMA R60171 (paratypes).

    Litoria verae Günther, 2004. Indonesia: Border of Papua and West Papua Provinces, Wondiwoi Mountains, ZMB 62384.

    Litoria viranula Menzies, Richards & Tyler, 2008. Papua New Guinea: Western Province, Bensbach River, SAMA R63487 (holotype), Wegamu, SAMA R63486–92 (paratypes); Indonesia: Papua Province, Merauke, SAMA R13666a–c, R13667a–d.

    Litoria wapogaensis Richards & Iskandar, 2001. Indonesia: Papua Province, Wapoga River, MZB Amph.3873 (holotype), MZB Amph.3874–76, SAMA R54595–98 (paratypes).

    © 2023 by The Herpetological Society of Japan
    Stephen J. Richards and David Bickford "A New Species of Small Green Treefrog (Pelodryadidae: Litoria) from the Lakekamu Basin in Southern Papua New Guinea," Current Herpetology 42(1), 43-54, (23 February 2023). https://doi.org/10.5358/hsj.42.43
    Accepted: 28 October 2022; Published: 23 February 2023
    KEYWORDS
    advertisement calls
    frog
    Litoria lakekamu sp. nov
    morphology
    taxonomy
    Back to Top