Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
25 August 2023 The Preference of Domestic Alien Toads, Bufo japonicus formosus, for Spawning Ponds on Sado Island
Kiyoto Sawada, Takashi Kamijo
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Although the global population of many native frog species has declined in recent years, alien frog species have spread rapidly worldwide. In order to eradicate alien frogs, characterizing their spawning sites is highly important. In recent years, eastern-Japanese common toads, Bufo japonicus formosus, have caused negative impacts on native ecosystems though predation and poisoning deaths as a domestic alien species. However, their spawning sites preference is little known. Here, to clarify when and what kind of ponds B. j. formosus prefers for spawning, we conducted a field survey on Sado Island which is one of the invaded regions of this species. We recorded their breeding season and analyzed what kind of ponds they use mainly focusing on the pond structure and landscape to obtain basic information for their eradication. Our results clarified that alien B. j. formosus on Sado Island have the same reproductive features as the native population according to the environmental conditions (lunar phase, wind speed, and rainless period), and the ponds they prefer for spawning are in areas with more surrounding forest and less rice paddy area regardless of pond structures. In addition, we identified that B. j. formosus on Sado Island currently have not yet formed large populations. These findings provide useful information for their eradication not only Sado Island but also in areas where B. j. formosus is distributed as an alien species. It is possibile that B. j. formosus on Sado Island can be eradicated completely if extermination activity is started immediately.

Introduction

Although the global population of many native frog species has declined in recent years (Wake and Vredenburg, 2008; Collins, 2010; Pimm et al., 2014), alien frog species have spread rapidly worldwide (Capinha et al., 2017). They cause negative impacts on native ecosystems through predation, diseases, and poisoning deaths (e.g., Daszak et al., 2004; Shine, 2010; Sarashina and Yoshida, 2015). A study focusing on the life history traits contributing to the invasion success of alien amphibians revealed that small body size and large clutch size promote their population establishment, and early maturity and higher introduction effort promote their population spread (Allen et al., 2017). Meanwhile, Measey et al. (2016) showed that the alien amphibian species with large body size and clutch size have significant environmental impacts. These comprehensive studies focused on invasion success and environmental impacts, respectively, and showed that large clutch size is common in invasive alien amphibians.

In general, frogs spend their larval stages in water and live on land in adult stages, but adult frogs need to migrate back to water area for breeding (Semlitsch, 2002). In addition, most frogs spend their adult stages near water bodies that serve as spawning sites (Rittenhouse and Semlitsch, 2007). Thus, characterizing their spawning sites is important in order to predict the potential habitats of alien frogs for eradicating them. In fact, many studies successfully eradicated invasive frog populations by intensively removing them from their habitat ponds (e.g., Kraus, 2009; Gray, 2009; Orchard, 2011).

Many alien species of the toad family Bufonidae Gray, 1825, such as cane toads and guttural toads, are invasive alien species that pose significant threats to native ecosystems worldwide (e.g., Mandrillon and Saglio, 2007; Shine, 2010; Ravalo et al., 2019). The global assessment of alien amphibian impacts conducted by Measey et al. (2016) showed that the toad family has relatively higher ecological and socio-economic impacts on native ecosystems than other amphibian taxa. In addition to the high predation pressure, which is common to many invasive alien frogs, alien toads cause poisonous death in upper predators due to steroid toxins stored in the parotoid glands (Letnic and Ward, 2005; Lodhi, 2018). Furthermore, tadpoles and egg masses of some toad species also possess deadly toxins (e.g., Crossland, 1999; Hayes et al., 2009; Shine, 2010). These findings imply that alien toads pose significant threats throughout their life stages, ranging from water to land.

Many species of toads known as “explosive breeders” concentrate their reproductive activity over short periods (Wells, 1977), and have a homing instinct to the pond where they were born (Sinsch, 1992). Also, a large clutch size is one of the promoters of range expansion among toads (Van Bocxlaer et al., 2010). Therefore, it would be effective to conduct extermination activities at the spawning ponds during the breeding season. For instance, on Nonsuch Island in Bermuda, extermination activities focused on spawning ponds have successfully eradicated the population of alien cane toads, Rhinella marina (Wingate, 2011). The preferences of toads for spawning ponds vary by species and are often characterized by the pond's structure and surrounding landscape. For example, the common toad, Bufo bufo, prefers permanent ponds, while the natterjack toad, Epidalea calamita, and European green toad, Bufotes viridis, prefers ephemeral ponds in Europe (Buskirk, 2003). In comparison, alien cane toads prefer ponds located in open areas with gently sloping banks and shallow water in the different climate regions in Australia (Semeniuk et al., 2007). Moreover, several factors have been found to be associated with the onset of breeding in some toad species, explosive breeders, such as precipitation, temperature and lunar phase (e.g., Vaira, 2005; Arnfield et al., 2012). Therefore, it is necessary to understand the breeding season and pattern, and spawning ponds preferences of each alien toad species for effective eradication.

In July 1963, three domestic alien toads (unknown sex), Bufo japonicus formosus, were introduced into pond at a temple called Kouninji, in the southwestern part of the Sado Island, Japan from the former Yunotani village (now Uonuma city), Niigata Prefecture, Japan (Nakamura, 1966). The following year, in March 1964, an additional 14 male and four female toads were introduced into the same pond from Sendai city, Miyagi Prefecture, Japan (Nakamura, 1966). Although B. j. formosus had already been introduced before 1963 in 1922 and 1961, it has been reported that these introductions did not lead to the establishment of populations (Okada, 1930; Iwasawa, 1960; Nakamura, 1966). Currently, they are distributed within 10 km from the point of introduction (Sawada et al., 2022). According to the species distribution model, there are concerns about their further expansion (Sawada et al., 2022). However, there have been no reports of the B. j. formosus eradication activities until now. On Sado Island, there is an abundance of ground beetles (Baba, 1963), which are the main prey taxa of B. j. formosus (Sarashina and Yoshida, 2015). Furthermore, an endangered species, the Japanese crested ibis, Nipponia nippon, which mainly eats frogs (Li et al., 2002), and the rare endemic species the Sado wrinkled frog, Glandirana susurra, which could be a potential competitor of B. j. formosus also live on Sado Island (Sado City, 2012). The negative impacts of B. j. formosus on the native ecosystems on Sado Island have not yet been reported. However, they will likely cause significant negative impacts on their potential preys, predators, and competitors. In other areas where B. j. formosus has invaded as a domestic alien species, there has been a serious impact on native ecosystems. For example, in Hokkaido, high predation pressure, mainly among insects (Sarashina and Yoshida, 2015), and poisonous death of endemic predators have been reported (Kazila and Kishida, 2019; Oyake et al., 2020). Recently, Okamiya et al. (2021) found that the egg of B. j. formosus also possesses toxins. On Izu Islands, they have been introduced on Oh-shima Island, Miyakejima Island, Nii-jima Island, and Hachijo-jima Island (Goto and Iwasaki, 2012; National Institute for Environmental Studies, 2022). Particularly, on Hachijo-jima Island, the local media has reported large number of B. j. formosus (Goto and Iwasaki, 2012). Although many studies focus on the reproductive traits of B. j. formosus and its subspecies Bufo japonicus japonicus, such as breeding season, movement, and population fluctuation (e.g., Okuno, 1973; Kusano et al., 2015; Okamiya and Kusano, 2018), only a few studies report on their spawning pond preference (e.g., Ishikuro and Iwai, 2018; Zheng et al., 2021), which is important information for their eradication.

Bufo japonicus tadpoles metamorphose into very small froglets, less than 1 cm (Okuno, 1984), and adults spend most of their life on land except during breeding season (Matsui, 2021). Therefore, we hypothesized that their spawning ponds tend to be in the forests and shallow wetlands to prevent juvenile desiccation and adult drowning. In fact, fatal cases of juvenile desiccation and adult drownings of toads have been reported in their native regions (e.g., Miyamae and Matsui, 1979; Shinohara, 1992).

To clarify when and what kind of ponds B. j. formosus prefers for spawning in invaded areas, we conducted a field survey on Sado Island, where negative impacts on native ecosystems by alien B. j. formosus are feared in the future. We recorded their breeding season and analyzed what kind of ponds they use mainly focusing on the pond structure and landscape to obtain basic information for their eradication.

Materials and Methods

Study site

This study was conducted on Sado Island (Sado City, Niigata Prefecture, Japan) (see Fig. 1), which is divided into three main areas: the Osado Mountains in the northern part of the island (maximum elevation 1,172 m), the Kosado Mountains in the southern part of the island (maximum elevation 645 m), and the Kuninaka Plain between the two mountain ranges (Sado City, 2012). Sado Island is located off the western coast of Niigata Prefecture, with an area of 855.25 km2, annual precipitation of 1,785 mm, annual mean temperature of 13.6°C (Sado City, 2012, 2021).

Surveys

Field surveys were conducted nine times for a total of 29 days between March and July 2020 (see Table 1) because previous studies conducted in Niigata and Nagaoka city in Niigata Prefecture reported early April to early May as the start of the B. j. formosus breeding season (Iwasawa and Miyazaki, 1984; Nakano, 2001). Surveyed ponds were selected to include a variety of environments and to be at least 200 m apart from each other because B. j. formosus is known to have an average home range of 20 m to 100 m (Kusano et al., 1995; Okuno, 1995; Okamiya and Kusano, 2018). Here, we defined a permanent water body with less than 8 m depth as a pond, referring to the studies by Oertli et al. (2000) and Biggs et al. (2005). We focused on ponds in the southwestern part of the island based on the previous study which confirmed that B. j. formosus was only distributed in that area (Sawada et al., 2022), and selected 45 ponds for the analysis (Fig. 1). All 45 pond field surveys were completed in March and April, and were monitored in May and June to ensure the presence or absence of B. j. formosus. Moreover, the ponds where B. j. formosus were found were visited during every survey after their initial observation. Alien B. j. formosus found during the survey were captured whenever possible and euthanized by freezing approximately –10°C (Lillywhite et al., 2017), and all egg masses we found were collected from the pond and disposed of so they would not hatch.

Fig. 1.

The elevation map of Sado Island and field survey sites. The star and circles indicate the locations where the pond surveys were conducted. The star indicates the Kouninji where Bufo japonicus formosus were introduced. White circles indicate sites where no B. j. formosus were found, and black circles and a star indicate sites where B. j. formosus were found. Sendai City is the origin site of the alien B. j. formosus on Sado Island (Nakamura, 1966). Elevation data were obtained from the digital national land information (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, 2009) and compiled on Geographic Information System.

img-z4-1_99.jpg

During the field surveys, we recorded the presence or absence of B. j. formosus and their life stages, and period of pond use of B. j. formosus. Toad presence data were recorded with three stages information (adults, tadpoles, or egg masses). To collect pond structure data, the pond's perimeter (m), depth (cm), material (artificial or natural), and vegetation cover on the surface of the pond (%) were measured on site. As for pond material, ponds with rubber or concrete bottoms were considered artificial material ponds, and ponds with gravel or soil bottoms were considered natural material ponds. Most ponds on Sado Island are artificial (approximately 1,400) (Ouchi, 2012), and therefore it was difficult for us to find and distinguish natural ponds. After the field survey, to examine the relationship between weather conditions and the timing of the B. j. formosus breeding initiation, weather data was obtained from the Japan Meteorological Agency (2020) and compared with previous studies. Also, the forest and rice paddy area (m2) within a 100 m riparian buffer of each pond was calculated to collect landscape data. The size of this buffer was determined with reference to the average home range of B. j. formosus being 100 m (Kusano et al., 1995; Okamiya and Kusano, 2018). The forest and rice paddy area data were calculated using a QGIS version 3.6.0 (QGIS Development Team, 2019) based on the vegetation map data (Ministry of the Environment, 1999).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using RStudio Desktop 1.3.1093 (RStudio Team, 2021). To clarify the pond preference of alien B. j. formosus on Sado Island, we examined the effect of explanatory variables on response variable using the generalized linear model (GLM). The response variable was the presence or absence of B. j. formosus (absence: 0; presence: 1). The explanatory variables were the pond's perimeter (m), depth (cm), material (artificial: 0; natural: 1), vegetation cover on the surface of the pond (%), forest area (m2), and rice paddy area (m2). To avoid multicollinearity between explanatory variables, Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC) and variance inflation factor (VIF) were calculated (Appendixes I and II) using the package ‘psych’ (Revelle, 2022) and ‘car’ (Fox et al., 2022), respectively. Referring to the studies by Wen et al. (2015) and Alin (2010), we determined high collinearity when PCC was greater than 0.75 or less than –0.75 and when VIF was greater than 10. GLM was performed with binomial distribution and logit link function using RStudio’s default function ‘glm’ (RStudio Team, 2021). The correlation strength between the response variable and each explanatory variable was evaluated using Wald statistics (z-value). We determined the explanatory variable to be significant for the response variable if the P-value calculated from the z-value was less than 0.05. Akaike’s information criterion (AIC; Akaike, 1973) was used to select the best model. The set of models were generated with all possible combinations of the explanatory variables using the package ‘MuMIn’ (Bartoń, 2022). The model with the smallest AIC was selected as the best model and Model 1. The models with differences of 2 or less from the AIC of Model 1 (ΔAIC≤2) were also selected as the best models and Model numbers were assigned in descending order of ΔAIC values. In addition, to evaluate the most important explanatory variables in them, model averaging was performed on the best models using the package ‘MuMIn’ (Bartoń, 2022).

Table 1.

Seasonal changes in pond use by Bufo japonicus formosus. Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of adult females (F) and males (M) captured. The alien B. j. formosus found during the survey were captured whenever possible and euthanized by freezing approximately –10°C, and all egg masses we found were collected from the pond and disposed of so they would not hatch.

img-z5-2_99.gif

Finally, after the GLM analysis, box-and-whisker plots were created for each significant explanatory variable, with and without B. j. formosus, to understand its specific characteristics.

Results

Field survey

Bufo japonicus formosus were observed in 13 of the 45 ponds surveyed (Fig. 1; Appendix III). They were observed in the ponds between 11 March and 22 April 2020, with adults observed between 11 March and 26 March, egg masses between 24 March and 9 April, and tadpoles from 8 April to 22 April (Table 1). The highest numbers of B. j. formosus, i.e., 15 adults (10 males and five females) and three egg masses (Table 2), were observed in the pond at Kuoninji where they were introduced; the number of adults observed from 11 March to 12 March was nine males and one female and from 24 March to 26 March, one male and four females. For the other 12 ponds, no correlation between distance from the Kouninji and the number of observed B. j. formosus was found (Adult: PCC=–0.61, Egg mass: PCC= –0.06, Tadpoles: PCC=–0.16) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Detailed records of ponds where Bufo japonicus formosus were observed. The Kouninji is the introduced site of B. j. formosus (Nakamura, 1966). Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of adult females (F) and males (M) captured.

img-z6-2_99.gif

Spawning pond preference

All explanatory variables were included for the GLM as a result of PCC and VIF evaluation, and seven GLMs were selected as the best models using AIC best model selection (Table 3). In the best models, there were no significant relationships between the B. j. formosus presence and pond structure variables (Table 3). On the other hand, the most frequently used explanatory variable was forest area, which was used in six of the seven best models (Table 3).

Forest area was significantly positively correlated with the presence of B. j. formosus in all models including forest area except model 5 (Table 3). The values for the mean±standard deviation (SD) of forest area for ponds with and without B. j. formosus were 22,010± 7,960 m2 and 15,220±8,730 m2, respectively, and B. j. formosus were never observed at the ponds with less than 5,346 m2 (≈15%; for a buffer area of 31,400 m2 with a radius of 100 m) of forest area (Fig. 2A).

In Model 2, the rice paddy area was significantly negatively correlated with the presence of B. j. formosus (Table 3). The values for the mean±SD of the rice paddy area for the ponds with and without B. j. formosus were 6,740±7,320 m2 and 12,370±8,280 m2, respectively, and excluding the one outlier, B. j. formosus were never observed in the ponds with more than 12,781 m2 (≈40%; for a buffer area of 31,400 m2 with a radius of 100 m) of rice paddy area (Fig. 2B).

Table 3.

Results of GLMs estimation of pond characteristics that determine the presence or absence of Bufo japonicus formosus. Coefficients for models where the ΔAIC was within two are shown. Asterisks (*) denote coefficients for which the P-value from the Wald test was less than 0.05. Details of each explanatory variables are followings: Perimeter: (m); Depth: (cm); Material: (artificial: 0, natural: 1); Plant: Vegetation cover on the surface of the pond (%); Forest: Forest area within 100 m from survey ponds (m2); Rice: Rice paddy area within 100 m from survey ponds (m2).

img-z7-2_99.gif

The results of averaging the seven best models showed that the explanatory variables could be ranked in the following order according to their importance: forest area, rice paddy area, vegetation cover, material, depth, and perimeter (Table 4). In particular, forest area was remarkably important compared to the other explanatory variables (Table 4).

Discussion

Invasion state of B. j. formosus

The nine-year monitoring study of Okuno (1973), focused on the native B. j. japonicus until its decline, reported that the largest breeding population included 209 adults in one year in a pond, and the smallest breeding population included 18 adults in a pond. In addition, on Hachijo-jima Island and Hokkaido, where B. j. formosus are invasive, 1,471 and 3,079 adults were captured at one site during a year (Goto and Iwasaki, 2012; Tokuda, 2021). Therefore, it is highly likely that alien B. j. formosus on Sado Island have not yet formed large populations, since the maximum number of adult B. j. formosus observed in one pond was 15 in this study (Table 2).

However, there has been a steady expansion of B. j. formosus populations on Sado Island; as of 2020, 56 years after the invasion, it was estimated that the expansion has reached areas approximately 10 km from the point of introduction (Sawada et al., 2022). In addition, Sado Island is included in both the latitude and longitude of the Japanese toads' natural distribution area (Matsui, 2021), and Sawada et al. (2022) predicted that the B. j. formosus populations will expand into the south-eastern part of the Island along the Kosado Mountains in the near future. Hence, although the B. j. formosus population on Sado Island may be suppressed by non-climatic factors, such as abiotic and topographic conditions, it is undeniable that it will not increase in the future.

Breeding season

In the pond at the Kouninji, where the highest number of B. j. formosus was observed, we found that females appeared more frequently in the later stages of the breeding season (Table 1). Based on Okuno (1973), which showed that the peak breeding period is between the first and second days when many female toads appear in the pond, in our study, end of March may have been the peak breeding season.

Kusano et al. (2015) showed that lunar phase significantly influences the reproductive activity of B. j. formosus, which increases as the new moon approaches, even after taking into account the effects of weather conditions. During study, 24 March 2020 was the new moon on Sado Island (Japan Meteorological Agency, 2020). Assuming the peak breeding period was end of March, the main activating factor of reproductive behavior for alien B. j. formosus on Sado Island would be the new moon, similar to native populations.

Fig. 2.

Relationship between the presence or absence of Bufo japonicus formosus and the area of forest and rice field within 100 m from the ponds. Box-and-whisker plots and mean value of the forest area (A) and rice paddy area (B) within 100 m of the ponds. The values for the mean±standard deviation (SD) of forest area for ponds with and without B. j. formosus were 22,010±7,960 m2 and 15,220±8,730 m2, respectively, and those of the rice paddy area were 6,740±7,320 m2 and 12,370±8,280 m2, respectively. The horizontal lines represent (from the top) the maximum, the third quartile, the median, the first quartile and the minimum. The cross mark indicates the average value. The shaded box represents the middle 50% of the distribution (between the first and third quartiles). The circles indicate each raw data, and a black circle indicates an outlier.

img-z8-1_99.jpg

In addition, Kusano et al. (2015) showed that the breeding activity of B. j. formosus increases when daily mean wind speed becomes stronger and the rainless period lasts longer, although they are not as influential as the lunar phases. On Sado Island, the daily mean wind speed in March 2020 was 2.3 m/s, whereas that on 11 March was 3.1 m/s, making it the second strongest day between 1 and 11 March (Japan Meteorological Agency, 2020). Incidentally, maximum instantaneous wind speed of 7.0 m/s on 11 March was the strongest between 1 and 11 March (Japan Meteorological Agency, 2020). Furthermore, the longest rainless period in March 2020 lasted three days from 7 to 9 March, while the last time there were three or more days without rain before this date was three days from 25 to 27 January (Japan Meteorological Agency, 2020). These results confirmed that the breeding season activity of alien B. j. formosus on Sado Island corresponds to that of populations living in their native habitat.

Spawning pond preference

In terms of landscape characteristics, the forest area within 100 m of the pond was significantly positively correlated with the presence of B. j. formosus (Table 3). Zheng et al. (2021), who conducted a study in an urban-to-rural gradient area, showed that B. j. formosus prefer to spawn in forested areas within 100 m of the study site at the landscape level, as they did in this study. Moreover, at the pond structure level, shallow water depth, greater cover of aquatic vegetation, and increased water area were deemed to be important variables to influence on the number of B. j. formosus egg masses (Zheng et al., 2021). Furthermore, as our study focused only on permanent ponds, our results may differ from those of Zheng et al. (2021) as they only focused on paddy fields (including abandoned ones). As for forest area, it has been demonstrated that adult B. j. formosus prefer closed canopies as their habitats during the non-breeding season because they use them to retain body water (Okamiya and Kusano, 2018). In addition, forests are essential ecosystems for tadpoles and frog juveniles as they help avoid desiccation (Osawa and Katsuno, 2001a; Rothermel and Semlitsch, 2002); with this in mind, and considering that B. japonicus tadpoles metamorphose into especially small froglets measuring less than 1 cm (Okuno, 1984), one could easily assume that a pond with landscape structures that help block sunlight, such as a forest, is indispensable for preventing desiccation, which was one of our initial hypotheses.

Table 4.

Model averaging parameter estimates of standardized partial regression coefficients. The predictors are sorted by the relative importance. Model averaging was performed from the seven best models shown in Table 3. The relative importance for a predictor is the sum of Akaike weights of the models in which the predictor was present, referring to Kusano et al. (2015). Details of each explanatory variables are followings: Perimeter: (m); Depth: (cm); Material: (artificial: 0, natural: 1); Plant: Vegetation cover on the surface of the pond (%); Forest: Forest area within 100 m from survey ponds (m2); Rice: Rice paddy area within 100 m from survey ponds (m2).

img-z9-2_99.gif

Rice paddy fields are important spawning sites for frogs in Japan, such as the Japanese tree frog, Dryophytes japonica, and Japanese brown frog, Rana japonica (e.g., Osawa, 2008; Watabe et al., 2021). While toads have often been seen in wetlands near rice paddy fields (e.g., Miyamae and Matsui, 1979; Kusano et al., 1995; Fukuyama et al., 2007), there is little evidence showing that they use rice paddy area for spawning (e.g., Zheng et al., 2021); besides, our results showed a negative correlation between rice paddy area and presence of B. j. formosus (Table 3). It is generally believed that organisms in the same taxonomic group avoid interspecific competition with the temporal and spatial division of reproductive resources (Crump, 1971; Maiorana, 1976), which has often been observed in frogs as well (e.g., Donnelly and Guyer, 1994; Gillespie et al., 2004). On Sado Island, the montane brown frog, Rana ornativentris, has their breeding season in early to late March (Kato et al., 2010; Uruma et al., 2012), sharing the breeding season with B. j. formosus (Table 1), and they are generally found in forests and grasslands and mainly use stagnant water such as rice paddy fields as its spawning site (Osawa and Katsuno, 2001b). Therefore, alien B. j. formosus may avoid rice paddy fields used by R. ornativentris for spawning.

Measures for eradication

We confirmed that alien B. j. formosus on Sado Island have the same reproductive requirements as the native population based on environmental conditions (lunar phase, wind speed, and rainless period: Table 1), and the ponds they prefer for spawning are in areas with more surrounding forest and less rice paddy area regardless of the pond structure (Fig. 2; Table 3). Moreover, we identified that the population on Sado Island is currently very small (Table 2). Early countermeasures are the most effective way to control the impact of alien species and reduce the eradication cost, time, and efforts (e.g., Simberloff et al., 2013; Russell et al., 2017). For these reasons, extermination activities on Sado Island should be conducted immediately before a large population forms. Numerous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of intensive eradication efforts focused on spawning ponds during the breeding season (e.g., Wingate, 2011). Such measures have also successfully captured many alien toads in the short term on Hokkaido and Hachijo-jima Island, where B. j. formosus has invaded as a domestic alien species (Goto and Iwasaki, 2012; Naito and Shiga, 2016). Bufo j. japopnicus spawns in ponds as well as small water bodies such as puddles, but the ponds become large breeding sites (Kuwabara et al., 2019). To implement the eradication activities more efficiently, it is important to select priority management ponds and seasons based on the results of this study and the study of potential distribution areas by Sawada et al. (2022). We consider it a top priority to eradicate B. j. formosus in the 13 ponds where they were found and ponds in forests within their potential distribution areas need attention. In the ponds where B. j. formosus are particularly abundant, it should be necessary to consider installing traps for mass capture of toads, such as the drift fence with large pit-falls trap (Suzuki et al., 2018) that prevent toads from getting out once they enter the pond (Tokuda, 2021) minimizing the impact of traps on native species.

The Australian invasive frog, the cane toad, has a similar preference for spawning ponds even in different climatic regions (Semeniuk et al., 2007). Therefore, it is highly likely that B. j. formosus will show similar spawning pond preferences in Hokkaido and the Izu Islands as they did on Sado Island, and the results of this study will provide useful information for eradication activities not only on Sado Island but also in areas where B. j. formosus is distributed as an alien species.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Harue Abe, the laboratory members of Silviculture and Nature Conservation in Tsukuba University, the members of Sado Island Center for Ecological Sustainability in Niigata University, and all volunteers who helped us. This work was supported by JST SPRING [grant number JPMJSP2124] and JSPS KAKEN [grant number 22J1120].

© 2023 by The Herpetological Society of Japan

Literature Cited

1.

Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. p. 267–281. In : B. N. Petrov and F. Csaki (eds.), Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest. Google Scholar

2.

Alin, A. 2010. Multicollinearity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 2: 370–374. Google Scholar

3.

Allen, W. L., Street S. E., and Capellini, I. 2017. Fast life history traits promote invasion success in amphibians and reptiles. Ecology Letters 20: 222–230. Google Scholar

4.

Arnfield, H., Grant, R., Monk, C., and Uller, T. 2012. Factors influencing the timing of spring migration in common toads (Bufo bufo). Journal of Zoology 288: 112–118. Google Scholar

5.

Baba, K. 1963. A review on the insects of Sado Island. Bulletin of the Sado Museum 5: 1–11. Google Scholar

6.

Bartoń, K. 2022. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. Version 1.46.0. Available via https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=MuMIn  Google Scholar

7.

Biggs, J., Williams, P., Whitfield, M., Nicolet, P., and Weatherby, A. 2005. 15 years of pond assessment in Britain: results and lessons learned from the work of Pond Conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 15: 693–714. Google Scholar

8.

Buskirk, J. V. 2003. Habitat partitioning in European and North American pond-breeding frogs and toads. Diversity and Distributions 9: 399–410. Google Scholar

9.

Capinha, C., Seebens, H., Cassey, P., García–Díaz, P., Lenzner, B., Mang, T., Moser, D., Pyšek, P., Rödder, D., Scalera, R., Winter, M., Dullinger, S., and Essl, F. 2017. Diversity, biogeography and the global flows of alien amphibians and reptiles. Diversity and Distributions 23: 1313–1322. Google Scholar

10.

Collins, J. P. 2010. Amphibian decline and extinction: what we know and what we need to learn. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 92: 93–99. Google Scholar

11.

Crossland, M. R. and Azevedo-Ramos, C. 1999. Effects of Bufo (Anura: Bufonidae) toxins on tadpoles from native and exotic Bufo habitats. Herpetologica 55: 192–199. Google Scholar

12.

Crump, R. G. 1971. Annual reproductive cycles in three geographically separated populations of Patiriella regularis (Verrill), a common New Zealand asteroid. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 7: 137–162. Google Scholar

13.

Daszak, P., Strieby, A., Cunningham, A. A., Longcore, J. E., Brown, C. C., and Porter, D. 2004. Experimental evidence that the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) is a potential carrier of chytridiomycosis, an emerging fungal disease of amphibians. Herpetological Journal 14: 201–208. Google Scholar

14.

Donnelly, M. A. and Guyer, C. 1994. Patterns of reproduction and habitat use in an assemblage of Neotropical hylid frogs. Oecologia 98: 291–302. Google Scholar

15.

Fox, J., Weisberg, S., Price, B., Adler, D., Bates, D., Baud-Bovy, G., Bolker, B., Ellison, S., Firth, D., Friendly, M., Gorjanc, G., Graves, S., Heiberger, R., Krivitsky, P., Laboissiere, R., Maechler, M., Monette, G., Murdoch, D., Nilsson, H., Ogle, D., Ripley, B., Venables, W., Walker, S., Winsemius, D., Zeileis, A., and R-Core. 2022. Car: Companion to Applied Regression. Version 2.25. Available via  https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=car  Google Scholar

16.

Fukuyama, K., Abe, M., Matsuda, H., and Sasaki, F. 2007. Monitoring of long term trends in Rana ornativentris and Bufo japonicus formosus in the Segami Valley, Yokohama, Japan. Bulletin of the Herpetological Society of Japan 2: 146–153. Google Scholar

17.

Gillespie, G. R., Lockie, D., Scroggie, M. P., and Iskandar, D. T. 2004. Habitat use by stream-breeding frogs in south-east Sulawesi, with some preliminary observations on community organization. Journal of Tropical Ecology 20: 439–448. Google Scholar

18.

Goto, Y. and Iwasaki, Y. 2012. The eradication of Bufo japonicus formosus on Hachijo Island in 2012. Bulletin of the Herpetological Society of Japan 2: 112–114. Google Scholar

19.

Gray, I. 2009. Breeding pond dispersal of interacting California red-legged frogs (Rana draytonii) and American bullfrogs (Lithobates catesbeianus) of California: A mathematical model with management strategies. Unpublished master's thesis. Humboldt State University, California. Google Scholar

20.

Hayes, R. A., Crossland, M. R., Hagman, M., Capon, R. J., and Shine, R. 2009. Ontogenetic variation in the chemical defenses of cane toads (Bufo marinus): toxin profiles and effects on predators. Journal of Chemical Ecology 35: 391–399. Google Scholar

21.

Ishikuro, H. and Iwai, N. 2018. Effects of noise and light on breeding and oviposition site selection by frogs in urban ponds. Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology 23: 177–186. Google Scholar

22.

Iwasawa, H. 1960. Memorandums on amphibia of Sado and a list of vertebrata of Sado Island. Bulletin of the Sado Museum 4: 21–25. Google Scholar

23.

Iwasawa, H. and Miyazaki, H. 1984. Breeding emergence of the toad Bufo japonicus formosus in Donchi-ike, Niigata city, in the delayed spring of 1984. Japanese Journal of Herpetology 10: 104–106. Google Scholar

24.

Japan Meteorological Agency. 2020. Historical Weather Data Search.  https://www.data.jma.go.jp/obd/stats/etrn/index.php?prec_no=45&block_no=47682 (accessed 12 April 2022) Google Scholar

25.

Kato, N., Yoshio, M., Kobayashi, R., and Miyashita, T. 2010. Differential responses of two anuran species breeding in rice fields to landscape composition and spatial scale. Wetlands 30: 1171–1179. Google Scholar

26.

Kazila, E. and Kishida, O. 2019. Foraging traits of native predators determine their vulnerability to a toxic alien prey. Freshwater Biology 64: 56–70. Google Scholar

27.

Kraus, F. 2009. Management Responses. p. 95–110. In : F. Kraus (ed.), Alien Reptiles and Amphibians: A Scientific Compendium and Analysis. Springer, Dordrecht. Google Scholar

28.

Kusano, T., Maruyama, K., and Kaneko, S. 1995. Post-breeding dispersal of the Japanese toad, Bufo japonicus formosus. Journal of Herpetology 29: 633–638. Google Scholar

29.

Kusano, T., Miura, T., Terui, S., and Maruyama, K. 2015. Factors affecting the breeding activity of the Japanese common toad, Bufo japonicus formosus (Amphibia: Bufonidae) with special reference to the lunar cycle. Current Herpetology 34: 101–111. Google Scholar

30.

Kuwabara, K., Itou, A., Kano, T., Okuda, M., Kakuya, E., Oka, S., Matsukawa, J., Hirakawa, S., Morioka, H., and Doi, T. 2019. Disappearance of egg-laying sites of Western-Japanese common toad, Bufo japonicus japonicus in Ohnan-cho, Shimane prefecture. p. 23–30. In : A. Iwasawa, M. Kumakura, A. Sasaki, N. Sato, M. Sano, B. Takayama, H. Takahashi, T. Nomura, Y. Hasegawa, and H. Fujita (eds.), Enhanted by the Amphibians. Nippon Batrachological Society, Niigata. Google Scholar

31.

Letnic, M. and Ward, S. 2005. Observation of freshwater crocodiles (Crocodylus johnstoni) preying upon cane toads (Bufo marinus) in the Northern Territory. Herpetofauna 35: 98–100. Google Scholar

32.

Li, X., Li, D., Li, Y., Ma, Z., and Zhai, T. 2002. Habitat evaluation for crested ibis: a GIS-based approach. Ecological Research 17: 565–573. Google Scholar

33.

Lillywhite, H. B., Shine, R., Jacobson, E., DeNardo, D. F., Gordon, M. S., Navas, C. A., Wang, T., Seymour, R. S., Storey, K. B., Heatwole, H., Heard, D., Brattstrom, B., and Burghardt, G. M. 2017. Anesthesia and euthanasia of amphibians and reptiles used in scientific research: should hypothermia and freezing be prohibited? Bioscience 67: 53–61. Google Scholar

34.

Lodhi, F. L. 2018. A fatal case of toad (Bufo melanostictus) intoxication in a german shepherd dog and review of literature. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences 6: 156–160. Google Scholar

35.

Maiorana, V. C. 1976. Reproductive value, prudent predators, and group selection. The American Naturalist 110: 486–489. Google Scholar

36.

Mandrillon, A. L. and Saglio, P. 2007. Herbicide exposure affects the chemical recognition of a non native predator in common toad tadpoles (Bufo bufo). Chemoecology 17: 31–36. Google Scholar

37.

Matsui, M. 2021. Bufonidae. p. 37–42. In : Herpetological Society of Japan (ed.), Amphibians and Reptiles of Japan. Sunrise Publishing, Hikone. Google Scholar

38.

Measey, G. J., Vimercati, G., De Villiers, F. A., Mokhatla, M., Davies, S. J., Thorp, C. J., Rebelo, A. D., and Kumschick, S. 2016. A global assessment of alien amphibian impacts in a formal framework. Diversity and Distributions 22: 970–981. Google Scholar

39.

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. 2009. Digital national land information, Elevation and Slope mesh data . Available via  https://nlftp.mlit.go.jp/ksj/gml/datalist/KsjTmplt-G04-d.html  Google Scholar

40.

Ministry of the Environment. 1999. Vegetation survey 2nd–5th, Niigata Prefecture. Available via  http://www.biodic.go.jp/trialSystem/EN/vg/vg.ht ml  Google Scholar

41.

Miyamae, M. and Matsui, M. 1979. Larval growth and development of the Japanese toad, Bufo bufo formosus, at Iwakura, Kyoto. Contributions from the Biological Laboratory, Kyoto University 25: 273–294. Google Scholar

42.

Naito, H. and Shiga, K. 2016. Immigrant of Bufo japonicus into the left bank region of Ishikari estuary, Hokkaido, Japan. Bulletin of Ishikari Sakyu no kaze Museum 6: 65–70. Google Scholar

43.

Nakamura, Y. 1966. Invasion of Rana nigromaculata and Bufo japonicus formosus on Sado Island. Bulletin of the Sado Museum 2: 10–11. Google Scholar

44.

Nakano, M. 2001. Spawning behavior of Azuma toads in the Nagaoka Higashiyama area and the influence of valley stops. Journal of the Niigata Society of Engineering Geology 56: 49–56. Google Scholar

45.

National institute for Environmental Studies. 2022. Invasive Species of Japan.  https://www.nies.go.jp/biodiversity/invasive/DB/etoc4_amphibians.html (accessed 12 April 2022) Google Scholar

46.

Oertli, B., Joye, D., Castella, E., Juge, R., and Lachavanne, J. B. 2000. Diversité biologique et typologie écologique des étangs et petits lacs de Suisse. OFEFP, University of Geneva, Geneva. Available via  http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:26123  Google Scholar

47.

Okada, Y. 1930. Topics: Sado Island. p. 209–211. In : Y. Okada (ed.), Japanese Frog Review. Iwanami Shoten. Tokyo. Google Scholar

48.

Okamiya, H. and Kusano, T. 2018. Evaluating movement patterns and microhabitat selection of the Japanese common toad (Bufo japonicus formosus) using fluorescent powder tracking. Zoological Science 35: 153–160. Google Scholar

49.

Okamiya, H., Takai, K., and Kishida, O. 2021. Japanese common toad, Bufo japonicus formosus, contains venom in the egg stage. Current Herpetology 40: 103–106. Google Scholar

50.

Okuno, R. 1973. The records of the Japanese toad, Bufo japonicus japonicus, in Kanazawa castle. Annual report of Botanic Garden, Faculty of Science, Kanazawa University 11: 5–17. Google Scholar

51.

Okuno, R. 1984. Studies on the natural history of the Japanese toad, Bufo japonicus japonicus: IV. Post-metamorphic growth and age of maturity. Japanese Journal of Ecology 34: 445–455. Google Scholar

52.

Okuno, R. 1995. The Records of the Japanese Toad, Bufo japonicus japonicus, in Kanazawa Castle. Doubutsusya, Tokyo. Google Scholar

53.

Orchard, S. A. 2011. Removal of the American bullfrog, Rana (Lithobates) catesbeiana, from a pond and a lake on Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. p. 217–221. In : C. R. Veitch, M. N. Clout, and D. R. Towns (eds.), Island Invasives: Eradication and Management. IUCN, Gland. Google Scholar

54.

Osawa, S. 2008. The spawning of Bufo japonicus formosus and Rana ornativentris from 1997 to 2001 in the Segami-Yato valley, southern Tama-Hills. Bulletin of the Herpetological Society of Japan 1: 10–12. Google Scholar

55.

Osawa, S. and Katsuno, T. 2001a. Dispersal of brown frogs Rana japonica and R. ornativentris in the forests of the Tama Hills. Current Herpetology 20: 1–10. Google Scholar

56.

Osawa, S. and Katsuno, T. 2001b. The relationship between habitats of brown frogs and floor conditions in hill's woodland. Landscape Research Japan 64: 611–616. Google Scholar

57.

Ouchi, H. 2012. A report on the “6th Tameike Symposium in Sado Island”. Nature of Irrigation Pond 52: 18–22. Google Scholar

58.

Oyake, N., Sasaki, N., Yamaguchi, A., Fujita, H., Tagami, M., Ikeya, K., Tagami, M., Kobayashi, M., Abe, H., and Kishida, O. 2020. Comparison of susceptibility to a toxic alien toad (Bufo japonicus formosus) between predators in its native and invaded ranges. Freshwater Biology 65: 240–252. Google Scholar

59.

Pimm, S. L., Jenkins, C. N., Abell, R., Brooks, T. M., Gittleman, J. L., Joppa, L. N., Raven, P. H., Roberts, C. M., and Sexton, J. O. 2014. The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344: 1246752. Google Scholar

60.

QGIS Development Team. 2019. QGIS geographic information system. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. Available via  https://qgis.org/en/site/forusers/download.html  Google Scholar

61.

Ravalo, D. D., Gersava, J. R., Alojado, J., Achondo, M. J. M., and Gamalo, L. E. 2019. Predation of Samar Cobra Naja samarensis Peters, 1861 on the invasive Cane Toad Rhinella marina (Linnaeus, 1758) in Davao City, Philippines. Herpetology Notes 12: 1023–1025. Google Scholar

62.

Revelle, W. 2022. psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. Version 2.2.5 . Available via  https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych  Google Scholar

63.

Rittenhouse, T. A. and Semlitsch, R. D. 2007. Distribution of amphibians in terrestrial habitat surrounding wetlands. Wetlands 27: 153–161. Google Scholar

64.

Rothermel, B. B. and Semlitsch, R. D. 2002. An experimental investigation of landscape resistance of forest versus old-field habitats to emigrating juvenile amphibians. Conservation Biology 16: 1324–1332. Google Scholar

65.

RStudio Team. 2021. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston. Available via  http://www.rstudio.com/  Google Scholar

66.

Russell, J. C., Meyer, J. Y., Holmes, N. D., and Pagad, S. 2017. Invasive alien species on Islands: impacts, distribution, interactions and management. Environmental Conservation 44: 359–370. Google Scholar

67.

Sado city. 2012. Environmental compendium of Sado Island. Sado city, Niigata. Google Scholar

68.

Sado city. 2021. Statistical data: Topography. Sado city.  https://www.city.sado.niigata.jp/soshiki/2015/2522.html (accessed 4 April 2022) Google Scholar

69.

Sarashina, M. and Yoshida, T. 2015. Predation impacts of four invasive frogs in Hokkaido, Japan, assessed by an index of relative importance. Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology 20: 15–26. Google Scholar

70.

Sawada, K., Aihara, T., and Kamijo, T. 2022. Current and future predicted distributions of invasive toads (Anura: Bufonidae) and bullfrogs (Anura: Ranidae) on Sado Island. Journal of Asia Pacific Biodiversity 15: 345–353. Google Scholar

71.

Semeniuk, M., Lemckert, F., and Shine, R. 2007. Breeding-site selection by cane toads (Bufo marinus) and native frogs in northern New South Wales, Australia. Wildlife Research 34: 59–66. Google Scholar

72.

Semlitsch, R. D. 2002. Critical elements for biologically based recovery plans of aquatic-breeding amphibians. Conservation Biology 16: 619–629. Google Scholar

73.

Shine, R. 2010. The ecological impact of invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus) in Australia. The Quarterly Review of Biology 85: 253–291. Google Scholar

74.

Shinohara, N. 1992. Bufo japonicus in Megi and Ogi Island, Takamatsu. Kagawa Seibutsu 19: 41–44. Google Scholar

75.

Simberloff, D., Martin, J. L., Genovesi, P., Maris, V., Wardle, D. A., Aronson, J., Courchamp, F., Galil, B., García-Berthou, E., Pascal, M., Pyšek, P., Sousa, R., Tabacchi, E., and Vilà, M. 2013. Impacts of biological invasions: what's what and the way forward. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28: 58–66. Google Scholar

76.

Sinsch, U. 1992. Amphibians. p. 213–233. In : F. Papi (ed.), Animal Homing. Springer, Dordrecht. Google Scholar

77.

Suzuki, A., Sarashina, M., and Yoshida, T. 2018. Examining the effects of invasive Japanese common toad (Bufo japonicus formosus) trapping on drift fense with large pit-falls in Ishikari Coast. Journal of Rakuno Gakuen University 43: 29–32. Google Scholar

78.

Tokuda, R. 2021. Establishment and effectiveness of the enclosure trap for the domestic invasive species Japanese common toad Bufo japonicus formosus: a case study in Hokkaido Prefecture. Bulletin of the Herpetological Society of Japan 1: 44–47. Google Scholar

79.

Uruma, H., Kobayashi, R., Nishijima, S., and Miyashita, T. 2012. Effectiveness of conservation-oriented agricultural practices on amphibians inhabiting Sado Island, Japan, with a consideration of spatial structure. Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology 17: 155–164. Google Scholar

80.

Vaira, M. 2005. Annual variation of breeding patterns of the toad, Melanophryniscus rubriventris (Vellard, 1947). Amphibia-Reptilia 26: 193–199. Google Scholar

81.

Van Bocxlaer, I., Loader, S. P., Roelants, K., Biju, S. D., Menegon, M., and Bossuyt, F. 2010. Gradual adaptation toward a range-expansion phenotype initiated the global radiation of toads. Science 327: 679–682. Google Scholar

82.

Wake, D. B. and Vredenburg, V. T. 2008. Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (Supplement 1): 11466–11473. Google Scholar

83.

Watabe, K., Nakashima, N., and Koizumi, N. 2021. Conservation of frog habitats for land consolidation projects in paddy field areas. Ecology and Civil Engineering Society 24: 95–110. Google Scholar

84.

Wells, K. D. 1977. The social behavior of anuran amphibians. Animal Behaviour 25: 666–693. Google Scholar

85.

Wen, L., Saintilan, N., Yang, X., Hunter, S., and Mawer, D. 2015. MODIS NDVI based metrics improve habitat suitability modelling in fragmented patchy floodplains. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment 1: 85–97. Google Scholar

86.

Wingate, D. B. 2011. The successful elimination of cane toads, Bufo marinus, from an island with breeding habitat off Bermuda. Biological Invasions 13: 1487–1492. Google Scholar

87.

Zheng, X., Natuhara, Y., Li, J., Li, G., Du, Y., Jia, H., Dai, Z., Du, D., Zhong, S., and Qin, D. 2021. Effects of multiple stressors on amphibian oviposition: Landscape and local determinants in central Japan. Ecological Indicators 128: 107824. Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix I

Confirmation of multicollinearity among explanatory variables using PCC. High collinearity was determined when PCC>0.75 and PCC<–0.75. The numbers shown in the upper right half of the figure indicate the correlation coefficients between the corresponding explanatory variables. The grey bars indicate the distribution of the corresponding explanatory variables. The graph in the lower left half of the figure shows the scatter plots among the corresponding explanatory variables.

img-z15-3_99.jpg

Appendix II

Confirmation of multicollinearity among explanatory variables using VIF. If the VIF between explanatory variables was less than 10, multicollinearity was not considered.

img-z16-3_99.gif

Appendix III

Data of the ponds where field surveys were conducted. Each valuable was measured as follows. B. j: Occurrence of Bufo japonicus formosus (absence: 0, presence: 1); Perimeter: (m); Depth: (cm); Material: (artificial: 0, natural: 1); Plant: Vegetation cover on the surface of the pond (%); Forest: Forest area within 100 m from survey ponds (m2); Rice: Rice paddy area within 100 m from survey ponds (m2).

img-z16-6_99.gif

(continued)

img-Az5N_99.gif
Kiyoto Sawada and Takashi Kamijo "The Preference of Domestic Alien Toads, Bufo japonicus formosus, for Spawning Ponds on Sado Island," Current Herpetology 42(2), 99-115, (25 August 2023). https://doi.org/10.5358/hsj.42.99
Accepted: 2 January 2023; Published: 25 August 2023
KEYWORDS
Breeding season
Bufo japonicus formosus
Domestic alien species
Sado Island
Spawning pond preference
Back to Top