BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 12 February 2025 between 18:00-21:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 March 2006 SELF-IMPOSED SILENCE: PARENTAL ANTAGONISM AND THE EVOLUTION OF X-CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION
David Haig
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A model is proposed for the evolution of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) in which natural selection initially favors the silencing of paternally derived alleles of X-linked demand inhibitors. The compensatory upregulation of maternally derived alleles establishes a requirement for monoallelic expression in females. For this reason, XCI is self-reinforcing once established. However, inactivation of a particular X chromosome is not. Random XCI (rXCI) is favored over paternal XCI because rXCI reduces the costs of functional hemizygosity in females. Once present, rXCI favors the evolution of locus-by-locus imprinting of X-linked loci, which creates an evolutionary dynamic in which different chromosomes compete to remain active.

David Haig "SELF-IMPOSED SILENCE: PARENTAL ANTAGONISM AND THE EVOLUTION OF X-CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION," Evolution 60(3), 440-447, (1 March 2006). https://doi.org/10.1554/05-474.1
Received: 22 August 2005; Accepted: 19 December 2005; Published: 1 March 2006
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

KEYWORDS
Dosage compensation
GENOMIC IMPRINTING
parental antagonism
SEXUAL ANTAGONISM
X-chromosome inactivation
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top