Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2017 Management of Hylesia nanus (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) on Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae) Plantations
Marcus V. Masson, Wagner de S. Tavares, Deivide W. V. Pereira, William C. Matos, Fabricio de A. Lopes, Pedro J. Ferreira-Filho, Carlos F. Wilcken, José C. Zanuncio
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The management of Hylesia nanus Walker (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae), a defoliator of Eucalyptus species (Myrtales: Myrtaceae), was evaluated on the northern coast of Bahia State, Brazil, by performing 3 connected experiments: (1) monitoring of H. nanus moths by using light traps; (2) biological control of H. nanus pupae by releasing the endoparasitoid Palmistichus elaeisis Delvare & La Salle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae); and (3) chemical control of H. nanus larvae with 1 spraying of bifenthrin etilenoxi. The light traps effectively assisted the monitoring and control of H. nanus moths, with a mean population peak (± SE) of 801 ± 438 individuals collected per trap in a 23 d nocturnal period. Palmistichus elaeisis was recovered from the H. nanus pupae 96 h post release, with a parasitism rate of 23 ± 3%, indicating an ability to parasitize and contribute to insect suppression. Release of this parasitoid can be integrated with monitoring using light traps. Chemical control was highly effective against the last instar H. nanus larvae, with only 11 ± 3 larval survivors per tree trunk 24 h post spraying. Thus, the monitoring of moths by using light traps, control of pupae by releasing P. elaeisis, and chemical control of last instar larvae are methods that could be integrated into a management plan for H. nanus.

Native plants of the family Myrtaceae are abundant in Brazil (Landrum & Kawasaki 1997). Larvae of Hylesia species (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) defoliate exotic and native plants of this family including species of eucalyptus (Eucalyptus; Myrtales: Myrtaceae) cultivated in Brazil (Pereira et al. 2006, 2009a; Dall'Oglio et al. 2013). Hylesia nanus Walker larvae display trailing behavior on the trunk of host plants with the individuals following the path of the insect ahead (Santos et al. 1988). Normally, Hylesia larvae remain on the trunk during the day and move to the canopy, where they consume the foliage, at night (Santos et al. 1996).

The presence of Saturniidae adults is monitored with light traps on eucalyptus plantations to determine when the application of control methods becomes necessary to prevent the build-up of large pest populations (Dall'Oglio et al. 2013; Ribeiro et al. 2016; Zanuncio et al. 2016a). Palmistichus elaeisis Delvare & La Salle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) is a generalist endoparasitoid that is easily mass reared in the laboratory using pupae of alternative hosts such as mealworms, Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). When released in the field, P. elaeisis has been reported to parasitize Citioica anthonilis (Herrich- Schäeffer) (Saturniidae: Ceratocampinae) on Piptadenia gonoacantha (Mart.) J. F. Macbr. (Fabales: Fabaceae) (Tavares et al. 2012) and Dirphia moderata Bouvier (Saturniidae: Hemileucinae) (Pereira et al. 2008) and Hylesia sp. pupae (Soares et al. 2009) on eucalyptus plantations. Palmistichus elaeisis is efficient at parasitizing Hylesia pupae during outbreaks of these pests on eucalyptus plantations (Soares et al. 2009). It is released in the field to control young Saturniidae pupae (Pereira et al. 2009b) though other stages are controlled by spraying insecticides.

The region at the northern coast of Bahia State produces the highest quality of cellulose, with 99% purity, from eucalyptus wood. Forest product companies should emphasize the use of monitoring and biological control and should use chemical control only when necessary to suppress pest populations using registered products (Zanuncio et al. 2016b). Hylesia nanus was the most severe lepidopteran defoliator of eucalyptus in the first half of 2015 in this region, and the severity and the time frame in which the defoliation happened stimulated this research. The objectives of this work were to monitor the adults of this species with light traps, to evaluate the pupal parasitism rate induced by release of P. elaeisis, and to assess the effectiveness of bifenthrin + etilenoxi treatment on larvae.

Materials and Methods

STUDY SITE

In Apr 2015, the monitoring system of the Copener Florestal Ltda. (Ltda. in Brazil is equivalent to LLC “Limited Liability Company” in the USA) in Alagoinhas, Bahia State, Brazil, reported the presence of last instar H. nanus larvae in a portion of stand 27 in the Encantado region, which has a total area of 34 ha (12.67°S, 38.40°W) and, in Mar and Apr 2015, the system indicated such larvae in a portion of stand 3 in the Água Santa region, which has a total area of 37 ha (12.50°S, 38.23°W). Young pupae were also reported in a portion of stand 3 in the Água Santa region in Mar and Apr 2015. Larvae of H. nanus had also been found in a portion of the Encantado region in Oct and Nov 2014. Trees on the eucalyptus plantations in the 2 regions were 3 m apart with 3 m between the rows. The infested clones (hybrids of the rose gums, Eucalyptus urophylla S. T. Blake, and Eucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden and E. urophylla; Myrtales: Myrtaceae) were about 5 yr old and had attained a height of about 25 m. Temperature and rainfall data were obtained from the nearest weather station, located approximately 10 km from the Encantado region and 8 km from the Água Santa region.

COLLECTION AND IDENTIFICATION OF THE ADULTS

About 200 larvae (100 larvae from both the Encantado and Água Santa regions) and 100 pupae from the Água Santa region were collected in the field, brought to the Entomology Laboratory of the Copener Florestal Ltda. in Alagoinhas, and transferred to wood and screen rearing cages (85 × 45 × 48 cm HWL) with branches of eucalyptus (hybrid of E. urophylla). The branches were replaced daily until the emergence of adults or natural enemies. This clone was chosen to feed the larvae because of its susceptibility to insect pests (Masson et al. 2009). The pupae developing from these larvae were placed in groups of 3 in 200 mL plastic containers with perforated plastic lids with mesh fabric hot glued over the openings. The pupae collected in the field were also placed in groups of 3 in similar 200 mL plastic containers. Three males and 3 females of the adults obtained from these pupae were killed with 70% ethanol, mounted, and sent to the Federal University of Paraná (UFPR) in Curitiba, Paraná State, Brazil, to be identified to species level.

BIOLOGICAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS

This experiment was performed at 25 ± 2 °C, 70 ± 12% RH, and a 12:12 h L:D photoperiod. Eighty larvae were collected from both Encantado and Água Santa regions; the resulting total of 160 H. nanus adults, were placed in wood and screen rearing cages (85 × 45 × 48 cm HWL) with adults separated by region. These cages were lined with white paper as a substrate for oviposition, and a 50 mL vial of 10% sugar solution with the opening covered by a cotton swab was placed on the bottom of each cage. Eggs were removed from the cages and placed with a moistened cotton pad in Petri dishes (15 cm diameter, 1.5 cm height) until larvae hatched.

Five hundred 1st instar H. nanus larvae obtained from insects collected in the Encantado and Água Santa regions (250 larvae per region) were individually placed in 200 mL plastic containers with the opening covered using mesh fabric affixed with hot glue. The larvae were fed ad libitum with mature eucalyptus leaves from a hybrid of E. urophylla. The leaves were taken from the middle-third canopy of 5 yr old trees and changed twice daily until the insects reached pre-pupa stage. Resulting pupae were transferred to plastic containers as previously described until adults emerged. The containers were cleaned as necessary.

The average duration of the pre-pupal and pupal stages and the length of female and male pupae from each region were evaluated. The sex of pupae was identified based on the external morphological characteristics of Lepidoptera (Tavares et al. 2013a). The emergence rate, sex ratio, and adult wing span were also determined.

MONITORING THE ADULTS IN THE ÁGUA SANTA REGION

In the Água Santa region, 5 “Luiz de Queiroz” model light traps, each with a 12 V Moura? battery, a 20 W white fluorescent Philips? lamp, and a 20 L capacity nylon bag to hold the insects collected, were installed 2 m above the ground in the interior of the plantation, where the outbreak was severe (Dall'Oglio et al. 2013). This light trap is effective for collecting moths of this group as demonstrated in the collection of Hylesia nigricans Berg (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) in Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil (Iserhard et al. 2007). These traps were installed 1 d after collecting the larvae and pupae in the field and were maintained until the number of adults collected fell below the damage level determined by the Copener Florestal Ltda.'s monitoring system: an average of 125 H. nanus adults collected from 7 p.m. to 5 a.m. in 5 light traps. The traps were left in the field for 10 h per day, and insects were removed from the bags daily. The total weight of 100 adults captured per trap was used to calculate the mean weight; mean weight of moths is routinely used by the company to estimate the number of adult moths captured by the light traps per day.

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AND NATURAL PARASITISM OF THE PUPAE IN THE ÁGUA SANTA REGION

About 1,500 females of the H. nanus pupae endoparasitoid, P. elaeisis, mated previously for 48 h and fed ad libitum with pure honey, were reared using up to 2-d-old T. molitor pupae as hosts in the laboratory at 25 ± 2 °C, 70 ± 12% RH and 12:12 h L:D photoperiod. On 18 Mar 2015 (date corresponding to the outbreak peak), these females were released near the trunk and 1.5 m above the base of 100 trees divided in 4 plots (25 trees per plot) infested by young pupae of H. nanus. About 5 females per pupa were released in the Água Santa region. No parasitoids were released in 4 plots (control), each with 25 similarly infested trees, 200 m away from the treated plots. We sampled 60 pupae (15 pupae per plot) from both the treated and untreated plots 96 h after the release to study the parasitism rate by P. elaeisis.

We also recorded the number of pupae collected as larvae and of pupae collected from the field in the Água Santa region with emergence of chalcidid and tachinid parasitoids. From these numbers, we calculated the percentage of natural parasitism.

CHEMICAL CONTROL AND NATURAL PARASITISM OF THE LARVAE IN THE ENCANTADO REGION

We designed the chemical control experiment based on results of our initial field observations. In the Encantado region, the insecticide bifenthrin (Talstar 100 EC; Food Machinery Corporation Química do Brasil Ltda., Campinas, Brazil) + spreader-sticker etilenoxi (Agral; Syngenta Proteção de Cultivos Ltda., Paulínia, Brazil) was applied between 8 and 10 a.m. at a rate of 30 mL per 100 L water by backpack sprayer with a fan-type nozzle, model XR110-02 (TeeJet Technologies, São Paulo, Brazil), to 4 plots of 25 trees until the trunks appeared wet. At 24 h after spraying, the numbers of surviving larvae found per trunk were recorded (Treatment 1). The control also had 4 plots with 25 trees per plot, but no insecticide treatment was applied (Treatment 2). The untreated plots were located 200 m from the insecticide-treated plots. A second replication was conducted in a similarly infested area of the Encantado region. The insecticide was applied to the trunk, on larvae located from base to around 2.5 m high; larvae located above this height were not sprayed because the backpack sprayer jet could not reach beyond 2.5 m. We compared the number of remaining larvae found per trunk in the test plots with the number found in the control plots 24 h after the experiment started by using 1-way ANOVA (R Development Core Team 2011). The effectiveness of the insecticide solution was calculated using Abbott's correction (Abbott 1925).

The number of field-collected larvae prior to spraying parasitized by chalcid and tachinid parasitoids (natural parasitism) that emerged from pupae was recorded in the laboratory after rearing. The parasitoids were identified to genus level using keys and taxonomic descriptions (Tavares et al. 2013b, 2014).

Results

FIELD OBSERVATIONS: FEATURES OF LARVAL SHELTERS AND FORAGING

We observed that H. nanus larvae build 2 types of shelters, the first comprised of leaf clusters and silk and located at the end of the branches (conical shape) and the other consisting of tree bark and silk and located on the tree trunks, particularly from the tree base to a height of 2.5 m. Although Hylesia larvae normally remain on trunks during the day and move to the canopy at night to consume foliage, at the high densities we found in the 2 studied regions, the larvae were feeding during the diurnal period. The drop of larval fecal material from the trees produced noticeable noise during the day.

BIOLOGICAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL PARAMETERS

The duration of the pre-pupal stadium in H. nanus was about 24 h (n = 100). Mean pupal length (± SE) was 22.6 ± 1.5 mm for males (n = 100) and 27.8 ± 7.9 mm for females (n = 100). The duration of the pupal stadium was 18.9 ± 1.5 d for males (n = 100) and 19.6 ± 1.5 d for females (n = 100). The emergence rate was 58% (n = 100) and 45% (n = 100) in the Encantado and Água Santa regions, respectively, with a female to male sex ratio of 45:55 (n = 100). The wingspan of the female insect was 46.6 ± 0.9 mm (n = 50) whereas for the male it was 37.3 ± 0.6 mm (n = 50).

MONITORING OF ADULTS AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF THE PUPAE

The numbers of adults collected by the light traps (N = 5) remained high for 2 wk. After that, it decreased dramatically, ending with an average of only 124 insects per trap in the last collection (Table 1). This last value is below the damage threshold according to the company's monitoring system. Rains were absent during the collection period, which corresponded to the month before the beginning of the first rains in the regions; the average temperature in the regions during the collection period was 30 °C. The rains in the regions began in the second half of Apr, so the insects were not observed for at least 3 mo; they were, however, observed prior to the rainy season. Hylesia nanus may occur during short periods (up to 1 mo) in periods throughout the year if not effectively controlled. The number of insects collected dropped off despite suitable weather for their survival.

In total, 120 H. nanus pupae (60 from both treated and control plots) were recovered from the field 96 h after the parasitoid release. The percentage of parasitism (± SE) in plots with parasitoid releases was 23 ± 3%, whereas no parasitism by P. elaeisis was detected in control plots.

Two species of flies of the genus Belvosia (Diptera: Tachinidae) emerged from the H. nanus pupae collected from the field. One species of Brachymeria (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae), a hyperparasitoid, emerged from the puparia of Tachinidae parasitizing H. nanus pupae. Emergence of Belvosia sp. 1 and Belvosia sp. 2 was 22 and 10%, respectively, of pupae from larvae collected in the Encantado region, 15 and 2%, respectively, of pupae from larvae collected in the Água Santa region, and 35 and 2%, respectively, of pupae collected in the Água Santa region. Emergence of Brachymeria sp. was 8% of pupae from larvae collected in the Encantado region, and 8 and 12% of pupae from larvae collected and pupae collected in the Água Santa region, respectively. Emergence of H. nanus was 58% of pupae from larvae collected in the Encantado region, and 72 and 45% of pupae from larvae collected and pupae collected in the Água Santa region, respectively.

CHEMICAL CONTROL OF THE LARVAE

Chemical control with a single application of bifenthrin + etilenoxi was highly effective against the last instar of H. nanus. In both replications, larval numbers were reduced by 99%. The number of larvae alive per trunk was significantly different between the treated and non-treated trees after 24 h (F = 3.79; df = 7; P < 0.001). The presence of larvae, even in small numbers, in the Encantado region 24 h post spraying with the insecticide could be due to the descent of larvae from unsprayed upper parts of the trunk to the sprayed bottom part of the trunk (below 2.5 m).

Discussion

The eucalyptus clones infested by H. nanus facilitate the construction of the shelters on their trunks by enabling the bark to become fragmented into pieces in vertical lines and to detach from the trunk. Clones with smooth trunks and those that release less bark could present a physical barrier, limiting shelter construction. The shelters were also observed in the trees above 2.5 m height although they were less numerous. These shelters appear to completely isolate the pre-pupae and pupae from the action of natural enemies. Tachinids were observed near the groups of unprotected larvae but not near the shelters. Conical-shaped shelters at the end of the branches seem to facilitate rainwater and insecticide solution run-off, which could affect insect mortality. The shelter types described for H. nanus were also reported in many other plants of the families Anacardiaceae (Sapindales), Aquifoliaceae (Aquifoliales), Euphorbiaceae (Malpighiales), Fabaceae (Fabales), Combretaceae, Lythraceae, Myrtaceae (Myrtales), and Rubiaceae (Gentianales) (Veloso 1951; Silva et al. 1968; Gonçalves & Gonçalves 1973; Santos et al. 1988, 1996).

Table 1.

Mean mass of Hylesia nanus (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) moths (± SE), total mass of moths captured, and estimated total number of moths captured by light traps in Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae) plantations.

t01_380.gif

The feeding of the H. nanus larvae on eucalyptus plants during the diurnal period suggests the extension of the foraging period; normally, their feeding is nocturnal (Santos et al. 1988). The duration of the life stages and the size parameters of H. nanus that feed on eucalyptus are similar to what was previously reported for H. nanus that feed on Joannesia princeps Vell. (Malpighiales: Euphorbiaceae) (Santos et al. 1988).

The ability to cause over 20% parasitism following release of parasitoids suggests that parasitoids could contribute to population reduction of the pest. Parasitoid release can be used in combination with light trap population monitoring and, if timed properly, might reduce the need for application of insecticides.

The high natural parasitism rate of H. nanus by Belvosia spp. suggests that these parasitoids may contribute to population reduction of this species, an effect that was reported for the parasitism of this pest by Belvosia bicincta Robineau-Desvoidy and Belvosia potens (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tachinidae) (Gonçalves & Gonçalves 1973, 1974; Guimarães 1977). The presence of Brachymeria sp. hyperparasitizing the pupae of Tachinidae parasitizing H. nanus may be unfavorable because it could reduce the efficiency of biological control by the tachinid parasitoid. A similar effect was observed for Brachymeria koehleri Blanchard (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae) as a hyperparasitoid of Lespesia melloi sp. nov. Gil-Santana, Nihei & Nunez (Diptera: Tachinidae) pupae in the larvae of snow white, Thagona tibialis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) defoliating tropical almond, Terminalia catappa L. (Myrtales: Combretaceae) in Brazil, a shade tree grown across the world (Tavares et al. 2013b). In Mapire, Venezuela, the parasitism rate on ashen moth, Hylesia metabus (Cramer) (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) increased from 33.0 to 91.1% in the third cycle studied, with Belvosia spp., Sarcodexia lambens (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), and species of Ichneumonidae, Chalcididae, Perilampidae, and Eulophidae being the most common (Hernandéz et al. 2009). In Pedernales, Venezuela, the parasitism rate decreased from 29.5 to 16.1% and Belvosia spp. were the most abundant parasitoids, reaching levels of parasitism between 70.7 and 96.2% (Hernandéz et al. 2009).

In summary, we presented some of the biological and behavioral aspects of H. nanus, including the extension of the foraging larval period for the diurnal duration and the construction of peculiarly shaped shelters, because this information may help in the management of this species. Light traps can be used in the monitoring and capture of adults. This tool can be integrated with the release of natural enemies like P. elaeisis, which was recovered from the field parasitizing the young pupae of the pest. Chemical control should not be ignored but used to control larvae and old pupae in severe infestations, especially on the late instar larvae, with a single spray treatment of bifenthrin + etilenoxi being sufficient to cause 99% mortality. The monitoring and control methods studied for H. nanus can be included in an integrated management plan for this pest on eucalyptus forest plantations.

Acknowledgments

We thank Olaf Hermann Hendrik Mielke for identifying the Lepidoptera and Mr. Miler, Mr. Uashinton, and Mr. Edivaldo (Bahia Specialty Cellulose/Copener Florestal Ltda.) for monitoring pests and controlling trials in the field. This study was funded by the following Brazilian institutions: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG), and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP). GlobalEdico from India edited the English of an early version of this manuscript.

References Cited

1.

Abbott WS. 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology 18: 265–267. Google Scholar

2.

Dall'Oglio OT, Zanuncio TV, Tavares WS, Serrão JE, Wilcken CF, Zanuncio JC. 2013. Atlantic rainforest remnant harbors greater biotic diversity but reduced lepidopteran populations compared to a Eucalyptus plantation. Florida Entomology 96: 887–896. Google Scholar

3.

Gonçalves CR, Gonçalves AJL. 1973. Novas observações sobre insetos hospedeiros de moscas da família Tachinidae (Diptera). Agronomia 31: 9–15. Google Scholar

4.

Gonçalves CR, Gonçalves AJL. 1974. Novas observações sobre moscas da família Tachinidae que parasitam lepidópteros. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 34: 531–553. Google Scholar

5.

Guimarães JH. 1977. Host-parasite and parasite-host catalogue of South American Tachinidae (Diptera). Arquivos de Zoologia 28: 1–331. Google Scholar

6.

Hernandéz JV, Osborn F, Herrera B, Liendo-Barandiaran CV, Perozo J, Velásquez D. 2009. Larvae-pupae parasitoids of Hylesia metabus Cramer (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) in northeastern Venezuela: a case of natural biological control. Neotropical Entomology 38: 243–250. Google Scholar

7.

Iserhard CA, Kaminski LA, Marchiori MO, Teixeira EC, Romanowski HP. 2007. Occurrence of lepidopterism caused by the moth Hylesia nigricans (Berg) (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) in Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Neotropical Entomology 36: 612–615. Google Scholar

8.

Landrum LR, Kawasaki ML. 1997. The genera of Myrtaceae in Brazil: An illustrated synoptic treatment and identification keys. Brittonia 49: 508–536. Google Scholar

9.

Masson MV, Matos WC, Silva AGP, Alves JM, Ribeiro GT, Wilcken CF. 2009. Occurrence and population distribution of red gum lerp psyllid Glycaspis brimblecombei Moore 1964, (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in eucalyptus forests in the North coast of Bahia State, Brazil. Boletin de Sanidad Vegetal Plagas 35: 559–562. Google Scholar

10.

Pereira AIA, Curvelo CRS, Guerra AMNM, Andrade GS, Zanuncio JC. 2006. Eucalyptus cloeziana as a new host to Hylesia paulex (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) in southeast Brazil. Revista Caatinga 22: 1–5. Google Scholar

11.

Pereira AIA, Zanuncio VV, Lorenzon AS, Bolognani H, Fernandes BV, Mielke OHH, Serrão JE, Zanuncio JC. 2009a. Biological and morphological characteristics of Hylesia paulex (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) fed with Eucalyptus urophylla (Myrtaceae). Interciencia 34: 645–649. Google Scholar

12.

Pereira AIA, Zanuncio JC, Gil-Santana HR, Ramalho FS, Leite GLD, Serrão JE. 2009b. Harpactor angulosus (Reduviidae: Harpactorinae), a predator of Neotropical saturniids, Hylesia spp. in Brazil. Entomological News 120: 206–212. Google Scholar

13.

Pereira FF, Zanuncio TV, Zanuncio JC, Pratissoli D, Tavares MT. 2008. Species of Lepidoptera defoliators of Eucalyptus as new host for the parasitoid Palmistichus elaeisis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 51: 259–262. Google Scholar

14.

R Development Core Team. 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria,  http://www.R-project.org/ (last accessed 21 Oct 2016). Google Scholar

15.

Ribeiro GT, Zanuncio JC, Tavares WS, Ramalho FS, Serrão JE. 2016. Constancy, distribution, and frequency of Lepidoptera defoliators of Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus urophylla (Myrtaceae) in four Brazilian regions. Neotropical Entomology 45: 629–636. Google Scholar

16.

Santos GP, Anjos N, Zanuncio JC. 1988. Biologia de Hylesia nanus (Walker, 1855) (Lepidoptera: Attacidae), desfolhadora da cutieira (Joannesia princeps: Euphorbiaceae). Revista Ceres 35: 479–485. Google Scholar

17.

Santos GP, Zanuncio TV, Dias OS, Zanuncio JC. 1996. Biologia de Hylesia nanus (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Attacidae). Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil 25: 479–482. Google Scholar

18.

Silva AGDA, Gonçalves CR, Galvão DM, Gonçalves AJL, Gomes J, Silva MM, Simoni L. 1968. Quarto catálogo dos insetos que vivem nas plantas do Brasil, seus parasitos e predadores. Parte II - I.fi01_380.gif Tomo-Insetos, hospedeiros e inimigos naturais. Rio de Janeiro, Ministério da Agricultura, Departamento de Defesa e Inspeção Agropecuária. Google Scholar

19.

Soares MA, Gutierrez CT, Zanuncio JC, Pedrosa ARP, Lorenzon AS. 2009. Superparasitism by Palmistichus elaeisis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) and defense behaviors of two hosts. Revista Colombiana de Entomología 35: 62–65. Google Scholar

20.

Tavares WS, Mielke OHH, Wilcken CF, Simon L, Serrão JE, Zanuncio JC. 2012. Palmistichus elaeisis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) parasitizing pupae of Citioica anthonilis (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) collected on Piptadenia gonoacantha (Fabaceae). Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 66: 216–220. Google Scholar

21.

Tavares WS, Freitas SS, Teles AM, Grael CFF, Assis Júnior SL, Liao LM, Serrão JE, Zanuncio JC. 2013a. Potential of aromatic and medicinal plant extracts from Cerrado biome to control the velvetbean caterpillar Anticarsia gemmatalis. Boletín Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Plantas Medicinales y Aromáticas 12: 372–384. Google Scholar

22.

Tavares WS, Legaspi JC, Tavares MT, Nunez E, Pinto R, Zanuncio JC. 2013b. Brachymeria koehleri (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae) as a hyperparasitoid of Lespesia melloi (Diptera: Tachinidae) pupae in Thagona tibialis (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) caterpillars in Brazil. Florida Entomologist 96: 1635–1638. Google Scholar

23.

Tavares WS, Nunez E, Serrão JE, Soares MA, Wilcken CF, Zanuncio JC. 2014. Belvosia sp. (Diptera: Tachinidae) parasitizing Halysidota sp. (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) caterpillars on Ficus benjamina (Moraceae) in Brazil. Florida Entomologist 97: 272–277. Google Scholar

24.

Veloso LGC. 1951. Sobre a ocorrência de Hylesia sp. nos ervais do Paraná. Ciência e Cultura 3: 33–33. Google Scholar

25.

Zanuncio JC, Tavares WS, Ramalho FS, Leite GLD, Serrão JE. 2016a. Sarsina violascens spatial and temporal distribution influenced by native vegetation strips in eucalyptus plantations. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 51: 703–709. Google Scholar

26.

Zanuncio JC, Lemes PG, Antunes LR, Maia JLS, Mendes JEP, Tanganelli KM, Salvador JF, Serrão JE. 2016b. The impact of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) pesticide policy on the management of leaf-cutting ants and termites in certified forests in Brazil. Annals of Forest Science 73: 205–214. Google Scholar
Marcus V. Masson, Wagner de S. Tavares, Deivide W. V. Pereira, William C. Matos, Fabricio de A. Lopes, Pedro J. Ferreira-Filho, Carlos F. Wilcken, and José C. Zanuncio "Management of Hylesia nanus (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) on Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae) Plantations," Florida Entomologist 100(2), 380-384, (1 June 2017). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.100.0239
Published: 1 June 2017
KEYWORDS
armadilha luminosa
chemical control
controle químico
light trap
Palmistichus elaeisis
Tachinidae
Back to Top