Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2017 The Response of Phyllophaga brevidens and Phyllophaga lenis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) to Methyl 2-(Methylthio) Benzoate and Light
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A sexual attractant of some Phyllophaga species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae), methyl 2-(methylthio)benzoate, was studied alone and in combination with light from a solar-powered light-emitting diode (LED) to determine their comparative attraction potential for Phyllophaga species in a sugarcane crop. Four trap treatments were evaluated: sex attractant, sex attractant plus light, light alone, and a control trap without attractant or light. The number and species of Phyllophaga captured were determined over two 5 mo adult emergence periods from Mar–Jul in 2014 and 2015. Additionally, the cytochrome oxidase I (CO1) gene of the species that responded to the compound was amplified, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using those sequences and sequences found in GenBank. Two species of Phyllophaga, Phyllophaga brevidens (Bates) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) and Phyllophaga lenis (Horn) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), responded to the compound. The traps with sex attractant plus light treatment captured significantly more beetles than the other treatments. Our results suggest that the combination of methyl 2-(methylthio)benzoate and light can be a relatively selective method for the capture of the males of these species of agricultural importance, and it also attracts some females. Finally, analysis of the sequences of the mitochondrial CO1 gene showed that the Phyllophaga species captured with this compound were phylogenetically related.

The genus Phyllophaga (sensu lato) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae), commonly known as May or June beetles as adults and white grubs in the larval stage, are major pests of many crops. Whereas adults attack the foliage, immature stages have a higher economic impact because they feed on the roots and cause wilting and plant death (Riess & Flores 1976; Morón 1986). In Mexico, severe damage caused by white grubs is most frequent in maize and sugarcane crops. In Tamaulipas, Mexico losses in maize production can reach 48% (Villalobos 1998), whereas in Morelos State losses are equivalent to about 32% (Villalobos et al. 2001; Núñez-Valdez et al. 2002).

Use of pheromones for the attraction of Coleoptera is widely known. Numerous compounds are based mainly on isopropenoid derivatives, fatty acids, and amino acids (Tillman et al. 1999). In the case of Phyllophaga, Pherobase (2016) (a semiochemical and pheromone database) cites 20 compounds attractive to Phyllophaga, including palmitic, linoleic, and stearic acids. Other authors also mention 1-octadecanol, 11-n-decyl tetracosane (Romero-López et al. 2003), methyl ester of L-isoleucine (Zhang et al. 1997; Leal et al. 2003; Nojima et al. 2003), and methyl 2-(methylthio)benzoate (Robbins et al. 2003; Robbins et al. 2006; Robbins et al. 2011; Morales-Rodríguez et al. 2011). Methyl 2-(methylthio)benzoate was reported by Coca-Abia and Robbins (2006) and Robbins et al. (2011) as a sexual attractant though it attracts more than 1 Phyllophaga species. They also suggest that the attraction to this compound could be used to establish phylogenetic relationships among the species that are attracted.

Use of light traps is a common technique for capturing adult Melolonthinae (Alcazar-Ruiz et al. 2003; Aragón-García et al. 2008; Lugo-García et al. 2011; Hernández-Cruz et al. 2014); however, such traps have shortcomings such as their dependence on electricity or batteries. These drawbacks could hinder the use of lights in areas lacking electricity, or when operating costs are affected by daily battery changes. Therefore, use of solar-powered light might be a promising alternative for trapping these pests. Here, we report the effectiveness of the sexual attractant methyl 2-(methylthio)benzoate, alone and in combination with a light source, to capture Phyllophaga species in a sugarcane crop. Additionally, the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (CO1) gene from the captured insects was used to determine if the species that responded to this compound were closely related.

Materials and Methods

This research was conducted in the town of San Miguel Treinta, Tlaltizapan, Morelos, Mexico, which is located at 18.718500°N and 99.180611°W. The altitude is 990 m asl, and the climate is warm subhumid. Annual average temperature is 23.5 °C; annual rainfall is 840 mm, and the rainy season is from Jun to Oct (INEGI 2010).

The traps were constructed from plastic trays of 5 L capacity and 35 cm diameter. Plastic caps of similar diameter were held with 2.5 cm wide aluminum strips separated by 20 cm. A 12 cm wide hole was made in the center of the plastic caps, and a 1.2 V light-emitting diode (LED) lamp attached to a 5.4 × 4 cm solar cell was inserted. In the traps baited with 1 mg of methyl 2-(methylthio)benzoate (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, California) sexual attractant, a rubber septum containing the lure was placed inside at the top of the plastic caps. During the collection period, water with detergent was placed in the trap to retain the collected specimens.

The treatments were methyl 2-(methylthio)benzoate sexual attractant; solar-powered LED light; sexual attractant plus light; and neither sexual attractant or light (control). The response variable was the number of Phyllophaga adults collected, by species, for each treatment. The collected specimens were preserved in alcohol for morpho-specific classification, assembly, and identification. The sexual attractant was replenished every 30 d. The experiment had a completely randomized design with 4 treatments and 3 replications. The treatments were evaluated during 2 adult emergence periods from Mar–Jul of 2014 and 2015. Within each emergence period, collections were made on 8 dates. The traps were set in a 1 ha sugarcane field of cultivar MY 55-14. The data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a 95% confidence level (α = 0.05) and Tukey multiple comparison tests (α = 0.05) with SAS® software (SAS Institute Inc. 2004).

CO1 GENE AMPLIFICATION

Samples for total DNA extraction was obtained from the thorax and legs of Phyllophaga lenis (Horn) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) and Phyllophaga brevidens (Bates) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) after morphological identification. The DNA extraction method used was the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB 2%) method according to Black & DuTeau (1997). A 658 bp fragment of the CO1 gene was amplified with LCO1490 forward and HCO2198 reverse primers, designed by Folmer et al. (1994) and proposed as a biological identification system for animals by Hebert et al. (2003). The PCR amplification was performed in a thermocycler (Thermo Scientific®, Waltham, Massachusetts) according to the following program: an initial 95 °C denaturation step for 2 min; 30 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 95 °C, annealing at 51 °C for 50 s , and extension at 72 °C for 1 min; and a final extension step of 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR amplified products were sent to the company Macrogen (Korea) for sequencing in the forward and reverse direction.

SEQUENCE ANALYSIS

The sequences obtained were assembled with the Sequencher® 5.4.1 software (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, Michigan) and aligned with ClustalW in MEGA 6.06 (Tamura et al. 2013). Comparison with other sequences was done with BLASTN (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) at the nucleotide NCBI database by genus and gene analyzed. Altogether, 29 sequences of the barcode region of the CO1 gene from the captured Phyllophaga species were used for phylogenetic analysis, and Caryedon gonagra (F.) KP216604 was used as the outgroup. The amino acid translation was done using the invertebrate's mitochondria genetic code (NCBI-The Genetic Codes); then, before phylogenetic inference from DNA, the probabilities of change between nucleotides was accessed by a nucleotide substitution models test with MEGA 6.06 (Tamura et al. 2013)(free online software) , to reduce biases in the DNA evolutionary changes estimation (Posadas 2009)

The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood method with the general time reversible (GTR) model, with a gamma distribution, and invariant sites (GTR + G + I) resulted from the nucleotide substitution models test; this means that the data set for the analysis had an unequal base frequency and all pair substitution rates have different frequencies (GTR), with different substitution rates among sites (G) and different proportions of invariables sites (I) (Posadas 2009), and 500 bootstrap replicates (Felsenstein 1985). The sequences generated from this research were deposited at the NCBI Nucleotide GenBank with the accession numbers KX271883 to KX271888.

Results

During the 2 trapping seasons, 349 Phyllophaga adults were captured. The sex ratio of the collected insects was 93.4% male and 6.6% female. The species of the females were not determined. Captured males were P. brevidens and P. lenis. Males of P. brevidens were captured more frequently during the trapping, and the treatment with the greatest number of captures was attractant plus light. Males of the both species and a few females were collected in this treatment (Fig. 1, Supplemental Table 1). The numbers of insects collected using the different techniques during the 2 sampling periods were: sex attractant, 53; sex attractant plus light, 280; light, 16; and control, 0. During the 2014 collection period, 255 adult specimens were captured (240 males and 15 females). During the 2015 collection period, only 94 adults were captured.

The ANOVA showed significant differences in beetle captures among treatments. The attractant plus light treatment caught more beetles than the other treatments, and the other treatments were not statistically different (Table 1).

CO1 GENE ANALYSIS

Comparative analysis of the sequences from the collected insects with the BAST search tool at the NCBI database resulted in 27 species and 160 sequences for the mitochondrial CO1 gene for the genus Phyllophaga. Only 2 of the 5 species that have been reported to respond to methyl 2-(methylthio)benzoate were found in the database. The phylogenetic tree constructed using the CO1 gene sequences from the 27 Phyllophaga species grouped P. brevidens and P. lenis with P. tristis (F.) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae) and P. crinita (Burmeister) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae), with a bootstrap value of 92% (Fig. 2). These species belong to the Anodentata group, as described by Horn (1887) and Morón (1986). These results support the hypothesis that the species captured with this compound are phylogenetically related.

Fig. 1.

Numbers of Phyllophaga brevidens and Phyllophaga lenis adults trapped per species, sex, and treatment during 2 sampling periods in Tlaltizapan, Morelos, Mexico. A = attractant, L= light, C = control, M = males, F = females, nd = not determined.

f01_546.jpg

Discussion

Methyl 2-(methylthio)benzoate attracted 2 Phyllophaga species in Morelos: P. brevidens and P. lenis. These species can be added to the growing list of Phyllophaga species responsive to this sex attractant. The use of this compound in combination with LED lights increased the number of insects 5 fold as compared to the attractant only. Additionally, a few females were also collected when the lights were incorporated into the traps. The attraction of Phyllophaga species females has not been reported by previous researchers that used this attractant. However, similar results have been observed in other species when light and attractants are used together (Monserrat 2008). Hence, the use of solar-powered LED lights might be a useful tool for capturing these species in the crop areas lacking electricity. Therefore, this system can be used as part of integrated pest management.

Table 1.

Mean numbers of male Phyllophaga captured with different traps during 2 sampling periods (Mar–Jul 2014 and 2015) in Tlaltizapan, Morelos.

t01_546.gif

The response of more than 1 species to this attractant is consistent with results by Robbins et al. (2011) and Morales-Rodriguez et al. (2011). Both studies also reported that this compound attracted more than 1 species. The species caught with this attractant in Morelos, P. brevidens and P. lenis, are different than reported previously: Phyllophaga crinita in Dallas, Texas (Robbins et al. 2003); P. tristis in Greensburg, Kansas; P. apicata Reinhard (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae) in Gainesville, Texas (Robbins et al. 2011); and P. menetriesi (Blanchard) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthidae) and P. lissopyge (Bates) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae) in South America (Morales-Rodriguez et al. 2011). All the species captured belong to genus Phyllophaga, and most of these species are included in the anodentata group (Morón 1986).

The results of this research show that methyl 2-(methylthio)benzoate can be used in combination with solar-powered LED lights to increase the capture of certain Phyllophaga spp. Zaragoza-Ortega et al. (2016) reported additional Phyllophaga spp. present in the same area during those years, so this attractant seems to provide some degree of selectivity and may be useful to reduce the time and labor associated with sorting through trap captures to determine the abundance of P. brevidens and P. lenis.

Fig. 2.

Phylogenetic tree of Phyllophaga species according to the cytochrome oxidase 1 gene, determined using the maximum likelihood method, with the general time reversible with a gamma distribution and invariant sites (GTR + G + I) nucleotide substitution model, and 500 bootstrap repetitions. The species caught in Morelos are shown in boldface.

f02_546.jpg

Phylogenetic analysis of nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial CO1 gene from this study and GenBank showed that the Phyllophaga species caught with methyl 2-(methylthio)benzoate are closely related. The sharing of a response to an attractant can help us to understand the evolution and diversification process of the species (Coca-Abia and Robbins 2006; Robbins et al. 2011).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) for granting the first author a scholarship for MC studies; the Microbial, Plant and Animal Biotechnology Priority Line, 2014 at Colegio de Postgraduados (CP); the “Plagues of Sugarcane” Project for financial support granted in 2014 to carry out this research; Juan Cibrián Tovar at Colegio de Postgraduados for facilitating materials for field experiments; José A. Sánchez G. for assistance provided by the CIIDIR Oaxaca Entomological Collection used to determine the Phyllophaga specimens; and Armando Ramos Gómez for his support in field work.

References Cited

1.

Alcazar-Ruiz JA, Morón-Ríos A, Morón MA. 2003. Fauna de Coleóptera Melolonthidae, de Villa de las Rosas, Chiapas, México. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (Nueva Serie) 88: 59–86. Google Scholar

2.

Aragón-García AC, Nochebuena-Trujillo D, Morón MA, López-Olguín JF. 2008. Uso de trampas de luz fluorescente para el manejo de gallina ciega (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae) en maíz (Zea mays L.). Agrociencia 48: 217–223. Google Scholar

3.

Black IV, W.C. DuTeau NM. 1997. RAPD-PCR and SSCP analysis for insect population genetics studies, pp. 361–373 In Crampton JM, Beard CB, Louis C [eds.], The Molecular Biology of Insect Disease Vectors: A Methods Manual, Chapman & Hall, New York, New York. Google Scholar

4.

Coca-Abia MM, Robbins PS. 2006. Taxonomy and phylogeny of a new Central American beetle genus Catrachia (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Revista de Biología Tropical 54: 519–529. Google Scholar

5.

Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791. Google Scholar

6.

Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek, R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3: 294–299. Google Scholar

7.

Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270: 313–321. Google Scholar

8.

Hernández-Cruz J, Morón MA, Ruiz-Vega J, Sánchez-García JA, Martínez-Martínez L, Pérez-Pacheco R. 2014. Bionomía de las especies de Phyllophaga (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae) en Santa Cruz Xoxocotlán, Oaxaca, México. Acta Zoologica Mexicana 30: 144–160. Google Scholar

9.

Horn GH. 1887. Revision of the species of Lachnosterna of America north of Mexico. Transactions of the American Entomological Society. 14:209–296. Google Scholar

10.

INEGI. 2010. División municipal, Morelos,  http://www.cuentame.inegi.org.mx/monografias/informacion/mor/territorio/div_municipal.aspx?tema=me&e=17 (last accessed in Dec 2015). Google Scholar

11.

Leal WS, Oehlschlager AC, Zarbin PHG, Hidalgo E, Shannon PJ, Murata Y, González L, Andrade R, Ono M. 2003. Sex pheromone of the scarab beetle Phyllophaga elenans and some intriguing minor components. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29: 15–25. Google Scholar

12.

Lugo-García GA, Morón MA, Reyes-Olivas A, Aragón-García A, Ortega-Arenas LD, Cota-Sánchez H. 2011. Riqueza de escarabajos con hábitos nocturnos (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) en islas de las bahías de Ohuira y Navachiste, Sinaloa, México. Dugesiana 18: 1–10. Google Scholar

13.

Jukes TH, Osawa S. 1990. The genetic code in mitochondria and chloroplasts. Experientia 46: 1117–1126 Google Scholar

14.

Monserrat DA. 2008. La Palomilla del tomate, “Tuta absoluta” en la región de Murcia: bases para su control. Consejeria de Agricultura y agua, Región de Murcia, Spain. Google Scholar

15.

Morales-Rodríguez A, Peck DC, Robbins PS. 2011. First record of the scarab beetle, Phyllophaga lissopyge from South America, with descriptions of adult seasonal activity and male response to sex attractants. Journal of Insect Science: 11: 23. Google Scholar

16.

Morón MA. 1986. El género Phyllophaga en México. Morfología, Distribución y Sistemática Supraespecífica (Insecta: Coleoptera), Publicación 20. Instituto de Ecología, México. Google Scholar

17.

Nojima S, Robbins PS, Salsbury GA, Morris BD, Roelofs WL, Villani MG. 2003. L-leucine methyl ester: the female-produced sex pheromone of the scarab beetle Phyllophaga lanceolata. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29: 2439–2446. Google Scholar

18.

Núñez-Valdez ME, Romero A, Arzuffi RA, Llanos AL, Valdés ME, Figueroa R, Villalobos FJ. 2002. Agrobiotecnología aplicada al manejo integrado de plagas subterráneas: un enfoque promisorio para el manejo de la gallina ciega (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) y el picudo negro del nardo y agave (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), pp. 139–157 En Métodos Para la Generación de Tecnología de Punta. Aragón A, López-Olguín JF, Tornero MC [eds], Publicación Especial de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla. Puebla. Google Scholar

19.

Pherobase. 2016.  http://www.pherobase.com (last accessed in Jan 2016), Google Scholar

20.

Riess CM, Flores S. 1976. Catálogo de plagas y enfermedades de la caña de azúcar en México. Comisión Nacional de la Industria Azucarera, Instituto para el Mejoramiento de la Producción de Azúcar, México. Google Scholar

21.

Robbins PS, Crocker RL, Nojima S, Morris BD, Roelofs WL, Villani MG 2003. Methyl 2-(methylthio) benzoate: the unique sulfur-containing sex pheromone of Phyllophaga crinita. Naturwissenschaften 90: 517–520. Google Scholar

22.

Robbins PS, Alm SR, Armstrong C, Averill AL, Baker TC, Bauernfiend RJ, Baxendale FP, Braman SK, Brandenburg RL, Cash DB, Couch GJ, Cowles RS, Crocker RL, DeLamar ZD, Dittl TG, Fitzpatrick SM, Flanders KL, Forgatsch T, Gibb TJ, Gill BD, Gilrein DO, Gorsuch CS, Hammond AM, Hastings PD, Held DW, Heller PR, Hiskes RT, Holliman JL, Hudson WG, Klein MG, Krischik VL, Lee DJ, Linn CE Jr , Luce NJ, MacKenzie KE, Mannion CM, Polavarapu S, Potter DA, Roelofs WL, Royals BM, Salsbury GA, Schiff NM, Shetlar DJ, Skinner M, Sparks BL, Sutschek JA, Sutschek TP, Swier SR, Sylvia MM, Vickers NJ, Vittum PJ, Weidman R, Weber DC, Williamson RC, Villani MG. 2006. Trapping Phyllophaga spp. (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae) in the United States and Canada using sex attractants. Journal of Insect Science 6: 39. Google Scholar

23.

Robbins PS, Salsbury GA, Woodruff RE, Lapointe SL, Linn CE Jr. 2011. Methyl 2-(methylthio)benzoate: a sex attractant for the June beetles, Phyllophaga tristis and P. apicata. Journal of Insect Science 11: 108. Google Scholar

24.

Romero-López AA, Arzuffi R, Villalobos FJ, Morón MA. 2003. Comportamiento sexual de Phyllophaga obsoleta. (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae), pp. 197–202 In Entomología Mexicana. Romero-Nápoles J, Estrada EG, Equihua A, [eds.]. Publicación especial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Entomología México, Volume 2. Google Scholar

25.

Posadas D. 2009. Selection of models of DNA evolution with JModel Test, p. 537 In David Posadas [ed.], Bioinformatics for DNA Sequence Analysis, Methods in Molecular Biology. Humana Press a part of Springer Science-Business Media LLC. Google Scholar

26.

SAS Institute Inc. 2004. SAS/STAT® Software Version 9.1.3 User's Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina. Google Scholar

27.

Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6 : Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 2725–2729. Google Scholar

28.

Tillman JA, Seybold SJ, Jurenka RA, Blomquist GJ. 1999. Insect pheromones and overview of biosynthesis and endocrine regulation. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 29: 481–514. Google Scholar

29.

Villalobos FJ. 1998. Bioecology and sustainable management of white grubs (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae) pest of corn in “El Cielo” Biosphere Reserve, Tamaulipas, México, pp 173–184 In Morón MA, Aragón A. [eds]. Avances en el Estudio de la Diversidad, Importancia y Manejo de los Coleópteros Edafícolas Americanos. Publicacion Especial de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla y la Sociedad Mexicana de Entomología, Puebla, México. Google Scholar

30.

Villalobos FJ, Romero-López A, Núñez-Valdez ME. 2001. Diagnóstico del problema causado por gallina ciega en cultivos de maíz del Estado de Morelos. En Memorias del 1er Simposium de Manejo Integrado de Plagas del Estado de Morelos. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Morelos, México. Google Scholar

31.

Zaragoza-Ortega M, Hernández-Cruz J, Morón MA, Valdez-Carrasco J, Sánchez-Soto S, Segura-León O. 2016. Phyllophaga en la Zona Cañera de Morelos, México. Southwestern Entomologist 41: 453–468. Google Scholar

32.

Zhang A, Robbins PS, Leal WS, Linn Jr CE, Villani MG, Roelofs WL. 1997. Essential amino acid methyl esters: major sex pheromone components of the cranberry white grub, Phyllophaga anxia (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 23: 231–245. Google Scholar
Monica Zaragoza-Ortega, Obdulia L. Segura-León, Julián Hernández-Cruz, Jorge Valdez-Carrasco, and Saúl Sánchez-Soto "The Response of Phyllophaga brevidens and Phyllophaga lenis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) to Methyl 2-(Methylthio) Benzoate and Light," Florida Entomologist 100(3), 546-550, (1 September 2017). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.100.0309
Published: 1 September 2017
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top