Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2017 Lethal and Sub-Lethal Effects of Beauveria bassiana (Cordycipitaceae) Strain NI8 on Chrysoperla rufilabris (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)
Maribel Portilla, Gordon Snodgrass, Randall Luttrell
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A Mississippi Delta native strain (NI8 ARSEF8889) of Beauveria bassiana (Bals.-Criv.) Vuill. (Cordycipitaceae), isolated from Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois) (Hemiptera: Miridae), was tested on green lacewings, Chrysoperla rufilabris (Burmeister) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) at 4 spray concentrations (7.02 × 104, 105, 106, and 107 spores per mL) to evaluate effects on reproductive rates and adult life expectancy of this insect predator. The application method simulated atomized spray, and concentrations tested were similar to those used to measure impacts of the fungus on L. lineolaris. Significant effects of B. bassiana on C. rufilabris adults were found, and the severity of impact depended on the concentrations tested. Beauveria bassiana impacted all demographic measurements of C. rufilabris reproduction and survival. Intrinsic and finite rates of increase and gross and net reproductive rates of adults treated with the highest concentrations tested were significantly decreased, whereas doubling time increased for adults treated with the lowest test concentrations. Based on these observations, C. rufilabris will be affected by sprays of B. bassiana targeted at L. lineolaris if adults are present at the time and location of treatment. The measured lethal concentration, LC50, of 2.11 viable spores per mm2 compares to an LC50 of 2.75 spores per mm2 determined previously for L. lineolaris. Higher concentrations of spores per mm2 were required for sporulation (SR50) of the entomopathogenic fungus on C. rufilabris (13.60 viable spores per mm2) than concentrations required for mortality (LC50).

The entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana (Bals.-Criv.) Vuill. (Cordycipitaceae) has great potential as a biological control agent against many insect pests of agricultural importance especially those with piercing-sucking mouth parts that do not consume biological control agents applied to the surface of host plants (Thungrabeab & Togma 2007). This hyphomycete fungus with contact activity has been employed worldwide with success, and interest in its use has increased as evidenced by the number of commercial products available and under development (Butt et al. 2001; Jaronski 2014). Today, there are more than 40 products based on the entomopathogenic fungus B. bassiana, but only 11 are commercially available worldwide. In the United States, there are 4 B. bassiana mycoinsecticides currently registered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Jaronski 2014). Commercial mycoinsecticides can regulate insect populations through inundative and inoculative application (Mahdavi et al. 2013). Beauveria bassiana has a number of positive attributes including potential mortality of up to 80% of the targeted pest population, great diversity and high genetic variability among different strains, potential infection of different stages of the targeted pest host, cutaneous penetration through the integument, and capacity for horizontal and vertical dispersal depending on the host pest environment involved (Destefano et al. 2004; Jaronsky 2014).

Host-predator-entomopathogen interactions in agricultural systems can be synergistically or antagonistically harmful to beneficial arthropods, other non-target insects, and ecological communities (Fuentes-Contreras & Niemeyer 2000; Roy & Cottrell 2008; Meyling et al. 2011). Therefore, the successful use of B. bassiana for targeted pest control depends not only on high efficacy against insect pests, but also potential selectivity and low virulence against non-target insects. There are several studies that have demonstrated that B. bassiana has been employed with success against a variety of insects in a number of different agro-ecosystems with no significant ecological implications (Lipa 1985; Kimtova & Bajan 1982; Hajek et al. 1987; Weiser 1987; Groden & Lockwood 1991). More recently, Rossini et al. (2014) observed high compatibility of B. bassiana and the parasitoid Cotesia flavipes Cameron (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) when applied against Reticulitermes spp. (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae), Metamasius hemipterus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), and Sphenophorus levis Vaurie (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Similarly, several studies have shown under laboratory conditions that application of commercial concentrations of B. bassiana is compatible with beneficial insects. Thungrabeab and Tongma (2007) indicated that B. bassinna was found to be non-pathogenic to several natural enemies including Coccinella septempunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), Chrysoperla carnea Stephens (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), and Dicyphus tamaninii Wagner (Hemiptera: Miridae), and the beneficial soildwelling insect Heteromurus nitidus (Templeton) (Collembola: Entomobryidae). Al mazra'awi (2007) exposed honey bee, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), hives to high inoculum densities of B. bassiana, which resulted in very low mortality that was not different from the untreated control regardless of the isolate tested. Two of the strains tested were isolated from Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois) (Hemiptera: Miridae) collected in Arkansas and New York. Todovora et al. (1996) fed Coleomegilla maculata lengi Timberlake (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) with B. bassiana infected Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and B. bassiana contaminated pollen and found no mortality of C. maculata. Leyva et al. (2011) found that larvae and pupae of Chrysoperla exotera (Navás) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) submerged in high concentration suspensions of B. bassiana were not affected at any developmental stages of this predator.

Mycopesticides are often based on an indigenous rather than exotic fungal pathogens (Butt et al. 2001; Inglis et al. 2001). The native strain NI8 of B. bassiana (ARSEF8889) was originally isolated from insects in the Mississippi Delta and its frequency of natural infection on L. lineolaris is higher in areas undisturbed by agriculture practices, which are also areas often preferred by arthropod predators (Leland & Snodgrass 2005; Portilla et al. 2016). Investigations are underway to measure the impact of the native strain NI8 on L. lineolaris populations in wild hosts and crops in the Mississippi Delta. Portilla (2014) found under laboratory conditions that the Mississippi Delta native strain NI8 B. bassiana isolated from L. lineolaris can kill predators such as minute pirate bug, Orius insidiosus (Say) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), Asian lady beetle, Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), jumping spiders (Aranea: Salticidae), and crab spiders (Aranea: Thomosidae), but that LC50 values were greater than 3- to 90-fold those needed to kill the tarnished plant bug, L. lineolaris. Knowledge of the impact of B. bassiana on target and non-target insects is critical for potential registration and expanded use of this fungus as a microbial control agent, especially as the targeted host may be located in ditches and field borders early in the growing season (Abel et al. 2007).

The green lacewing, Chrysoperla rufilabris (Burmeister) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) is a polyphagous predator that has potential as a biological control agent against several species of pests including Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) (Breene et al. 1992), Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae) (Nordlund & Morrison, 1990), L. decemlineata (Nordlund & Morrison, 1992), Heliothis virescens F. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) (Nordlund & Morrison 1990), and Helicoverpa zea Boddie (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) (Lingren et al. 1968). Adult lacewings are often found in high numbers in corn and cotton fields (Sheldon & Macleod 1971, 1974). However, to the best of our knowledge, no research has examined the effect of B. bassiana on adults of this predator. The purpose of this study was to measure the impact of atomized sprays of the entomophatogenic fungus B. bassiana strain NI8 on C. rufilabris by quantification of the lethal effects and sub-lethal impacts on reproductive rates by estimating LC50 (lethal concentration), SR50 (sporulation response), and ratio-response impacts. Chrysoperla rufilabris is one of the most common lacewings species preying on nymphs of L. lineolaris and many other insects in the Mississippi Delta. Sprays of B. bassiana targeted at L. lineolaris would likely expose this and other predators to the entomopathogenic fungus.

Materials and Methods

COLONIES OF CHRYSOPERLA RUFILABRIS

Chrysoperla rufilabris adults used in this study were obtained from a commercial supplier (Biocontrol Net Work, Brentwood, Tennessee). About 400 adults (2–3 d old) were received overnight. To ensure copulation, insects were maintained collectively in the original container obtained from the commercial supplier (3 L cylindrical cardboard carton covered with organdy cotton cloth). A sponge with sugar-water solution (10%) was placed in an 11 cm diameter Petri dish inside the cage. Insects were held in a growth chamber at 25 °C, 55% relative humidity (RH), and a photoperiod of 12:12 h L:D until first oviposition was observed.

CULTURE OF BEAUVERIA BASSIANA STRAIN NI8

The NI8 strain of B. bassiana was obtained from stored sources of spore powder maintained at the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Southern Insect Research Unit (SIMRU). NI8 is produced at SIMRU regularly for the L. lineolaris research program (Portilla et al. 2016). The inoculum concentration (1.20 × 1011 spores per g) was suspended in 50 mL of 0.04% Tween-80 (Sigma-Aldrich P8074, St. Louis, Missouri) and diluted to obtain final concentrations of 7 × 107 spores per mL. The inoculum viability was measured according to the methodology of Portilla et al. (2014a, 2016). Lower test concentrations (7 × 104, 105, and 106) for this study were extrapolated based on dilution of the highest concentration (7 × 107). Resulting data were analyzed by analysis of variance (SAS 2013). Aliquots (6 mL) of the highest concentration suspension (7 × 107) provided 395 viable spores per mm2 on the targeted sprayed area when applied using a Potter Precision Laboratory Spray Tower (Burkard Scientific, Uxbridge, UK) following the procedures of Portilla et al. (2014a).

BIOASSAY PROCEDURE

Serial dilutions of 4 test concentrations of NI8 strain (1.2 × 104, 105, 106, and 107 spores per mL) were prepared to treat C. rufilabris females and evaluate the effect of the NI8 strain on their reproductive rates. To avoid cross infection, only 4- to 5-d-old adult females received from the commercial supplier were used. Selected females were sprayed with NI8 using the direct inoculation method (atomized spray delivery) described by Portilla et al. (2014a, 2016). Treated insects were held in a growth chamber at 25 °C, 55% RH, and a photoperiod of 12:12 h L:D. Each assay treatment (individual concentration) was replicated 4 times with 10 adult females per replicate (200 females total). Control insects were sprayed similarly (12.5 kPa per inch2) with 6 mL of water (water control). Treatments of NI8 concentrations (1.20 × 104, 105, 106, and 107 spores per mL) were similarly delivered in a 6 mL spray volume of B. bassiana solution. After application, C. rufilabris females were placed individually into a 29.7 mL cups with a solid diet developed for L. lineolaris bioassays (Portilla et al. 2014a). No additional food source was provided. Females were examined daily for mortality and oviposition. The numbers of eggs oviposited every day by each female were counted. Females with eggs were removed and placed in a new diet cup until the last female died. Dead insects were retained in individual diet cups for 10 d and were observed daily for sporulation.

REPRODUCTIVE RATES OF C. RUFILABRIS

Fertility life tables were calculated according to Portilla et al. (2014b). Life fertility tables were determined by selecting age class (x) and the number of females surviving to age x (Nx). Using these parameters the following model was determined: lx = Nx /No (where lx = the proportion of females surviving to age x, and where No = the number of initial females) (Carey 1993). The daily calculation of age-specific survival rate (lx) and age specific fecundity (mx) was used to estimate net reproductive rate (fi01_627.gif), doubling time (DT = 1n(2)/rm), mean generation time (fi02_627.gif), intrinsic rate of increase (fi03_627.gif) and finite rate of increase (λ = e-rm) (Carey 1993; Krebs 2001). Calculations were done by assuming a 1:1 sex ratio, an immature survival of 0.7 (due to their cannibalistic nature) and a developmental time (egg to adults) of 25 d based on quality assessment data obtained from C. rufilabris producers in California (Silvers et al. 2002) and published work by Nordlund & Morrison (1990, 1992), Legaspi et al. (1994), and Giles et al. (2000). By using the fertility tables, reproductive values were calculated, which is defined as the contribution in population numbers that 1 newly hatched individual will make over the remaining life of the female where y and x are age and w is the age of the last successful reproduction (Krebs 2001).

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

One-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey Honest Significant Difference test was used to compare fertility table parameters on C. rufilabris sprayed with different B. bassiana concentrations. Non-parametric estimates of the survival function of C. rufilabris females were compared between treatments by using PROC LIFETEST procedure in SAS (SAS 2013). Statistical differences in the survival of C. rufilabris females were declared based on the log-rank statistic and by using the PROC GLM procedure to detect differences between concentrations at 3, 5, and 10 d after application. Mortality and sporulation data for each group of C. rufilabris females and each concentration were analyzed by PROBIT (SAS 2013) using common logarithm (log to the base 10) of the concentration value.

Results

TIME-MORTALITY RESPONSE OF C. RUFILABRIS TO B. BASSIANA STRAIN NI8

The survivorship of C. rufilabris females treated at different concentrations of B. bassiana strain NI8 is shown in Fig. 1A. Survival was measured through daily post-treatment observations until all females died. Survival rates of treated females varied among the 4 B. bassiana concentrations, where those at higher concentrations died faster than those at lower concentrations. The earliest mortality recorded was observed at the highest concentration (7 × 107) followed by 7 × 106 at 2 and 3 d after treatment, respectively. Mortality at lower concentrations (7 × 104 and 7 × 105) was recorded 4 and 5 d after treatment, yet the first mortality in the water control was not recorded until 9 d after application. Mortality analyzed by the test of equality with the strata statement in -log (survival probability) PROC LIFETEST indicated significant differences among concentrations (Log-Rank X2 = 23.99, df = 4, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1.

Fertility table data and reproductive values of Chrysoperla rufilabris females exposed to Beauveria bassiana strain NI8 at different concentrations (spores per mm2) under laboratory conditions. Insects were fed with a Lygus species solid diet after being sprayed with fungus. A. Survival probability at age x (lx) (p = 0.05, LIFETEST of Equality over Strata); B. Net fecundity (lxmx); and C. Reproductive value (Vx).

f01_627.jpg

MORTALITY-RESPONSE AND SPORULATION RESPONSE OF CHRYSOPERLA RUFILABRIS TO B. BASSIANA STRAIN NI8

The B. bassiana strain NI8 was pathogenic to C. rufilabris females. However, the levels of mortality and resulting sporulation in cadavers were highly variable between concentrations (Fig. 2). Mortality 3 d after spray at the lowest concentration (7 × 104) was 2.5-fold lower than that observed at the highest concentration (7 × 107), but no significant differences were found among those insects exposed to water alone (F = 1.47, df = 4, 199; p = 0.2135). Mortality at 5 d (F = 4.73, df = 4, 199; p = 0.0012), and 10 d (F = 1.47, df = 4, 199; p < 0.0001) after spray was significantly different among treatments. The percentage of individuals resulting in sporulating cadavers at 10 d was significantly affected by spore concentration (F = 43.34, df = 4, 199; p <0.0001). Sporulation increased with concentration tested (Table 1). Time of sporulation after death was significantly different among treatments (F = 57.87, df = 4, 115; p <0.0001). Sporulation took longer at lower concentrations. Analyses of concentration—mortality and sporulation responses are shown in Table 2. Chrysoperla rufilabris females were highly affected at low concentrations of B. bassiana (LC50 = 2.11 viable spores per mm2); higher concentration were needed for sporulation (SR50 = 3.60 viable spores per mm2).

Fig. 2.

Cumulative mortality of Chrysoperla rufilabris females at 3, 5, and 10 d exposed to Beauveria bassiana strain NI8 at different concentrations (spores per mm2) under laboratory conditions. Insects were fed with a Lygus species solid diet after being sprayed with fungus. Columns within the group labeled with a different letter were significant different at P = 0.05 (Tukey Honest Significant Difference test).

f02_627.jpg

EFFECTS OF B. BASSIANA NI8 STRAIN ON THE FERTILITY TABLE PARAMETERS OF C. RUFILABRIS

All demographic measurements for C. rufilabris females obtained from the water controls were significantly higher than those for insects treated with different concentrations of B. bassiana except for doubling time (DT) (F = 2.13, df = 4, 19; p = 0.1402) which, did not differ among treatments. However, high variation among treatment values of DT were observed (Table 3). Water control females doubled their populations in 6.28 ± 0.39 (SE) d and females sprayed with the highest concentration of B. bassiana doubled their population in 20.11 ± 17.21 (SE) d. Total egg production varied among the 4 test concentrations (F = 18.13, df = 4, 19; p <0.0001). Egg production from females exposed to water control (822.25 ± 141.70 [SE] eggs per 10 females) was 1.68-fold (488.5 ± 156.74 [SE]) and 7.18-fold (114.5 ± 70.35 [SE]) greater than those obtained from females exposed to the lowest and highest concentrations of B. bassiana, respectively. The highest intrinsic rate of increase (rm) was found in females sprayed with water alone (0.111 ± 0.003 [SE]) and rm values varied significantly among treatments (F = 10.41, df = 4, 19; p = 0.0007). Daily rate of increase of 1.12 females per female per d, a doubling time of 6.28 ± 0.39 (SE), a gross fecundity (Ro) of 127.15 ± 44.39 (SE) for female and male eggs per female, and a mean generation time (T) of 31.89 ± 1.81 (SE) d were observed for females exposed to water alone. The mean generation time of females from the water control was significantly higher than all other treatments (F = 3.41, df = 4, 19; p = 0.0289) with a prolonged mean age of reproduction of about 1 and 4 d longer than that of females sprayed with lowest and highest concentrations of B. bassiana, respectively. Females sprayed with the lowest concentration had a gross fecundity (Ro) of 66.47 ± 31.19 (SE) eggs per female; those sprayed with the highest concentration had a gross fecundity of 17.51 ± 9.39 (SE) eggs per female. Significantly shorter longevity also was found (F = 21.90, df = 4,199; p <0.0001) in treated insects. Females sprayed with the highest concentration lived 6 d shorter than those females sprayed with the lowest concentration and 13 d shorter than females sprayed with water alone (Table 3). Figure 1A, B, and C showed that trends of survival (lx), fecundity function (lxmx), and reproductive values (Vx) were inversely related to spore concentrations. Higher concentrations resulted in lower survival and reproduction.

Table 1.

Mean (± SD) percentage sporulation in Chrysoperla rufilabris sprayed with 4 concentrations of Beauveria bassiana strain NI8 and fed with a solid Lygus species diet.

t01_627.gif

Discussion

The significant differences in -log survival probability among concentrations indicated that C. rufilabris females obtained lethal concentrations of conidia directly from the B. bassiana spray (Fig. 1A). Low mortality and survival noted for insects in the water controls suggests that the Lygus species diet (Portilla et al. 2014a) may be an acceptable diet for rearing C. rufilabris females. Preliminary assays (data not shown) indicated that this predator survived better on the Lygus diet than when females were fed individually with a nutrient-rich slurry consisting of brewer's yeast, sugar, and water (1:1:1) (Cohen & Smith 1998). Cohen (1993, 1995) explained the extra-oral digestive nature of feeding by Neuropteran predators; predators such as C. rufilabris thrive on solid lipid- and protein-rich diets. Portilla et al. (2016) similarly demonstrated that the Lygus diet facilitated a comparison of pathogenesis and sporogenesis phases of 3 B. bassiana strains tested against Megacopta cribraria F. (Heteroptera: Plataspidae).

Mortality and sporulation are the main evaluation factors used to determine levels of B. bassiana pathogenicity (Portilla et al. 2016). Results presented in this investigation indicated that under laboratory conditions C. rufilabris adult females are highly susceptible to B. bassiana infection by direct exposure. Infectivity and sporulation of entomopathogenic fungi has been shown to increase under high humidity in field, laboratory, and green house conditions (Barson 1976). However, the number of conidia acquired by the host is probably the key factor that increases propagation of conidia by sporogenesis. Mortality and sporulation levels gradually increased when concentrations of conidia increased, even when the humidity condition that occurred in the closed diet cup (> 80% RH) was consistent for all treatments (Table 1; Fig. 2). The LC50 reported in this study (Table 2) showed that C. rufilabris mortality could be affected at very low concentrations of B. bassiana strain NI8 (2.11 viable spores per mm2), which is comparable to that found for L. lineolaris using the same strain (2.75 viable spores per mm2) (Portilla 2014). Both C. rufilabris and L. lineolaris need higher concentrations of conidia for sporulation (SR50), but those needed for sporulation in C. rufilabris (13.60 spores per mm2) were 5.4-fold greater than those needed for L. lineolaris (5.81 spores per mm2) (Portilla 2014). Other chrysopids (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) including Chrysoperla externa Hagen (Pessoa et al. 2005), C. carnea (Thungrabeab & Tongma, 2007), and Chrysoperla exterior (Navás) (Leyva et al. 2011) also have shown to have concentration-dependent responses to entomopathogenic fungi. Pessoa et al. (2005) observed that C. externa third instar larvae were affected by suspensions of 1.0 × 107 conidia mL of B. bassiana; but, there was no fungal effects on egg viability or developmental time of first and second instar larvae. Leyva et al. (2011) obtained similar results when C. exterior was exposed to different concentrations of B. bassiana. No significant effects were measured with 1 × 106 and 1 × 107 on any immature stages, but adults showed 10% mortality 4 d after application with concentrations of B. bassiana.

Table 2.

Mortality-response (LC50) and sporulation-response (SR50) of adult female of Chrysoperla rufilabris treated with Beauveria bassiana strain NI8 applied at 4 concentrations (± 95% CI [confidence interval]).

t02_627.gif

Table 3.

Life table statistic for Chrysoperla rufilabris sprayed with Beauveria bassiana strain NI8 at different concentrations and fed with a Lygus species solid diet.

t03_627.gif

Measurements of fundamental reproductive components are essential for understanding the population dynamics of C. rufilabris when exposed to B. bassiana. Based on the present results, applications of B. bassiana to C. rufilabris adult females will decrease survival and reproduction. Exposure to higher concentrations will exhibit greater effects (Fig. 1A, B, C; Table 3). According to Donegan (1989) temperature, starvation, and nutrition stresses significantly affect susceptibility of C. carnea to B. bassiana, but nutrition is the most important. With the present study, it should be noted that the use of Lygus diet in this research could impact some aspects of C. rufilabris female biology and behavior such as longevity and estimates of production. However, results in this study were comparable to those on the quality assessment of C. rufilabris producers in California (Silvers et al. 2002), where a female fed with artificial diet deposited more than 200 eggs in her 4 to 6 wk lifespan under laboratory conditions, which is similar to the gross fecundity of 127.15 eggs per female obtained in an approximate 4 wk period (25.17 ± 8.95 SE d) for the water control. It should also be noted that the egg production in the present study was obtained from females that were exposed to males only from emergence to the mating period (2 d after received from commercial supplier). This could explain the shorter longevity obtained in infected females.

In general, the reproductive estimates shown here assumed a hypothetical cohort subjected throughout its lifetime from egg to adult females mortality that could be measured for an actual population of C. rufilabris exposed to the entomopathogenic fungus B. bassiana. The speed at which a population increased (rm) is the most important parameter (Carey 1993; Krebs 2001) and C. rufilabris individuals in the water control obtained the highest intrinsic rate value (0.111). The rm calculation of C. rufilabris agrees closely with Jokar & Zarabi (2012) when C. carnea was reared under laboratory conditions (rm values of 0.074, 0.162, and 0.185) and fed with different media. Amarasekare & Shearer (2013) reported similar rm values calculated for C. carnea and Chrysoperla johnsoni Henry (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) of 0.161 and 0.132, respectively.

This laboratory experiment provides information needed to understand the effect of B. bassiana on C. rufilabris. Strain NI8 affects this predator by direct mortality effects and indirect reproductive impacts. The rm values reported in this study may vary under field conditions, where chrysopids directly interact with pests and the environment. Further studies are under way that will examine the pathogenicity of B. bassiana strain NI8 to predator and other nontargets arthropods under field conditions. Decisions to deploy NI8 as a biological control for L. lineolaris in different host environments should be based on an overall assessment of ecological and economic benefits and costs.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Tabatha Nelson and Maria Benavides, USDA-ARS-SIMRU for their valuable support. We are also grateful to Clint Allen and Bryce Blackman for their comments on an early version of this manuscript.

References Cited

1.

Abel CA, Snodgrass GL, Gore J. 2007. A cultural method for the area-wide control of tarnished plant bugs in cotton, pp. 497–504 In Vreyse MJB, Robinson AS, Hendricks J. [eds.], Area-wide Control of Insect Pests: From Research to Field Implementation. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Google Scholar

2.

Al mazra'awi MS. 2007. Impact of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana on the honey bee, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of Agricultural Science 3: 7–11. Google Scholar

3.

Amarasekare KG, Shearer PW. 2013. Life history comparison of two green lacewing species Chysoperla johnsoni and Chysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environmental Entomology. 42: 1979–1084. Google Scholar

4.

Barson G. 1976. Laboratory studies on the fungus Verticillium lecanii, a larval pathogen of the elm bark beetle. Annals of Applied Biology 83: 207–214. Google Scholar

5.

Breene RG, Meagher RL, Nordlund DA, Wang Y. 1992. Biological control on Bermisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in a greenhouse using Chrysoperla rufilabris (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Biological Control 2: 9–14. Google Scholar

6.

Butt TM, Jackson C, Magan N. 2001. Introduction-fungal biological control agents: progress, problems and potentials, pp. 1–7 In Butt TM, Jackson C, Magan N. [eds.]. Fungi as Biocontrol Agents Progress, Problems and Potential. CABI Publishing, Oxford, UK. Google Scholar

7.

Carey FG. 1993. Applied Demography for Biologists: with Special Emphasis on Insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. Google Scholar

8.

Cohen AC. 1993. Organization of digestion and preliminary characterization of salivary trypsin-like enzymes in a predaceous heteropteran, Zeus renardii. Journal of Insect Physiology 39: 823–829. Google Scholar

9.

Cohen AC 1995. Extra-oral digestion in predaceous terrestrial Arthropoda. Annual Review of Entomology 40: 85–103. Google Scholar

10.

Cohen AC, Smith LK. 1998. A new concept in artificial diets for Chrysoperla rufilabris: the efficacy of solid diets. Biological Control 13: 49–54. Google Scholar

11.

Destefano RHR, Destefano SAL, Messias CL 2004. Detection of Metarhizium anisopliae var. anisopliae within infected sugarcane borer Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae) using specific primers. Genetics and Molecular Biology 27: 245–252. Google Scholar

12.

Donegan K. 1989. Effect of several stress factors on the susceptibility of the predatory insect, Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), to the fungal pathogen Beauveria bassiana. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 54: 79–84. Google Scholar

13.

Fuentes-Contreras E, Niemeyer HM. 2000. Effect of wheat resistance, the parasitoid Aphidius rhopalosiphi, and the entomopathogenic fungus Pandora neophidis, on population dynamics of the cereal aphid Sitobion avenae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 97: 109–114. Google Scholar

14.

Giles KL, Madden, RD, Payton ME, Dillwith JW. 2000. Survival and development of Chrysoperla rufilabris (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) supplied with pea aphids (Homoptera: Aphidae) reared on alfalfa and faba bean. Environmental Entomology 29: 304–311. Google Scholar

15.

Groden E, Lockwood JL. 1991. Effects of soil fungistasis on Beauveria bassiana and its relationship to disease incidence in the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, in Michigan and Rhode Island soils. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 57: 7–16. Google Scholar

16.

Hajek AE, Soper RS, Roberts, DW, Anderson TE, Biever KD, Ferro DN, Lebrun RA, Storch RH. 1987. Foliar application of Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. for control of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae); an overview of pilot test results from the Northern United States. The Canadian Entomologist 119: 959–974. Google Scholar

17.

Inglis GD, Goettel M, Butt TM, Strasser H. 2001. Use of hyphomycetous fungi for managing insect pests, pp. 23–69 In Butt TM, Jackson C, Magan N. [eds], Fungi as Biocontrol Agents Progress, Problems and Potential. CABI Publishing, Oxford, UK. Google Scholar

18.

Jaronski ST. 2014. Mass production of entomopathogenic fungi: state of the art, pp. 357–413 In Morales-Ramos J. [ed.], Mass Production of Beneficial Organisms. Academic Press, New York, New York. Google Scholar

19.

Jokar M, Zarabi M. 2012. Prominence of three diets on life table parameters for Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) to mass rearing under laboratory condition. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 45: 2213–2222. Google Scholar

20.

Kimtova K, Bajan C. 1982. Pathogenicity level of various strain of Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. Polish Ecological Studies 8: 409–417. Google Scholar

21.

Krebs CJ. 2001. Ecology: the Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance, 5th edition. Wesley Longman, San Francisco, California. Google Scholar

22.

Legaspi JC, Carruthers RI, Nordlund DA. 1994. Life history of Chrysoperla rufilabris (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) provided sweetpotato whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodiade) and other food. Biological Control 4: 178–184. Google Scholar

23.

Leland JE, Snodgrass GL. 2005. Prevalence of naturally occurring Beauveria bassiana in Lygus lineolaris (Heteroptera: Miridae) population from wild host plants of Mississippi. Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology 21: 157–163. Google Scholar

24.

Leyva OE, Villalon EM, Avila RA, Bulet DB. 2011. Susceptibilidad de Chrysopa exterior Navas a Beauveria bassiana (Blasamo) Vuillemin cepa LBB-1 en condiciones de laboratorio. Fitosanidad 15: 51–57. Google Scholar

25.

Lingren PD, Ridgay RL, Jones SL. 1968. Consumption by several common arthropods predators of eggs and larvae of two Heliothis species that attack cotton. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 61: 613–618. Google Scholar

26.

Lipa JJ. 1985. Progress in biological control of the Colorado beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) in Eastern Europe. Bulletin of the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization 15: 207–211. Google Scholar

27.

Mahdavi V, Saber M, Rafiee-Dastjerdi H, Mehrvar A. 2013. Susceptibility of the hymenopteran parasitoid, Habrobracon hebetor (Say) (Braconidae) to the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana Vuillemin and Metarhizium anisopliae Sorokin. Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences 6: 17–20. Google Scholar

28.

Meyling NV, Thorup-Kristensen K, Eilenberg J. 2011. Below and above ground abundance and distribution of fungal entomopathogen in experimental conventional and organic cropping system. Biological Control 59: 180–186. Google Scholar

29.

Nordlund DA, Morrison RK. 1990. Handling time, prey preference, and functional response for Chrysoperla rufilabris in the laboratory. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 57: 237–242. Google Scholar

30.

Nordlund DA, Morrison RK. 1992. Mass rearing of Chrysoperla spp., pp. 427–439 In Anderson TE, Leppla NC [eds.], Advances in Insect Rearing for Research and Pest Management. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado. Google Scholar

31.

Pessoa LGA, Cavalcanti RS, Moino-Junior A, Souza B. 2005. Compatibilidade entre Beuveria bassiana e o predador Chysoperla externa em laboratorio. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 40: 617–619. Google Scholar

32.

Portilla M. 2014. Biological control as an alternative measure for TPB in Mississippi. Midsouth Entomologist 7: 38–46. Google Scholar

33.

Portilla M, Snodgrass G, Luttrell R. 2014a. A novel bioassay to evaluate the potential of Beauveria bassiana strain NI8 and the insect growth regulator novaluron against Lygus lineolaris on a non-autoclaved solid artificial diet. Journal of Insect Science 14: 1–13. Google Scholar

34.

Portilla M, Ramos-Morales J, Rojas G, Blanco, C. 2014b. Life tables as tools of evaluation and quality control for arthropods mass production, pp. 241–275 In Morales-Ramos J [ed.], Mass Production of Beneficial Organisms. Academic Press, New York, New York. Google Scholar

35.

Portilla M, Walker J, Perera O, Seiter N, Greene J. 2016. Estimation of median lethal concentration of three isolates of Beuaveria bassiana for control of Megacopta cribaria (Heteroptera: Plataspidae) bioassayed on solid Lygus spp. diet. Insects 7: 1–13. Google Scholar

36.

Rossoni C, Kassab SO, Loureiro ES, Pereira FF, Costa DP, Barbosa RH, Zanuncio JC. 2014. Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) are compatible with Cotesia flavipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Florida Entomologist 97: 1794–1804. Google Scholar

37.

Roy HE, Cotrell E. 2008. Forgotten natural enemies: Interaction between coccinellids and insect-parasitic fungi. European Journal of Entomology 105: 391–398. Google Scholar

38.

SAS (SAS Institute Inc.). 2013. SAS/STAT® 9.4 User's Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina. Google Scholar

39.

Sheldon JK Macleod EG. 1971. Studies on the biology of the Chrysopidae II: the feeding behavior of the adult of Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera). Psyche 78: 107–121. Google Scholar

40.

Sheldon JK, Macleod EG. 1974. Studies on the biology of the Chrysopidae IV: a field and laboratory study of the seasonal cycle of Chrysoperla carnea Stephens in Central Illinois (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Transactions of the American Entomological Society 100: 437–512. Google Scholar

41.

Silvers CS, Morse JG, Grafton-Cardwell EE. 2002. Quality assessment of Chrysoperla rufiliabris (Nueroptera: Chrysopidae) producers in California. Florida Entomologist 85: 594–598. Google Scholar

42.

Thungrabeab M, Tongma S. 2007. Effect of entomopathogenic fungi, Beauveria bassiana (Balsam) and Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch) on non target insects. KMITL Science and Technology Journal 7: 8–12. Google Scholar

43.

Todovora SI, Cote JC, Coderre D. 1996. Evaluation of the effects of two Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin strains on the development of Coleomegilla maculata lengi Timberlake (Col., Coccinellidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 120: 159–163. Google Scholar

44.

Weiser Y. 1987. Application of boverol for Colorado beetle and other pests control. Informative Bulletin. EPS International Organization for Biological Control, pp. 58–60. Google Scholar
Maribel Portilla, Gordon Snodgrass, and Randall Luttrell "Lethal and Sub-Lethal Effects of Beauveria bassiana (Cordycipitaceae) Strain NI8 on Chrysoperla rufilabris (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)," Florida Entomologist 100(3), 627-633, (1 September 2017). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.100.0321
Published: 1 September 2017
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
crisopa
demographic parameter
dieta solida
entomopathogenic fungus
esperanza de vida
hongos entomopatogenos
lacewing
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top