Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 March 2018 Tyrosine Hydroxylase, a Potential Target for the RNAi-Mediated Management of Diamondback Moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae)
R. Ellango, R. Asokan, G. Sharath Chandra, N. K. Krishna Kumar, Riaz Mahmood, V. V. Ramamurthy
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Cruciferous vegetables are severely damaged by infestation of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Successful utilization of RNA interference (RNAi) in insect pest management programs depends on various factors, such as target gene, mode of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) delivery, frequency of application, and development stage of the target insect. Among these factors, selection of the target gene is crucial to the success of RNAi-based programs. In the present investigation, an attempt was made to assess the potential of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) as a target gene, which is a key regulator in the biosynthesis of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA). DOPA is a precursor for agents that function in neurotransmission, melanization, sclerotization of the cuticle, and immune responses in insects. Here, we provided to diamondback moth larvae 3 concentrations (1.04, 2.08, and 3.12 μg/cm2) of cognate dsRNA coated on discs of cabbage leaf, the natural diet for the larvae. We recorded the influence of the dietary dsRNA on TH transcript levels, larval growth, and larval survival rate. The dietary dsRNA led to reduced target gene transcript level and larval feeding level, and caused larval mortality in a concentration-dependent manner. These results demonstrate that the TH gene has potential as a target gene for RNAi-mediated management of P. xylostella.

Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) is a highly migratory cosmopolitan pest of cruciferous vegetables and several ornamentals. Management of P. xylostella is daunting due to its nature and development of resistance to insecticides and to transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis toxins (Sayyed et al. 2005; Grzywacz et al. 2010; Zalucki et al. 2012). There is a need to find effective, alternative approaches for managing this pest (Ellango et al. 2014b)

RNA interference (RNAi) is an endogenous natural defense mechanism against invading viruses and pathogens. RNAi is achieved by delivery of long double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) or small-interfering RNA (siRNA) that mediates sequence-specific degradation of target mRNA (Mao & Zeng 2012). This tool has shown potential to combat insect pests and to characterize newly identified genes (Baum et al. 2007; Mao et al. 2011; Zha et al. 2011; Firmino et al. 2013; Ramaseshadri et al. 2013; Xiong et al. 2013). However, the efficacy of RNAi varies among species and target genes (Terenius et al. 2011; Asokan et al. 2014). Therefore, identification of a potential target gene for RNAi is important in order to control P. xylostella.

The biochemical 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) acts in several aspects of insect biology including circadian rhythms, neurotransmission, tanning of cuticle, immunity, sclerotization, melanization, and wound repair in insects (Birman et al. 1994; Gorman et al. 2007). DOPA biosynthesis is regulated by a key rate-limiting enzyme, tyrosine hydroxylase (TH). Therefore, we envisioned that silencing the gene encoding TH might impact individual P. xylostella larvae and result in reduced populations.

Achievement of RNAi through diet-mediated delivery (Turner et al. 2006) of dsRNA is promising, compared with delivery of dsRNA through a spray or transgenic plants. Here, we provided to P. xylostella larvae dsRNA coated on cabbage leaf discs as the larval natural diet.

Materials and Methods

INSECT CULTURE

Larvae of P. xylostella were collected from cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.; Brassicaceae) grown at Indian Institute of Horticulture Research, Bangalore, India. They were maintained on cabbage leaves at 28 ± 1 °C and a 14:10 h L:D photoperiod in the laboratory. Eclosed moths were transferred to rearing cages (40 × 30 × 40 cm), where adults were provided 5% honey in water on cotton wads.

DOUBLE-STRANDED RNA (Dsrna ) SYNTHESIS

The previously cloned TH gene of P. xylostella (Ellango et al. 2014a) was used for dsRNA synthesis. Off-target minimized region for the synthesis of dsRNA was selected using the online software “dsCheck” (Naito et al. 2005). The selected dsRNA region was analyzed for short perfect nucleotide matches with non-target organisms like pollinators, predators, and humans with NCBI-BLAST. The T7 promoter sequence was added at the 5′ end of specific primers and used for synthesis of dsRNA template (Table 1). For non-target control, dsRNA derived from approximately 500 bp of dehydration responsive element binding protein 1A (DREB1A) of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. (Brassicaceae) was used. DREB1A-derived dsRNA had been used as a non-target control for RNAi experiments in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) (Asokan et al. 2013).

Table 1.

List of primers used in this study.

t01_01.gif

The template for dsRNA synthesis was obtained by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) performed in a reaction volume of 50 μL comprising 36.5 μL PCR-grade water, 5 μL 10X Taq buffer, 1.0 μL (10 mM) dNTP mix, 1.0 μL (10 mM) each of forward and reverse primers (Table 1), 2.5 μL 1:50 diluted plasmid clone as template, and 1.0 μL Taq polymerase (3 U/μL) (Fermentas Life Sciences, USA). Amplification was performed with the following parameters: 94 °C for 3 min followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 64 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 45 s and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR product was resolved in ethidium bromide pre-stained 1.2% agarose gel, and the desired band was excised and eluted with Nucleospin Extract II kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany). We synthesized dsRNA by in vitro transcription of 2 μg of eluted PCR product with MEGAscript® kit (Ambion Life Technologies, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Concentration and integrity of the dsRNA were assessed by NanoDrop™ 2000 (Thermo Scientific, USA) and agarose gel electrophoresis, respectively.

INSECT BIOASSAY WITH dsRNA

Fresh cabbage leaf discs (diameter 19.16 cm2) were placed in a Petri dish containing 1% agar. Stock dsRNA was diluted with 0.1% diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water to yield concentrations of 20, 40, and 60 μg/40 μL. The final concentration of dsRNA on each leaf disc was approximately 1.04, 2.08, and 3.12 μg/cm2 in 20, 40, and 60 μg treatments, respectively. These 3 dilutions were applied individually on the surface of the leaf disc with a clean soft paint brush and allowed to dry. We used the highest concentration, 3.12 μg/cm2 (60 μg), of DREB1A dsRNA for non-target control. Five-day-old P. xylostella larvae were transferred to each leaf disc and maintained until the end of the experiment. There were 4 replicates, and each replicate contained 5 larvae (20 total) for each concentration of cognate dsRNA treatment and for non-target and negative (water) controls. Observations on the larval mortality rates were recorded on subsequent days up to 5 d (larval mortality was confirmed by prodding). Leaf area eaten by larvae was calculated with LI-3100C Area Meter (LI-COR Biosciences, USA) by following the manufacturer's protocol.

ASSESSMENT OF GENE SILENCING

Total RNA was extracted from single larvae of P. xylostella on the 3rd day of dsRNA treatment by using the Isolate II RNA mini kit (Bioline Reagents Ltd., United Kingdom), according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA integrity was analyzed by agarose gel (1.2%) electrophoresis, and concentration was determined with NanoDrop™ 2000. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized by reverse transcribing 2 μg total RNA in the Tetro cDNA Synthesis kit (Bioline Reagents Ltd., United Kingdom) by following the manufacturer's protocol.

Scientific Notes

The extent of gene silencing was assessed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) (Light Cycler 480II-Roche Diagnostics Pvt. Ltd. Switzerland). The qPCR assays were designed according to the Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative PCR Experiments (MIQE) guidelines (Bustin et al. 2009). In the present study, β-actin was used as a reference gene for normalization of qPCR data (Teng et al. 2012; Mao & Zeng 2012). Initially, we assessed the expression stability of 5 reference genes under dsRNA-treated conditions (unpublished data) and results were similar to those of Teng et al. (2012), who found that β-actin was a suitable reference gene for P. xylostella gene expression studies. PCR amplification efficiency of reference and target genes were assessed in 4 dilutions, approximately 25, 2.5, 0.25, and 0.025 ng cDNA of control and of 20 and 60 μg TH dsRNA—treated samples. The qPCR mix comprised 10 μL SYBR® Green JumpStart™ Taq Ready-Mix™ (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 0.5 μL each of forward and reverse primers (Table 1), and 3 μL (1:5) diluted cDNA template, and the final volume was brought to 20 μL with molecular biology—grade water. All qPCR assays were performed in triplicates for each sample. Amplification was performed by using the following parameters: 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. Amplification specificity was analyzed by generating melting curves. The relative expression of TH was calculated with the 2−ΔΔCT method (Livak & Schmittgen 2001).

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

The extent of target gene silencing was statistically analyzed by ttests with Cq (quantification cycle) values of 3 independent biological replicates. Larval mortality data were analyzed by ANOVA at P = 0.05. Leaf area eaten was statistically analyzed by paired t-tests. Pearson's correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between the concentration of dsRNA and percentage of silencing. Analyses were performed with GraphPadPrism v.5 (GraphPad Software, Inc., USA).

Results

EFFECT OF dsRNA ON TARGET GENE TRANSCRIPT LEVELS

The PCR amplification efficiency ranged from 95 to 97% for β-actin and TH indicating that the amplification efficiencies for the reference and target genes were similar (Table 2). We quantified the relative expression of TH on the 3rd day of dsRNA treatment. The highest silencing (83%) was observed in the 3.12 μg/cm2 treatment followed by 55 and 13% in the 2.08 and 1.04 μg/cm2 treatments, respectively (Fig. 1). A strong linear relationship (R2 = 0.9921) between the dsRNA concentration and silencing was observed. Application of the non-target DREB1A dsRNA did not alter the expression of TH compared with the water control (Fig. 1).

EFFECT OF dsRNA ON LARVAL SURVIVAL RATE

We observed larval mortality onset on the 3rd day after treatment. The observed mortality was significantly higher compared with controls (water control and non-target DREB1A dsRNA). Larval mortality rates increased with increasing concentration of dsRNA. The highest mortality (90%) was recorded in the 3.12 μg/cm2 treatment whereas mortality was 85 and 55% in the 2.08 and 1.04 μg/cm2 treatments, respectively (Table 3). There was no significant difference between the non-target dsRNA treatment and the water control.

Table 2.

PCR amplification efficiency of reference (β-actin) and target genes in various treatments.

t02_01.gif

Fig. 1.

Extent of TH silencing in the larvae treated with various concentrations of dsRNA. The expression levels of TH were analyzed on the 3rd day of feeding on various concentrations of cognate TH dsRNA and 3.12 μg/cm2 non-target DREB1A (control) dsRNA. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean of 3 replicates.

f01_01.jpg

EFFECT OF dsRNA ON LARVAL FEEDING

Larvae in control (water control and DREB1A) treatments consumed a significantly greater (56 and 57%) leaf area compared with larvae in the TH dsRNA treatment (Fig. 2). The mean area of leaf eaten by larvae was inversely proportional to the concentrations of the target dsRNA.

Discussion

We report here that feeding dsRNA led to silencing of TH whereas non-target DREB1A dsRNA did not influence gene expression. Silencing of target gene expression via the feeding route appears to be a more attractive and simpler approach than other methods such as microinjection, droplet feeding, and soaking. Our results of the feeding approach suggest the possibility of developing dsRNA-expressing transgenic plants or products that can be applied in a manner similar to insecticides for field-level pest control (Bettencourt et al. 2002; Huvenne & Smagghe 2010; Mao et al. 2011; Terenius et al. 2011; Hunter et al. 2012). Leaf-coated dsRNA reduced TH transcript levels and eventually led to larval mortality. Diet-delivered dsRNA caused systemic silencing of non-midgut genes in Epiphyas postvittana Walker (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) (Turner et al. 2006; Tomoyasu et al. 2008), and our results show that the non-midgut gene TH was silenced with diet-delivered dsRNA. Together, these results demonstrate that diet-delivered dsRNA can be used to silence non-midgut genes that are suitable targets for RNAimediated pest control.

Table 3.

Percentage of mortality (± SE) of Plutella xylostella (n = 20) in treatments with various concentrations of dsRNA.

t03_01.gif

Fig. 2.

Larval feeding rate in treatments with various concentrations of dsRNA. Here, T1, T2, and T3 are 3 concentrations of TH dsRNA. The initial leaf disc area was 19.16 cm2.

f02_01.jpg

In our experiment, the target gene silencing was strongly correlated with dsRNA concentrations. Similarly, a strong positive correlation was observed between the concentration of dsRNA and silencing of a target gene encoding a digestive protease, chymotrypsin (Asokan et al. 2013). On the other hand, the same study reported negative correlation between dsRNA and expression of a gene encoding juvenile hormone acid methyl transferase (jhamt) in H. armigera (Asokan et al. 2013). These findings indicate that the target gene response to dsRNA is highly variable among genes and species. Our results show that higher concentrations of dsRNA were required to achieve optimal silencing. Higher dsRNA concentrations required to silence any given gene may impact the success of pest management programs at the field level, depending on the ability of transgenic crops to produce the silencing constructs.

In this study, larval feeding was reduced by TH dsRNA treatments compared with controls. In this regard, the sensory organs such as dorsal and ventral organs, terminal organs, and 3 pharyngeal organs are connected by dopaminergic neurons that are involved in triggering aversive (initial recognition and distinguishing of food) and appetitive memory. In Drosophila melanogaster Meigen (Diptera: Drosophilidae), the blocking of dopaminergic neuron output resulted in the loss of appetitive memory that consequently led to reduced feeding (Selcho et al. 2009). Reduced TH levels eventually reduced the DOPA levels, from which we infer a strong correlation between the levels of TH and DOPA (Jaber et al. 1999). Thus, silencing of TH might have reduced the DOPA levels and consequently impaired the aversive and appetitive memory that resulted in lesser feeding by the larvae.

We observed larval mortality, which may be directly due to reduced TH transcript levels. Given the wide range of DOPA-mediated physiological functions in insects, we can only speculate to which of these many functions the proximal causes of the mortality were related. The TH ultimately influences many areas of insect physiology; it has potential for RNAi-mediated management of P. xylostella.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Director, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (IIHR), Bangalore, for the encouragement and facilities. The authors gratefully acknowledge the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi, for funding this study under the Outreach Programme on Management of Sucking Pests in Horticultural Crops (ORPSP). This work is part of the Ph.D. thesis submitted by the first author. All authors declare that no conflict of interest exists.

References Cited

1.

Asokan R, Sharath Chandra G, Manamohan M, Krishna Kumar NK. 2013. Effect of diet delivered various concentrations of double-stranded RNA in silencing a midgut and a non-midgut gene of Helicoverpa armigera. Bulletin of Entomological Research 103: 555–563. Google Scholar

2.

Asokan R, Sharath Chandra G, Manamohan M, Kumar NKK, Sita T. 2014. Response of various target genes to diet-delivered dsRNA mediated RNA interference in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. Journal of Pest Science 87: 163–172. Google Scholar

3.

Baum JA, Bogaert T, Clinton W, Heck GR, Feldmann P, Ilagan O, Johnson S, Plaetinck G, Munyikwa T, Pleau M, Vaughn T, Roberts J. 2007. Control of coleopteran insect pests through RNA interference. Nature Biotechnolgy 25: 1322–1326. Google Scholar

4.

Bettencourt R, Terenius O, Faye I. 2002. Hemolin gene silencing by ds-RNA injected into Cecropia pupae is lethal to next generation embryos. Insect Molecular Biology 11: 267–271. Google Scholar

5.

Birman S, Morgan B, Anzivino M, Hirsh J. 1994. A novel and major isoform of tyrosine hydroxylase in Drosophila is generated by alternative RNA processing. Journal of Biological Chemistry 269: 26559–26567. Google Scholar

6.

Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, Mueller R, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW, Shipleym GL, Vandesompele J, Wittwer CT. 2009. The MIQE guidelines—minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clinical Chemistry 55: 611–622. Google Scholar

7.

Ellango R, Asokan R, Rebijith KB, Riaz Mahmood, Ramamurthy VV. 2014a. Cloning and sequence analysis of four important genes of Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). Entomological News 123: 348–357. Google Scholar

8.

Ellango R, Asokan R, Riaz Mahmood, Ramamurthy VV, Krishna Kumar NK. 2014b. Isolation of new micro RNAs from the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) genome by a computational method. Florida Entomologist 97: 877–885. Google Scholar

9.

Firmino AAP, Fonseca FCDA, Macedo LLPD, Coelho RR, Antonino De Souza JRJD. 2013. Transcriptome analysis in cotton boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis) and RNA interference in insect pests. PLoS One 8: e85079. Google Scholar

10.

Gorman MJ, Chunju A, Kanost M.R. 2007. Characterization of tyrosine hydroxylase from Manduca sexta. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 37: 1327–1337. Google Scholar

11.

Grzywacz D, Rossbach A, Rauf A, Russell D, Srinivasan R, Shelton AM. 2010. Current control methods for diamondback moth and other brassica insect pests and the prospects for improved management with Lepidopteran-resistant Bt vegetable brassicas in Asia and Africa. Crop Protection 29: 68–79. Google Scholar

12.

Hunter WB, Glick E, Paldi N, Bextine BR. 2012. Advances in RNA interference: dsRNA treatment in trees and grapevines for insect pest population suppression. Southwestern Entomologist 37: 85–87. Google Scholar

13.

Huvenne H, Smagghe G. 2010. Mechanisms of dsRNA uptake in insects and potential of RNAi for pest control: a review. Journal of Insect Physiology 56: 227–235. Google Scholar

14.

Jaber M, Dumartin B, Sagne C, Haycock JW, Roubert C, Giros B, Bloch B, Caron MG. 1999. Differential regulation of tyrosine hydroxylase in the basal ganglia of mice lacking the dopamine transporter. European Journal of Neuroscience 11: 3499–3511. Google Scholar

15.

Livak KL, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25: 402–408. Google Scholar

16.

Mao J, Zeng F. 2012. Feeding-based RNA interference of a gap gene is lethal to the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. PLoS One 7: e48718. Google Scholar

17.

Mao YB, Tao XY, Xue XY, Wang LJ, Chen XY. 2011. Cotton plants expressing CYP6AE14 double-stranded RNA show enhanced resistance to bollworms. Transgenic Research 20: 665–673. Google Scholar

18.

Naito Y, Yamuda T, Mastumiya T, Kumiko UT, Saigo K, Morishita S. 2005. ds-Check: highly sensitive off-target search software for double-stranded RNA-mediated RNA interference. Nucleic Acids Research 33: W589–W591. Google Scholar

19.

Ramaseshadri P, Segers G, Flannagan R, Wiggins E, Clinton W. 2013. Physiological and cellular responses caused by RNAi-mediated suppression of Snf7 orthologue in western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera) larvae. PLoS One 8: e54270. Google Scholar

20.

Sayyed AH, Gatsi R, Ibiza-Palacios MS, Escriche B, Wright DJ, Crickmore N. 2005. Common, but complex, mode of resistance of Plutella xylostella to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac. Journal of Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71: 6863–6869. Google Scholar

21.

Selcho M, Pauls D, Han KA, Stocker RF, Thum AS. 2009. The role of dopamine in Drosophila larval classical olfactory conditioning. PLoS One 4: e5897. Google Scholar

22.

Teng X, Zhang Z, He G, Yang L, Li F. 2012.Validation of reference genes for quantitative expression analysis by real-time RT-PCR in four lepidopteran insects. Journal of Insect Science 12: 1–17. Google Scholar

23.

Terenius O, Papanicolaou A, Garbutt JS, Eleftherianos I, Huvenne H, Kanginakudru S, Albrechtsen MANC, Aymeric JL, Barthel A, Bebas P, Bitram K, Bravo A, Chevalier FC, Collinge DP, Crava CM, Maagd RA, Duvic B, Erlandson M, Faye I, Felfoldi G, Fujiwara H, Futahashi R, Gandhe AS, Gatehouse HS, Gatehouse LN, Giebultowicz JM, Gomez I, Grimmelikhuijzen CJP, Groot AT, Hauser F, Heckel DG, Hededus DD, Hrycaj S, Huang L, Hull JJ, Latrou K, Iga M, Kanost MR, Kotwica J, Li C, Li J, Liu J, Lundmark M, Matsumoto S, Meyering-Vos M, Millichap PJ, Monteiro A, Mrinal N, Niimi T, Nowara D, Ohnishi A, Oostra V, Ozaki K, Papakonstantionou M, Popadic A, Rajam MV, Saenko S, Simpson RM, Soberon M, Strand MR, Tomita S, Toprak U, Wang P, Wee CW, Whyard S, Zhang W, Nagaraju J, Ffrench-Constant RH, Herrero S, Gordon K, Swevers L, Smagghe G. 2011. RNA interference in Lepidoptera: an overview of successful and unsuccessful studies and implications for experimental design. Journal of Insect Physiology 57: 231–245. Google Scholar

24.

Tomoyasu Y, Miller SC, Tomita S, Schoppmeier M, Grossmann D. 2008.Exploring systemic RNA interference in insects: a genome-wide survey for RNAi genes in Tribolium. Genome Biology 9: R10. Google Scholar

25.

Turner CT, Davy MW, Macdiarmid RM, Plummer KM, Birch NP, Newcomb RD. 2006. RNA interference in the light brown apple moth, Epiphyas spostvittana (Walker) induced by double-stranded RNA feeding. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 15: 383–391. Google Scholar

26.

Xiong Y, Zeng H, Zhang Y, Xu D, Qiu D. 2013. Silencing the HaHR3 gene by transgenic plant-mediated RNAi to disrupt Helicoverpa armigera development. International Journal of Biological Sciences 9: 370–381. Google Scholar

27.

Zalucki MP, Shabbir A, Silva R, Adamson D, Sheng LS, Furlong MJ. 2012. Estimating the economic cost of one of the world's major insect pests, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae): just how long is a piece of string. Journal of Economic Entomology 105: 1115–1129. Google Scholar

28.

Zha W, Peng X, Chen R, Du B, Zhu L, He G. 2011. Knockdown of midgut genes by dsRNA-transgenic plant-mediated RNA interference in the hemipteran insect Nilaparvata lugens. PLoS One 6: e20504. Google Scholar
R. Ellango, R. Asokan, G. Sharath Chandra, N. K. Krishna Kumar, Riaz Mahmood, and V. V. Ramamurthy "Tyrosine Hydroxylase, a Potential Target for the RNAi-Mediated Management of Diamondback Moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae)," Florida Entomologist 101(1), 1-5, (1 March 2018). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.101.0102
Published: 1 March 2018
KEYWORDS
ARN de doble cadena
control de plagas
double-stranded RNA
interferencia de ARN
pest Management
Plutella xylostella
RNA interference
Back to Top