Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2018 Susceptibility of Tetranychus ogmophallos (Acari: Tetranychidae) to Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae
Tamiris dos Santos Barbosa, Daniel Junior de Andrade, Ricardo Antonio Polanczyk, Rogério Teixeira Duarte
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Tetranychus ogmophallos Ferreira & Flechtmann (Acari: Tetranychidae) is an emergent pest in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L. [Fabaceae]) and an important pest of forage peanut (A. pintoi Krapov. & W.C. Greg. [Fabaceae]). The susceptibility of T. ogmophallos to Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin (Cordycipitaceae) and Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikof) Sorokin (Clavicipitaceae) was evaluated under laboratory and greenhouse conditions. In the laboratory, adult T. ogmophallos females were treated with B. bassiana and M. anisopliae using a Potter's tower, and in the greenhouse, bio-insecticides were applied on infested peanut plants. Both fungal suspensions containing 108 conidia per mL caused greater mortality in adult T. ogmophallos females. At 7 d after treatment under laboratory conditions, B. bassiana resulted in 100% mortality and M. anisopliae almost 100% mortality. Bio-insecticides substantially reduced the mite population density under greenhouse conditions when applied to infested peanut plants, with mite populations reduced 84% and 92% by B. bassiana and M. anisopliae, respectively. Under greenhouse conditions, the increase in the number of mites per plant observed at 15 d after treatment suggests the need to repeat the entomopathogen application. Our results demonstrate that B. bassiana and M. anisopliae are promising biological agents to control T. ogmophallos. The practical application of this work for managing T. ogmophallos population on peanut crop is discussed.

Peanut red mite Tetranychus ogmophallos Ferreira & Flechtmann (Acari: Tetranychidae) is considered an important emergent pest in Brazil because it causes economic and environmental losses (Lourenção et al. 2001; Melville 2015). This mite is found only on Arachis spp. plants in Brazil; therefore, it has quarantine importance for many countries (Bonato et al. 2000; Migeon & Dokeld 2007).

Tetranychus ogmophallos causes reduction in the productivity of peanut, Arachis hypogaea L. (Fabaceae), and when infestation occurs in the early crop stages, it may cause plant death (Melville 2015). This mite also causes damage in forage peanut, Arachis pintoi Krapov. & W.C. Gregory (Fabaceae), used as an ornamental plant and for animal feed (Ferreira & Flechtmann 1997). Bonato et al. (2000) verified that T. ogmophallos survived in the laboratory on a diet of bean leaves and soybeans plants. In addition, T. ogmophallos fertility was higher on a diet of bean leaves compared to peanut leaves.

In recent years, several T. ogmophallos outbreaks have been observed in peanut producing areas in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, which produces approximately 90% of the national peanut production (IBGE 2016). Several factors are identified as responsible for outbreaks, such as the banning of some broad spectrum insecticides and acaricides, frequent dry spells, use of new varieties with characteristics that may favor the development of mite populations, and the hormesis effect caused by new pesticides (Guedes & Cutler 2014; Guedes et al. 2016).

Applications of acaricides to reduce peanut red mite populations in peanuts crops have been the only mite control measure used. However, this strategy has caused great negative impact on environment and human health (Guedes et al. 2016). As an alternative to synthetic pesticides, fungal entomopathogens are considered to be potential agents to control mite populations. For example, Chandler et al. (2000) collected records of 58 fungal species infecting at least 73 mite species. Among fungal entomopathogens, Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin (Cordycipitaceae) and Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikof) Sorokin (Clavicipitaceae) species stand out (Oliveira et al. 2004; Lacey 2017; Moro et al. 2011). To date, few pathogens have been developed as commercial acaricides due to mass production issues or poor performance under field conditions (Arthurs & Bruck 2017).

Numerous mite species, including tetranychids, are infected by entomopathogenic fungi, predominantly Entomophthorales (e.g., Neozygites floridana) and Hypocreales (e.g., B. bassiana, Isaria spp. (formerly Paecilomyces), M. anisopliae, Hirsutella thompsonii (Fischer), Cladosporium cladosporioides (Fresen), Cephalosporium diversiphialidum Balazy, and Lecanicillium lecanii species (Zimmermann) [formerly Verticillium lecanii (Zimmermann)]) (Chandler et al. 2000; Barreto et al. 2004; Oliveira et al. 2004; Maketon et al. 2008; Bugeme et al. 2009; Moro et al. 2011; Sanjaya et al. 2013; Geroh et al. 2015; Lacey 2017; Nakai & Lacey 2017).

Beauveria bassiana and M. anisopliae caused between 22 and 82% mortality among adult Tetranychus evansi Baker and Pritchard (Prostigmata: Tetranychidae) females under laboratory conditions (Bugeme et al. 2008; Wekesa et al. 2005). Both entomopathogens cause > 65% mortality among Tetranychus urticae (Koch) (Acari: Tetranychidae), which is a very important agricultural pest in Brazil (Alves et al. 2002; Tamai et al. 2002; Bugeme et al. 2009; Shi & Feng 2009; Moro et al. 2011; Cerqueira et al. 2017). Six B. bassiana isolates and 7 M. anisopliae isolates were pathogenic to Tetranychus kanzawai (Kishida) (Acari: Tetranychidae), causing > 85% mortality under laboratory conditions, evidencing high potential as a biological control agent (Sanjaya et al. 2013).

The use of fungal entomopathogens for the control of phytophagous mites is restricted to a few species (Lacey 2017), and there are no known reports of fungal entomopathogens for control of T. ogmophallos. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the susceptibility of T. ogmophallos to B. bassiana and M. anisopliae under laboratory and greenhouse conditions.

Material and Methods

COLLECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF TETRANYCHUS OGMOPHALLOS

Tetranychus ogmophallos colonies used in experiments were sourced originally from a peanut field (A. hypogea cv. ‘Granoleico’), located at the Faculty of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences (UNESP/FCAV), Campus of Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil (21.25611°S, 48.31611°W). Mites were reared on peanut plants in 8 L pots (with fertilized soil) and kept at 25.3 °C, 79.3% RH, and 12:12 h (L:D) photoperiod. Plants were replaced monthly by healthy plants simply by touching 1 plant to the other for mite migration. Irrigation was performed with manual irrigator every 2 d in order to guarantee sufficient moisture for the development of plants.

FUNGAL ENTOMOPATHOGENS

Two commercial products formulated with B. bassiana and M. anisopliae were used in experiments. Bio-insecticides were acquired from Koppert Brasil Company (Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil) and kept at -4 °C in a freezer.

LABORATORY EXPERIMENT

Under laboratory conditions, the susceptibility of T. ogmophallos to B. bassiana and M. anisopliae was evaluated in Dec 2015. Both treatments used a concentration of 108 conidia per mL, and a control treatment using deionized water. Each treatment was repeated 10 times and in all 3 treatments, Tween® 20 (LabSynth Ltda., Diadema, São Paulo, Brazil) spreader sticker (0.05%) was added.

Experimental units were prepared with Petri dishes (90 mm diam × 15 mm ht) containing a 10-mm layer with foam and hydrophilic wet cotton. Arachis hypogea cv. ‘Granoleico’ peanut leaflet without pesticide residue was placed on each Petri dish on the cotton layer. The wet cotton served as a barrier to confine the mites and preserve the leaflet's turgor. Each leaflet was transferred with the aid of a thin paintbrush, and 15 adult female mites of T. ogmophallos from the colony were transferred using a stereomicroscope (model Stemi 2000-C, Carl Zeiss Corporation, Jena, Germany). Treatments (fungal suspensions and deionized water) were applied directly on mites using a Potter's tower calibrated at 4 lbf.pol-2, with 0.5 mL of suspension per leaflet. After applications, the experimental units were sealed with plastic film to maintain humidity and kept in climatized chamber at 25 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 10% RH, and 12:12 h (L:D) photoperiod. Mite survival was assessed at 1, 3, 5, and 7 d after applications.

The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design, and data were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the averages of mite survival percentages compared by the Tukey test (P < 0.05) (SAS 2002).

GREENHOUSE EXPERIMENT

This experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions (averages 25.3 °C and 79.0% RH) during the period from Nov 2015 to Feb 2016. Four treatments were evaluated: (1) deionized water + Tween® 20 spreader sticker (0.05%) (negative control treatment); (2) synthetic acaricide ‘fenpyroximate’ (Ortus? 50SC — Arysta Lifescience do Brasil Ind. Quim. e Agropec. Ltda., São Paulo, Brazil ) at dosage of 100 mL of c.p. per 100 L (positive control treatment); (3) B. bassiana suspension (108 conidia per mL) + Tween? 20 spreader sticker (0.05%); and (4) M. anisopliae suspension (108 conidia per mL) + Tween® 20 spreader sticker (0.05%). For application of treatments, a hand sprayer with sufficient volume to provide complete plant coverage was used.

Pots with 8 L capacity containing 1 A. hypogea cv. ‘Granoleico’ peanut plant and a mixture of soil, sand, and bovine manure (2:1:1) as substrate were used. There were 10 pots for each treatment (10 replicates). At 75 d after seedling emergence, at the reproductive stage (R5), 100 adult T. ogmophallos females were transferred to each preinspected plant using a paintbrush.

Five d after mite transfer to clean plants, treatments were applied as part of a randomized block design and evaluations were performed at 5, 10, and 15 d after applications. The number of live mites in each treatment was estimated by counting mites present on 2 leaves per plant (1 leaf in the lower stratum and 1 leaf in the upper stratum of plants). The numerical data (insect abundance) were transformed into log (x + 1) to be submitted to analysis of variance, and the average number of mites per plant was compared by the Tukey test (P < 0.05) (SAS 2002). In order to calculate the efficiency of treatments, the Henderson-Tilton formula was used (Henderson & Tilton 1955). The average number of mites per plant stratum was analyzed in a 4 × 3 × 2 factorial scheme: 4 treatments (deionized water, fenpyroximate, B. bassiana, and M. anisopliae), 3 evaluation periods (5, 10, and 15 d after applications) and 2 strata.

Results

For both fungal entomopathogens, a gradual reduction in the percentage of adult T. ogmophallos females was observed throughout the study period at laboratory conditions. On the first d after application, a significant reduction in the number of surviving mites in treatments with fungal entomopathogens was observed, when compared to the control (F = 76.05; df = 2,27; P < 0.05), represented by 28.3 and 15.9% of individuals surviving in treatments with M. anisopliae and B. bassiana, respectively (Fig. 1).

At 3 d after applications, the percentage of surviving adult T. ogmophallos females was 13.1 and 3.4% for treatments with application of M. anisopliae and B. bassiana, respectively, significantly differing from control (F = 170.08; df = 2,27; P < 0.05) (Fig. 1). The same situation was observed at 5 d after applications (F = 562.27; df = 2,27; P < 0.05), where survival of tetranychids was 5.1% (M. anisopliae) and 2.7% (B. bassiana) (F = 404.18, df = 2.27, P < 0.05), with survival of 3.9% of adult females for treatment with M. anisopliae and total mortality for B. bassiana (Fig. 1).

Regarding the efficacy of fungal entomopathogens in the greenhouse on T. ogmophallos, control efficacy of 68.41 and 68.68% was observed at 5 d after applications for B. bassiana and M. anisopliae, respectively (Fig. 2A). At 10 d after applications, control efficacy increased to 83.86% (B. bassiana) and 92.18% (M. anisopliae) (Fig. 2B); however, control efficacy decreased to 71.82% (B. bassiana) and 59.34% (M. anisopliae) at 15 d after applications (Fig. 2C).

The population density of T. ogmophallos on peanut plants, under greenhouse conditions, at 5 d after application was not significantly different when fenpyroximate (synthetic acaricide) and fungal entomopathogen treatments were compared (Fig. 2A). There was a significant difference between the treatments with chemical acaricide and the negative control with water + adjuvant (Fig. 2A) (F = 10.48; df = 3,36; P < 0.05).

Fig. 1.

Survival (%) (± SE) of adult Tetranychus ogmophallos females 1, 3, 5, and 7 d after application for treatments with Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae at laboratory conditions. Values within a time interval topped by the same letter did not differ significantly from each other by the Tukey test (P < 0.05). Error bar corresponds to the standard error (± SE).

f01_249.jpg

Fig. 2.

Mean number (± SE) of Tetranychus ogmophallos on peanut leaves 5 (A), 10 (B), and 15 (C) d after application. Values within a time interval topped by the same letter did not differ significantly from each other by the Tukey test (P < 0.05). Error bar corresponds to the standard error (± SE).

f02_249.jpg

At 10 d after applications, a reduction in the number of T. ogmophallos was observed in treatments with entomopathogens, significantly differing from the other treatments (F = 30.61; df = 3,36; P < 0.05). In this evaluation, the number of mites per plant in treatments with B. bassiana and M. anisopliae was 68.3 ± 26.1 mites per plant and 33.1 ± 12.3 mites per plant, respectively. There were increases in mite densities at 15 d after applications in treatments with microorganisms; however, the mite densities were significantly lower compared to the negative control (F = 50.6; df = 3,36; P < 0.05) (Fig. 2C). In this evaluation, there were 201.2 ± 29.6 mites per plant in the treatment with B. bassiana and 290.3 ± 42.2 mites per plant in the treatment with M. anisopliae. In the treatment with fenpyroximate, no mites were found on plants at evaluations performed at 10 and 15 d after applications (Figs. 2B, C).

At 5 d after application, the miticide treatments were affected by plant stratum, with fewer mites present in the upper region of the plant. However, at this time there were no significant differences among the miticide treatments. At 10 d after application, possibly due to the drastic population reduction in all treatments, no difference in the number of mites per plant stratum was observed (Table 1). At 15 d after applications, B. bassiana displayed better control in the lower stratum, but M. anisopliae did not differ from the negative control in the lower stratum. In the upper region of the plant, the result was opposite to that observed in the lower stratum, as evidenced by the low population density of T. ogmophallos in the M. anisopliae treatment (Table 1).

Table 1.

Mean number (± SE) of Tetranychus ogmophallos in the lower and upper regions of peanut plants 5, 10, and 15 d after application (DAA).

t01_249.gif

Discussion

Beauveria bassiana and M. anisopliae were pathogenic to T. ogmophallos, which is the first report on the pathogenicity of these fungi to this mite species. Other studies also have reported the pathogenicity of B. bassiana and M. anisopliae to tetranychid species, such as T. urticae (Alves et al. 2002; Tamai et al. 2002; Shi & Feng 2009; Moro et al. 2011), T. evansi (Wekesa et al. 2005), T. kanzawai (Sanjaya et al. 2013), Mononychellus tanajoa (Bondar) (Acari: Tetranychidae) (Barreto et al. 2004), and Oligonychus yothersi (McGregor) (Acari: Tetranychidae) (Oliveira et al. 2002, 2004).

The high mortality of T. ogmophallos females observed for all treatments (Fig. 1) may be related to the concentration of the conidial suspensions used (Alves et al. 2002). At concentrations of 105, 106, and 107 conidia per mL of B. bassiana, aiming to control adult T. urticae females under laboratory conditions, Alves et al. (2002) observed mortality below 45.0%, while at concentration of 108 conidia per mL, the mortality rate of these tetranychids was 74.4%. Geroh et al. (2015) also observed a lower number of individuals surviving the use of more concentrated B. bassiana conidia suspensions, with mortality of T. urticae adults ranging from 45.6 to 91.0% using concentrations between 105 and 1012 conidia per mL.

The methodology used also should be considered an important point in relation to values found for the survival rate of T. ogmophallos. According to Geroh et al. (2015), the application of an entomopathogen directly on mites was more reliable in assessing potential mortality of T. urticae when compared to treatment of food.

Relative to plant strata, there were not many differences in the effectiveness of the entomopathognes for the first 10 d after treatment. After 15 d, B. bassiana was more effective in the lower stratum (as compared to M. anisopliae) (Table 1). In tomato cultivation under greenhouse conditions, Wekesa et al. (2005) observed that B. bassiana was efficient in controlling T. evansi in the upper and lower strata of plants, when compared to treatments with M. anisopliae at 7 and 14 d after applications. Stratum-specific responses may be due to the variation in moisture and temperature throughout the canopy of plants. For example, Shi & Feng (2009) evaluated 2 B. bassiana and 2 M. anisopliae isolates for spider mites in cotton in China and obtained desirable control over a period of 30 to 35 d with efficacy > 80%. High humidity in the canopy and moderate daily mean temperatures were advantageous to control.

This mite has caused many problems for forage peanut, which is used for animal feed (Ferreira & Flechtmann 1997; Santos 2016). Biological control with fungal entomopathogens may prove to be a useful tool to control T. ogmophallos in forages because the use of fungal entomopathogens presents minimal risks to human and animal health when compared to the use of synthetic pesticides (Zimmerman 2007; Hu et al. 2016).

The results of our research indicate that both entomopathogenic fungi have potential for managing T. ogmophallos in peanut crop. However, bioassays in the field are required to prove the real potential of these entomopathogens. In the field, the entomopathogenic fungi may be influenced by abiotic factors, principally temperature, relative humidity, and solar radiation, which may affect the development and reproductive parameters of these microorganisms (Bugeme et al. 2008; Oliveira et al. 2016).

The time of spraying entomopathogenic fungi also is a limiting factor for use of these microorganisms in the field to control the genus Tetranychus. High temperature and low relative humidity may be responsible for the failure of microbial control with entomopathogenic fungi. In the state of São Paulo, Brazil, the peanut crop is cultivated in the summer season, with medium temperature and high relative humidity, which makes it possible to use the formulated products based on M. anisopliae and B. bassiana, with the recommendation to spray in the evening, at temperatures between 25 to 35 °C and relative humidity of 60% (Koppert 2018a, b).

References Cited

1.

Alves SB, Rossi LS, Lopes RB, Tamai MA, Pereira RM. 2002. Beauveria bassiana yeast phase on agar medium and its pathogenicity against Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) and Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 81: 70–77. Google Scholar

2.

Arthurs SP, Bruck DJ. 2017. Microbial control of nursery ornamental and landscape plant pests, pp. 355–365 In Lacey LA [ed.], Microbial Control of Pests. Elsevier, London, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

3.

Barreto RS, Marques EJ, Gondim Jr MGC, Oliveira JV. 2004. Selection of Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. and Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) Sorok. for the control of the mite Mononychellus tanajoa (Bondar). Scientia Agricola 61: 659–664. Google Scholar

4.

Bonato O, Santarosa PL, Ribeiro G, Lucchini F. 2000. Suitability of three legumes for development of Tetranychus ogmophallos (Acari: Tetranychidae). Florida Entomological Society 83: 203–205. Google Scholar

5.

Bugeme DM, Maniania NK, Knapp M, Boga HI. 2008. Effect of temperature on virulence of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae isolates to Tetranychus evansi. Experimental and Applied Acarology 46: 275–285. Google Scholar

6.

Bugeme DM, Knapp M, Boga HI, Wanjoya AK, Maniania NK. 2009. Influence of temperature on virulence of fungal isolates of Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana to the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae. Mycopathologia 167: 221–227. Google Scholar

7.

Cerqueira DTR, Raetano CG, Dal Pogetto MHFA, Carvalho MM, Prado EP, Costa SIA, Moreira CAF. 2017. Optimization of spray deposition and Tetranychus urticae control with air assisted and electrostatic sprayer. Scientia Agricola 74: 32–40. Google Scholar

8.

Chandler D, Davidson G, Pell JK, Ball BV, Shaw K, Sunderland KD. 2000. Fungal biocontrol of Acari. Biocontrol Science and Technology 10: 357–384. Google Scholar

9.

Ferreira DNM, Flechtmann CHW. 1997. Two new phytophagous mites (Acari: Tetranychidae, Eriophyidae) from Arachis pintoi from Brazil, Nova Zelândia. Systematic and Applied Acarology 2: 181–188. Google Scholar

10.

Geroh M, Gulati R, Tehri K. 2015. Determination of lethal concentration and lethal time of entomopathogen Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin against Tetranychus urticae. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 7: 523–528. Google Scholar

11.

Guedes RNC, Cutler GC. 2014. Insecticide induced hormesis and arthropod pest management. Pest Management Science 70: 690–697. Google Scholar

12.

Guedes RNC, Smagghe G, Stark JD, Desneux N. 2016. Pesticide-induced stress in arthropod pests for optimized integrated pest management programs. Annual Review of Entomology 61: 43–62. Google Scholar

13.

Henderson CF, Tilton EW. 1955. Tests with acaricides against the brown wheat mite. Journal of Economic Entomology 48: 157–161. Google Scholar

14.

Hu Q, Li F, Zhang Y. 2016. Risks of mycotoxins from mycoinsecticides to humans. BioMed Research International 2016: 1–13. Google Scholar

15.

IBGE. 2016. Levantamento sistemático da produção agrícola: produção agrícola 2016,  http://ftp.ibge.gov.br/Producao_Agricola/Levanta-mento_Sistematico_da_Producao_Agricola_[mensal]/Comentarios/lspa_201606comentarios.pdf (last accessed 2 Aug 2016). Google Scholar

16.

Koppert. 2018a. Boveril,  http://koppert.com.br/produtos/boveril/ (last accessed 2 Feb 2018). Google Scholar

17.

Koppert. 2018b. Metarril,  http://koppert.com.br/produtos/metarril/ (last accessed 2 Feb 2018). Google Scholar

18.

Lacey LA. 2017. Entomopathogens used as microbial control agents, pp. 2–12 In Lacey LA [ed.], Microbial Control of Pests. Elsevier, London, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

19.

Lourenção AL, Kasai FS, Návia D, Godoy IJ, Flechtmann CHW. 2001. Ocorrência de Tetranychus ogmophallos Ferreira e Flechtmann (Acari: Tetranychidae) em amendoim no Estado de São Paulo. Neotropical Entomology 30: 495–496. Google Scholar

20.

Maketon M, Orosz-Coghlan P, Sinprasert J. 2008. Evaluation of Metarhizium anisopliae (Deuteromycota: Hyphomycetes) for control of broad mite Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Acari: Tarsonemidae) in mulberry. Experimental and Applied Acarology 46: 157–167. Google Scholar

21.

Melville CC. 2015. Distribuição espacial e determinação da depreciação quantitativa e qualitativa causada por Tetranychus ogmophallus (Acari: Tetranychidae) ao amendoinzeiro. Dissertação (Mestrado em Entomologia Agrícola) - Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho,” Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil. Google Scholar

22.

Migeon A, Dorkeld F. 2007. Spider Mites Web: a comprehensive database for the Tetranychidae.  http://montpellier.inra.fr/CBGP/spmweb (last accessed 1 May 2017). Google Scholar

23.

Moro LB, Polanczyk RA, Pratissoli D, Carvalho JR, Franco CR. 2011. Potencial do uso de fungos entomopatogênicos no controle de Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) em mamoeiro: efeito de cultivares sobre a patogenicidade. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 78: 267–272. Google Scholar

24.

Nakai M, Lacey LA. 2017. Microbial control of insect pests of tea and coffee, pp. 223–236 In Lacey LA [ed.], Microbial Control of Pests. Elsevier, London, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

25.

Oliveira RC, Alves LFA, Neves PMOJ. 2002. Suscetibilidade de Oligonychus yothersi (Acari: Tetranychidae) ao fungo Beauveria bassiana. Scientia Agricola 59: 187–189. Google Scholar

26.

Oliveira MT, Monteiro AC, La Scala Júnior N, Barbosa JC, Mochi DA. 2016. Sensibilidade de isolados de fungos entomopatogênicos às radiações solar, ultravioleta e à temperatura. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 83: 1–7. Google Scholar

27.

Oliveira RC, Neves PMOJ, Alves LFA. 2004. Seleção de fungos entomopatogênicos para o controle de Oligonychus yothersi (McGregor) (Acari: Tetranychidae), na cultura da erva-mate (Ilex paraguariensis St. Hill.). Neotropical Entomology 33: 347–351. Google Scholar

28.

Sanjaya Y, Ocampo VR, Caoili BL. 2013. Selection of entomopathogenic fungi against the red spider mite Tetranychus kanzawai (Kishida) (Tetranychidae: Acarina). Arthropods 4: 208–215. Google Scholar

29.

Santos RS. 2016. Infestação de Tetranychus ogmophallos Ferreira & Flechtmann (Acari: Tetranychidae) em Amendoim Forrageiro (Arachis pintoi Krapov. & Greg.) nos Estados do Acre e Minas Gerais. EntomoBrasilis 9: 69–72. Google Scholar

30.

SAS Institute. 2002. User's guide: statistics, version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, North Carolina, USA. Google Scholar

31.

Shi WB, Feng MG. 2009. Effect of fungal infection on reproductive potential and survival time of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology 48: 229–237. Google Scholar

32.

Tamai MA, Alves SB, Almeida JEM de, Faion M. 2002. Avaliação de fungos entomopatogênicos para o controle de Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 69: 77–84. Google Scholar

33.

Wekesa VW, Maniania NK, Knapp M, Boga H. 2005. Pathogenicity of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae to the tobacco spider mite Tetranychus evansi. Experimental and Applied Acarology 36: 41–50. Google Scholar

34.

Zimmermann G. 2007. Review on safety of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae. Biocontrol Science Technology 17: 879–920. Google Scholar
Tamiris dos Santos Barbosa, Daniel Junior de Andrade, Ricardo Antonio Polanczyk, and Rogério Teixeira Duarte "Susceptibility of Tetranychus ogmophallos (Acari: Tetranychidae) to Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae," Florida Entomologist 101(2), 249-253, (1 June 2018). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.101.0215
Published: 1 June 2018
KEYWORDS
ácaro-vermelho-do-amendoim
amendoim forrageiro
Arachis hypogaea
Arachis pintoi
controle microbiano
forage peanut
microbial control
Back to Top