Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 September 2018 Complex of Primary and Secondary Parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae and Signiphoridae) of Hypogeococcus spp. Mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in the New World
Serguei V. Triapitsyn, María B. Aguirre, Guillermo A. Logarzo, Stephen D. Hight, Matthew A. Ciomperlik, Paul F. Rugman-Jones, Jose C. Verle Rodrigues
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Parasitoids, both primary and secondary (hyperparasitoids), of Hypogeococcus spp. mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) are reviewed to report results of the surveys in the New World conducted during 2009 to 2017 for prospective natural enemies of the Harrisia cactus mealybug, Hypogeococcus sp., which is devastating native cacti in Puerto Rico and threatening cacti in the adjacent Caribbean islands. Five species of Encyrtidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) are recorded as primary parasitoids of Hypogeococcus spp., including the newly described Leptomastidea hypogeococci Triapitsyn sp. n., which is the only species of the genus Leptomastidea García Mercet in the New World where the clava of the female antenna is contrastingly white. Genetic analysis of the individuals of L. hypogeococci from Argentina, Brazil, and Puerto Rico (USA) corroborates the morphological data that the same species occurs in South America, the Caribbean islands, and Florida (USA). A key to the New World species of Leptomastidea is given and taxonomic notes are provided on its other known species in the Neotropical region. Leptomastidea antillicola Dozier, syn. n. from Puerto Rico is synonymized under L. abnormis (Girault). Based on the presented molecular data, Anagyrus ciomperliki Triapitsyn syn. n. (Encyrtidae), originally described from Puerto Rico, is synonymized under A. quilmes Triapitsyn, Logarzo & Aguirre, where the known distributional range is expanded to also include Brazil. Anagyrus cachamai Triapitsyn, Logarzo & Aguirre, A. lapachosus Triapitsyn, Aguirre & Logarzo, and A. quilmes are newly recorded from Paraguay. The previously unknown male of Prochiloneurus argentinensis (De Santis) (Encyrtidae) is described from Misiones Province of Argentina, and that of P. narendrani Noyes & Triapitsyn is described from Mona Island, Puerto Rico. So far, Anagyrus cachamai and A. lapachosus are considered to be the primary target species for introduction from Argentina and Paraguay into Puerto Rico for the biological control of Harrisia cactus mealybug. The holotype of Anagyrus tanystis De Santis from Buenos Aires, Argentina, host associations are unknown, and is illustrated to facilitate its recognition from other congeneric species.

The mealybug Hypogeococcus sp. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) has become a serious pest of native and endemic cacti in Puerto Rico (USA) (Pérez Sandi y Cuen et al. 2006; Jenkins et al. 2014; Carrera-Martínez et al. 2015) since it was first intercepted on Portulaca oleracea (Portulacaceae) ornamentals in San Juan in 2000 and then sighted on cacti in the Guánica State Forest and Biosphere Reserve in 2005 (Segarra-Carmona et al. 2010; Zimmermann et al. 2010). The mealybug pest in Puerto Rico was reported as Hypogeococcus pungens Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) (Segarra-Carmona et al. 2010; Zimmermann et al. 2010), the successful biological control agent released for introduced and invasive cactus in Australia and South Africa (McFadyen & Tomley 1978, 1981; White & Donnelly 1993; Paterson et al. 2011). Hypogeococcus pungens often is referred to as the Harrisia cactus mealybug due to the successful control of the initial primary target cactus weed in Australia, Harrisia martinii (Cactaceae). In Puerto Rico, the Harrisia cactus mealybug impacts 7 of 14 native cactus species occurring in dry forests, including 3 endemic and 2 endangered species in the subfamily Cactoideae of the family Cactaceae, by interfering with sexual reproduction and causing large tissue deformations (Fig. 1) that often leads to mortality (Carrera-Martínez et al. 2015). If the Harrisia cactus mealybug pest reported in Puerto Rico spreads beyond its current distribution range, species of cactus throughout the Caribbean region and North America, including Mexico, are at risk of being negatively affected by the insect (Pérez Sandi y Cuen et al. 2006).

The taxonomic identity of the Harrisia cactus mealybug is under question (Aguirre et al. 2016). As a biological control agent, the Harrisia cactus mealybug was collected originally on species of Cactoideae from western Argentina to central Paraguay and identified as Hypogeococcus festerianus (Lizer y Trelles) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) (McFadyen & Tomley 1978, 1981). Based on morphological characters of adult female mealybugs, the Harrisia cactus mealybug's identity was changed to H. pungens, a newly described species from Argentina; however, it was collected from a non-cactus host plant, Alternanthera pungens (Amaranthaceae) (Granara de Willink 1981). The host plants used by the Harrisia cactus mealybug introduced as a biological control agent into Australia and South Africa consist only of species in Cactoideae (Zimmermann & Pérez Sandi y Cuen 2010; McFadyen 2012; Aguirre et al. 2016). In addition to these 2 countries, the distribution of H. pungens has expanded, due to inadvertent introductions from its apparently native South America, to locations in Italy, Spain, US Virgin Islands, Barbados, the Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, and the USA states of Florida, California, and Hawaii (Hosking et al. 1988; Halbert 1996; Mazzeo et al. 2008; Hodges & Hodges 2009; Zimmermann & Pérez Sandi y Cuen 2010; Beltrà & Soto 2011; German-Ramirez et al. 2014). The host range of the Harrisia cactus mealybug identified as H. pungens includes species of plants in the families Cactaceae, Amaranthaceae, and Portulacaceae (Ben-Dov 1994; Claps & de Haro 2001; Hodges & Hodges 2009). Based on biological and molecular genetics studies conducted in Argentina on H. pungens populations derived from Amaranthaceae and Cactaceae, it appears that H. pungens is a species complex (Aguirre et al. 2016). In general, Aguirre et al. (2016) propose the following: (1) the species introduced to Australia is an undescribed species, but is the same species that attacks Cactaceae in northern Argentina; (2) the species using Amaranthaceae in Argentina is H. pungens sensu stricto (s. str.), but it does not attack Cactaceae in the laboratory or the field; and (3) the Puerto Rico pest Harrisia cactus mealybug species appears to be an evolutionary lineage independent from H. pungens s. str.

Fig. 1.

A gall-like formation caused by the feeding of Harrisia cactus mealybug, Hypogeococcus sp., on Stenocereus fimbriatus columnar cactus in Caja de Muertos Island, Puerto Rico.

f01_411.jpg

A classical biological control program was initiated in Puerto Rico to search for natural enemies of the Harrisia cactus mealybug in what was thought to be its South American native range. However, due to the revelation that the Harrisia cactus mealybug appears to be a species complex, the natural enemy selected to manage the Puerto Rico Harrisia cactus mealybug depends on the correct identification of the pest: a standard classical biological control program would be initiated when the pest can be identified and its origin known; and a new association biological control program would be initiated when the origin of the pest is unknown or the pest cannot be identified to species. Additional biological, taxonomic, and molecular studies are being conducted (currently in progress in collaboration with mealybug taxonomists and molecular biologists in Argentina) with populations of H. pungens on different host plants and from different locations, including Argentina, Paraguay, Brazil, Australia, Florida, and Caribbean Islands, to clarify the identities of H. pungens complex components, in particular the pest species of Puerto Rico. In addition, natural enemies, particularly parasitoids associated with the mealybugs, were reared from collections for identification of possible agents for biological control of the Harrisia cactus mealybug in Puerto Rico.

Several species of predators as well as 2 primary and 2 secondary parasitoid species, all belonging to the family Encyrtidae (Hymenoptera), were reared from the Harrisia cactus mealybug since 2009 when a brief survey of the Harrisia cactus mealybug was conducted in Puerto Rico and Barbados (M. A. Ciomperlik, unpublished data). One of the primary parasitoids, an undescribed species of Leptomastidea García Mercet (Encyrtidae), was collected from both Puerto Rico and Barbados; also, an undescribed species of Anagyrus Howard (Encyrtidae) was collected from Puerto Rico, and was subsequently described by Triapitsyn (2016) as Anagyrus ciomperliki Triapitsyn. Also, Segarra-Carmona et al. (2010) reported 4 species of predators associated with the Harrisia cactus mealybug on Pilosocereus royenii (Cactaceae) in Puerto Rico.

Since 2010, surveys for natural enemies of H. pungens and other congeneric mealybug species have been conducted in South America, the putative origin of the pest. Also, in Puerto Rico, persistent collections of parasitoids of the Harrisia cactus mealybug have been conducted since 2012. As a result of these surveys, several species of parasitoid wasps have been identified as natural enemies of the Harrisia cactus mealybug. Five primary and 3 secondary parasitoids in 2 families of Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera), Encyrtidae and Signiphoridae, were identified, and 5 were described as new species (Triapitsyn et al. 2014a, 2014b, 2016; Triapitsyn 2016; Noyes & Triapitsyn 2018).

Here we present a review of the results of our surveys of the primary and secondary parasitoids of Hypogeococcus spp. mealybugs in the New World (i.e., Argentina, Barbados, Brazil, Puerto Rico, Paraguay, and USA [Florida]) conducted during 2009 to 2017. We also describe an additional primary parasitoid of Hypogeococcus spp. and present data and results of other, relevant taxonomic and genetic studies.

Materials and Methods

COLLECTING AND REARING OF MEALYBUGS AND THEIR PARASITOIDS

Adult wasps emerged from mummies of the adult mealybugs of Hypogeococcus spp. infesting various Amaranthaceae, Cactaceae, and Portulacaceae in Argentina, Barbados, Brazil, Florida (USA), Paraguay, and Puerto Rico.

In Puerto Rico, gall-like malformations were collected from the localities of Guánica and Cabo Rojo monthly, and Harrisia cactus mealybug mummies were collected and placed in gelatin capsules for emergence of parasitoids. In addition, galls also were placed in Berlese's funnels for collection of potential natural enemies. Leptomastidea sp., described here as a new taxon, was in all cases the most abundant parasitoid species associated with the Puerto Rican Harrisia cactus mealybug. Colonies of Harrisia cactus mealybug were obtained and established on Alternanthera sp. (Amaranthaceae), specific varieties of Portulaca spp. (Portulacaceae) (J. C. V. Rodrigues, unpublished data), and on Leptocereus quadricostatus (Cactaceae) (La Quay-Velázquez et al. 2015). Harrisia cactus mealybug colonies then were used for rearing the Leptomastidea sp. parasitoid for several generations in the laboratory at the University of Puerto Rico.

TAXONOMIC STUDIES

Terms used for morphological features are those of Gibson (1997). Abbreviations used are the following: F = antennal funicle segment; mps = multiporous plate sensillum or sensilla on the antennal flagellar segments (= longitudinal sensillum or sensilla or sensory ridge(s) of other authors).

Most specimens were dried from ethanol using a critical point drier, then point-mounted and labeled. Selected specimens were dissected further and slide-mounted in Canada balsam. Slide mounts were examined under a Zeiss Axioskop 2 plus compound microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Thornwood, New York, New York, USA) and photographed using the Auto-Montage® system (Syncroscopy, Princeton, New Jersey, USA). Photographs were retouched where necessary using Adobe Photoshop® (Adobe Systems, Inc., San Jose, California, USA). Acronyms for depositories of specimens are: The Natural History Museum, London, England, UK [BMNH]; Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Buenos Aires, Argentina [MACN]; Museum of Entomology and Tropical Biodiversity, University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA [METB]; Museo de La Plata, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina [MLPA]; Entomology Research Museum, University of California at Riverside, California, USA [UCRC]; and National Museum of Natural History, Washington, District of Columbia, USA [USNM].

DNA EXTRACTION AND AMPLIFICATION

DNA was extracted from individual wasps using the “HotSHOT” method of Truett et al. (2000), in a total volume of 80 μL. This nondestructive method allowed for the recovery and slide-mounting of each specimen following extraction; each slide was then labeled with the assigned P. F. Rugman-Jones' primary molecular voucher PR number and UCRC database UCRC ENT number. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to amplify a section of the D2 domain of 28S nuclear ribosomal RNA (rRNA) using the primers 28sF3633 (5′-TACCGTGAGGGAAAGTTGAAA-3′) and 28sR4076 (5′-AGACTCCTTGGTCCGTGTTT-3′) as described in Rugman-Jones et al. (2010). A second rRNA locus, the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2), also was amplified using the primers 58SF (5′-GTGAACTGCAGGACACATGAAC-3′; Porter & Collins 1991) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′; White et al. 1990) as described in Morse et al. (2016). Finally, the “barcoding” region of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (COI) was amplified using LCO1490 (5′-GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3′) and HCO2198 (5′-TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA-3′; Folmer et al. 1994) as described in Rugman-Jones et al. (2012). All reactions were performed in 25 μL volumes on a Mastercycler® ep gradient S thermocycler (Eppendorf North America Inc., New York, New York, USA). Amplification was confirmed by gel electrophoresis, and PCR products were cleaned using a DNA Clean & Concentrator™-5 kit (Zymo Research Corporation, Irvine, California, USA). Amplicons were direct sequenced in both directions at the Institute for Integrative Genome Biology, University of California at Riverside. Direct sequencing was not possible for the COI amplicon of 4 specimens: PR17-247, PR17-248, PR17-249, and PR17-256. In each case, sequencing was facilitated by inserting the PCR product into a plasmid vector (pGEM-T Easy Vector System; Promega, Fitchburg, Wisconsin, USA). Plasmids were transformed in JM109 competent cells and insert-positive clones were identified by blue-white screening. At least 3 clones of the COI product were subsequently amplified and sequenced from each problematic specimen using M13 primers. A consensus of those clones was then taken for each problematic specimen to reduce the chance of incorporating PCRinduced errors into our analyses.

The parity of forward and reverse reads was checked using SEQUENCHER 4.9 (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA) and priming regions were removed manually in BioEdit version 7.0.5.3 (Hall 1999). The online tool, EMBOSS Transeq (Rice et al. 2000), was used to translate all protein coding COI sequences into their amino acid chains, confirming the absence of indels and pseudogenes in the final dataset. All sequences were deposited in GenBank® (Benson et al. 2008).

GENETIC ANALYSIS

Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequence variation was restricted to the 28SD2 and COI data. Sequences of 3 “outgroup” Encyrtinae, Encyrtus spp., and those of 2 additional Tetracneminae (Leptomastix epona (Walker) and Anagyrus sp. near pseudococci (Girault)), were retrieved from GenBank and included in the analyses (see Fig. 42 for accession numbers). Sequences of 28S and COI were aligned separately using MAFFT version 7.050 (Katoh & Standley 2013) utilizing the Q-INS-i algorithm with default settings, and subsequently concatenated. The resulting matrix contained 35 terminal taxa (including outgroups), each with 1,168 nucleotide positions (COI = 652 bp; 28SD2 = 516 bp). Phylogenetic reconstruction was performed by conducting a maximum likelihood (ML) analysis in RAxML (Stamatakis 2006), using the raxmlGUI v. 1.3 (Silvestro & Michalak 2012). The GTR + Γ model (identified as the best-fit using jModeltest 2.1.4; Darriba et al. 2012) was applied and the entire dataset was partitioned by locus and, for COI, also by third codon position. Node support was assessed from 1,000 rapid bootstrap replicates as implemented in raxmlGUI (according to Stamatakis et al. 2008). Phylogenetic inference from ITS2 is typically problematic due to large interspecific differences that make alignment of this region difficult and somewhat ambiguous. Therefore, ITS2 sequences, aligned using MAFFT, were simply compared “by eye” to determine if distinct groups of sequences were present.

ML analyses recovered 3 distinct clades/species (see Results) and genetic variation between and within those clades/species was subsequently estimated by calculating average pairwise uncorrected p-distances, based on COI, using MEGA6 (Tamura et al. 2013). All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair. The UPGMA method was used to infer a tree based on the p-distances, again in MEGA6. Branch support was assessed by bootstrapping with 1000 replicates.

Key to the New World species of Leptomastidea, both sexes

1 Flagellar segments with short setae; clava 3-segmented (Figs. 2, 6, 11, 18) females 2

1′.- Flagellar segments with very long setae; clava entire (Figs. 5, 14, 20) males 4

2 (1) Clava white, contrasting strikingly with dark brown to black funicle (Figs. 8, 11, 18) L. hypogeococci Triapitsyn, sp. n.

2′.- Clava light brown, more or less concolorous with funicle or at most slightly lighter (Figs. 2, 6) 3

3 (2) Scape with a conspicuous transverse black band in the middle (Fig. 6); fore wing as in Fig. 7 L. debachi Trjapitzin & Ruíz Cancino

3′.- Scape without a transverse black band in the middle, brown along dorsal margin (Fig. 2); fore wing as in Fig. 3 L. abnormis (Girault)

4 (1) Fore wing hyaline (Fig. 5, p. 13 in Triapitsyn 2015) L. debachi Trjapitzin & Ruíz Cancino

4′.- Fore wing with at least 2 brown bands (Figs. 5, 16, 21) 5

5 (4) Fore wing with proximal brown band (behind submarginal vein) transverse, more or less straight (Figs. 16, 21) -L. hypogeococci Triapitsyn, sp. n.

5′.- Fore wing with proximal brown band (behind submarginal vein) oblique (Fig. 5) L. abnormis (Girault)

Leptomastidea abnormis (Girault, 1915)
(Figs. 25)

  • Paraleptomastix abnormis Girault 1915: 184. Type locality: an unspecified locality in Sicily, Italy; apparently either [Contrada] Salina or Mondello in Palermo Province (Triapitsyn 2015). Lectotype female [USNM], examined (Triapitsyn 2015).

  • Leptomastidea abnormis (Girault): Noyes 2000: 137−138 (taxonomic history, list of synonyms, diagnosis, host associations, use in biocontrol, distribution, comments), 301–302, 347 (illustrations); Trjapitzin & Ruíz Cancino 2002: 31–32 (mentioned), 34 (illustration); Trjapitzin et al. 2004: 90–91 (catalog); Triapitsyn 2015: 10–11 (type information, lectotype designation, distribution), 13 (illustrations).

  • Leptomastidea antillicola Dozier 1937: 121–122. Type locality: coffee grove of the University of Puerto Rico Demonstration Farm, San Sebastián, Puerto Rico (USA). Subsequent references: De Santis 1979: 191 (catalog); Noyes 1980: 206 (list, a comment that it may be correctly placed in Leptomastidea); Noyes & Hayat 1994: 439 (list); Trjapitzin & Ruíz Cancino 2002: 31 (mentioned); Trjapitzin et al. 2004: 91 (catalog). Syn. n.

  • Type Material Examined. Holotype male of L. antillicola [USNM] on slide (Fig. 4) labeled: 1. “Leptomastidea antillicola Doz. ♂ Reared from Pseudo-coccus virgatus on leaves of “Guaba,” Inga inga at Univ. o [sic] P.R. Dem. Farm San Sebastián, P.R. May 12-1936, M. R. Smith”; 2. [red] “Leptomastidea antillicola Dozier Type ♂ Type No. 51762 U.S.N.M.”. The holotype (Fig. 5) is uncleared, complete, mounted dorsoventrally.

  • Measurements of the holotype (mm, as length or length:width). Body: 1.476; head: 0.351; mesosoma: 0.572; gaster: 0.646; genitalia: 0.209. Antenna: radicle: 0.061; scape: 0.215; pedicel: 0.057; F1: 0.172; F2: 0.133; F3: 0.16; F4: 0.136; F5: 0.139; F6: 0.133; clava: 0.227. Fore wing: 1.095:0.443; longest marginal seta: 0.03; hind wing: 0.707:0.14; longest marginal seta: 0.06.

  • Material Examined. ARGENTINA: San Juan, Departamento Albardón, Campo Afuera, 1 Feb 1997, S. V. Triapitsyn, K. M. Daane, D. González, P. Fidalgo, P. Schliserman (on table grapes in a private yard); emerged 2 Apr 1997 from Planococcus ficus (Signoret) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in University of California, Riverside Entomology Quarantine Laboratory (USA: California, Riverside Co., Riverside), K. C. McGiffen, S&R #97-03-06 [6 females, ~150 males, UCRC]. Tucumán, San Miguel de Tucumán, May 1976, M. Rose (from “Pseudococcus sp.” [rather likely a Planococcus sp.] on citrus) [4 females, 3 males, UCRC].

  • Comments. Leptomastidea abnormis is a widespread, common mealybug parasitoid that is probably native to the Mediterranean and has been introduced, accidentally or otherwise, to the New World and elsewhere (Noyes 2000; Trjapitzin & Ruíz Cancino 2000). The host of its junior synonym L. antillicola in Puerto Rico was Ferrisia virgata (Cockerell) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on foliage of guaba, Inga edulis [as Inga inga] (Dozier 1937); this mealybug is among the known hosts of L. abnormis, as listed by Noyes (2000).

  • Results and Discussion

    TAXONOMY

    Genus Leptomastidea García Mercet, 1916 (Encyrtidae)

  • Comments. All known members of Leptomastidea (i.e., 22 species that are recognized currently as valid) are mealybug parasitoids, and at least 1 species, L. abnormis (Girault), commonly is used in biological control programs for various mealybugs worldwide (Triapitsyn 2015). A new species of Leptomastidea was identified attacking Hypogeococcus spp. in the New World; its individuals were collected from Argentina, Barbados, Florida (USA), and Puerto Rico (USA) (Triapitsyn et al. 2014a), as well as more recently from Brazil. Three named species of Leptomastidea have been known to occur in the New World: the almost cosmopolitan L. abnormis (Triapitsyn 2015); L. antillicola Dozier (Dozier 1937), which is known from a single male from Puerto Rico and shown here to be a junior synonym of L. abnormis; and L. debachi Trjapitzin & Ruíz Cancino from Mexico (Trjapitzin & Ruíz Cancino 2002; Triapitsyn 2015).

  • Noyes (2000) defined Leptomastidea as an Old World genus, although he also mentioned that it is likely synonymous with the cosmopolitan genus Gyranusoidea Compere. Indeed, their limits are not well defined and the differences between them are minor and seem to be based on, at most, species group rather than generic level characters (Triapitsyn et al. 2014a; Triapitsyn 2015). However, a revision of this group of genera is well beyond the scope of this study, so the species keyed below are treated in Leptomastidea, even though 2 of them, L. debachi and the new species described herein, are without any doubt native to the New World.

  • Figs. 2–3.

    Leptomastidea abnormis female (San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina): 2, antenna; 3, fore wing.

    f02_411.jpg

    Leptomastidea debachi Trjapitzin & Ruíz Cancino, 2002
    (Figs. 6–7)

  • Leptomastidea debachi Trjapitzin & Ruíz Cancino 2002: 32–35. Type locality: Las Barracas (about 30 km E of Santiago, 23.4672°N, 109.4502°W, 50 masl), Baja California Sur, Mexico. Holotype female [USNM], examined (Triapitsyn 2015).

  • Leptomastidea debachi Trjapitzin & Ruíz Cancino: Triapitsyn 2015: 9–10 (type information, description of the male, taxonomic comments), 12–13 (illustrations).

  • Type Material Examined. Paratype female [UCRC] on point labeled: 1. “Mex. Baja Cal. Sur Las Barracas 18-V-1985″; 2. “Coll. P. DeBach Pan trap”; 3. “Leptomastidea ♀ Det. V. Trjapitzin May 1997″; 4. [red] “Paratypus Leptomastideadebachi Trjapitzin et Ruíz Cancino”; 5. “Praep. micr. 7M”; 6. [bar code] “UCRC_ENT 00408131″ (an antenna was detached from this specimen; it is mounted on a slide labeled: 1. “Leptomastidea debachi ♀ Trjapitzin et Ruíz Cancino México: Baja California Sur Las Barracas. Pan trap 18.V.1985 (Coll. P. DeBach) 7M Antena”; 2. [red] “Paratypus Leptomastideadebachi Trjapitzin et Ruíz Cancino”. Also 3 other female paratypes [UCRC] from the same locality, all collected by P. DeBach: 1 (lacking the head) with the same data as above except “Praep. micr. 6M” and “UCRC_ENT 00408128″ (a detached fore wing from this specimen is mounted on the slide number 6M with the identical label as above except “6M Ala ant.”); and 2 other females collected 5 May 1985 (UCRC_ENT 00408129) and 10 May 1985 (UCRC_ ENT 00408130).

  • Comments. Leptomastidea debachi is known only from the type locality in Baja California Sur, Mexico, and is native to the region (Trjapitzin & Ruíz Cancino 2002; Triapitsyn 2015). Triapitsyn (2015) also specified its palpal formula and noted that it might fit better in Gyranusoidea, as defined by Noyes (2000). However, otherwise it has most of the rather vague defining features of Leptomastidea, of which Gyranusoidea quite likely would be eventually recognized as a junior synonym, so its transfer to the latter genus would not make much sense.

  • Figs. 4–5.

    Leptomastidea abnormis male (holotype of L. antillicola): 4, slide; 5, habitus.

    f04_411.jpg

    Figs. 6–7.

    Leptomastidea debachi female (paratypes): 6, antenna; 7, fore wing.

    f06_411.jpg

    PRIMARY PARASITOIDS OF HYPOGEOCOCCUS SPP.

    Leptomastidea hypogeococci Triapitsyn, sp. n.
    (Figs. 821)

  • Leptomastidea sp.: Triapitsyn et al. 2014a: 173, 176–179 (distribution, host associations, taxonomic comments, brief diagnosis, illustrations); Noyes & Triapitsyn 2018: 20 (mentioned from Puerto Rico as a host of Prochiloneurus narendrani Noyes & Triapitsyn, a hyperparasitoid of Harrisia cactus mealybug).

  • Type Material. Holotype female [UCRC] on slide (Fig. 9) labeled: 1. “PUERTO RICO (USA): Cabo Rojo, 17.9794°N, 67.1700°W, vi.2012, A. Galindo, from Hypogeococcus sp. on cactus, Pilosocereus royenii, Berlese sample, code: CR-P6″; 2. “Mounted by V. V. Berezovskiy 2012 in Canada balsam”; 3. [magenta] “Leptomastidea hypogeococci S. Triapitsyn HOLOTYPE ♀”; 4. [bar code] “UCRC ENT 311025″. The holotype is in excellent condition, complete, dissected under 4 coverslips. Paratypes: BARBADOS, St. Philip Parish, Mangrove, 31 Mar 2011, W. McQuilkin (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Alternanthera sp.) [3 females, 3 males on points, UCRC]. PUERTO RICO (USA): Cabo Rojo, 17.9794°N, 67.1700°W: Jun 2012, A. Galindo-Cardona (from Hypogeococcus sp. on P. royenii, Berlese sample) [1 female on point, 1 male on point and 1 male on slide, UCRC]; date unknown, E. Vélez (from Hypogeococcus sp. on P. royenii, encapsulations) [6 females on points, UCRC]. Guánica, 17.9561°N, 66.8722°W: Jun 2012, A. Galindo-Cardona (from Hypogeococcus sp. on P. royenii, Berlese sample) [2 females, 1 male on points, UCRC]; date unknown, E. Vélez (from Hypogeococcus sp. on P. royenii, encapsulations) [4 females on points, UCRC]. San Juan, Río Piedras, Jardín Botánico Sur, 1193 Calle Guayacan, J. C. V. Rodrigues laboratory at the University of Puerto Rico, 10 Jul 2013, Z. Rivera-Ocasio, from colony on Hypogeococcus sp. on Portulaca oleracea (the mealybug host is of Guánica dry forest origin, Guánica, 17.9561°N, 66. 8722°W, Feb 2012, A. Roda, J. C. V. Rodrigues, on P. royenii); the parasitoid was originally from: Cabo Rojo, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Cabo Rojo National Wildlife Refuge, 17.9777°N, 67.1719°W, Apr 2012, E. Vélez, A. Galindo-Cardona, J. C. V. Rodrigues, on P. royenii [15 females, 10 males on points: BMNH (1 female, 1 male), METB (5 females, 3 males), UCRC (4 females, 3 males), USNM (5 females, 3 males); also 1 female on slide (molecular voucher PR17-243, UCRC ENT 311808) and 1 female in 95% ethanol in a freezer, UCRC]. USA, Florida, Palm Beach Co., Seacrest Scrub Natural Area, 19 Jun 2012, S. Weihman (from Hypogeococcus sp. mummies on Froelichia floridana (Amaranthaceae)) [7 females, 7 males on points, UCRC (3 females, 3 males), USNM (4 females, 4 males); also 1 female, 1 male on slides, UCRC].

  • Additional (Non-Type) Material Examined. ARGENTINA: Buenos Aires, Hurlingham, Gral. Simón Bolívar 1559, 34.5875°S, 58.6405°W, 14 masl, 12 Mar 2017, M. B. Aguirre (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Alternanthera paronychioides in FuEDEI lab colony) [1 female, UCRC, molecular voucher PR17-256, UCRC ENT 311809]. Salta, 25.3535°S, 64.9279°W, 762 masl, near intersection of Ruta 16 and Ruta 9, 18 Nov 2014, G. A. Logarzo, M. B. Aguirre (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Alternanthera pungens) [2 females, 1 male, UCRC, including molecular voucher PR17-254 (1 female, UCRC ENT 311810)]. BARBADOS: Christ Church Parish, Rockley, 8 Sep 2009, M. A. Ciomperlik (from Hypogeococcus sp.) [4 females, 6 males, BMNH]. [No locality indicated], 21 Apr 2009, Wendy (from Hypogeococcus sp.) [3 females, 3 males, BMNH]. BRAZIL, Rio de Janeiro: Quissamã, Praia Barra do Furado, 22.1063°S, 41.1502°W, 6 Dec 2016, M. B. Aguirre, S. D. Hight, M. D. Vitorino, G. A. Logarzo (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Amaranthaceae) [9 females, 3 males, UCRC, including molecular voucher PR17-249 (1 female, UCRC ENT 311811)]. São Pedro da Aldeia, 22.9087°S, 42.0366°W, 4 Dec 2016, G.A. Logarzo, M.D. Vitorino, S. D. Hight, M.B. Aguirre (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Cereus sp. (Cactaceae)) [1 female, UCRC]. Saquarema, 22.9567°S, 42.7522°W, 4 Dec 2016, M. B. Aguirre, G. A. Logarzo, M. D. Vitorino, S. D. Hight (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Cereus sp.) [3 females, 11 males, UCRC, including molecular vouchers PR17-247 (1 female, UCRC ENT 311812) and PR17-248 (1 male, UCRC ENT 311813)]. PUERTO RICO (USA): Cabo Rojo National Wildlife Refuge, 17.9787°N, 67.1708°W, 10 masl, host material collected 13 Feb 2017, parasitoids emerged 20 Feb 2017, Z. Rivera-Ocasio (from HCM, Hypogeococcus sp., on cactus) [6 females, 3 males, UCRC, including molecular voucher PR17-257 (1 female, UCRC ENT 311814)]. Mayagüez, 16 Jul 2009, M. A. Ciomperlik (from Hypogeococcus sp.) [5 females, 8 males, BMNH]. Mona Island, 12 Feb 2017, M. B. Aguirre, G. A. Logarzo (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Portulacaceae) [1 female, UCRC]. Vieques Island: Heliport Monte Pirata, 17 Feb 2017, G. A. Logarzo, M. B. Aguirre (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Portulacaceae) [1 male, UCRC]. Punta Conejos, Vieques National Wildlife Refuge, 18.1080°N, 65.3752°W, 1 masl, host material collected 30 Dec 2016, parasitoids emerged 21 Feb 2017, Z. Rivera-Ocasio (from HCM, Hypogeococcus sp., on cactus [8 females, 5 males, UCRC, including molecular vouchers PR17-250 (1 female, UCRC ENT 311815) and PR17-253 (1 male, UCRC ENT 311816)]. USA, Florida, Lee Co., 30 Oct 2009, M. A. Ciomperlik (on Portulaca sp.) [2 females, 3 males, BMNH].

  • Description. Female (holotype and paratypes). Body length 0.726 to 1.452 mm (air-dried and critical point-dried specimens). Body mostly orange-brown to brown except pronotum white laterally; scape yellowish except brown along dorsal margin, pedicel yellow or pale except slightly darker basally, flagellum dark brown to black, clava white; legs light brown except procoxa white.

  • Frontovertex, dorsal part of pronotum, mesoscutum, axilla, scutellum, lower part of mesopleuron, and lateral parts of propodeum with minute mesh-like sculpture. Pronotum, mesoscutum, axilla, and scutellum with short, dusky setae. Propodeum laterally with inconspicuous silvery-white pubescence.

  • Head (Fig. 10) a little wider than high. Vertex in frontal view convex, about 0.5× head width. Occipital margin sharp. Ocelli in an obtuse triangle, posterior ocellus very far away from eye margin. Scrobes short, not meeting above; intertorulal prominence weakly developed but nevertheless conspicuous. Mandible 2-dentate; labial palpus 2-segmented, maxillary palpus 3-segmented.

  • Antenna (Figs. 11, 18) inserted at lower eye margin level. Radicle about 0.25× total scape length, rest of scape slender, 5.2 to 5.3× as long as wide, a little wider in the middle closer to apex, with faint sculpture. Pedicel about as long as (or just slightly shorter than) F1. Funicle segments longer than wide; F1 the longest funicle segment, F2 to F6 more or less subequal in length, just slightly shorter than F1; F1 with 1 or 2, F2, F3, and F4 each with 2 or 3, F5 with 3, and F6 with 3 or 4 short mps. Clava 4.1 to 4.2× as long as wide and shorter than combined length of 3 preceding funicle segments; first claval segment with 3 or 4, second with 3 to 5 (and possibly with as many as 6), and third with 3 mps.

  • Mesosoma shorter than metasoma (Fig. 12). Pronotum narrow. Mesoscutum about 2× as wide as long. Scutellum a little wider than long, almost as long as mesoscutum; scutellar placoid sensilla in the middle of scutellum and close to each other.

  • Wings not abbreviated, fore wing extending far beyond apex of gaster. Fore wing (Figs. 13, 19) 3.0 to 3.1× as long as wide, unevenly pigmented, with 3 distinct, infuscate fasciae (all as transverse, straight cross-bands), second band (behind apex of venation) narrowly interrupted, third (subapical) band entire; postmarginal vein about as long as stigmal vein; longest marginal seta 0.09 to 0.1× maximum wing width. Hind wing (Fig. 13) more or less hyaline (at most slightly infuscate, more conspicuously so basally), 6.1 to 6.4× as long as wide; longest marginal seta 0.6 to 0.7× maximum wing width.

  • Mesobasitarsus shorter than combined length of following mesotarsal segments; mesotibial spur a little longer than or about as long as mesobasitarsus.

  • Ovipositor occupying 0.5 to 0.7× length of gaster, exserted markedly beyond gastral apex (by 0.22 to 0.3× own total length); ovipositor length:metatibia length ratio 1.2 to 1.3.

  • Measurements of the holotype (mm, as length or length:width). Mesosoma: 0.51; gaster: 0.645; ovipositor: 0.504. Antenna: radicle: 0.075; scape: 0.218; pedicel: 0.081; F1: 0.083; F2: 0.076; F3: 0.072; F4: 0.072; F5: 0.073; F6: 0.073; clava: 0.182. Fore wing: 0.996:0.326; longest marginal seta: 0.030; hind wing: 0.597:0.098; longest marginal seta: 0.062.

  • Male (paratypes). Body length 0.561 to 1.057 mm (air-dried and critical point-dried specimens). Body (Fig. 15) and appendages more or less uniformly brown except pedicel pale or light brown. Vertex in frontal view about 0.66× head width. Antenna (Figs. 14, 20) with scape minus radicle 4.2 to 4.5× as long as wide; flagellar segments with very long setae (much longer than each segment's width); funicle segments longer than wide, more or less subequal in length (F1 slightly shorter), short mps on F2 (1), F3 (0 or 1), F4 to F6 (1 or 2); clava entire, 5.8 to 6.1× as long as wide, a little wider than funicle segments, with 3 or 4 short mps. Mesosoma about as long as metasoma. Fore wing (Figs. 16, 21) 2.8 to 2.9× as long as wide, relatively less pigmented than in female, with 2 distinct infuscate fasciae and sometimes also with an indistinct, irregular, rather small and faint infuscate subapical spot closer to wing's anterior margin (Fig. 21); longest marginal seta 0.15 to 0.2× maximum wing width. Hind wing (Fig. 16) almost hyaline, 6.1 to 6.6× as long as wide; longest marginal seta 0.75 to 0.9× maximum wing width. Genitalia (Fig. 17) occupying 0.7 to 0.8× length of gaster.

  • Diagnosis. This is the only species of Leptomastidea in the New World where the clava is contrastingly white (Fig. 8), as mentioned in the key. It differs from L. abnormis in having a transverse, straight (almost perpendicular to the submarginal vein, Figs. 13, 19), rather than an oblique (Fig. 3), first (proximal) infuscate cross-band on the female fore wing behind the submarginal vein. Leptomastidea hypogeococci differs from L. debachi in the color patterns on the scape of the female antenna (compare Figs. 11, 18, and Fig. 6) and the configuration of infuscate fasciae on the fore wing (compare Figs. 13, 19, and Fig. 7). In the review of the world species of Leptomastidea by Trjapitzin (2009), L. hypogeococci keys to Couplet 30 together with the Afrotropical species L. jeanneli García Mercet, from which it differs in having a white clava of the female antenna and the first (proximal) transverse infuscate cross-band on the female fore wing straight, whereas in the female of L. jeanneli the clava is blackish-brown and the first infuscate band on the fore wing (behind the submarginal vein) is strongly oblique (Prinsloo 2001).

  • Distribution. Argentina (Catamarca, Salta, Tucumán), Barbados, Florida (USA), Puerto Rico (USA) (Triapitsyn et al. 2014a), and Brazil (Rio de Janeiro).

  • Hosts. Hypogeococcus pungens Granara de Willink s. str. and Hypogeococcus sp. in Argentina, Hypogeococcus spp. (including Harrisia cactus mealybug in Puerto Rico) in Barbados, Florida (USA), and Puerto Rico (Triapitsyn et al. 2014a), and Hypogeococcus sp. in Brazil.

  • Etymology. The species name refers to the generic name of its mealybug hosts, Hypogeococcus spp.

  • Comments. Initially this species had been thought to possibly belong to either L. antillicola or an undescribed taxon (J. S. Noyes, personal communication). A recent comparison of our specimens with the holotype of L. antillicola immediately made it clear that it is not conspecific; the latter is synonymized here under L. abnormis. Placement of this new species in Leptomastidea, as defined by Noyes (2000), is correct: L. hypogeococci has a 2-segmented labial palpus and 3 distinct, infuscate fasciae on the female fore wing; also its adults hold the wings erect over the back (Fig. 8), in the same manner as do adults of other species of this genus (Noyes 2000). There is no doubt whatsoever that L. hypogeococci is a native species because it parasitizes the mealybug Hypogeococcus sp. on the cactus P. royenii, both of which are native to the New World.

  • Fig. 8.

    Leptomastidea hypogeococci sp. n. female, photographed live (from colony, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA): habitus.

    f08_411.jpg

    Figs. 9–11.

    Leptomastidea hypogeococci sp. n. female (holotype): 9, slide; 10, head (frontal view); 11, antenna.

    f09_411.jpg

    Figs. 12–13.

    Leptomastidea hypogeococci sp. n. female (holotype): 12, mesosoma and metasoma; 13, fore and hind wings.

    f12_411.jpg

    Figs. 14–17.

    Leptomastidea hypogeococci sp. n. male (paratype, Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico, USA): 14, antenna; 15, body; 16, fore and hind wings; 17, genitalia.

    f14_411.jpg

    Figs. 18–21.

    Leptomastidea hypogeococci sp. n. (paratypes, Seacrest Scrub Natural Area, Palm Beach County, Florida, USA): 18, female antenna; 19, female fore wing; 20, male antenna; 21, male fore wing.

    f18_411.jpg

    Genus Anagyrus Howard, 1896 (Encyrtidae)

  • Comments. Members of Anagyrus in the Neotropical region can be recognized using the generic key in Noyes (1980). Later, Noyes (2000) provided a useful key to females of the genera in the subfamily Tetracneminae occurring in Costa Rica and a key to Costa Rican species of Anagyrus. More recently, Triapitsyn et al. (2014b) keyed the species in Argentina. Members of the genus are known to be mealybug parasitoids and are very diverse in the Neotropics; many species remain to be described. Anagyrus recognition is quite challenging, particularly because of common intraspecific variation in coloration of funicle segments of the female antenna, a character that is used extensively in taxonomic keys.

  • Anagyrus cachamai Triapitsyn, Logarzo & Aguirre, 2014

  • Anagyrus cachamai Triapitsyn, Logarzo & Aguirre in Triapitsyn et al. 2014b: 203 (key), 210–216. Type locality: El Portezuelo (28.4495°S, 65.6331°W, 653 masl), Catamarca, Argentina. Holotype female [MLPA], examined (Triapitsyn et al. 2014b).

  • Anagyrus cachamai Triapitsyn, Logarzo & Aguirre: Triapitsyn et al. 2014a: 173–174 (habitus images of both sexes).

  • Type Material Examined. Paratypes (on slides): ARGENTINA, Córdoba, Jesús María, 30.9690°S, 64.0690°W, 509 masl, 14 Feb 2014, G. A. Logarzo, M. B. Aguirre (from Hypogeococcus pungens on Alternanthera pungens) [1 female, 1 male, UCRC, molecular vouchers PR14-212 (UCRC ENT 311745) and PR14-213 (UCRC ENT 311746), respectively].

  • Material Examined. ARGENTINA: Mendoza, 32.7074°S, 68.8561°W, 816 masl, roadside of Ruta 52, collected 26 Mar 2017, M. B. Aguirre, G. A. Logarzo, S. D. Hight, S. V. Triapitsyn, emerged 28 Mar to 10 Apr 2017 (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Cereus ? aethiops) [21 females, 41 males, UCRC, including molecular voucher PR17-252 (1 female, UCRC ENT 311817)]. San Luis, San Luis, near intersection of Constitución & Lavalle, 33.2988°S, 66.3444°W, 719 masl, collected 28 Mar 2017: G. A. Logarzo, S. V. Triapitsyn, S. D. Hight, M. B. Aguirre (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Alternanthera pungens) [4 females, 4 males, UCRC]; S. D. Hight, S. V. Triapitsyn, G. A. Logarzo, M. B. Aguirre, emerged 10 Apr 2017 (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Portulaca sp.) [1 female, UCRC]. PARAGUAY: Boquerón, 22.2669°S, 60.4290°W, Fernheim Colony: 24 Sep 2016, S. D. Hight, G. A. Logarzo, M. B. Aguirre (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Harrisia bonplandii) [6 females, 5 males, UCRC, including molecular voucher PR17-246 (1 female, UCRC ENT 311818)]; 24 Sep 2016, S. D. Hight, G. A. Logarzo, M. B. Aguirre (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Cleistocactus baumannii (Cactaceae)) [14 females, 6 males, UCRC, including molecular voucher PR17-245 (1 female, UCRC ENT 311819)]. Presidente Hayes: 23.6383°S, 58.7014°W (Ruta 9, km 251): 23 Sep 2016, G. A. Logarzo, M. B. Aguirre, S. D. Hight (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Harrisia tortuosa) [3 males, UCRC]; 23 Sep 2016, G. A. Logarzo, S. D. Hight, M. B. Aguirre (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Harrisia bonplandii) [2 females, 13 males, UCRC]; 23 Sep 2016, S. D. Hight, M. B. Aguirre, G. A. Logarzo (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Monvillea spegazzinii (Cactaceae)) [2 females, 3 males, UCRC]. 23.2574°S, 59.1756°W (Ruta 9, km 318), 25 Sep 2016, S. D. Hight, M. B. Aguirre, G. A. Logarzo (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Harrisia bonplandii) [5 males, UCRC]. José Falcón, 25.2474°S, 57.7094°W, 22 Sep 2016, M. B. Aguirre, G. A. Logarzo, S. D. Hight (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Portulaca sp.) [6 females, 33 males, UCRC]. Near Colonia San Miguel, 24.3752°S, 58.1299°W, 21 Sep 2016, M. B. Aguirre, G. A. Logarzo, S. D. Hight (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Portulaca sp.) [2 females, 4 males, UCRC].

  • Distribution. Argentina (Catamarca, Córdoba, Salta, Tucumán) (Triapitsyn et al. 2014b) and Paraguay [new record].

  • Hosts. Hypogeococcus pungens Granara de Willink s. str. and Hypogeococcus spp. in Argentina (Triapitsyn et al. 2014b) and also Hypogeococcus spp. in Paraguay. On 29 Sep 2016 and 23 Jun 2017, this species was imported, under appropriate permits, into the quarantine laboratory at the Center for Excellence in Quarantine & Invasive Species, University of Puerto Rico, Jardín Botánico, Río Piedras, San Juan, Puerto Rico, and a colony was successfully established using the Puerto Rican Harrisia cactus mealybug as host.

  • Comments. See Triapitsyn et al. (2014b) for its description and illustrations, information on the distribution and host associations in Argentina, and brief notes on its biological traits. The digital images of the habitus of the dry-mounted, critical-point dried specimens for both sexes of this species were provided by Triapitsyn et al. (2014a).

  • Anagyrus lapachosus Triapitsyn, Aguirre & Logarzo, 2016

  • Anagyrus lapachosus Triapitsyn, Aguirre & Logarzo, 2016: 590–594. Type locality: Los Lapachos, 24.6019°S, 65.0812°W), Salta, Argentina. Holotype female [MLPA], examined (Triapitsyn et al. 2016).

  • Material Examined. PARAGUAY, Presidente Hayes, near Colonia San Miguel, 24.3752°S, 58.1299°W, 21 Sep 2016, M. B. Aguirre, G. A. Logarzo, S. D. Hight (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Portulaca sp.) [2 females, UCRC].

  • Distribution. Argentina (Salta) (Triapitsyn et al. 2016) and Paraguay [new record].

  • Hosts. Hypogeococcus sp. on Harrisia sp. in Argentina (Triapitsyn et al. 2016) and Hypogeococcus sp. on Portulaca sp. in Paraguay.

  • Comments. On 29 Sep 2016 and 23 Jun 2017, this species was imported, under appropriate permits, into the quarantine laboratory at the Center for Excellence in Quarantine & Invasive Species, University of Puerto Rico, Jardín Botánico, Río Piedras, San Juan, Puerto Rico, but its colony did not do well on initial trial using Harrisia cactus mealybug as host.

  • Anagyrus quilmes Triapitsyn, Logarzo & Aguirre, 2014

  • Anagyrus quilmes Triapitsyn, Logarzo & Aguirre in Triapitsyn et al. 2014b: 203 (key), 221, 223–228. Type locality: Vipos (near Choromoro, 26.4196°S, 65.3063°W, 788 masl), Tucumán, Argentina. Holotype female [MLPA], examined (Triapitsyn et al. 2014b).

  • Anagyrus quilmes Triapitsyn, Logarzo & Aguirre: Triapitsyn et al. 2014a: 173, 175–176 (habitus images of both sexes and color intraspecific variation of funicle segments of female antennae); Triapitsyn 2016: 28 (comparison with A. ciomperliki Triapitsyn).

  • Anagyrus ciomperliki Triapitsyn 2016: 27–31. Type locality: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Cabo Rojo National Wildlife Refuge, Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico (USA). Holotype female [UCRC], examined (Triapitsyn 2016). Syn. n.

  • Type Material Examined. Paratypes of A. quilmes (on slides): ARGENTINA, Catamarca, El Portezuelo, 28.4701°S, 65.6354°W, 635 masl, 22 Mar 2014, G. A. Logarzo, M. Guala (from Hypogeococcus pungens on Alternanthera pungens) [1 female, 1 male, UCRC, molecular vouchers PR14-210 (UCRC ENT 311743) and PR14-211 (UCRC ENT 311744), respectively].

  • Material Examined. ARGENTINA: Catamarca, El Portezuelo, 28.4701°S, 65.6354°W, 635 masl, 15 Feb 2014, G. A. Logarzo, M. B. Aguirre (from Hypogeococcus pungens on Alternanthera pungens) [1 female, 1 male, UCRC, molecular vouchers PR14-214 (UCRC ENT 311747) and PR14-215 (UCRC ENT 311748), respectively]. Chaco, between Margarita Belén and Colonia Benitez, 20 Nov 2015, G. A. Logarzo, M. B. Aguirre (from Pseudococcidae on crass, Crassula sp. (Crassulaceae)) [1 female, 10 males, UCRC]. Córdoba, near Mina Clavero, Vivero Córdoba, 31.7576°S, 64.9724°W, 1015 masl, collected 31 Mar 2017: M. B. Aguirre, S. D. Hight, G. A. Logarzo, S. V. Triapitsyn, emerged 1 to 10 Apr 2017 (from Hypogeococcus sp. on San Pedro cactus, Echinopsis pachanoi (Cactaceae)) [17 females, 3 males, UCRC, including molecular voucher PR17-244 (1 female, UCRC ENT 311820)]; M. B. Aguirre, S. D. Hight, G. A. Logarzo, S. V. Triapitsyn, emerged 17 to 24 Apr 2017 (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Echinopsis pachanoi) [7 females, 4 males, UCRC]; S. D. Hight, M. B. Aguirre, S. V. Triapitsyn, G. A. Logarzo, emerged 3 to 10 Apr 2017 (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Cleistocactus smaragdiflorus) [2 females, UCRC, including molecular voucher PR17-255 (1 female, UCRC ENT 311807)]; G. A. Logarzo, S. V. Triapitsyn, S. D. Hight, M. B. Aguirre, emerged 10 Apr 2017 (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Cereus sp.) [1 male, UCRC]; S. V. Triapitsyn, G. A. Logarzo, S. D. Hight, M. B. Aguirre, emerged 10 Apr 2017 (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Cereus ?forbesii) [1 female, 3 males, UCRC]. La Rioja, Anillaco (center of town), 8 Mar 2015, N. L. Jiménez, M. E. Guala, M. B. Aguirre (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Alternanthera pungens) [1 female, UCRC]. Salta, Río Piedras, 25.3549°S, 64.9020°W, 715 masl, 16 Feb 2014, M. B. Aguirre, S. V. Triapitsyn, G. A. Logarzo (from Hypogeococcus pungens on Alternanthera paronychioides) [1 male, UCRC, molecular voucher PR14-216 (UCRC ENT 311749)]. San Luis: San Luis, near intersection of Constitución & Lavalle, 33.2988°S, 66.3444°W, 719 masl, 28 Mar 2017, G. A. Logarzo, S. V. Triapitsyn, S. D. Hight, M. B. Aguirre, emerged 3 to 10 Apr 2017 (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Alternanthera pungens) [9 females, 4 males, UCRC, including molecular voucher PR17-251 (1 female, UCRC ENT 311806)]. Villa de Merlo, 7 Jun 2017, G. A. Logarzo (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Cereus sp.) [2 females, UCRC]. BRAZIL, Rio de Janeiro: Armação dos Búzios: APA Pau Hotel (Área de Proteção Ambiental): 5 Dec 2016, G. A. Logarzo, S. D. Hight, M. D. Vitorino, M. B. Aguirre (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Cereus sp. (“grandes”) [1 male, UCRC]; Praia das Caravelas: 22.8141°S, 41.9513°W, 5 Dec 2016, G. A. Logarzo, M. D. Vitorino, S. D. Hight, M. B. Aguirre (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Cereus sp.) [26 females, 10 males, UCRC, including molecular vouchers PR17-163 and PR17-164 (2 females, UCRC ENT 311805 and UCRC ENT 311804, respectively)]; 5 Dec 2016, G. A. Logarzo, M. D. Vitorino, S. D. Hight, M. B. Aguirre (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Cereus sp.) [3 females, UCRC]; Praia de Tucuns, 22.7999°S, 41.9303°W, 5 Dec 2016, S. D. Hight, M. D. Vitorino, G. A. Logarzo, M. B. Aguirre (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Cereus sp.) [14 females, 13 males, UCRC, including molecular vouchers PR17-161 and PR17-162 (2 females, UCRC ENT 311803 and UCRC ENT 311802, respectively)]. São Pedro da Aldeia, 22.9087°S, 42.0366°W, 4 Dec 2016, S. D. Hight, M. B. Aguirre, M. D. Vitorino, G.A. Logarzo (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Cereus sp.) [5 females, UCRC, including molecular voucher PR17-160 (1 female, UCRC ENT 311801)]. PARAGUAY, Presidente Hayes: José Falcón, 25.2474°S, 57.7094°W, 22 Sep 2016, M. B. Aguirre, G. A. Logarzo, S. D. Hight (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Portulaca sp.) [1 female, 7 males, UCRC, including molecular voucher PR17-167 (1 male, UCRC ENT 311800)]. Near Colonia San Miguel, 24.3752°S, 58.1299°W, 21 Sep 2016, M. B. Aguirre, G. A. Logarzo, S. D. Hight (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Portulaca sp.) [2 females, 1 male, UCRC]. PUERTO RICO (USA): Cabo Rojo National Wildlife Refuge, 17.9787°N, 67.1708°W, 10 masl, host material collected 13 Feb 2017, parasitoids emerged 20 Feb 2017, Z. Rivera-Ocasio (from Harrisia cactus mealybug, Hypogeococcus sp., on cactus) [5 females, 4 males, UCRC, including molecular vouchers PR17-165 and PR17-166 (2 females, UCRC ENT 311799 and UCRC ENT 311798, respectively)]. Vieques Island, Helioport Monte Pirata, 17 Feb 2017, M. B. Aguirre, G. A. Logarzo (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Achyranthes aspera (Amaranthaceae)) [1 female, 1 male, UCRC].

  • Distribution. Argentina (Catamarca, Salta, Tucumán (Triapitsyn et al. 2014b) as well as Chaco, Córdoba, and San Luis [new records]), Brazil (Rio de Janeiro) [new record], Puerto Rico (USA) (Triapitsyn 2016 [as A. ciomperliki]), and Paraguay (Presidente Hayes) [new record].

  • Hosts. Hypogeococcus pungens Granara de Willink s. str. and Hypogeococcus spp. in Argentina (Triapitsyn et al. 2014b), Hypogeococcus sp(p). in Brazil and Paraguay, and Hypogeococcus sp. (Harrisia cactus mealybug) in Puerto Rico (Triapitsyn 2016 [as A. ciomperliki]).

  • Comments. Triapitsyn (2016) described and illustrated A. ciomperliki based on the following differences in the proportions of female antennal segments: A. quilmes from Argentina having F1 shorter than pedicel but conspicuously longer than pedicel in A. ciomperliki. However, after that, many specimens of an Anagyrus sp. were reared from a Hypogeococcus sp. in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, that showed the intermediate state of this character, with F1 of the female antenna being either about as long as pedicel, or a little longer or shorter than pedicel. This intermediate character state cast doubt on the validity of A. ciomperliki as a taxon, so we decided to test its possible conspecificity with A. quilmes using molecular methods. The genetic analysis presented below under “Genetic Analysis” clearly indicates that they are indeed conspecific, hence the proposed synonymy of the former nominal species under the latter.

  • The female from Anillaco, La Rioja, Argentina, is only tentatively identified as A. quilmes, because the F4 is dark (see Triapitsyn 2016 for details).

  • Anagyrus spp.

  • Material Examined. ARGENTINA, Corrientes, Mercedes, 12 Mar 2017, G. A. Logarzo, F. McKay (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Alternanthera paronychioides) [2 males, UCRC]. PUERTO RICO (USA), Vieques Island, Heliport Monte Pirata, 17 Feb 2017, M. B. Aguirre, G. A. Logarzo (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Portulacaceae) [1 male, UCRC].

  • Stemmatosteres sp. (Encyrtidae)
    (Figs. 22–24)

  • Material Examined. ARGENTINA, Jujuy, Cuesta del Toquero, 22.1097°S, 65.7819°W, 3750 masl, 10 Feb 2015, M. B. Aguirre, G. A. Logarzo, E. R. Hasson (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Cactaceae) [4 males, UCRC].

  • Host. Hypogeococcus sp. on Cactaceae.

  • Comments. These interesting apterous specimens (Figs. 22–24), which were collected at high altitude, are likely not conspecific with any of the known members of the genus Stemmatosteres Timberlake from the New World although they might be somewhat similar to S. apterus Timberlake that is known from California (USA) and Uruguay (Noyes 2017), but their positive identification based solely on males is impossible. Although we are not sure about habit of this undetermined species, it is very likely a primary parasitoid.

  • SECONDARY PARASITOIDS (HYPERPARASITOIDS) OF HYPOGEOCOCCUS SPP.

    Chartocerus axillaris De Santis, 1973 (Signiphoridae)

  • Chartocerus axillaris De Santis 1973: 152–153: Type locality: Chacras de Coria, Mendoza, Argentina. Holotype female [MLPA], examined (Triapitsyn et al. 2014a).

  • Chartocerus axillaris De Santis: De Santis 1979: 253 (catalog).

  • Chartocerus ?axillaris De Santis: Triapitsyn 2014a: 176–178, 180–183 (illustrations).

  • Material Examined. ARGENTINA: Córdoba, near Mina Clavero, Vivero Córdoba, 31.7576°S, 64.9724°W, 1015 masl, collected 31 Mar 2017: S. V. Triapitsyn, S. D. Hight, G. A. Logarzo, M. B. Aguirre, emerged 3 Apr 2017 (from Hypogeococcus sp. on a large cactus, Cereus ?forbesii) [1 female, UCRC]; S. D. Hight, G. A. Logarzo, S. V. Triapitsyn, M. B. Aguirre (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Cleistocactus smaragdiflorus) [2 females, UCRC]; M. B. Aguirre, S. D. Hight, G. A. Logarzo, S. V. Triapitsyn, emerged 17 to 24 Apr 2017 (from Hypogeococcus sp. on San Pedro cactus, Echinopsis pachanoi) [1 female, UCRC]. Mendoza, 32.7074°S, 68.8561°W, 816 masl, roadside of Ruta 52, collected 26 Mar 2017, M. B. Aguirre, G. A. Logarzo, S. D. Hight, S. V. Triapitsyn, emerged 28 Mar to 10 Apr 2017 (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Cereus ?aethiops) [6 females, 3 males, UCRC]. Salta: Alemania, 25.6245°S, 65.6162°W, 21 Nov 2014, G. A. Logarzo, M. B. Aguirre, M. A. Saracho Bottero (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Cleistocactus sp.) [2 females, UCRC]. Los Lapachos, 24.6019°S, 65.0812°W, 20 Nov 2014, G. A. Logarzo, M. B. Aguirre, M. A. Saracho Bottero (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Harrisia sp.) [2 females, 2 males, UCRC].

  • Distribution. Argentina (Mendoza (De Santis 1973), Catamarca, Córdoba, Salta (Triapitsyn et al. 2014a)) and Paraguay (De Santis 1979).

  • Hosts. Hyperparasitoid of Hypogeococcus pungens s. str. and Hypogeococcus spp. (Triapitsyn et al. 2014a), and also of a Pseudococcus sp. (Pseudococcidae) on Solanum elaeagnifolium (Solanaceae) via the encyrtid primary parasitoid Anagyrus lopezi (De Santis) (De Santis 1973).

  • Comments. Although initial identifications of the specimens of this species from Hypogeococcus spp. in Argentina were tentative (Triapitsyn et al. 2014a), chances are quite high that they were correct. Such hyperparasitoids are not generally known to be particularly host specific, and later we reared Ch. axillaris in Mendoza; its type locality is in the same province.

  • Figs. 22–24.

    Stemmatosteres sp. male (Cuesta del Toquero, Jujuy, Argentina): 22, habitus; 23, head and antennae; 24, gaster.

    f22_411.jpg

    Cheiloneurus sp. near banksi (Howard) (Encyrtidae)
    (Figs. 2533)

  • Cheiloneurus n. sp. near amplicornis Gahan: Noyes & Triapitsyn 2018: 21 (mentioned as a hyperparasitoid from Barbados).

  • Material Examined. BARBADOS, Christ Church Parish, Rockley, 8 Sep 2009, M. A. Ciomperlik (from Hypogeococcus sp.) [4 females, 4 males, BMNH].

  • Host. Hyperparasitoid of the Harrisia cactus mealybug, Hypogeococcus sp., in Barbados via Leptomastidea hypogeococci [as Leptomastidea sp.] (Noyes & Triapitsyn 2018).

  • Comments. This species is quite likely not conspecific to any of the known species of Cheiloneurus Westwood from the New World although it is somewhat similar to Ch. banksi (Howard), of which Ch. amplicornis is a junior synonym (Trjapitzin 2002), per the identification labels of John S. Noyes (BMNH) and personal communication of Robert L. Zuparko (California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California, USA). However, we are reluctant to describe it as a new taxon because taxonomy of this genus is very difficult; its Neotropical fauna in particular is poorly known, and there is no identification key available. Its female antenna certainly does not fit any of those New World species of Cheiloneurus illustrated in Trjapitzin & Zuparko (2005) and Trjapitzin & Triapitsyn (2008). Illustrated here, to facilitate recognition of this interesting undescribed species, are its female (Figs. 25, 2730) and male (Figs. 26, 3133). Body length of the dry-mounted females is 0.96 to 1.47 mm, and that of males is 0.83 to 0.96 mm.

  • Figs. 25–26.

    Cheiloneurus sp. near banksi (Rockley, Christ Church Parish, Barbados): 25, habitus of female; 26, habitus of male.

    f25_411.jpg

    Figs. 27–33.

    Cheiloneurus sp. near banksi (Rockley, Christ Church Parish, Barbados): 27, female antenna; 28, female head (frontal view); 29, female mesosoma and metasoma; 30, female fore wing; 31, male antenna; 32, male fore wing; 33, male genitalia.

    f27_411.jpg

    Prochiloneurus argentinensis (De Santis, 1964) (Encyrtidae)
    (Figs. 34–35)

  • Achrysopophagus argentinensis De Santis 1964: 357–359. Type locality: San Javier, Tucumán, Argentina. Holotype female [MLPA], photographs examined (Noyes & Triapitsyn 2018).

  • Prochiloneurus sp.: Triapitsyn et al. 2014a: 178 (female from El Portezuelo, Catamarca, Argentina), 184 (illustration).

  • Prochiloneurus argentinensis (De Santis): Löhr et al. 1990: 423 (list of hyperparasitoids); Noyes & Triapitsyn 2018: 14–15 (mentioned), 18 (illustrations of the female from Catamarca, Argentina), 19 (illustrations of the holotype), 21 (mentioned), 22–25 (resurrection as a valid taxon from the previous synonymy under Prochiloneurus dactylopii (Howard), taxonomic history, redescription, diagnosis, distribution, host associations), 34 (mentioned).

  • Material Examined. ARGENTINA, Córdoba, near Mina Clavero, Vivero Córdoba, 31.7576°S, 64.9724°W, 1015 masl, collected 31 Mar 2017, M. B. Aguirre, S. D. Hight, G. A. Logarzo, S. V. Triapitsyn, emerged 17 to 24 Apr 2017 (from Hypogeococcus sp. on San Pedro cactus, Echinopsis pachanoi) [2 females, UCRC].

  • Other Material Examined. ARGENTINA, Misiones, Loreto, 14 Jul 1935, A. A. Ogloblin (“s/ larva de Pentilia egena Musl. [sic]”) [1 female, 2 males, MLPA].

  • Description. Male (previously unknown; from Loreto, Misiones, Argentina). Illustrated are its habitus (Fig. 34) and antennae (Fig. 35). Most of mesofemur (except basally) and metatibia dark.

  • Distribution. Argentina (Catamarca, Córdoba [new record], Misiones [new record] and Tucumán), Brazil, and Guyana (De Santis 1964; Löhr et al. 1990; De Santis & Fidalgo 1994; Triapitsyn et al. 2014a [as Prochiloneurus sp. in Catamarca]; Noyes & Triapitsyn 2018).

  • Hosts. A hyperparasitoid of Hypogeococcus pungens s. str. on Alternanthera pungens, probably via an Anagyrus sp. primary parasitoid of this mealybug in Catamarca, Argentina (Triapitsyn et al. 2014a [as Prochiloneurus sp.]; Noyes & Triapitsyn 2018), and also of Hypogeococcus sp. (likely via A. quilmes in Córdoba), as well as of Phenacoccus herreni Cox & Williams (Pseudococcidae) (Löhr et al. 1990; De Santis & Fidalgo 1994). The above record of this species from a larva of Pentilia egena Mulsant (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) is interesting but quite unusual, so we do not really know how trustworthy it is, even considering that A. A. Ogloblin was an experienced and very knowledgeable entomologist.

  • Prochiloneurus narendrani Noyes & Triapitsyn, 2018 (Encyrtidae)
    (Fig. 36)

  • Prochiloneurus narendrani Noyes & Triapitsyn 2018: 15–21. Type locality: Rockley, Christ Church, Barbados. Holotype female [BMNH], examined (Noyes & Triapitsyn 2018).

  • Material Examined. PUERTO RICO (USA): Mona Island, 12 Feb 2017, M. B. Aguirre, G. A. Logarzo (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Portulacaceae) [1 female, 1 male, UCRC]. Vieques Island, Heliport Monte Pirata, 17 Feb 2017, M. B. Aguirre, G. A. Logarzo (from Hypogeococcus sp. on Achyranthes aspera) [1 female, UCRC]

  • Description. Male (previously unknown; from Mona Island, Puerto Rico). Body length (of the dry-mounted, critical point dried specimen, Fig. 36) 0.76 mm. Body mostly grayish-brown except head and scutellum a little lighter and base of gaster light brown; antenna brownish, legs mostly light brown.

  • Distribution. Barbados and Puerto Rico (Mayagüez (Noyes & Triapitsyn 2018), Mona and Vieques Islands [new records]).

  • Host. Hyperparasitoid of the Harrisia cactus mealybug, Hypogeococcus sp., in Mayagüez, Puerto Rico, via Leptomastidea hypogeococci [as Leptomastidea sp.] (Noyes & Triapitsyn 2018).

  • TAXONOMIC NOTES ON OTHER NEOTROPICAL SPECIES OF ANAGYRUS

    Anagyrus tanystis De Santis, 1964
    (Figs. 37–41)

  • Anagyrus tanystis De Santis 1964: 61−63. Type locality: Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

  • Anagyrus tanystis De Santis: Triapitsyn et al. 2014b: 221 (key).

  • Type Material Examined. Holotype female [MACN] on slide (Fig. 37) labeled: 1. “CAPITAL FEDERAL Col: A. Zotta I-II/1913″; 2. [partially printed in red] “Anagyrus tanystis Det. De Santis HOLOTIPO MUSEO DE LA PLATA”; 3. [MACN type number] “A 89″.

  • Distribution. Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina (De Santis 1964).

  • Hosts. Unknown.

  • Comments. The holotype female of A. tanystis is dissected under 1 large square coverslip (Fig. 37); it lacks almost the entire flagellum of 1 of the antennae except for about a half of F1. Illustrated here, to facilitate its recognition, are its features (Figs. 38–41). This species is known only from a single specimen, which was not examined by Triapitsyn et al. (2014b) during preparation of the key to the described species of Anagyrus in Argentina.

  • GENETIC ANALYSIS

    DNA sequences of all 3 loci (28S, ITS2 and COI) were successfully obtained for 29 of 30 specimens. The only “shortfall” was the COI of a single specimen (PR17-254) from Argentina, which failed to amplify despite multiple attempts. Direct-sequencing of the COI locus also failed for a second specimen from Argentina (PR17-256) and 3 from Brazil (PR17-247 through 249) due to co-amplification of a NUMT (GenBank accessions MG748829-832). However, a valid COI sequence was obtained for each of these specimens by amplicon cloning.

    ML analyses of the concatenated 28S (MG731466-495) and COI (MG731496-524) sequences recovered 3 distinct clades (Fig. 42). These 3 clades corresponded to the species Leptomastidea hypogeococci, Anagyrus cachamai, and Anagyrus quilmes. Although discarded for the purpose of phylogenetic inference, sequences of ITS2 (MG731525-554) identified the same 3 clades.

    Leptomastidea hypogeococci - DNA sequences of the rRNA loci 28S and ITS2 were identical across specimens from Puerto Rico, Argentina, and Brazil, with the slight exception that the 28S sequence of 3 specimens (PR17-253 and PR17-257 from Puerto Rico, and PR17-254 from Argentina) harbored a heterozygous peak at position 140 (G or A, rather than just a G). The Puerto Rican specimens shared an identical COI haplotype, but on average this differed from the COI of Brazilian and Argentinian specimens (obtained from cloned amplicons) by 3.7% (average pairwise p-distance = 0.037). Variation in COI among Brazilian and Argentinian specimens was 10-fold lower (average p-distance = 0.003).

    Anagyrus cachamai - DNA sequences of 28S were more or less identical across specimens from Argentina and Paraguay, with just a separate single base insertion at positon 447 and 451 in specimens PR17-246 (Paraguay) and PR17-252 (Argentina), respectively. ITS2 was more variable, with 26 single nucleotide substitutions, insertions or deletions across 5 specimens and 695 aligned bases. In addition, 2 specimens (PR14-212 and PR14-213; MG731548-548) differed from the other 3 (MG731534-536) with a 29bp deletion (positions 148-176). These 2 specimens also shared a COI haplotype (MG731518-519) that differed from that of the other 3 specimens (MG731504-506) by over 5% (average pairwise p-distance = 0.054). Variation among the latter 3 specimens was 4-fold lower (average p-distance = 0.013).

    Figs. 34–36.

    Prochiloneurus spp. males (34–35, P. argentinensis, Loreto, Misiones, Argentina [photographs courtesy of D. A. Aquino]; 36, P. narendrani, Mona Island, Puerto Rico): 34, habitus; 35, antennae; 36, habitus.

    f34_411.jpg

    Anagyrus quilmes - DNA sequences of 28S and ITS2 were identical across all specimens from Puerto Rico, Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay. Eight COI haplotypes were detected, and there was a strong phylogeographic signal in the distribution of these haplotypes (Fig. 43). Pairwise divergence between 7 of these haplotypes was typically low (average pairwise p-distance = 0.005), but the remaining haplotype, harbored by PR14-214, differed from all others by over 5% (average pairwise pdistance = 0.054).

    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF THE HARRISIA CACTUS MEALYBUG IN PUERTO RICO

    The biological control program for Harrisia cactus mealybug in Puerto Rico was advanced with 2 shipments of 2 parasitoid species from South America to the quarantine facility at the University of Puerto Rico Center for Excellence in Quarantine & Invasive Species. The species transported to the quarantine facility were A. cachamai and A. lapachosus. Both parasitoid species accepted the Puerto Rico Harrisia cactus mealybug, and host range tests were initiated. Quarantine host range tests are expected to be completed by spring 2018, and a request for field release should be submitted before summer 2018. In addition, studies on natural enemy population dynamics and parasitoid biological parameters are planned for the 2 quarantined parasitoid colonies from South America, and a newly described parasitoid species already established and attacking the Harrisia cactus mealybug in Puerto Rico. This project is poised to successfully develop the only method that challenges the Harrisia cactus mealybug pest before we experience the devastation of cactus biodiversity in Puerto Rico.

    Figs. 37–41.

    Anagyrus tanystis female (holotype): 37, slide; 38, head (frontal view); 39, antennae; 40, mesosoma and metasoma; 41, fore wing.

    f37_411.jpg

    Fig. 42.

    Phylogenetic placement of Tetracneminae specimens inferred from ML analysis of concatenated sequences of 28S and COI. The analysis was conducted in RAxML and branch support, expressed as a percentage, was assessed with 1,000 rapid bootstrap replicates. Clade 1 = Leptomastidea hypogeococci; clade 2 = Anagyrus cachamai; clade 3 = Anagyrus quilmes. Encyrtus spp. (the outgroup) belong to the subfamily Encyrtinae.

    f42_411.jpg

    Fig. 43.

    Genetic variation in mitochondrial COI among specimens of 3 Tetracneminae (Encyrtidae) species inferred using the UPGMA method in MEGA6. The tree is drawn to scale, and branch lengths represent uncorrected p-distance. Branch support was assessed with 1,000 bootstrap replicates.

    f43_411.jpg

    Acknowledgments

    We thank John S. Noyes (BMNH) for valuable advice and collaboration on the initial identification of some species, Michael W. Gates (USNM) for the loan of the holotype of L. antillicola, Natalie Dale-Skey Pappillod (BMNH) for arranging a loan of specimens, Arturo Roig-Alsina (MACN) for access to the holotype of Anagyrus tanystis, Daniel A. Aquino (MLPA) for friendly assistance, Robert L. Zuparko (California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California, USA) for comments on the identity of Cheiloneurus sp., and Vladimir V. Berezovskiy (UCRC) for making excellent point and slide mounts. Zoelie Rivera-Ocasio (University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras, San Juan, Puerto Rico) and María Luisa Rivera-Vázquez (Puerto Rico Department of Agriculture, San Juan, Puerto Rico) collected specimens of A. ciomperliki and L. hypogeococci in Puerto Rico and kindly made them available to us. We are also grateful to many other collectors who contributed specimens for our survey. This study was supported by the USDA-APHIS Invasive Species Coordination Program in 2014 to 2016, and USDA-APHIS Farm Bill funding for Fiscal Year 2017.

    References Cited

    1.

    Aguirre MB, Diaz-Soltero H, Claps LE, Saracho Bottero A, Triapitsyn S, Hasson E, Logarzo GA. 2016. Studies on the biology of Hypogeococcus pungens (sensu stricto) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Argentina to aid the identification of the mealybug pest of Cactaceae in Puerto Rico. Journal of Insect Science 16: 58. Google Scholar

    2.

    Beltrà A, Soto A. 2011. New records of mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) from Spain. Phytoparasitica 39: 385–387. Google Scholar

    3.

    Ben-Dov Y. 1994. A Systematic Catalogue of the Mealybugs of the World (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with Data on Geographical Distribution, Host Plants, Biology and Economic Importance. Intercept Ltd., Andover, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

    4.

    Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Wheeler DL. 2008. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Research 36: D25–D30. Google Scholar

    5.

    Carrera-Martínez R, Aponte-Díaz L, Ruiz-Arocho J, Jenkins DA. 2015. Symptomatology of infestation by Hypogeococcus pungens: contrasts between host species. Haseltonia 21: 14–18. Google Scholar

    6.

    Claps LE, de Haro ME. 2001. Coccoidea (Insecta: Hemiptera) associated with Cactaceae in Argentina. Journal of the Professional Association for Cactus Development 4: 77–83. Google Scholar

    7.

    Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. 2012. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9: 772. Google Scholar

    8.

    De Santis L. 1964 (1963). Encírtidos de la República Argentina (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Anales de la Comisión de Investigación Científica de la Gobernación de la Provincia de Buenos Aires 4: 9–422. Google Scholar

    9.

    De Santis L. 1973. Nota sobre signifóridos de la República Argentina (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad Nacional de La Plata 49: 143–153. Google Scholar

    10.

    De Santis L. 1979. Catálogo de los Himenópteros Calcidoideos de América al Sur de los Estados Unidos. Publicación Especial, Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, La Plata, Argentina. Google Scholar

    11.

    De Santis L, Fidalgo P. 1994. Catálogo de los Himenópteros Calcidoideos de América al Sur de los Estados Unidos. Tercer suplemento (Insecta). Serie de la Academia Nacional de Agronomía y Veterinaria No. 13. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, La Plata, Argentina. Google Scholar

    12.

    Dozier HL. 1937. Descriptions of miscellaneous chalcidoid parasites from Puerto Rico. (Hymenoptera). Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico 21: 121–135. Google Scholar

    13.

    Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vriienhoek R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit 1 from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3: 294–299. Google Scholar

    14.

    German-Ramirez E, Kairo MTK, Stocks I, Haseeb M, Serra CA. 2014. New record of Hypogeococcus pungens (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in the Dominican Republic with comments on specific characters. Florida Entomologist 97: 320–321. Google Scholar

    15.

    Gibson GAP. 1997. Morphology and terminology, pp. 16–44 In Gibson GAP, Huber JT, Woolley JB [eds.], Annotated Keys to the Genera of Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Google Scholar

    16.

    Girault AA. 1915. Four new encyrtids from Sicily and the Philippines. Entomologist 48: 184–186. Google Scholar

    17.

    Granara de Willink MC. 1981. Nueva especie de Hypogeococcus Rau de Tucumán, República Argentina (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Neotropica 27: 61–65. Google Scholar

    18.

    Halbert SE. 1996. Entomology section. Triology 35: 2–4. Google Scholar

    19.

    Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98. Google Scholar

    20.

    Hodges A, Hodges G. 2009. Hypogeococcus pungens Granara de Willink (Insecta: Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), a mealybug. EENY459. IFAS Extension, University of Florida.  http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/IN/IN82700.pdf (last accessed 24 Oct 2017). Google Scholar

    21.

    Hosking J, McFadyen RE, Murray ND. 1988. Distribution and biological control of cactus species in eastern Australia. Plant Protection Quarantine 3: 115–123. Google Scholar

    22.

    Jenkins DA, Mizell III RF, Bloem SV, Whitmire S, Wiscovitch L, Zaleski C, Goenaga R. 2014. An analysis of arthropod interceptions by APHIS-PPQ and Customs and Border Protection in Puerto Rico. American Entomologist 60: 44–55. Google Scholar

    23.

    Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780. Google Scholar

    24.

    La Quay-Velázquez G, Ciomperlik M, Rodrigues JCV. 2015. Gall formation on the endangered cactus, Leptocereus quadricostatus caused by the invasive mealybug, Hypogeococcus pungens (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Caribbean Food Crops Society 51st Annual Meeting, Paramaribo, Suriname, 19–24 Jul 2015. Proceedings of the Caribbean Food Crops Society 51: 171–177. Google Scholar

    25.

    Löhr B, Varela AM, Santos B. 1990. Exploration for natural enemies of the cassava mealybug, Phenococcus manihoti (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae), in South America for the biological control of this introduced pest in Africa. Bulletin of Entomological Research 80: 417–425. Google Scholar

    26.

    Mazzeo G, Suma P, Russo A. 2008. Scale insects on succulent plants in Southern Italy, pp. 149–152 In Branco M, Franco JC, Hodgson CJ [eds.], Proceedings of the XI International Symposium on Scale Insect Studies, Oeiras, Portugal, 24–27 Sep 2007. ISA Press, Lisbon, Portugal. Google Scholar

    27.

    McFadyen RE. 2012. Harrisia (Eriocereus) martinii (Labour.) Britton - Harrisia cactus, Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Hummelink - sword pear, pp. 274–281 In Julien M, McFadyen R, Cullen J [eds.], Biological Control of Weeds in Australia. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia. Google Scholar

    28.

    McFadyen RE, Tomley AJ. 1978. Preliminary indications of success in the biological control of Harrisia cactus (Eriocereus martinii Lab.) in Queensland, pp. 108–112 In Proceedings of the First Conference of the Council of Australian Weed Science Societies, National Science Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Google Scholar

    29.

    McFadyen RE, Tomley AJ. 1981. Biological control of Harrisia cactus, Eriocereus martinii, in Queensland by the mealybug Hypogeococcus festerianus , pp. 589–594 In Del Fosse ES [ed.], Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. CSIRO, Canberra, Australia. Google Scholar

    30.

    Morse JG, Rugman-Jones PF, Woolley JB, Heraty JM, Triapitsyn SV, Hofshi R, Stouthamer R. 2016. Armored scales and their parasitoids on commercial avocados grown in California or imported from Mexico. Journal of Economic Entomology 109: 2032–2042. Google Scholar

    31.

    Noyes JS. 1980. A review of the genera of Neotropical Encyrtidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Entomology series 41: 107–253. Google Scholar

    32.

    Noyes JS. 2000. Encyrtidae of Costa Rica (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). 1. The subfamily Tetracneminae, parasitoids of mealybugs (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 62: 1–355. Google Scholar

    33.

    Noyes JS. 2017. Universal Chalcidoidea database. WWW publication. London: the Natural History Museum.  http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/projects/chalcidoids/index.html (last accessed 28 Jul 2017). Google Scholar

    34.

    Noyes JS, Hayat M. 1994. Oriental Mealybug Parasitoids of the Anagyrini (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) with a World Review of Encyrtidae used in Classical Biological Control and an Index of Encyrtid Parasitoids of Mealybugs (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

    35.

    Noyes JS, Triapitsyn SV. 2018 (2017). Taxonomic notes on some New World Prochiloneurus Silvestri (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) with description of a new species, a hyperparasitoid of Hypogeococcus sp. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Barbados and Puerto Rico, pp. 13–37 In Santhosh S, Nasser M, Sudheer K [eds.], Insect Diversity and Taxonomy. Prof. TC Narendran Trust for Animal Taxonomy, Calicut, Kerala, India. Google Scholar

    36.

    Paterson ID, Hoffmann JH, Klein H, Mathenge CW, Neser S, Zimmermann HG. 2011. Biological control of Cactaceae in South Africa. African Entomology 19: 230–246. Google Scholar

    37.

    Pérez Sandi y Cuen M, Zimmermann HG, Golubov J, Arias S. 2006. El piojo harinoso otro cactófago invasor amenaza nuestra biodiversidad desde Estados Unidos y las Islas del Caribe. CONABIO, Biodiversitas 66: 10–11. Google Scholar

    38.

    Porter CH, Collins FH. 1991. Species-diagnostic differences in a ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer from the sibling species Anopheles freeborni and Anopheles hermsi (Diptera: Culicidae). American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 45: 271–279. Google Scholar

    39.

    Prinsloo GL. 2001. The Afrotropical species of Leptomastidea Mercet (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), parasitoids of mealybugs. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 10: 145–162. Google Scholar

    40.

    Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A. 2000. EMBOSS: The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends in Genetics 16: 276–277. Google Scholar

    41.

    Rugman-Jones PF, Hoddle MS, Amrich R, Heraty JM, Stouthamer-Ingel CE, Stouthamer R. 2012. Phylogeographic structure, outbreeding depression, and reluctant virgin oviposition in the bean thrips, Caliothrips fasciatus (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), in California. Bulletin of Entomological Research 102: 698–709. Google Scholar

    42.

    Rugman-Jones PF, Hoddle MS, Stouthamer R. 2010. Nuclear-mitochondrial barcoding exposes the global pest western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) as two sympatric cryptic species in its native California. Journal of Economic Entomology 103: 877–886. Google Scholar

    43.

    Segarra-Carmona AE, Ramírez-Lluch A, Cabrera-Asencio I, Jiménez-López AN. 2010. First report of a new invasive mealybug, the Harrisia cactus mealybug Hypogeococcus pungens (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). The Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico 94: 183–187. Google Scholar

    44.

    Silvestro D, Michalak I. 2012. raxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for RAxML. Organisms Diversity and Evolution 12: 335–337. Google Scholar

    45.

    Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688–2690. Google Scholar

    46.

    Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Systematic Biology 57: 758–771. Google Scholar

    47.

    Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 2725–2729. Google Scholar

    48.

    Triapitsyn SV. 2015. Description of the male of Leptomastidea debachi Trjapizin and Ruíz Cancino from Baja California Sur, Mexico, with notes on L. abnormis (Girault) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Dugesiana 22: 9–13. Google Scholar

    49.

    Triapitsyn SV. 2016. A new species of Anagyrus Howard (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) from Puerto Rico (USA), parasitoid of Harrisia cactus mealybug, Hypogeococcus sp. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), on Pilosocereus royenii (Cactaceae). Dugesiana 23: 27–31. Google Scholar

    50.

    Triapitsyn SV, Aguirre MB, Logarzo GA. 2016. A new Anagyrus (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) from Argentina, parasitoid of Hypogeococcus sp. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on Harrisia pomanensis (Cactaceae). Zootaxa 4114: 590–594. Google Scholar

    51.

    Triapitsyn SV, Aguirre MB, Logarzo GA, Dal Molin A. 2014a. Taxonomic notes on primary and secondary parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae and Signiphoridae) of Hypogeococcus spp. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Argentina. Acta Zoológica Lilloana 58: 171–186. Google Scholar

    52.

    Triapitsyn SV, Logarzo GA, Aguirre MB, Aquino DA. 2014b. Two new species of Anagyrus (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) from Argentina, parasitoids of Hypogeococcus spp. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), with taxonomic notes on some congeneric taxa. Zootaxa 3861: 201–230. Google Scholar

    53.

    Trjapitzin VA. 2002. Notes on the genus Cheiloneurus Westwood, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) with redescription of Ch. marilandia (Girault, 1917) from USA. Russian Entomological Journal 11: 301–303 Google Scholar

    54.

    Trjapitzin VA. 2009. [Review of species of the genus Leptomastidea Mercet, 1916 (Hymenoptera, Encyrtidae) of the world, with description of a new species from Montenegro and with separation of a new genus from Turkmenia]. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 88: 164–176. [In Russian. English translation: Trjapitzin VA. 2009. Review of the species of the genus Leptomastidea Mercet, 1916 (Hymenoptera, Encyrtidae) of the world, with description of a new species from Montenegro and with separation of a new genus from Turkmenia. Entomological Review 89: 203–212.] Google Scholar

    55.

    Trjapitzin VA, Bennett FD, Ruíz-Cancino E, Coronado-Blanco JM. 2004. Annotated Check-List of Encyrtids (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Encyrtidae) of Central America, the West Indies and Bermuda. Universidad Autónoma de Tamualipas, Ciudad Victoria, Mexico. Google Scholar

    56.

    Trjapitzin VA, Ruíz Cancino E. 2000. Encírtidos (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) de Importancia Agrícola en México. Serie Publicaciones Científicas, Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo Agropecuario, Forestal y de la Fauna, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas (Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, Mexico) No. 2. Google Scholar

    57.

    Trjapitzin VA, Ruíz Cancino E. 2002 (2001). Leptomastidea debachi (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), una nueva especie de Baja California Sur, México. BIOTAM n.s. 12: 31–36. Google Scholar

    58.

    Trjapitzin VA, Triapitsyn SV. 2008 (2007). New species of Cheiloneurus Westwood, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) from Alaska (USA), Mexico, and Cuba. Russian Entomological Journal 16: 465–473. Google Scholar

    59.

    Trjapitzin VA, Zuparko RL. 2005 (2004). A synopsis of genus Cheiloneurus Westwood, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Encyrtidae) of the New World. Russian Entomological Journal 13: 257–266. Google Scholar

    60.

    Truett GE, Heeger P, Mynatt RL, Truett AA, Walker JA, Warman ML. 2000. Preparation of PCR Quality Mouse Genomic DNA with Hot Sodium Hydroxide and Tris (HotSHOT). BioTechniques 29: 52–54. Google Scholar

    61.

    White GG, Donnelly GP. 1993. A review of Queensland Department of Lands Research on biological control of weeds, pp. 28–32 In Proceedings of the 10th Australian Weeds Conference and 14th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 6–10 Sep 1993. Volume 2. Weed Society of Queensland. Google Scholar

    62.

    White TJ, Burns T, Lee S, Taylor TJ. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics, pp. 315–322 In Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ [eds.], PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA. Google Scholar

    63.

    Zimmermann HG, Pérez Sandi y Cuen M. 2010. La amenaza de los piojos harinosos Hypogeococcus pungens e Hypogeococcus festerianus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) a las cactáceas mexicanas y del Caribe. Cactáceas y Suculentas Mexicanas 55: 4–17. Google Scholar

    64.

    Zimmermann HG, Pérez Sandi [y] Cuen M, Mandujano MC, Golubov J. 2010. The South American mealybug that threatens North American cacti. Cactus and Succulent Journal 82: 105–107. Google Scholar
    Serguei V. Triapitsyn, María B. Aguirre, Guillermo A. Logarzo, Stephen D. Hight, Matthew A. Ciomperlik, Paul F. Rugman-Jones, and Jose C. Verle Rodrigues "Complex of Primary and Secondary Parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae and Signiphoridae) of Hypogeococcus spp. Mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in the New World," Florida Entomologist 101(3), 411-434, (1 September 2018). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.101.0320
    Published: 1 September 2018
    KEYWORDS
    Anagyrus
    biological control
    Chalcidoidea
    Control biológico
    especie nueva
    Leptomastidea
    new species
    Back to Top