Translator Disclaimer
31 May 2021 Pests of Florida Hops: Preliminary Observations
Author Affiliations +

Surveys of arthropods associated with hops at the University of Florida's Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, Wimauma, Florida, USA, from 2016 to 2020 reveal that spider mites are the primary pest of the crop. Lepidoptera and lace bugs also were observed causing occasional damage to the crop. Whiteflies and thrips have been observed on the crop in low numbers. The tall (5.5 m) canopy of the hops trellis creates a challenge to applying insecticides with adequate coverage. Sampling data indicate that spider mite densities tend to be higher in the upper canopy than at ground level. Efforts to control spider mites with releases of the commercially available predator Phytoseiulus persimilis showed promise. Naturally occurring spider mite predators observed on hops at Gulf Coast Research and Education Center include Stethorus sp., Neoseiulus sp., Orius sp., and trash bugs.

The hop plant, Humulus lupulus L. (Cannabaceae), produces flowers, also referred to as cones, which are used to provide flavor and aroma to beer. Since 2016, hops has been studied at the University of Florida's Gulf Coast Research and Education Center in Wimauma, Florida, USA, as an alternative crop for Florida. In Florida, hops were not grown commercially before 2016, but it is estimated that hop production has expanded to nearly 16 ha in the state (Smith 2018). Hops typically is grown in temperate climates, and prior to 2016 there was little information available regarding the pest complex likely to affect hops in Florida. From 2016 through 2020, the Vegetable Entomology program at Gulf Coast Research and Education Center scouted hops research plots, submitted arthropods associated with hops for identification, and provided recommendations for chemical and biological control of pests including two-spotted spider mites, Tetranychus urticae (Koch) (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae), on hops. The objectives of these efforts were to identify primary pests of Florida hops and beneficial arthropods associated with them, and to lay the foundation for a predator-based approach to managing two-spotted spider mites on hops. Scouting and pest management guidance also has been offered to a commercial hopyard in Brooksville, Florida, USA, since 2017.

The hopyard at Gulf Coast Research and Education Center consists of eight 72 m rows of hops with hills spaced 0.9 m apart within the row and 2 plants per hill (80 hills per row). The primary variety grown at Gulf Coast Research and Education Center is ‘Cascade.’ The space between rows is 4.6 m, resulting in 2,392 hills per ha. Plants are grown on 5.5 m trellises. Scouting consisted of visual examination of 5 randomly selected plants per row. Pest and beneficial arthropods were collected and brought to the Vegetable Entomology lab for curation and identification. Some specimens were submitted to the Division of Plant Industry, Gainesville, Florida, USA, for identification by specialists. A 10× hand lens was used during scouting to examine the underside of hops leaves for the presence of spider mites and mite predators. Insecticides and miticides were applied occasionally to the hops for management of caterpillars and spider mites during the 2016 to 2018 growing seasons. Insecticides were applied in 935 L of water per ha (100 gpa) using a Pak Blast Sprayer (Rears Manufacturing Company, Coburg, Oregon, USA) pulled by a John Deere 5310 tractor (John Deere, Moline, Illinois, USA). On 4 Jun 2018, water sensitive cards (TeeJet, Louisville, Kentucky, USA) were placed at 3 levels (1, 3, and 5 m above the ground) every 10 m per row prior to application of miticides at Gulf Coast Research and Education Center to evaluate the percentage of spray coverage. In total, 192 cards were deployed.

During the fall of 2019, releases of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) were evaluated for management of spider mites. About 5 P. persimilis were applied to the base and the upper canopy of each plant on 10 Sep, which was 69 d after bines were cut to initiate growth for the fall season. About 5 additional P. persimilis were applied to the base of each plant on 17 Sep. Spider mite sampling was expanded that season to include the upper canopy of the hops. Five leaves from 1.5 m above the ground and 5 leaves from 5 m above the ground were collected from 5 randomly selected plants per row. A Genie S40 Boom Lift (Terex Corporation, Redmond, Washington, USA) was used to scout and collect leaves from the upper canopy of the hops. Leaf samples were taken to the laboratory where motile (immature and adult) and egg stage spider mites were counted using a mite brushing machine (BioQuip, Rancho Dominguez, California, USA). The effect of stratum (1.5 m or 5 m above ground level), sample date, and the interaction of the 2 factors on number of spider mite eggs and motiles was assessed by analysis of variance (PROC GLIMMIX; SAS 2015). Data were log transformed prior to analysis.

Table 1 lists the arthropods identified from hops at Gulf Coast Research and Education Center and Brooksville and maintained in a reference collection. Spider mites are the only pest to establish each season on hops at Gulf Coast Research and Education Center. Testimonial evidence from Florida hops growers attending hops field d at Gulf Coast Research and Education Center confirm that spider mites are a recurrent pest of the crop in other parts of the state. Globally, spider mites are considered a primary pest of hops (Neve 1991). Research suggests high densities (up to 90 per leaf) of spider mites may be tolerated without impacting cone production or quality (Weihrauch 2005). Applications of miticides to control spider mites at Gulf Coast Research and Education Center with the Pak Blast sprayer did not result in consistent or long-term reduction in spider mite populations. Water sensitive cards deployed 4 Jun 2018 indicate a mean of 44% insecticide coverage at 1.5 m, 33% coverage at 3 m, and only 18% coverage 5 m above ground level.

Table 1.

Some arthropods associated with hops (Humulus lupulus) at Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, Wimauma, Florida, USA, and dates of collection of voucher specimens, 2016 to 2020.


Sample date and stratum had a significant effect on number of spider mite eggs (date: F6,266 = 43.49; P < 0.0001; stratum: F1,266 = 21.59; P < 0.0001) and motiles (date: F6,266 = 12.15; P < 0.0001; stratum: F1,266 = 26.58; P < 0.0001) during fall 2019. Motiles tended to be 7 to 10 times more abundant at 5 m than at 1.5 m (Fig. 1). Eggs also tended to be higher in the upper canopy than at ground level, but there was considerable variability in the egg samples, and the upper canopy was only statistically higher than the lower canopy on 10 Sep (Fig. 1). The interaction between sample date and stratum was significant both for eggs (F6,266 = 2.78; P = 0.01) and motiles (F6,266 = 2.18; P = 0.045). Numbers tended to be higher in the upper stratum, however, there were wk in which differences between the upper and lower canopy were not significant.

Fig. 1.

Mean number (± SEM) of spider mite eggs and motiles collected from 1.5 and 5 m above the ground from hops (cv. ‘Cascade'), fall 2019, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, Wimauma, Florida, USA. About 10 P. persimilis per plant were released 10 Sep (5 at 1.5 m and 5 at 5 m) and about 5 P. persimilis per plant were released in the lower canopy 17 Sep. An asterisk (*) indicates that numbers of spider mite eggs at 1.5 and 5 m were statistically different using Tukey's mean separation test (p < 0.05); a cross (+) indicates that numbers of spider mite motiles at 1.5 and 5 m were statistically different.


Prior to the release of approximately 5 P. persimilis in the upper and lower canopy of each plant on 10 Sep 2019, the mean number of motiles (± SEM) was 7.6 (± 2.6) at 1.5 m, and 69.1 (± 19.9) at 5 m (Fig. 1). The following wk (17 Sep), when an additional release of about 5 P. persimilis was made at ground level, the means were 4.6 (± 1.3) at 1.5 m, and 28.8 (± 7.9) at 5 m. Motile numbers peaked 24 Sep at 10.3 (± 5.2) and 85.1 (± 32.9) in the upper and lower stratum, respectively, after which spider mite numbers declined each wk until they were not detected on 15 Oct (Fig. 1). It was not feasible to leave part of the hopyard untreated; therefore, no data are available showing how spider mite populations would have behaved in the absence of P. persimilis releases. However, P. persimilis was observed consistently on leaves with spider mites, and we are confident that the releases contributed to the decline of spider mite populations. In addition, naturally occurring spider mite predators were observed, including Stethorus sp. (Coleoptera: Coccinelidae), Neoseiulus sp. (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae), Orius sp. (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), and trash bugs (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae).

Research on management of hops pests at Gulf Coast Research and Education Center indicates that fogging insecticide application equipment commonly used in citrus, such as the Pak Blast sprayer, may provide insufficient coverage for effective spider mite management. Data collected in the fall of 2019 suggests that spider mite densities tend to be much higher in the upper canopy than the lower canopy, indicating that pest densities at ground level may not be representative of densities throughout the crop. Evaluations of releases of P. persimilis show great promise for management of spider mites in Florida hops. In the fall of 2019 and the spring of 2020, when P. persimilis was released for spider mite control and no insecticides were applied for any pest, other pests did not establish in substantial numbers. Cotton lace bug and caterpillars were problematic only in previous years when insecticides were applied. Caterpillar larvae and egg masses that were collected in 2019 and 2020 for identification frequently were parasitized by braconids or eulophids. Katydid (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) eggs collected from hops leaves 24 Oct 2019 produced the egg parasitoid Anastus mirabilis (Walsh & Riley) (Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae) but no katydids. Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) nymphs were observed occasionally on hops leaves at low densities but usually were parasitized. Various thrips species were observed occasionally in low numbers on foliage and cones, usually associated with Orius sp. We speculate that the tall canopy of the hopyard, which provides full sun part of the d, but also shade and conserved moisture, creates a stable habitat for a variety of herbivorous, predatory, and parasitic arthropods, keeping pests (with the exception of spider mites) at low densities in the absence of insecticide applications.

Laurie Chambers assisted with this research, which was funded with support from the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Specialty Crop Block Grant program. We are grateful to BioBee Biological Systems Ltd for donations of P. persimilis.

References Cited


Neve RA. 1991. Hops. Chapman and Hall, London, United Kingdom. Google Scholar


SAS Institute Inc. 2015. SAS® Enterprise Guide® v. 7.1 SAS® Deployment Wizard and SAS® deployment manager 9.4: user's guide. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA. Google Scholar


Smith RM. 2018. Double harvest potential makes Florida hops twice as profitable. Growing Produce 18 Sept. (last accessed 16 Dec 2020). Google Scholar


Weihrauch F. 2005. Evaluation of a damage threshold for two-spotted spider mites, Tetranychus urticae, in hop culture. Annals of Applied Biology 146: 501–509. Google Scholar
Hugh Smith, Megan Hennessey, Amanda Furuya, Esnai Munthali, Bruno Rossitto De Marchi, and Shinsuke Agehara "Pests of Florida Hops: Preliminary Observations," Florida Entomologist 104(1), 51-53, (31 May 2021).
Published: 31 May 2021

Back to Top