Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
6 January 2023 A Portable Chamber for Experimental Observations of Bactericera Cockerelli on Plant Seedlings and Leaves
Carolina Delgado-Luna, Álvaro Romero-Castillo, Ernesto Cerna-Chávez, Sergio R. Sánchez-Peña
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We describe a portable, economical plastic chamber for observations on development and reproduction of potato-tomato psyllid, Bactericera cockerelli for up to a few wk on plant material under controlled conditions. It can be used for other insects as well.

Se describe una cámara de plástico portátil y económica para observaciones durante semanas del desarrollo y reproducción de el psílido de la papa y tomate, Bactericera cockerelli en material vegetal bajo condiciones controladas. Esta cámara también se puede utilizar para otros insectos.

Bactericera cockerelli Šulc (Hemiptera: Triozidae), the potato-tomato psyllid, is the pest of most concern in solanaceous crops, as a vector of Liberibacter (Hyphomicrobiales: Rhizobiaceae), causal agents of severe diseases. Laboratory research on biology, behavior, and physiology of B. cockerelli is required (Reyes-Corral et al. 2021). Experimental methods with live insects should be adaptable, simple, and repeatable. Insect bioassays often are performed on complete plants (Liu & Trumble 2005; Echegaray et al. 2016). On detached leaves (Lehman 1930; Wagan et al. 2018), observations can be done for only a few d due to leaf decay. With the clip chamber technique (insects confined in small chambers attached to leaves on whole plants) observations may be difficult because manipulation is cumbersome (Liu & Trumble 2005; Echegaray et al. 2016; Szczepaniec et al. 2019).

A portable chamber was produced to facilitate laboratory observation of processes like oviposition, hatching, and development of B. cockerelli, and the effect of variables like plant material (leaflets or rootless seedlings) and substrate (peat moss or water).

Fig. 1.

Portable chamber. Bottoms A and B of chamber, with holes (a) and (b); cryovial cap (C) positioned in hole b; cap C with perforation (c); cryovial tube (D). Two chambers complete with plants, with water (E) or substrate (F) and modeling clay (yellow arrows) sealing the plant in tube. Adults (G) and eggs (H, I) (black and white arrows, respectively) of Bactericera cockerelli, and tomato leaflet inside chamber.

img-z1-7_323.jpg

This chamber was based on the design of author Romero-Castillo. On Figure 1, one can see that it is composed of: two bottoms (A and B) of transparent polyethylene Petri dishes (100 mm diam × 15 mm deep); a 5 mL cryovial tube (D) with screw cap (C) (Corning PD1013, Corning, New York, USA); organza cloth; Parafilm® (Bemis, Mexico City, Mexico), silicone bars (Modatelas, Saltillo, Mexico); and non-toxic modeling clay (Baco, Mexico City, Mexico). Each bottom (A and B) has a 1.5 cm diam hole (a) for ventilation, covered with organza fabric sealed with silicone. The bottom A has a lateral hole of diameter equal to the tube cap (b). The cap (C) of this tube has a hole (c) 0.7 mm in diam. Assemblage: the cap (C) of the cryovial tube was inserted in hole (b) of bottom A, and the contact of cap and bottom sealed with clay. The tube has water or substrate added, then covered with the perforated cap. Terminal leaflets (6–7 cm) of tomato leaves or seedlings (with cut root) were used. The petiole or stem was inserted in hole (c) of the cap, and the contact of plant and cap was sealed with clay to prevent leaks and insect escape. Bottoms A and B were placed together and the union sealed with Parafilm®, forming the chamber (Fig. 1).

Table 1.

Mean ± SE of Bactericera cockerelli oviposition and egg hatching.

img-z2-4_323.gif

There were 2 sets of observations on B. cockerelli. The first observations used 10 replicates (chambers) with tomato leaflets and the petiole in water. To ensure the use of live, vigorous leaflets, these were incubated in chambers for 24 h before starting observations. After this acclimatization period, adult insects (2 males and 3 females) were introduced per chamber, which was quickly assembled to prevent insect escape; the union of bottoms A and B was sealed with Parafilm®. After 48 h adults were removed, and the number of eggs, and eventually nymphs and adults, were recorded over several d. Leaflets were changed twice (14 and 21 d after experiment setup) since nymphs (about 30 per leaflet) caused rapid deterioration of plant material.

In the second set of observations, on tomato (Rio Grande variety), we compared the effect of 3 treatments on oviposition: leaflets in water, plants in water, and plants in moistened substrate (Premier® sphagnum peat moss; Premier, Quakertown, Pennsylvania, USA). Plants were first acclimatized for 24 h as before. Ten B. cockerelli adults (5 females and 5 males) were introduced per chamber as described with 10 replicates (chambers) per treatment. Adults were confined in the chamber for 48 h, then removed. After 5 d, we recorded the number of unhatched and hatched eggs. Data (second observations) were processed by analysis of variance and means separation (Tukey's HSD) in the statistical package InfoStat (Di Rienzo et al. 2017).

In the first observations, females oviposited a mean of 15.3 eggs per leaflet. In the second observations, means were 13.3 eggs on leaflets in water, 13.7 on plants in moistened substrate, and 15.2 on plants in water (Table 1). Twelve eggs were observed in a clutch by Lehman (1930).

In the first observations (leaflets with water), the life cycle of B. cockerelli took on average 20.2 d (range: 20–27 d). On potted plants in the laboratory, it took 18.7 d (range: 17–27 d) (Yang et al. 2013). In the second observations, 85.9% of eggs hatched, and 74% of eggs became adults across treatments. No significant differences were observed in oviposition (P = 0.8585) or egg hatching (P = 0.7164) between treatments (leaflets in water, seedlings in water, and plant with substrate) (Table 1).

Plants remained in good condition until the second experiment was finished. Both leaflets and plants kept growing and often developed roots in vials. This root development may be useful for experimental evaluations. Leaflets with few (near 10) nymphs remained viable for at least 3 wk; the plants (both in water and substrate), for up to 5 wk.

Kaur et al. (2020) observed B. cockerelli on potato leaves, in an arena composed of a plastic cup (29.5 mL) and a 1.5 mL vial; however, its shape and size make observations under the stereoscope difficult. Flat, clear Petri dishes of a small size, and easy manipulation of our chamber allow observations under the stereoscope; leaflets or plants can be used with water or solid substrates. Also it is useful for the following: B. cockerelli on potato leaflets, and pepper (Capsicum annuum L.; Solanaceae) and nightshade (Solanum elaeagnifolium Cav.; Solanaceae) twigs; Asian citrus psyllid (Diaphorina citri Kuwayama; Hemiptera: Liviidae), on orange (Citrus × sinensis Osbeck; Rutaceae) and orange jessamine (Murraya paniculata L. Jack; Rutaceae); and western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande; Thysanoptera: Thripidae), and on bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.; Fabaceae) leaves.

This chamber is easy to implement and replicate; it allows examination under the stereoscope of oviposition, hatching, development time, and mortality of insects. It is a simple option for observation of B. cockerelli and other insects. These results can be a baseline for experimental analysis of phytophagous insects and plants.

Supported by UAAAN project 2434, Dirección de Investigación; and CONACYT Scholarship to CDL and ARC.

References Cited

1.

Echegaray ER, Vinchesi AC, Rondon SI, Alvarez JM, McKinley N. 2016. Potato psyllid (Hemiptera: Triozidae) response to insecticides under controlled greenhouse conditions. Journal of Economic Entomology 110: 1–8. Google Scholar

2.

Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo CW. 2017. InfoStat Version 2017. Grupo InfoStat, Córdoba, Spain. Google Scholar

3.

Kaur N, Cooper WR, Duringer JM, Rashed A, Badillo-Vargas IE, Esparza-Díaz G, Horton DR. 2020. Mortality of potato psyllid (Hemiptera: Triozidae) on host clippings inoculated with ergot alkaloids. Journal of Economic Entomology 113: 2079–2085. Google Scholar

4.

Lehman RS. 1930. Some observations on the life history of the tomato psyllid (Paratrioza cockerelli Sulc.) (Homoptera). Journal of the New York Entomological Society 38: 307–312. Google Scholar

5.

Liu D, Trumble JT. 2005. Interactions of plant resistance and insecticides on the development and survival of Bactericera cockerelli (Sulc) (Homoptera: Psyllidae). Crop Protection 24: 111–117. Google Scholar

6.

Reyes-Corral CA, Rodney CW, Karasev AV, Delgado-Luna C, Sanchez-Peña SR. 2021. ‘ Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ infection of Physalis ixocarpa Brot. (Solanales: Solanaceae) in Saltillo, Mexico. Plant Disease 105: 2560–2566. Google Scholar

7.

Szczepaniec A, Kristyne AV, Mahnaz K, Li P, Charles MR. 2019. Incidence of resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides in Bactericera cockerelli across southwest U.S. Crop Protection 116: 188–195. Google Scholar

8.

Wagan TA, Cai W, Hua H. 2018. Repellency, toxicity, and anti-oviposition of essential oil of Gardenia jasminoides and its four major chemical components against whiteflies and mites. Scientific Reports 8: 1–12. Google Scholar

9.

Yang XB, Zhang YM, Henne DC, Liu TX. 2013. Life tables of Bactericera cockerelli (Hemiptera: Triozidae) on tomato under laboratory and field conditions in southern Texas. Florida Entomologist 96: 904–913. Google Scholar
Carolina Delgado-Luna, Álvaro Romero-Castillo, Ernesto Cerna-Chávez, and Sergio R. Sánchez-Peña "A Portable Chamber for Experimental Observations of Bactericera Cockerelli on Plant Seedlings and Leaves," Florida Entomologist 105(4), 323-325, (6 January 2023). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.105.0412
Published: 6 January 2023
KEYWORDS
fitófago
insect
insecto
laboratorio
laboratory
phytophagous
Solanaceae
Back to Top