Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2008 Removal of Fungal Contaminants and their DNA from the Surface of Diaphorina citri (hemiptera: psyllidae) Prior to a Molecular Survey of Endosymbionts
Jason M. Meyer, Marjorie A. Hoy
Author Affiliations +

Endosymbionts play diverse roles in arthropod biology (Dale & Moran 2006), and molecular surveys to detect arthropod-associated microbes have bypassed the necessity of culturing them in vitro for identification (Darby & Welburn 2006). To date, no consistent method has been developed to eliminate microbial DNA from the external surfaces of arthropods prior to conducting molecular surveys of endosymbionts. This is problematic because resolving the relationships between a host and its endosymbionts can be complicated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of DNA from contaminating external microbes (Thornhill et al. 2008). A variety of techniques that may kill microbes on arthropod surfaces have been reported, including washing with acetone (Fukatsu & Nikoh 1998), ethanol (Davidson et al. 1994; Van Borm et al. 2002), bleach (Davidson et al. 1994), formaldehyde (Duperchy & Zimmermann 2003), exposure to ultraviolet light (Van Borm et al. 2002), radiation (Duperchy & Zimmermann 2003) and antibiotic treatment (Duperchy & Zimmermann 2003). However, the effectiveness of these methods for eliminating DNA from external microbes so that it is not amplified in subsequent PCRs has not been evaluated.

DNA from contaminating external fungi should be eliminated, if possible, prior to determining if there are endosymbiotic fungi associated with a laboratory colony of the Asian citrus psyllid Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). Examples of fungal endosymbionts have been reported in association with other hemipteran insects, including aphids and planthoppers (Noda et al. 1994; Fukatsu & Ishikawa 1995; Hongoh & Ishikawa 2000). A laboratory colony of D. citri (Skelley & Hoy 2004) was used to evaluate a variety of solutions (Table 1) for their ability to kill surface-inhabiting fungi and to eliminate their DNA so that they could not be detected using a high-fidelity PCR protocol. Adult D. citri in this colony support an abundance of external fungal growth, primarily on the ventral portion of their abdomens. This is due to being reared in high densities at a high relative humidity, which facilitates an accumulation of excreted honeydew that supports fungal growth (Fig. 1A).

Surface decontamination was conducted in a Plexiglass® hood that was first washed with 70% EtOH, then with bleach (6% sodium hypochlorite), and DNA Away (Molecular BioProducts, San Diego, CA). The protocol involved: (i) placing individual live insects into sterile 15-mL centrifuge tubes containing 5 mL of the decontamination solution and vortexing vigorously for 1 min; (ii) the solution was discarded, leaving the insects in the tube; (iii) insects were rinsed 3 X with 10 mL of sterile water, which was discarded after each rinse; (iv) insects were transferred to a sterile 1.5-mL centrifuge tube with a sterile pipette tip wetted with DNA extraction buffer prior to DNA extraction (Jeyaprakash & Hoy 2000). The efficacy of the surface decontamination treatments was determined with both culturing and molecular methods. Four replicates of 3 adult D. citri were treated with each decontamination solution and 2 replicates each were used in the following culturing and molecular experiments, respectively.

In the culturing experiments, adult D. citri treated with each decontamination solution were gently rolled on nutrient agar (NA) plates in a “Z” pattern with a sterile pipette tip and held in a growth chamber at 25°C with a 16L:8D photoperiod to determine if fungal growth occurred. No fungal growth was observed on the NA plates following treatment of D. citri with bleach alone or bleach + Tween 20; all other treatments failed to consistently kill the external fungi. Treatment with Tween 20 alone did not inhibit fungal growth on NA plates, indicating that bleach alone was sufficient to kill the external fungi. Following bleach treatment, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed a reduction of fungi on the ovipositor of adult females of D. citri compared to untreated females (Fig. 1A-B).

The external-inhabiting fungi of water-treated (control) D. citri were cultured on NA plates for 7 d and identified following high-fidelity PCR amplification (Barnes 1994; Jeyaprakash & Hoy 2000) of the fungal 28S rRNA gene (large ribosomal subunit: LSU) with primers LS1 and LR5 (Hausner at al. 1993; Rehner & Samuels 1995). PCR products were cloned, analyzed with a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) technique, and sequenced according to Jeyaprakash et al. (2003). After RsaI digest, 2 unique banding patterns were detected among the 10 clones selected, and clones representing each unique RFLP were sequenced. The first sequence was 856 bp (Genbank Accession EU500238) and produced significant BLAST alignments to the LSU gene of multiple Ascomycete species in the genus Penicillium. Fungi in this genus are associated with citrus and can cause citrus green mold, a damaging post-harvest disease (Smilanick et al. 2006). The second sequence was 857 bp (Genbank accession EU500239) and was 100% identical (857/857 bp) to a homologous region of the LSU gene of the Ascomycete Cladosporium cladosporioides (GenBank accession DQ008145), the causal organism of Cercospora leaf spot in olives. Previously, a Cladosporium species was reported as a pathogen of D. citri during periods of high relative humidity (Aubert 1987). These fungi are likely only external contaminants and are not fungal endosymbionts of D. citri.

In the molecular experiments, DNA was extracted from treated insects and used in the PCR to determine if surface decontamination eliminated the external fungal DNA. No PCR amplification products were obtained for the LSU with DNA isolated from D. citri treated with bleach or bleach + Tween 20, indicating that bleach treatment eliminated or damaged the fungal DNA sufficiently so it was not amplified. This also showed that there are no obligate fungal endosymbionts associated with a laboratory colony of D. citri or, if so, the titer of the fungal DNA was below the sensitivity of the high-fidelity PCR protocol used here. PCR products were obtained for the fungal LSU using template DNA isolated from D. citri treated with all of the other decontamination solutions tested, demonstrating that these treatments were insufficient to eliminate the DNA from these external fungi.

DNA was isolated from adults and soft-bodied nymphs of D. citri, which each host a suite of previously described eubacterial endosymbionts (Subandiyah et al. 2000; Meyer et al. 2007), to determine if external exposure to bleach interfered with PCR amplification of host genomic or endosymbiont DNA. Bleach treatment was conducted on adults of the thelytokous D. citri parasitoid Diaphorencyrtus aligarhensis (Shafee, Alam and Agarwal) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), which hosts the endosymbiotic bacterium Wolbachia (Jeyaprakash & Hoy 2000; Meyer & Hoy 2007), and tested similarly. For the host genomic DNA analyses, 2 replicates of 3 of these insects each were treated with bleach or water (control) and used for DNA extraction and PCR detection of the single-copy nuclear actin gene (Hoy et al. 2000). For the bacterial endosymbiont DNA analyses, the 16S rRNA gene of the primary endosymbiont (Subandiyah et al. 2000) and the Wolbachia wspA gene (Braig et al. 1998) were amplified from adults and nymphs of D. citri and adult D. aligarhensis, respectively. In summary, for each replicate, bleach treatment did not interfere with PCR amplification of either host genomic or endosymbiont DNA from adults or nymphs of D. citri or adult D. aligarhensis. Both the host genomic and endosymbiont DNA was PCR amplified in the control experiments (water treatment) for these insects, as expected.

Together, these experiments demonstrated that the surface decontamination protocol with bleach treatment reduced the amount of fungal cells from the external surfaces of D. citri and reduced the titer and/or quality of external fungal DNA so that it was not amplified in a high-fidelity PCR, despite the fact that this PCR protocol typically can detect as few as 100 copies of target DNA 100% of the time (Jeyaprakash & Hoy 2000). Following bleach treatment, no fungal endosymbionts were identified in the molecular survey of our laboratory colony of D. citri. Also, bleach treatment did not prohibit PCR amplification of host genomic or eubacterial endosymbiont DNA from D. citri or its parasitoid. This was consistent with the findings of Linville and Wells (2002), where bleach treatment of maggots reduced the amount of external contaminating DNA and did not interfere with subsequent mitochondrial DNA analysis of food consumed by the insect. Surface decontamination with bleach may be useful to reduce false positives caused by contaminating external-inhabiting microbes in future molecular surveys of endosymbionts in arthropods or other organisms. Further research is needed to determine if bleach treatment is effective in removing DNA from other microbial taxa that inhabit the external surfaces of arthropods, such as Eubacteria.

Summary

Bleach treatment reduced the quantity of intact DNA from external fungi sufficiently so that it was not amplifiable with a high-fidelity PCR protocol, while maintaining the integrity of insect genomic and eubacterial endosymbiont DNA for downstream PCR applications.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. J. Becnel for assistance with SEM. This research was funded by the Davies, Fischer and Eckes Endowment in biological control to Dr. M. A. Hoy.

References Cited

1.

B. Aubert 1987. Trioza erytreae Del Guercio and Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Homoptera: Psylloidea), the two vectors of citrus greening disease: Biological aspects and possible control strategies. Fruits 42:149–162. Google Scholar

2.

W. M. Barnes 1994. PCR amplification of up to 35-kb DNA with high fidelity and high yield from λ bacteriophage templates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:2216–2220. Google Scholar

3.

H. R. Braig, W. Zhou, S. L. Dobson, and S. L. O’Neill . 1998. Cloning and characterization of a gene encoding the major surface protein of the bacterial endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis. J. Bacteriol 180:2373–2378. Google Scholar

4.

C. Dale and N. A. Moran . 2006. Molecular interactions between bacterial symbionts and their hosts. Cell 126:453–465. Google Scholar

5.

A. C. Darby and S. C. Welburn . 2006. Symbiont culture. pp. 141-155 In K. Bourtzis and T. A. Miller [eds.], Insect Symbiosis (Volume 2), Taylor and Francis Group, LLC. Boca Raton, FL. Google Scholar

6.

E. W. Davidson, B. J. Segura, R. Steele, and D. L. Hendrix . 1994. Microorganisms influence the composition of honeydew produced by the silverleaf whitefly, Bemisia argentifolii. J. Insect Physiol 40:1069–1076. Google Scholar

7.

E. Duperchy and G. Zimmerman . 2003. A simple and rapid procedure to obtain aseptic larvae of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, for molecular investigations. J. Invertebr. Pathol 84:238–239. Google Scholar

8.

T. Fukatsu and H. Ishikawa . 1995. Phylogenetic position of yeast-like symbiont of Hamiltonaphis styrace (Homoptera, Aphididae) based on 18S rDNA Sequence. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol 26:383–388. Google Scholar

9.

T. Fukatsu and N. Nikoh . 1998. Two intracellular symbiotic bacteria from the mulberry psyllid Anomoneuramori (Insecta, Homoptera). Appl. Environ. Microbiol 64:3599–3606. Google Scholar

10.

G. Hausner, J. Reid, and G. R. Klassen . 1993. On the subdivision of Ceratocystis s.l., based on partial ribosomal DNA sequences. Can. J. Botany 71:52–63. Google Scholar

11.

Y. Hongoh and H. Ishikawa . 2000. Evolutionary studies on uricases of fungal endosymbionts of aphids and planthoppers. J. Mol. Evol 51:265–277. Google Scholar

12.

M. A. Hoy, A. Jeyparakash, R. Morakote, P. K. C. Lo, and R. Nguyen . 2000. Genomic analyses of two populations of Ageniaspiscitricola (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) suggest that a cryptic species may exist. Biol. Control 17:1–10. Google Scholar

13.

A. Jeyaprakash and M. A. Hoy . 2000. Long PCR improves Wolbachia DNA amplification: wsp sequences found in 76% of sixty-three arthropod species. Insect Mol. Biol 9:393–405. Google Scholar

14.

A. Jeyaprakash, M. A. Hoy, and M. H. Allsopp . 2003. Bacterial diversity in worker adults of Apismelliferacapensis and Apismelliferascutellata (Insect: Hymenoptera) assessed using 16S rRNA sequences. J. Invertebr. Pathol 84:96–103. Google Scholar

15.

J. G. Linville and J. D. Wells . 2002. Surface sterilization of a maggot using bleach does not interfere with mitochondrial DNA analysis of crop contents. J. Forens. Sci 47:1–5. Google Scholar

16.

J. M. Meyer and M. A. Hoy . 2007. Wolbachia-associated thelytoky in Diaphorencyrtusaligarhensis (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), a parasitoid of the Asian citrus psyllid. Florida Entomol 90(4):776–779. Google Scholar

17.

MeyerJ. M, M. AHoy, and RSingh . 2007. Low incidence of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) populations between Nov 2005 and Jan 2006: Relevance to management of citrus greening disease in Florida. Florida Entomol 90(2):394–397. Google Scholar

18.

H. Noda, N. Nakashima, and M. Koizumi . 1994. Phylogenetic position of yeast-like symbiotes of rice planthoppers based on partial 18S rDNA sequences. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol 25:639–646. Google Scholar

19.

S. A. Rehner and G. J. Samuels . 1995. Molecular systematics of the Hypocreales: a telomorph gene phylogeny and the status of their anamorphs. Canadian J. Botany 73:S816–S823. Google Scholar

20.

L. H. Skelley and M. A. Hoy . 2004. A synchronous rearing method for the Asian citrus psyllid and its parasitoids in quarantine. Biol. Control 29:14–23. Google Scholar

21.

J. L. Smilanick, M. F Mansour, F. M. Gabler, and W. R. Goodwine . 2006. The effectiveness of pyrimethanil to inhibit germination of Penicilliumdigitatum and to control citrus green mold after harvest. Posthar. Biol. Technol 42:75–85. Google Scholar

22.

S. N. Subandiyah, N. Nikoh, S. Tsuyumu, S. Somowiyarjo, and T. Fukatsu . 2000. Complex endosymbiotic microbiota of the citrus psyllid Diaphorina citri (Homoptera: Psylloidea). Zool. Sci 17:983–989. Google Scholar

23.

D. J. Thornhill, A. A. Wiley, A. L. Campbell, F. F. Bartol, A. Teske, and K. M. Halanych . 2008. Endosymbionts of Siboglinumfiordicum and the phylogeny of bacterial endosymbionts in Siboglinidae (Annelida). Biol. Bull 214:135–144. Google Scholar

24.

S. Van Borm, J. Billen, and J. J. Boomsma . 2002. The diversity of microorganisms associated with Acromyrmex leafcutter ants. BMC Evol. Biol 2(9):1–11. Google Scholar

Fig. 1.

SEM of the ovipositor of an adult female D. citri from the laboratory colony. (A) untreated female, showing abundant fungal growth; (B) bleach-treated female, showing removal of most of the fungal growth. Scale: (A) 0.1 μm; (B) 0.2 μm.

i0015-4040-91-4-702-f01.gif

Table 1.

Two methods were used to evaluate if surface decontamination solutions killed external fungi and eliminated their DNA from a laboratory colony of adult D. citri. following treatment with each decontamination solution, adult D. citri were used to inoculate nutrient agar (NA) plates that were monitored for fungal growth. A high-fidelity PCR protocol was used to amplify the fungal 28S rRNA gene (large ribosomal subunit: LSU) with template DNA extracted from treated adult D. citri.

i0015-4040-91-4-702-t01.gif
Jason M. Meyer and Marjorie A. Hoy "Removal of Fungal Contaminants and their DNA from the Surface of Diaphorina citri (hemiptera: psyllidae) Prior to a Molecular Survey of Endosymbionts," Florida Entomologist 91(4), 702-705, (1 December 2008). https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040-91.4.702
Published: 1 December 2008
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top