Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2011 Diversity of Scolytinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Attracted to Avocado, Lychee, and Essential Oil Lures
Paul E. Kendra, Jorge S. Sanchez, Wayne S. Montgomery, Katherine E. Okins, Jerome Niogret, Jorge E. Peña, Nancy D. Epsky, Robert R. Heath
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The redbay ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus glabratus Eichhoff (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), is an exotic wood-boring insect that vectors laurel wilt, a lethal vascular disease of trees in the Lauraceae, including avocado (Persea americana) and native Persea species (redbay, swampbay). As part of research to identify host-based attractants for X. glabratus, we discovered that a diverse array of non-target ambrosia beetles was attracted to the same substrates as X. glabratus. During Sep–Dec 2009, several field tests were conducted in north Florida (in woodlands with advanced stages of laurel wilt) with traps baited with commercial lures of the essential oils, manuka and phoebe, and with freshly-cut wood bolts of avocado (a known host) and lychee (Litchi chinensis, a non-host high in the sesquiterpene αcopaene, a putative host attractant). In addition, manuka-baited traps were deployed in avocado groves in south Florida to monitor for potential spread of X. glabratus. The combined trapping results indicated that none of these substrates was specific in attraction of X. glabratus. Numerous non-target ambrosia beetles were captured, including 17 species representative of 4 tribes within the subfamily Scolytinae. This report provides photo-documentation and data on the species diversity and relative abundance for a group of poorly-studied beetles, the scolytine community in Florida Persea habitats.

The redbay ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus glabratus Eichhoff (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), is an exotic wood-boring insect that vectors laurel wilt, a lethal vascular disease of trees in the Lauraceae (Fraedrich et al. 2008). Haploid males are flightless and remain within the host tree, while diploid females (typically siblingmated) disperse to colonize new hosts. Unlike most ambrosia beetles, female X. glabratus are primary colonizers, capable of attacking healthy unstressed trees. During gallery excavation, females introduce spores of a symbiotic fungus, Raffaelea lauricola T.C. Harr., Fraedrich & Aghayeva (Harrington et al. 2008), carried in mycangial pouches located at the base of the mandibles (Fraedrich et al. 2008). The fungus provides food for both larvae and adults, but it also invades the host vascular system and results in systemic wilt and ultimately tree death. Native to south-eastern Asia, X. glabratus was first detected in the U.S. in 2002 near Port Wentworth, Georgia (Rabaglia et al. 2006). Since then, the vector-disease complex has spread along the coastal plain into South Carolina and Florida, and has been reported from a single county in Mississippi (USDA-FS 2010). In northern Florida, high mortality has occurred in native Persea species, including redbay (P. borbonia (L.) Spreng.) and swampbay (P. palustris (Raf.) Sarg.), and the rapid southward spread of the pest complex currently threatens commercial groves of avocado (P. americana Mill.), a confirmed susceptible host (Mayfield et al. 2008). Florida's avocado production, centered in Miami-Dade County, is worth $13 million annually (USDA-NASS 2010), and replacement costs of all avocado trees (commercial and backyard) in Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach, and Lee Counties have been estimated at $429 million (Evans & Crane 2008).

Due to the serious economic threat posed by X. glabratus, there is a critical need for effective attractants to detect, monitor, and control the spread of this invasive pest. Preliminary research provided no evidence of an aggregation pheromone and no strong attraction to its fungal symbiont, to its frass, or to ethanol (a standard attractant for ambrosia beetles); suggesting that host tree volatiles are the primary attractants for dispersing females (Hanula et al. 2008). Additional studies identified manuka and phoebe oils (essential oil extracts from the tea tree, Leptospermum scoparium Forst. & Forst., and the Brazilian walnut, Phoebe porosa Mez., respectively) as effective baits for field monitoring of X. glabratus in South Carolina (Hanula & Sullivan 2008). Based on comparisons of volatile chemicals emitted from chipped redbay wood, manuka oil, and phoebe oil, Hanula & Sullivan (2008) hypothesized that 2 sesquiterpenes, α-copaene and calamenene, were likely the primary host attractants.

While conducting research to evaluate attraction of female X. glabratus to wood volatiles and essential oil lures, we discovered that a diverse number of non-target ambrosia beetles (both endemics and exotics established in Florida) were attracted to the same substrates as X. glabratus. Several field tests were conducted in north-central Florida (Alachua and Marion Counties) in natural stands of redbay and swampbay with known infestations of X. glabratus and visible signs of laurel wilt disease. We used 4-funnel Lindgren traps and/or sticky panels baited with commercially available essential oil lures (manuka and phoebe) or with freshly-cut wood bolts of avocado (a confirmed host) and lychee (Litchi chinensis Sonn., a presumed non-host). Lychee is in the family Sapindacaeae; it lacks the typical aromatic laurel volatiles, but it has a high content of α-copaene (Niogret et al. unpublished). During that same period, monitoring traps (Lindgren traps baited with manuka lures) were deployed in avocado groves in south Florida (Miami-Dade County). This report summarizes and illustrates the ambrosia beetles captured over a 4-month period (Sep–Dec 2009) in Florida to (1) provide a tool for action agencies and field scientists to facilitate identification of non-target species captured in X. glabratus monitoring traps, (2) document the species diversity and relative abundance for the scolytine community in Persea habitats, and (3) identify potential secondary colonizers of Persea hosts subsequent to initial attack by X. glabratus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Field test 1 was conducted in Citra, Marion County, FL at the University of Florida Agricultural Experiment Station (PSREU). The back edge of the station bordered an upland wooded area dominated by mature live oak (Quercus virginiana Mill.) with an understory that included redbay trees symptomatic for laurel wilt. Test 1 was run from 27 Aug–22 Oct 2009 and consisted of 6 treatments: a commercial manuka lure (Synergy Semiochemicals, Burnaby, BC), wood bolts from 3 avocado cultivare representative of the 3 horticultural races (‘Simmonds’, West Indian race; ‘Brooks Late’, Guatemalan race; and ‘Seed-less Mexican–, Mexican race), bolts from lychee (cv. ‘Hanging Green’), and an unbaited control. Wood bolts were collected from the USDA-ARS germplasm collection at the Subtropical Horticulture Research Station (SHRS), Miami, FL 1 d prior to test deployment. The ends of the bolts were coated with wax to prevent desiccation, and then both ends re-cut when used as baits at the start of the test. All baits were deployed in four-funnel Lindgren traps (BioQuip, Rancho Dominguez, CA) with 300 mL of an aqueous solution of 10% propylene glycol (Low-Tox antifreeze; Prestone, Danbury, CT) added to the collection cup. For the manuka treatment, a single lure was hung from the trap lid by a wire twist tie. For the wood substrates, 2 freshly-cut bolts (5 cm diam × 15 cm length) were suspended with wire from the lid on opposite sides of the trap. Experimental design was a randomized complete block, with 5 replicate blocks arranged in a linear array along the fence at the back of the research station. Within a block, traps were spaced 10 m apart, 1.5 m above the ground, and spacing was 50 m between replicate blocks. Traps were checked every 2 weeks for a total of 8 weeks. At each sampling date, the retention solutions (with insect captures) were collected, a thin layer was sawed from the lower end of each bolt (to “renew” release of wood volatiles), the collection cups were refilled, and trap positions were rotated sequentially within each block to minimize potential positional effects on beetle capture.

Field tests 2 and 3 were conducted in Cross Creek, Alachua County, FL at the Lochloosa Wild-life Conservation Area (St. John's River Water Management District). The study site consisted of mesic flatwoods composed of an over story of slash pine (Pinus elliottii Englem) with a mixed understory that included numerous swampbay trees exhibiting advanced stages of laurel wilt. Test 2 was conducted from 7 Oct–2 Dec 2009 and evaluated the same 6 treatments described above. Test 3 was conducted from 5 Nov–29 Dec (at a site adjacent to test 2) and contained a commercial phoebe lure (Synergy Semiochemicals) in addition to the 6 treatments above. However, with tests 2 and 3 there were differences in trap type and trap layout. The essential oil lures were still deployed in four-funnel Lindgren traps, but the wood bolts were paired and hung vertically with 2 white sticky panels (23 cm × 28 cm, Sentry wing trap bottoms; Great Lakes IPM, Vestaburg, MI) stapled back-to-back at the bottom of the bolts. Sticky panels were further secured with several binder clips around the edges. Tests 2 and 3 followed randomized complete block design, with 5 replicate blocks arranged in a rectangular grid. Each block consisted of a row of traps hung ∼2 m high in non-host trees, with a minimum of 10 m spacing between adjacent traps in a row, and with 50 m spacing between rows. Both tests were 8 weeks in duration and checked every 2 weeks. At each check, the retention solutions and sticky panels were collected, a thin layer was sawed from the bottom of each bolt, the solutions/panels were replaced, and the trap positions were rotated sequentially within each row.

In addition to the field tests conducted in north Florida, monitoring/survey traps were deployed in several avocado groves in Miami-Dade County, FL during the fall of 2009. All monitoring traps consisted of four-funnel Lindgren traps baited with manuka lures, which were hung ∼2 m above ground within the canopy of avocado trees. Traps were checked at 2-week intervals and sites included the SHRS avocado germplasm collection in Miami and 3 commercial groves in Homestead.

All sample collections (from monitoring traps and field tests) were sorted in the laboratory at SHRS, and scolytine species were counted, photographed, and stored in 70% ethanol. Specimens removed from sticky panels were soaked overnight in histological clearing agent (Histo-clear II; National Diagnostics, Atlanta, GA) prior to storage in alcohol. Beetle identifications were confirmed at FDACS-DPI (Gainesville, FL) by K. E. Okins, and voucher specimens were deposited at both DPI and SHRS.

RESULTS

The combined trapping results from field tests and monitoring traps totaled 659 ambrosia beetles, consisting of 17 species from 4 tribes within the subfamily Scolytinae (Table 1). More than 90% of the captures were from the tribe Xyleborini, and only 1 specimen (Coccotrypes distinctus (Motshulsky)) was representative of the tribe Dryocoetini. With the exception of X. glabratus (Fig. 1), most beetles were captured in fairly low numbers, with many species represented by only a single capture, despite significant trapping efforts with a variety of host-based attractants. Xyleborus glabratus comprised the majority of captures in north Florida, as expected due to its invasive pest status, but the percentages varied by site (15% in Marion County with test 1; 75.4% and 86.2% in Alachua County with tests 2 and 3, respectively). Four other species of Xyleborus were captured (Fig. 2), with X. ferrugineus (Fabricius) (Fig. 2A) and X. affinis (Eichhoff) (Fig. 2B) the 2 most abundant species after X. glabratus. There were several other representatives within the tribe Xyleborini (Fig. 3), with Ambrosiodmus obliquus (LeConte) (Fig. 3A) a dominant species at both the Alachua site and in the Miami-Dade avocado groves.

The tribe Cryphalini was represented by Hypothenemus dissimilis (Zimmerman) and several other Hypothenemus species difficult to discern to species level (Fig. 4). Hypothenemus beetles were major components at the Marion site and in Miami-Dade County. Within the tribe Corthylini, 5 species were captured, of which 4 are presented in Fig. 5. Two of those ambrosia beetles had distinctive morphological features. Females of Corthylus papulans Eichhoff (Fig. 5C) have greatly enlarged terminal antennal segments which bear several long, recurved setae (Fig 5E); males of C. papulans lack the characteristic setae. In Pityoborus comatus (Zimmerman) (Fig. 5D), females are unique in that the mycangia are located on the pronotum, and consist of a pair of large shallow depressions covered with dense pubescence (Fig. 5F; Furniss et al. 1987).

DISCUSSION

The subfamily Scolytinae contains 2 functionally distinct groups of beetles - bark beetles which feed on phloem from the inner bark of host trees, and ambrosia beetles which cultivate and feed on symbiotic fungi within the xylem layers (Rabaglia 2002). Among the bark beetles, there are major forest pests which have been well studied, including the southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman (Chellman & Wilkinson 1980), the western pine engraver, Ips pini (Say) (Kegley et al. 1997), and several other Ips spp. found in the southeastern U.S. (Conner & Wilkinson 1998). In contrast, the ambrosia beetles are generally not of economic importance and consequently have received less attention. They are minute beetles, spend the majority of their life concealed within host trees, and typically attack stressed or dying trees. Despite the large number of described species (e.g., >500 currently recognized Xyleborus spp. worldwide, Rabaglia et al. 2006), much is unknown regarding the basic biology, ecology, host range, fungal symbionts, and population dynamics of many endemic ambrosia beetles. Far less is known about exotic invasive species, which are not pests in their native lands but may acquire pest status when introduced into new environments, as is the case with X. glabratus in the U.S.

TABLE 1.

AMBROSIA BEETLES (CURCULIONIDAE: SCOLYTINAE) CAPTURED IN MARION, ALACHUA, AND MIAMI-DADE COUNTIES, FL FROM SEP–DEC 2009, ARRANGED ACCORDING TO LAWRENCE & NEWTON (1995).

t01_123.gif

Although our research was focused on identification of attractants specifically for detection and control of X. glabratus, information was obtained concurrently on the species diversity and relative abundance for the ambrosia beetles found in native Persea habitats in north-central Florida. In south Florida the trapping effort was less intensive, but preliminary data was also obtained for the species composition in avocado groves. This summary report identifies the species of Scolytinae most likely to be encountered while monitoring for X. glabratus, and the photo-documentation provides fellow researchers (non-taxonomists) and action agency personnel with a convenient tool for preliminary identification of nontarget captures.

Some of the non-target beetles identified herein are species that may potentially function as secondary vectors of the laurel wilt pathogen. Once healthy trees are attacked by X. glabratus, the stressed trees are susceptible to further attack by secondary colonizers that can contribute to the rapid mortality seen in laurel hosts. Observations made on dead swampbay trees at the Lochloosa Conservation Area (Kendra et al. unpublished) indicated that multiple wood-boring species attacked those Persea trees, as evidenced by bore holes of various diameters. These secondary colonizers may potentially pick up Raffaelea from the host xylem and transport it to new trees, accelerating the spread of laurel wilt. In north Florida, X. ferrugineus, X. affinis, and A. obliquus were the most abundant species in native Persea habitats; in avocado A. obliquus and Hypothenemus spp. were dominant. In South Carolina, Hanula et al. (2008) found that Xylosandrus crassiusculus (Motschulsky) was attracted to wounded redbay trees. Further research should evaluate these additional beetle species to (a) determine if stressed (diseased) trees in the Lauraceae can serve as hosts, and if so, then (b) determine if Raffaelea spores can be recovered from the mycangia of ambrosia beetles that developed within Raffaelea-infected hosts. In other systems, there is evidence that exchange or “cross contamination” of symbiotic fungi may occur among ambrosia beetle species that occupy a common breeding site (Gebhardt et al. 2004). Alternatively, Raffaelea spores may potentially be transported passively by the setae and/or cuticular asperities (protuberances) commonly found on the anterior slope of the female pronotum, as has been demonstrated for Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) and spores of Fusarium solani (Martius) (Morales-Ramos et al. 2000).

Fig. 1.

The redbay ambrosia beetle Xyleborus glabratus Eichhoff, vector of a lethal wilt fungus (Raffaellea lauricola) causing high mortality of trees in the Lauraceae in the southeastern U.S.A. Female. B. Male. (Note: Males of X. glabratus are flightless; this specimen was obtained from host wood, not from a flight trap.)

f01_123.jpg

Fig. 2.

Four species of Xyleborus not of economic importance. A. X. ferrugineus (Fabricius). B. X. affinis (Eichhoff). C. X. volvulus (Fabricius). D. X. californicus Wood. (All specimens female.)

f02_123.jpg

Fig. 3.

Ambrosia beetles within the tribe Xyleborini. A. Ambrosiodmus obliquas (LeConte). B. Theoborus ricini (Eggers). C. Premnobius cavipennis Eichhoff. (All specimens female.)

f03_123.jpg

The commercial lures currently available for X. glabratus are non-specific in attraction, so high numbers of non-target captures are likely to be encountered with the monitoring system (manuka-baited Lindgren traps) employed by the State of Florida. Manuka and phoebe oil lures were originally developed for field monitoring of another (phylogenetically distant) wood-boring beetle, the emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) (Crook et al. 2008). Preliminary research (Rendra et al. unpublished) indicated that these essential oil lures were not only non-specific, but may have limited field life for attraction of X. glabratus. With the data set presented here, approximately 30% of the captures were non-target species of Scolytinae. Development of effective strategies for early detection and control (i.e., attract-and-kill systems) of X. glabratus is contingent on identification of specific attractants. In the absence of species-specific pheromones or food-based attractants for X. glabratus (Hanula et al. 2008), this will be a difficult challenge.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple trapping studies targeting the redbay ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus glabratus, effectively generated a survey of the overall scolytine community resident in Florida Persea habitats. These ambrosia beetle species that co-occur with X. glabratus, are attracted to the same host-based volatile chemicals; and they are the non-target species likely to be encountered in traps set out to monitor for X. glabratus. Those species that can function as secondary colonizers of Persea hosts should be evaluated as potential secondary vectors for transmission of the laurel wilt pathogen, Raffaelea lauricola.

Fig. 4.

Ambrosia beetles within the tribe Cryphalini. A. Hypothenemus dissimilis (Zimmerman). B. Hypothenemus sp. (Both specimens female.)

f04_123.jpg

Fig. 5.

Ambrosia beetles within the tribe Corthylini. A. Monarthrum mali (Fitch). B. Pseudopityophthorus pruinosus (Eichhoff). C. Corthylus papulans Eichhoff. D. Pityoborus comatus (Zimmerman). E. Detail of C. papulans (anterior end; ventral view) showing enlarged terminal antennal segments bearing long recurved setae. F. Detail of P. comatus (anterior end; dorsal view on left, lateral view on right) showing pronotal mycangia (oval pits covered with dense setae), the storage site for symbiotic fungal spores. (All specimens female.)

f05_123.jpg

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We gratefully acknowledge David Long, Mike Winterstein (USDA-ARS; Miami, FL), Rita Duncan (Univ. Florida; Homestead, FL), Gurpreet Brar, and Stephen McLean (Univ. Florida; Gainesville, FL) for technical assistance; Patti Anderson (FDACS-DPI, Gainesville, FL) for Persea identifications; Bud Mayfield (USDA-Forest Service; Asheville, NC) for advice on field trapping; Ray Schnell (USDA-ARS; Miami, FL) for advice on avocado germplasm samples; David Jenkins (USDA-ARS; Mayagüez, PR) and 2 anonymous reviewers for suggestions with the manuscript; Pansy Vázquez-Kendra and Elena Schnell for translation of the abstract; and Connie Rightmire (St. John's River Water Management District) for assistance in obtaining a special use permit for the Lochloosa Wildlife Conservation Area. This work was supported in part by the USDA-ARS National Plant Disease Recovery System and the Florida Avocado Administrative Committee. This report presents the results of research only; mention of a proprietary product does not constitute an endorsement by the USDA.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

C. W. Chellman , and R. C. Wilkinson 1980. Southern pine beetle outbreaks in Florida since 1974. Florida Entomol. 63: 515. Google Scholar

2.

M. D. Conner , and R. C. Wilkinson 1998. Ips Bark Beetles in the South. Forest insect and disease leaflet 129. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. < http://www.na.fs.fed.us/spfo/pubs/fidls/ips/ipsfidl.htmGoogle Scholar

3.

D. J. Crook , A. Khrimian , J. A. Francese , I. Fraser , T. M. Poland , A. J. Sawyer , and V. C. Mastro 2008. Development of a host-based semiochemical lure for trapping emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Environ. Entomol. 37: 356–365. Google Scholar

4.

E. A. Evans , and J. H. Crane 2008. Estimation of the Replacement Costs of Commercial and Backyard Avocado Trees in South Florida. Circular FE 825. University of Florida, Department of Food and Resource Economics. < http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/FE/FE82500.pdfGoogle Scholar

5.

S. W. Fraedrich , T. C. Harrington , R. J. Rabaglia , M. D. Ulyshen , A. E. Mayfield III , J. L. Hanula , J. M. Eickwort , and D. R. Miller 2008. A fungal symbiont of the redbay ambrosia beetle causes a lethal wilt in redbay and other Lauraceae in the south-eastern United States. Plant Dis. 92: 215–224. Google Scholar

6.

M. M. Furniss , J. Y. Woo , M. A. Deyrup , and T. H. Atkinson 1987. Prothoracic mycangium on pine-infesting Pityoborus spp. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 80: 692–696. Google Scholar

7.

H. Gebhardt , D. Begerow , and F. Oberwinkler 2004. Identification of the ambrosia fungus of Xyleborus monographus and X. dryographus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae). Mycol. Progress 3: 95–102. Google Scholar

8.

J. L. Hanula , and B. Sullivan 2008. Manuka oil and phoebe oil are attractive baits for Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Scolytinae), the vector of laurel wilt. Environ. Entomol. 37: 1403–1409. Google Scholar

9.

J. L. Hanula , A. E. Mayfield III , S. W. Fraedrich , and R. J. Rabaglia 2008. Biology and host associations of the redbay ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), exotic vector of laurel wilt killing redbay trees in the southeastern United States. J. Econ. Entomol. 101: 1276–1286. Google Scholar

10.

T. C. Harrington , S. W. Fraedrich , and D. N. Aghayeva 2008. Raffaelea lauricola, a new ambrosia beetle symbiont and pathogen on the Lauraceae. Mycotaxon 104: 399–404. Google Scholar

11.

S. J. Kegley , R. L. Livingston , and K. E. Gibson 1997. Pine Engraver, Ips pini (Say), in the Western United States. Forest insect and disease leaflet 122. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. < http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/nr/fid/fidls/fidl-122.htmGoogle Scholar

12.

J. F. Lawrence , and A. F. Newton Jr. 1995. Families and subfamilies of Coleoptera (with selected genera, notes, references and data on family-group names), pp. 779–1006 In J. Pakalud and S. A. Slipinski [eds.], Biology, Phylogeny, and Classification of Coleoptera: Papers Celebrating the 80th Birthday of Roy A. Crowson. Muzeum I Instytyt Zoologii PAN, Waszawa. Google Scholar

13.

A. E. Mayfield III , J. E. Peña , J. H. Crane , J. A. Smith , C. L. Branch , E. D. Ottoson , and M. Hughes 2008. Ability of the redbay ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) to bore into young avocado (Lauraceae) plants and transmit the laurel wilt pathogen (Raffaelea sp.). Florida Entomol. 91: 485–487. Google Scholar

14.

J. A. Morales-Ramos , M. G. Rojas , H. Sittertz-Bhatkar , and G. Saldaña 2000. Symbiotic relationship between Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and Fusarium solani (Moniliales: Tuberculariaceae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 93: 541–547. Google Scholar

15.

R. J. Rabaglia 2002. XVII. Scolytinae Latreille 1807, pp. 792–805 In R. H. Arnett Jr., M. C. Thomas , P. E. Skelley , and J. H. Frank [eds.], American Beetles, vol. 2, Polyphaga: Scarabaeoidea through Curculionoidea. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. Google Scholar

16.

R. J. Rabaglia , S. A. Dole , and A. I. Cognata 2006. Review of American Xyleborina (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) occurring north of Mexico, with an illustrated key. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 99: 1034–1056. Google Scholar

17.

USDA-FS. 2010. Laurel Wilt Distribution. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, Southern Region. < http://www.fs.fed.us/r8/foresthealth/laurelwilt/dist_map.shtmlGoogle Scholar

18.

USDA-NASS. 2010. Noncitrus Fruits and Nuts: 2009 preliminary summary, Fr Nt 1–3 (10) a. United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistic Service. < http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/nass/NoncFruiNu//2010s/2010/NoncFruiNu-01-22-2010_revision.pdfGoogle Scholar
Paul E. Kendra, Jorge S. Sanchez, Wayne S. Montgomery, Katherine E. Okins, Jerome Niogret, Jorge E. Peña, Nancy D. Epsky, and Robert R. Heath "Diversity of Scolytinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Attracted to Avocado, Lychee, and Essential Oil Lures," Florida Entomologist 94(2), 123-130, (1 June 2011). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.094.0201
Published: 1 June 2011
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top