Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2012 Resistance to Onion Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in OnionCultivars does not Prevent Infection by Iris Yellow SpotVirus Following Vector-Mediated Transmission
John Diaz-Montano, Marc Fuchs, Brian A. Nault, Anthony M. Shelton
Author Affiliations +

Onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), is a global pest of onion, Allium cepa L., and the principal vector of Iris yellow spot virus (IYSV) that can cause 100% crop losses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate onion cultivars resistant to T. tabaci feeding damage for their reaction to IYSV following exposure to viruliferous T. tabaci in both laboratory and field experiments. In the laboratory experiment, virus-free onion cultivars grown in pots were infested with 32 T. tabaci second instars collected from onions in an IYSV-infected field. In the complementary field experiment, virus-free onion plants in pots were moved to an onion field where IYSV was present. In both laboratory and field trials, plants were tested for IYSV by DAS-ELISA after 2 and 3 wk, respectively. Although plants were exposed to T. tabaci for a short period, IYSV was detected in all onion cultivars with the percentage of infected plants varying from 3 to 25% and 37 to 70% in the laboratory and field experiments, respectively. IYSV infection levels did not differ statistically between thrips-susceptible and thrips-resistant onion cultivars in laboratory and field experiments.

Onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), is a polyphagous pest with a host range of more than 100 plant species in more than 30 families (Ghabn 1948; Morison 1957; Ananthakrishnan 1973). T. tabaci is a widely distributed pest of onions wherever they are grown (Lewis 1997), including New York State where a total of 4,330 ha were planted in 2010 (NASS 2011). T. tabaci feeding on onion causes silvery leaf spots that turn into white blotches and silvery patches along the leaves (Bailey 1938). This damage reduces the photosynthetic ability of the plant (Parrella & Lewis 1997) and results in reduction of onion bulb weight (Kendall & Capinera 1987; Rueda et al. 2007) and yield loss from 50% (Fournier et al. 1995) to 60% (Waiganjo et al. 2008). In addition to the feeding injury, T. tabaci transmits Iris yellow spot virus (family Bunyaviridae, genus Tospovirus, IYSV) and is the principal vector of this pathogen (Pozzer et al. 1999; Kritzman et al. 2001). IYSV was first identified on onion in southern Brazil in 1981 (Pozzer et al. 1994), and was confirmed in the USA in 1989 in the Pacific Northwest (Hall et al. 1993). IYSV has spread subsequently throughout other important onion producing states in the USA and worldwide (Gent et al. 2006). IYSV symptoms on leaves appear as straw-colored to white, dry, and sometimes elongate lesions along leaf edges (Gent et al. 2006). IYSV infection can reduce bulb size (Gent et al. 2004) and cause 100% crop loss (Pozzer et al. 1999). Tospoviruses are transmitted in a persistent propagative manner. Virus acquisition occurs only during the larval stages, and it is passed transstadially to the adult; and only adult thrips that acquired the virus during their larval stages can transmit tospoviruses (Whitfield et al. 2005).

Management of T. tabaci through the use of insecticides and cultural practices has been challenging and additional methods of control are needed. The use of foliar insecticides is the most common tactic to control T. tabaci in onion, but this strategy has led to the development of populations resistant to pyrethroid and organophosphate insecticides in North America (Shelton et al. 2003, 2006; MacIntyre Allen et al. 2005) and other regions of the world (Martin et al. 2003; Herron et al. 2008; Morishita 2008). Other management practices have been investigated including host plant resistance. Different studies on onion resistance to T. tabaci have been conducted and resistance has been associated with bulb color (Verma 1966; Lall & Singh 1968; Brar et al. 1993) and leaf structure and color (Jones et al. 1934, 1935; Coudriet et al. 1979; Pawar et al. 1987; Patil et al. 1988; Hudák & Pénzes 2004; Loges et al. 2004a, 2004b; Diaz-Montano et al. 2010). Similarly, others have evaluated onion cultivars for incidence of or resistance to IYSV. For example, the response of 46 onion cultivars to IYSV infection was investigated by du Toit & Pelter (2005), and all cultivars were found susceptible to the virus with infection levels, as determined by visual symptoms, ranging from 58 to 97%. In 2007 and 2008, 47 onion cultivars were evaluated for resistance to IYSV, as determined by double antibody sandwich (DAS) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the virus was present in all cultivars, but with highly variable levels of infection: 3 to 31% in 2007 and 15 to 79% in 2008 (Diaz-Montano et al. 2010). In that study, symptoms of IYSV were mild to absent and only appeared late in the season.




The present tests were conducted in order to study and compare the reactions of different onion cultivars resistant to T. tabaci feeding to infection by IYSV following T. tabaci-mediated transmission in field and in laboratory conditions.


Plant Material

A total of 17 onion cultivars were evaluated in this study, which was conducted in New York in 2009 (Table 1). Fifteen onion cultivars that were considered resistant to T. tabaci, based on reduced numbers of larvae and lower leaf damage ratings than susceptible cultivars (Diaz-Montano et al. 2010; Diaz-Montano 2011a), were tested. The cultivars ‘Nebula’ and ‘Yankee’ were used as the susceptible checks. Information on d to maturity and bulb color was obtained from the respective companies or the breeder (Table 1). Seeds for each cultivar were planted into 200-cell 4.5 cm deep plug trays with one seed per cell filled with Cornell soil mix (Boodley & Sheldrake 1977), and then grown under greenhouse conditions at 2030 °C and 20–40% RH with supplemental lights set for a photoperiod of 14:10 h L:D. After 8 wk in the greenhouse, 4 onion plants per cultivar were transplanted individually into plastic pots (15.0 cm diam × 15.0 cm high, with 4 plants per pot) filled with Cornell soil mix (Boodley & Sheldrake 1977). IYSV is not known to be transmitted through seed and there was no source of IYSV in the greenhouses. Therefore, experimental onions were presumed to be IYSV-free before plants were infested with T. tabaci.

Reactions of Onion Thrips-Resistant Onion Cultivars to Iris yellow spot virus following T. tabaci-Mediated Transmission

To characterize the reaction of onion thrips-resistant onion cultivars to IYSV, experiments were performed under laboratory and field conditions.

Laboratory Experiment

This trial was conducted at Cornell University's New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, New York. Onion plants from the greenhouse were infested with T. tabaci collected from a commercial onion field near Elba, New York, from onion plants on which IYSV visual symptoms (straw-colored, dry diamond-shaped lesions on the leaves) were evident. A total of 32 T. tabaci second instars were placed on leaves and confined in each plastic pot with the 4 plants by using a 15-cm-diam by 30-cm-high acrylic tube inserted into the soil of each pot and the top of the tube was covered with a plastic lid. The tube had 2 holes (5 cm diam) in the middle and one additional hole (3 cm diam) on the center of the lid, and all holes were covered with an organdy cloth (thrips proof). There were 10 pots per cultivar for a total of 40 plants per cultivar.

The plastic pots were placed in racks arranged in a completely randomized design and the racks were put in a climatic chamber (25–30 °C, 40% RH at 14:10 h L:D). Two weeks after confinement with the 32 T. tabaci larvae, all onion leaves were tested for IYSV by DAS-ELISA (Clark & Adams 1977) and commercially available antibodies, as well as positive and negative controls for IYSV (Agdia Inc., Elkhart, Indiana). ELISA was used to detect the virus because visual symptoms are less reliable and asymptomatic plants in New York have been found infected with the virus (Diaz-Montano et al. 2010).

Field Experiment

This study was conducted in a commercial onion field near Elba, New York. The plastic pots containing the plants, as described above, were placed adjacent to this field. Pots were left completely open so that T. tabaci could naturally infest the plants. After 3 wk of exposure, the number of T. tabaci larvae was counted in each pot, and onion leaves were taken to the lab and tested for IYSV by DAS-ELISA, as described above. There were 10 pots per cultivar for a total of 40 plants per cultivar.

Statistical Analyses

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for T. tabaci larvae data among cultivars was conducted by using PROC GLM and controlled for blocks. Multiple comparisons were computed by using Tukey's studentized range test (P < 0.05) (SAS Institute 2003). A logistic regression model for IYSV infection levels was performed using PROC GENMOD and controlled for blocks (SAS Institute 2003). The correlation between laboratory and field IYSV infection rates and the correlation between T. tabaci larvae and IYSV rates in the field were compared using PROC CORR and the Spearman rank coefficient correlation (SAS Institute 2003).


Reaction of Onion Thrips-Resistant Onion Cultivars to Iris yellow spot virus following T. tabaci-Mediated Transmission

Laboratory Experiment

A total of 472 plants were collected at the end of the experiment with 24 to 40 plants per cultivar, except for ‘Medeo’, ‘Calibra’, ‘Mesquite’ and ‘Yankee’ that had 18 to 23 plants. Across all cultivars, only 8.9% of the plants tested were infected with IYSV, as shown by DAS-ELISA. The percentage of plants infected ranged from 2.9 to 25% (Table 2) and there were no significant (χ2 = 17.27; df = 16; P = 0.3685) differences in the percentage of IYSV-infected plants among the T. tabaci-susceptible and resistant cultivars tested. These results indicated the absence of an association between resistance to onion thrips and their response to IYSV following T. tabaci-mediated transmission.

Field Experiment

In the field, 579 plants were tested with 28 to 40 plants per cultivar except for ‘Medeo’ that had 24 plants tested. Across all cultivars, the average percentage of infected plants was 52.3%. The percentage of plants infected with IYSV varied from 36.7 to 69.7% (Table 2) and there were no significant differences (χ2 = 16.83; df = 16; P = 0.3967) in infection levels among T. tabaci-susceptible and resistant cultivars. As expected, 2 susceptible checks ‘Nebula’ and ‘Yankee’ had significantly (F = 29.73; df = 16; P < 0.001) more T. tabaci larvae than the other cultivars (Table 2). These results confirmed the absence of an association between resistance to T. tabaci in onion cultivars and their response to IYSV following T. tabaci-mediated transmission; thus confirming previous field reports (Diaz-Montano et al. 2010; du Toit & Pelter 2005). In addition, there was a low correlation between IYSV infection levels and the number of larvae per cultivar (r = 0.452, P < 0.0688).





In this study, we tested the reaction of T. tabaci-resistant onion cultivars to IYSV in the field and in the laboratory by detecting the presence of IYSV by DAS-ELISA. Without a field component, the effects of multiple inoculation events, high vector pressure, inoculations across multiple plant stages, non-preference, etc. may not be considered. In the present study the correlation between laboratory and field IYSV infection levels was very low (r = -0.279, P < 0.267), indicating that there was not a strong pattern of IYSV infection using these 2 different experimental procedures. The lower infection rates in the laboratory suggest that initial screenings for detecting IYSV in a laboratory should not replace initial screening for IYSV detection in the field. However, differences of IYSV infection levels between our laboratory and field tests may also be due to the fixed number of T. tabaci used and confined in each pot in the laboratory compared with the field experiment, where unknown numbers and possibly more viruliferous T. tabaci may have landed on plants when pots were left uncovered.

In the present study, all cultivars became infected with IYSV in both lab and field experiments and this agrees with results from past studies, where more than 40 onion cultivars were tested for the presence of IYSV, and cultivars resistant to T. tabaci had high levels of IYSV incidence or vice versa from year to year or location to location (Diaz-Montano et al. 2010).

In the field experiment, the thrips-susceptible cultivars, ‘Nebula’ and ‘Yankee’, had 63.2 and 56.8% IYSV infection levels, respectively. However, there were no significant differences in IYSV levels between these thrips-susceptible and thrips-resistant cultivars, suggesting that cultivars resistant to T. tabaci are not necessarily free of the virus and vice versa; thus confirming previous studies in which several onion cultivars were tested for IYSV (Diaz-Montano et al. 2010; du Toit and Pelter 2005). This result is also explained by the low correlation (r = 0.452) found between IYSV infection levels and the number of larvae in the field.

Diaz-Montano et al. (2010) observed that visual symptoms of IYSV were mild to absent in onion fields in New York and usually appeared at the end of the season, which suggested that reductions in plant and bulb size were due to T. tabaci feeding rather than IYSV. This agrees with studies by Hsu et al. (2010) that revealed a positive correlation between high populations of T. tabaci adults in onion fields at the end of the season and high levels of IYSV, but no evident yield reduction by IYSV. In New York, IYSV was first found in 2006 (Hoepting et al. 2007). Diaz-Montano et al. (2010) suggested that yield losses in New York might be devastating if IYSV infected onions earlier in the season, and in that study the average percentages of IYSV-infected plants in the field infected were 11 and 40% in 2007 and 2008, respectively. In this study (2009), younger onion plants were exposed to T. tabaci populations only for 3 wk in the field, and yet all the cultivars became infected with IYSV with the average percentage of plants infected being 52% (Table 2). This infection rate, or a higher one caused by a longer infection period on young plants, would likely have deleterious effects on yield.

Our results and those published in the literature have not found any onion cultivar to be resistant to IYSV, nor any onion cultivar to be free of the virus after exposing many cultivars to viruliferous T. tabaci. Because host resistance to the virus has not been found, efforts to control IYSV should focus on a combination of control or management strategies, including sanitation practices, such as elimination of volunteer onions and planting of transplants free of T. tabaci and the virus, selection of cultivars resistant to T. tabaci, crop rotation and T. tabaci control with insecticides.

There have been several studies on onion resistance to T. tabaci as summarized by Diaz-Montano et al. (2011b); however, the traits responsible for resistance have not been sufficiently well characterized for incorporation into a breeding program. However, our recent studies have identified some T. tabaci-resistant cultivars, and it appears that such resistance is associated with leaf color (Diaz-Montano et al. 2010). We have demonstrated that these cultivars possess strong antixenosis as a category of resistance to T. tabaci, and that leaf color may play an important role in that resistance (Diaz-Montano 2011a). These findings of cultivars with strong antixenosis to T. tabaci could have promise for IYSV management because plant traits may prevent the vector from colonizing these plants. However, as shown in this study and others (du Toit & Pelter 2005; Diaz-Montano et al. 2010) the situation is more complex because none of the cultivars examined showed any resistance to IYSV infection. Therefore, genetically engineering onions resistant to IYSV may be a more promising alternative for IYSV management. This strategy has proven extremely effective in controlling Papaya ringspot virus in papaya and several viruses in summer squash (Shelton et al. 2008).


We thank Christy Hoepting (Cornell), Jän Van Der Heide (Bejo Seeds), Howard Schwartz and Michael Bartolo (CSU) and Chris Cramer (NMSU) for providing seeds; Phillip Griffiths, Akiko Seto, Françoise Vermeylen, Mao Chen, Mei Cheung, Hilda Collins, Anuar Morales, Xiaoxia Liu, Yunhe Li, Patricia Marsella-Herrick, Aracely Ospina, Rosemary Cox, Eric Rockefeller, Alvaro Romero and Derek Battin for helping in different aspects of this study. This research was partially funded by the New York State Onion Research and Development Program and the New York Farm Viability Initiative.



T. N. Ananthakrishnan 1973. Thrips: biology and control. MacMillan, India. 120 pp. Google Scholar


S. F. Bailey 1938. Thrips of economic importance in California. Univ. California, Coll. Agric., Agric. Exp. Stn. Cir. 346. Google Scholar


J. W. Boodley , and R. Sheldrake 1977. Cornell peat-lite mixes for commercial plant growing. Cornell Univ. Coop. Ext. Div. Info. Bull. 43. Google Scholar


K. S. Brar , A. S. Sidhu , and M. L. Chadha 1993. Screening onion varieties for resistance to Thrips tabaci Lind, and Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). J. Insect Sci. 6: 123–124. Google Scholar


M. F. Clark , and A. N. Adams 1977. Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of plant viruses. J. Gen. Virol. 34: 475–483. Google Scholar


D. L. Coudriet , A. N. Kishaba , J. D. McCreight , and G. W. Bohn 1979. Varietal resistance in onions to thrips. J. Econ. Entomol. 72: 614–615. Google Scholar


J. Diaz-Montano 2011a. Resistance to onion thrips (Thrips tabaci Lindeman) and incidence of Iris yellow spot virus in onions., Ph. D. Thesis, Cornell Univ. Ithaca, New York. 150 pp. Google Scholar


J. Diaz-Montano , M. Fuchs , B. A. Nault , and A. M. Shelton 2010. Evaluation of onion cultivars for resistance to onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and Iris yellow spot virus. J. Econ. Entomol. 103: 925– 937. Google Scholar


J. Diaz-Montano , M. Fuchs , B. A. Nault , J. Fail , and A. M. Shelton 2011b. Onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae): A global pest of increasing concern in onion. J. Econ. Entomol. 104: 1–13. Google Scholar


L. J. Du Toit , and G. Q. Pelter 2005. Susceptibility of storage onion cultivars to iris yellow spot in the Columbia Basin of Washington, 2004. Biol. Cultural Tests. 20: V006. Google Scholar


F. Fournier , G. Boivin , and R. K. Stewart 1995. Effect of Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on yellow onion yields and economic thresholds for its management. J. Econ. Entomol. 88: 1401–1407. Google Scholar


D. H. Gent , H. R. Schwartz , and R. Khosla 2004. Distribution and incidence of Iris yellow spot virus in Colorado and its relation to onion plant population and yield. Plant Dis. 88: 446–452. Google Scholar


D. H. Gent , L. J. Du Toit , S. F. Fichtner , S. K. Mohan , H. R. Pappu , and H. F. Schwartz 2006. Iris yellow spot virus: an emerging threat to onion bulb and seed production. Plant Dis. 90: 1468–1480. Google Scholar


A. A. A. E. Ghabn 1948. Contribution to the knowledge of the biology of Thrips tabaci Lind. in Egypt. Bull. Soc. Fouad. I Ent. 32: 123–174. Google Scholar


J. M. Hall , K. Mohan , E. A. Knott , and J. W. Moyer 1993. Tospoviruses associated with scape blight of onion (Allium cepa) seed crops in Idaho. Plant Dis. 77: 952. Google Scholar


G. A. Herron , T. M. James , and J. H. Mo 2008. Australian populations of onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), are resistant to some insecticides used for their control. Australian J. Entomol. 47: 361–364. Google Scholar


C. A. Hoepting , H. F. Schwartz , and H. R. Pappu 2007. First report of Iris yellow spot virus on onion in New York. Plant Dis. 91: 327. Google Scholar


C. L. Hsu , C. A. Hoepting , M. Fuchs , A. M. Shelton , and B. A. Nault 2010. Temporal dynamics of Iris yellow spot virus and its vector, Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), in seeded and transplanted onion fields. Environ. Entomol. 39: 266–277. Google Scholar


K. Hudák , and B. Pénzes 2004. Factors influencing the population of the onion thrips on onion. Acta Phytopathol. Entomol. Hungarica. 39: 193–197. Google Scholar


H. A. Jones , S. F. Bailey , and S. L. Emsweller 1934. Thrips resistance in the onion. Hilgardia. 8: 215–232. Google Scholar


H. A. Jones , S. F. Bailey , and S. L. Emsweller 1935. Field studies of Thrips tabaci Lind, with special reference to resistance in onions. J. Econ. Entomol. 28: 678–680. Google Scholar


D. M. Kendall , and J. L. Capinera 1987. Susceptibility of onion growth stages to onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) damage and mechanical defoliation. Environ. Entomol. 16: 859–863. Google Scholar


A. Kritzman , M. Lampel , B. Raccah , and A. Gera 2001. Distribution and transmission of Iris yellow spot virus. Plant Dis. 85: 838–842. Google Scholar


B. S. Lall , and L. M. Singh 1968. Biology and control of the onion thrips in India. J. Econ. Entomol. 61: 676–679. Google Scholar


T. Lewis 1997. Pest thrips in perspective, pp. 1–13 In T. Lewis [ed.], Thrips as crop pests. CAB International, New York, New York. 740 pp. Google Scholar


V. Loges , M.A. Lemos , L. V. Resende , D. Menezes , J. A. Candeia , and V. F. Santos 2004a. Correlações entre caracteres agronômicos associados à resistência a tripes em cebola. Hortic. Brasileira. 22: 624–627. Google Scholar


V. Loges , M.A. Lemos , L. V. Resende , D. Menezes , J. A. Candeia , and V. F. Santos 2004b. Resistência de cultivares e híbridos de cebola a tripes. Hortic. Brasileira. 22: 222–225. Google Scholar


J. K. MacIntyre Allen , C. D. Scott-Dupree , J. H. Tolman , and C. R. Harris 2005. Resistance of Thrips tabaci to pyrethroid and organophosphorus insecticides in Ontario, Canada. Pest Manag. Sci. 61: 809–815. Google Scholar


N. A. Martin , P. J. Workman , and R. C. Butler 2003. Insecticide resistance in onion thrips (Thrips tabaci) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). New Zealand J. Crop Hort. 31: 99–106. Google Scholar


M. Morishita 2008. Pyrethroid-resistant onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), infesting persimmon fruit. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 43: 25–31. Google Scholar


G. D. Morison 1957. A review of British glasshouse Thysanoptera. Trans. Roy. Ent. Soc. London. 109: 467–520. Google Scholar


(NASS) NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS SERVICE. 2011. Vegetables 2010 summary. NASS, USDA ( Google Scholar


M. P. Parrella , and T. Lewis 1997. Integrated pest management (IPM) in field crops, pp. 595–614 In T. Lewis [ed.], Thrips as crop pests. CAB International, New York, NY. 740 pp. Google Scholar


A. P. Patil , R. N. Nawale , D. S. Ajri , and P. R. Moholkar 1988. Field screening of onion cultivars for their reaction to thrips. Indian Cocoa, Arecanut Spices J. 12: 10–11. Google Scholar


D. B. Pawar , U. N. Mote , P. N. Kale , and D. S. Ajri 1987. Identification of resistant sources for thrips in onion. Curr. Res. Report. 3: 115–117. Google Scholar


L. Pozzer , T. Nagata , Lima; M. I ., E. W. Kitajima , R. De O. Resende , and A. C. De Avila 1994. “Sapeca”: An onion disease in the Sub-Médio São Francisco region, Brazil, is caused by a tospovirus with a serologically distinct nucleocapsid protein. Fitopatol. Brasileira. 19: 321. Google Scholar


L. Pozzer , I. C. Bezerra , R. Kormelink , M. Prins , D. Peters , R. De O. Resende , and A. C. De Ávila 1999. Characterization of a tospovirus isolate of iris yellow spot virus associated with a disease in onion fields in Brazil. Plant Dis. 83: 345–350. Google Scholar


A. Rueda , F. R. Badenes-Perez , and A. M. Shelton 2007. Developing economic thresholds for onion thrips in Honduras. Crop Prot. 26: 1099–1107. Google Scholar


SAS INSTITUTE. 2003. SAS/STAT User's Guide, version 9.1.3. SAS institute, Cary, NC. Google Scholar


A. M. Shelton , B. A. Nault , J. Plate , and J. Z. Zhao 2003. Regional and temporal variation in susceptibility to 1-Cyhalothrin in onion thrips, Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in onion fields in New York. J. Econ. Entomol. 96: 1843–1848. Google Scholar


A. M. Shelton , J. Z. Zhao , B. A. Nault , J. Plate , F. R. Musser , and E. Larentzaki 2006. Patterns of insecticide resistance in onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in onion fields in New York. J. Econ. Entomol. 99: 1798–1804. Google Scholar


A. M. Shelton , M. Fuchs , and F. Shotkowski 2008. Transgenic vegetables and fruits for control of insect and insect-vectored pathogens, pp. 249–272, In J. Romeis , A. M. Shelton and G. G. Kennedy [eds.], Integration of insect-resistant genetically modified crops within IPM programs. Springer, The Netherlands. 441 pp. Google Scholar


S. K. Verma 1966. Studies on the host preference of the onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman to the varieties of onion. Indian J. Entomol. 28: 396–-398. Google Scholar


M. M. Waiganjo , J. M. Mueke , and L. M. Gitonga 2008. Susceptible onion growth stages for selective and economic protection from onion thrips infestation, pp. 193–200 In R. K Prange and S. D. Bishop [eds.], Proc. Symp. Sustainability through Integrated and Organic Horticulture. Int. Symp. Int. Soc. Hort. Sci. (ISHS), 13–19 August 2006, Seoul, Korea. Publ. Acta Horticulturae. 767. Int. Soc. Hort. Sci., Leuven, Belgium. Google Scholar


A. E. Whitfield , D. E. Ullman , and T. L. German 2005. Tospovirus-Thrips Interactions. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 43: 459–489. Google Scholar
John Diaz-Montano, Marc Fuchs, Brian A. Nault, and Anthony M. Shelton "Resistance to Onion Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in OnionCultivars does not Prevent Infection by Iris Yellow SpotVirus Following Vector-Mediated Transmission," Florida Entomologist 95(1), 156-161, (1 March 2012).
Published: 1 March 2012

Allium cepa
onion resistance
Thrips tabaci
Get copyright permission
Back to Top