Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2012 First Record of an Encyrtid Wasp (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) as a True Primary Parasitoid of Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Numerous cases of associations of encyrtid wasps with ants have already been reported. In the majority of these cases, however, wasps are associated only indirectly with ants (interference associations) through primary parasitism of the trophobionts (Coccoidea), which are exploited and protected by ants. Suspected direct parasitism cases are unusual and no direct attack of encyrtids on ants has ever been demonstrated. Here we provide both a revised list of all known cases of associations between encyrtid wasps and ants, and a report of the first record of a true primary encyrtid parasitoid of ants. Of two colonies of the arboreal ponerine ant, Pachycondyla goeldii (Forel), examined from French Guiana, one had 3 pupae parasitized by males and females of a gregarious, minute encyrtid wasp species, identified as Blanchardiscus pollux Noyes, and 2 other cocoons presented evidence of pararasitism. This first host record for the genus Blanchardiscus, which has always been placed near other genera that parasitize scale-insects, supports a hypothesis of a shift from a myrmecophilous host to an ant host. Our findings increase to 9 the number of parasitoid wasp families known to attack ants as primary hosts. A closer examination of other arboreal ants, particularly those involved in ant-garden building and nest weaving, will certainly yield new ant-parasitoid associations.

Records of associations with ants involving hymenopteran wasp parasitoids include more than 500 wasp species, but only a fraction unambiguously pertains to true parasitoids (Lachaud & Pérez-Lachaud 2012). Parasitoid wasps known to attack adult ants or their brood belong to 8 families: Diapriidae (Diaprioidea); Chalcididae, Eucharitidae, Eulophidae, Eurytomidae and Perilampidae (Chalcidoidea); Braconidae and Ichneumonidae (Ichneumonoidea) (Wilson 1971; Kistner 1982; Hölldobler & Wilson 1990; Schmid-Hempel 1998; Lachaud & Pérez-Lachaud 2012). The Eucharitidae sensu stricto is the only group whose known hosts are exclusively larval ants (Heraty 2002).

Here we describe the first known case of true primary parasitism of a species of ant by an encyrtid wasp (Chalcidoidea: Encyrtidae). Our results are based on ant specimens collected in 2002 in the course of investigations on the eucharitid fauna associated with formicids in French Guiana. An exhaustive recent review of all the material preserved in alcohol, focusing on eucharitid wasps associated with poneromorph ants (Lachaud et al. 2012), fortuitously allowed us to detect new examples of hymenopteran parasitoids of ants, other than eucharitids. Moreover, a survey of the literature over the last 100 years allowed us to list both all the recorded cases of associations between encyrtid wasps and ants and the exact nature of their known relationships.

MATERIALS and METHODS

Two nests of the arboreal ant-garden species, Pachycondyla goeldii (Forel) (Formicidae: Ponerinae), were collected on 12 Nov 2002 in French Guiana, at Km 13 along the road leading to the Hydroelectric complex at Petit Saut, Sinnamary (N 05° 07′ 25.3″ W 52° 57′ 16.7″). Pachycondyla goeldii is a monogynous, polydomous ponerine species (Denis et al. 2006) that colonizes pioneer vegetal formations where plants are characterized by a rapid, continuous growth and a high production of leaves and soft wood (Corbara & Dejean 1996; Dejean et al. 2000b). Founding queens and first generation workers initiate their own ant garden by building a cardboard-like structure into which epiphyte seeds are integrated. Following the growth of the epiphyte, the colony establishes its nest within the root system (Corbara & Dejean 1996; Orivel et al. 1998). Ant gardens were transported to the laboratory, and their content preserved in alcohol for later examination.

The presence and number of ant dealate females, alate females, males, workers, cocoons, and larvae, as well as the presence of any adult myrmecophile (especially eucharitid parasitoids), were recorded. At first, the contents of cocoons preserved in alcohol were superficially examined while backlit to check for the presence of any ectoparasitoid. In particular, we looked for wasp remains (exuvia) within empty ant cocoons denoting previous parasitoid emergence and for the presence of scars upon ant larvae resulting from unsuccessful attacks of eucharitid first instar larvae. During June 2011, preserved material was revised again: all of the cocoons were dissected under a stereomicroscope and ant pupae were this time thoroughly checked for the presence of both ecto- and endoparasitoids or for any evidence of parasitism. We discovered some encyrtids, some of these were slide-mounted and identified by direct comparison with type material of the relevant species. Voucher specimens were deposited in the Natural History Museum, London, England and in the Arthropod collection of El Colegio de la Frontera Sur-Chetumal, Quintana Roo, Mexico.

RESULTS

The first nest collected was composed of 1 queen, 77 workers, 4 pupae, 2 larvae, and several eggs. The second nest contained no queen, 5 alate females, 208 workers, 67 pupae (of which 16 large pupae, presumably winged sexuals), and neither larvae nor eggs. Initial cursory inspection of the brood, in 2002, showed no signs of external attack.

During the later examination, in 2011, it was noted that the color of the gaster of some ant pupae looked slightly different and, in one instance, very small dark points were visible through the cuticle. In this last case, dissection showed the presence of already pigmented developing individuals of a gregarious, very minute (body length < 1 mm) endoparasitoid wasp. Five ant pupae from nest no. 2 were found to be parasitized. One worker pupa contained 15 almost fully developed and pigmented adult wasps (8 females, 7 males). A second worker pupa contained 11 wasp pupae (at that developmental stage sex could not be determined, see Fig. 1), and a female (queen) pupa contained 4 white wasp larvae-prepupae. Two other queen pupae had a hole in their gaster, from which parasitoids had previously emerged (Fig. 1).

The wasp was identified as Blanchardiscus pollux Noyes (Chalcidoidea: Encyrtidae: Encyrtinae). Only 2 species of the genus Blanchardiscus de Santis are currently known: B. scutellaris De Santis and B. pollux. Blanchardiscus scutellaris was described from a female collected with sweep net upon vegetation in Tucuman, Argentina (De Santis 1964), and has been reported from Brazil (Noyes 1980), whereas B. pollux is known from both the male and the female and was collected from Costa Rica and Belize (Noyes 2004). The biology of both species was heretofore unknown and no host data were available for any of the two species.

Fig. 1.

Cocoon of a Pachycondyla goeldii queen with a single emergence hole (white arrow) chewed by the encyrtid parasitoids in the apical, ventral portion of the ant gaster. A Blanchardiscus pollux pupa (black arrow) is also shown for comparison.

f01_1066.jpg

According to our observations, B. pollux is a gregarious endoparasitoid of P. goeldii pupae. Wasp larvae pupate inside the ant host pupae, which are protected by a cocoon. Developing wasps were found in the dorsal anterior portion of the gaster of the ant host, near the petiole. They were grouped in a compact mass, and for the 15 nearly adult specimens whose sexual gender could be assessed, the wings were somewhat distorted. Only a small portion of the ant's gaster was occupied by the parasitoids: B. pollux adults measure less than 1 mm, whereas P. goeldii workers measure 9–12 mm. At emergence, adult wasps chew a hole (1 mm in diam), in the host cuticle and through the host cocoon. A single emergence hole was observed in the apical, ventral portion of the gaster, near the meconium (Fig. 1), in the 2 queen pupae from which wasps had already emerged. Both worker and queen pupae of P. goeldii were parasitized and both male and female wasps emerged from the same host. It is unknown whether more than a single generation occurs inside the ant nest or whether adults leave the host nest to mate and disperse, but the latter seems more likely because both males and females were collected outside ant nests (Noyes 2004). However, even if no free adult wasp was found within both P. goeldii nests, they might have passed unnoticed when nests were collected.

DISCUSSION

Encyrtid wasps are widespread and common throughout the world. The family currently includes more than 480 genera and 4500 species and is one of the most important chalcidoid families for biological control of insect pests (Noyes & Hayat 1994; Noyes 2000, 2012; Trjapitzin 2008). Though a few species are egg predators (e.g. in Microterys), most encyrtids are endoparasitoids of insects and arachnids, including other hymenopteran parasitoids. About half of all encyrtids whose host is known are parasitic upon Coccoidea (Noyes 2012). Two subfamilies are recognized: the Tetracneminae with 111 genera and 848 species, and the Encyrtinae with 370 genera and 3700 species (Trjapitzin 1973a, 1973b; Noyes 2012).

Numerous encyrtids have been recorded associated with ants belonging to 3 subfamilies (Dolichoderinae, Formicinae, and Myrmicinae). However, almost all these records referred to indirect associations with ants (i.e. interference, see Table 1) through primary parasitism of the trophobionts that ants tend (e.g. Bartlett 1961; Cudjoe et al. 1993; Hübner & Völkl 1996; González-Hernández et al. 1999; Barzman & Daane 2001; Mgocheki & Addison 2009). These associations are more numerous in Encyrtinae, with 27 species from 17 genera involved in 45 associations with ants, than in Tetracneminae, with 15 species from 8 genera involved in 27 associations. However, such a difference in the number of reported associations likely reflects species richness within each subfamily, because there are more encyrtine than tetracmine species.

TABLE 1.

LIST OF ENCYRTID WASPS KNOWN TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH ANTS, OF THEIR ANTS ASSOCIATES, AND OF THEIR PRIMARY HOSTS, and NATURE OF THE ASSOCIATION.

t01a_1066.gif

(CONTINUED)

t01b_1066.gif

(CONTINUED)

t01c_1066.gif

(CONTINUED)

t01d_1066.gif

Various encyrtid species reported in interference association with ants (Table 1) have a very wide primary host range, and some are even hyperparasitoids: e.g. Prionomitus mitratus is parasitic on a fairly wide range of psyllids, Prochiloneurus pulchellus is a hyperparasitoid of many species of mealybugs, and Syrphophagus aphidivorus is a hyperparasitoid of virtually any aphid that feeds on grasses or herbaceous vegetation. Likewise, in numerous genera (Aenasius, Anagyrus, Anicetus, Coccidoxenoides, Comperiella, Leptomastix, Ooencyrtus, Prochiloneurus, Syrphophagus, see Table 1), the indirect association with the ant is not specific and can even involve species from different ant subfamilies. However, in some genera, e.g. Ananusia, Encyrtus, Holcencyrtus, Metaphycus, Microterys, Prionomitus, and Tetracnemoidea (Table 1), more specific interferences with ants—at species or, at least, at subfamily level—can occur and could suggest some level of selection of the ant associates by the parasitoids.

A few cases of assumed direct associations involving encyrtids and ants have been reported (Table 1), but true primary parasitism has never been demonstrated before. An unidentified species of encyrtid was recorded from a refuse heap of Eciton burchellii (Westwood) (Rettenmeyer et al. 2011), but direct interaction with this ant host has not been observed and the encyrtid may have only been a prey. The 2 females of Taftia prodeniae Ashmead found by Roepke (1919) clanging to the antennae of Dolichoderus thoracicus (Fr. Smith) (referred to as D. bituberculatus Mayr) may have been phoretic rather than parasitic. Only Holcencyrtus wheeleri (Ashmead) (referred to as Pheidoloxenus wheeleri), found in nests of the myrmicine ants Pheidole tepicana Pergande (referred to as P. instabilis) (Wheeler 1907) and P. ceres Wheeler (referred to as P. ceres var. tepaneca Wheeler) (Mann 1914), seems to have symphilic relationships with its hosts and has been suspected of being “probably also entoparasitic on these ants or their progeny during its larval stages” (Wheeler 1910). Wheeler (1907) stated that this “exquisite little Chalcididruns about in the dense throng of Pheidole workers like one of their number. It is not easily detected, as it resembles the workers in its small size (1 mm) and in being subapterous or practically wingless”. In some occasions as many as 6 or 8 H. wheeleri have been observed in a single nest of P. tepicana (Wheeler 1907). It is worth noting that 2 related encyrtid species, Holcencyrtus osborni Timberlake and H. myrmicoides (Compere & Zinna), have been reared from mealybug hosts (e.g. Dysmicoccus boninsis (Kuwana), D. brevipes (Cockerell), Planococcus citri (Risso), Pseudococcus gahani (Green), Saccharicoccus sacchari (Cockerell), see Noyes & Hayat 1994; Noyes 2012) that are often associated with ants, and therefore association with ants might be fortuitous. Nevertheless, in the case of H. wheeleri, considering that it seems to be a regular myrmecophile in P. tepicana nests, that adults present subapterism, and that ant hosts are not associated with Aphididae or Coccidae (Wheeler 1907), such an association is unlikely to be only circumstancial; however, a primary parasitic relationship was never proved and the wasp developmental stages remained unknown. Therefore, our record of B. pollux from French Guiana reared from pupae of the neotropical ant P. goeldii constitutes both the first record of primary parasitism of ants for the Encyrtidae and the first case associating an encyrtid species with a ponerine ant. Our finding increases to 9 the number of parasitic wasp families that attack ants. As hypothesized by Huggert and Masner (1983) and Hanson et al. (1995), a possible evolutionary path to the parasitism of ants by hymenopterous parasitoids could have been through the occurence of a shift from the initial primary host—an ant symbiont—to the ant host through a gradual process of association and integration with the ant hosts. Such a hypothesis seems plausible for numerous families (Lachaud and Pérez-Lachaud 2012), and a supporting example has recently been proposed among eulophids for 2 Horismenus species associated with the weaver ant Camponotus sp. near textor (Hansson et al. 2011). Phylogenetically, Blanchardiscus is very probably near genera that include species known to parasitize scale-insects. Our record of B. pollux parasitizing ants may also support this hypothesis.

Little is known about the diversity of parasitoids of ants in general, though knowledge on this topic has significantly increased in the last two decades (Lachaud & Pérez-Lachaud 2012). Likewise, the hosts of most parasitic hymenopteran species already described are still unknown, especially those of rare or rarely collected species. Several recent reports (Hansson et al. 2011; Lachaud et al. 2012; Lachaud & Pérez-Lachaud 2012; Gates & Pérez-Lachaud 2012) have called attention to the diversity of parasitoids that attack ants, particularly in the case of arboreal ant species. For example, hymenopterous myrmecophiles associated with the neotropical weaver ant Camponotus sp. near textor, another arboreal ant, include 2 species of Eucharitidae, 2 of Eulophidae, and 1 of Eurytomidae (Hansson et al. 2011; Gates & Pérez-Lachaud 2012; Pérez-Lachaud & Lachaud, unpublished data). Those findings and the present record of a new family of parasitic wasps attacking ants inhabiting ant-gardens strongly suggest that arboreal ant nests may constitute a hot spot of diversity that has little been studied. As highlighted by Schmid-Hempel (1998) and Lachaud & Pérez-Lachaud (2012), parasitic wasps associated with ants as the primary host are diverse, but most associations still await discovery.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank all the team of the Laboratoire Environnement at Petit Saut (HYDRECO) for both logistic help and assistance with local accommodation. We are also grateful to Jérôme Orivel (ECOFOG, French Guiana) for collecting the ants, and to Enrique Ruíz Cancino (Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Mexico) for providing bibliographic information. This research was partially supported by a grant from the French Ministère de l'Écologie et du Développement Durable (Program “Recherche de procédés limitant l'activité de fourmis tropicales d'importance écologique et économique”).

REFERENCES CITED

1.

B. R. Bartlett 1961. The influence of ants upon parasites, predators, and scale insects. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 54:543–551. Google Scholar

2.

M. S. Barzman , and K. M. Daane 2001. Host-handling behaviours in parasitoids of the black scale: a case for ant-mediated evolution. J. Anim. Ecol. 70: 237–247. Google Scholar

3.

J. M. Campos , M. T. Martínez-Ferrer , and V. Forés 2006. Parasitism disruption by ants of Anagyrus pseudococci (Girault) and Leptomastix dactylopii Howard (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), two parasitoids of the citrus mealybug Planococcus citri (Risso) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae), pp. 33–46. In F. Garcia-Mari [ed.], Integrated Control in Citrus Fruit Crops. Proceedings of the Meeting of the International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants, west palearctic regional section Bulletin 29. Google Scholar

4.

J. M. Chantos 2007. Dynamics of Tritrophic Interactions Between Solenopsis invicta, Antonina graminis, and Neodusmetia sangwani: Do Fire Ants Negatively Impact the Success of a Biological Control System? M.Sc. Dissertation, Texas A&M University. Google Scholar

5.

B. Corbara , and A. Dejean 1996. Arboreal nest building and ant-garden initiation by a ponerine ant. Natur wissenschaften 83: 227–230. Google Scholar

6.

A. R. Cudjoe , P. Neuenschwander , and M. J. W. Copland 1993. Interference by ants in biological control of the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Ghana. Bull. Entomol. Res. 83: 15–22. Google Scholar

7.

K. M. Daane , K. R. Sime , J. Fallon , and M. L. Cooper 2007. Impacts of Argentine ants on mealybugs and their natural enemies in California's coastal vineyards. Ecol. Entomol. 32: 583–596. Google Scholar

8.

E. Dahms , and G. Gordh 1997. A review of the genera of Australian Encyrtidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) described from Australia by A.A. Girault with a checklist of included species. Memoirs on Entomology, International 9: 1–518. Google Scholar

9.

A. Dejean , T. Bourgoin , and J. Orivel 2000a. Ant defense of Euphyonarthex phyllostoma (Homoptera: Tettigometridae) during trophobiotic associations. Biotropica 32: 112–119. Google Scholar

10.

A. Dejean , B. Corbara , J. Orivel , R. R. Snelling , J. H. C. Delabie , and M. Belin-Depoux 2000b. The importance of ant gardens in the pioneer vegetal formations of French Guiana (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 35: 425–439. Google Scholar

11.

D. Denis , J. Orivel , R. R. Hora , S. Chameron , and D. Fresneau 2006. First record of polydomy in a monogynous ponerine ant: a means to allow emigration between Pachycondyla goeldii nests. J. Insect Behav. 19: 279–291. Google Scholar

12.

S. E. Flanders 1945. Coincident infestations of Aonidiella citrina and Coccus hesperidum, a result of ant activity. J. Econ. Entomol. 38: 711–712. Google Scholar

13.

M. W. Gates , and G. Pérez-Lachaud 2012. Description of Camponotophilus delvarei, gen. n. and sp. n. (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Eurytomidae), with discussion of diagnostic characters. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Washington 114: 111–124. Google Scholar

14.

M. Gibernau , and A. Dejean 2001. Ant protection of a heteropteran trophobiont against a parasitoid wasp. Oecologia 126: 53–57. Google Scholar

15.

H. González-Hernández , M. W. Johnson , and N. J. Reimer 1999. Impact of Pheidole megacephala (F.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on the biological control of Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Biol. Control 15: 145–152. Google Scholar

16.

G. Gordh , and V. A. Trjapitzin 1979. Review of the genera of parasitic Hymenoptera of the tribe Chrysoplatycerini (Hymenoptera, Encyrtidae) with description of a new myrmecophilous genus from Tasmania. Trud. Zool. Instit. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Leningrad 82: 103–112. Google Scholar

17.

E. Guerrieri , and J. S. Noyes 2002. An unusual genus and species of Encyrtidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) from Australia reared from soft scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccidae). J. Nat. Hist. 36: 443–448. Google Scholar

18.

P. E. Hanson , M. J. West-Eberhard , and I. D. Gauld 1995. Interspecific interactions of nesting Hymenoptera, pp. 76–88. In P. E. Hanson and I. D. Gauld [eds.], The Hymenoptera of Costa Rica. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google Scholar

19.

C. Hansson , J.-P. Lachaud , and G. Pérez-Lachaud 2011. Entedoninae wasps (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Eulophidae) associated with ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in tropical America, with new species and notes on their biology. ZooKeys 134: 65–82. Google Scholar

20.

J. M. Heraty 2002. A revision of the genera of Eucharitidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of the world. Mem. Amer. Entomol. Inst. 68: 1–367. Google Scholar

21.

B. Hölldobler , and E. O. Wilson 1990. The Ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Google Scholar

22.

G. Hübner , and W. Völkl 1996. Behavioral strategies of aphid hyperparasitoids to escape aggression by honeydew-collecting ants. J. Insect Behav. 9: 143–157. Google Scholar

23.

L. Huggert , and L. Masner 1983. A review of myrmecophilic-symphilic diapriid wasps in the Holartic realm, with descriptions of new taxa and a key to genera (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea: Diapriidae). Contrib. Am. Entomol. Inst. 20: 63–89. Google Scholar

24.

T. Itioka , and T. Inoue 1996a. Density-dependent ant attendance and its effects on the parasitism of a honeydew-producing scale insect, Ceroplastes rubens. Oecologia 106: 448–454. Google Scholar

25.

T. Itioka , and T. Inoue 1996b. The consequences of antattendance to the biological control of the red wax scale insect Ceroplastes rubens by Anicetus beneficus. J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 609–618. Google Scholar

26.

D. G. James , M. M. Stevens , K. J. O'Malley , and R. J. Faulder 1999. Ant foraging reduces the abundance of beneficial and incidental arthropods in citrus canopies. Biol. Control 14: 121–126. Google Scholar

27.

D. H. Kistner 1982. The social insects’ bestiary, pp. 1–244. In H. R. Hermann [ed.], Social Insects, vol. 3. Academic Press, New York. Google Scholar

28.

S. M. E. Krull , and T. Basedow 2005. Evaluation of the biological control of the pink wax scale Ceroplastes rubens Maskell (Hom., Coccidae) with the introduced parasitoid Anicetus beneficus Ishii & Yasumatsu (Hym., Encyrtidae) in the Central province of Papua New Guinea. J. Appl. Entomol. 129: 323–329. Google Scholar

29.

J.-P. Lachaud , P. Cerdan , and G. Pérez-Lachaud 2012. Poneromorph ants associated with parasitoid wasps of the genus Kapala Cameron (Hymenoptera: Eucharitidae) in French Guiana. Psyche 2012: 1–6, doi: 10.1155/2012/393486Google Scholar

30.

J.-P. Lachaud , and G. Pérez-Lachaud 2012. Diversity of species and behavior of hymenopteran parasitoids of ants: a review. Psyche 2012: 1–24, doi: 10.1155/2012/134746Google Scholar

31.

H. Liere , and I. Perfecto 2008. Cheating on a mutualism: indirect benefits of ant attendance to a coccidophagous coccinellid. Environ. Entomol. 37: 143–149. Google Scholar

32.

W. M. Mann 1914. Some myrmecophilous insects from Mexico. Psyche 21: 171–184. Google Scholar

33.

M. T. Martínez-Ferrer , E. E. Grafton-Cardwell , and H. H. Shorey 2003. Disruption of parasitism of the California red scale (Homoptera: Diaspididae) by three ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Biol. Control 26: 279–286. Google Scholar

34.

N. Mgocheki , and P. Addison 2009. Interference of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) with biological control of the vine mealybug Planococcus ficus (Signoret) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Biol. Control 49: 180–185. Google Scholar

35.

J. R. Nechols , and T. F. Seibert 1985. Biological control of the spherical mealybug, Nipaecoccus vastator (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae): assessment by ant exclusion. Environ. Entomol. 14: 45–47. Google Scholar

36.

H. Novak 1994. The influence of ant attendance on larval parasitism in hawthorn psyllids (Homoptera: Psyllidae). Oecologia 99: 72–78. Google Scholar

37.

J. S. Noyes 2000. Encyrtidae of Costa Rica (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea), 1. The subfamily Tetracneminae, parasitoids of mealybugs (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Mem. Amer. Entomol. Inst. 62: 1–355. Google Scholar

38.

J. S. Noyes 2004. Encyrtidae of Costa Rica (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea), 2. Metaphycus and related genera, parasitoids of scale insects (Coccoidea) and whiteflies (Aleyrodidae). Mem. Amer. Entomol. Inst. 73: 1–459. Google Scholar

39.

J. S. Noyes 2012. Universal Chalcidoidea Database.  http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/research/ projects/chalcidoids/encyrtidae.html, accessed on May 29th, 2012. Google Scholar

40.

J. S. Noyes , and M. Hayat 1994. Oriental Mealybug Parasitoids of the Anagyrini (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). CAB International, Wallingford, UK. Google Scholar

41.

J. Orivel , A. Dejean , and C. Errard 1998. Active role of two ponerine ants in the elaboration of ant gardens. Biotropica 30: 487–491. Google Scholar

42.

O. Peck 1963. A catalogue of the Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Can. Entomol. (Suppl.) 30: 1–1092. Google Scholar

43.

C. W. Rettenmeyer , M. E. Rettenmeyer , J. Joseph , and S. M. Berghoff 2011. The largest animal association centered on one species: the army ant Eciton burchellii and its more than 300 associates. Insect. Soc. 58: 281–292, Supplemental material (doi:  10.1007/s00040-010-0128-8). Google Scholar

44.

W. Roepke 1919. Some additional remarks concerning Mr. Girault's descriptions of new Javanese chalcid flies. Treubia 1: 60. Google Scholar

45.

D. Sanders , and F. J. F. Van Veen , 2010. The impact of an ant-aphid mutualism on the functional composition of the secondary parasitoid community. Ecol. Entomol. 35: 704–710. Google Scholar

46.

L. De Santis 1963. Encirtidos de la República Argentina (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). An. Com. Inv. Cient. Prov. Bs. As. Gob. 4: 9–422. Google Scholar

47.

P. Schmid-Hempel 1998. Parasites in Social Insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. Google Scholar

48.

E. S. Sugonyaev 1996a. A new species of chalcid wasp of the genus Astymachus Howard from Vietnam (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea: Encyrtidae). Zoosyst. Ross. 5: 193–195. Google Scholar

49.

E. S. Sugonyaev 1996b. Chalcid wasps (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea) parasites of soft scales (Coccinea, Coccidae) in Vietnam. IV New species of the genus Microterys Thomson and Metaphycus Mercet (Encyrtidae), partly inhabiting ants' nests, with morphological notes. Entomol. Obozr. 75: 417–425. Google Scholar

50.

E. S. Sugonyaev 1998. Chalcid wasps (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea) parasites of soft scales (Homoptera, Coccidae) in Vietnam. VI. A new species of the genus Encyrtus Latreille (Hymenoptera, Encyrtidae) inhabitant of ant nests. Entomol. Obozr. 77: 497– 501. Google Scholar

51.

E. S. Sugonyaev 1999. Chalcid wasps (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea) parasites of soft scales (Homoptera, Coccidae) in Vietnam. VII. A new peculiar species of the genus Encyrtus Latr. (Encyrtidae) inhabiting ants’ nests (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Entomol. Obozr. 78: 453–456. Google Scholar

52.

K. E. Tollerup 2007. Managing Populations of the Vine Mealybug, Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), in Coachella Valley Vineyards Using Inundative Releases of the Parasitoid, Anagyrus pseudococci (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), and Baits to Control the Field Ant, Formica perpilosa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ph. D Dissertation, University of California, Riverside. Google Scholar

53.

V. A. Trjapitzin 1973a. The classification of parasitic Hymenoptera of the family Encyrtidae (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea). Part I. Survey of the systems of classification. The subfamily Tetracneminae Howard, 1892. Entomol. Rev. 52: 118–125. Google Scholar

54.

V. A. Trjapitzin 1973B. Classification of the parasitic Hymenoptera of the family Encyrtidae. Part II. Subfamily Encyrtinae Walker, 1837. Entomol. Rev. 52: 287–295. Google Scholar

55.

V. A. Trjapitzin 1978, Hymenoptera II. Chalcidoidea 7. Encyrtidae, pp. 236–328. In G. S. Medvedev [ed.], Keys to the Insects of the European Part of the USSR, vol. 3. Academy of Science of the USSR, Institute of Zoology, Leningrad. Google Scholar

56.

V. A. Trjapitzin 2008. A review of encyrtid wasps (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Encyrtidae) of Macaronesia. Entomol. Rev. 88: 218–232. Google Scholar

57.

W. M. Wheeler 1907. The polymorphism of ants, with an account of some singular abnormalities due to parasitism. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 23: 1–99. Google Scholar

58.

W. M. Wheeler 1910. Ants, their Structure, Development and Behavior. Edn. Mac Millan, The Columbia University Press, New York. Google Scholar

59.

E. O. Wilson 1971. The Insect Societies. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Google Scholar

60.

L. Zappalá , M. A. Hoy , and R. D. Cave 2007. Interactions between the red imported fire ant, the citrus leafminer, and its parasitoid Ageniaspis citricola (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae): Laboratory and field evaluations. Biocontr. Sci. & Technol 17: 353–363. Google Scholar
Gabriela Pérez-Lachaud, John Noyes, and Jean-Paul Lachaud "First Record of an Encyrtid Wasp (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) as a True Primary Parasitoid of Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)," Florida Entomologist 95(4), 1066-1076, (1 December 2012). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.095.0436
Published: 1 December 2012
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top