Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2013 Hymenopteran Parasitoids Attacking the Invasive Emerald Ash Borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in Western and Central Pennsylvania
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We conducted field surveys of the emerald ash borer (EAB), Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire, and associated larval parasitoids in western and central Pennsylvania (Cranberry Township in Butler County and Granville in Mifflin County) in the spring and fall of 2009. The survey procedure involved destructively debarking sections of the main trunk (bole) of EAB-infested green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh.) trees from the ground to the height of 2 m. Three species of the hymenopteran parasitoids were consistently recovered from EAB larvae observed in both survey sites, including two indigenous species of braconids, Spathius laflammei Provancher (= Spathius benefactor Matthews) and Atanycolus nigropyga Shenefelt and the exotic (accidentally introduced) eupelmid Balcha indica (Mani & Kaul). In addition, there are three unidentified species of hymenopteran parasitoids including two braconids Atanycolus sp. [possibly Atanycolus disputabilis (Cresson)] and Spathius sp. (at the Butler Co. site) and one ichneumonid Dolichomitus sp. (at the Mifflin Co. site). These parasitoids together parasitized 0.5–4.6% and 0.5–1.5% of the sampled EAB hosts at the Butler and Mifflin Co. sites, respectively. Parasitism rate by each species or group of those hymenopteran parasitoids varied between the two survey sites—with parasitism rates being generally higher at the Butler Co. site than at the Mifflin Co. site. Studies are needed to determine if those new associations of North American indigenous braconid parasitoids with EAB may play a complementary role in controlling this invasive pest.

The emerald ash borer (EAB), Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleptera: Buprestidae), was first detected on North American ash (Fraxinus spp.) trees in South Detroit, Michigan in 2002 (Haack et al. 2002) (Fig. 1). A recent study of the dendrochronological evidence showed that A. planipennis was likely present (but had gone undetected) in Detroit, Michigan and Windsor, Ontario, Canada since the early to mid-1990s (Siegert et al. 2007). As of 2012, it has spread to 18 states in the northeastern and central U.S. and 2 provinces in Canada, and caused large-scale ash decline and mortality in many invaded-areas (EAB Information 2012). Besides the economic cost from treatment, removal, and replacement of infested landscape ash trees (Kovacs et al. 2010), this invasive pest has also had severe adverse effects on biodiversity and ecological services that depend exclusively on ash trees (Gandhi & Herms 2010).

Previous field studies conducted in the native range of EAB showed that several species of hymenopteran parasitoids were attacking immature stages (eggs and larvae) of EAB in Northeast China (Liu et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2007) and the Russian Far East (Duan 2012a). After safety-testing and regulatory approvals, 3 of these exotic parasitoid species, Spathius agrili Yang (Braconidae), Tetrastichus planipennisi Yang (Eulophidae), and Oobius agrili Zhang & Huang (Encyrtidae), were introduced from China to the U.S. for classical biocontrol of EAB (USDA APHIS 2007; Bauer et al. 2008; Duan et al. 2010, 2012b). Although these introduced parasitoids have established stable populations at several U.S. locations, parasitism rates of EAB by these introduced parasitoids are considerably lower in the introduced regions (1.5–5 % in Duan et al. 2010, 2012b) than rates (12–73%) reported from China (Liu et al. 2007, Wang et al. 2007) and Russia (Duan et al. 2012a). It remains to be seen if the classical biocontrol approach will result in successful control of EAB in the U.S.

In the meantime, field surveys conducted in North America have found several species of presumably native hymenopteran parasitoids associated with EAB larvae in Ontario (Lyons 2008), Michigan (Bauer et al. 2004, 2005; Cappaert & McCullough 2009; Duan et al. 2012b), Ohio (Kula et al. 2010), and Pennsylvania (Duan et al. 2009). These indigenous parasitoids consist of Phasgonophora sulcata Westwood (Chalcididae), as well as Atanycolus cappaerti Marsh and Strazanac, Atanycolus disputabilis Cresson, Atanycolus hicoriae Shenefelt, Atanycolus simplex Cresson, Atanycolus tranquebaricae Shenefelt, Leluthia astigma (Ashmead), and Spathius floridanus Ashmead (=Spathius simillimus Ashmead) (all Braconidae). Although parasitism rates of EAB larvae by most of the aforementioned parasitoids have been reportedly low (1–5%), A. cappaerti has been reported attacking >60% of EAB larvae in older infested ash stands in Michigan (Cappaert & McCullough 2009). In the present study, we report results from continued surveys of parasitoids in North America associated with EAB in western and central Pennsylvania, where the pest was discovered between 2007 and 2009. We also conducted laboratory tests with 2 recovered presumably native parasitoid species against EAB larvae to further confirm their associations and explore methods for their laboratory rearing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Survey Sites

We conducted surveys in naturally occurring ash stands in forested areas in both western and central Pennsylvania in 2009 (Fig. 1). The western Pennsylvania site consisted of 2 small isolated forested areas (each ≈ 3 ha, approximately 2 km from each other) located in Cranberry Township (GPS Coordinates Decimal Degree: N 40.70667° W -80.09605°) in Butler County in the unglaciated Allegheny plateau, where an EAB population was first discovered in 2007. The central Pennsylvania site consisted of 2 nearby, larger forested areas (each ≈10 ha, approximately 5 km from each other) located at Granville (GPS Coordinate Decimal Degree: N 40.5441° W -77.6152°), Mifflin County, in the ridge and valley region, where an EAB population was first discovered in 2009. The Butler and Mifflin Co. sites, approximately 350 km apart, were primarily early successional, second-growth northern deciduous forest dominated by oak (Quercus spp.) and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marshall). Less abundant trees species at these sites were shagbark hickory (Carya ouata (Mill.) K. Koch), boxelder (Acer negundo L.), black cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.), tulip poplar (Liriodendtron tulipifera L.), black walnut (Juglans nigra L.), Cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr. ex Marsh.) and other poplars (Populus spp.), American basswood (Tilia americana L.), spruce (Picea spp.), and pine (Pinus spp.).

Sampling Procedure

Surveys of parasitoids associated with EAB larvae were conducted in both the early spring (Feb–Jun) and fall (Sep and Oct) of 2009. At each survey time, we destructively sampled 2 to 4 green (Fraxinus penssylvanica Marsh.) ash trees with apparent symptoms of EAB infestation (e.g., bark splits, presence of woodpecker scaling and feeding damage, and epicormic growth on main trunk). All trees sampled were relatively large, with a mean (±SE) DBH (diameter at breast height) of 22.6 (±2.8) cm for the Butler Co. site and 27.2 (±1.9) cm for the Mifflin Co. site. For sampling, the section of the main trunk (bole) of each ash tree from the ground to the height of 2 m was debarked with a draw knife and examined for presence of immature stages of EAB and associated parasitoids. No trees were felled in the field, instead a 1-m step ladder was used to assist in sampling the upper (1.5–2.0 m above the ground) section of the main trunk. To avoid damaging immature EAB under the bark, we first cut the bark using the draw knife to reach the cambium and the surface of the wood tissue and then peeled down the bark exposing the immature EAB and parasitoids in EAB galleries between the interface of cambium and sapwood. Mature larvae (J-shaped 4th instars), prepupae and/or pupae in the sapwood were sampled by removing the shallow (0.1– 0.2 cm depth) sapwood tissues of their chamber with a chisel and hammer. In addition, mature larvae, prepupae and/or pupae nested in the utter bark were also sampled by breaking the bark into small pieces using a utility knife or hand. The exposed immature EAB stages (larvae, J-larvae, prepupae, and/or pupae) and associated parasitoids were collected with featherweight forceps (Bioquip Products #4750) and placed into individual cells of plastic culture plates (12 or 24 cells/ plate) or Falcon Petri-Dishes (4-cm in diameter). All storage containers contained moist filter paper or Kim wipes to maintain high humidity. EAB larvae and associated parasitoids were returned to the USDAARS Beneficial Insects Introduction Research Unit quarantine facility (BIIR, Newark, Delaware) to rear out parasitoid adults. Most of the parasitoids collected by debark sampling were immature stages (larvae and/or pupae), but a few were emerging adults. Adult parasitoids either directly collected from the field or recovered later from rearing in the laboratory were sent to the USDA ARS Systematic Entomology Laboratory (SEL, Beltsville, Maryland) or Paul Marsh (North Newton, Kansas) for identification. Voucher specimens were returned and deposited at the USDA ARS BIIR (Newark, Delaware). The fifth author (PMM) identified specimens of Atanycolus Förster, the fourth author (RRK) identified specimens of Spathius Nees, and Michael Gates (SEL) identified specimens of Balcha indica (Mani & Kaul) (Eupelmidae). The first author (JJD) identified the specimen of Dolichomitus sp (male) in comparison with the voucher specimen identified by RRK (Duan et al. 2009). EAB larvae were identified by JJD and RWF by comparing the specimens with ones reared from known EAB adults in the laboratory according to the characteristics described in Petrice et al. (2009) and Chamorro et al (2012).

Fig 1.

Locations where the emerald ash borer was first discovered and field survey samples were taken in western (Cranberry Township, Butler Co.) and central (Granville, Mifflin Co.), Pennsylvania.

f01_166.jpg

Laboratory Assay with Native Parasitoids

To evaluate parasitoid-host associations and explore for potential with laboratory rearing, we presented adults of Spathius laflammei Provancher (= Spathius benefactor Matthews) and Atanycolus nigropyga Shenefelt recovered from both survey sites to late instars of EAB larvae (3rd to 4th instars, including J-shaped mature 4th instar larvae) using the same method described in Duan & Oppel (2012). This method involved artificially inserting field-collected EAB larvae into ash sticks before exposing them to parasitoids. Sticks about 10 cm long and 2 to 5 cm in diam were freshly cut from field-grown green ash (F. pennsylvanica) trees. The sticks were sterilized by washing with warm soapy water and then placing them in a 10% bleach bath for 1/2 h after which they were flushed with copious amounts of cold tap water. The number of EAB larvae per stick varied according to the number of the parasitoids available for tests but were maintained approximately at a 2:1 host:parasitoid ratio in each assay. For the exposure assay, the EAB-infested ash sticks were exposed to adult parasitoids inside a test arena (17.6 × 12.6 × 10 cm ventilated polystyrene crisper boxes) for 2 wk. At the end of each assay, the exposed EAB-infested ash sticks were incubated in a growth chamber for a period of ≈30 days at 25 ± 2 °C, 55–65% RH, and 16:8 h L:D photoperiod for recovery of F1 parasitoid progeny. After parasitoid emergence ceased, all sticks were dissected and parasitism of EAB larvae by the test parasitoids was scored based on the presence of parasitoid cocoons or small circular parasitoid exit holes (each ≈1–1.5 mm in diameter) on the stick associated with the gallery of each parasitized larva. Dead EAB larvae were also dissected under a stereomicroscope for any evidence (parasitoid cadavers) of unsuccessful parasitism. Percentage parasitism for each trial was calculated as proportion of immature EAB successfully attacked, as evidenced by the presence of parasitoid exit holes or progeny produced by the test parasitoid.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

At both the Butler and Mifflin Co. sites, 3 species of the hymenopteran parasitoids were consistently recovered from EAB larvae observed in the survey. Two of those species, A. nigropyga and S. laflammei, are presumably native to North America as they were originally collected and described as species in North America (Krombein et al. 1979; Marsh & Strazanac 2009). The other species is an accidentally introduced (exotic) eupelmid, B. indica (Gibson 2005). Two morphospecies of Braconidae, Atanycolus sp. poss. disputabilis (Cresson) and Spathius sp. (Butler Co. site), and one of Ichneumonidae, Dolichomitus sp. (Mifflin Co. site), were also reared but not identified to species. Rates of parasitism of EAB larvae by these parasitoids ranged from 0.5 to 4.6% at the Butler Co. site and from 0.5 to 1.5% at the Mifflin Co. site [Table 1]. Parasitism rates by those parasitoids appeared to have varied between the 2 survey sites, with parasitism rates generally higher at the Butler Co. site than at the Mifflin Co. site.

While B. indica inflicted the highest rate (4.6%) of parasitism of EAB larvae, prepupae, and pupae at the Cranberry site, S. laflammei caused the second highest rate (2.6%) of parasitism of EAB larvae (3rd to 4th instars) at the same site. Spathius laflammei caused the highest level of parasitism at the Granville site, with a rate of 1.05%. The parasitoids not identified to species together caused approximately 0.5% of EAB larval parasitism in both survey sites.

As reported previously (Duan et al. 2009), B. indica was observed in association with remains of EAB larvae (2nd to 4th instars), prepupae, and/ or pupae. However, A. nigropyga, A. sp. poss. disputabilis, S. laflammei, and Spathius sp. were observed only in association with remains of 3rd to 4th instar larvae, not with prepupae and/or pupae. While B. indica and Atanycolus spp. were solitary in association with immature EAB stages, Spathius spp. were gregarious with a brood size ranging from 3 to 9 parasitoid larvae or cocoons in association with remains of each parasitized EAB larva. A recent laboratory study (Duan et al. 2011) showed that B. indica took a mean of 83 days (ranging from 47 to 129 days) to complete its life cycle at the constant 25 °C temperature. Based on this data, Duan et al (2011) suggested that B. indica might not have more than 2 generations in the mid-Atlantic and Midwest regions of United States, where normal growing seasons with average temperature above 25 °C - normally occur less than 6 months (May–Oct). Currently, we have little knowledge about the life history of the 2 native braconids, S. laflammei and A. nigropyga, and do not know how many generations they can potentially have on emerald ash borer populations in these regions.

Our laboratory assays showed that field-recovered S. laflammei successfully attacked >50% of 3rd to 4th instars of EAB larvae (N = 44) inserted into green ash sticks. A total of 121 F1 parasitoid progeny (adults) were produced from 23 parasitized EAB larvae, with an average brood size (± SE) of 4.8 (±1.5) and female:male ratio of approximately 3:1 across different assays (N = 5). In contrast, laboratory assays (N = 5) with field-recovered A. nigropyga adults failed to produce parasitism of late instar EAB larvae (N = 15) inserted in green ash sticks. This indicates that the laboratory conditions used are unsuitable for rearing A. nigropyga on EAB larvae inserted into ash sticks. Although it is probable that A. nigropyga collected from our sampled ash trees might be associated with other native ash-boring buprestid beetle larvae, we did not observe any other wood-boring larvae other than EAB in our sampled trees.

TABLE 1.

EMERALD ASH BORER LARVAE AND PARASITOIDS RECOVERED/COLLECTED FROM EAB-INFESTED ASH TREES (SPRING AND FALL, 2009).

t01_166.gif

EAB was first discovered in 2007 and 2009, respectively, in Cranberry Township (Butler Co.) and at Granville (Mifflin Co.) (Pennsylvania State University 2009). However, the extent of damage to ash trees in these 2 areas and the size of the infestation suggest that EAB might have been there several years earlier (JJD and RWF, unpublished data). Previous surveys conducted in 2008 in Cranberry Township (Butler Co.) only recovered 2 locally extant parasitoids, B. indica and Eupelmus pini Taylor (Eupelmidae), that caused about 3% parasitism of EAB larvae (Duan et al. 2009). The present survey demonstrated that 2 groups of presumably native braconid parasitoids, Atanycolus spp. and Spathius spp., are able to use EAB as a host and caused low level (< 3%) EAB parasitism in the 2 survey areas. As EAB becomes more firmly established with increased population densities in infested areas in the U.S., the role of parasitoids native to North America in suppressing EAB populations should be explored further.

Recent field studies conducted in Michigan, the epicenter of EAB infestation in the U.S., showed that presumably native parasitoids (i.e., Atanycolus spp., P. sulcata) inflicted relatively high rates (10–60%) of EAB parasitism (Cappaert et al. 2009; Duan et al. 2012b) in some older EAB-infested sites. In addition, Duan et al. (2012b) sampled the same sites repeatedly in Michigan over 2 yr and captured the succession and prevalence of parasitoid species attacking immature EAB at those sites. Such dynamic changes in the prevalence and species composition of EAB parasitoids will most likely continue in newly infested areas or regions and will vary with many ecological factors, such as tree species and Agrilus spp. from which these parasitoids originated, host range(s) of these parasitoids, local EAB density, and degree of disturbance due to ash mortality and decline. Along with the current EAB biocontrol program that involves release and establishment of introduced (exotic) parasitoids in the U.S., we recommend continuous study of indigenous parasitoids, such as Atanycolus spp. and Spathius spp., in North America for their complementary role in controlling EAB populations and/or their potential interactions with introduced biocontrol agents such as S. agrili and T. planipennisi. Future laboratory and/or field studies on the biology and life history of these native parasitoids would not only benefit in the method development for rearing them, but also in gaining insights into their potential for use in suppressing EAB populations.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Sven E. Spichiger (Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture), Mitchell Dykstra (APHIS PPQ Cranberry, PA), Donald Eggen (PA Bureau of Forestry, Middletown, PA), Shalah Werner (Sierra Club, Madison, WI), and Duane McKee (Cranberry Township, PA) for providing information concerning the infestation of EAB in western PA and Greg Sahene (Mine Safety Association Inc., PA) for allowing us to sample green ash trees on the company's property. We are grateful to Michael Gates (USDAARS Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Beltsville, MD) for identification of B. indica. We also thank Douglas Luster (USDA ARS) for critically reviewing a pre-submission version of the manuscript.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

L. S. Bauer , H-P. Liu , R. A. Haack , D. L. Miller , and T. R. Petrice 2004. Natural enemies of emerald ash borer in southeastern Michigan, pp. 33–34 In V. Mastro , and R. Reardon [Compilers], Proc. Emerald Ash Borer Res. Techn. Mtg, Port Huron, MI. FHTET-2004-02, USDA Forest Service Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, W. VA Google Scholar

2.

L. S. Bauer , H-P. Liu , R. A. Haack , R. Gao , T. Zhao , D. L. Miller , and T. R. Petrice 2005. Emerald ash borer natural enemy surveys in Michigan and China, pp. 71–72 In V. Mastro , and R. Reardon [Compilers], Proc. Emerald Ash Borer Res. Technol. Dev. Mtg., Romulus, MI. FHTET-2004-15, USDA Forest Service Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, W. VA Google Scholar

3.

L. S. Bauer , H-P. Liu , D. Miller , and J. Gould 2008. Developing a classical biological control program for Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), an invasive ash pest in North America. Nwsl. Michigan Entomol. Soc. 53: 1–5. Google Scholar

4.

D. L. Cappaert , and D. G. McCullough 2009. Occurrence and seasonal abundance of Atanycolus cappaerti (Hymenoptera: Buprestidae), a native parasitoid of emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Great Lakes Entomol. 42: 16–29. Google Scholar

5.

J. Duan Jian , and C. B. Oppel 2012. Critical rearing parameters of Tetrastichus planipennisi (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) as affected by host-plant substrate and host-parasitoid group structure. J. Econ. Entomol. 105: 792–801. Google Scholar

6.

J. J. Duan , R. W. Fuester , J. Wildonger , P. H. Taylor , S. Barth and S. E. Spichiger 2009. Parasitoids attacking the emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in western Pennsylvania. Florida Entomol. 92: 588–592. Google Scholar

7.

J. J. Duan , M. D. Ulyshen , L. S. Bauer , J. Gould , and R. Van Driesche 2010. Measuring the impact of biotic factors on populations of immature emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Environ. Entomol. 39: 1513–1522. Google Scholar

8.

J. J. Duan , P. B. Taylor , and R. W. Fuester 2011. Biology and life history of Balcha indica, an ectoparasitoid attacking the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis, in North America. J. Insect Sci. 11:127 available online: insectscience.org/11.127 Google Scholar

9.

J. J. Duan , G. Yurchenko , and R. W. Fuester 2012a. Occurrence of emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) and biotic factors affecting its immature stages in the Russian Far East. Environ. Entomol. 41:245–254. Google Scholar

10.

J. J. Duan , L. S. Bauer , K. J. Abell , and R. Van Driesche 2012b. Population responses of hymenopteran parasitoids to the emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in recently invaded areas in north central United States. BioControl 57: 199–209. Google Scholar

11.

EAB INFORMATION. 2012. Emerald ash borer information, published online at  http://www.emeraldashborer.info/homeownerinfo.cfm Google Scholar

12.

M. L. Chamorro , M. G. Volkovttsh , T. M. Poland , R. A. Haack , and S. W. Lingafelter 2012. Preimaginal stages of the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilinae): an invasive species of ash trees (Fraxinus). PloS ONE 7(3): e33185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033185Google Scholar

13.

G. A. P. Gibson 2005. The world species of Balcha Walker (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Eupelmidae), Parasitoids of Wood-Boring Beetles (Zootaxa 1033), Magnolia Press. Google Scholar

14.

K. J. K. Gandhi , and D. A. Herms 2010. North American arthropods at risk due to widespread Fraxinus mortality caused by the alien emerald ash borer. Biol. Invasions 12: 1839–1846. Google Scholar

15.

R. A. Haack , E. Jendek , H-P. Liu , K. R. Marchant , T. R. Petrice , T. M. Poland , and H. Ye 2002. The emerald ash borer: a new exotic pest in North America. Nwsl. Michigan Entomol. Soc. 47: 1–5. Google Scholar

16.

K. V. Krombein , P. D. Hurd Jr. , D. R. Smith , and R. D. Burks 1979. Catalog of Hymenoptera in America North of Mexico. Vol. 1 Symphata and Apocrita (Parasitica): 1–1198. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC. Google Scholar

17.

K. F. Kovacs , R. G. Haight , D. G. McCullough , R. J. Mercader , N. W. Siegert , A. M. Liebhold 2010. Cost of potential emerald ash borer damage in U.S. communities, 2009–2019. Ecol. Econ. 69: 569–578. Google Scholar

18.

R. R. Kula , K. S. Knight , J. Rebbeck , D. L. Cappaert , L. S. Bauer , and K. J. K. Gandhi 2010. Leluthia astigma (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Doryctinae) as a parasitoid of Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilinae), with an assessment of host associations for Nearctic species of Leluthia Cameron. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Washington 112: 246–257. Google Scholar

19.

H-P. Liu , L. S. Bauer , D. L. Miller , T. Zhao , R. Gao , L. Song , Q. Luan , R. Jin , and C. Gao 2007. Seasonal abundance of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) and its natural enemies Oobius agrili (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) and Tetrastichus planipennisi (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in China. Biol. Control 42: 61–71. Google Scholar

20.

H-P. Liu , and L. S. Bauer 2007. Tetrastichus planipennisi (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), a gregarious larval endoparasitoid of emerald ash borer from China, pp. 61–62 In V. Mastro , D. Lance , R. Reardon , and G. Parra [Compilers], Proc. Emerald Ash Borer Res. and Asian Longhorned Beetle Technol. Dev. Mtg., Cincinnati, OH. USDA FS FHTET-2007-04. Google Scholar

21.

B. Lyons 2008. Emerald ash borer: it's here to stay, let's learn how to manage it. For. Health and Biodivers. Nwsl. 12(1): 1–5. Google Scholar

22.

P. M. Marsh , and J. S. Strazanac 2009. A taxonomic review of the genus Spathius Nees (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in North America and comments on the biological control of the emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). J. Hym. Res. 18: 80–112. Google Scholar

23.

PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY. 2012. Timeline of emerald ash borer detection in Pennsylvania.  http://ento.psu.edu/extension/trees-shrubs/emerald-ash-borer/timeline-of-eab-detection-in-pa Google Scholar

24.

T. R. Petrice , R. A. Haack , J. S. Strazanac , and J. P. Lelito 2009. Biology and larval morphology of Agrilus subcinctus (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), with comparisons to the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis. The Great Lakes Entomol. 42: 173–184. Google Scholar

25.

N. W. Siegert , D. G. McCullough , A. M. Liebhold , and F. W. Telewski 2007. Resurrected from the ashes: a historical reconstruction of emerald ash borer dynamics through dendrochronological analysis In V. Mastro , D. Lance , R. Reardon , and G. Parra [Compilers], Proc. Emerald Ash Borer and Asian Longhorned Beetle Res. and Technol. Dev. Mtg., Cincinnati, Ohio, 29 Oct-2 Nov 2006. FHTET-2007-04, USDA Forest Service Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, W. VA pp. 34–36. Google Scholar

26.

USDA, APHIS. 2007. The proposed release of three parasitoids for the biological control of the emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) in the continental United States: environmental assessment. Federal Register 72: 28947–28948. Google Scholar

27.

X. Wang , Z. Yang , C. Liu , and E. Liu 2007. Relationships between the emergence and oviposition of ectoparasitoid Spathius agrili Yang and its host emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire. Front. For. China 2: 454–458. Google Scholar
Jian J. Duan, Philip B. Taylor, Roger W. Fuester, Robert R. Kula, and Paul M. Marsh "Hymenopteran Parasitoids Attacking the Invasive Emerald Ash Borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in Western and Central Pennsylvania," Florida Entomologist 96(1), 166-172, (1 March 2013). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0122
Published: 1 March 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top