Open Access
1 March 2013 First Record of a Florida Population of the Neotropical Carpenter Ant Camponotus novogranadensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
Mark Deyrup, Robert A. Belmont
Author Affiliations +

Florida specimens of Camponotus novogranadensis Mayr were first collected by Shawn Hole in May, 2012, in a residential development adjacent to Koreshan State Park in Estero, Lee County. The ants had entered and temporarily infested a relatively new residence near the park. These specimens were recognized as a previously unrecorded species for Florida by Robert Belmont, and sent to the Archbold Biological Station for identification. A subsequent visit to the area by Mark and Nancy Deyrup produced a small series of specimens from the vicinity of Koreshan State Park and enough observations within the park to confirm an established population of C. novogranadensis. Preliminary identification was made by comparison with specimens from Trinidad in the Archbold Biological Station (ABS) collection, and by photographs in the on-line species account for C. novogranadensis provided by Longino (2002). This identification was confirmed by Stefan Cover, who compared Estero specimens with series of identified specimens in the Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ), Harvard University. Florida specimens have been deposited in the ABS and MCZ collections.

In the field C. novogranadensis (Fig. 1) is easily mistaken for C. planatus Roger (Fig. 2). Both species are dark-colored, non-glossy, and small (majors are about 5mm long). Camponotus novogranadensis is black, with brown or yellowish brown antennae, clypeus, and the sides of the face above the mandibles. Camponotus planatus is usually bicolored, dark red with a black gaster, but occasionally completely black. Under the microscope these two species are conspicuously different. The clypeus of C. novogranadensis has a strong, sharp, median ridge, absent in C. planatus (Figs. 1 and 2). The mesosoma of C. novogranadensis is covered with small, semi-appressed hairs and large, sparse, curved, proclinate hairs (Fig. 1), that of C. planatus moderately densely covered with short, sub-erect hairs (Fig. 2). Color photographs of both species are available on the AntWeb site,, by entering the species name in the “Search for” box, or in Longino 2002. It is unlikely that C. novogranadensis is closely related to any other Camponotus species living in Florida. It has been placed in the subgenus Myrmaphaenus (Kempf 1972), which includes no other species in eastern North America, although this and most other subgenera of Camponotus should probably be considered in abeyance until the genus has been more thoroughly analyzed.

Fig. 1.

Major worker of Camponotus novogranadensis; length of ant about 5 mm.


The presumed native range of C. novogranadensis includes Mexico (Garcia Moreno et al. 2003), Guatemala (Branstetter & Saenz 2012), Honduras, Costa Rica, Panama, Colombia, Guyana, Surinam, French Guiana, Brazil, Peru (Kempf 1972), Ecuador (Ryder Wilkie et al.), and Paraguay (Wild 2007). Discontinuities in this known distribution might result from insufficient collecting data, but it is also possible that a species that has been introduced to Florida has also been relocated to some of the Neotropical areas where it now occurs.

Fig. 2.

Major worker of Camponotus planatus; length of ant about 5 mm.


It is probable that C. novogranadensis was introduced into Florida in plant material, such as pseudobulbs of orchids, or hollow stems. This might have occurred recently, or long ago, before extensive regulation of plant importation. This is the first record of establishment of C. novogranadensis outside its home range. This species, which is relatively easily identified, does not appear in the most recent list of ants that have been the subjects of long-range transport and have established populations in new areas (McGlynn 1999). The only other record of importation of C. novogranadensis refers to workers found in 1912 in Brazilian orchids imported into Kew Gardens in England (Donisthorpe 1915).

The ecology of C. novogranadensis, like that of most species of Camponotus, has not been studied in detail. Nests are in dead wood or hollow stems, usually in disturbed areas (Vasconcelos 1999, Longino 2002; Sanabria-Blandon & Chacon de Ulloa 2009; Ribas et al. 2012). It also occurs in the canopy of primary forest (Longino 2002). This species is listed as an indicator ant species of disturbed habitats (Ribas et al. 2012). In a study of effects of disturbance on ants in central Amazonia, Vasconcelos (1999) found ground-foraging C. novogranadensis in no mature forest plots, in 25% of plots in both old regrowth and new regrowth, and in 100% of plots in abandoned pasture. The diet of C. novogranadensis includes honeydew from Membracidae and Aetalionidae (Letourneau & Choe 1987), and nectar from extrafloral nectaries of orchids, which this species aggressively defends (Damon & Perez-Soriano 2005), and animal protein (in baits) (Vasconcelos 1999).

There is no indication from the literature that C. novogranadensis is a significant house-hold or agricultural pest in its native range, and no reason to believe that it is likely to become either an economic pest or ecological problem in Florida. Many species of introduced ants established in Florida cause no documented commercial or ecological damage (Deyrup et al. 2000). On the other hand, the effects of any introduced insect in Florida may escape notice until the species has been established and observed for a period of years.

A tally of Florida ant species in the ABS collection shows that with the addition of C. novogranadensis 227 species of ants are known to occur in Florida, including several species awaiting descriptions.


An established population of a Neotropical carpenter ant, Camponotus novogranadensis Mayr, is reported from Estero, Lee County, Florida. This species is similar in general appearance to C. planatus Roger, differing in color, pilosity, and clypeal shape. Camponotus novogranadensis is known from disturbed sites in Mexico, Central and South America; it has not previously been reported established outside its presumed native range. It is not known to cause economic or ecological problems.


Se informa de la presencia de una población de la hormiga carpintero Neotropical, Camponotus novogranadensis Mayr establecida en Estero, en el condado Lee de la Florida. Esta especie tiene una apariencia general similar a C. planatus Roger, que se diferencia por el color, la pilosidad y la forma del clípeo. Se conoce Camponotus novogranadensis de sitios perturbados en America Central y del Sur, pero no ha sido reportado anteriormente de estar establecida fuera de su rango de distribución nativa. No se conoce que cause problemas económicos o ecológicos.


We thank Shawn Hole of Massey Services, Inc. for collecting specimens for this paper. We thank Stefan Cover for comparing Florida specimens with specimens in the Harvard Museum of Comparative Zoology. Nancy Deyrup assisted in the hunt for additional specimens. This study was supported by the Archbold Biological Station.



M. G. Branstetter , and L. Saenz 2012. Las hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) de Guatemala, pp. 221–268 In E. B. Cano and J. C Schuster [eds.], Biodiversidad de Guatemala. Vol. 2. Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala. Google Scholar


A. Damon , and M. A. Perez-Soriano 2005. Interactions between ants and orchids in the Soconusco region, Chiapas, Mexico. Entomotropica 20: 59–65 Google Scholar


M. Deyrup , L. Davis , and S. Cover 2000. Exotic ants in Florida. Trans. American Entomol. Soc. 126: 293–326. Google Scholar


H. Donisthorpe 1915. British ants, their life history and classification. Plymouth, England. 379 pp. Google Scholar


D. Garcia Moreno , R. W. Jones , W. P. Mackay , and P. Rojas Fernandez 2003. Diversity and habitat associations of the ants (Insecta: Formicidae) of El Eden Ecological Reserve. Proc. 21st Symp. Plant Biol. Univ. California Riverside: 293–304. Google Scholar


W. W. Kempf 1972. Catalago abreviado das formigas da Regiao Neotropical. Studia Entomol. (N.S.) 15: 3–344. Google Scholar


D. K. Letourneau , and J. C. Choe 1987. Homopteran attendance by wasps and ants: the stochastic nature of interactions. Psyche 94: 81–91. Google Scholar


J. T. Longino 2002. Camponotus novogranadensis Mayr. 2002. Ants of Costa Rica., also, Accessed 1 Aug 2012. Google Scholar


T. P. McGlynn 1999. The worldwide transfer of ants: geographical distribution and ecological invasions. J. Biogeography 26: 535–548. Google Scholar


C. R. Ribas , R. B. F. Campos , F. A. Schmidt , and R. R. C. Solar 2012. Ants as indicators in Brazil: a review with suggestions to improve the use of ants in environmental monitoring programs. Psyche 2012. 23 pp. Google Scholar


K. T. Ryder Wilkie , A. L. Mertl , and J. F. A. Traniello 2010. Species diversity and distribution patterns of the ants of Amazonian Ecuador. PLoS One 5: e13146. Google Scholar


M. C. Sanabria-Blandon , and P. Chacon De Ulloa 2009. Hormigas como plagas potenciales en tres criaderos de mariposas del suroccidente de Colombia. Acta Agron. 58: 47–52. Google Scholar


H. L. Vasconcelos 1999. Effects of forest disturbance on the structure of ground-foraging ant communities in central Amazonia. Biodiversity Cons. 8: 409–420. Google Scholar


A. L. Wild 2007. A catalogue of the ants of Paraguay (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa 1622: 1–55. Google Scholar
Mark Deyrup and Robert A. Belmont "First Record of a Florida Population of the Neotropical Carpenter Ant Camponotus novogranadensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)," Florida Entomologist 96(1), 283-285, (1 March 2013).
Published: 1 March 2013
Back to Top