Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2013 Effects of Host Age on the Parasitism of Pachycrepoideus vindemmiae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), an Ectoparasitic Pupal Parasitoid of Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Biological control using an ectoparasitic idiobiont (e.g., Pachycrepoideus vindemmiae Rondani) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) can be an effective approach to reduce the economic losses caused by the melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae). In this study, we determined the parasitism of P. vindemmiae on B. cucurbitae pupae of different ages. The results showed that B. cucurbitae pupae at all ages could be successfully parasitized by P. vindemmiae. The higher numbers of pupae parasitized (10.12 to 9.32 pupae/day for no-choice tests and 8.0 to 7.82 pupae/day for choice tests) were achieved when 3 or 4-day old pupae were used as hosts. The selection coefficient revealed that P. vindemmiae preferred 3 or 4-day old pupae as the host. Pachycrepoideus vindemmiae females developed more quickly on 3 or 4-day old hosts than on pupae of other ages. Longevity of parasitoid offspring obtained from 2 and 7-day old melon fly pupae varied from 9.45 to 10.37 days and from 8.97 to 9.45 days for females and males, respectively. The emergence rate and proportion of female offspring of P. vindemmiae were not affected by the age of the pupae. However, our results indicate that the performance and suitability of P. vindemmiae were affected by the age of the host pupa age. Our findings may be useful for the development of biological control programs for B. cucurbitae.

The melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae) is an economically important pest of fruits and cucurbitaceous vegetables in many parts of the world (Uchida et al. 1990; Vayssières et al. 2007; Amin et al. 2011), including watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai; Cucurbitales: Cucurbitaceae), cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.; Cucurbitaceae) and courgette or zucchini (Cucurbita pepo L.; Cucurbitaceae), etc. (Tikkanen et al. 2000). Bactrocera cucurbitae has seriously impeded international trade because of quarantine regulations (APHIS 1988). Melon fly integrated management could be achieved using local area management or wide-area management (Dhillon et al. 2005). The local area management technologies include bagging of fruits, field sanitation, protein baits and cue-lure traps, host plant resistance, biological control, and soft insecticides (McQuate et al. 2005). The control programs used for a wide area management approach include sterile insect releases (Hendrichs et al. 2002), protein bait sprays and/or traps, augmentative parasitoid releases, field sanitation, insect transgenesis, and quarantine control techniques in combination with local area management options (Dhillon et al. 2005; Jang et al. 2008; Vargas et al. 2008). Area-wide IPM programs for melon fruit fly established in Hawaii and Seychelles have been successful suppressing fruit flies to below the economic thresholds (Mumford 2004; Dhillon et al. 2005). The augmentative release of biological control agents is one of the important methods to control the melon fly. In Hawaii, the establishment of melon fly has resulted in the introduction of many hymenopteran parasitoids (Wharton 1989; Purcell 1998). The natural enemy complex of melon fly in Hawaii consists of 8 species (Nishida 1955). Psyttalia fletcheri (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), Fopius arisanu (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and Opius fletcheri Silv. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) were introduced into Hawaii and are now successfully distributed throughout the major island chain, resulting in substantial reductions of fruit fly populations (Bautista et al. 2000; Bautista et al. 2004; Vargas et al. 2004). Moreover, F. arisanus and Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Ashmead) were mass-reared and used in a augmentative release strategy. Because of the successful establishment of egg and larval parasitoids there is an historical lack of data regarding pupal fruit fly parasitoids.

Idiobiont ectoparasitoids usually have a wide host range. Pachycrepoideus vindemmiae (Rondani) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) is an ectoparasitic idiobiont that exercises control over a great number of Diptera in the families of Tephritidae, Tachinidae, Sarcophagidae, Muscidae, Calliphoridae and Anthomyiidae (Marchiori & Barbaresco 2007). It is a solitary pupal parasitoid and a biological weapon against economically important tephritid flies including B. cucurbitae (Wang et al. 2004), B. dorsalis and Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) and several Drosophila (Marchiori et al. 2002, 2003). It is one of the parasitoids most widely used for the biological control of Musca domestica (L.) and Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus) (Meyer et al. 1990; Petersen et al. 1992). It is also known to be a hyperparasitoid of dipteran and hymenopteran parasitoids, and a superparasitoid and multiparasitoid when ovipositing in a single host (Tormos et al. 2009). As a facultative hyperparasitoid P. vindemmiae can attack some parasitic tachinid flies and other tephritid fruit fly parasitoids, such as Coptera silvestrii Kieffer (Diapriidae), Diachasmimorpha fullawayi (Slivestri), D. tryoni, Psyttalia humilis Silvestri (all Braconidae), and Tetrastichus giffardianus Silvestri (Eulophidae). These reports are all anecdotal and scattered among the older literature, and detailed information is lacking (Noyes 2002; Wang & Russell 2004). However, Van Alphen & Thunnissen (1983) have reported that P. vindemmiae can attack 2 larval parasitoids: Asobara tabida Nees and Leptopilina heterotoma (Thomson). Pachycrepoideus vindemmiae was introduced into Hawaii and several other countries in South America to control C. capitata and Anastrepha spp. (Purcell 1998; Ovruski et al. 2000), and was mass-released for the control of C. capitata in Costa Rica (Ovruski et al. 2000). Almost sixty fly species from over sixty countries have been reported as hosts for P. vindemmiae (Wang & Russell 2004). Wang et al. (2004) found that P. vindemmiae parasitized B. cucurbitae in mainland China, suggesting it could be mass-reared and used for the control of B. cucurbitae.

Successful parasitism requires a series of interconnected steps and complex interactions between parasitoids and their hosts, including habitat finding, host location, host acceptance, host suitability and host regulation. Host age has been frequently found to be a major factor affecting host acceptance and host suitability (Vinson & Iwantsch 1980). Many pupal parasitoids prefer to attack certain sizes or ages of a given host, although in most cases their progeny can develop in all host pupal ages (Li et al. 2006). Parasitoids can regulate the timing of their own life history through the mechanism of host selection (McGregor 1996). Hence, before undertaking largescale field releases of P. vindemmiae, it is essential to determine the optimum pupal age that can be most effectively parasitized by P. vindemmiae under laboratory conditions. With this information, P. vindemmiae can be released at the most effective time for the management of melon fruit flies.

In the present study, we examined the effects of B. cucurbitae pupal age on the parasitization, host mortality, development time, sex ratio and the longevity of adult progeny of P. vindemmiae under laboratory conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Parasitoid and Host Cultures

Bactrocera cucurbitae were mass-reared on banana-based artificial diets (50 g corn flour, 150 g banana, 0.6 g sodium benzoate, 30 g yeast, 30 g sucrose, 30 g winding paper, 1.2 mL hydrochloric acid and 300 mL water) in the Key laboratory of Entomology of the Ministry of Agriculture, China. Adults were fed with 1:1 sucrose: yeast. In order to obtain pupae of different ages, newly pupated B. cucurbitae were collected daily from lab colonies and kept separately according to the cohort in the 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7-day groups. These pupae at different developmental stages were used for the parasitism assays. One-day old pupae were not used, as the preliminary experiments demonstrated a high mortality upon parasitization.

A laboratory colony of P. vindemmiae was established from adult wasps that were naturally infesting other tephritid fruit flies cultured in the laboratory. Pupae of B. dorsalis were used as hosts for parasitoid rearing throughout this study. Adults (100 to 150 pairs) were kept in a cage (25 × 25 × 30 cm) provided with water and honey. About one to two hundred 2-3 day old B. dorsalis pupae were placed on a petri dish (9 cm 0) and introduced in the cage, and wasps were allowed to parasitize pupae for 48 h. All experiments were conducted under the same laboratory conditions at 26 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5% RH and 14:10 (L:D).

Host Preference Study

No- Choice Tests

To determine the most suitable host age for parasitoid development, B. cucurbitae pupae of six age cohorts (2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7-day old) were tested. A single P. vindemmiae female was introduced in a 500 mL glass bottle (HuanQiu GG-17, Jiangdu Glass Company) containing 30 pupae of a given age were placed along the circumference bottom of the bottle. The opening of the bottle was covered with black gauze for ventilation. After 24 h of exposure, the host pupae were individually placed in 100 mL plastic cups with humid sand (2 cm H and 30–40% RH) until emergence of wasps at room temperature. The opening of the plastic cup was covered with a fine nylon mesh (120 thread per inch2) for ventilation. Experiments with each cohort were replicated 25 times; as a control, 300 pupae of each age cohort were kept in plastic cups to estimate mortality in the absence of the parasitoid.

Choice Test

To examine the preference of female wasps for host pupae of different ages, 2-day-old mated females were offered host pupae of different ages in oviposition cages as described before. Each cage contained 6 parasitoids and 180 pupae (30 pupae in each of the six different age cohorts). After a 24 h exposure period, pupae were individualized in 100 mL plastic cups as described before. A total of 28 replicates were performed; as a control, 300 pupae of each age were kept in plastic cups to estimate the mortality in the absence of parasitoid.

Host Suitability Study

To determine the effects of host age on the development of P. vindemmiae, host pupae were exposed to 2-day old mated female parasitoids. Each oviposition cage contained 100 host pupae of a particular age and 15 female parasitoids, with 5 replicates per each pupal age. The exposed pupae were placed individually in 100 mL plastic cup until flies or wasps emerged. When adult parasitoids emerged, they were placed in a glass tube (10 cm L × 2.5 cm fi01_451.gif) with 5 other parasitoids emerged from the same age group, and provided with a 15% honey solution. The developmental time from egg to adult, sex ratio and adult longevity were registered.

Data Analysis

The following formulas were used to calculate the parasitism selection coefficient and the percentage of host mortality. The selection coefficient (Pi) of each stage in the choice tests was calculated by the following formula (Li et al. 2006):

e01_451.gif

Where, Pi is the relative parasitism index of stage i, Ri is the number of host pupae parasitized in age state i, and m is the total number of pupal stages tested in a trial (6 ages). The following formula improved from Abbott (1925) was used to correct for control mortality:

e02_451.gif

One-way ANOVA was used to analyze differences in the number of parasitized melon fly pupae, the parasitoid developmental time, mortality and survival rates in the different host pupal ages (SPSS 16.0 software package, 2008). Percentages were arcsine transformed before analysis but presented here as means ± SE. Tukey's test was conducted to detect differences in the above parameters among the different host pupal ages.

RESULTS

Host Preference Study

No- Choice Tests

The highest number of parasitized pupae that were was achieved in 4-day old pupae, and the lowest in 7-day old pupae (Table 1). The number of parasitized pupae did not differ between 3 and 4-day host pupae (Table 1). The host mortality rate decreased with an increase of the pupae age. The age of the host had no effect on the percentage of parasitoid emergence.

TABLE 1.

PARASITISM, PARASITOID EMERGENCE, AND CORRECTED MORTALITY RECORDED FROM BACTROCERA CUCURBITAE PUPAE PARASITIZED AT DIFFERENT AGES BY PACHYCREPOIDEUS VINDEMMIAE UNDER NO-CHOICE CONDITIONS.

t01_451.gif

Choice Test

When host pupae of different age groups were simultaneously available, P. vindemmiae parasitized all ages of B. cucurbitae pupae, but the highest numbers of parasitized pupae were recorded in 3 and 4-day old host pupae. The lowest number of parasitized pupae was registered when the host age was 7 days (Table 2). The selection coefficients of P. vindemmiae for 3 or 4-day old pupae were significantly higher than any other host age whereas 7-day old pupae had the lowest coefficients. The highest mortality (11.7%) occurred in 4-day old pupae, while the lowest mortality (3.6%) occurred in 7-day old pupae (Table 2). The emergence rate of adult wasps from host pupae of different ages did not differ.

Host Suitability Study

Mean development times from egg to adult emergence were affected significantly by the pupae age (df = 5, 917; F = 8.087, P < 0.05 for female and df = 5, 640; F = 3.556, P < 0.05 for male). The mean developmental times of P. vindemmiae were significantly longer in females that emerged from 6 and 7-day old pupae and males from 7-day old hosts, compared with other host ages. No significant differences were detected in developmental times of the individuals associated with 2, 3, 4 and 5-day old host pupae.

TABLE 2.

PARASITISM, CORRECTED MORTALITY (%), SELECTION COEFFICIENT AND PARASITOID EMERGENCE RATE (%) OF BACTROCERA CUCURBITAE PUPAE OF DIFFERENT AGES WHEN THE HOST PUPAE WERE EXPOSED SIMULTANEOUSLY TO 2-DAY-OLD PACHYCREPOIDEUS VINDEMMIAE FEMALES.

t02_451.gif

The sex ratios for broods were similar between wasps associated with different host ages (Table 3).However, the highest proportion of females occurred in the 3-day old pupae, followed by 5, 2, 6, 4 and 7-day old pupae, respectively (Table 3).

The age of the host significantly affected the longevity of P. vindemmiae adult females, vindemmiae females that emerged from 3-day old host (10.4 days) lived longer than those emerging from hosts of other ages while females from 7-day old hosts (9.5 days) had a shorter life. The adult longevity (9-10 days) of males was not affected by the host age.

DISCUSSION

Different hosts, different host instars or different host pupal ages may have different nutritional qualities (Harvey et al. 2000; Harvey & Strand 2002). The offspring of hymenopteran parasitoids rely on the host for all their nutritional needs. Most parasitoids have the ability to determine host quality during oviposition (Husni et al. 2001; Wang & Liu 2002; Chinwada et al. 2003; Li et al. 2006; Roriz et al. 2006). Younger host pupae generally offer nutrition of higher quality for subsequent development, so they are usually preferred for oviposition by parasitoids (Takagi 1986; Oloo 1992; Ueno 1997; Husni et al. 2001). However, some parasitoids prefer host pupae of medium age for their development (Pfannenstiel et al. 1996; Colinet et al. 2005).

TABLE 3.

EFFECT OF BACTROCERA CUCURBITAE PUPAL AGE ON THE DEVELOPMENTAL TIME, FEMALE PROGENY RATIO, BODY SIZE AND ADULT LONGEVITY OF PACHYCREPOIDEUS VINDEMMIAE (N = NUMBER OF REPLICATES).

t03_451.gif

We showed here that P. vindemmiae can successfully develop on pupae of all ages tested, but female parasitoids prefer pupae at medium ages (3 and 4 day old hosts) in both choice and no-choice tests. This suggested that there were some cues that allowed the female wasps to discriminate between the hosts of different ages. We speculate that 3 or 4-day old pupae may provide better nutritional quality than pupae of other ages. Other parasitoid species, i.e., Diadromus collaris (Wang & Liu 2002), Diadegma mollipla (Nofemela 2008) and Microplitis mediator (Li et al. 2006), also showed a preference for hosts of a particular age.

Both physiological and morphological changes in the host are related to development at a particular age, which varies and results in variation in its acceptability to the parasitoid and its suitability for the progeny of the parasitoid (Henry et al., 2005) Food quality is one of the most important factors, as pupae of different ages may not have the same nutritional quality. During the pupal development internal tissues undergo histolysis, histogenesis and differentiation to form adult internal organs and sclerotized appendages. Thus, older pupae may contain fewer resources for the developing parasitoids (Chapman 1971). Oviposition decisions (i.e., host selection and sex allocation) of female parasitoids are expected to correspond with host quality, as the fitness of their offspring is dependent on the amount and quality of resources provided by a single host (Stephens & Krebs, 1986).

Theories predict that the female wasp adjusts the sex ratio of her offspring according to environmental conditions or host quality. Hu et al. (2012) reported that the percentage of males among the offspring of P. vindemmiae decreased as the female's age increased, but increased again later. Females with poor food quality produced more male offspring. In our study, we found the lowest proportion of parasitoid females in 7-day old hosts.

Based on our results, it is preferable to use 3 or 4-day old B. cucurbitae to mass rear P. vindemmiae to optimize parasitism, parasitoid development and survival. In China, the area of the protected culture and greenhouse vegetable planting has developed rapidly in recent years. These particular planting suffered from infestations of melon flies. The melon fly always exists as a predominant species. There are no reports of successful use of natural enemies against the melon fruit fly in China, and parasitism of B. cucurbitae by native parasitoid species could be insignificant. In south china, B. cucurbitae is characterized by broadly overlapping generations (Ou et al. 2008). In the fields, various ages of B. cucurbitae pupae are usually available to be attacked by pupal parasitoids, such as P. vindemmiae during most of a year. The parasitoids can discriminate the different ages of host pupae, and choose the most suitable host ages for parasitization, and this offers an apparent advantage for the survival of the parasitoid population. To our knowledge, this is the first report showing that P. vindemmiae can develop on B. cucurbitae pupae of all ages.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

W. Abbott 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol. 18: 265–267. Google Scholar

2.

M. R. Amin , T. Sarkar , and I. J. Chun 2011. Comparison of host plants infestation level and life history of fruit fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillett) on cucurbitaceous crops. Hort. Environ. Biotech. 52: 541–545. Google Scholar

3.

Aphis (Animal And Plant Health Inspection Service). 1988. ‘Plant Protection and Quarantine Treatment Method’, in Schedules for fruits, nuts and vegetables section VI-T102, Hyattsville: USDA. Google Scholar

4.

R. C. Bautista , E. J. Harris , R. I. Vargas , and E. B. Jang 2004. Parasitization of melon fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) by Fopius arisanus and Psyttalia fletcheri (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and the effect of fruit substrates on host preference by parasitoids. Biol. Control 30(2): 156–164. Google Scholar

5.

R. C Bautista , N. Mochizuki , J. P. Spencet , E. J. Harris , and D. M. Ichimura 2000. Effects of depth of oviposition dish and age of rearing host on efficiency of mass production of the tephritid fruit fly parasitoid Psyttalia fletcheri. BioControl 45(4): 389–399. Google Scholar

6.

R. F. Chapman 1971. The Insects: Structure and Function, New York: Elsevier, 2 EDITION, pp. 3–20. Google Scholar

7.

P. Chinwada , W. A. Overholt , C. O. Omwega , and J. M. Muek 2003. Geographic differences in host acceptance and suitability of two Cotesia sesamiae populations in Zimbabwe. Biol. Control 28: 354–359. Google Scholar

8.

H. Colinet , C. Salin , G. Boivin , and T. H. Hance 2005. Host age and fitness-related traits in a koinobiont aphid. Ecol. Entomol. 30: 473–479. Google Scholar

9.

M. Dhillon , R. Singh , J. S. Naresh , and H. C. Sharmal 2005. The melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae: A review of its biology and management. J. Insect Sci. 5: 40 Google Scholar

10.

J. A. Harvey 1996. Venturia canescensparasitizing Galleria mellonella and Anagasta kuehniella: Is the parasitoid a conformer or regulator? J. Insect Physiol. 42: 1017–1025. Google Scholar

11.

J. A. Harvey 2000. Dynamic effects of parasitism by an endoparasitoid wasp on the development of two host species: Implications for host quality and parasitoid fitness. Ecol. Entomol. 25: 267–278. Google Scholar

12.

J. A. Harvey , and M. R. Strand 2002. The developmental strategies of endoparasitoid wasps vary with host feeding ecology. J. Ecol. 83: 2439–2451. Google Scholar

13.

A. Hasyim , M. Muryati , and W. J. De Kogel 2008. Population fluctuation of adult males of the fruit fly, Bactrocera tau Walker (Diptera: Tephritidae) in passion fruit orchards in relation to abiotic factors and sanitation. Indonesian J. Agric. Sci. 9: 29–33. Google Scholar

14.

L. M. Henry , D. R. Gillespie , and B. D. Roitberg 2005. Does mother really know best? Oviposition preference reduces reproductive performance in the generalist parasitoid Aphidius ervi. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 116: 167–174. Google Scholar

15.

K. Husni , Yooichi , and H. Hiroshi 2001. Effects of host pupal age on host preference and host suitability in Brachymeria lasus (Walker) (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 36(1): 97–102. Google Scholar

16.

J. Hendrichs , A. S. Robinson , J. P. Cayol , and W. Enkerlin 2002. Medfly area wide sterile insect technique programmes for prevention, suppression or eradication: The importance of mating behavior studies. Florida Entomol. 85(1): 1–13. Google Scholar

17.

H. Y. Hu , Z. Z. Chen , B. S. Duan , J. T. Zheng , and T. X. Zhang 2012. Effects of female diet and age on offspring sex ratio of the solitary parasitoid Pachycrepoideus vindemmiae (Rondani) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Rev. Brasileira Entomol. 56:259– 262. Google Scholar

18.

E. B. Jang , G. T. McQuate , D. O. McInnis , E. J. Harris , R. I. Vargas , R. C. Bautista , and F. M. Ronald 2008. Targeted Trapping, Bait-Spray, Sanitation, Sterile-Male, and Parasitoid Releases in an Area wide Integrated Melon Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Control Program in Hawaii. Am. Entomol. 54(4): 240–250. Google Scholar

19.

W. Y. Lee 1988. The control programme of oriental fruit fly in Taiwan. Chinese J. Entomol. (Special Publication 2) 51:51–60. Google Scholar

20.

J. C. Li , A. Thomas , W. L. Coudron Pan , X. X. Liu , Z. Y. Lu , and Q. W. Zhang 2006. Host age preference of Microplitis mediator (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), an endoparasitoid of Mythimna separate (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Biol. Control 39:257–261. Google Scholar

21.

J. D. Mumford 2004. Economic analysis of area-wide fruit fly management, In B. Barnes , M. Addison [eds.], Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Fruit Flies of Economic Importance, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 6–10 May 2002. Infruitec Press, Stellenbosch, South Africa. Google Scholar

22.

C. H. Marchiori , and L. F. Barbaresco 2007. Occurrence of Pachycrepoideus vindemmiae (Rondani, 1875) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) as a parasitoid of Megaselia scalaris (Loew, 1866) (Diptera: Phoridae) in Brazil. Brazililan J. Biol. 67: 577–578. Google Scholar

23.

C. H. Marchiori , L. A. Pereira , O. M. S. Filho , and L. C. S. Ribeiro 2002. Pachycrepoideus vindemmiae (Rondani) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) as parasitoid of Diptera, in Brazil. Arq. Brasileiros Med. Vet. Zoo. 54(6): 665–667. Google Scholar

24.

C. H. Marchiori , L. A. Pereira , and O. M. S. Filho 2003. First report on Pachycrepoideus vindemmiae Rondani (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) parasitizing pupae of Sarcodexia lambens Wiedemann (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) in Brazil. Cien. Rural 33(1):173–175. Google Scholar

25.

R. McGregor 1996. Phenotypic selection by parasitoids in the timing of life history in a leafmining moth. Evolution 50: 1579–1584. Google Scholar

26.

G. T. McQuate , S. L. Peck , P. G. Barr , and C. D. Sylva 2005. Comparative evaluation of spinosad and phloxine B as toxicants in protein baits for suppression of three fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) species. J. Econ. Entomol. 98(4):170–1178. Google Scholar

27.

J. A. Meyer , B. A. Mullens , T. L. Cyr , and C. Stokes 1990. Commercial and naturally occurring fly parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) as biological control agents of stable flies and house flies (Diptera: Muscidae) on California dairies. J. Econ. Entomol. 83(3):799–806. Google Scholar

28.

J. S. Noyes 2002. Interactive Catalogue of World Chalcidoidea 2001. Electronic Compact Disc by taxapad, Vancouver, Canada and the Natural History Museum, London. Google Scholar

29.

T. Nishida 1955. Natural enemies of the melon fly, Dacus curcurbitae Coq. in Hawaii. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 48(3): 171–178. Google Scholar

30.

R. S. Nofemela , and R. Kfir 2008. Diadegma mollipla parasitizing Plutella xylostella: host instars preference and suitability. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 126(1):9– 17. Google Scholar

31.

J. F. Ou , H. Huang , H. Wu , G. Q. Liu , J. H. Zheng , S. C. Han , and W. D. Mo 2008. Progress of Bactrocera (Zeugodacus) cucurbitae (Coquillett) in China. J. China Veg. 13: 33–37. Google Scholar

32.

G. W. Oloo 1992. Life table and intrinsic rate of natural increase of Pediobus furvus (Hym.: Eulophidae) on Chilo partellus (Lep.: Pyrilidae). Entomophaga. 37: 29–35. Google Scholar

33.

S. Ovruski , M. Aluja , J. Sivinski , and R. Wharton 2000. Hymenopteran parasitoids on fruit-infesting Tephritidae (Diptera) in Latin America and the southern United States: diversity, distribution, taxonomic status and their use in fruit fly biological control. Integ. Pest Mgt. Rev. 5(2): 81–107 Google Scholar

34.

J. J. Petersen , D. W. Watson , and B. M. Pawson 1992. Evaluation of Muscidifurax zaraptor and Pachycrepoideus vindemmiae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) for control flies associated with confined beef cattle. J. Econ. Entomol. 85(2): 451–455. Google Scholar

35.

R. S. Pfannenstiel , H. W. Browning , and J. W. Smith 1996. Suitability of Mexican rice borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) as a host for Pediobius furvus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Environ. Entomol. 25: 672–676. Google Scholar

36.

V. Roriz , L. Oliveira , and P. Garcia 2006. Host suitability and preference studies of Trichogramma cordubensis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Biol. Control 36: 331–336. Google Scholar

37.

D. W. Stephens , and J. R. Krebs 1986. Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, NJ, USA. Google Scholar

38.

M. Takagi 1986. The reproductive strategy of the gregarious parasitoid, Pteromalus puparum (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Oecologia 70(3): 321–325. Google Scholar

39.

O. P. Tikkanen , P. Niemela , and J. Keranen 2000. Growth and development of a generalist insect herbivore, Operophtera brumata on original and alternatives host plants. Oecologia 122(4): 529–536. Google Scholar

40.

J. Tormos , F. Beitia , E. A. Böckmann , J. D. Asís , and S. Fernández 2009. The preimaginal phases and development of Pachycrepoideus vindemmiae (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae) on mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera, Tephritidae). Microsc. Microanalysis. 15(5): 422–434. Google Scholar

41.

G. K. Uchida , R. I. Vargas , J. W. Beardsley , and N. J. Liquido 1990. Host suitability of wild cucurbits for melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett, in Hawaii, with notes on their distribution and taxonomic status. Proc. Hawaii Entomol. Soc. 30: 37–52. Google Scholar

42.

T. Ueno 1999. Host-size-dependent sex ratio in a parasitoid wasp. Res. Popul. Ecol. 41(1): 47–57. Google Scholar

43.

R. I Vargas , N. W. Miller, J. Long , K. Delate , C. G. Jackson , G. Uchida , R. C. Bautista , and E. J. Harris 2004. Releases of Psyttalia fletcheri (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and sterile flies against melon fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii. J. Econ. Entomol. 97: 1531–1539. Google Scholar

44.

R. I. Vargas , R. F. L. Mau , E. B. Jang , R. M. Faust , and L. Wong 2008. The Hawaii Fruit Fly AreaWide Pest Management Program. pp. 300–325, In O. Koul , G. W. Cuperus and N. C. Elliott [eds.], Areawide IPM: Theory to Implementation. CABI Books, London. Google Scholar

45.

J. F. Vayssières , J. Y. Rey , and L. Traoré 2007. Distribution and host plants of Bactrocera cucurbitae in West and Central Africa. Fruits 62: 391–396. Google Scholar

46.

S. B. Vinson , and G. F. Iwantsh 1980. Host suitability of insect parasitoids. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 25:397– 419. Google Scholar

47.

X. G. Wang , and S. S. Liu 2002. Effects of host age on the performance of Diadromus collaris, a pupal parasitoid of Plutella xylostella. BioControl 47: 293– 307. Google Scholar

48.

X. G. Wang , and H. M. Russell 2004. The ectoparasitic pupal parasitoid, Pachycrepoideus vindemmiae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), attacks other primary tephritid fruit fly parasitoids: host expansion and potential non-target impact. Biol. Control 31:227– 236. Google Scholar

49.

R. A. Wharton 1989. Classical biological control of fruit Tephritidae, In A. Robinson , G. Harper [eds.], World Crop Pests, Fruit Flies: Their Biology, Natural Enemies, and Control, vol. 3b. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 303–313 pp. Google Scholar
Hai-Yan Zhao, Ling Zeng, Yi-Juan Xu, Yong-Yue Lu, and Guang-Wen Liang "Effects of Host Age on the Parasitism of Pachycrepoideus vindemmiae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), an Ectoparasitic Pupal Parasitoid of Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae)," Florida Entomologist 96(2), 451-457, (1 June 2013). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0209
Published: 1 June 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top