Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2013 Aphelinidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) in the Mountain Localities of Miquihuana and Victoria, Tamaulipas, Mexico, with Description of a new Species of Encarsia
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Twenty species of parasitoid wasps of the family Aphelinidae were collected in mountain localities of the municipalities of Miquihuana and Victoria, Tamaulipas, Mexico. This is compared with the fauna of Aphelinidae present in the urban area of Ciudad Victoria. A new species, Encarsia santaelenae sp. nov. (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), collected in Rancho Santa Elena, Victoria, is described and illustrated.

All Aphelinidae are parasitoids, the most common hosts being hemipterans in the suborder Stenorrhyncha; many species of Aphelinidae have great economic importance in biological control of insect pests, including whiteflies (Aleyrodidae), armored scales (Diaspididae), soft scales (Coccidae) and aphids (Aphididae) (Woolley 1997). Several species in the genera Encarsia Foerster and Aphytis Howard have been introduced into Mexico to combat whiteflies and armored scales in citrus and other crops (Myartseva & Ruiz-Cancino 2000).

Aphelinidae contains 40 genera and more than 1,350 species in the world (Woolley 1997; Jung-Wook & Heraty 2012; Noyes 2012). In Mexico 194 species in 12 genera have been recorded (Myartseva et al. 2012a). Myartseva & Evans (2008) reviewed the species of Encarsia, the most diverse genus in the family in Mexico, and furnished a key for identification, including 88 species in 12 genera; 47 species were described by them as new for science. Reviews of the species in the more important aphelinid genera used for biocontrol in Mexico—Aphytis Howard, Eretmocerus Haldeman and Coccophagus Westwood—were published (Myartseva 2006a, 2006b, 2011a). Many of these publica- tions include new information on natural enemy complexes of insect pests, and descriptions of new species generally collected in urban areas. Given its host specificity and enormous diversity, the genus Encarsia has species that represent a huge, untapped resource for biological control of armored scale and whitefly pests. Effective utilization of this resource requires a clear knowledge of its taxonomy. Perhaps even more important, their role in controlling insects in natural ecosystems is virtually unknown (Polaszeket al. 2009).

The Sierra Madre Oriental is a mountain system, where tropical (200–800 m asl) and cloud (800–1,400 m asl) forests reach their northern limits in Mexico. Pine (Pinus) and oak (Quercus) forests form the more frequent types of vegetation (Gonzalez 2004). Isolation between mountains has been a fundamental factor in the regional biodiversity of plants and insects (Ruiz-Cancino 2010). In Tamaulipas, Pinus-Quercus forests are located between 800 and 2,500 m asl, this type of vegetation covers extensive areas between 1,400 and 2,300 m asl; in Miquihuana pine forest occurs between 1,400 and 3,100 m asl in separate areas. The dominant species in oak forests are Quercus glaucoides Martens & Galeotti, Q. lauriana Bonpl., Q. polymorpha Schlechthendal & Chamisso, Q. virginiana Mill, Q. oleoides Schlechthendal & Chamisso and Q. clivicola Trell. & C. H. Mull. Other trees found in these forests include madrone (Arbutus xalapensis Kunth; Ericales: Ericaceae), Croton fruticulosus Engelm. (Euphorbiales: Euphobiaceae), Persea podadenia S. F. Blake (Laurales:Lauraceae) and Randia sp. (Gentianales: Rubiaceae) (Treviño-Carreón & Valiente-Banuet 2005). At El Madroño, Victoria, oak forests (Q. rysophylla Weatherby, Q. laurina) occur with other trees such as madrone and pecan nut (Carya illinoensis Koch) (Juglandales: Juglandaceae), palms (Sabal mexicana Mart.; Arecales: Areaceae), agaves (Agave spp.; Asparagales: Asparagaceae), prickly pear cactus (Opuntia sp.; Caryophyllales: Cactaceae) and other cacti; shrubs as Karwinskia humboldtiana (Roem. & Schult.) (Rosales: Rhamnaceae) and ‘chamal’ (Dioon edule Lindley; Cycadales: Zamiaceae), herbaceous plants (Croton ciliatoglandulosus Ortega, Ageratina sp.; Asterales: Asteraceae) and grasses (Poales: Poaceae) are also present in the area (Ruiz 1984).

The objectives of this paper were to report the species of Aphelinidae collected in mountain localities in 2 municipalities (Miquihuana and Victoria) of the State of Tamaulipas, Mexico, located in the Sierra Madre Oriental mountain range, and to describe a new species of Encarsia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Specimens of Aphelinidae collected in several localities of the State of Tamaulipas and deposited at the Insects Museum of Universidad Autonoma de Tamaulipas, in Ciudad Victoria, were studied. Collecting took place in 4 localities of the municipalities of Miquihuana and Victoria, Tamaulipas. Miquihuana is located at N 23° 34′ W 99. 45′, and 1,500–3,670 m asl. Victoria is located at N 23fi01_548.gif 44.06′W 99° 07.51′, and 300–1,800 m asl.

In Victoria, specimens were collected in 3 mountain localities: ‘Balcón de Moctezuma’, ‘El Madroño’ and ‘Rancho Santa Elena’. Balcón de Moctezuma is located at Ejido Altas Cumbres, 18 km south of Ciudad Victoria, at 1,200 m asl; El Madroño is located 25 km southwest Ciudad Victoria, at 1,300–1,450 m asl; Rancho Santa Elena is located 15 km Southwest Ciudad Victoria, at 750 m asl.

Whiteflies, soft scales and armored scales were collected in different seasons on leaves and twigs of several plant species. Material was taken to the Laboratory of Biological Control, and held for parasitoid emergence. Parasitoids were preserved in vials with 75% ethanol. Also, material obtained in 2 Malaise traps located at El Madroño and Rancho Santa Elena was examined. Part of the material was mounted for species determination.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The fauna of Aphelinidae in the mountain localities includes 20 species in 5 genera (Table 1). Encarsia is the genus with more species (13). Two species of Aphytis found at this locality are parasitoids of armored scales, including A. miquihuana Myartseva, a new species described in 2010 (Myartseva et al. 2010). Two species of Eretmocerus are whitefly parasitoids and 1 species of Coccophagus is parasitoid of soft scales. Of the 13 species of Encarsia, 12 are parasitoids of Aleyrodidae and one attacks Diaspididae. Two species of Coccobius parasitoids armored scales were collected. The family Aphelinidae in these mountain localities therefore has 3 groups of hosts: Aleyrodidae (12 parasitoid species, 65% of all the Aphelinidae species), Coccidae (1 species, 5%) and Diaspididae (5 species, 25%). The host of the new species, E. santaelenae, is unknown; this species was obtained in a Malaise trap.

According to Miller (1996), 224 species in 68 genera of Diaspididae have been recorded from Mexico. Martin & Mound (2007) published a list of New World whiteflies, which included 3 subfamilies, 20 genera and 52 new species. According to Evans (2007), the aleyrodid fauna in Mexico consists of 123 species in 30 genera of 2 subfamilies.

In Mexico, we have found or reared 155 species of Aphelinidae whose hosts include primarily whiteflies and armored scales. Most of them were collected in natural and urban ecosystems. For example, in Ciudad Victoria 50 species in 6 genera were recorded (Myartseva et al. 2011b). In natural ecosystems in the State of Tamaulipas, especially in the Biosphere Reserve “El Cielo”, 42 species in 7 genera have been collected (Myartseva et al. 2011c).

In the mountain localities in Tamaulipas, which consisted of mainly oak forest, Aleyrodidae on trees and shrubs were found as the most common hosts of Aphelinidae (13 species). Seven species in 3 genera of Aphelinidae were described as new (Myartseva & Evans 2008; Myartseva et al. 2012b). One new species is described in this article.

Nine species of the aphelinids obtained in mountain localities were also found in urban areas. These are polyphagous species (Woolley 1997), which include the scale parasitoids Aphytis comperei DeBach and Rosen and Encarsia citrina (Crawford), and the whitefly parasitoids Eretmocerus comperei Rose, Encarsia citrella (Howard), E. formosa Gahan, E. luteola Howard and E. pergandiella Howard. The global host list for E. citrina includes more than 65 Diaspididae species, E. pergandiella and E. formosa have 19 and 17 host species, respectively (Myartseva & Evans 2008). Hosts of these Aphelinidae also include several insect pests of citrus and other crops in Mexico (Miller 1996): armored scales—California red scale Aonidiella aurantii (Maskell), citrus snow scale Unaspis citri (Comstock), lesser snow scale Pinnaspis strachani (Cooley), vanda orchid scale Parlatoria pseudaspidiotus Lindinger; whiteflies—sweetpotato whitefly Bemisia tabaci Gennadius, greenhouse whitefly Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood), citrus woolly whitefly Aleurothrixus floccosus (Maskell), and mulberry whitefly Tetraleurodes mori Quaintance. Some parasitoid species (Aphytis miquihuana, Eretmocerus montanus Myartseva and Encarsia altacima Myartseva & Evans) of these pests were found in mountain localities for the first time.

TABLE 1.

APHELINIDAE COLLECTED IN MOUNTAIN LOCALITIES IN MIQUIHUANA AND VICTORIA, TAMAULIPAS. (A — ALEYRODIDAE, C — COCCIDAE, D — DIASPIDIDAE, + PRESENT, - ABSENT). 1998–2012.

t01_548.gif

Aphelinidae species contribute to the natural control of Aleyrodidae and Diaspididae, protecting trees, shrubs and herbaceous plants in mountain localities in Tamaulipas. In Miquihuana and Victoria, species of polyphagous parasitoids (Aphytis comperei, Encarsia citrella, E. citrina, E. formosa, E. luteola, E. pergandiella) were collected. These parasitoids attack hemipteran pests in agricultural ecosystems and urban areas. Protection of Aphelinidae biodiversity may results in preservation of natural and agricultural areas. Protected areas are appropriate for the conservation of parasitoid wasp's diversity and provide an opportunity for beneficial insects and their hosts to establish an ecological balance.

ENCARSIA SANTAELENAE MYARTSEVA, SP. NOV. (Figs. 1–4)

  • Material Examined

  • Female

    HOLOTYPE: MEXICO, Tamaulipas, Victoria, Rancho Santa Elena, Malaise trap, oak forest, 17-XI tol-XII-2011 (S. Mireles and E. Ruíz Cancino, coll.), on slide. HOLOTYPE deposited in the Entomological Research Museum, University of California, Riverside (UCRC), USA.

  • Description

  • Length of body: 0.6 mm.

    Color. Head brownish, ocelli reddish, face and antennae yellow. Pronotum dark brown. Mid lobe of mesoscutum mostly brownish, laterally and basally yellow. Scutellum, axillae and side lobes yellow. Fore wings hyaline, venation slightly infuscate. Legs yellow. Propodeum brownish. Petiole infuscate. Gaster dark yellow, along sides narrowly dark, first and sixth gastral tergites brownish. Ovipositor yellow.

    Structure. Head not wider than mesosoma, about 1.4 times as wide as high. Frontovertex with stemmaticum transversely striate, about 0.6 times as wide as width of head. Eyes about 2.2 times as long as cheeks. Antennae (Fig. 1) inserted at the level of lower margin of eyes. Distance between toruli about 0.8 times as long as distance from torulus to eye margin. Antennal radicle 2.8 times as long as wide. Scape about 6 times as long as wide. Pedicel about 1.7 times as long as wide. First segment of funicle subequal in length to pedicel and about 2 times as long as wide. Second segment slightly longer and 2.7 times as long as wide. Third segment slightly wider and 2.3 times as long as wide. Club 3-segmented, slightly shorter and wider than funicle. Third to sixth segments of flagellum with 2 linear sensilla each. Mid lobe of mesoscutum with 8 long thin setae situated symmetrically. Sculpture of mid lobe reticulate. Scutellum about 0.7 times as long as mid lobe of mesoscutum and about 2 times as wide as long. Scutellar placoid sensilla very closely spaced. Anterior pair of scutellar setae slightly shorter than posterior pair of setae, and distance between their bases 0.8 times as long as that between bases of posterior pair of scutellar setae. Fore wing uniformly setose, 3 times as long as maximum width of wing. Marginal fringe about 0.4 times as long as wing width, base with 4 setae. Submarginal vein slightly shorter than marginal vein and with 2 short and stout setae along anterior margin. Marginal vein (Fig. 2) with 7 thin long setae along anterior margin. Hind wing about 11 times as long as maximum width of wing, its marginal fringe 2 times as long as width of wing. Tarsal formula 5-5-5. Basitarsus of mid tarsus longer than the 3 next tarsal segments combined (Fig. 3). Midtibial spur about 0.5 times as long as basitarsus of mid tarsus. Gastral tergites fifth to seventh with 4 setae each. Ovipositor (Fig. 4) slightly exserted, about 0.9 times as long as mid tibia. Third valvula 0.25 times as long as second valvifer.

  • Male Unknown.

  • Comments

    According to keys for Encarsia species identification by Heraty & Polaszek (2000) and Hayat (2012), Encarsia santaelenae sp. nov. appears similar to E. bimaculata Heraty & Polaszek, introduced from India to U.S.A. (see Table 2). Encarsia bimaculata is native to Southeast Asia and was intentionally introduced with other Encarsia species into Florida from India (Nguyen & Bennett 1955). According to Heraty & Polaszek (2000), it was found possibly as culture contamination from specimens of B. tabaci on Chamaesyce hyssopifolia (L.) Small (Euphorbiaceae); collected by P. A. Stansly in 1992 from Mexico.

    We found that Encarsia santaelenae sp. nov. is also similar to E. mexicella Myartseva (see Table 3), which was reared from an aleyrodid on leaves of Leucophyllum frutescens (Berland) (Lamiales: Scrophulariaceae) in Cd. Victoria, Tamaulipas, Mexico (Myartseva 2009). The new species was compared with the holotype of E. mexicella, which is preserved in the Insect Museum in UAT, Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas.

  • Note on Probable Biology

    As stated above, E. santaelenae sp. nov. appears to be closely related to E. bimaculata and E. mexicella. The closely-placed scutellar placoid sensilla, and the shape of the stigmal vein, strongly suggest it is a member of the Encarsia strenua (Silvestri) group, all species of which are parasitoids of Aleyrodidae.

  • Figs. 1–4.

    Encarsia santaelenae Myartseva, sp. nov., female: 1 — antenna, 2 — detail of marginal vein, 3 — midtibial spur and middle tarsus, 4 — ovipositor, ventral view.

    f01_548.jpg

    TABLE 2.

    DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ENCARSIA SANTAELENAE SP. NOV. AND E. BIMACULATA.

    t02_548.gif

    TABLE 3.

    DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ENCARSIA SANTAELENAE SP. NOV. AND ENCARSIA MEXICELLA.

    t03_548.gif

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    To PROMEP project “Taxonomy and ecology of fauna and mycobiota in forest communities and crops in Mexico”, and to UAT project “Ichneumonidae, Braconidae and Aphelinidae (Hymenoptera) in localities of Sierra Madre Oriental in Tamaulipas, Mexico”. We thank the reviewers and the associate editor of Florida Entomologist for their excellent suggestions.

    REFERENCES CITED

    1.

    G. A. Evans 2007. The whiteflies (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) of the world and their host plants and natural enemies. Computer version 070606, last revised: 11 Jun 2007. 727 pp. Google Scholar

    2.

    M. F. Gonzalez 2004. Tierra de ríos y montañas, pp. 41–64 In P. Robles , E. Ezcurra , E. Peters , E. Pallares and A. Ezcurra [eds.], La gran Provincia Natural Tamaulipeca. Gobierno del Estado de Tamaulipas y Agrupacion Sierra Madre. Mexico. 360 pp. Google Scholar

    3.

    M. Hayat 2012. Additions to the Indian Aphelinidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) — III: The genus Encarsia Förster. Oriental Insects 45(2–3): 202–274. Google Scholar

    4.

    J. M. Heraty , and A. Polaszek 2000. Morphometric analysis and descriptions of selected species in the Encarsia strenua group (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). J. Hymenoptera Res. 9(1): 142–169. Google Scholar

    5.

    K. Jung-Wook , and J. Heraty 2012. A phylogenetic analysis of the genera of Aphelininae (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), with a generic key and descriptions of new taxa. Syst. Entomol. 37: 497–549. Google Scholar

    6.

    J. H. Martin , and L. A. Mound 2007. An annotated check list of the world's whiteflies (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Zootaxa 1492. Magnolia Press. New Zealand. 84 pp. Google Scholar

    7.

    D. R. Miller 1996. Checklist of the scale insects (Coccoidea: Homoptera) of Mexico. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Washington 98(1): 68–86. Google Scholar

    8.

    S. N. Myartseva 2006a. Review of Mexican species of Coccophagus Westwood, with a key and description of new species (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Aphelinidae). Zoosystematica Rossica 15(1): 113–130. Google Scholar

    9.

    S. N. Myartseva 2006b. Eretmocerus Haldeman (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) — parasitoids of whiteflies Trialeurodes vaporariorum and Bemisia (tabacicomplex) in Mexico, with a key and description of a new species. Vedalia 13(1): 27–38. Google Scholar

    10.

    S. N. Myartseva 2009. Two new species of Encarsia (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), parasitoids of whiteflies (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) from Mexico. Biosystematica 3(1): 27–31. Google Scholar

    11.

    S. N. Myartseva , and G. A. Evans 2008. Genus Encarsia Förster of Mexico (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Aphelinidae). A revision, key and description of new species. Serie Avispas Parasíticas de Piagas y Otros Insectos No. 3. Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Ciudad Victoria, Mexico. 320 pp. Google Scholar

    12.

    S. N. Myartseva , and E. RuÍZ-Cancino 2000. Annotated checklist of the Aphelinidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of Mexico. Folia Entomol. Mexicana 109: 7–33. Google Scholar

    13.

    S. N. Myartseva , E. RuÍZ-Cancino , and J. M. Coronado-Blanco 2011a. Especies de Eretmocerus Haldeman (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) de México con maza antenal corta, clave y descripción de una nueva especie. Acta Zool. Mexicana (n. s.) 27(3): 583–590. Google Scholar

    14.

    S. N. Myartseva , E. RuÍZ-Cancino , and J. M. Coron Ado-Blanco 2011b. Los afelinidos (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Aphelinidae) en la zona urbana de Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, Mexico, pp. 176–180 En Memoria 22° Encuentro Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica del Golfo de México. Google Scholar

    15.

    S. N. Myartseva , E. RuÍZ-Cancino , and J. M. Coron Ado-Blanco 2011c. Aphelinidae (Hymenoptera) en ambientes naturales del Estado de Tamaulipas, México. Entomol. Mexicana 10: 745–748. Google Scholar

    16.

    S.N. Myartseva , E. RuÍZ-Cancino , and J. M. Coron Ado-Blanco 2012a. Aphelinidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) de importancia agrícola en México. Revisión y claves. Serie Avispas Parasíticas de Plagas y otros Insectos No. 8. Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas. México. 413 pp. Google Scholar

    17.

    S. N. Myartseva , E. RuÍZ-Cancino , and J. M. Coron Ado-Blanco 2012b. Especies de Eremocerus Haldeman (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) parasitoides de mosquitas blancas del género Tetraleurodes Cockerell (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) en México, con la descripción de tres especies nuevas. Dugesiana 18(2): 189–195. Google Scholar

    18.

    R. Nguyen , and F. D. Bennett 1955. Importation and field release of parasites against silverleaf whitefly, Bemisia argentifolii (Bellows & Perring) in Florida from 1990–1994. Proc. Florida State Hort. So. 108: 43–47. Google Scholar

    19.

    J. S. Noyes 2012. An inordinate fondness of beetles, but seemingly even more fond of micro hymenoptera! Hamuli, Newsl. Intl. Soc. Hymenopterists 3(2): 5–8. Google Scholar

    20.

    A. Polaszek , E. M. HernÁNdez-SuÁRez , S. Manzari , P. A. Pedata , and S. Schmidt 2009. Megadiversity of Encarsia (Chalcidoidea, Aphelinidae): macroevolution in a microhymenopteran. Memoria Taller Internacional de Recursos Naturales. Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, México, pp. 87–92. Google Scholar

    21.

    C. E. RuÍZ 1984. Géneros de Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) de algunas localidades del noreste de México. Tesis M.C. ITESM. Mexico. 140 pp. Google Scholar

    22.

    E. RuÍZ-Cancino 2010. Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) del Estado de Tamaulipas, México. Serie Avispas Parasíticas de Plagas y otros Insectos No. 6. Editorial Planea. Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, Mexico. 184 pp. Google Scholar

    23.

    J. TreviÑO-CarreÓN , and A. Valiente Banuet 2005. La vegetación de Tamaulipas y sus principales asociaciones vegetales, pp. 22–46 In L. Barrientos , A. Correa Sandoval , J. V. Horta Vega and J. García Jiménez [eds.], Biodiversidad Tamaulipeca, Vol. 1. Instituto Tecnológico de Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, México. 272 pp. Google Scholar

    24.

    J. B. Woolley 1997. Aphelinidae, pp. 134–150 In G. A. P. Gibson , J. T. Huber and J. B. Woolley [eds.], Annotated keys to the genera of Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Canada. 794 pp. Google Scholar
    Svetlana N. Myartseva, Enrique Ruiz-Cancino, and Juana Maria Coronado-Blanco "Aphelinidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) in the Mountain Localities of Miquihuana and Victoria, Tamaulipas, Mexico, with Description of a new Species of Encarsia," Florida Entomologist 96(2), 548-553, (1 June 2013). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0220
    Published: 1 June 2013
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    6 PAGES


    SHARE
    ARTICLE IMPACT
    Back to Top