BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2013 Biological Characteristics of Trichospilus diatraeae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) are Influenced by the Number of Females Exposed Per Pupa of Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)
Kellen Favero, Fabricio Fagundes Pereira, Samir Oliveira Kassab, Harley Nonato De Oliveira, Daniele Perassa Costa, José Cola Zanuncio
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Different numbers of parasitoid females confined with a host can variously affect the number, sex ratio and other characteristics of the parasitoid's progeny. The objective of this study was to elucidate the effects of various ratios of Trichospilus diatraeae Cherian & Margabandhu (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) females to pupae of one its hosts, Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), primarily on the number of this parasitoid's progeny and their sex ratio. Both the parasitoid and the host used in this study were taken from cultures reared in the laboratory by standard methods. In order to minimize the effects of variations in host weight, 24 h-old T. molitor pupae weighing between 0.110 and 0.140 g were held as a single individuals in glass tubes (2.5 cm Ø × 14 cm L) with 48 h-old T. diatraeae females for 72 h to allow parasitization. After this period, female wasps were removed and the host pupa were transferred, one per glass tube, to a climate-controlled room at 25 ± 2 °C, 70 ± 10% RH and 12:12 h L:D. The experimental design was completely randomized with six treatments (parasitoid-host ratios) and 12 replicates per treatment. The ratios of T. diatraeae females per host used were: 1:1, 7:1, 14:1, 21:1, 28:1 and 32:1. The percentage parasitism of T. diatraeae on T. molitor pupae was 33.33, 82.00 and 83.33% at ratios of 1:1, 7:1 and 14:1, respectively, and 100% at all other ratios. The emergence of T. diatraeae adults from parasitized pupae was 75% at a parasitoid-host ratio of 1:1 and 100% at ratios of 21:1, 28:1 and 32:1. The duration of the parasitoid's life cycle ranged from 21.00 ± 2.22 to 24.00 ± 2.00 days at parasitoid-host ratios of 32:1 and 1:1, respectively. The number of T. diatraeae progeny per T. molitor pupa was highest at a ratio of 21:1 (246.50 ± 50.18). The proportion of T. diatraeae females in the offspring decreased as the parasitoid-host ratio increased, varying between 0.82 ± 0.06 and 0.97 ± 0.01. A parasitoid-host ratio of 21:1 T. diatraeae females per T. molitor pupa is considered the most adequate and appropriate for mass-rearing of this parasitoid. Tenebrio molitor appears to be a suitable alternate host for efficient mass-rearing of T. diatraeae for biological control of lepidopteran pests. At the parasitoid-host ratio of 21:1, each T. molitor pupa supported the production of 246.5 parsitoids of which 88% were females, i.e., 216.9 females and 29.6 males; each T. diatraeae female produced 9.55 ± 0.48 female progeny, and the developmental time from egg to adult was 20.4 days.

Parasitoids are among the most common natural enemies of the class Insecta. The families Aphelinidae, Braconidae, Encyrtidae, Ichneumonidae, Pteromalidae, Trichogrammatidae and Eulophidae in the order Hymenoptera are the most commonly used parasitoids for biological control of insects (Van Driesche & Bellows 1996). Trichospilus diatraeae Cherian & Margabandhu (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) is a pupal parasitoid with potential for use in biological control of numerous lepidopteran pests. It has been reported to parasitize insects in the Arctiidae (Zaché et al. 2012), Crambidae (Paron & Berti-Filho 2000; Chichera et al. 2012; Rodrigues et al. 2013), Geometridae (Pereira et al. 2008; Zaché et al. 2010), Nymphalidae (Bouĉek 1976), Noctuidae (Andrade et al. 2010), Pyralidae (Bennett et al. 1987; Kazmi & Chauhan 2003; Melo et al. 2011) and Riodinidae (Zaché et al. 2011).

Mass-rearing is an important process of biological control programs. The nutritional quality, size, age, mechanical resistance and the immunological response of the host should be considered when selecting alternative hosts for mass-rearing of parasitoids (Pastori et al. 2008; Pereira et al. 2009; Pereira et al. 2010). Trichospilus diatraeae displays adequate biological characteristics when reared in pupa of the following alternate hosts: Anticarsia gemmatalis (Hübner), Heliothis virescens (Fabricius), Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Diatraea saccharalis (F.) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) (Paron & Berti-Filho 2000). Trichospilus diatraeae is a gregarious parasitoid, which makes it necessary to define the optimal ratio of females per host pupa to increase the production of descendants of quality similar to that of wild T. diatraeae. The ratio of female parasitoids per host affects the capacity of parasitism (Sagarra 2000a), production of progeny (Chong & Oetting 2006), the sex ratio of the offspring (Choi et al. 2001), the cycle duration, and the longevity of the adults (Silva-Torres & Matthews 2003). The assessment of these biological characteristics is important to increase the rearing efficiency in biological control programs.

Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) can easily be mass-reared at low cost, and used as an alternate host for the parasitoid Palmistichus elaeisis Delvare & LaSalle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) (Zanuncio et al. 2008). Preliminary tests have shown that T. diatraeae can parasitize T. molitor pupae (Favero 2009). The objective of this study was to optimize the rearing of T. diatraeae in the laboratory by using different ratios of T. diatraeae females per T. molitor host pupa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experiments were conducted at the “Laboratório de Entomologia/Controle Biológico (LECOBIOL)” of the “Faculdade de Ciências Agrârias (FCA)” of the “Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados (UFGD)” in Dourados, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.

Rearing of Tenebrio molitor

The pupae used in this study were reared in the LECOBIOL laboratory, where larvae of T. molitor were maintained in plastic trays (39.3 cm W × 59.5 cm L × 7.0 cm H), and fed wheat bran (97%), yeast (3%) and pieces of chayote (Sechium edule) according to the methodology of Zamperline & Zanuncio (1992).

Rearing of Trichospilus diatraeae

Trichospilus diatraeae adults were reared at the LECOBIOL laboratory in glass tubes (2.5 cm Ø 0 × 8.5 cm L) sealed with cotton swabs. The insects were fed with droplets of honey. Twenty-four to 48 h-old D. saccharalis pupa were exposed to T. diatraeae females for 72 h. Parasitized pupa were separated and maintained individually at 25 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 10% RH and 14:10 h L:D until adult emergence (Pereira et al. 2008; Chichera et al. 2012).

Experimental Design

In order to minimize the effects of host weight variation, 24 h-old T. molitor pupae weighing between 0.110 and 0.140 g were held as single individuals in glass tubes (2.5 cm Ø × 14 cm L) with 48 h-old T. diatraeae females for 72 h to allow parasitization. After this period, female wasps were removed and the host pupa transferred to glass tubes in a climate-controlled room at 25 ± 2 °C, 70 ± 10% RH and 12:12 h L:D. The experimental design was completely randomized with 6 treatments (parasitoid-host ratios). The ratios of T. diatraeae females per host used were: 1:1, 7:1, 14:1, 21:1, 28:1 and 32:1, with 12 replicates per treatment.

The mean duration of the life cycle (egg to adult), the adult emergence rate (%), percent parasitism, number of offspring, sex ratio (SR = number of females/ number of females + number of males), and numbers of immature T. diatraeae that did not complete development were registered. The sex of adult parasitoids was determined by assessing the morphological characteristics of their antennae and abdomen (LaSalle 1994).

The natural mortality of the host was calculated (Abbott 1925) in the same environmental conditions as the experiment. T. diatraeae emergence and parasitism were analyzed using a generalized linear model with a binomial distribution (P ≤ 0.05) with the R Statistical System (Ihaka & Gentleman 1996). This analysis was carried out using the original non-parametric data; however, the data are presented in percentage values to facilitate visualization.

The other parameters were subject to analysis of variance and if significant at 5% probability, regression analysis was conducted. Equations were selected using the linear, quadratic and cubic models, based on the coefficient of determination (R2), significance of the regression coefficients (ßi) and regression by the F-test (up to 5% probability).

RESULTS

Percent parasitism and adult emergence of T. diatraeae from T. molitor pupa were influenced by the number of parasitoids females per host. Percent of parasitism was 33.33% and 83.33% at ratios of 1:1 and 14:1, respectively, and 100% for all other ratios (χ2 = 38.651; P = 0.001) (Fig. 1 and Table 1). Adult emergence was 75% at a parasitoid-host ratio of 1:1, 83.33% at 14:1, and 100%. for the ratios 21:1, 28:1 and 32:1, respectively (χ2 = 42.548; P =0.001) (Fig. 1).

Developmental time from egg to adult for T. diatraeae in T. molitor pupa was 21.00 ± 2.22 days at a parasitoid-host ratio of 32:1, and 24.00 ± 2.00 days at ratio 1:1 (F = 3.72; P = 0.03; Treat = 0.53) (Fig. 2 and Table 1). The number of progeny per T. molitor pupa (F = 10.39; P = 0.0001; R2Treat= 0.67) increased with parasitoid-host ratio up to 21:1 (246.50 ± 50.18) (Fig. 3 and Table 1). The number of females produced per T. diatraeae female (F = 56.01; P = 0.0001; R2Treat = 0.73) was inversely proportional to the parasitoid-host ratio, and ranged between 4.53 ± 1.64 and 66.66 ± 9.22 females at ratios of 28:1 and 1:1, respectively (Fig. 4).

The number of dead immature T. diatraeae found inside T. molitor pupa was not influenced by parasitoid-host ratio (P ≤ 0.05), with average values of 4.56 ± 2.87, 3.78 ± 3.38, 3.33 ± 2.73, 4.00 ± 3.38, 3.67 ± 1.0, and 4.64 ± 4.08 for parasitoidhost ratios 1:1, 7:1, 14:1, 21:1, 28:1 and 32:1, respectively. The sex ratio of the offspring, estimated as the proportion of females produced in T. molitor pupae (F = 8.47; P = 0.0006; R2Treat= 0.95) was highest (0.97 ± 0.01) at a 1:1 parasitoid-host ratio.

Fig. 1.

Percentage of parasitism and emergence of adult Trichospilus diatraeae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) at 6 parasitoid-host ratios per Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) pupa (12:12 h L:D at 25 ± 2 °C and 70 ± 10% RH).

f01_583.jpg

TABLE 1.

BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF TRICHOSPILUS DIATRAEAE AT PARASITOID/HOST RATIOS OF 1:7, 1:14, 1:21, 1:28 AND 1:32 PARASITOID FEMALES PER TENEBRIO MOLITOR PUPA AT 25 ± 2 °C AND 70 ± 10% RH WITH A 12:12 H L:D PHOTOPERIOD.

t01_583.gif

DISCUSSION

The biological characteristics (parasitism, adult emergence and progeny) of T. diatraeae per T. molitor pupa indicated that, for mass-rearing of this natural enemy, the optimal number of females parasitoids per host should be 21. Paron & Berti Filho (2000) demonstrated that exposure to one or many T. diatraeae females per pupa of D. saccharalis, A. gemmatalis, H. virescens and S. frugiperda did not affect emergence and parasitism rates. However, the biological characteristics of the descendants may be affected by competition among the parasitoids after oviposition (Chong & Oetting 2007).

Fig. 2.

Duration of the period egg to adult for Trichospilus diatraeae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) at 6 parasitoid-host ratios per Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) pupa (12:12 h L:D at 25 ± 2 °C and 70 ± 10% RH) (F = 3.7206; P = 0.0304; R2 Treat = 0.5344).

f02_583.jpg

The progeny of T. diatraeae were affected by the number of females per pupa of T. molitor. Low ratios of female parasitoids per host resulted in less oviposition per host. The ratio of parasitoid females per host pupa can affect fecundity and reduce the efficiency of mass-rearing systems, mainly due to an increase of competition by the immature stages within the same host pupa (Sagarra et al. 2000a). A similar effect was reported for P. elaeisis reared in Bombyx mori Linnaeus (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae) pupae (Pereira et al. 2010).

Fig. 3.

Number of Trichospilus diatraeae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) progeny at 6 parasitoid-host ratios per Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) pupa (12:12 h L:D at 25 ± 2 °C and 70 ± 10% RH) (F = 10.3936; P = 0.0001; R 2Treat = 0.6695).

f03_583.jpg

Fig. 4.

Number of progeny per female Trichospilus diatraeae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) at 6 parasitoidhost ratios per Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) pupa (12:12 h L:D at 25 ± 2 °C and 70 ± 10% RH) (F = 56.0123; P = 0.0001; R2Treat = 0.7264).

f04_583.jpg

The number of T. diatraeae descendants per host decreased at the highest ratios of female parasitoids per host. This suggests that T. diatraeae females have a strong tendency to avoid superparasitism (Sagarra et al. 2000a,b; Zanuncio et al. 2008; Pereira et al. 2009; Soares et al. 2009). Another factor that may explain the decreased numbers of parasitoid offspring at the highest ratios is that the host has a given carrying capacity above which food becomes a limiting factor for parasitoid development (Pereira et al. 2010).

The low rates of parasitism and adult emergence at parasitoid-host ratio 1:1 suggest that T. molitor pupa may have defense mechanisms against T. diatraeae. The host can have cellular defenses and reactions involving encapsulation and melanization of endoparasitoid eggs (Pennacchio & Strand 2006). Superparasitism could increase the survival of parasitoid progeny by overwhelming the cellular immune response of the host (Andrade et al. 2010). Parasitism by P. elaeisis on B. mori pupa showed similar trends to those in this study. Emergence of P. elaeisis descendants per B. mori pupa was observed only at a ratio of 45:1. The authors suggested that a given parasitoid-host ratio would neutralize the defense mechanisms of B. mori (Pereira et al. 2010).

The developmental period for T. diatraeae, from egg to adult emergence decreased at the highest ratios. However, the number of T. diatraeae per host did not affect the number of dead immatures inside T. molitor pupae. Reduced developmental period may be caused by competition between immature T. diatraeae, with physical combat or physiological suppression, which may reduce egg to adult development time of this parasitoid (Brodeur & Boivin 2004). Silva-Torres & Matthews (2003) suggested that high numbers of Melittobia digitata Dahms (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) per pupa of Neobellieria bullata Parker (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) reduced the developmental time (egg-adult) of this parasitoid.

The number of females produced per female was inversely proportional to the number of descendants obtained, where low ratios produced the largest numbers of females. Generally, superparasitism decreases the number of female progeny (Soares et al. 2009). Andrade et al. (2012) reported that the offspring sex ratio is determined by the number of females that oviposit simultaneously; as this number increased, the number of fertilized eggs decreased. By contrast, in other cases the highest ratios produced the highest proportion of females (Silva-Torres & Matthews 2003; Chong & Oetting 2006).

The use of parasitoids for biological control programs depends on their development and reproduction in a preferred or suitable alternate host, which must present adequate nutritional conditions and low production cost. Trichospilus diatraeae can develop in T. molitor pupa and the information obtained in this study may facilitate efficient mass-rearing of this natural enemy for biological control of lepidopteran pests.

CONCLUSION

Tenebrio molitor pupa are adequate for rearing T. diatraeae. The ratio of 21 T. diatraeae females per T. molitor pupa produced the most parasitoid offspring and reduced variation in the biological characteristics of this natural enemy (Table 1). At this parasitoid-host ratio, each T. molitor pupa supported the production of 246.5 parsitoids of which 88% were females, i.e., 216.9 females and 29.6 males; each T. diatraeae female produced 9.55 ± 0.48 female progeny, and the developmental time from egg to adult was 20.4 days.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the Brazilian institutions “Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Fundação de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento do Ensino, and Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul (FUNDECT)” and “Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)”. We thank undergraduate student Gabriela Piñeyro for translating the abstract to Spanish. Science Editing Experts corrected the English of this manuscript.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

W. S. Abbott 1925. Amethod of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol. 18: 265–266 Google Scholar

2.

G. S. Andrade , J. E. Serrão , J. C. Zanuncio , T. V. Zanuncio , G. L. D. Leite , and R. A. Polanczyk 2010. Immunity of an alternative host can be overcome by higher densities of its parasitoids Palmistichus elaeisis and Trichospilus diatraeae. Plos One 05: 1–7. Google Scholar

3.

G. S. Andrade , A. H. Sousa , J. C. Santos , F. C. Gama , J. E. Serrão , and J. C. Zanuncio 2012. Oogenesis pattern and type of ovariole of the parasitoid Palmistichus elaeisis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). An. Acad. Brasileira Cien. 84: 767–774. Google Scholar

4.

F. D. Bennett , H. Glenn , M. Yaseen , and R. M. Baranowski 1987. Records of Trichospilus diatraeae, an Asian parasite (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) from the Caribbean and Florida. Florida Entomol. 70: 184–186. Google Scholar

5.

J. Brodeur , and G. Boivin 2004. Functional ecology of immature parasitoids. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 49: 27–49. Google Scholar

6.

Z. Bouček 1976. The African and Asiatic species of Trichospilus and Cotterellia (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 65: 669–681. Google Scholar

7.

R. A. Chichera , F. F. Pereira , S. O. Kassab , R. H. Barbosa , P. L. Pastori , and C. Rossoni 2012. Capacidade de busca e reprodução de Trichospilus diatraeae e Palmistichus elaeisis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) em pupas de Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Interciência 37: 1–5. Google Scholar

8.

W. I. Choi , T. J. Yoon , and M. I. Ryoo 2001. Host-sizedependent feeding behaviour and progeny sex ratio of Anisopteromalus calandrae (Hym.: Pteromalidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 125: 71–77. Google Scholar

9.

J. H. Chong , and R. D. Oetting 2006. Functional response and progeny production of the Madeira mealybug parasitoid, Anagyrus sp. nov. nr. sinope: The effects of host and parasitoid densities. Biol. Control 39: 320–328. Google Scholar

10.

J. H. Chong , and R. D. Oetting 2007. Progeny fitness of the mealybug parasitoid Anagyrus sp. nov. nr. sinope (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) as affected by brood size, sex ratio, and host quality. Florida Entomol. 90: 656–664. Google Scholar

11.

K. Favero 2009. Biologia e técnicas de criação de Trichospilus diatraeae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) em pupas de Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) e Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Dissertation, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados. Google Scholar

12.

R. Ihaka , and R. Gentleman 1996. A language for data analysis and graphics. J. Computational and Graphical Statistics 5: 299–314. Google Scholar

13.

S. I. Kazmi , and N. Chauhan 2003. Chalcidoid parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of Hypsipyla robusta (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), a pest of cedars and mahogany. Oriental Insects 37: 261–275. Google Scholar

14.

J. Lasalle 1994. North American genera of Tetrastichinae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). J. Nat. Hist. 28: 109–236. Google Scholar

15.

R. L. Melo , D. Pratissoli , R. A. Polanczyk , M. Tavares , A. Milanez , and D. F. Melo 2011. Ocorrência de Trichospilus diatraeae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) em broca-das-cucurbitáceas, no Brasil. Hortic. Brasileira 29: 228–230. Google Scholar

16.

M. R. Paron , and E. Berti-Filho 2000. Capacidade reprodutiva de Trichospilus diatraeae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) em pupas de diferentes hospedeiros (Lepidoptera). Sci. Agr. 57: 355–358. Google Scholar

17.

P. L. Pastori , L. B. Monteiro , and M. Botton 2008. Biologia e exigêneias térmicas de Trichogramma pretiosum Riley (Hymenoptera, Trichogrammatidae) linhagem bonagota criado em ovos de Bonagota salubricola (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). Rev. Brasileira Entomol. 52: 472–476. Google Scholar

18.

P. L. Pastori , F. F. Pereira , G. S. Andrade , R. O. Silva , J. C. Zanuncio , and A. I. A. Pereira 2012. Reproduction of Trichospilus diatraeae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in pupae of two lepidopterans defoliators of eucalypt. Rev. Colombiana Entomol. 38: 91–93. Google Scholar

19.

F. Pennacchio , and M. R. Strand 2006. Evolution of developmental strategies in parasitic Hymenoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 51: 233–258. Google Scholar

20.

F. F. Pereira , J. C. Zanuncio , M. T. Tavares , P. L. Pastori , and G. C. Jacques 2008. Record of Trichospilus diatraeae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) as parasitoid of the eucalyptus defoliator Thyrinteina arnobia (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) in Brasil. Phytoparasitica 36: 304–306. Google Scholar

21.

F. F. Pereira , J. C. Zanuncio , J. E. Serrão , P. L. Pastori , and F. S. Ramalho 2009. Reproductive performance of Palmistichus elaeisis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) with previously refrigerated pupae of Bombyx mori (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae). Brazilian J. Biol. 69: 865–869. Google Scholar

22.

F. F. Pereira , J. C. Zanuncio , J. E. Serrão , T. V. Zanuncio , D. Pratissoli , and P. L. Pastori 2010. The density of females of the Palmistichus elaeisis Delvare and LaSalle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) affects their reproductive performance on pupae of Bombyx mori L. (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae). An. Acad. Brasileira Cien. 81: 323–331. Google Scholar

23.

M. A. T. Rodrigues , F. F. Pereira , S. O. Kassab , P. L. Pastori , D. F. Glaeser , H. N. Oliveira , and J. C. Zanuncio 2013. Thermal requirements and generation estimates of Trichospilus diatraeae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in sugarcane producing regions of Brasil. Florida Entomol. 96: 154–159. Google Scholar

24.

L. A. Sagarra , C. Vicent , and R. K. Stewart 2000a. Mutual interference among female Anagyrus kamali Moursi (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) and its impact on fecundity, progeny production and sex ratio. Biocontrol. Sci. Techn. 10: 239–244. Google Scholar

25.

L. A. Sagarra , D. D. Peterkin , C. Vicent , and R. K. Stewart 2000b. Immune response of the hibiscus mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae), to oviposition of the parasitoid Anagyrus kamali Moursi (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). J. Insect. Physiol. 46: 647–653. Google Scholar

26.

C. S. A. Silva-Torres , and R. W. Matthews 2003. Development of Melittobia australica Girault and M. digitata Dahms (Parker) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) parasiting Neobellieria bullata (Parker) (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) puparia. Neotrop. Entomol. 32: 645–651. Google Scholar

27.

M. A. Soares , C. T. Gutierrez , J. C. Zanuncio , A. R. P. Pedrosa , and A. S. Lorenzon 2009. Superparasitismo de Palmistichus elaeisis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) y comportamiento de defensa de dos hospederos. Rev. Colombiana Entomol. 35: 62–65. Google Scholar

28.

R. G. V. Van Driesche , and T. S. Bellows 1996. Biological Control. 539 pp. New York: Chapman and Hall. Google Scholar

29.

B. Zaché , C. F. Wilcken , R. R. Da Costa , and E. P. Soliman 2010. Trichospilus diatraeae Cherian & Margabandhu, 1942 (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), a new parasitoid of Melanolophia consimilaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Phytoparasitica 38: 355–357. Google Scholar

30.

B. Zaché , R. R. C. Zaché , E. P. Soliman , and C. F. Wilcken 2011. Evaluation of Trichospilus diatraeae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) as parasitoid of the eucalyptus defoliator Euselasia eucerus (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae). Intl. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 31: 118–121. Google Scholar

31.

B. Zaché , R. R. C. Zaché , N. M. Souza , M. H. F. A. D. Pogetto , and C. F. Wilcken 2012. Evaluation of Trichospilus diatraeae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) as parasitoid of the eucalyptus defoliator Eupseudosoma aberrans Schaus, 1905 (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Biocontrol. Sci. Techn. 22: 363–366. Google Scholar

32.

B. Zamperline , and J. C. Zanuncio 1992. Influência da alimentação de Tenebrio molitor L. 1758 (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) no desenvolvimento ninfal de Podisus connexivus Bergroth, 1891 (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Rev. Árvore 16: 224–230. Google Scholar

33.

J. C. Zanuncio , F. F. Pereira , G. C. Jaques , M. T. Tavares , and J. E. Serrão 2008. Tenebrio molitor Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), a new alternative host to rear the pupae parasitoid Palmistichus elaeisis Delvare and LaSalle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Coleopts. Bull. 62: 64–66 Google Scholar
Kellen Favero, Fabricio Fagundes Pereira, Samir Oliveira Kassab, Harley Nonato De Oliveira, Daniele Perassa Costa, and José Cola Zanuncio "Biological Characteristics of Trichospilus diatraeae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) are Influenced by the Number of Females Exposed Per Pupa of Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)," Florida Entomologist 96(2), 583-589, (1 June 2013). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0224
Published: 1 June 2013
KEYWORDS
alternate host
biological control
Control biológico
cria masiva
hospedero alterno
mass-rearing
parasitism
Back to Top