Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2014 Banding Patterns of Three Leafcutter Ant Species of the Genus Atta (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) and Chromosomal Inferences
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Among Neotropical ants, the genera Acromyrmex and Atta are of great importance because they include the major agricultural pest species. Regarding the genus Atta, considered one of the most derived of the tribe Attini, cytogenetic data exists for 5 taxa that present 2n = 22 chromosomes; however, information regarding banding patterns is only available for Atta colombica. Cytogenetics has contributed to several aspects related to the family Formicidae, in particular to the understanding of its evolution. Therefore, the aim of this study was to increase the cytogenetic data on Atta sexdens rubropilosa, Atta laevigata and Atta bisphaerica belonging to populations in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The 3 species were characterized as having 2n = 22 chromosomes with a karyotypic formula of 2n = 18m 2sm 2st. Using the C-banding technique, small heterochromatic markings were observed in the centromeres of most of the chromosomes. The presence of GC-rich blocks in the interstitial region on the long arm of the fourth pair of metacentric chromosomes was indicated by CMA3 fluorochrome. The data from this study enabled a comparison with Acromyrmex striatus, a phylogenetically close species possessing the same chromosome number as the Atta species studied in this work, although clear differences were evident in the morphologies of 2 chromosome pairs and in the distribution and composition of heterochromatin. These results show the constancy of the chromosome number, morphology and banding pattern for the species studied, highlighting the importance of measuring the chromosomes to enable accurate comparison and using banding techniques to compare species of genera with a conserved chromosome number.

Leafcutter ants are considered the most derived of the tribe Attini and their origin is considered recent (Hölldobler & Wilson 1990; Schultz & Meier 1995; Villesen et al. 2002; Fernández-Marín et al. 2004; Schultz & Brady 2008; Mehdiabadi & Schultz 2010). These ants practice what Mehdiabadi & Schultz (2010) termed “leafcutter agriculture”. Leafcutter ants of the genera Atta and Acromyrmex have been referred to as the dominant herbivores of the Neotropics (Hölldobler & Wilson 1990), because they use plant, flower and seed fragments to cultivate a mutualistic fungus garden on which they feed (Della Lucia & Fowler 1993). These ants are significant agricultural pests of the Neotropical region because they cause great damage to pastures and cultivated agricultural crops (Della Lucia & Fowler 1993, Della Lucia & Souza 2011). In the natural ecosystems, leafcutter ants play an important role in seed dispersal (Teixeira et al. 2008), in modifying the structure of the vegetation surrounding the colonies (Della Lucia & Souza 2011), and in soil aeration which facilitates plant root penetration (Della Lucia 2003).

Bacci et al. (2009) conducted a molecular phylogenetic investigation of the genus Atta for 13 of the 15 described species, using DNA sequence information from the fragments of 4 genes (1 nuclear and 3 mitochondrial genes). The data supported monophyly of the genus and indicated its subdivision into 4 monophyletic groups: Atta sensu stricto, Archeatta, Neoatta and Epiatta, which was a major redefinition in the face of the various classifications of the genus proposed by different authors using morphological data.

Species are typically identified based on external morphological traits. However, morphological traits may or may not become altered over time by the selective pressure exerted by the environment to which each species is subjected, with consequences to the genotype. Thus, cytogenetic analysis is a useful tool which enables the identification and comparison of species (or sometimes populations) because chromosomal rearrangements can result in speciation (Kasahara 2009). Cytogenetics is, therefore, a suitable tool for phylogenetic, taxonomic and evolutionary studies and inferences (MacGregor 1993).

The chromosome numbers observed within the tribe Attini range from 2n = 8 in Mycocepurus goeldii (Barros et al. 2010) and Mycocepurus sp. (Murakami et al. 1998) up to 2n = 54 in Mycetarotes parallelus (Barros et al. 2011). Cytogenetic information can be used to compare populations, sympatric species and closely related ant groups (Mariano et al. 2012).

Atta and Acromyrmex are characterized by a conserved chromosome number within each genus of 2n = 22 chromosomes and 2n = 38 chromosomes, respectively, and by similar chromosome morphology within each genera (revised in Barros et al. 2011; Cristiano et al. 2013). Recent cytogenetic studies on Acromyrmex have reported some differences in the chromosome morphology and banding patterns in 6 species from Minas Gerais, Brazil and Barro Colorado, Panamá (Barros 2010), indicating that further cytogenetic studies in leafcutter ants are warranted. In the genus Acromyrmex, Acromyrmex striatus (2n = 22) differs the most from the other already known species with respect to both morphological traits and chromosome number. Its karyotype bears closer similarity to that of the species of the genus Atta (2n = 22) studied earlier, and associated with the molecular data it provided clear insights into a distinct phylogenetic position of this species among the leafcutter ants (Cristiano et al. 2013).

Cytogenetic data is now available for 5 taxa of Atta, all of which have 2n = 22 chromosomes (Table 1). Information on chromosome banding is available for a single Atta species, i.e., A. colombica, (Table 1) with heterochromatin in the interstitial region of 4 chromosomes added to the centromeric heterochromatic blocks on all the chromosomes (Murakami et al. 1998).

Table 1.

Atta species studied to date, localities, diploid chromosome number (2n) and chromosome banding data (Fluorochromes — fl and C-Banding — cb) studied in Brazil: Minas Gerais (mg), Rio Grande Do Sul (Rs); Panama: Barro Colorado and the respective subgenera according to the molecular phylogeny by Bacci et al. (2009)

t01_1698.gif

Due to the lack of cytogenetic data on leafcutter ants, the aim of the present work was to broaden the studies, adding information on 3 species of Atta as well as to enable a better understanding of the karyotype evolution of this group and further comparative studies with other phylogenetically close groups, such as the genus Acromyrmex, including Ac. striatus or studies on Trachymyrmex, considered the sister group of the leafcutter ants. This is the first time that chromosome morphology of the genus Atta was classified by measurement, allowing an accurate comparison among similar karyotypes. The classification proposed by Imai (1991) is based on heterochromatin location and details in chromosome size mainly among similar karyotypes are not highlighted, especially when the species have low amount of heterochromatin.

Material and Methods

Cytogenetic studies were conducted on 3 species of the Atta genus, i.e., Atta sexdens rubropilosa (Forel, 1908), Atta laevigata (Smith, 1858) and Atta bisphaerica Forel, 1908, all collected in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil (Table 1). A total of 26 individuals were analyzed for A. bisphaerica, 10 for Atta laevigata and 43 for A. sexdens rubropilosa. Mitotic metaphases were obtained according to Imai et al. (1988) by dissecting the cerebral ganglia of larvae after meconium elimination. Some slides were stained with 4% Giemsa and the metaphases were observed and photographed by a BX 60 microscope with a 100X lens attached to the Q-Color3 Olympus® image capture system. At least 6 individuals per species were subjected to the C-banding and fluorochrome techniques. The chromosomes were paired and ranked in decreasing order of size to determine the karyotype.

A total of 10 metaphases per species with similar degree of condensation, without overlappings and evident centromeres were measured and classified according to the specifications of Levan et al. (1964), based on the chromosome arm ratio (r) using the following features: long arm length (L), short arm length (S) and arm ratio between the long and short arms (r = L/S). The chromosomes were classified as: m = metacentric (r = 1-1.7), sm = submetacentric (r =1.7-3), st = subtelocentric (r =3-7) and a = acrocentric (r > 7). Karyotypes were organized using the Corel Photopaint X3® and Image Pro Plus® programs. The C-banding technique was performed according to Sumner (1972) with modifications proposed by Barros et al. (2013). The GC and AT rich regions were detected using the fluorochromes Chromomycin A3 (CMA3) and 4'6-diamidin-2-phenylindole (DAPI) according to Schweizer (1980).

Adult ant specimens were deposited as vouchers in the reference collection of the Laboratório de Mirmecologia, Centro de Pesquisas do Cacau (CPDC/Brazil) under the following numbers: #5712 (A. sexdens rubropilosa), #5715 (A. laevigata) and #5713 (A. bisphaerica).

Supplementary material is online at Florida Entomologist 97(4) (2014) online at  http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/entomologist/browse.

Results

The 3 species of the Atta studied presented 2n = 22 chromosomes with a karyotypic formula was 2n = 18m + 2sm + 2st (Fig. 1). The morphometric data of the chromosome pairs 10 and 11 of Atta spp. are shown in Table 2.

Small and weak heterochromatic bands were observed in the centromeric region of the chromosomes in all the 3 species (Fig. 2). Besides the centromeric blocks, the presence of a small interstitial band was observed on the long arm of the fourth pair of metacentric chromosomes for A. sexdens rubropilosa (Fig. 3a —; inbox).

The CMA3 fluorochrome staining showed interstitial marking on the long arm of the fourth pair of metacentric chromosomes for the 3 species, indicating that this region is rich in GC base pairs (Fig. 3; color version in Suppl. Fig. 3). CMA3 positive regions in A. sexdens rubropilosa corresponded to a heterochromatic region.

Regions with differential staining with DAPI, indicative of regions rich in AT base pairs, were not observed.

Fig. 1.

Karyotypes of Atta spp.: (a) A. sexdens rubropilosa, (b) A. laevigata and (c) A. bisphaerica with 2n = 22 chromosomes and karyotypic formula 2n = 18m + 2sm + 2st. Arrows indicate the presence of a secondary constriction on the fourth pair of chromosomes. Bar: 5µm.

f01_1698.jpg

Discussion

The diploid number of 2n = 22 chromosomes reported for the Atta species in the present study was also observed in other studies (Table 1). The chromosome morphology was shown to be constant in the different Atta species, unlike the observations made for the species of Acromyrmex (Barros 2010; Cristiano et al. 2013). The genera Atta and Acromyrmex are considered phylogenetically close and recognized for the constancy of their karyotype, with respect to both chromosome number and similarity in morphology in most of the species studied (revised in Barros et al. 2011; Cristiano et al. 2013). This characteristic has already been observed in the different ant groups, like those of the subgenera Myrmothrix and Myrmamblys in genus Camponotus (Formicinae) (Mariano et al. 2003) and genus Pheidole (Myrmicinae) (revised in Lorite & Palomeque 2010). However, recent cytogenetic studies on the genus Acromyrmex have revealed differences in the morphology and chromosome banding patterns in 7 species studied in Brazil and Panamá (Barros 2010; Cristiano et al. 2013).

Table 2.

Morphological analyses of two chromosome pairs of Atta spp. and Acromyrmex striatus

t02_1698.gif

In the present study, the C-banding technique indicated the existence of a small amount of heterochromatin on the chromosomes of the Atta species, with a distribution pattern in the centromeric region. Similar results regarding the heterochromatin distribution were reported by Murakami et al. (1998) for A. colombica, which has centromeric heterochromatic bands on all the chromosomes and additional interstitial bands on 2 pairs of chromosomes. However, metaphase was not illustrated in the study of Murakami et al. (1998). The genome of Atta cephalotes, included in the sensu stricto group has been sequenced and reveals that there is a low percentage of satellite DNA (Suen et al. 2011), the principal component of the constitutive heterochromatin. The C-banding technique confirmed the low amount of heterochromatin when using modern genome sequencing techniques.

Fig. 2.

Metaphases of Atta spp. submitted to the C-banding technique: (a) A. sexdens rubropilosa, (b) A. laevigata and (c) A. bisphaerica. The darker centromeric regions reveal the presence of heterochromatin. Bar: 5µm.

f02_1698.jpg

The interstitial heterochromatic band located on the fourth pair of chromosomes of A. sexdens rubropilosa corresponded to a region positively stained with CMA3 fluorochromes, indicating that this heterochromatic block was rich in GC base pairs (Fig. 3; color version in Suppl. Fig. 3). This correspondence to the CMA3 bands, however, was not observed in the centromeric heterochromatic bands of the chromosomes revealed by the Cbanding technique. The interstitial heterochromatic band of the fourth pair of chromosomes was observed only for A. sexdens rubropilosa, which was certainly due to the small band size in other species.

Fig. 3.

Metaphases of Atta stained with the fluorochromes CMA3 (metaphases on the top) and DAPI fluorochromes (metaphases on the bottom) of: (a) Atta sexdens rubropilosa, (b) Atta laevigata and (c) Atta bisphaerica. The arrows indicate GC-rich blocks and complementary negative AT regions, respectively. The fourth metacentric chromosome pair is highlighted in Fig. 3a (in box) with GC-rich interstitial heterochromatin. Bar: 5µm.

f03_1698.jpg

The interstitial region positively stained with CMA3 fluorochrome on the fourth pair of chromosomes was observed in all 3 Atta species; a secondary constriction was also visible, indicating that this GC rich heterochromatic region probably corresponds to the nucleolus organizer region (NOR). To date no published reports are available on the location of secondary constrictions in this genus of leafcutter ants. The GC-rich regions generally correspond to the NOR, which are well conserved during evolution. In the Tapinoma nigerrimum (Lorite et al. 1997) and Dinoponera lucida (Mariano et al. 2008) species the CMA3 fluorochrome pattern coincided with the NOR site verified by the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique, similar to most eukaryotes (Reed & Phillips 1995).

Recent cytogenetic studies on Ac. striatus revealed 2n = 22 chromosomes (Cristiano et al. 2013), the same chromosome number found in all the Atta species studied to date. However, the karyotype of this species did not have the same morphological traits of the chromosomes found in Atta species and morphological analyses of chromosome pairs 10 and 11 that differed between species are shown in Table 2. In Ac. striatus, the submetacentric pair is probably homeologous to the subtelocentric pair of the Atta species investigated in the present study. This difference suggests chromosome rearrangements, as for example, duplication and heterochromatin inversion during the evolution of this species, such that the positioning of a heterochromatic block on the telomere of the submetacentric pair of Ac. striatus would be possible. However, the opposite is also possible, in which the heterochromatic block could have been lost in an ancestor of the modern Atta species. Another pair of chromosomes that was also observed to be different in Ac. striatus was the smallest chromosome pair with their characteristic morphology. This small pair clearly has the 2 arms (long and short arm) which differ in size in all the Atta species already studied, although these 2 chromosome arms are similar in size in Ac. striatus. Both chromosomes have heterochromatin on the centromere of this homeologous chromosome pair, while duplication of a portion of the centromeric heterochromatin may have modified the chromosome morphology. However, variations in the euchromatic regions cannot be disregarded.

The heterochromatin distribution pattern seen in Atta species is similar to that of Ac. striatus (Cristiano et al. 2013) and is characterized by the presence of small and weak heterochromatic bands in the centromeric region of the chromosomes. However, Ac. striatus can be distinguished by the presence of additional pericentromeric bands and a telomeric marking on the short arm of the submetacentric pair. The differences noted in chromosome morphology and heterochromatin distribution patterns revealed by a comparison of the Atta species assessed in the present study with Ac. striatus show a divergence between these ant groups.

Karyotypes of the 3 leafcutter ant species of genus Atta, added to those of previously described karyotypes, were shown to be conserved in chromosome number, morphology and banding pattern, and constancy is inferred for chromosome number within the genus for the species studied to date. It included species in 3 of the 4 groups of the Atta genus based on the molecular data (Bacci et al. 2009) pertaining to A. laevigata and A. bisphaerica in the Epiatta group; A. colombica in the Atta sensu stricto group; A. sexdens rubropilosa and A. sexdens piriventris in the Neoatta group.

Data obtained from the chromosome banding techniques are scarce not only for the species of the genus Atta but for other species of the tribe Attini as well, (Barros et al. 2010; Barros et al. 2014) even though they could be very informative for our understanding of the evolution of the tribe.

Data in the present study revealed the importance of measuring the chromosomes to enable accurate interspecific comparison among the Atta spp. as well as the published information available on Ac. striatus which revealed interesting differences. The chromosome banding data indicated the importance of the techniques mentioned above for comparison among the species within the genera with a conserved chromosome number.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa da Bahia (FAPESB RED0012/2012). LACB, HJACA and JHCD acknowledge their grants from the Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPq). GAT is grateful for the grant from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG). We are grateful to Dr. Ronald Zanetti for the use of his laboratory during the collection of the biological material (UFLA), to Eliana Andrade for her assistance in the laboratory, and to Manuel José Ferreira and Geraldo Campos for their help in the field.

References Cited

1.

M. Bacci , S. E. Solomon , U. G. Mueller , V. G. Martins , A. O. Carvalho , L. G. Vieira , and A. C. O. Silva- Pinhati 2009. Phylogeny of leafcutter ants in the genus Atta Fabricius (Formicidae: Attini) based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 51(3): 427–437. Google Scholar

2.

L. A. C. Barros 2010. Citogenética de espécies de Attini (Formicidae: Myrmicinae). M.Sc. dissertation (Mestrado em Genética e Melhoramento),Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. 75 pp. Google Scholar

3.

L. A. C. Barros , H. J. A. C. Aguiar , C. S. F. Mariano , J. H. C. D. Delabie , and S. G. Pompolo 2010. Cytogenetic characterization of the lower-Attine Mycocepurus goeldii (Formicidae: Myrmicinae: Attini). Sociobiology 56(1): 57–66. Google Scholar

4.

L. A. C. Barros , C. S. F. Mariano , S. G. Pompolo , and J. H. C. Delabie 2011. Citogenética de Attini, pp. 68–79 In T. M. C. Della Lucia [ed.], Formigas- Cortadeiras da biotecnologia ao manejo. Editora UFV, Viçosa, Brazil. Google Scholar

5.

L. A. C. Barros , C. S. F. Mariano , and S. G. Pompolo 2013. Cytogenetic studies of five taxa of the tribe Attini (Formicidae: Myrmicinae). Caryologia 66(1): 59–64. Google Scholar

6.

L. A. C. Barros , H. J. A. C. Aguiar , C. S. F. Mariano , J. H. C. D. Delabie , and S. G. Pompolo 2014. Cytogenetic characterization of the ant Trachymyrmex fuscus Emery, 1934 (Formicidae: Myrmicinae: Attini) with the description of a chromosomal polymorphism. Ann. Soc. Entomol. France 50(1): 1–7. Google Scholar

7.

M. P. Cristiano , D. C. Cardoso , and T. M. Fernandes- Salomão 2013. Cytogenetic and Molecular Analyses Reveal a Divergence between Acromyrmex striatus (Roger, 1863) and Other Congeneric Species: Taxonomic Implications. PLoS ONE 8(3), e59784. Google Scholar

8.

T. M. C. Della Lucia 2003. Hormigas de importancia económica en la región Neotropical, pp. 337–349 In F. Fernandez [ed.], Introducción a las hormigas de la región Neotrop. Inst. Investigación de Recursos Biol. Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá. Google Scholar

9.

T. M. C. Della Lucia and H. G. Fowler 1993. As formigas cortadeiras, pp. 1–3 In T. M. C. Della Lucia [ed.], As formigas cortadeiras. Editora UFV. Viçosa, Brazil. Google Scholar

10.

T. M. C. Della Lucia , and D. J. Souza 2011. Importância e História de Vida das Formigas-Cortadeiras, pp. 13–26 In T. M. C. Della Lucia [ed.], Formigas-Cortadeiras da biotecnologia ao manejo. Editora UFV. Viçosa, Brazil. Google Scholar

11.

M. A. M. Fadini , and S. G. Pompolo 1996. Cytogenetics of some ant species of the tribe Attini (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from the region of Viçosa, MG. Brazilian J. Genet. 19: 53–55. Google Scholar

12.

H. Fernández-Marín , J. K. Zimmermam , and W. T. Wcislo 2004. Ecological traits and evolutionary sequence of nest establishment in fungus-growing ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Attini). Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 81(1): 39–48. Google Scholar

13.

B. Hölldobler , and E. O. Wilson 1990. The Ants. Harvard Univ. Press, USA, 732 pp. Google Scholar

14.

H. T. Imai 1991. Mutability of constitutive heterochromatin (C-bands) during eukaryotic chromosomal evolution and their cytological meaning. Japanes J. Genetics 66: 635–661. Google Scholar

15.

H. Imai , R. W. Taylor , M. W. Crosland , and R. H. Crozier 1988. Modes of spontaneous chromossomal mutation and karyotype evolution in ants with reference to the minimum interaction hypothesis. Japanese J. Genet. 63: 159–185. Google Scholar

16.

S. Kasahara 2009. Introdução à pesquisa em Citogenética de Vertebrados. 1ª ed. Soc. Brasileira Genética. Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil. 160 pp. Google Scholar

17.

A. Levan K. Fredga , and A. Sandberg 1964. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52: 201–220. Google Scholar

18.

P. Lorite , and T. Palomeque 2010. Karyotype evolution in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with a review of the known ant chromosome numbers. Myrmecol. News 13: 89–102. Google Scholar

19.

P. Lorite , A. E. Aránega , F. Luque , and T. Palomeque 1997. Analysis of the nucleolar organizing regions in the ant Tapinoma nigerrimum (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Heredity 78: 578–582. Google Scholar

20.

H. C. Macgregor 1993. An introduction to animal cytogenetics. 1st ed. Chapman & Hall. London, Great Britain. 298 pp. Google Scholar

21.

C. S. F. Mariano , J. H. C. Delabie , L. A. O. Campos , and S. G. Pompolo 2003. Trends in karyotype evolution in the ant genus Camponotus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 42(3): 831–839. Google Scholar

22.

C. S. F Mariano , S. G. Pompolo , L. A. C. Barros , E. Mariano-Neto , S. Campiolo , and J. H. C. Delabie 2008. A biogeographical study of the threatened ant Dinoponera lucida Emery (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae) using a cytogenetic approach. Insect Conserv. Diver. 1: 161–168. Google Scholar

23.

C. S. F. Mariano , S. G. Pompolo , J. G. Silva , and J. H. C. Delabie 2012. Contribution of cytogenetics to the debate on the paraphyly of Pachycondyla spp. (Hymenoptera; Formicidae; Ponerinae). Psyche 2012: 1–9. Google Scholar

24.

N. J. Mehdiabadi , and T. R. Schultz 2010. Natural history and phylogeny of the fungus-farming ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Myrmicinae: Attini). Myrmecol. News: 13, 37–55. Google Scholar

25.

T. Murakami , A. Fujiwara , and M. C. Yoshida 1998. Cytogenetics of ten ant species of the tribe Attini (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Chromosome Sci. 2: 135–139. Google Scholar

26.

K. M. Reed , and R. B. Phillips 1995. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of the Double-CMA3 chromosome of lake trout, Salvelinus namaycush. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 70: 104–107. Google Scholar

27.

M. C. Santos-Colares , J. Viégas , M. G Martino Roth , and A. E. Loeck 1997. Preparation of mitotic chromosomes of leaf-cutting ants from the genera Atta and Acromyrmex. Brazilian J. Genet. 20: 25–27. Google Scholar

28.

T. R. Schultz , and R. Meier 1995. A phylogenetic analysis of the fungus-growing ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Attini) based on morphological characters of the larvae. Syst. Entomol. 20: 337–370. Google Scholar

29.

T. R. Schultz , and S. G. Brady 2008. Major evolutionary transitions in ant agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105(14): 5435–5440. Google Scholar

30.

D. Schweizer 1980. Simultaneous fluorescent staining of R bands and specific heterochromatic regions (DA/ DAPI-bands) in human chromosomes. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 27: 190–193. Google Scholar

31.

G. Suen , C. Teiling , L. Li , C. Holt , E. Abouheif , and et al. 2011. The genome sequence of the leafcutter ant Atta cephalotes reveals insights into its obligate symbiotic lifestyle. PLoS Genet 7(2): e1002007. Google Scholar

32.

A. T. Sumner 1972. A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp. Cell Res. 83: 438–442. Google Scholar

33.

M. C. Teixeira , J. H. Schoereder , and I. Andrade 2008. Atta robusta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): endemismo, extinção ou ausência de estudos? pp. 359– 367 In E. F. Vilela , I. A. Santos , J. H. Schoereder , J. Lino-Neto , L. A. O. Campos and J. E. Serrão [ed.], Insetos Sociais: da Biologia à Aplicação 1 ed. Editora UFV, Viçosa, Brazil. Google Scholar

Notes

[1] Supplementary material for this article in Florida Entomologist 97(4) (2014) is online at  http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/entomologist/browse

Luísa Antônia Campos Barros, Gisele Amaro Teixeira, Hilton Jeferson Alves Cardoso De Aguiar, Cléa Dos Santos Ferreira Mariano, Jacques Hubert Charles Delabie, and Silvia Das Graças Pompolo "Banding Patterns of Three Leafcutter Ant Species of the Genus Atta (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) and Chromosomal Inferences," Florida Entomologist 97(4), 1694-1701, (1 December 2014). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.097.0444
Published: 1 December 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top