Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2014 Sexual Dimorphism of Rhyssomatus subtilis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Examination with a binocular microscope of adults of Rhyssomatus subtilis Fielder (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) revealed distinct differences between the sexes in the foreleg, which permits their differentiation with complete accuracy. In the female the profemual process is weak, subacute, angulate and the protibia has an uncus and mucro. In the male the profemur process is strong, curved, subacute, tooth-like and lacks an protibia uncus.

The black soybean weevil, Rhyssomatus subtilis Fiedler (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), is an important pest of soybean in Northwestern Argentina (NWA), which is expanding its geographical distribution and causing economic losses through the extensive reduction of yields (Cazado et al. 2013). The recent growth and spread of R. subtilis populations has called attention to the need for conducting more studies on the biology, behavior and ecology of the pest. As a preliminary step for these studies, it is necessary to determine the sex of adult weevils without resorting to the dissection of their genitalia. This requires finding a quick method for identifying the sex of these insects which would keep handling to a minimum (Silva-Filho et al. 2007).

Several techniques for sexing weevils have been discovered, but they differ notably from one another (Sappington et al. 2000). Internal morphology can be used to determine sex, but dissection is a tedious process which involves killing the weevils (Klassen et al. 1968; Jones et al. 1992). In some studies, sex was determined by watching weevils copulate (Mitchell 1963), but this method turns out to be impractical ordinarily. The genitalia can be partially extruded by squeezing the abdomen of some weevils, but this procedure usually injures the weevil, especially as the cuticle hardens with age (Agee 1964). It is not especially useful in most Molytinae such as Rhyssomatus due to the hard inflexible cuticle of the elytra and abdomen.

When dealing with the Curculionidae, there are various external sex characters that can be considered in order to determine the sex of weevils (Hoffman 1950; Silva-Filho et al. 2007). For Cosmopolites sordidus Germar, the angle of inclination of the last abdominal sternite and distribution of pubescence over the frons are taken into account (Longoria 1968). In the case of Anthonomus grandis Boheman and other species of Anthonomus, the focus is on differences in the tarsal claws (Agee 1964; Kovarik & Burke 1983). The presence of a thorn directed behind the legs on each intermediate coxa helps to identify male Anthonomus rubi Herbst (Innocenzi et al. 2002), whereas male Anthonomus eugenii Cano are recognized based on their metatibial mucro, which is larger and more prominently curved than those of the female (Eller 1995).

Some species of the Molytinae possess a mucro, a secondary tooth located at the inner apical angle of the uncinate tibiae. Thus, a particular tibia can have both an uncus and a mucro (Kuschel 1952; Thompson 1992).The shapes and positions of the uncus, mucro and premucro in the genus Tyloderma, Cryptorhynchinae distinguishes sexes and species groups (Wibmer 1981, 1989).

This study identifies some external secondary sexual characters that are readily detectable and that form the basis for an accurate and non-disruptive technique for sexing adult R. subtilis.

Materials and Methods

All adult weevils were collected from an emergence cage placed in a soybean field in Rosario de la Frontera (Salta province, Argentina) (S 25° 39′ 57.6″ -W 64° 56′ 58.1″), between Nov and Jun in 2010/2011 and 2011/2012. Adults were preserved in 70% ethanol and kept in it until they were examined in the laboratory.

In order to find secondary sexual characters of R. subtilis adults, the external characters of the specimens were examined, using the methodology proposed by other authors for determining sexual dimorphism of the Curculionidae (Kuschel 1952; Rosado-Neto 1987; Loja Cedeño 2011). Putative differences observed were verified by inspection of the genitalia, by means of a binocular microscope (Zeiss model Stemi DV4) with 10X magnification. For genital dissection, individuals were macerated and cleared in a KOH solution (10%) for 15 min, at 80 °C to promote dissolving of fat tissue, thus facilitating visibility of the reproductive structures as described by Castañeda-Vildózola et al. 2007.

Results

After examining 1,768 R. subtilis adults collected from the emergence cage, we found that the external characteristics of the apical armature of the fore tibia was useful for sexual determination (Fig. 1). Results showed a 100% concurrence with those reached by examining genitalia. The apical margin of the protibia of the female has a subcarinate ridge ending in an elongate, subacute uncus projecting posteriad, and has an acute mucro on the inner apical angle, partly concealed by 2 clusters of coarse setal brushes anterior and posterior to the mucro. The male has no uncus on the protibia, and all of its tibiae have only a mucro (Fig. 1). In addition, it was found that the difference in the profemoral process is striking between the sexes. In the female the process is weak and angulate and that of the male is strong, curved, subacute and tooth-like. By observing these differences with the aid of a 10X binocular microscope, it is possible to determine the sex of adult weevils via this quick, accurate and non-destructive technique, which keeps handling to a minimum.

The adult weevils were placed frontally facing the microscope lens, and without exerting too much pressure with the index finger, they were held firmly so that their forelegs spread out. This procedure allowed one to observe the presence or absence of the uncus on the protibia, as well as the different profemoral process (Fig. 1).

Discussion

Based on these results, external protibial morphology provides characters for the accurate differentiation of male and female R. subtilis adults.

This observation is in agreement with those of other authors, who reported that the presence or absence of the uncus, mucro, and premucro is a set of characters to be considered in order to determine sexual dimorphism in various species of the Curculionidae, such as Sternechus subsignatus (Rosado-Neto 1987), and Chalcodermus bicolor Fiedler 1936; Loja Cedeño 2011), as well as numerous species of the genus Bondarius (Dos-Santos 2007).

The presence of a modified metatibial mucro is a secondary sexual character of male Lissorrhoptrus and its form, and shape and number of processes is species specific as well (Kuschel 1952; Everett & Newsom 1964, O'Brien & Haseeb 2014).

Determining sex of R. subtilis adults through external characters as described and illustrated here is as accurate as genital dissection, constituting a very quick and non-destructive technique, which involves practically no handling of the live insects.

Therefore, this information and the proposed technique should make great contributions to biological and behavioral studies, including research on aggregation pheromones in this species and studies of the economic losses caused by this soybean pest.

Fig. 1.

Anterior view (A) and posterior view (B) female weevil: profemur with weak, subacute, angulate, internal process and protibia with uncus and mucro present; and anterior view (C) and posterior view (D) of male weevil: profemur with strong, curved, subacute, tooth-like, internal process and protibia lacking an uncus.

f01_1812.jpg

Acknowledgments

We thank Lic. E. Willink for constructive comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. Appreciation is also expressed to Alejandro Vera the Sección Zoología Agrícola of Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres (EEAOC), Tucumán - Argentina for providing the photographic images. This study was supported by EEAOC and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) of Argentina and it is part of the first author's doctoral thesis.

References Cited

1.

H. R. Agee 1964. Characters for determination of sex of the boll weevil. J. Econ. Entomol. 57: 500–501. Google Scholar

2.

A. Castañeda-Vildózola , J. Valdez-Carrasco , A. Equihua-Martínez , H. González-Hernández , J. Romero-Nápoles , J. F. Solís-Aguilar , and S. Ramírez-Alarcón 2007. Genitalia de tres especies de Heilipus Germar (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) que dañan frutos de aguacate (Persea americana Mill) en México y Costa Rica. Neotrop. Entomol. 36: 914–918 Google Scholar

3.

L. E. Cazado , M. G. Murúa , A. S. Casmuz , M. G. Socías , M. T. Vera , C. W. O'Brien and G. Gastaminza 2013. Geographical distribution and new associations of Rhyssomatus subtilis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Argentina. Florida Entomol. 96: 663–669. Google Scholar

4.

G. B. Dos-Santos 2007. Revisão e análise cladística de Bondarius Rosado Neto, 2006 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Molytinae, Sternechini). Tesis de maestría. Universidad Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brasil. Google Scholar

5.

F. J. Eller 1995. A previously unknown sexual character for the pepper weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Florida Entomol. 78: 180–185. Google Scholar

6.

T. R. Everett , and L. D. New som 1964. External characters for separating the sexes of the rice water weevil, Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 57: 514–515. Google Scholar

7.

A. Hoffman , 1950. Coléoptères Curculionides In Ier Partie. Faune de France 52: 486 pp. Lechevallier edit. Paris. Google Scholar

8.

P. J. Innocenzi , D. R. Hall , J. V. Cross , and S. V. Green 2002.Sexing adults of the strawberry blossom weevil, Anthonomus rubi (Col., Curculionidae). J. Appl, Entomol. 126(4): 159–160. Google Scholar

9.

R. W. Jones , J. R. Cate , E. M. Hernandez , and R. T. Navarro 1992. Hosts and seasonal activity of the boll weevil (Coleoptera:Curculionidae) in tropical and subtropical habitats of northeastern Mexico. J. Econ. Entomol. 85: 74–82. Google Scholar

10.

W. Klassen , J. F. Norland , and A. B. Bořkovec 1968. Potential chemosterilants for boll weevils. J. Econ. Entomol. 61: 401–407. Google Scholar

11.

P. Kovarik and H. R. Burke 1983. Sexual dimorphism of tarsal claws in anthonomine weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Entomol. News 94: 37–40. Google Scholar

12.

G. Kuschel 1952. Revisión de Lissorhoptrus Leconte y géneros vecinos de America. Rev. Chilena Entomol. 1: 23–74. Google Scholar

13.

P. E. Loja Cedeño 2011. Biología e manejo de Chalcodermus bicolor Fiedler (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Molytinae), em plantios de eucaliptus. Tesis de maestría inédita. Universidad Federal de Viçosa , em Viçosa, Mina Gerais, Brasil. Google Scholar

14.

A. G. G. Longoria 1968. Diferencias sexuales en la morfología externa de Cosmopolites sordidus Germar (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Ciências, Serie 4, Habana 1:11. Google Scholar

15.

E. B. Mitchell , and D. D. Hardee 1974. In-field traps: A new concept in survey and suppression of low populations of boll weevils. J. Econ. Entomol. 67: 506–508. Google Scholar

16.

C. W. O'Brien , and M. Haseeb 2014. Revision of the “rice water weevil” genus Lissorhoptrus LeConte in North America, North of Mexico (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Coleopts. Bull. 68: 163–186. Google Scholar

17.

G. H. Rosado Neto 1987. Dimorfismo sexual e distribuição geográfica de Sternechus subsignatus Boheman, 1936 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) no Brasil. An. Soc. Entomol. Brasil 16: 199–204. Google Scholar

18.

T. W. Sappington , and D. W. Spurgeon 2000. Preferred technique for adult sex determination of the boll weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 93: 610–615. Google Scholar

19.

G. Silva-Filho , O. E. Bailez , and E. A. M. Viana-Bailez 2007. Dimorfismo sexual do gorgulho-da-goiaba Conotrachelus psidii Marshall (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 36:520–524. Google Scholar

20.

R. T. Thompson 1992. Observations on the morphology and classification of weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea) with a key to major groups. J. Nat. Hist. 26: 835–891. Google Scholar

21.

G. J. Wibmer 1981. Revision of the New World weevil genus Tyloderma in America north of Mexico (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Cryptorhynchinae). Southwestern Entomologist, Suppl. 3: 1–95. Google Scholar

22.

G. J. Wibmer 1989. Revision of the weevil genus Tylodina Say (Col.: Curculionidae) in Mexico, Central America, South America, and the West Indies. Evol. Monogr. 11: 1–118. Google Scholar
Lucas E. Cazado, Charles W. O'Brien, Augusto S. Casmuz, Gerardo A. Gastaminza, and M. Gabriela Murúa "Sexual Dimorphism of Rhyssomatus subtilis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)," Florida Entomologist 97(4), 1812-1815, (1 December 2014). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.097.0457
Published: 1 December 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top