Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2015 First Record of Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Damaging Table Grape Bunches
Maurício Ursi Ventura, Sérgio Ruffo Roberto, Adriano Thibes Hoshino, Mateus Gimenez Carvalho, Fernando Teruhiko Hata, Werner Genta
Author Affiliations +

Heliothis virescens (F.) was observed damaging table grape bunches (18 d after onset of the flowering period), in Marialva County, Paraná State, Brazil. The pest fully ruined the bunches for the fresh market, and the damage was characterized as quite different from that of other lepidopteran larvae on grapes. Proximity to soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) fields in which H. virescens developed was the probable cause of its occurrence on grapes.

Viticulture is an important and extensive horticultural activity in Brazil. In the state of Paraná, viticulture occupies 5,800 ha, and the northern Paraná contains 20% of the total grapevine growing area in Brazil and 80% of the state's grapevine area. Marialva City is the most important viticultural area in the state, which produces 50% of all table grapes (Vitis vinifera L.; Vitales: Vitaceae). The varieties most cultivated are ‘Italia’, ‘Benitaka’, and ‘Rubi’ (Kishino et al. 2007). However, other crops such as soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill; Fabales: Fabaceae) are widely cultivated in this area, and a considerable amount of pesticides is used to control certain pests and diseases.

Heliothis virescens (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) was initially found damaging table grape bunches on 15-I-2013 on a farm in Marialva County (23°30′08.08″S, 51°48′43.65″W, 581 m asl) (Fig. 1). Larvae were collected and taken to the laboratory, where they were fed soybean leaves until pupation, and when the adults emerged their identification was confirmed. In this region, ‘Itália’ table grape and its natural mutants are grown in close proximity to annual crops including soybean, which was the case when H. virescens was found feeding on table grapes. In that case, the grapevines had been in full bloom 18 d previously.

After this first occurrence, other attacks were observed in several vineyards in Marialva and neighboring municipalities (up to 20 km away). Bunches were damaged internally as well as berries on the periphery; so the attack was easily observed. One to five larvae were found per bunch (Fig. 1). The presence of the larvae, their damage, and their feces rendered the grape clusters totally worthless for the fresh market (Fig. 2). The holes in the berries were also easily perceived because the mouthparts of H. virescens (Fig. 3) are larger than those of other caterpillars that appear in vineyards. These later appearing caterpillars are smaller [Cryptoblabes gnidiella (Millière, 1864) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and Argyrotaenia sphaleropa (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)], which damage the bunches internally and weave a net that protects them (Kishino et al. 2007).

Although H. virescens were more exposed (without a net on the peripheries of the grape bunches) than the other pest species of the vineyards, the ordinary treatment with the pyrethroid ζ;-Cypermethrin (Mustang©, 14.28 mL/100 L) failed to reduce the pest population. However, control was obtained with another pyrethroid, bifenthrin (Talstar©, 50 mL/100 L). This observation confirms the general experience that it is difficult to control H. virescens by chemical insecticides. Intense use of chemical insecticides against heliothine pests resulted in intense selection that generated resistance to traditional groups of insecticides, including the pyrethroids (McCaffery 1998). Heliothis virescens insecticide resistance has reduced the efficiency of chemical applications, and has required more frequent applications and changes in the active ingredients (Fitt 1989).

In recent years, changes in the agricultural landscape have induced changes in the magnitudes of populations of insect pests on crops. The increase in the damage to wheat and corn by the green stink bug, Dychelops melacanthus (Dallas) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) has been attributed largely to the growth in adoption of the no-till production system (Chocorosqui & Panizzi 2004). Furthermore, populations of some secondary species of caterpillars have erupted in several regions. Initially, these pests appeared more intensely in the Midwest region and later became generally distributed. Several factors may be related to the increased prevalence of this pest group, among them the incorporation of extensive areas of cultivation in monoculture; the neglect of integrated pest management as a guiding strategy; frequent use of preventive insecticide applications; lack of crop rotation; the application of fungicides to control soybean rust, Phakopsora pachyrhizi Syd. & P. Syd. (Uredinales: Phakopsoraceae), which negatively affects entomopathogenic fungi such as Nomuraeae rileyi (Farlow) Samson (Hypocreales: Clavipitaceae); and corn cultivation in late summer. The adoption of transgenic Bt cottons also exerts suppressive effects on populations of caterpillars and their natural enemies, while allowing other pest species to become more damaging (Lu et al. 2010; Hagenbucher et al. 2013).

This whole scenario of changed environmental conditions is exerting different selection pressures. Thus in some regions, polyphagous pests become “pests of the production systems,” which goes beyond the concept of “pests of agricultural crops,” because they may attack several cultivated hosts, as is the case with the genera Heliothis and Spodoptera. Heliothis virescens was reported for many years in Brazil as a pest of cotton. However, recently, H. virescens attacks have been occurring also on soybean. The ability of Heliothis spp. to adapt to diverse cropping systems, together with a wider geographic range, its polyphagous nature, and resistance to insecticides have transformed this species group into one of the major pest problems worldwide (McCaffery 1998).

On soybean, H. virescens larvae feed on pods and eventually cause defoliation (Panizzi et al. 2013). The growth of the H. virescens population on soybean has provided the conditions for it to utilize alternative food sources, in this case, the vine. About 8 plant families are included in the spectrum of host plants of H. virescens, and more than 100 plant species are considered to be hosts, of which 20 species are of economic importance (Blanco et al. 2008). Typically, the use of these alternative hosts by H. virescens is related to the presence of abundant food resources that determine the population growth (Capinera 2012). According to this author, alfalfa (Medicago sativa), clover (Trifolium spp.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), flax (Linum usitatissimum), soybean, and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) are main hosts, whereas secondary attacks occur mostly on vegetable and flower crops.

Fig. 1.

Larva of Heliothis virescens damaging grape bunches.


On young grape bunches H. virescens usually bores into buds, blossoms, and small fruits. In general, larvae prefer plant structures with higher levels of nitrogen, including reproductive structures such as cotton buds and bolls, corn ears, tobacco buds, and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) heads, and this feeding habit contributes to its severe pest status (Fitt 1989).

Fig. 2.

Grape bunch damaged by Heliothis virescens worthless for the fresh market.


Fig. 3.

Holes made by Heliothis virescens in berries of a grape bunch.


References Cited


CA Blanco , AP Terán-Vargas , CA Abel , M Portilla , G Rojas , JA Morales-Ramos , GL. Snodgrass 2008. Plant host effect on the development of Heliothis virescens F. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environmental Entomology 37: 1538–1547. Google Scholar


J. Capinera 2012. Featured creatures: tobacco budworm: Heliothis virescens (Fabricius) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). (last accessed 11 April 2013). Google Scholar


VR Chocorosqui , AR. Panizzi 2004. Impact of cultivation systems on Dichelops melacanthus (Dallas) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) populations and damage and its chemical control on wheat. Neotropical Entomology 33: 487–492. Google Scholar


GP. Fitt 1989. The ecology of Heliothis species in relation to agroecosystems. Annual Review of Entomology 34: 17–52. Google Scholar


S Hagenbucher , FL Wackers , FE Wettstein , DM Olson , JR Ruberson , J. Romeis 2013. Pest trade-offs in technology: reduced damage by caterpillars in Bt cotton benefits aphids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 280: 20130042, DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0042. Google Scholar


AA Kishino , W Genta , SR. Roberto 2007. Introdução, pp. 13–33 In AY Kishino , SLC Carvalho , SR. Roberto [eds.], Viticultura Tropical: o sistema de produção do Paraná. Instituto Agronômico do Paraná, Londrina, Brazil. Google Scholar


Y Lu , W Kongming , J Yuying , B Xia , P Li , H Feng , KAG Wyckhuys , H Feng , KAG Wyckhuys , Y. Guo 2010. Mirid bug outbreaks in multiple crops correlated with wide-scale adoption of Bt cotton in China. Science 328: 1151–1154. Google Scholar


AR. McCaffery 1998. Resistance to insecticides in heliothine Lepidoptera: a global view. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 353: 1735–1750. Google Scholar


AR Panizzi , AF Bueno , FAC. Silva 2013. Insetos que atacam vagens e grãos, pp. 335–420 In CB Hoffmann-Campo , BS Corrêa-Ferreira , F Moscardi [eds.], Soja: Manejo integrado de insetos e outros insetos praga. Embrapa, Brazil. Google Scholar
Maurício Ursi Ventura, Sérgio Ruffo Roberto, Adriano Thibes Hoshino, Mateus Gimenez Carvalho, Fernando Teruhiko Hata, and Werner Genta "First Record of Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Damaging Table Grape Bunches," Florida Entomologist 98(2), 783-786, (1 June 2015).
Published: 1 June 2015
dano à planta
host plant
new occurrence
nova ocorrência
plant damage
planta hospedeira
Back to Top