Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 September 2015 Rare Production of Nymphs in an Asian Subterranean Termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) Incipient Colony
Thomas Chouvenc, Aaron J. Mullins, Nan-Yao Su
Author Affiliations +

Coptotermes colonies usually produce nymphs when a colony reaches maturity. In this study, we describe a rare case of nymph production from a 10-mo-old colony that previously had lost a primary reproductive. Such replacement reproductives are not functional. We suggest that the unusual developmental plasticity we observed may be the result of a vestigial developmental pathway that may partially regain its functionality in mature colonies.

Termite colonies have a long life cycle, wherein the colony needs to mature before being able to invest in reproduction (Nutting 1969). Alate production occurs through several instars of nymphs (Raina et al. 2004, Chouvenc & Su 2014), and in the Asian subterranean termite, Coptotermes gestroi (Wasmann) (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae), it can take up to 8 yr for a colony to mature (Costa-Leonardo et al. 2005). Nymphs are found primarily in mature colonies that are in the process of producing alates for dispersal flights (Lenz et al. 1988; Roisin & Lenz 1999; Raina et al. 2004; Albino & Costa-Leonardo 2011; Chouvenc & Su 2014). Occasionally, a few of these nymphs may become secondary or replacement reproductives within their native colony (Myles 1999). Although the replacement of primary reproductives was described from mature colonies after artificial orphaning in some Coptotermes species (Lenz & Barret 1982; Lenz & Runko 1993; Roisin & Lenz 2002), the production of such nymphs in young Coptotermes colonies has received little documentation. The only previous study, by Costa-Leonardo et al. (2004), showed that some 3-yr-old orphaned colonies of C. gestroi were able to produce nymphs, with the condition that larvae were present at the time of orphaning. In addition, Costa-Leonardo et al. (2004) observed that replacement by brachypterous nymphs occurred in two 3-yr-old colonies that naturally lost a primary reproductive. All nymphs obtained in the study by Costa-Leonardo et al. (2004) were apparently reproductively non-functional. This is presumably because the colonies were too immature and lacked resources to produce functional replacement reproductives. To our knowledge, it has not been observed that Coptotermes colonies younger than 3 yr old have the ability to produce nymphs.

In Mar 2014, 380 colonies of C. gestroi were established in the laboratory using the protocol described by Chouvenc et al. (2015). Briefly, 1 male and 1 female C. gestroi dealates were paired in a vial (8 × 2.5 cm diameter) with soil, wood, and agar. Between 9 and 10 mo after foundation, 250 colonies were opened to count all individuals. During the census, we observed that 76% of the colonies had successfully established (i.e, with both surviving primary reproductives, plus eggs, larvae, workers, and soldiers, and no nymphs observed). In the 60 colonies that were “unsuccessful,” there was either no brood, no eggs, or at least one missing primary reproductive. In one of these 10-mo-old failed colonies, we observed nymphs present. This colony contained 1 male (primary reproductive), no eggs, no larvae, 43 workers, 5 soldiers, and 5 nymphs (Fig. 1). All nymphs were females and had wing buds. All individuals were transferred to a new vial, which was re-opened after 12 mo to check again for eggs or larvae, but none were found.

In a different experiment initiated in 2013, twelve 1-yr-old colonies of C. gestroi were orphaned by removing the queen. We observed that 1 yr after removal, 8 of the 12 colonies produced 1 or 2 neotenic females displaying visible physogastry. However, none of the 2-yr-old orphaned colonies had eggs or larvae, and all contained only visibly old individuals. In both observations, the absence of eggs and larvae in colonies that produced neotenic females suggests that, as previously observed by Costa-Leonardo et al. (2004), young Coptotermes colonies may not have the ability to produce fully functional replacement reproductives, possibly due to the lack of resources (Roisin & Lenz 2002) or the accelerated development of individuals (Chouvenc et al. 2014, 2015).

When compared with caste developmental plasticity of Reticulitermes species or other lower termites (Grassé & Noirot 1957; Buchli 1958; Greenberg & Stuart 1982), it has been established that Coptotermes species do not possess the flexibility to change their developmental pathway outside of particular environmental and internal cues (Chouvenc & Su 2014). The physiological trigger to produce nymphs and replacement reproductives from larvae in cases of orphaning, as previously described in mature Coptotermes colonies (Lenz & Runko 1993), is also true in incipient colonies (< 10 mo old), although rare. As observed in the current study and by Costa-Leonardo et al. (2004), as the colony grew older, orphaned young colonies (1-3 yr old) produced nymphs more often than orphaned incipient colonies. However, none of the neotenics observed in both studies displayed reproductive functionality. The non-functional neotenic females in incipient Coptotermes colonies may represent a vestigial trait wherein the pathway still exists but has lost its function, whereas it was conserved in termites such as Reticulitermes (Pawson & Gold 1996; Myles 1999). Such function may be regained by mature C. gestroi colonies that have enough resources to use such developmental pathway efficiently in order to insure the survival of the colony when in a precarious situation.

We thank Stephanie Osorio and Kelly Ugarelli for technical assistance.

Fig. 1.

Group of Coptotermes gestroi individuals from the only incipient colony (10 mo old) that produced nymphs in this study. W = worker, S = soldier, M = male (primary reproductive), N = nymph (with wing buds).


References Cited


E Albino , AM Costa-Leonardo. 2011. Nymphs in foraging populations of Coptotermes gestroi (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Animal Biology 61: 427–439. Google Scholar


HHR Buchli. 1958. L'origine des castes et les potentialités ontogéniques des termites européens du genre Reticulitermes Holmgren. Ph.D. thesis, Université, Faculté des Sciences, Paris, France. Google Scholar


T Chouvenc , NY Su. 2014. Colony age-dependent pathway in caste development of Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki. Insectes Sociaux 61: 171–182. Google Scholar


T Chouvenc , M Basille , HF Li , NY Su . 2014. Developmental instability in incipient colonies of social insects. PLoS ONE 9: e113949. Google Scholar


T Chouvenc , M Basille , NY Su. 2015. The production of soldiers and the maintenance of caste proportions delay the growth of termite incipient colonies. Insectes Sociaux 62: 23–29. Google Scholar


AM Costa-Leonardo , A Arab , FE Casarin. 2004. Neotenic formation in laboratory colonies of the termite Coptotermes gestroi after orphaning. Journal of Insect Science 4: 10. Google Scholar


AM Costa-Leonardo , A Arab , H Hertel. 2005. Note about the first swarming in a laboratory colony of Coptotermes gestroi (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Sociobiology 45: 137–139. Google Scholar


PP Grassé , Ch Noirot. 1957. La société de Calotermes flavicolis (Insecte Isoptère), de sa foundation au premier essaimage. Compte Rendu de l'Acadademie des Sciences 246: 1789–1795. Google Scholar


SLW Greenberg , AM Stuart. 1982. Precocious reproductive development (neoteny) by larvae of a primitive termite Zootermopsis angusticollis (Hagen). Insectes Sociaux 29: 535–547. Google Scholar


M Lenz , RA Barrett. 1982. Neotenic formation in field colonies of Coptotermes lacteus (Froggatt) in Australia, with comments on the roles of neotenics in the genus Coptotermes (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Sociobiology 7: 47–59. Google Scholar


M Lenz , S Runko. 1993. Long-term impact of orphaning on field colonies of Coptotermes lacteus (Froggatt) (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Insectes Sociaux 40: 439–456. Google Scholar


M Lenz , RA Barrett , LR Miller. 1988. Mechanisms of colony re-establishment after orphaning in Coptotermes lacteus (Froggatt) (Isoptera; Rhinotermitidae). Sociobiology 14: 245–268. Google Scholar


TG Myles. 1999. Review of secondary reproduction in termites (Insecta: Isoptera) with comments on its role in termite ecology and social evolution. Sociobiology 33: 1–43. Google Scholar


WL Nutting. 1969. Flight and colony foundation. Biology of termites, pp. 233–282 In K Krishna , FM Weesner [eds.], Termite Biology Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, USA. Google Scholar


BM Pawson , RE Gold. 1996. Caste differentiation and reproductive dynamics of three subterranean termites in the genus Reticulitermes (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Sociobiology 28: 241–252. Google Scholar


A Raina , W Osbrink , YI Park. 2004. Nymphs of the Formosan subterranean termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae): aspects of formation and transformation. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97: 757–764. Google Scholar


Y Roisin , M Lenz. 1999. Caste developmental pathways in colonies of Coptotermes lacteus (Froggatt) headed by primary reproductives (Isoptera, Rhinotermitidae). Insectes Sociaux 46: 273–280. Google Scholar


Y Roisin , M Lenz. 2002. Origin of male-biased sex allocation in orphaned colonies of the termite, Coptotermes lacteus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 51: 472–479. Google Scholar
Thomas Chouvenc, Aaron J. Mullins, and Nan-Yao Su "Rare Production of Nymphs in an Asian Subterranean Termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) Incipient Colony," Florida Entomologist 98(3), 972-973, (1 September 2015).
Published: 1 September 2015
developmental plasticity
plasticidad del desarrollo
replacement reproductive
reproductiva de reemplazo
Back to Top